Monofilament vs multifilament suture for uterine closure at the time of cesarean delivery: a randomized clinical trial

Fostering Excellence in Obstetrical Surgery

Introduction

This obstetric surgery review is directed toward the common obstetrical surgeries (caesarean delivery, VBAC/TOLAC, operative vaginal delivery, placenta accreta spectrum) with evidence for quality and safety to allow for obstetrical outcome excellence.

Materials and Methods

This focused scoping review has used a structured process for article identification and inclusion for each of the focused surgeries.

Results

The review results provide an obstetrical surgery (OS) overview for caesarean delivery, vaginal birth after caesarean delivery and/or trial of labor after caesarean delivery, operative vaginal delivery, placenta accreta spectrum; considerations for quality and safety variance due to non-clinical human factors; quality improvement (QI) tools; OS QI implementation cohorts; implementation considering certain barriers and solutions.

Conclusion

Administrative health care systems and obstetrical surgery care providers cannot afford, not to consider and implement, certain evidenced-based "bottom-up/top-down" processes for quality and safety, as the patients will demand the quality and the safety, but the lawyers should not have to enforce it.

Hysteroscopic resection vs ultrasound-guided dilation and evacuation for treatment of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy is a type of ectopic pregnancy in which the fertilized egg is implanted in the muscle or fibrous tissue of the scar after a previous cesarean delivery. The condition can be catastrophic if not managed on time and can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. Several approaches have been studied for the management of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy in women who opted for termination of pregnancy with no consensus on the best treatment modality reached so far.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the success rate of hysteroscopic resection vs ultrasound-guided dilation and evacuation for the treatment of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a parallel group, nonblinded, randomized clinical trial conducted at a single center in Italy. Women with singleton gestations at <8 weeks and 6 days of gestation were included in the study. Inclusion criteria were women with a cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy with positive embryonic heart activity who opted for termination of pregnancy. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either hysteroscopic resection (ie, intervention group) or ultrasound-guided dilation and evacuation (ie, control group). Both groups received 50 mg/m2 of methotrexate intramuscularly at the time of randomization (day 1) and another dose at day 3. A third dose of methotrexate was planned in case of persistence of positive fetal heart activity at day 5. Participants received either ultrasound-guided dilation and evacuation or hysteroscopic resection from 1 to 5 days after the last dose of methotrexate. Hysteroscopic resection was performed under spinal anesthesia using a 15 Fr bipolar mini-resectoscope. Dilation and evacuation were performed by vacuum aspiration with a Karman cannula, followed by sharp curettage, if necessary, under ultrasound guidance. The primary outcome was the success rate of the treatment protocol, defined as no further treatment required until the complete resolution of the cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. Resolution of the cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy was evaluated based on decline of beta-hCG and the absence of residual gestational material in the endometrial cavity. Treatment failure was defined as the necessity for further treatment required until the complete resolution of the cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. A sample size calculation indicated that 54 participants were required to test the hypothesis RESULTS: A total of 54 women were enrolled and randomized. Number of previous cesarean deliveries ranged from 1 to 3. Overall, 10 women received a third dose of methotrexate with 7 of 27 (25.9%) participants in the hysteroscopic resection group and 3 of 27 (11.1%) in the dilation and evacuation group. The success rate was 100% (27/27) in the hysteroscopic resection group and 81.5% (22/27) in the dilation and evacuation group (relative risk, 1.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.48). Additional procedures were required in 5 cases of the control group, namely 3 hysterectomies, 1 laparotomic uterine segmental resection, and 1 hysteroscopic resection. The length of stay in the hospital was 9.0±2.9 days in the intervention group and 10.0±3.5 days in the control group (mean difference, -1.00 days; 95% confidence interval, -2.71 to 0.71). No cases of admission to intensive care unit or maternal death were reported.

CONCLUSION

Hysteroscopic resection was associated with an increased success rate in the treatment of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy when compared with ultrasound-guided dilation and evacuation.

Incidence and ultrasonographic characteristics of cesarean scar niches after uterine closure by double-layer barbed suture: A prospective comparative study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the ultrasonographic features of uterine scars and clinical symptoms after cesarean delivery (CD) using barbed and conventional smooth sutures.

METHODS

This case-control study enrolled women who underwent primary CD at 37 weeks of pregnancy or later. The uterus was closed using either double-layer unidirectional barbed suture or conventional double-layer smooth suture. Ultrasound scans of the uterine scar and evaluations of menstrual patterns were performed at 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery.

RESULTS

In all, 102 patients underwent uterine closure with barbed suture, while 135 patients underwent smooth suture. At 6 months, patients in the barbed group had a lower incidence of uterine niches (20.2% vs 32.6%) that were also shallower in depth (P < 0.001). Lower incidence of niches was also observed in the barbed group at 12 and 24 months (P = 0.043 and 0.048, respectively). At these two follow-up times, the smooth group had a higher number of patients reporting postmenstrual spotting (P < 0.05) and more postmenstrual spotting days per month (P < 0.050).

CONCLUSION

The use of double-layer barbed suture during CD was associated with a lower incidence of scar niches and a more favorable menstrual pattern compared with the use of smooth suture.

Aetiology, risk factors and preventive strategies for niche development: A review

The increase in caesarean sections (CS) has resulted in an increase in women with a uterine niche. The exact aetiology of niche development has yet to be elucidated but is likely multifactorial. This study aimed to give a systematic overview of the available literature on histopathological features, risk factors and results of preventive strategies on niche development to gain more insight into the underlying mechanisms. Based on current published data histopathological findings associated with niche development were necrosis, fibrosis, inflammation, adenomyosis and insufficient approximation. Patient-related risk factors included multiple CS, BMI and smoking. Labour-related factors were CS before onset of labour, extended cervical dilatation, premature rupture of membranes and presenting part of the fetus at CS below the pelvic inlet. Preventive strategies should focus on the optimal level of incision, training of surgeons and full-thickness closure of the myometrium (single or double-layer) using non-locking sutures. Conflicting data exist concerning the effect of endometrial inclusion. Future studies without heterogeneity in population, using standardized performance of the CS after proper training and using standardized niche evaluation with a relevant core outcome set are required to allow meta-analyses and to develop evidence-based preventive strategies. These studies are needed to reduce the prevalence of niches and prevent complications in subsequent pregnancies such as caesarean scar pregnancies.

Cesarean scar disorder: Management and repair

Cesarean scar disorder (CSD) is an entity recently defined as uterine niche with at least one primary or 2 secondary symptoms. CSDs can be visualized by hysterosalpingography, transvaginal sonography, saline infusion sonohysterography, hysteroscopy, and magnetic resonance imaging, but diagnosis should be performed by exams able to measure the residual myometrial thickness (RMT). Although there is a limited number of studies evaluating fertility and reproductive outcomes after different types of surgery, the following consideration should be kept in mind. Asymptomatic women should not be operated with the hope of improving obstetrical outcomes. It is reasonable to consider hormone therapy for CSDs as a symptomatic treatment in women who no longer wish to conceive and have no contraindications. In case of failure of or contraindications to medical treatment, surgery should be offered according to the severity of symptoms, including infertility, the desire or otherwise to preserve the uterus, the size of the CSD, and RMT measurement. Hysteroscopy is considered to be more of a resection than a repair, so women who desire pregnancy should be excluded from this technique in case of RMT <3 mm. In this instance, repair is essential and can only be achieved by a laparoscopic or vaginal approach. The benefit of laparoscopic approach seems to persist after subsequent CS. Women with CSDs need to be given complete information, including available literature, before any treatment decision is made.

The definition, diagnosis, and symptoms of the uterine niche - A systematic review

Of all neonates, 21% are delivered by cesarean section (CS). A long-term maternal complication of an SC is a uterine niche. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the current literature on imaging techniques and niche-related symptomatology. We performed systematic searches on imaging and niche symptoms. For both searches, 87 new studies were included. Niche evaluation by transvaginal sonography (TVS) or contrast sonohysterography (SHG) proved superior over hysteroscopy or magnetic resonance imaging. Studies that used SHG in a random population identified a niche prevalence of 42%-84%. Niche prevalence differed based on niche definition, symptomatology, and imaging technique. Most studies reported an association with gynecological symptoms, poor reproductive outcomes, obstetrical complications, and reduced quality of life. In conclusion, non-invasive TVS and SHG are the superior imaging modalities to diagnose a niche. Niches are prevalent and strongly associated with gynecological symptoms and poor reproductive outcomes.

Prognostic model on niche development after a first caesarean section: development and internal validation

OBJECTIVE

To develop and internally validate a prognostic prediction model for development of a niche in the uterine scar after a first caesarean section (CS).

STUDY DESIGN

Secondary analyses on data of a randomized controlled trial, performed in 32 hospitals in the Netherlands among women undergoing a first caesarean section. We used multivariable backward logistic regression. Missing data were handled using multiple imputation. Model performance was assessed by calibration and discrimination. Internal validation using bootstrapping techniques took place. The outcome was 'development of a niche in the uterus', defined as an indentation of ≥ 2 mm in the myometrium.

RESULTS

We developed two models to predict niche development: in the total population and after elective CS. Patient related risk factors were: gestational age, twin pregnancy and smoking, and surgery related risk factors were double-layer closure and less surgical experience. Multiparity and Vicryl suture material were protective factors. The prediction model in women undergoing elective CS revealed similar results. After internal validation, Nagelkerke R² ranged from 0.01 to 0.05 and was considered low; median area under the curve (AUC) ranged from 0.56 to 0.62, indicating failed to poor discriminative ability.

CONCLUSIONS

The model cannot be used to accurately predict the development of a niche after a first CS. However, several factors seem to influence scar healing which indicates possibilities for future prevention such as surgical experience and suture material. The search for additional risk factors that play a role in development of a niche should be continued to improve the discriminative ability.

Suture type for hysterotomy closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

Recent randomized controlled trials have demonstrated an association between uterine closure technique at the time of cesarean delivery and short- and long-term operative outcomes with varied results. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine types of suture material used for cesarean delivery.

DATA SOURCES

Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception of each database to October 2021.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

All randomized controlled trials that compared types of suture materials used for hysterotomy closure during low-transverse cesarean delivery at ≥24 weeks' gestation and examined maternal outcomes were included for this review. The primary outcome was estimated blood loss. Secondary outcomes included additional surgical complications.

METHODS

Results were summarized as mean difference or risk ratio with associated 95% confidence intervals. The quality of studies was evaluated with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions for judging risk of bias. Heterogeneity was measured using I-squared (Higgins I2).

RESULTS

This review included 7 randomized controlled trials, of which 3 compared multifilament with barbed suture (136 vs 136 participants), 3 compared multifilament with conventional monofilament suture (245 vs 244 participants), and 1 trial compared multifilament with chromic suture (4590 vs 4595 participants). Primary analysis showed no difference in estimated blood loss between the multifilament and the barbed suture group (mean difference, 46.2 mL; 95% confidence interval, -13.6 to 105.9), nor in change in hemoglobin concentration between the multifilament and the conventional monofilament group (mean difference, -0.1%; 95% confidence interval, -0.5 to 0.3). Secondary outcomes showed a reduction in operative time with barbed vs multifilament suture (mean difference, 1.9 minutes; 95% confidence interval, 0.03-3.8). Analysis also demonstrated an increased uterine scar thickness with use of conventional monofilament vs multifilament suture (mean difference, -1.05 mm; 95% confidence interval, -1.9 to -0.2).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis does not support a specific type of suture material for uterine closure at cesarean delivery because of insufficient data. Although barbed suture was associated with an overall decrease in operative time, and use of conventional monofilament suture was associated with an increase in uterine scar thickness, the clinical utility of these differences is not clear. Further adequate randomized controlled trials are warranted for evaluation of different suture materials for hysterotomy closure.