Assessment of adherence to aspirin for preeclampsia prophylaxis and reasons for nonadherence

Update on Preeclampsia and Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy

There have been recent advances in the prevention, diagnosis, and management of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy which complicate approximately 16% of pregnancies in the United States. Initiation of low-dose aspirin by 16 weeks' gestation reduces preeclampsia in high-risk women. The Food and Drug Administration approved the use of the soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1/placental growth factor ratio for the short-term prediction of preeclampsia. Pregnancy outcomes are improved in women with chronic hypertension when antihypertensives are initiated at a threshold blood pressure of 140/90 mm Hg. Women with prior preeclampsia have increased cardiovascular disease risk and should receive risk reduction counseling.

Barriers and facilitators of adherence to low-dose aspirin during pregnancy: A co-produced systematic review and COM-B framework synthesis of qualitative evidence

INTRODUCTION

Women at increased risk of developing pre-eclampsia are advised to take a daily low-dose of aspirin from 12 weeks of pregnancy to reduce their risks. Despite the well-established prophylactic effect of aspirin, adherence to this therapy is low. This systematic review aimed to summarise evidence on the barriers and facilitators of adherence to low-dose aspirin to inform intervention development to support decision making and persistence with aspirin use for pre-eclampsia prevention.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research was co-produced by representatives from charities, and public, clinical and academic members. Eight electronic databases (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE, Prospero, OpenGrey), archives of charities and professional organisations were searched (between October and November 2023 and re-run in August 2023) using predefined search terms. Studies containing qualitative components related to barriers and facilitators of adherence to low-dose aspirin during pregnancy were included. Quality assessment was performed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist for qualitative research. A combination of the COM-B framework with phases of adherence process as defined by international taxonomy was used as the coding framework. Co-production activities were facilitated by use of 'Zoom' and 'Linoit'.

RESULTS

From a total of 3377 papers identified through our searches, five published studies and one dissertation met our inclusion criteria. Studies were published from 2019 to 2022 covering research conducted in the USA, Canada, UK, Netherlands and Australia. Barriers and facilitators to adherence were mapped to six categories of the COM-B for three phases of adherence: initiation, implementation, and discontinuation. The discontinuation phase of adherence was only mentioned by one author. Four key themes were identified relating to pregnancy: 'Insufficient knowledge', 'Necessity concerns balance', 'Access to medicine', 'Social influences', and 'Lack of Habit'.

CONCLUSIONS

The COM-B framework allowed for detailed mapping of key factors shaping different phases of adherence in behavioural change terms and now provides a solid foundation for the development of a behavioural intervention. Although potential intervention elements could be suggested based on the results of this synthesis, additional co-production work is needed to define elements and plan for the delivery of the future intervention.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42022359718. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022359718.

Feasibility of Universal Screening for Preeclampsia Risk and Aspirin Recommendation in the Ultrasound Unit

OBJECTIVE

 To evaluate the feasibility and impact of using the first-trimester ultrasound visit to identify and counsel women at increased risk of preeclampsia about the benefits of low-dose aspirin (LDA) for preventing preeclampsia. We also assessed patient-reported utilization of LDA, perceived risk for preeclampsia, and clinical outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

 Women presenting for routine first-trimester nuchal-translucency (NT) ultrasounds were screened for clinical preeclampsia risks using a self-administered risk assessment. Women at moderate or high risk for preeclampsia were counseled to take LDA, if not already taking it. LDA utilization and perceived risk for preeclampsia were assessed during the second-trimester ultrasound. Factors associated with LDA utilization were analyzed. Pregnancy outcomes were compared between those who used LDA and those who did not.

RESULTS

 Slightly more than 20% of patients (765/3,669) screened at increased risk for developing preeclampsia. Of those, 67.8% (519/765) had not received LDA recommendations from their referring obstetrician and 97 had not been taking LDA despite being advised to do so. Combined, 94.6% (583/616) of these patients eligible to start LDA prophylaxis received the indicated counseling during the ultrasound visit. A total of 61.4% (358/583) of women completed the follow-up form and of those 77.9% (279/358) reported taking LDA. Screening at increased risk for preeclampsia and perception of increased risk were positively associated with LDA utilization, whereas concerns for LDA safety were negatively associated with use. African American/Black patients and Medicaid recipients were less likely to use LDA. Pregnancy outcomes were similar between those who used LDA and those who did not.

CONCLUSION

 Assessing preeclampsia risk and counseling patients about LDA at the time of the NT ultrasound are feasible in the ultrasound unit and led to good LDA utilization among women at increased risk for preeclampsia. This intervention may standardize patient care and help close the disparity in maternal health.

KEY POINTS

· A simple intervention captured 2/3 of eligible patients.. · Aspirin utilization rate was good after the intervention.. · Screening high risk for preeclampsia and self-perception of risk correlated with aspirin use..

Preeclampsia prevention: a survey study on knowledge and practice among prenatal care providers in Ethiopia

BACKGROUND

Knowledge and practice gaps among providers have been cited as factors behind the underuse of aspirin for preeclampsia prevention globally.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the knowledge and practice levels of prenatal care providers at a national tertiary referral hospital in Ethiopia and its catchment health institutions.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a cross-sectional survey on the knowledge and practice of preeclampsia prevention through aspirin prophylaxis among prenatal care providers at St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College (Ethiopia) and its catchment health institutions. Data were collected prospectively using a structured questionnaire on ODK (Get ODK Inc, San Diego, CA). The primary objective of our study was to determine the knowledge and practice levels among prenatal care providers. Data were analyzed using SPSS software (version 23; IBM, Chicago, IL). Simple descriptive analyses were performed to analyze the data. Proportions and percentages were used to present the results.

RESULTS

A total of 92 prenatal care providers working at 17 health institutions were approached, and 80 of them agreed to participate in the study, constituting a response rate of 87%. The mean scores of knowledge and practice of preeclampsia prevention using aspirin were 42.90 (±0.13) and 45.8 (±0.07), respectively. Most of the providers had poor knowledge (score of <50%) and poor practice (score of <50%). Among the 80 prenatal care providers, only 19 (23.8%) had good knowledge, and only 29 (36.3%) had good practice. More than half of the respondents (49/80 [61.3%]) mentioned "lack of national guidelines for use of aspirin in pregnancy" as the main factor that affected their practice of aspirin prophylaxis for preeclampsia prevention in pregnant women. Among the resources used as a reference for the practice of aspirin prophylaxis for preeclampsia prevention, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics or World Health Organization guidelines (45/80 [56.3%]) were the most frequently used resources, followed by American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines (36/80 [45.0%]) and clinical judgment (36/80 [45.0%]).

CONCLUSION

Our results support previous reports of significant knowledge-to-practice gaps in the use of aspirin prophylaxis for preeclampsia prevention among prenatal care providers. Moreover, the results underscore the need for immediate action in narrowing this gap among providers by availing practical national guidelines for preeclampsia prevention and in-service trainings.

Aspirin in Pregnancy

Preeclampsia is associated with significant perinatal morbidity and mortality. Aspirin has been long purported and extensively studied for prevention of preeclampsia. For this reason, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine recommend its use in pregnancy for preeclampsia prevention in those at high risk. Yet, much controversy exists regarding optimal use in pregnancy with guidelines across global organizations varying. In this narrative review, we summarize the published literature related to the safety, optimal dose, and timing and duration of use of aspirin, as well as other indications for which aspirin has been studied in pregnancy.

Which first-trimester risk assessment method for preeclampsia is most suitable? A model-based impact study

BACKGROUND

Low-dose aspirin treatment reduces the risk of preeclampsia among high-risk pregnant women. Internationally, several first-trimester risk-calculation methods are applied.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the costs and benefits of different first-trimester preeclampsia risk estimation algorithms: EXPECT (an algorithmic prediction model based on maternal characteristics), National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (a checklist of risk factors), and the Fetal Medicine Foundation (a prediction model using additional uterine artery Doppler measurement and laboratory testing) models, coupled with low-dose aspirin treatment, in comparison with no risk assessment.

STUDY DESIGN

We constructed a decision analytical model estimating the number of cases of preeclampsia with each strategy and the costs of risk assessment for preeclampsia and early aspirin treatment, expressed in euros (€) in a hypothetical population of 100,000 women. We performed 1-way sensitivity analyses to assess the impact of adherence rates on model outcomes.

RESULTS

Application of the EXPECT, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, and Fetal Medicine Foundation models results in respectively 1.98%, 2.55%, and 1.90% of the women developing preeclampsia, as opposed to 3.00% of women in the case of no risk assessment. Overall, the net financial benefits of the EXPECT, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, and Fetal Medicine Foundation models relative to no risk assessment are €144, €43, and €38 per patient, respectively. The respective percentages of women receiving aspirin treatment are 18.6%, 10.2%, and 6.0% for the 3 risk assessment methods.

CONCLUSION

The EXPECT and Fetal Medicine Foundation model are comparable with regard to numbers of prevented preeclampsia cases, and both are superior to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence model and to no risk assessment. EXPECT is less resource-demanding and results in the highest cost savings, but also requires the highest number of women to be treated with aspirin. When deciding which strategy is preferable, cost savings and easier use have to be weighed against the degree of overtreatment, although low-dose aspirin has no clear disadvantages during pregnancy.

Low-Dose Aspirin after ASPRE-More Questions Than Answers? Current International Approach after PE Screening in the First Trimester

Preeclampsia (PE) is a multi-factorial disorder of pregnancy, and it continues to be one of the leading causes of fetal and maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Aspirin is universally recommended for high-risk women to reduce preeclampsia risk. The purpose of this review is to summarize the recommendations of various scientific societies on predicting preeclampsia and their indications for the inclusion of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) prophylaxis. Fourteen guidelines were compared. The recommended dose, screening method, and gestational age at the start of the test vary depending on the recommendation. The societies are inclined to recommend using increasingly higher doses (>75 mg) of ASA, with many encouraging doses from 100 mg upward. Most societies indicate that the optimal time for implementing aspirin is prior to 16 weeks' gestation. Following the publication of the Aspirin for Evidence-Based Preeclampsia Prevention (ASPRE) trial results and other papers evaluating the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) screening model, a large number of societies have changed their recommendations from those based on risk factors alone to the ones based on the risk assessment proposed by the FMF. This allows for the detection of a high-risk pregnancy population in whom aspirin will be remarkably effective in preventing preterm PE, thereby decreasing maternal and fetal morbidity.