The role of the GABAergic system in catatonia-Insights from clozapine and benzodiazepines

Lorazepam in catatonia - Past, present and future of a clinical success story

The effect of lorazepam in the treatment of catatonia is outstanding and almost immediate. Clinicians are familiar with its effects: mute patients can speak again, akinetic patients can move again and patients with negativism can eat and drink again within usually a short duration of about 10 min to 1-2 h. Fear is often gone after lorazepam administration. While not always effective, the introduction of lorazepam into clinical practice represented a breakthrough and was often life-saving for many patients suffering from catatonia. It is rare to observe such rapid therapeutic effects in other domains of psychiatry. In this narrative review we will briefly look at the past, present and future of lorazepam in the treatment of catatonia. It is gratifying to reflect on the fact that clinicians using the age-old medical practice of observation and empirical treatment succeeded in advancing the management of catatonia 40 years ago. The present evidence shows that the clinical effect of lorazepam in catatonia treatment is excellent and more or less immediate although it remains to be explicitly tested against other substances such as diazepam, zolpidem, clozapine, quetiapine, amantadine, memantine, valproate and dantrolene in randomized clinical trials. In addition, future studies need to answer the question how long lorazepam should be given to patients with catatonia, months or even years? This narrative review promotes the rapid use of lorazepam in the treatment of acute catatonic patients and stipulates further scientific examination of its often impressive clinical effects.

A preliminary genetic association study of GAD1 and GABAB receptor genes in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

GABAergic system dysfunction has been implicated in the etiology of schizophrenia and of cognitive impairments in particular. Patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) generally suffer from profound cognitive impairments in addition to severe positive symptoms, suggesting that GABA system dysfunction could be involved more closely in patients with TRS.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In the present study, exome sequencing was conducted on fourteen TRS patients, whereby four SNPs were identified on GAD1, GABBR1 and GABBR2 genes. An association study for five SNPs including these 4 SNPs and rs3749034 on GAD1 as then performed among 357 patients with TRS, 682 non-TRS patients and 508 healthy controls (HC). The results revealed no significant differences in allelic and/or genetic distributions for any of the five SNPs. However, several subanalyses in comparisons between schizophrenia and HC groups, as well as between the three groups, showed nominal-level significance for rs3749034 on GAD1 and rs10985765/rs3750344 on GABBR2. In particular, in comparisons of female subjects, rigorous analysis for rs3749034 showed a statistical difference between the schizophrenia and HC groups and between the TRS and HC groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Several positive results in subanalyses suggested that genetic vulnerability in the GABA system to schizophrenia or TRS could be affected by sex or sampling area, and overall, that rs3749034 on GAD1 and rs10985765 on GABBR2 could be related to TRS. In the present study, only a few SNPs were examined; it is possible that other important genetic variants in other regions of GABA-related genes were not captured in this preliminary study.

Catatonia: Clinical Overview of the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Clinical Challenges

Catatonia is a syndrome that has been associated with several mental illness disorders but that has also presented as a result of other medical conditions. Schizophrenia and other psychiatric disorders such as mania and depression are known to be associated with catatonia; however, several case reports have been published of certain medical conditions inducing catatonia, including hyponatremia, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, and liver transplantation. Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome and anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis are also prominent causes of catatonia. Patients taking benzodiazepines or clozapine are also at risk of developing catatonia following the withdrawal of these medications—it is speculated that the prolonged use of these medications increases gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) activity and that discontinuation may increase excitatory neurotransmission, leading to catatonia. The treatment of catatonia often involves the use of benzodiazepines, such as lorazepam, that can be used in combination therapy with antipsychotics. Definitive treatment may be found with electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Aberrant neuronal activity in different motor pathways, defective neurotransmitter regulation, and impaired oligodendrocyte function have all been proposed as the pathophysiology behind catatonia. There are many clinical challenges that come with catatonia and, as early treatment is associated with better outcomes, it becomes imperative to understand these challenges. The purpose of this manuscript is to provide an overview of these challenges and to look at clinical studies regarding the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of as well as the complications and risk factors associated with catatonia.

All roads lead to the motor cortex: psychomotor mechanisms and their biochemical modulation in psychiatric disorders

Psychomotor abnormalities have been abundantly observed in psychiatric disorders like major depressive disorder (MDD), bipolar disorder (BD), and schizophrenia (SCH). Although early psychopathological descriptions highlighted the truly psychomotor nature of these abnormalities, more recent investigations conceive them rather in purely motor terms. This has led to an emphasis of dopamine-based abnormalities in subcortical-cortical circuits including substantia nigra, basal ganglia, thalamus, and motor cortex. Following recent findings in MDD, BD, and SCH, we suggest a concept of psychomotor symptoms in the literal sense of the term by highlighting three specifically psychomotor (rather than motor) mechanisms including their biochemical modulation. These include: (i) modulation of dopamine- and substantia nigra-based subcortical-cortical motor circuit by primarily non-motor subcortical raphe nucleus and serotonin via basal ganglia and thalamus (as well as by other neurotransmitters like glutamate and GABA); (ii) modulation of motor cortex and motor network by non-motor cortical networks like default-mode network and sensory networks; (iii) global activity in cortex may also shape regional distribution of neural activity in motor cortex. We demonstrate that these three psychomotor mechanisms and their underlying biochemical modulation are operative in both healthy subjects as well as in MDD, BD, and SCH subjects; the only difference consists in the fact that these mechanisms are abnormally balanced and thus manifest in extreme values in psychiatric disorders. We conclude that psychomotor mechanisms operate in a dimensional and cross-nosological way as their degrees of expression are related to levels of psychomotor activity (across different disorders) rather than to the diagnostic categories themselves. Psychomotor mechanisms and their biochemical modulation can be considered paradigmatic examples of a dimensional approach as suggested in RDoC and the recently introduced spatiotemporal psychopathology.

Prevalence of catatonic signs and symptoms in an acute psychiatric unit from a tertiary psychiatric center in India

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of catatonia varies with the setting and type of rating scale used to measure catatonia. Catatonia, initially subsumed under schizophrenia, now is increasingly recognized in association with affective disorders.

AIM

We aimed to examine the prevalence of catatonia in an acute psychiatric inpatient unit in a tertiary center in India.

METHODS

Study subjects (n = 300) were randomly selected from amongst the inpatients over one year and evaluated within 24 h of admission using BFCRS and NCS, besides a sociodemographic and clinical proforma. During the inpatient stay MINI PLUS 5.0 was applied.

RESULTS

Among 300 inpatients recruited, 88 (29.3%) demonstrated at least one catatonic sign in either of the rating scales. As per the diagnostic cut-offs defined by BFCRS and NCS, the prevalence of catatonia syndrome was 49 (16.3%) and 32 (10.6%) respectively. The prevalence rates as per ICD-10 criteria and DSM-5 criteria were 19% and 5.3% respectively. The two most frequently noted signs - staring and withdrawal, were not listed as signs in either the ICD-10 or DSM V. The prevalence of catatonic symptoms was different in psychotic disorders in contrast to affective disorders. Severity of catatonia was associated with younger age, lesser duration of primary illness and prior episodes of catatonia.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of catatonia varies from 5.3% to 19% based on the criteria used. Identification warrants use of structured instruments. Catatonia is more severe in the initial years of illness, those with prior episodes of catatonia and in the younger age group.