Lipid-lowering therapy for primary prevention of premature atherosclerotic coronary artery disease: Eligibility, utilization, target achievement, and predictors of initiation

Cardiovascular risk and subclinical atherosclerosis in first-degree relatives of patients with premature cardiovascular disease

Background

Screening first-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with premature coronary artery disease (CAD) is recommended but not routinely performed.

Objectives

To assess the diagnostic yield and impact on clinical management of a clinical and imaging-based screening program of FDRs delivered in the setting of routine clinical care.

Methods

We recruited FDRs of patients with premature CAD with no personal history of CAD and prospectively assessed for: 1) cardiovascular risk and presence of significant subclinical atherosclerosis (SA) defined as plaque on carotid ultrasound, stenosis >50% or extensive atherosclerosis on coronary computed tomography angiography, or coronary artery calcium scores >100 Agatston units or >75% percentile for age and sex; 2) utilization of preventive medications and lipid levels prior enrolment and after completion of the assessment.

Results

We assessed 132 FDRs (60.6% females), mean (SD) age 47(17) years old. Cardiovascular risk was high in 38.2%, moderate in 12.2%, and low in 49.6% of FDRs. SA was present in 34.1% of FDRs, including 12.5% in low, 51.9% in moderate, and 55.0% in high calculated risk groups. After assessment, LLT was initiated in 32.6% of FDRs and intensified in 16.0% leading to mean (SD) LDL-C decrease of 1.07(1.10) mmol/L in patients with high calculated risk or SA. LLT was recommended to all patients with high calculated risk, but those with SA were more likely to receive the medications from pharmacies (93.3% vs 60.0%, p = 0.006).

Conclusion

Screening the FDRs of patients with premature CAD is feasible, may have high diagnostic yield and impact risk factor management.

Impact of Active vs Passive Statin Selection for Primary Prevention: The CorCal Vanguard Trial

Background

Statins can improve outcomes in high-risk primary prevention populations. However, application in clinical practice has lagged.

Objectives

The objective of this study was to compare an active vs a passive strategy (ie, usual care) to statin prescription for primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD).

Methods

A total of 3,770 patients ≥50 years of age without a history of ASCVD or statin use were invited to enroll in CorCal, with 601 consenting to participate. These patients were randomized 1:1 to statin initiation guided by the pooled cohort equation or by coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS). Outcomes (2.8-year follow-up) compared patients managed actively vs passively (randomly invited but declined or did not respond).

Results

Patient demographics were well matched. Statin recommendation was common among enrolled patients (41.7%). During follow-up, 25.3% of active patients were taking a statin vs 9.8% managed passively (P < 0.0001). Active patients had more lipid panels (median 2.0 vs 1.0), lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (109 vs 117 mg/dL) (both P < 0.0001), and a low rate of major adverse cardiovascular events during follow-up (0.6% vs 1.0%, P = 0.47). Statistical comparisons included t-tests, chi-squared tests, nonparametric tests, and time-to-event tests as appropriate.

Conclusions

An active approach to statin selection for primary ASCVD prevention identified a large treatment opportunity and led to over twice as many patients on statins compared to passive (usual care) management. A large CorCal Outcomes Trial is underway to more definitively assess the impact on outcomes of active management of statins for primary prevention.

Longitudinal Control of Lipid Levels in Patients With Premature Coronary Artery Disease

Background

Lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) is a central aspect of the treatment of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), and the benefits of LLT accrue over time. However, there are limited real-world data on longitudinal lipid control in patients with premature CAD.

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to assess longitudinal attainment of guideline-recommended lipid goals and outcomes in a contemporary cohort of patients with premature CAD.

Methods

We enrolled males younger than 50 years and females younger than 55 years with coronary stenosis of >50% and examined achievement of lipid goals, LLT characteristics, and cardiovascular outcomes (major adverse cardiovascular event [MACE]).

Results

Of 476 patients who presented with acute coronary syndrome (ST-elevation myocardial infarction, non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, unstable angina) (68%), stable angina (28%), or other symptoms, 73.2% achieved low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) <1.8 mmol/L on at least 1 occasion, but only 27.3% consistently stayed in the target range for 3 years after diagnosis. Although 73.9% of patients received high-intensity LLT at the time of diagnosis, only 43.5% had good adherence over the following 3 years. In multivariable analysis, 1 mmol/L increase in time-weighted average exposure to LDL-C, but not the lowest achieved LDL-C, was associated with a higher risk of MACE, hazard ratio 2.02 (95% CI: 1.48-2.76), when adjusted for sex, age, hypertension, diabetes, and smoking.

Conclusions

We found low rates of longitudinal lipid target achievement in patients with premature CAD. Cumulative LDL-C exposure, but not lowest achieved LDL-C, was associated with risk of MACE. This highlights the critical importance of longitudinal control of lipids levels and identifies opportunities to improve LLT and maximize the time-dependent benefits of lipid-lowering.

Familial Hypercholesterolemia, Familial Combined Hyperlipidemia, and Elevated Lipoprotein(a) in Patients With Premature Coronary Artery Disease

BACKGROUND

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), familial combined hyperlipidemia (FCHL), and elevated lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) increase risk of premature coronary artery disease (CAD). The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of FH, FCHL, elevated Lp(a) and their impact on management in patients with premature CAD.

METHODS

We prospectively recruited men ≤ 50 years and women ≤ 55 with obstructive CAD. FH was defined as Dutch Lipid Clinic Network scores ≥ 6. FCHL was defined as apolipoprotein B > 1.2 g/L, triglyceride and total cholesterol > 90th population percentile, and family history of premature cardiovascular disease. Lp(a) ≥ 50 mg/dL was considered to be elevated.

RESULTS

Among 263 participants, 9.1% met criteria for FH, 12.5% for FCHL, and 19.4% had elevated Lp(a). Among patients with FH, 37.5% had FH-causing DNA variants. Patients with FH, but not other dyslipidemias, were more likely than nondyslipidemic patients to have received lipid-lowering therapy before presenting with CAD (33.3% vs 12.3%, P = 0.04) and combined lipid-lowering therapy after the presentation (41.7% vs 7.7%, P < 0.001). One year after presentation, 58.3%, 54.5%, and 58.8% of patients with FH, FCHL, and elevated Lp(a) had low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) < 1.8 mmol/L, respectively, compared with 68.0 % in reference group. Patients with FCHL were more likely to have non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and apolipoprotein B above recommended lipid goals (70.0% and 87.9%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

FH, FCHL, and elevated Lp(a) are common in patients with premature CAD and have differing impact on treatment and achievement of lipid targets. Assessment for these conditions in patients with premature CAD provides valuable information for individualized management.