Daratumumab for antibody-mediated rejection: Is it time to target the real culprit?

The use of haploidentical stem cell transplant as an alternative donor source in patients with decreased access to matched unrelated donors

INTRODUCTION

The likelihood of finding HLA-matched unrelated donors for rare HLA types and non-white European ancestry continues to be a challenge with less than a 70% chance of finding a full match. Mismatched transplants continue to have high rates of transplant-related mortality. With the near-universal ability to find a haploidentical donor in families, haploidentical transplants have become of more critical importance in ethnic minority groups and patients with rare HLA types.

METHODS

Data was collected through clinical trials, review articles, and case reports published in the National Library of Medicine.

RESULTS

The use of improved lymphodepleting conditioning regimens, graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis using regimens such as post-transplant cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate, and tacrolimus have improved engraftment to nearly 100 percent and reduced transplant-related mortality to less than 20 percent. Attention to donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) with interventions using bortezomib, rituximab, and plasmapheresis has decreased graft failure rates.

CONCLUSION

With improved prevention of GVHD with interventions such as post-transplant cyclophosphamide and management of DSAs, haploidentical transplants continue to improve transplant-related mortality (TRM) compared to patients who received matched-related donor transplants. While TRM continues to improve, ongoing research with haploidentical transplants will focus on improving graft and donor immunosuppression and identifying the best regimens to improve TRM without compromising relapse-free survival.

Antiplasma cell antibodies: A new era of human leukocyte antigen antibody control in solid organ transplantation

New therapies directed against plasma cells such as anti-CD38 antibodies and the bispecific anti-B cell maturation antigen antibodies, represent not only an important advance in the treatment of multiple myeloma but have the potential to change the treatment landscape of other antibody-mediated diseases. In solid organ transplantation, the therapeutic armamentarium targeting humoral alloimmune responses in desensitization of highly sensitized transplant candidates and posttransplant antibody-mediated rejection has lagged behind advances in preventing and treating T cell-mediated rejection. Intravenous immunoglobulin and plasmapheresis are used extensively but have limited efficacy. Currently available anti-CD20 antibodies are only partially effective in achieving B cell depletion and leaving mature plasma cells untouched. Although interleukin 6 plays an important role in the humoral alloimmune response and injury, the benefits of interleukin 6 inhibition have failed to be demonstrated in clinical trials. Even proteasome inhibitors developed specifically to target plasma cells have not fulfilled their promise, due to limited efficacy as single agents. This review focuses on the recent experience with, and potential applicability of, anti-CD38 antibodies in the field of organ transplantation and experimental data supporting their use and development for human leukocyte antigen desensitization and antibody-mediated rejection.

Perspective for Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA in Antibody-Mediated Rejection After Kidney Transplantation: Defining Context of Use and Clinical Implications

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is a major cause of graft failure limiting long-term graft survival after kidney transplantation. Current diagnostic strategy to detect AMR is suboptimal and requires further improvement. Previously suggested treatment regimens for AMR could not demonstrate efficacy, however novel therapeutic agents are currently under investigation. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is a novel non-invasive biomarker for allograft injury, that has been mainly studied in the context of rejection. Its short-half-life in circulation and injury-dependent release are its key advantages that contribute to its superior diagnostic accuracy, compared to traditional biomarkers. Moreover, previous studies showed that dd-cfDNA-release is well-linked to histological and molecular features of AMR, and thus able to reflect real-time injury. Further observations suggest that dd-cfDNA can be used as a suitable screening tool for early detection of AMR in patients with donor-specific-anti-HLA-antibodies (DSA), as well as for monitoring AMR activity after anti-rejection treatment. The weight of evidence suggests that the integration of dd-cfDNA in the graft surveillance of patients with AMR, or those suspicious of AMR (e.g., due to the presence of donor-specific anti-HLA-antibodies) has an added value and might have a positive impact on outcomes in this specific cohort.

Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA as a Companion Biomarker for AMR Treatment With Daratumumab: Case Series

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is among the most frequent causes for graft loss after kidney transplantation. While there are no approved therapies, several case reports with daratumumab and the very recent phase 2 trial of felzartamab in AMR have indicated the potential efficacy of therapeutic interventions targeting CD38. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is an emerging biomarker with injury-specific release and a short half-life, which could facilitate early diagnosis of AMR and monitoring of treatment response. We describe two cases of patients with chronic active AMR, who were treated with monthly daratumumab infusions, and in whom donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) was measured longitudinally to monitor treatment response. In both patients, daratumumab treatment led to stabilization of kidney function parameters, a strong decline of dd-cfDNA below the previously established threshold for rejection, and partial or complete histologic resolution of AMR activity. Our case series suggests that dd-cfDNA may be a useful companion biomarker for longitudinal monitoring of anti-CD38 treatment in patients with AMR.

Systematic Biopsy-Based Transcriptomics and Diagnosis of Antibody-Mediated Kidney Transplant Rejection in Clinical Practice

Key Points

Background

To diagnose kidney transplant antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), biopsy-based transcriptomics can substitute for some histological criteria according to the Banff classification. However, clinical accessibility of these assays is still limited. Here, we aimed to evaluate the impact of integrating a routine-compatible molecular assay for the diagnosis of AMR in clinical practice.

Methods

All biopsies performed in our center between 2013 and 2017 were retrospectively included. These biopsies were classified into three groups: AMR biopsies which displayed the full Banff criteria of AMR independently of biopsy-based transcriptomics; undetermined for AMR biopsies which did not meet AMR histological criteria, but would have been considered as AMR if biopsy-based transcriptomics had been positive; and control biopsies which showed no features of rejection.

Results

Within the inclusion period, 342 biopsies had a complete Banff scoring. Thirty-six of the biopsies already met AMR criteria, and 43 of 306 (14%) were considered as undetermined for AMR. Among these biopsies, 24 of 43 (56%) had a molecular signature of AMR, reclassifying them into the AMR category. Five-year death-censored survival of these biopsies was unfavorable and statistically equivalent to that of the AMR category (P = 0.22), with 15 of 24 (63%) graft loss.

Conclusions

A significant proportion of biopsies could benefit from a biopsy-based transcriptomics for AMR diagnosis according to the Banff classification. Using a routine-compatible molecular tool, more than the half of these biopsies were reclassified as AMR and associated with poor allograft survival.

A Randomized Phase 2 Trial of Felzartamab in Antibody-Mediated Rejection

BACKGROUND

Antibody-mediated rejection is a leading cause of kidney-transplant failure. The targeting of CD38 to inhibit graft injury caused by alloantibodies and natural killer (NK) cells may be a therapeutic option.

METHODS

In this phase 2, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we assigned patients with antibody-mediated rejection that had occurred at least 180 days after transplantation to receive nine infusions of the CD38 monoclonal antibody felzartamab (at a dose of 16 mg per kilogram of body weight) or placebo for 6 months, followed by a 6-month observation period. The primary outcome was the safety and side-effect profile of felzartamab. Key secondary outcomes were renal-biopsy results at 24 and 52 weeks, donor-specific antibody levels, peripheral NK-cell counts, and donor-derived cell-free DNA levels.

RESULTS

A total of 22 patients underwent randomization (11 to receive felzartamab and 11 to receive placebo). The median time from transplantation until trial inclusion was 9 years. Mild or moderate infusion reactions occurred in 8 patients in the felzartamab group. Serious adverse events occurred in 1 patient in the felzartamab group and in 4 patients in the placebo group; graft loss occurred in 1 patient in the placebo group. At week 24, resolution of morphologic antibody-mediated rejection was more frequent with felzartamab (in 9 of 11 patients [82%]) than with placebo (in 2 of 10 patients [20%]), for a difference of 62 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], 19 to 100) and a risk ratio of 0.23 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.06 to 0.83). The median microvascular inflammation score was lower in the felzartamab group than in the placebo group (0 vs. 2.5), for a mean difference of -1.95 (95% CI, -2.97 to -0.92). Also lower was a molecular score reflecting the probability of antibody-mediated rejection (0.17 vs. 0.77) and the level of donor-derived cell-free DNA (0.31% vs. 0.82%). At week 52, the recurrence of antibody-mediated rejection was reported in 3 of 9 patients who had a response to felzartamab, with an increase in molecular activity and biomarker levels toward baseline levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Felzartamab had acceptable safety and side-effect profiles in patients with antibody-mediated rejection. (Funded by MorphoSys and Human Immunology Biosciences; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05021484; and EUDRACT number, 2021-000545-40.).

Successful Desensitization with Imlifidase and Daratumumab in a Highly Immunized, Crossmatch Positive, Blood Group-Incompatible Living-Donor Re-Transplant Recipient with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Introduction

The transplantation of highly sensitized patients remains a major obstacle. Immunized patients wait longer for a transplant if not prioritized, and if transplanted, their transplant outcome is worse.

Case Presentation

We report a successful AB0- and HLA-incompatible living donor kidney transplantation in a 35-year-old female patient with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and antiphospholipid syndrome. The patient had a positive T- and B-cell complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) crossmatch and previous graft loss due to renal vein thrombosis. We treated the patient with intravenous immunoglobulins, rituximab, horse anti-thymocyte globulin, daratumumab, and imlifidase, besides standard immunosuppression. All IgG antibodies were sensitive to imlifidase treatment. Besides donor-specific HLA antibodies, anti-dsDNA antibodies and antiphospholipid antibodies were cleaved. The patient initially had delayed graft function. Two kidney biopsies (day 7 and day 14) revealed acute tubular necrosis without signs of HLA antibody-mediated rejection. On posttransplant day 30, hemodialysis was stopped, and creatinine levels declined over the next weeks to a baseline creatinine of about 1.7 mg/dL after 12 months.

Conclusion

In this case, a novel multimodal treatment strategy including daratumumab and imlifidase enabled successful kidney transplantation for a highly immunized patient with antiphospholipid antibodies.

Biopsy-based transcriptomics in the diagnosis of kidney transplant rejection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The last year has seen considerable progress in translational research exploring the clinical utility of biopsy-based transcriptomics of kidney transplant biopsies to enhance the diagnosis of rejection. This review will summarize recent findings with a focus on different platforms, potential clinical applications, and barriers to clinical adoption.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent literature has focussed on using biopsy-based transcriptomics to improve diagnosis of rejection, in particular antibody-mediated rejection. Different techniques of gene expression analysis (reverse transcriptase quantitative PCR, microarrays, probe-based techniques) have been used either on separate samples with ideally preserved RNA, or on left over tissue from routine biopsy processing. Despite remarkable consistency in overall patterns of gene expression, there is no consensus on acceptable indications, or whether biopsy-based transcriptomics adds significant value at reasonable cost to current diagnostic practice.

SUMMARY

Access to biopsy-based transcriptomics will widen as regulatory approvals for platforms and gene expression models develop. Clinicians need more evidence and guidance to inform decisions on how to use precious biopsy samples for biopsy-based transcriptomics, and how to integrate results with standard histology-based diagnosis.

Daratumumab treatment in six highly sensitised solid organ transplant recipients: A case series and literature review

We report data on six kidney or heart recipients who were administered daratumumab to treat or prevent antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). To date, data are scarce concerning the use of daratumumab in solid organ transplantation and most reports show a decrease in donor-specific antigen (DSA) levels and an improvement in ABMR using a multiple myeloma daratumumab administration scheme, that is, with sequential systematic administration. Here, we report on the efficacy of daratumumab 1/ in reducing the histological signs of ABMR, 2/ in reducing the ability of DSA to bind to donor cells in vitro through negativation of flow cytometry crossmatching, 3/ in preferentially being directed towards antibodies sharing epitopes, suggesting that daratumumab may specifically target activated plasma cells, 4/ and when administered as a single dose. This last point suggests, for the first time, that, as for rituximab in auto-immune diseases, the scheme for daratumumab administration could be different for targeting DSA-producing plasma cells than for tumour cells.