Grafted tubularised incised-plate urethroplasty: An objective assessment of outcome with lessons learnt from surgical experience with 263 cases

Surgical and functional outcomes of Dorsal Inlay Graft urethroplasty in revision vs primary hypospadias repair in the pediatric age

INTRODUCTION

Over the years, Dorsal Inlay Graft (DIG) urethroplasty has gained worldwide acceptance for primary hypospadias repair. However, its safety and effectiveness for revision surgery are yet to be proven.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to assess and compare complication rates and functional outcomes of DIG surgery in revision versus primary hypospadias repair.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We carried out a retrospective analysis of data collected from 53 consecutive DIG urethroplasties performed by a single surgeon at our institution. Patients were stratified in two groups - primary repair and redo-urethroplasty. For each group, we recorded standard pre-operative characteristics, surgical technicalities, complication rates and uroflowmetry parameters.

RESULTS

Out of 53 DIG urethroplasties, 21 (39.6 %) where primary and 32 (60.4 %) were re-do. As expected, the two groups differed for median age at surgery: 20 months for primary and 68.5 months for revision surgery (p < 0.001). Additionally, all 21 (100 %) primary interventions were performed with a preputial graft, whereas among revision DIG urethroplasties only 2 (6.3 %) where preputial and 30 (93.8 %) were buccal (p < 0.001). Catheterization time (7 vs 8 days, p = 0.155) and postoperative complication rates (14.3 % vs 9.4 %, p = 0.581) were comparable between the primary and revision surgery group, respectively (all p > .05). Forty-two of the 53 patients underwent uroflowmetry during follow-up. Of these, 19 (63 %) patients presented with abnormal uroflowmetry and 11 (37 %) had equivocal parameters with no difference between the two groups.

DISCUSSION

Dorsal Inlay Graft urethroplasty has long been known to be safe and effective for primary hypospadias repair. On the other hand, data on dorsal inlay graft urethroplasty as a salvage surgery after primary hypospadias repair failure is scarce. Surprisingly, according to our findings, surgical outcomes and complication rates are comparable between primary and revision hypospadias cases. Additionally, our results in the redo group are absolutely encouraging if compared to those reported in the literature for the same subset of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

According to our findings, DIG urethroplasty is a safe and effective option to treat revision hypospadias repair.

Tubularized incised plate urethroplasty and grafted tubularized incised plate urethroplasty: systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

Background

Hypospadias is one of the most common genital birth defects. There are around 300 various techniques available for the repair of hypospadias. This study aims to compare the reported outcomes of Tubularized incised plate urethroplasty (TIP) and Grafted TIP (GTIP) repair in children undergoing primary hypospadias repair.

Methods

This meta-analysisadhered to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, and we framed our research question using the population, intervention, control and outcomes format. We conducted comprehensive electronic searches across various databases, employing a Boolean search strategy with predefined search terms. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included for quantitative analysis.

Results

Totally, 10 RCTs met our inclusion criteria for quantitative analysis. The results indicated that urethrocutaneous fistula, glans dehiscence, and stricture rates were comparable between the two groups. The incidence of meatal stenosis was found to be significantly lower in the GTIP group with a relative risk (RR) of 0.32 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.15 to 0.67).

Conclusion

The coucomes UCF, glans dehiscence, and stricture rates were comparable between the two groups. Notably, the incidence of meatal stenosis was found to be significantly lower in the grafted TIP group. In terms of operative time, our quantitative synthesis demonstrated that the TIP group had a shorter operative time than the GTIP group with significant heterogeneity.

Dorsal inlay inner preputial graft repair versus ventral-only preputial graft repair in primary distal penile hypospadias with narrow urethral plate

Background

Tubularized incised plate (TIP) is the most common technique used for distal hypospadias repair with good outcome but with a high rate of urethral stricture. Inner preputial-free graft can be used as an inlay graft in the incised area of the narrow urethral plate, also can be used as an onlay graft for urethroplasty in hypospadias repair to avoid this complication.

Patients and Methods

A comparative prospective randomized study was conducted on two groups of hypospadias patients with narrow urethral plate. Group A: dorsal inlay inner preputial graft repair was performed (grafted TIP [G-TIP]) and Group B: ventral onlay preputial graft repair was performed. The assessment of outcome and hypospadias objective scoring evaluation (HOSE) score was done at 2 weeks and 6 months.

Results

Group A included 55 patients for whom dorsal inlay inner preputial graft repair was performed (G-TIP), and Group B which was planned to be conducted on 55 patients using onlay preputial graft (onlay graft) but was terminated after 15 cases due to high failure rate (33%). Group A showed better success rate 96% and better HOSE score (score 16) at 2 months and 6 months 83.6% and 88.2% versus 26.7% and 33.3% in Group B. Postoperative complications showed a statistically significant difference; glans dehiscence (3.6% vs. 40%), wound infection (1.8% vs. 33.3%), and skin sloughing (3.6% vs. 26.7%) in Groups A and B, respectively.

Conclusion

G-TIP is a good technique for the management of distal hypospadias with narrow urethral plate with good success rate, cosmetic outcome, and with less complications compared to onlay graft.

Hybrid Mathieu Urethroplasty vs. Tubularized Incised Plate Urethroplasty for the Management of Distal Penile Hypospadias With a Small Glans

INTRODUCTION

Distal hypospadias is a common anomaly. Different surgical techniques have evolved through the years to manage this anomaly. Several factors may affect the prognosis. One of them is glans size. We compared the hybrid Mathieu urethroplasty (HMU) and the tubularized incised plate urethroplasty (TIPU) for the management of distal hypospadias with a small glans.

METHODS

Sixty-eight patients with distal hypospadias were included and categorized into two groups. Group A (n = 33) and group B (n = 35) patients were treated by HMU and TIPU, respectively. All patients had a small glans. In group A, the patients underwent Mathieu urethroplasty plus a deep incision of the urethral plate. In group B, the patients underwent TIPU. Urethral stents were used in all cases. Hypospadias objective score evaluation (HOSE) was used to assess the results.

RESULTS

Urethrocutaneous fistulae developed in two cases in group A and six cases in group B. Meatal stenosis was significantly lower (one case in group A vs. eight cases in group B). Glanular dehiscence occurred in two cases in group A and five cases in group B. The small glans strongly correlated with the development of both urethrocutaneous fistulae and meatal stenosis where the odd ratios were 3.500 (1.383-7.879) and 9.481 (1.114-12.669), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Both techniques showed efficacy during management of patients with a small glans. HMU had better outcomes, shorter duration of stent and lesser incidence of complications than TIPU. Small glans was significantly related to urethrocutaneous fistulae and meatal stenosis in group B.

Cosmetic outcomes of grafted tubularized incised plate urethroplasty in primary distal penile hypospadias: prospective comparative study with the classic Snodgrass repair

Background

To compare the outcomes between classic tubularized incised plate (C-TIP), known as Snodgrass urethroplasty, and grafted TIP (G-TIP) in the repair of primary distal penile hypospadias.

Methods

Parents of all children presented to our tertiary care institution with primary distal penile hypospadias were asked to participate in this study. Patients were equally randomized using closed envelope method into two groups; Group A underwent repair using G-TIP and Group B underwent repair using the C-TIP. Circumcised cases and/or cases with penile chordee > 30 degrees were excluded from this study. Urethral catheter was kept for 7 to 10 days after surgery. The success rate and cosmetic outcomes assessed by HOSE score were evaluated at 6-month postoperatively.

Results

A total of 55 patients were recruited in each group. One hundred and seven patients of the 110 patients (54 and 53 in groups A and B, respectively) were evaluated at 6-month postoperatively using HOSE score. All preoperative data were comparable in both groups. Success was documented in 49/54 patients (90.7%) in group A. The five failures were secondary to two cases of glans dehiscence and three cases of residual postoperative chordee. Whereas, success was documented in 48/53 patients (90.5%) in group B. Complications were: a case of meatal stenosis, three cases of fistula, and a case of combined meatal stenosis and fistula. The HOSE score was comparable between the two groups (15.4 ± 1.09 vs. 15.6 ± 0.55; p = 0.29). However, the operative time was statistically longer in the G-TIP compared with the C-TIP (91.4 ± 6.2 min vs. 85.2 ± 6.3 min; p < 0.001), respectively.

Conclusion

The G-TIP urethroplasty provided comparable results with C-TIP in terms of cosmoses, success rate, and complications. However, G-TIP was accompanied with significantly longer operative time.

Are there any benefits of using an inlay graft in the treatment of primary hypospadias in children? A systematic review and metanalysis

INTRODUCTION

Dorsal inlay graft urethroplasty (DIGU) has been described as an effective method for hypospadias repair with the proposed advantage of reducing the risk of complications. We aimed to systematically assess whether DIGU has any additional advantages over standard tubularized incised plate urethroplasty (TIPU) repair in children with primary hypospadias.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement. The a priori protocol is available at the PROSPERO database (CRD42020168305). A literature search was conducted for relevant publications from 1946 until January 10, 2020 in seven different databases. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), comparative studies (TIPU vs DIGU) and single arm case series (>20 cases) of DIGU were eligible for inclusion. Secondary hypospadias, two-stage repairs, disorders of sex development, significant curvature of >30°, and a mean or median follow-up of less than 12 months were excluded.

DISCUSSION

A total of 499 articles were screened and 14 studies (3 RCTs, 5 non-randomized studies (NRSs), and 6 case series) with a total of 1753 children (distal: 1334 (76%) and proximal: 419 (24%)) were found eligible. Mean follow-up of the studies was between 16 and 77 months. DIGU was found superior to TIPU in decreasing meatal/neourethral stenosis (p = 0.02, 95% CI 0.02-0.78). All other parameters were found comparable including overall complications, fistula and glans dehiscence rates. Success rates were similar among the groups ranging between 48% and 96% for DIGU and 43-96% in the TIPU group. The lack of standardization in the definition of complications and success was the major limitation of this study.

CONCLUSIONS

Using an inlay graft during primary hypospadias repair decreases the risk of meatal/neourethral stenosis. However, current evidence does not demonstrate superiority of DIGU over TIPU in terms of treatment success and overall complication rates.

Narrow urethral plate augmentation in anterior and middle hypospadias repair: Onlay flap VS. Inlay graft. A prospective randomized comparative study

INTRODUCTION

The measurement of the urethral plate width (as an objective parameter) and its effect of this width on the results of tubularized incised plate urethroplasty (TIPU) have been reported in two series and both authors reported that a urethral plate width < 8 mm is associated with higher complication rates. The augmentation of the urethral plate either by dorsal inlay graft urethroplasty (DIGU) or Onlay flap has been compared with the original TIPU in different degrees of hypospadias with better surgical results in augmented cases.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the surgical results of longitudinal Onlay preputial flap (LOF) vs (DIGU) techniques in augmentation of the narrow urethral plate.

STUDY DESIGN

Primary anterior and middle hypospadias cases with narrow urethral plates were randomly allocated into two groups; group one operated by DIGU and group two operated by (LOF). The Success rate, individual complication rate, and operative times were compared.

RESULTS

39 cases completed the study. No significant differences in patients' characteristics were detected. In the DIGU group, one case (5.3%) complicated with fistula and glandular dehiscence wherein in the LOF group, 7 cases (35%) Complicated with 5 fistulae, 2 glanular dehiscences, one flap loss, one diverticulum (p= .02). No significant differences in the rates of individual complications.

DISCUSSION

Variables affecting the success of hypospadias repairs are many. Urethral plate quality is an important variable among these variables. The definition of urethral plate quality is usually subjective. In the DIGU group, only 1/19 (5.3%) case had two complications, fistula and glandular dehiscence. Mouravas et al., in their comparative study between TIPU and G-TIP without mention of urethral plate width reported a significant reduction of the overall complications and urethral stenosis without significant reduction in fistula rate. In their G-TIP group, only 2 cases out of 24 (8.3%) were complicated with one fistula and one glandular dehiscence where in the TIPU group, 7 cases (30.4%) were complicated with one glandular dehiscence and 6 cases with urethral stenosis. In the LOF group, fistula in 5/20 cases (25%) was the commonest complication followed by glandular dehiscence in 2 cases (10%). Diverticulum and flap loss occurred in one case for each (5%). In the multivariate analysis of 474 patients' cohort by Spinoit et al., there were no significant differences between the risk of re-intervention after TIP and Onlay flap in anterior and middle hypospadias (25.8% vs. 18.8%), and (22.2% vs. 20%) respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that augmentation of the narrow urethral plate with DIGU has a better surgical outcome than with LOF. No significant difference in cosmetic outcomes detected.

Comparing the outcomes of tubularized incised plate urethroplasty and dorsal inlay graft urethroplasty in children with hypospadias: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Excellent outcomes have been reported following the widely accepted tubularized incised plate urethroplasty (TIPU) and its relatively recent modification, the dorsal inlay graft urethroplasty (DIGU). However, there is a lack of consensus on which technique offers more favorable postoperative outcomes.

AIMS

To systematically compare the reported outcomes of the TIPU and DIGU techniques in children undergoing primary hypospadias repair.

DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies.

METHODS

An electronic database search was conducted up to May 2018. Sources included Medline, Embase, Cochrane library, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Google Scholar as well as trial registries and grey literature sources. Studies were selected if they compared the postoperative complications of TIPU and DIGU in children. Secondary outcomes included standardized cosmetic scores and urinary flow studies. A meta-analysis of reported complications was performed using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Two randomized, two prospective, and two retrospective studies met the inclusion criteria. TIPU and DIGU were performed in 350 and 267 patients, respectively. Pooled analysis did not demonstrate a significant difference regarding postoperative urethrocutaneous fistula, meatal/urethral stenosis, wound dehiscence, or total complications. Subgroup analysis according to hypospadias severity did not alter initial findings. Statistical analysis of secondary outcomes was not feasible due to insufficient data. Most studies were of low methodological quality with a high risk of bias.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no strong evidence to suggest that either technique offers more favorable outcomes. Until more robust randomized trials exist, decisions regarding the appropriate repair should be based on the surgeon's experience and outcomes.

Snodgrass vs Snodgraft operation to repair the distal hypospadias in the narrow urethral plate

BACKGROUND

Using the Snodgraft technique in patients with urethral plate less than 8 mm to repair distal hypospadias is still debatable. Some authors assume that augmentation may be beneficial. We aimed to compare the outcomes of the Snodgrass vs Snodgraft procedure in patients with a narrow urethral plate less than 8 mm.

METHODOLOGY

This prospective randomized study included 60 children who had been treated by the Snodgrass or Snodgraft procedure for repair of distal penile hypospadias with narrow urethral plate from March 2017 to September 2018. They were randomized into two subgroups. Group 1 (30 patients) underwent tubularized incised plate urethroplasty, whereas the second group (30 patients) underwent the Snodgraft procedure by using the inner prepuce. Operative details, postoperative period, and complications were reported and statistically analyzed using IBM SPSS software package version 20.0.

RESULTS

The operative time was longer for patients who underwent the Snodgraft procedure: 78 (55-95) and 110 (80-140) minutes in groups 1 and 2, respectively. In group 1, there was one case of meatal stenosis which was resolved by urethral dilation using the local anesthetic cream in the outpatient clinic. In addition, there was another case of distal penile fistula. In group 2, there was a case of complete wound disruption and another of distal penile fistula. There was no significant difference in the complication rate in any group.

CONCLUSION

The operative time was longer in group 2 than in group 1 but with comparable outcomes. The Snodgraft procedure is not superior to the Snodgrass operation in the narrow healthy urethral plate.