Lingual mucosal graft two-stage Bracka technique for redo hypospadias repair

Evaluation of the Extent of Primary Buccal Mucosal Graft Contracture in Augmentation Urethroplasty for Stricture Urethra: A Prospective Observational Study at a Tertiary Healthcare Centre

Introduction

Buccal mucosal graft (BMG) urethroplasty is considered as gold standard in the treatment of urethral stricture disease. The successful outcome after BMG urethroplasty varies between 66 and 99%. One of the possible causes for failure is BMG contracture. Primary BMG contracture rate is poorly understood and unreported. The present study aimed to evaluate the extent of contracture of buccal mucosa immediately after harvesting.

Materials and Methods

This was a prospective observational study conducted in the Department of Urology at our institute between January 2016 and December 2019. All patients with urethral stricture disease undergoing BMG urethroplasty for the first time were enrolled in the study after obtaining informed consent. Demographic and patient clinical profile was noted. Based on the intraoperative urethral stricture size, the preharvest graft was marked on the buccal mucosa and the size was calculated. Postharvest unstretched size of the graft was measured immediately after graft removal from the oral cavity. Alteration in BMG size was analysed using paired t-test.

Results

Forty-four patients were included in the study. Mean age of the patient was 53.6 years. Mean stricture length was 7.45 cm (range 4–12 cm). Mean pre- and postharvest BMG size was 8.3 × 1.5 cm and 7.6 × 1.3 cm, respectively. There was a 8.4% decrease in length and 9.5% decrease in width of the buccal mucosal graft.

Conclusion

Primary buccal mucosal graft contracture is around 8.4% in length and 9.5% in width. It would be better to mark wider than necessary while harvesting buccal mucosa so that tension-free anastomosis is performed.

Upper lip graft (ULG) for redo urethroplasties in children. A step by step video

PURPOSE

Lower lip and cheek are commonly used sources of buccal mucosa grafts for urethroplasty. In recent years, aiming to improve the donor site morbidity, our preference changed to the use (ULG). The aim of this video is to illustrate the technical details of the ULG harvesting for children.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The inner surface of the upper lip is exposed by two stay sutures. The frenulum is spared, the mucosa to be harvested is marked and local submucosal infiltration is done with a solution of bupivacaine plus epinephrine. The edges are incised ant the submucosa plane created with a scissor. The graft is detached, defatted, and applied with quilting stitches over the recipient site with the standard technique. Hemostasis is secured and the donor site is left open.

RESULTS

From 2015 to 2018, 25 ULG harvests were done in 24 patients. Only one (5%) presented local pain associated to the procedure in the first 24 h. After minimum 2 months after surgery, none of the patients presented perioral nubmness, difficulty with mouth opening, contraction of the donor site or changes in salivation.

CONCLUSIONS

ULG harvest is easy and a suitable alternative source of oral mucosa for urethroplasty in children.

Dorsal onlay urethroplasty using lingual mucosal grafts for lichen sclerosis anterior urethral strictures repair: Long-term outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term outcomes of dorsal onlay urethroplasty using lingual mucosal graft for repairing urethral strictures associated with genital lichen sclerosis.

METHODS

This study included 36 patients who had lichen sclerosis long anterior urethral strictures that were managed with dorsal onlay urethroplasty using lingual mucosal graft, and were followed up ≥5 years. Preoperatively, we measured the maximum urinary flow rate and the International Prostate Symptom Score, then every 3 months in the first year, and annually thereafter. During follow up, patients with obstructive symptoms were subjected to urethrography and/ or urethroscopy. A successful urethroplasty was defined as normal voiding and no need for further intervention.

RESULTS

Of the 36 patients, two were lost during the follow up, thus 34 patients were involved in the assessment. After lingual mucosal graft urethroplasty, there were significant improvements in maximum urinary flow rate and International Prostate Symptom Score (P < 0.0001). This improvement was sustained during the 5-year follow-up period. The median follow-up period was 66.5 months (interquartile range 64-70 months). The overall success rate in this study was 88.2%. Postoperative complications that required intervention were reported within the first year in four (11.8%) patients. Oral site complications were mild in the early postoperative period with no long-term complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Dorsal onlay urethroplasty using lingual mucosal graft is a reliable and durable procedure for repairing lichen sclerosis urethral stricture. It provides a long-term success rate with few failures occurring within the first year. Lingual mucosal graft harvesting is associated with minor, immediate oral complications, and no long-term morbidity.

Outcomes of staged lingual mucosal graft urethroplasty for redo hypospadias repair

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to present the outcomes for redo hypospadias repair using lingual mucosal graft (LMG).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between June 2012 and February 2017, 47 patients underwent staged LMG urethroplasty for redo hypospadias repair. The inclusion criteria were previous failed hypospadias repair with a paucity of local skin that interferes with correction using skin flaps and demands graft urethroplasty. During the first stage, a well-vascularized bed on the tunica albuginea was created. Then, the harvested LMG was secured to the prepared bed. The second-stage urethroplasty was carried out after six months. In this stage, tubularization of the previously implanted LMG was performed. In four cases, tubularization was difficult owing to graft contracture. This difficulty was managed by using the dorsally degloved penile skin as the onlay island flap in three cases and the buccal mucosa onlay graft in the fourth case. In all cases, a second protective layer from the dartos or tunica vaginalis was developed to cover the neourethra.

RESULTS

The median (interquartile range [IQR]) age of patients at the first stage was 5 (4-6) years, and the median (IQR) duration between both stages was 7 (6-8) months. The median (IQR) follow-up after the second stage was 15 (13-16) months. The median (IQR) number of previous operations was 2 (2-3). The median (IQR) length of the LMG was 3 (2.5-4) cm, and the median (IQR) width was 1 (1-2) cm. No donor-site major complications, but mild oral discomfort in the first week after graft harvesting, were reported in 39 (83%) patients. After the second stage, complications were reported in nine (19.2%) patients, meatal stenosis in five and fistula in four. The reported success rate was 80.9%.

DISCUSSION

Reconstruction of previously failed hypospadias is a challenge owing to local tissue scarring and a paucity of adjacent healthy tissue. In this study, the LMG was used in two-stage redo hypospadias repair after previous repair failure. In the present study, a success rate of 80.9% was reported after the second stage. According to this study and the published series, harvesting the LMG is associated with minimal immediate donor-site complications and no long-term morbidity. Another advantage of the LMG is easy harvesting with effortlessly reachable tongue in comparison with the buccal mucosa that is deep and requires application of a mouth retractor.

CONCLUSIONS

Two-stage LMG urethroplasty is a reliable procedure for salvage urethroplasty. Lingual mucosal graft harvesting is easy, with minor oral complications.