1
|
Tan GH, Deniffel D, Finelli A, Wettstein M, Ahmad A, Zlotta A, Fleshner N, Hamilton R, Kulkarni G, Nason G, Ajib K, Herrera-Caceres J, Chandrasekar T, Perlis N. Validating the total cancer location density metric for stratifying patients with low-risk localized prostate cancer at higher risk of grade group reclassification while on active surveillance. Urol Oncol 2023; 41:146.e23-146.e28. [PMID: 36639336 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Revised: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To validate a previously proposed prognostic metric, Total Cancer Location (TCLo) density, in a contemporary cohort of men with grade group (GG) 1 prostate cancer (PCa) on active surveillance (AS). METHODS We evaluated 123 patients who entered AS with maximum GG1 PCa at diagnostic and/or confirmatory biopsy. TCLo was defined as the total number of PCa locations identified on both biopsy sessions. TCLo density was calculated as TCLo / prostate volume [ml]. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), defined as time from confirmatory biopsy to grade group reclassification (GGR) on repeat biopsy or prostatectomy. Optimal cut-point for TCLo density was predefined in a previously reported cohort and applied to this contemporary cohort. Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression analysis were used to estimate the association of predictors with PFS. RESULTS During median follow-up of 7.8 years, (IQR 7.3-8.2) 34 men had GGR. Using previously defined cut-points, PFS at 5-years was 60% (95% CI: 44%-81%) vs. 89% (95% CI: 83%-96%) in men with high (≥0.06 ml-1) vs. low (<0.06 ml-1) TCLo density, and 63% (95% CI: 48%-82%) vs. 90% (95% CI: 83%-96%) in men with high (≥3) vs. low (≤2) TCLo (log-rank test: P < 0.0001, respectively). Adjusting for age, prostate volume, percent of positive cores and PSA, both higher TCLo density (HR [per 0.01 ml-1 increase]: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.05-1.33, P = 0.005) and TCLo (HR: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.20-2.38, P = 0.002) were associated with shorter PFS. CONCLUSION The previously suggested prognostic value of TCLo density was confirmed in this validation cohort. TCLo alone performed similarly well. Patients with high TCLo density (≥0.06 ml-1) or TCLo (>2) were at greater risk of GGR while on AS. With external validation, these metric may help guide risk-adapted surveillance protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guan Hee Tan
- University Health Network, Sprott Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Sunway Medical Centre, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Dominik Deniffel
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Germany; Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Sinai Health System and University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Antonio Finelli
- University Health Network, Sprott Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Marian Wettstein
- University Health Network, Sprott Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ardalan Ahmad
- University Health Network, Sprott Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Alexandre Zlotta
- University Health Network, Sprott Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Division of Urology, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada
| | - Neil Fleshner
- University Health Network, Sprott Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Robert Hamilton
- University Health Network, Sprott Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Girish Kulkarni
- University Health Network, Sprott Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Gregory Nason
- University Health Network, Sprott Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Khaled Ajib
- University Health Network, Sprott Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jaime Herrera-Caceres
- University Health Network, Sprott Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Nathan Perlis
- University Health Network, Sprott Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fosså SD, Dahl AA, Børge Johannesen T, Gjelsvik YM, Holck Storås A, Myklebust TÅ. Late Adverse Health Outcomes and Quality of Life after Curative Radiotherapy+ long-term ADT in Prostate Cancer Survivors:Comparison with men from the General Population. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2022; 37:78-84. [PMID: 36093341 PMCID: PMC9450064 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
More than 5 years after radiotherapy for prostate cancer ) 54 % elderly patients report at least one moderate or big problem within the urinary, bowel or sexual domain. (Controls : 30%) Such problems reduce Quality of Life., which, however ,is similar in the two cohorts , the least difference observed within the sexual domain.
Background Few studies have described the impact of urinary, bowel and sexual Adverse Health Outcomes (AHOs) on Quality of Life (QoL) in Prostate Cancer Survivors living for more than 5 years after curative radiotherapy (“long-term PCaSs”), and compared the findings with those in men from general population. Here we assess self-reported AHOs in such PCaSs focusing on the association between problem experience and QoL. The findings are compared to corresponding symptoms in age-similar men from the general population without a PCa diagnosis (Norms). Methods Nine years (mean) after curative radiotherapy 1231 PCaSs and 3156 Norms completed the EPIC-26 questionnaire and the EORTC QLQ-C30 instrument. Domain Summary Scores (DSSs) for the urinary, bowel and sexual domains, the percentages of moderate/big dysfunctions and the proportions of overall problems were determined. Inter-cohort differences were interpreted based on cut-off values for published Minimal Clinically Important Differences (MCIDs). Multivariable linear regression models analyzed the associations between QoL and domain-related overall problems. Results Only the inter-cohort differences regarding bowel and sexual DSSs exceeded the respective MCIDs. Among PCaSs 54% had at least one moderate/big problem (Norms: 30%). In PCaSs and Norms, QoL increased with decreasing urinary and bowel problems, For sexuality this association was weaker in Norms and was almost lacking in PCaSs. Multivariable-adjusted QoL was similar in PCaSs and Norms, with general health being the strongest covariate. Conclusions During follow-up of long-term PCaSs health professionals should be aware of the survivors’ persisting moderate/big urinary, bowel or sexual problems associated with reduced QoL. In particular , alleviation of urinary and bowel problems can increase the men’s QoL.
Collapse
|
3
|
Monsen KV, Fosså SD, Myklebust TÅ, Smeland S, Dahl AA, Stensvold A. Long-term satisfaction with curative treatment and follow-up in prostate cancer survivors. Acta Oncol 2022; 61:357-362. [PMID: 35103559 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2021.2006775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In a cross-sectional observational study to explore long-term satisfaction with treatment among men who had undergone radical prostatectomy (RP) or definitive pelvic radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS After mean 7 years from therapy (range: 6-8), 431 PCa-survivors (RP: n = 313, RT: n = 118) completed a mailed questionnaire assessing persistent treatment-related adverse effects (AEs) (Expanded Prostate cancer Index Composite [EPIC-26]) and seven Quality indicators describing satisfaction with the health care service following a most often general practitioner (GP)-led follow-up plan. A logistic regression model evaluated the associations between long-term satisfaction and treatment modality, age, the seven satisfaction-related Quality indicators, and persistent AEs. The significance level was set at p< .05. RESULTS Four of five (81%) PCa-survivors reported long-term satisfaction with their treatment. In a multivariable model, satisfaction was positively associated with sufficient information about treatment and AEs, patient-perceived sufficient cooperation between the hospital and the GP and sufficient follow-up of AEs (ref.: insufficient). Age ≥70 years (ref.: <70) and a rising summary score within the EPIC-26 sexual domain additionally increased long-term satisfaction. The treatment modality itself (RP versus RT) did not significantly impact on satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS The majority of curatively treated PCa-survivors are satisfied with their treatment more than 5 years after primary therapy. Sufficient information, improved cooperation between the hospital specialists and the responsible GP and optimized follow-up of AEs may further increase long-term satisfaction among prostatectomized and irradiated PCa-survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kari V. Monsen
- Section for Clinical Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - Sophie D. Fosså
- Section for Clinical Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - Tor Å. Myklebust
- Department of Research and Innovation, Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust, Ålesund, Norway
- Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sigbjørn Smeland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway
- Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Alv A. Dahl
- Section for Clinical Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - Andreas Stensvold
- Division of Clinical Oncology, Østfold Hospital Trust, Kalnes, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lardas M, Grivas N, Debray TPA, Zattoni F, Berridge C, Cumberbatch M, Van den Broeck T, Briers E, De Santis M, Farolfi A, Fossati N, Gandaglia G, Gillessen S, O'Hanlon S, Henry A, Liew M, Mason M, Moris L, Oprea-Lager D, Ploussard G, Rouviere O, Schoots IG, van der Kwast T, van der Poel H, Wiegel T, Willemse PP, Yuan CY, Grummet JP, Tilki D, van den Bergh RCN, Lam TB, Cornford P, Mottet N. Patient- and Tumour-related Prognostic Factors for Urinary Incontinence After Radical Prostatectomy for Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol Focus 2021; 8:674-689. [PMID: 33967010 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.04.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2021] [Accepted: 04/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT While urinary incontinence (UI) commonly occurs after radical prostatectomy (RP), it is unclear what factors increase the risk of UI development. OBJECTIVE To perform a systematic review of patient- and tumour-related prognostic factors for post-RP UI. The primary outcome was UI within 3 mo after RP. Secondary outcomes included UI at 3-12 mo and ≥12 mo after RP. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Databases including Medline, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were searched between January 1990 and May 2020. All studies reporting patient- and tumour-related prognostic factors in univariable or multivariable analyses were included. Surgical factors were excluded. Risk of bias (RoB) and confounding assessments were performed using the Quality In Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed for all prognostic factor, where possible. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS A total of 119 studies (5 randomised controlled trials, 24 prospective, 88 retrospective, and 2 case-control studies) with 131 379 patients were included. RoB was high for study participation and confounding; moderate to high for statistical analysis, study attrition, and prognostic factor measurement; and low for outcome measurements. Significant prognostic factors for postoperative UI within 3 mo after RP were age (odds ratio [OR] per yearly increase 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.05), membranous urethral length (MUL; OR per 1-mm increase 0.81, 95% CI 0.74-0.88), prostate volume (PV; OR per 1-ml increase 1.005, 95% CI 1.000-1.011), and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI; OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.09-1.50). CONCLUSIONS Increasing age, shorter MUL, greater PV, and higher CCI are independent prognostic factors for UI within 3 mo after RP, with all except CCI remaining prognostic at 3-12 mo. PATIENT SUMMARY We reviewed the literature to identify patient and disease factors associated with urinary incontinence after surgery for prostate cancer. We found increasing age, larger prostate volume, shorter length of a section of the urethra (membranous urethra), and lower fitness were associated with worse urinary incontinence for the first 3 mo after surgery, with all except lower fitness remaining predictive at 3-12 mo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Lardas
- Department of Urology, Metropolitan General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
| | - Nikos Grivas
- Department of Urology, University General Hospital of Heraklion, University of Crete Medical School, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Thomas P A Debray
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Fabio Zattoni
- Urology Unit, Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, Udine, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | - Maria De Santis
- Department of Urology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andrea Farolfi
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Nicola Fossati
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Silke Gillessen
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Shane O'Hanlon
- Medicine for Older People, Saint Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ann Henry
- Leeds Cancer Centre, St. James's University Hospital and University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Matthew Liew
- Department of Urology, Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Wigan, UK
| | - Malcolm Mason
- Division of Cancer & Genetics, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK
| | - Lisa Moris
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Daniela Oprea-Lager
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Olivier Rouviere
- Department of Urinary and Vascular Imaging, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Ivo G Schoots
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Henk van der Poel
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Peter-Paul Willemse
- Department of Oncological Urology, University Medical Center, Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cathy Y Yuan
- Department of Medicine, Health Science Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Jeremy P Grummet
- Department of Surgery, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, and Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Thomas B Lam
- Department of Urology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Philip Cornford
- Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Nicolas Mottet
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, St. Etienne, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Togashi K, Hatakeyama S, Kojima Y, Momota M, Narita T, Iwamura H, Hamano I, Hamaya T, Fujita N, Okamoto T, Yoneyama T, Yamamoto H, Yoneyama T, Hashimoto Y, Ohyama C. The effect of frailty on the quality of life and lower urinary symptoms following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A longitudinal analysis (FRARP-QL Study). Urol Oncol 2020; 39:192.e7-192.e14. [PMID: 32861619 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2020] [Revised: 07/08/2020] [Accepted: 08/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We aimed to evaluate the effect of frailty on health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) and lower urinary symptoms (LUTS) following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in patients with prostate cancer (CaP). MATERIALS AND METHODS We longitudinally evaluated geriatric 8 (G8), HRQOL, and LUTS for 12 months in 118 patients with RARP from January 2017 to April 2020. Patients were divided into frail (G8 ≤14) and nonfrail (G8 >14) groups. We compared the effect of frailty on HRQOL and LUTS between the frail and nonfrail groups before and 12 months after RARP. RESULTS The median age of patients was 68 years. The number of patients in the frail and nonfrail groups were 41 and 77, respectively. No significant difference in patients' background was observed between the groups, except for the presence of cardiovascular disease (22% vs. 7.8%, P = 0.041). There was no significant difference in HRQOLs and LUTS between the groups at baseline. Similarly, HRQOLs, LUTS, and pad-free continence rates were not significantly different between the groups at 12 months after RARP. In the nonfrail group, LUTS at 12 months following RARP significantly improved compared to those at the baseline, but it did not significantly improve in the frail group. Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that frailty was not significantly associated with LUTS worsening. CONCLUSIONS Frailty was not significantly associated with the worsening of HRQOL, LUTS, and pad-free continence rates in patients treated with RARP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyo Togashi
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Shingo Hatakeyama
- Department of Advanced Blood Purification Therapy, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
| | - Yuta Kojima
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Masaki Momota
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Takuma Narita
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Hiromichi Iwamura
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Itsuto Hamano
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Tomoko Hamaya
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Naoki Fujita
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Teppei Okamoto
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Tohru Yoneyama
- Department of Advanced Transplant and Regenerative Medicine, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Hayato Yamamoto
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Takahiro Yoneyama
- Department of Advanced Transplant and Regenerative Medicine, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Hashimoto
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Chikara Ohyama
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan; Department of Advanced Blood Purification Therapy, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan; Department of Advanced Transplant and Regenerative Medicine, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|