The role of ureteroscopy for treatment of staghorn calculi: A systematic review

Retrograde intrarenal surgery with intelligent control of renal pelvic pressure for staghorn calculi: a case report

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is the gold standard treatment for staghorn calculi. However, this study reviews a case of an almost complete removal of staghorn calculi following one session of retrograde intrarenal surgery with intelligent control of renal pelvic pressure (RIRS-ICP). A 45 years-old female patient with an 8.3 × 4.5 cm complete staghorn stone was infected with Proteus mirabilis. Two sensitive antibiotics, piperacillin tazobactam and etimicin, were administered for 3 days. Semirigid 7/8.4 Fr ureteroscope was used to treat the renal pelvis and upper calyceal calculi for 57 min. A 550 μm holmium laser fiber with 2.0 J × 30 Hz was set. Next, a disposable flexible ureteroscope of 8.4 Fr was used to address residual middle and lower calyx stones for 94 min. A 200 μm holmium laser fiber with 1.0 J × 30 Hz was set. The renal pelvis pressure was controlled within 15 mmHg. A 2 mm CT scan on the first postoperative day showed inferior caliceal residue of approximately 1.0 × 0.6 cm. No complications occurred. This suggests that RIRS-ICP is a safe and effective treatment for staghorn calculi.

Advancements in stone classification: unveiling the beauty of urolithiasis

PURPOSE

Urolithiasis has become increasingly prevalent, leading to higher disability-adjusted life years and deaths. Various stone classification systems have been developed to enhance the understanding of lithogenesis, aid urologists in treatment decisions, and predict recurrence risk. The aim of this manuscript is to provide an overview of different stone classification criteria.

METHODS

Two authors conducted a review of literature on studies relating to the classification of urolithiasis. A narrative synthesis for analysis of the studies was used.

RESULTS

Stones can be categorized based on anatomical position, size, medical imaging features, risk of recurrence, etiology, composition, and morphoconstitutional analysis. The first three mentioned offer a straightforward approach to stone classification, directly influencing treatment recommendations. With the routine use of CT imaging before treatment, precise details like anatomical location, stone dimensions, and Hounsfield Units can be easily determined, aiding treatment planning. In contrast, classifying stones based on risk of recurrence and etiology is more complex due to dependencies on multiple variables, including stone composition and morphology. A classification system based on morphoconstitutional analysis, which combines morphological stone appearance and chemical composition, has demonstrated its value. It allows for the rapid identification of crystalline phase principles, the detection of crystalline conversion processes, the determination of etiopathogenesis, the recognition of lithogenic processes, the assessment of crystal formation speed, related recurrence rates, and guidance for selecting appropriate treatment modalities.

CONCLUSIONS

Recognizing that no single classification system can comprehensively cover all aspects, the integration of all classification approaches is essential for tailoring urolithiasis patient-specific management.

The Saudi urological association guidelines on urolithiasis

Aims

The Saudi Urolithiasis Guidelines are a set of recommendations for diagnosing, evaluating, and treating urolithiasis in the Saudi population. These guidelines are based on the latest evidence and expert consensus to improve patient outcomes and optimize care delivery. They cover the various aspects of urolithiasis, including risk factors, diagnosis, medical and surgical treatments, and prevention strategies. By following these guidelines, health-care professionals can improve care quality for individuals with urolithiasis in Saudi Arabia.

Panel

The Saudi Urolithiasis Guidelines Panel consists of urologists specialized in endourology with expertise in urolithiasis and consultation with a guideline methodologist. All panelists involved in this document have submitted statements disclosing any potential conflicts of interest.

Methods

The Saudi Guidelines on Urolithiasis were developed by relying primarily on established international guidelines to adopt or adapt the most appropriate guidance for the Saudi context. When necessary, the panel modified the phrasing of recommendations from different sources to ensure consistency within the document. To address areas less well covered in existing guidelines, the panel conducted a directed literature search for high quality evidence published in English, including meta analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospective nonrandomized comparative studies. The panel also searched for locally relevant studies containing information unique to the Saudi Arabian population. The recommendations are formulated with a direction and strength of recommendation based on GRADE terminology and interpretation while relying on existing summaries of evidence from the existing guidelines.

2022 Recommendations of the AFU Lithiasis Committee: Combined approach for the management of kidney and ureteral stones (Endoscopic Combined IntraRenal Surgery, ECIRS)

The primary objective of the combined approach is to limit the number of percutaneous access tracts for the treatment of staghorn, or complex kidney stones by simultaneous percutaneous antegrade and retrograde ureteroscopy. The other indication is the simultaneous presence of several kidney and ureteral stones or of an impacted pelvic stone. The combination of the two techniques may increase the stone-free rate and decrease the retreatment rate of complex stones compared with percutaneous nephrolithotomy alone. The patient is usually in the modified supine position. METHODOLOGY: These recommendations were developed using two methods: the Clinical Practice Recommendation (CPR) method and the ADAPTE method, depending on whether the question was considered in the European Association of Urology (EAU) recommendations (https://uroweb.org/guidelines/urolithiasis) [EAU Guidelines on urolithiasis. 2022] and their adaptability to the French context.

The efficacy and safety of one-stage endoscopy combined with intrarenal surgery (mini-nephrostomy tract) in the prone split-leg position for complex renal calculi

Background

The goal of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) performed in the prone split-leg position for the treatment of complex renal stones.

Materials and methods

A mature ECIRS protocol was designed. Retrospective analysis was conducted of medical records between January 2020 and December 2021 of patients with complex renal stones at one center who underwent ECIRS by 2 skilled surgeons using retrograde flexible ureteroscopy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the prone split-leg position.

Results

A total of 44 patients were included in this study. Mean stone size was 26.1 ± 12.7 mm, and the number of calyces involved was 4.36 ± 2.09. Mean operative time was 71.1 ± 21.8 minutes. Postoperative decline in hemoglobin was 15.8 ± 9.8 g/L. Seventy-five percent of patients achieved stone-free status. The mean number of residual stones was 2.8 ± 2.3, and the mean residual stone size was 10.30 ± 4.76 mm. Six patients (13.6%) developed postoperative complications, including 4 with fever during the first 2 days postoperatively and 2 patients with transient postoperative pain. No patients developed severe complications.

Conclusions

Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in the prone split-leg position can be performed safely by experienced surgeons using retrograde flexible ureteroscopy in conjunction with mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy as a successful technique for the treatment of complex renal stones.

Impact of Vacuum-Assisted Mini-Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery for Staghorn Stones: Analysis of Perioperative Factors of Postoperative Fever and Stone-Free Status

Background and Objective: This retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of vacuum-assisted mini-endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (vmECIRS) for staghorn stones. Patients and Methods: We analyzed a total of 61 cases treated with initial vmECIRS using 14F/16F ClearPetra^® percutaneous sheaths for staghorn stones. We primarily measured complications and stone-free rates (SFRs) to evaluate the safety and efficiency of vmECIRS. In addition, pre- and intraoperative factors in patients who experienced postoperative fever >38°C and achieved an initial stone-free status were evaluated. Results: The percentages of staghorn stones were 36.1% and 63.9% for complete and partial stones, respectively. The median stone volume was 8.48 cm³. The median operation time was 117 minutes, and the mean number of procedures was 1.54. Regarding postoperative complications, postoperative fever >38°C was reported in 18 patients (29.5%). The initial and final SFRs were 50.8% and 91.8%, respectively. Among patients with emerging fever >38°C, positive urine culture was the only significant risk factor in the multivariate analysis (odds ratio [OR], 7.500; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.772-31.751; p = 0.006). Moreover, for achieving initial stone-free status, body mass index and stone volume were significant risk factors in the multivariate analysis (OR, 0.872; 95% CI, 0.776-0.980; p = 0.021; and OR, 0.882; 95% CI, 0.784-0.994; p = 0.039, respectively). Conclusions: These findings suggest that vmECIRS is safe and effective for treatment of staghorn stones. Although current guidelines suggest that percutaneous nephrolithotomy is the gold standard surgical technique for staghorn stones, vmECIRS could also be a treatment strategy. The Clinical Trial Registration number (ID: 2022-05-17-1).

Comparison of Safety and Efficacy in Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery Performed in the Lateral Decubitus and Galdakao-modified Supine Valdivia Positions

OBJECTIVE

To examine the safety and efficacy of Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) between the lateral decubitus (LD) and Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia (GMSV) position.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 226 patients with renal stones who underwent ECIRS in the LD and GMSV positions between 2018 and 2022. Surgeries early in the study period were mainly performed in the GMSV position, while later surgeries were mainly performed in the LD position.

RESULTS

The number of patients in the LD and GMSV groups was 119 and 107, respectively. The proportion of patients who had no residual stone fragments >2 mm detected on radiography the day after surgery did not significantly differ between the LD group (91.6%) and the GMSV group (97.2%). Operation time was significantly shorter in the LD group (72 vs 81 minutes; P = .02). Total fluoroscopy time was significantly shorter in the LD group (92 vs 189 seconds; P<.001). Complication rates did not significantly differ between the groups. Among the variables analyzed, the patient position was independently impact on the fluoroscopy time (OR 0.309; 95% CI, 0.167-0.571; P<.001).

CONCLUSION

ECIRS in the LD position is safe and effective and associated with shorter fluoroscopy than the GSMV position.

Is There Still a Place for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Current Times?

Background: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and its miniaturized modifications are usually considered the standard surgical options for large (>20 mm) staghorn and infected stones. Moreover, PCNL is a viable alternative to retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for smaller stones (<20 mm) in the presence of anatomical malformations or inaccessible lower pole stones. However, due to the advancements in laser and scope technology, RIRS is expanding its indications with the potential benefits of lower complications and a shorter hospital stay. Methods: A literature search using the PUBMED database from inception to June 2022 was performed to explore the current role of PCNL in endourology. The analysis involved a narrative synthesis. Results: PCNL confirmed its role in the treatment of large and complex stones; moreover, miniaturized PCNL has become more competitive, gaining space among classic indications of flexible ureteroscopy. Conclusions: considering all the evaluated subgroups, we can conclude that PCNL is an old fascinating procedure and is here to stay.

Nonpapillary prone endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery: effectiveness, safety and tips, and tricks

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of nonpapillary prone endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) and provide practical tips and tricks for the successful accomplishment of the procedure respecting the anatomical particularities.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study is an analysis of a prospectively collected database including all cases of ECIRS performed between January 2019 and December 2021 in a high-volume tertiary center. All patients underwent the procedure in prone-split leg position. A nonpapillary renal puncture was performed. The used access sheaths were 22Fr or 30Fr. Lithotripsy was performed anterogradely with a dual-energy lithotripter with incorporated suction and retrogradely with holmium Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet laser.

RESULTS

A total of 33 patients were included. The initial stone-free rate (SFR) was 84.8% and the final SFR was 90.9%. The median stone size was 35 mm and 60% of patients had staghorn calculi. The prevalence of renal abnormalities was 21.3%, including 3 cases of horseshoe kidney, 2 cases of malrotation and 2 cases with complete duplicated systems. The median operative time was 47 min. The median hospital stay was 3 days and median hemoglobin loss was 1.2 gr/dL. Overall, the complication rate was 9.1%, all being Grade II complications (n = 2 fever and n = 1 transient bleeding).

CONCLUSIONS

Nonpapillary prone ECIRS is an effective and safe procedure. Standardization of the procedure is critical to achieve good outcomes. Patients who benefit the most are probably the ones where additional punctures can be avoided using this technique, namely patients with renal abnormalities, incrusted ureteral stents and staghorn stones.

Does previous standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy impair retrograde intrarenal surgery outcomes?

Purpose:

The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of a previous standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) on the outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS).

Materials and Methods:

Outcomes of RIRS performed from January 2017 to January 2020 in adult patients with residual stone fragments ≤20mm after a standard PCNL (Post-PCNL) and symptomatic adult patients with kidney stones ≤20mm (Control) were prospectively studied. Stone-free rate (SFR) was evaluated on a postoperative day 90 non-contrast computed tomography. Surgical complications based on Clavien-Dindo classification during the 90 days of follow-up were recorded.

Results:

Outcomes of 55 patients and 57 renal units of the post-PCNL group were compared to 92 patients and 115 renal units of the control group. SFR was lower in post-PCNL group than in control (28/57, 49.1% vs. 86/115, 74.8%, p <0.001). Overall complications were more frequent in post-PCNL group (p=0.004). Infundibula strictures were identified and incised with laser in 15/57 (26.3%) renal units of the post-PCNL group. Thirteen renal units had infundibulum stricture at the site of previous percutaneous tract (13/15; 86.7%, p=0.004) and one renal unit had three infundibula strictures. Postoperative complications were not affected by the treatment of infundibula strictures (p=0.198).

Conclusions:

Previous standard PCNL significantly impairs the outcomes of RIRS. Infundibula strictures can be found in 26.3% of the patients with residual stone fragments after standard PCNL for large burden kidney stones. The main site of infundibulum stricture after standard PCNL is the infundibulum of the entry calyx.

Residual Stone Fragments After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Shockwave Lithotripsy vs Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery

Background: Despite technology incorporation to percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), residual stone fragments (RSFs) may still persist after PCNL and need to be addressed to avoid regrowth or ureteral obstruction. The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) for treating patients with RSFs after a previous standard PCNL. Materials and Methods: Adult patients with RSF after a standard PCNL submitted to RIRS or SWL in our Institution from January 2017 to January 2020 were retrospectively studied. Stone-free rate (SFR) was evaluated on postoperative day (POD) 90 by noncontrast CT (NCCT) or ultrasound and kidney, ureter, and bladder radiograph (KUB) for each renal unit. Surgical complications based on Clavien-Dindo classification during the 90 days of follow-up were recorded. Sample size was calculated for a power of 80% and a significance level of 0.05, assuming SFR of 20% for SWL and 50% for RIRS. Results: Thirty-three patients treated by SWL were compared with 36 patients treated by RIRS. Hospitalization time was longer in the RIRS group (4.18 vs 12.33 hours, p = 0.001). SFR and success rate were lower in SWL than RIRS group (24.2% vs 58.3%, p = 0.007 and 30.3% vs 72.2%, p = 0.004, respectively), using POD 90 NCCT in 81.8% and ultrasound and KUB in 18.2% of the SWL group and using POD 90 NCCT in 100% of the RIRS group. Minor complications (Clavien-Dindo < III) occurred in 11 of 36 (30.6%) patients submitted to RIRS and in 2 of 33 (6.1%) patients submitted to SWL group (p = 0.025). Two patients (6.1%) of the SWL group had Clavien-Dindo IIIb complication owing to Steinstrasse and were submitted to ureteroscopy. Emergency room visits were similar between groups (6.1% vs 8.3%, p = 1.0). Conclusions: RIRS has better SFR, higher minor complications, and lower major complications than SWL for the treatment of RSFs after standard PCNL.

A Multi-institutional Review of Single-access Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Complex Staghorn Stones

BACKGROUND

With the heterogeneous distribution of novel surgical technologies and variable physician training, there is a need to re-evaluate contemporary outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for complex staghorn stones.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate contemporary outcomes of guideline-supported treatment for patients with staghorn kidney stones using single-access PCNL in multiple North American centers.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

We performed a multi-institutional retrospective review of staghorn stones managed from January 1, 2017 to January 1, 2019, inclusive. We excluded patients with more than a single percutaneous access per renal unit and those who underwent a concomitant contralateral procedure.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Safety (Clavien-Dindo complications) and efficacy in terms of a strictly defined stone-free rate were examined for single-access PCNL performed on staghorn stones with a Guy's stone score of 3-4.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

We evaluated 301 patients meeting the inclusion criteria with an average age of 57 yr (range 18-87). All stones had a Guy's stone score of 3 (36.2%) or 4 (63.8%). The mean (± standard deviation) stone burden was 191.4 ± 49.8 mm². Of the 297 patients (98.6%) who underwent computed tomography on postoperative day 1, 132 (44.4%) showed no residual stone, 111 (37.3%) had a largest fragment <4 mm, and 54 (18.2%) had a fragment ≥4 mm after primary single-access PCNL. Secondary procedures were performed in 117 patients (38.9%). Imaging at 3 mo demonstrated that 210/257 patients (82%) were stone-free. The overall complication rate was 17.9%, with 11 patients (3.7%) experiencing Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3 complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-access PCNL for complex staghorn stones is safe and effective. High stone-free rates with minimal morbidity are achievable with current techniques.

PATIENT SUMMARY

This study confirms that single-access percutaneous nephrolithotomy provides excellent outcomes in the treatment of complex kidney stones. This surgical technique has both safe and effective outcomes that are reproducible across multiple centers in North America.

Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) - Tips and tricks to improve outcomes: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed at assessing current efficacy and safety of endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) for the treatment of large and/or complex urolithiasis and identifying relevant tips and tricks able to improve its outcomes, mainly deriving from the adjunct of retrograde flexible ureteroscopy to the traditional antegrade approach of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic review was conducted using relevant databases (Ovid Medline, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Sciences), employing "ECIRS" as the search term in all cases, and then adding "endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery" and "flexible ureteroscopy AND percutaneous nephrolithotomy" as search terms for PubMed and Scopus. Original articles and systematic reviews were selected according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Additionally, the reference lists of the selected publications were checked manually.

RESULTS

A total of 14 studies were selected for analysis: two systematic reviews, one randomized controlled trial, five nonrandomized comparative studies, three prospective case series, and three retrospective case series. ECIRS achieves high stone-free rates and rather low/low Clavien-Dindo grade complication rates, confirming the role of retrograde ureteroscopy in the maximization of its efficacy and safety. A narrative synthesis of the most recognized tips and tricks of ECIRS is provided.

CONCLUSION

The contribution of retrograde flexible ureteroscopy during PNL is essential. It plays a dual role, both diagnostic and active, allowing tailoring of the procedure to the patient, urolithiasis, and anatomy of the collecting system and optimization of the PNL efficacy and safety. This is ECIRS: an updated, complete, and versatile version of PNL.

Prone versus supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current literature

INTRODUCTION

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) can be performed either in prone or supine position. This study aimed at gathering together randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing efficacy and safety between prone and supine PNL.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Systematic review of literature was conducted using the Scopus, Medline and Web of Science databases. Study selection, data extraction and quality assessment were independently assessed by two authors. Meta-analysis was performed with Review Manager 5.3. Sensitivity analyses were performed to exclude studies with high risk of bias.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Pooled data from 12 studies including 1290 patients were available for analysis. Only one study was found to have overall low risk of bias. Significantly shorter operative time was found in favor of supine PNL (mean difference 13 minutes, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.4-22.7; P<0.01). Stone-free rate (SFR)≥14 days after surgery was significantly higher in prone PNL (odds ratio [OR]=2.15, 95% CI: 1.07-4.34; P=0.03). Significantly higher fever rate was found in prone PNL (OR=1.60, 95% CI: 1.03-2.47; P=0.04). Overall SFR, hospital stay length, complications rate, transfusions rate and blood loss, as well as non-lower calyx puncture rate, puncture attempts and tubeless intervention rate did not differ between prone and supine PNL (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Efficacy of PNL seems balanced between prone and supine position, with comparable overall SFR and shorter operative time in favor of supine PNL. Safety of PNL appears in favor of supine PNL, with lower fever rate. Because of study heterogeneity and possible risks of outcome bias, results from this study should be interpreted with caution. Altogether, both prone and supine PNL account for appropriate therapy options.