1
|
Güven S, Tokas T, Tozsin A, Haid B, Lendvay TS, Silay S, Mohan VC, Cansino JR, Saulat S, Straub M, Tur AB, Akgül B, Samotyjek J, Lusuardi L, Ferretti S, Cavdar OF, Ortner G, Sultan S, Choong S, Micali S, Saltirov I, Sezer A, Netsch C, de Lorenzis E, Cakir OO, Zeng G, Gozen AS, Bianchi G, Jurkiewicz B, Knoll T, Rassweiler J, Ahmed K, Sarica K. Consensus statement addressing controversies and guidelines on pediatric urolithiasis. World J Urol 2024; 42:473. [PMID: 39110242 PMCID: PMC11306500 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05161-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2024] [Accepted: 07/05/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to investigate controversial pediatric urolithiasis issues systematically, integrating expert consensus and comprehensive guidelines reviews. METHODS Two semi-structured online focus group meetings were conducted to discuss the study's need and content, review current literature, and prepare the initial survey. Data were collected through surveys and focus group discussions. Existing guidelines were reviewed, and a second survey was conducted using the Delphi method to validate findings and facilitate consensus. The primary outcome measures investigated controversial issues, integrating expert consensus and guideline reviews. RESULTS Experts from 15 countries participated, including 20 with 16+ years of experience, 2 with 11-15 years, and 4 with 6-10 years. The initial survey identified nine main themes, emphasizing the need for standardized diagnostic and treatment protocols and tailored treatments. Inter-rater reliability was high, with controversies in treatment approaches (score 4.6, 92% agreement), follow-up protocols (score 4.8, 100% agreement), and diagnostic criteria (score 4.6, 92% agreement). The second survey underscored the critical need for consensus on identification, diagnostic criteria (score 4.6, 92% agreement), and standardized follow-up protocols (score 4.8, 100% agreement). CONCLUSION The importance of personalized treatment in pediatric urolithiasis is clear. Prioritizing low-radiation diagnostic tools, effectively managing residual stone fragments, and standardized follow-up protocols are crucial for improving patient outcomes. Integrating new technologies while ensuring safety and reliability is also essential. Harmonizing guidelines across regions can provide consistent and effective management. Future efforts should focus on collaborative research, specialized training, and the integration of new technologies in treatment protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Güven
- Department of Urology, Necmettin Erbakan University Meram School of Medicine, Konya, Turkey.
| | - T Tokas
- Department of Urology, University General Hospital of Heraklion, Athens, Greece
| | - A Tozsin
- Department of Urology, Trakya University School of Medicine Hospital, Edirne, Turkey
| | - B Haid
- Ordensklinikum Linz, Barmherzige Scwestern Hospital, Linz, Austria
| | - T S Lendvay
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - S Silay
- Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - V C Mohan
- Preeti Urology Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | - J R Cansino
- Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - S Saulat
- Department of Urology, Tabba Kidney Institute, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - M Straub
- Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - A Bujons Tur
- Urology Department, Fundación Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - B Akgül
- Department of Urology, Trakya University School of Medicine Hospital, Edirne, Turkey
| | - J Samotyjek
- Pediatric Surgery and Urology Clinic CMKP in Dziekanów Leśny, Dziekanów Leśny, Poland
| | - L Lusuardi
- Department of Urology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg University Hospital, Urology, Salzburg, Austria
| | - S Ferretti
- Department of Urology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - O F Cavdar
- Department of Urology, Necmettin Erbakan University Meram School of Medicine, Konya, Turkey
| | - G Ortner
- Department of Urology, General Hospital Hall I.T, Tirol, Austria
| | - S Sultan
- Department of Urology, Menoufia University Hospitals, Shebeen El Kom, Egypt
| | - S Choong
- Institute of Urology, University College Hospital, London, UK
| | - S Micali
- Department of Urology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - I Saltirov
- Department of Urology and Nephrology at Military Medical Academy, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - A Sezer
- Pediatric Urology Clinic, Konya City Hospital, Konya, Turkey
| | - C Netsch
- Asklepios Klinik BarmbekAbteilung Für Urologie, Hamburg, Germany
| | - E de Lorenzis
- Department of Urology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - O O Cakir
- King's College London, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, King's Health Partners, London, UK
| | - G Zeng
- Department of Urology and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - A S Gozen
- Department of Urology, Medius Clinic, Ostfildern, Germany
| | - G Bianchi
- Department of Urology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - B Jurkiewicz
- Pediatric Surgery and Urology Clinic CMKP in Dziekanów Leśny, Dziekanów Leśny, Poland
| | - T Knoll
- Klinikum Sindelfingen-Boeblingen, Sindelfingen, Germany
| | - J Rassweiler
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Danube Private University, Krems, Austria
| | - K Ahmed
- King's College London, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, King's Health Partners, London, UK
- Sheikh Khalifa Medical City, Abu Dhabi, UAE
- Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, UAE
| | - K Sarica
- Sancaktepe Sehit Prof. Dr. Ilhan Varank Research and Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Edison E, Mazzon G, Arumuham V, Choong S. Prevention of complications in endourological management of stones: What are the basic measures needed before, during, and after interventions? Asian J Urol 2024; 11:180-190. [PMID: 38680580 PMCID: PMC11053336 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2023.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective This narrative review aims to describe measures to minimise the risk of complications during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), ureteroscopy, and retrograde intrarenal surgery. Methods A literature search was conducted from the PubMed/PMC database for papers published within the last 10 years (January 2012 to December 2022). Search terms included "ureteroscopy", "retrograde intrarenal surgery", "PCNL", "percutaneous nephrolithotomy", "complications", "sepsis", "infection", "bleed", "haemorrhage", and "hemorrhage". Key papers were identified and included meta-analyses, systematic reviews, guidelines, and primary research. The references of these papers were searched to identify any further relevant papers not included above. Results The evidence is assimilated with the opinions of the authors to provide recommendations. Best practice pathways for patient care in the pre-operative, intra-operative, and post-operative periods are described, including the identification and management of residual stones. Key complications (sepsis and stent issues) that are relevant for any endourological procedure are then be discussed. Operation-specific considerations are then explored. Key measures for PCNL include optimising access to minimise the chance of bleeding or visceral injury. The role of endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in this regard is discussed. Key measures for ureteroscopy and retrograde intrarenal surgery include planning and technique to minimise the risk of ureteric injury. The role of anaesthetic assessment is discussed. The importance of specific comorbidities on each step of the pathway is highlighted as examples. Conclusion This review demonstrates that the principles of meticulous planning, interdisciplinary teamworking, and good operative technique can minimise the risk of complications in endourology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Edison
- Department of Urology, University College Hospital London, London, UK
| | - Giorgio Mazzon
- Department of Urology, San Bassiano Hospital, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Vimoshan Arumuham
- Department of Urology, University College Hospital London, London, UK
| | - Simon Choong
- Department of Urology, University College Hospital London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tominaga K, Inoue T, Yamamichi F, Fujita M, Fujisawa M. Impact of Vacuum-Assisted Mini-Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery for Staghorn Stones: Analysis of Perioperative Factors of Postoperative Fever and Stone-Free Status. J Endourol 2023; 37:400-406. [PMID: 36641643 DOI: 10.1089/end.2022.0579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and Objective: This retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of vacuum-assisted mini-endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (vmECIRS) for staghorn stones. Patients and Methods: We analyzed a total of 61 cases treated with initial vmECIRS using 14F/16F ClearPetra® percutaneous sheaths for staghorn stones. We primarily measured complications and stone-free rates (SFRs) to evaluate the safety and efficiency of vmECIRS. In addition, pre- and intraoperative factors in patients who experienced postoperative fever >38°C and achieved an initial stone-free status were evaluated. Results: The percentages of staghorn stones were 36.1% and 63.9% for complete and partial stones, respectively. The median stone volume was 8.48 cm3. The median operation time was 117 minutes, and the mean number of procedures was 1.54. Regarding postoperative complications, postoperative fever >38°C was reported in 18 patients (29.5%). The initial and final SFRs were 50.8% and 91.8%, respectively. Among patients with emerging fever >38°C, positive urine culture was the only significant risk factor in the multivariate analysis (odds ratio [OR], 7.500; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.772-31.751; p = 0.006). Moreover, for achieving initial stone-free status, body mass index and stone volume were significant risk factors in the multivariate analysis (OR, 0.872; 95% CI, 0.776-0.980; p = 0.021; and OR, 0.882; 95% CI, 0.784-0.994; p = 0.039, respectively). Conclusions: These findings suggest that vmECIRS is safe and effective for treatment of staghorn stones. Although current guidelines suggest that percutaneous nephrolithotomy is the gold standard surgical technique for staghorn stones, vmECIRS could also be a treatment strategy. The Clinical Trial Registration number (ID: 2022-05-17-1).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koki Tominaga
- Department of Urology and Stone Center, Hara Genitourinary Hospital, Kobe City, Japan
| | - Takaaki Inoue
- Department of Urology and Stone Center, Hara Genitourinary Hospital, Kobe City, Japan.,Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe City, Japan
| | - Fukashi Yamamichi
- Department of Urology and Stone Center, Hara Genitourinary Hospital, Kobe City, Japan
| | - Masaichiro Fujita
- Department of Urology and Stone Center, Hara Genitourinary Hospital, Kobe City, Japan
| | - Masato Fujisawa
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe City, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lim EJ, Castellani D, So WZ, Fong KY, Li JQ, Tiong HY, Gadzhiev N, Heng CT, Teoh JYC, Naik N, Ghani K, Sarica K, De La Rosette J, Somani B, Gauhar V. Radiomics in Urolithiasis: Systematic Review of Current Applications, Limitations, and Future Directions. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11175151. [PMID: 36079078 PMCID: PMC9457189 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11175151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2022] [Revised: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiomics is increasingly applied to the diagnosis, management, and outcome prediction of various urological conditions. Urolithiasis is a common benign condition with a high incidence and recurrence rate. The purpose of this scoping review is to evaluate the current evidence of the application of radiomics in urolithiasis, especially its utility in diagnostics and therapeutics. An electronic literature search on radiomics in the setting of urolithiasis was conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus from inception to 21 March 2022. A total of 7 studies were included. Radiomics has been successfully applied in the field of urolithiasis to differentiate phleboliths from calculi and classify stone types and composition pre-operatively. More importantly, it has also been utilized to predict outcomes and complications after endourological procedures. Although radiomics in urolithiasis is still in its infancy, it has the potential for large-scale implementation. Its greatest potential lies in the correlation with conventional established diagnostic and therapeutic factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ee Jean Lim
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore 169608, Singapore
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +65-6321-4693
| | - Daniele Castellani
- Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| | - Wei Zheng So
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119077, Singapore
| | - Khi Yung Fong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119077, Singapore
| | - Jing Qiu Li
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore 169608, Singapore
| | - Ho Yee Tiong
- Department of Urology, National University Hospital, Singapore 119074, Singapore
| | - Nariman Gadzhiev
- Department of Urology, Saint-Petersburg State University Hospital, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Chin Tiong Heng
- Department of Urology, Ng Teng Fong Hospital, Singapore 609606, Singapore
| | - Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Nithesh Naik
- Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India
| | - Khurshid Ghani
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Kemal Sarica
- Department of Urology, Biruni University, 34010 Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Jean De La Rosette
- Istanbul Medipol University, TEM Avrupa Otoyolu Goztepe Cikisi No: 1, 34010 Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Bhaskar Somani
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Vineet Gauhar
- Department of Urology, Ng Teng Fong Hospital, Singapore 609606, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jannello LMI, Turetti M, Silvani C, Galbiati G, Garbagnati S, Pozzi E, Malfatto M, Zanetti SP, Longo F, De Lorenzis E, Albo G, Salonia A, Montanari E, Boeri L. Urologists are optimistic surgeons: prevalence and predictors of discordance between intraoperative stone-free rate and cross-sectional imaging evaluation after vacuum-assisted mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol 2022; 40:2331-2338. [PMID: 35831471 PMCID: PMC9427905 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04091-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To assess how accurate are urologists in predicting stone-free status (SFS) after vacuum-assisted mini-PCNL (vamPCNL) compared to computed tomography (CT) and clinical predictors of discordant SFS. Methods Data from 235 patients who underwent vamPCNL were analysed. Patient’s demographics, stones’ characteristics and operative data were recorded. SFS was evaluated intraoperatively by the treating urologist (iSFS) and with non-contrast CT 3 months after vamPCNL (ctSFS). SFS was defined as no residual stones. Stone complexity was scored with the Guy’s score. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models were used to identify clinical factors associated with discordant SFS (namely iSFS not confirmed at CT). Results iSFS and ctSFS were 88.5% and 65.5%, respectively, with 54 (23%) cases resulting in discordant evaluation of SFS between the surgeon and CT imaging. Patients with discordant SFS had larger stone volume (p < 0.001), higher rate of multiple stones (p = 0.03) and higher rate of multiple calyceal groups affected by stones (p < 0.001) than those with concordant SFS. The use of flexible ureteroscopes to look for residual stones after lithotripsy was more frequently reported in cases with concordant SFS (p = 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that stones in > 2 calyceal groups (OR 10.2, p < 0.001), Guy’s score II (OR 5.8, p < 0.01) and not using flexible ureteroscopes after lithotripsy (OR 2.9, p = 0.02) were independent predictors of discordant SFS. Conclusion One out of five patients is erroneously considered SF after vamPCNL. Urologist should carefully evaluate patients with multiple calyceal stones and consider using flexible ureteroscopes to complete lapaxy of migrated fragments in order to improve their prediction of SFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Letizia Maria Ippolita Jannello
- Department of Urology, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via della Commenda 15, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Turetti
- Department of Urology, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via della Commenda 15, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Silvani
- Department of Urology, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via della Commenda 15, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Gilda Galbiati
- Department of Urology, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via della Commenda 15, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Susanna Garbagnati
- Department of Urology, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via della Commenda 15, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Efrem Pozzi
- Department of Urology, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via della Commenda 15, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Malfatto
- Department of Urology, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via della Commenda 15, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Paolo Zanetti
- Department of Urology, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via della Commenda 15, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Longo
- Department of Urology, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via della Commenda 15, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Elisa De Lorenzis
- Department of Urology, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via della Commenda 15, 20122, Milan, Italy.,Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Albo
- Department of Urology, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via della Commenda 15, 20122, Milan, Italy.,Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Salonia
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URIIRCCS Ospedale San RaffaeleUniversity Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Emanuele Montanari
- Department of Urology, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via della Commenda 15, 20122, Milan, Italy.,Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Boeri
- Department of Urology, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via della Commenda 15, 20122, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fayad MK, Fahmy O, Abulazayem KM, Salama NM. Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of renal pelvic stone more than 2 centimeters: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Urolithiasis 2021; 50:113-117. [PMID: 34807274 DOI: 10.1007/s00240-021-01289-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2021] [Accepted: 11/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
This study aimed at investigating the efficacy and safety of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in treatment of renal pelvic stone larger than 2 cm against the percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Between March 2018 and December 2020, 121 patients were randomized to undergo PCNL (60 patients), or RIRS (61 patients). Both groups were compared in terms of operative time, intraoperative complications. Postoperative complications were assessed based on Clavien-Dindo grading system. Stone-free rates were evaluated by CT scan 6 weeks after surgery. No significant difference were observed between both groups in perioperative criteria. The main operative time was slightly longer in PCNL group (105 vs 95 min, p = 0.49). Stone clearance was higher in PCNL, yet the difference was not significant. (53 patients in PCNL group had either complete clearance or residual fragments < 4 mm, compared to 49 in RIRS group (p = 0.22). Blood transfusion rate was 8.3% in PCNL compared to 1.6% in RIRS group, with a trend towards significance (p = 0.08). Post-operative fever was higher in RIRS, yet it fell just short of statistical significance (13.1% vs 5.0%, p = 0.12). Compared to PCNL, RIRS displayed acceptable efficacy with less risk of bleeding requiring transfusion. It can be applied to patients with large renal pelvic stone as an alternative to PCNL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maged Kamal Fayad
- Department of Urology, National Institute of Urology and Nephrology, Cairo, Egypt.,Department of Urology, Saudi German Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Omar Fahmy
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), 43400, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
| | | | - Nashaat M Salama
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Sharkia, Egypt.,Department of Urology, Ibn Sina College Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lee MJ, Yadav P, de Los Reyes T, Chua ME. Utilization of the Glue-clot Technique for Removal of Small Lower Pole Calculi in Pediatric Patients: Case Series. Urology 2021; 158:200-203. [PMID: 34453958 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.08.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2021] [Revised: 08/01/2021] [Accepted: 08/15/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Glue-clot technique has been described as a method to remove small stone fragments in adults undergoing endourological management of renal calculi. In this case series, we share our experience of using this technique for retrieval of stone fragments in 4 children who underwent ureterorenoscopy. The fragments were mainly located in the lower calyces rendering stone extraction challenging. We were able to achieve complete clearance in all patients. This series represents the first use of glue-clot technique in pediatric ureterorenoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Joon Lee
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Priyank Yadav
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Thomas de Los Reyes
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Michael E Chua
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada; St. Luke's Medical Center, Institute of Urology, Quezon City, NCR, Philippines
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hosseini SR, Fatahi B, Fakhr Yasseri AM. Comparison outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in prone and flank position in obese patients: A randomized clinical trial. Urologia 2021; 89:580-584. [PMID: 34396868 DOI: 10.1177/03915603211035588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to compare the complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) surgery in Flank and Prone positions in patients with a BMI above 30. METHODS In this randomized clinical trial patients were randomly assigned to PCNL treatment in one of two groups undergoing PCNL under fluoroscopic guidance in Flank or Prone positions. Patient demographic information, stone number, size and location, stent duration, hospital stay, blood loss, Creatinine, hemoglobin, hematocrit changes, and arterial blood gas changes and acid-base hemostasis were collected. RESULTS In this study, 60 patients were examined, which were divided into two groups of 29 people, prone and 31 people. Mean stone size was 3.16 ± 0.82 cm. arterial blood gases did not differ significantly between two groups. The SFR (stone free rate) in the prone and flank groups was 91.02% and 86.89%, respectively. However, SFR and Complications in the prone and flank groups were not significantly different (p value of 0.081 and 0.13, respectively). CONCLUSIONS According to the results of this study, PCNL complications and acid-base changes is not significantly different in flank and prone positions in obese patients. However, SFR is slightly lower in flank group. Thus, PCNL in flank position is not superior to prone position in obese Patients. It is recommended to choose each of these surgical methods according to the surgeon's facilities and skills.
Collapse
|
9
|
Shah C, Basnet RB, Shah A, Chhettri P, Chapagain A, Shrestha PM, Shrestha A. Stone Clearance by Computed Tomography after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc 2020; 58:587-590. [PMID: 32968293 PMCID: PMC7580361 DOI: 10.31729/jnma.5219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy has the highest stone free rate among other procedures with relatively higher complication rate. Post-operative imaging after stone surgeries has not been uniform. This study was done to study about the stone clearance by computed tomography after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Methods: The descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Urology, Bir Hospital for six months duration. The patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy and those with intra-operative fluoroscopic clearance were evaluated with a low dose computed tomography after 48 hours to assess residual fragments its size and location. Patient's demographics, stone characteristics and complications were compared between the stone free and with residual stone patients. Results: Out of 72 percutaneous nephrolithotomy performed, 40 patients were included in the study. Low dose computed tomography kidney, ureter and bladder after 48 hours of surgery detected residual fragments in 11 (27.5%) patients. The RFs size of <4mm were found in 7 (63.63%) of cases whereas RFs of >4mm were found in 4 (36.36%). The stone size was 352.47±97.47 mm2 and 254.79±172.68 mm2 in group with residual fragments and stone free group respectively. Conclusions: Low dose computed tomography kidney, ureter and bladder done for assessment of stone clearance after 48 hours of percutaneous nephrolithomy detected residual in around one fourth of patients, however majority of them had residual fragments <4mm. Intra-operative fluoroscopic clearance may over estimate stone clearance after percutaneous nephrolithomy as about one third of patients still may have residual fragments of >4mm size.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chitaranjan Shah
- Department of Urology, National Academy of Medical Sciences, Bir Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Robin Bahadur Basnet
- Department of Urology, National Academy of Medical Sciences, Bir Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Arvind Shah
- Department of Urology, National Academy of Medical Sciences, Bir Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Prakash Chhettri
- Department of Urology, National Academy of Medical Sciences, Bir Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Anup Chapagain
- Department of Urology, National Academy of Medical Sciences, Bir Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Parash Mani Shrestha
- Department of Urology, National Academy of Medical Sciences, Bir Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Anil Shrestha
- Department of Urology, National Academy of Medical Sciences, Bir Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal
| |
Collapse
|