1
|
Ancha N, Eldin M, Woodle T, Gereta S, Hariprasad K, Butler I, Charles Osterberg E. Current devices, outcomes, and pain management considerations in penile implant surgery: an updated review of the literature. Asian J Androl 2024; 26:335-343. [PMID: 38376174 PMCID: PMC11280207 DOI: 10.4103/aja202386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Penile prosthesis surgery is a definitive treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED). The two categories of penile prosthesis are endorsed by professional guidelines, inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) and malleable penile prosthesis (MPP). Each modality of penile prosthesis offers distinct advantages and incorporates specific design features, allowing for personalized device selection that aligns with individual needs and preferences. While the overall complication rate of penile implant surgery remains low, surgeons should maintain a high index of suspicion for complications in the perioperative time period. Multimodal analgesic regimens including nerve blocks and narcotic-free pathways should be administered to manage perioperative pain. Finally, the high patient satisfaction after penile prosthesis surgery underscores the success of this ED treatment option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nirupama Ancha
- Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School, Austin, TX 78712, USA
| | - Maya Eldin
- Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School, Austin, TX 78712, USA
| | - Tarah Woodle
- Department of Urology, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, TX 78234, USA
| | - Sofia Gereta
- Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School, Austin, TX 78712, USA
| | - Krishna Hariprasad
- Department of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA
| | - Imani Butler
- Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School, Austin, TX 78712, USA
| | - E Charles Osterberg
- Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School, Austin, TX 78712, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Manfredi C, Russo GI, Capogrosso P, Falcone M, Capece M, Sokolakis I, Verze P, Salonia A, Tsambarlis P, Seligra Lopes L, Romero-Otero J, DE Sio M, Levine L. Quality of life and sexuality with penile prosthesis: a systematic review and pooled analysis. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2024; 76:166-175. [PMID: 37795696 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.23.05466-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Quality of Life and Sexuality with Penile Prosthesis (QoLSPP) is the first validated questionnaire to specifically evaluate the satisfaction of patients undergoing penile prosthesis implantation. Our primary aim was to conduct a systematic review and pooled analysis of articles reporting QoLSPP. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A comprehensive bibliographic search on the MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases was performed in April 2023. Studies were selected if they assessed male subjects (P) undergoing penile prosthesis implantation (I) with or without comparison with other treatments (C), reporting the patient satisfaction according to QoLSPP (O). Prospective and retrospective original studies were included (S). The risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool and the Knoll method. Means and standard deviations (SDs) of QoLSPP scores were included in the pooled analysis. PROSPERO ID: "CRD42023427261." EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS A total of 10 studies investigating 1105 patients were included in the systematic review; of these, eight articles describing the outcomes of 693 subjects were eligible for the pooled analysis. Overall serious risk of bias was found in 2/3 of nonrandomized comparative studies (66%), while seven single-arm studies (100%) were classified as having a high risk of bias. Pooled analysis of the QoLSPP-Functional domain revealed an overall effect size (ES) of 4.22 points (95% CI 4.04-4.40; P<0.001). The QoLSPP-Relational pooled score was 4.17 points (95% CI 4.03-4.31; P<0.001). The QoLSPP-Social pooled score corresponded to 4.21 points (95% CI 4.02-4.40; P<0.001). Pooled analysis of the QoLSPP-Personal domain showed an overall ES of 3.97 points (95% CI 3.61-4.32; P<0.001). There was insufficient data to pool QoLSPP total scores. CONCLUSIONS Patients undergoing penile prosthesis implantation report positive scores in all QoLSPP domains, demonstrating high satisfaction levels. Future studies are needed to improve the evidence on the topic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celeste Manfredi
- Unit of Urology, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, Luigi Vanvitelli University of Campania, Naples, Italy -
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA -
| | - Giorgio I Russo
- Urology Section, Department of Surgery, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Paolo Capogrosso
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Ospedale di Circolo and Macchi Foundation, Varese, Italy
| | - Marco Falcone
- Department of Urology, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Marco Capece
- Urology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Ioannis Sokolakis
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Paolo Verze
- Scuola Medica Salernitana, Department of Medicine, Surgery, Dentistry, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy
| | - Andrea Salonia
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Peter Tsambarlis
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | | | - Marco DE Sio
- Unit of Urology, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, Luigi Vanvitelli University of Campania, Naples, Italy
| | - Laurence Levine
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Giordano A, Smarrazzo F, Cilio S, Califano G, Collà Ruvolo C, Verze P. History of penile implants: from implants made of bone to modern inflatable penile implants. Int J Impot Res 2023; 35:601-608. [PMID: 37085736 DOI: 10.1038/s41443-023-00695-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 04/23/2023]
Abstract
Penile prostheses are implantable devices used to definitively treat erectile dysfunction when previous forms of treatment have failed. The first example of a penile implant dates to 1935, when a rib was inserted in a neo-phallus reconstructed after a traumatic amputation. Since then, alternative artificial devices were adopted as penile prosthetic implants. The evolution of prosthetic devices had a dramatic thrust in 1973 when the first inflatable penile prosthesis was worldwide presented. Thanks to advances in device materials, design, surgical implant techniques, and perioperative management, nowadays inflatable penile prostheses are one of the most adopted definitive therapy for patients with drug-refractory erectile dysfunction or refusing alternative forms of treatments. Moreover, the clinical indications for inflatable penile prosthesis have also expanded, including female-to-male transmen or men underwent penile reconstruction due to congenital aphallia or traumatic or surgical penile amputation. In order to summarise the process behind the development and evolution of penile prosthesis, we aimed at performing a historical review of the currently available literature to provide an easy and comprehensive overview of the topic. The understanding of the historical process behind the evolution of inflatable penile prostheses will drive further innovation to increase efficiency and the rate of patients satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Giordano
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, Urology Unit, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Smarrazzo
- Urology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery, Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana", University of Salerno, Baronissi, Italy
| | - Simone Cilio
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, Urology Unit, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
| | - Gianluigi Califano
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, Urology Unit, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Claudia Collà Ruvolo
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, Urology Unit, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Paolo Verze
- Urology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery, Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana", University of Salerno, Baronissi, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Quesada-Olarte J, Nelwan D, Fernandez-Crespo R, Parker J, Carrion RE. “Pumpology”: Evolution of the Penile Implant Pump and What Is on the Horizon. CURRENT SEXUAL HEALTH REPORTS 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s11930-022-00348-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
|
5
|
Evaluation of Quality of Life After Inflatable Penile Implantation and Analysis of Factors Influencing Postsurgery Patient Satisfaction. J Sex Med 2022; 19:1472-1478. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2022.06.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2022] [Revised: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|