Increased brain dopamine D4-like binding after chronic ethanol is not associated with behavioral sensitization in mice

Chronic social defeat stress: Impacts on ethanol-induced stimulation, corticosterone response, and brain monoamine levels

BACKGROUND

Chronic exposure to stress may dysregulate the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and brain monoamine levels, contributing to the development of ethanol dependence. Exposure to chronic social defeat stress may impact ethanol-related effects, neural, and endocrine functions.

AIM

This study assessed ethanol-induced locomotor activity, corticosterone responses, and brain monoamine levels in Swiss albino mice 10 days post-exposure to chronic social defeat stress.

METHODS

During a period of 10 days, male Swiss mice were exposed to daily defeat episodes, followed by housing with an aggressive mouse for 24 h. Control mice were housed in pairs and rotated every 24 h. Ten days post-stress, locomotor behavior was recorded after a challenge with ethanol (2.2 g/kg; intraperitoneal) or saline. After the test, blood and brain samples were collected for determination of plasma corticosterone and brain monoamines across different brain areas through high-performance liquid chromatography.

RESULTS

Defeated mice failed to show a stimulant locomotor response to ethanol, while controls displayed the expected ethanol-induced stimulation. Ethanol increased plasma corticosterone levels, with lower corticosterone secretion in defeated mice. Brain monoamines were affected by social defeat and ethanol, varying in different brain regions. Social stress reduced levels of dopamine, noradrenaline, and serotonin in the hypothalamus. Defeated mice presented reduced serotonin and dopamine levels in the frontal cortex. In the striatum, ethanol treatment increased dopamine levels in controls, but failed to do so in defeated mice.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that chronic exposure to social defeat blunted ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation, and reduced ethanol-induced corticosterone secretion. Social stress promoted differential reductions in brain monoamine levels in the hypothalamus and frontal cortex and blunted ethanol-induced dopamine increases in the striatum.

Long-term exposure to daily ethanol injections in DBA/2J and Swiss mice: Lessons for the interpretation of ethanol sensitization

Most mice ethanol sensitization studies focused on neurobiology at the expense of its behavioral characterization. Furthermore, relatively short ethanol exposures (10 to 20 injections) were used in these studies. The first aim of the present study is to better characterize the development and expression of ethanol sensitization after an extended exposure of 45 daily injections. In some previous studies, mice were classified as "respondent" and "resistant" to ethanol sensitization. The second aim of the present study is to test the long-term reliability of such categorizations and the consequences of their use on the interpretation of the ethanol sensitization results. Swiss and DBA/2J female mice received 45 consecutive daily ethanol administrations (respectively 2.5 and 2.0 g/kg) and their locomotor activity was daily recorded to test the development of ethanol sensitization. At the end of the procedure, a challenge test assessed the inter-group ethanol sensitization.The results of the present study show that ethanol sensitization continues to develop beyond 20 days to reach maximal levels after about 25 injections in DBA/2J mice and 40 injections in Swiss mice, although the core phase of the development of ethanol sensitization occurred in both strains during the first 20 days. Remarkably, ethanol sensitization after such a long daily ethanol treatment resulted in both an upward shift of the magnitude of ethanol stimulant effects and a prolongation of these effects in time (up to 30 minutes). Mice classified as "resistant to ethanol sensitization" according to previous studies developed very significant levels of ethanol sensitization when tested after 45 ethanol injections and are best described as showing a delayed development of ethanol sensitization. Furthermore, mice classified as respondent or resistant to ethanol sensitization also differ in their acute response to ethanol, such that it is difficult to ascertain whether these classifications are specifically related to the sensitization process.

A role for nucleus accumbens glutamate in the expression but not the induction of behavioural sensitization to ethanol

Mechanisms underlying differential sensitivity to behavioural sensitization to ethanol (EtOH) remain poorly understood, although accumulating evidence suggests a role for glutamatergic processes in the ventral striatum. Efforts to address this issue can benefit from the well-documented fact that in any given cohort, some of the mice (High sensitized; HS) show robust sensitization, while others (Low sensitized; LS) show little, if any, sensitization. Here, we examined whether this variability might be differentially associated with nucleus accumbens (NAc) glutamate processes. Male DBA mice received 5 EtOH (2.2g/kg) or saline injections twice a week and were challenged with EtOH (1.8g/kg) 2 weeks after injection 5. When an EtOH challenge was administered 2 weeks following the induction of sensitization, HS, but not LS, mice showed a robust increase in glutamate levels (67%, P<0.01) as measured by in vivo microdialysis. In a separate cohort, the mGlu2/3 agonist LY354740 (10mg/kg), given prior to the EtOH challenge, abolished the expression of sensitization. To ascertain whether enhanced release could also be observed during the induction of sensitization, glutamate levels were measured after the 1st and 5th EtOH injection and were found to be unchanged in HS mice, although briefly elevated in LS mice at injection 5. To further assess possible glutamate involvement during the induction of sensitization, sensitizing EtOH injections were co-administered with NMDAR antagonists. At the doses used, MK-801 (0.25mg/kg) and CGS 19755 (10mg/kg) blocked the expression of sensitization, but did not significantly interfere with the development of EtOH sensitization. Within the limitations of the present design, the results suggest an important role for EtOH-induced glutamate release in the NAc when sensitization is well established, but not necessarily during the development of sensitization.

Behavioral sensitization to ethanol: Neural basis and factors that influence its acquisition and expression

Ethanol-induced behavioral sensitization (EBS) was first described in 1980, approximately 10 years after the phenomenon was described for psychostimulants. Ethanol acts on γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glutamate receptors as an allosteric agonist and antagonist, respectively, but it also affects many other molecular targets. The multiplicity of factors involved in the behavioral and neurochemical effects of ethanol and the ensuing complexity may explain much of the apparent disparate results, found across different labs, regarding ethanol-induced behavioral sensitization. Although the mesocorticolimbic dopamine system plays an important role in EBS, we provide evidence of the involvement of other neurotransmitter systems, mainly the glutamatergic, GABAergic, and opioidergic systems. This review also analyses the neural underpinnings (e.g., induction of cellular transcription factors such as cyclic adenosine monophosphate response element binding protein and growth factors, such as the brain-derived neurotrophic factor) and other factors that influence the phenomenon, including age, sex, dose, and protocols of drug administration. One of the reasons that make EBS an attractive phenomenon is the assumption, firmly based on empirical evidence, that EBS and addiction-related processes have common molecular and neural basis. Therefore, EBS has been used as a model of addiction processes. We discuss the association between different measures of ethanol-induced reward and EBS. Parallels between the pharmacological basis of EBS and acute motor effects of ethanol are also discussed.

Correlation between ethanol behavioral sensitization and midbrain dopamine neuron reactivity to ethanol

Repeated ethanol injections lead to a sensitization of its stimulant effects in mice. Some recent results argue against a role for ventral tegmental area (VTA) dopamine neurons in ethanol behavioral sensitization. The aim of the present study was to test whether in vivo ethanol locomotor sensitization correlates with changes in either basal- or ethanol-evoked firing rates of dopamine neurons in vitro. Female Swiss mice were daily injected with 2.5 g/kg ethanol (or saline in the control group) for 7 days and their locomotor activity was recorded. At the end of the sensitization procedure, extracellular recordings were made from dopaminergic neurons in midbrain slices from these mice. Significantly higher spontaneous basal firing rates of dopamine neurons were recorded in ethanol-sensitized mice relative to control mice, but without correlations with the behavioral effects. The superfusion of sulpiride, a dopamine D2 antagonist, induced a stronger increase of dopamine neuron firing rates in ethanol-sensitized mice. This shows that the D2 feedback in dopamine neurons is preserved after chronic ethanol administration and argues against a reduced D2 feedback as an explanation for the increased dopamine neuron basal firing rates in ethanol-sensitized mice. Finally, ethanol superfusion (10-100 mM) significantly increased the firing rates of dopamine neurons and this effect was of higher magnitude in ethanol-sensitized mice. Furthermore, there were significant correlations between such a sensitization of dopamine neuron activity and ethanol behavioral sensitization. These results support the hypothesis that changes in brain dopamine neuron activity contribute to the behavioral sensitization of the stimulant effects of ethanol.

Expression of behavioral sensitization to ethanol is increased by energy drink administration

Alcohol abuse and dependence are important medical, social and economical problems, affecting millions of people. A relatively recent habit among young people is mixing alcohol with energy drinks (ED), in spite of the risks involved may be higher than those associated with alcohol consumption alone. The mixture of alcohol and energy drinks, both with stimulant properties, may alter the perception of intoxication and could lead individuals to believe they are less drunk and can drink more or for longer periods of time. In animals, the repeated administration of ethanol can lead to a progressive increase of the locomotor stimulant effect, known as behavioral sensitization, a drug-dependent behavioral plasticity associated with vulnerability to addiction. As well as for addiction, there are clear individual differences in the level of sensitization to ethanol among species and even among individuals from the same strain. The present study assessed how ED affects the expression of ethanol sensitization. Female mice chronically treated with ethanol (2.4 g/kg) were classified as low-sensitized or high-sensitized. Two days later, different groups of mice were submitted to saline+water, ethanol+water or ethanol+ED systemic challenges. As expected, only the high-sensitized group expressed clear sensitization after ethanol administration. However, the administration of ethanol+ED triggered the sensitization expression in the low-sensitized group. These data indicate that the combined use of ED and ethanol can potentiate the stimulant and, consequently, the reward effects of ethanol in previously treated mice. If a similar process occurs in human beings, the use of ED can increase the risk of developing alcohol abuse or dependence.

Locomotor sensitization to ethanol impairs NMDA receptor-dependent synaptic plasticity in the nucleus accumbens and increases ethanol self-administration

Although alcoholism is a worldwide problem resulting in millions of deaths, only a small percentage of alcohol users become addicted. The specific neural substrates responsible for individual differences in vulnerability to alcohol addiction are not known. In this study, we used rodent models to study behavioral and synaptic correlates related to individual differences in the development of ethanol locomotor sensitization, a form of drug-dependent behavioral plasticity associated with addiction vulnerability. Male Swiss Webster mice were treated daily with saline or 1.8 g/kg ethanol for 21 d. Locomotor activity tests were performed once a week for 15 min immediately after saline or ethanol injections. After at least 11 d of withdrawal, cohorts of saline- or ethanol-treated mice were used to characterize the relationships between locomotor sensitization, ethanol drinking, and glutamatergic synaptic transmission in the nucleus accumbens. Ethanol-treated mice that expressed locomotor sensitization to ethanol drank significantly more ethanol than saline-treated subjects and ethanol-treated animals resilient to this form of behavioral plasticity. Moreover, ethanol-sensitized mice also had reduced accumbal NMDA receptor function and expression, as well as deficits in NMDA receptor-dependent long-term depression in the nucleus accumbens core after a protracted withdrawal. These findings suggest that disruption of accumbal core NMDA receptor-dependent plasticity may represent a synaptic correlate associated with ethanol-induced locomotor sensitization and increased propensity to consume ethanol.

Accumbal dopamine D2 receptor function is associated with individual variability in ethanol behavioral sensitization

Striatal dopamine D2 receptors have been implicated in the development of behavioral sensitization after repeated exposure to drugs of abuse. There are clear individual differences in the level of sensitization to ethanol among species and even among individuals from the same strain. Albino Swiss mice treated with ethanol (2.2 g/kg) have been shown to present clear variations in the development of sensitization. While some mice developed ethanol (EtOH) induced sensitization, others did not. This variability was associated with differences in D2 dopaminergic receptor binding. In the present study, we evaluated the functional relevance of dopamine D2 receptor by measuring, in sensitized and non-sensitized mice, the locomotor response to a D2 receptor agonist (quinpirole, 0.5 and 2.0 mg/kg i.p. or 0.01 and 0.2 μg/side intra-accumbens) or antagonist (sulpiride, 10 or 50 mg/kg i.p. or 0.02 μg/side intra-accumbens + ethanol i.p.). Whereas the systemic administration of quinpirole decreased locomotor activity in a similar way in all the groups, intra-nucleus accumbens (NAc) administration induced significantly higher locomotor stimulation in the sensitized group alone. Our data show that functionally hyperresponsive D2 receptors are present in the NAcs of sensitized but not non-sensitized mice, suggesting that this could be a biomarker of behavioral sensitization. Furthermore, i.p. administration of sulpiride blocked the expression of sensitization in the sensitized group, and intra-NAc administration attenuated it, indicating that the activation of accumbal D2 receptors is essential for the expression of EtOH behavioral sensitization. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled 'Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder'.

Nucleus accumbens dopamine D₁ receptors regulate the expression of ethanol-induced behavioural sensitization

Repeated ethanol administration may induce behavioural sensitization, defined as a progressive potentiation of locomotor stimulant effects. This process is associated with neuroadaptations in the mesolimbic pathway and the nucleus accumbens. The aim of the present study was to analyse dopamine D₁ receptor (D₁R) participation in locomotor response to an agonist and an antagonist of the D₁R in mice with different levels of sensitization to ethanol. In three separate experiments, mice received administrations of 2.2 g/kg ethanol or saline every other day for 10 d. According to their locomotor response on the last day, ethanol-treated animals were classified into two groups: sensitized or non-sensitized. After the treatment, mice were challenged with 4 or 8 mg/kg SKF-38393 (i.p.), a D₁R agonist (expt 1); or with 0.01 or 0.1 mg/kg SCH-23390 (i.p.), a D₁R antagonist, followed by 2.2 g/kg ethanol (i.p.) administration (expt 2). In expt 3, mice were challenged with intra-accumbens (intra-NAc) SKF-38393 (1 μg/side, in 0.2 μl), and with intra-NAc SCH-23390 (3 μg/side, in 0.2 μl) followed by 2.2 g/kg ethanol (i.p.). Although the i.p. administration of SKF-38393 did not affect the locomotion of mice, the intra-NAc administration of SKF-38393 significantly increased the locomotor activity in sensitized mice, suggesting that sensitized mice present functionally hyperresponsive D₁Rs in the NAc. Both i.p. and intra-NAc administration of SCH-23390 blocked the expression of ethanol sensitization, suggesting that the activation of NAc D₁Rs seems to be essential for the expression of ethanol sensitization.

A functional role for the dopamine D3 receptor in the induction and expression of behavioural sensitization to ethanol in mice

RATIONALE

We previously reported that mice lacking dopamine D3 receptors (D3R) were resistant to behavioural sensitization to ethanol (EtOH). Since knockout mice have permanent receptor inactivation, we investigated how temporary pharmacological blockade and activation of D3Rs affected the induction or expression of EtOH sensitization.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

In induction studies, DBA/2 mice received 0, 10 or 75 mg/kg, subcutaneous (s.c.) of the D3R antagonist, U99194A ,before each of seven EtOH (2.2 g/kg, intraperitoneal) or saline injections. Locomotor activity (LMA) was assessed in activity chambers. In expression studies, mice received seven injections of EtOH or saline, followed 14 days later with U99194A or vehicle immediately before a test dose of EtOH (1.8 g/kg). In separate experiments, the effects of the D3R agonist PD128907 (0.01 mg/kg, s.c.) were similarly examined during and after EtOH sensitization.

RESULTS

Chronic co-administration of low-dose U99194A blocked the induction of EtOH sensitization, while acute U99194A had no effect in mice that were already sensitized. Chronic co-administration of PD128907 resulted in decreased LMA but this effect was also seen in saline-treated mice, suggesting a simple subtractive effect. In previously sensitized mice, acute PD128907 significantly attenuated the expression of EtOH sensitization, indicating an enhanced response to the drug.

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest a modulatory role for the D3R in behavioural sensitization to EtOH, where D3R blockade is associated with induction and D3R stimulation is associated with expression of EtOH sensitization. A model is suggested to account for these complementary functions of the D3R at different stages of EtOH sensitization.

Morphine attenuates the expression of sensitization to ethanol, but opioid antagonists do not

Behavioral sensitization to ethanol is characterized by an increased locomotor activity after repeated exposure. A great variability exists among species and strains in the development of sensitization. There is a growing amount of evidence to indicate that the opioid system is involved in alcoholism; it is possible, therefore, that this system also modulates the sensitization to ethanol. In this study we evaluated the role of the opioid system in determining the variability of the sensitized response to ethanol. Mice received repeated administrations of ethanol (2.2 g/kg) or saline every other day for 10 days. According to their locomotor response on the last day of treatment, ethanol-treated animals were classified into two groups: sensitized or non-sensitized mice. After the treatment, mice were submitted to four challenges 48 h apart. In experiments 1 and 2, mice were challenged, respectively, with i.p. administration of opioid antagonists (naloxone or naltrexone) or an opioid agonist (morphine), followed immediately by 2.2 g/kg ethanol. In experiment 3, animals received morphine by i.c.v., followed by 2.2 g/kg of ethanol (i.p.). Pretreatment with opioid antagonists (naloxone or naltrexone) did not block the expression of ethanol sensitization; however pretreatment with morphine attenuated the increased locomotor activity after ethanol administration in sensitized mice. In experiment 4, after the ethanol or saline treatment, mice brains were processed and brain mu opioid binding was assessed by autoradiography using [3H]D-Ala2,N-mePhe4, Gly-ol5-enkephalin ([3H]DAMGO). No differences were seen between any of the groups of mice, so the agonist effect is not likely to be mediated by differences in binding to mu opioid receptors.

Does context influence the duration of locomotor sensitization to ethanol in female DBA/2J mice?

RATIONALE

Repeated exposure to ethanol produces a progressive increase in locomotor sensitivity, referred to as locomotor sensitization. Locomotor sensitization may persist for some time after termination of repeated drug exposure, and context appears to facilitate expression of the behavioral phenomenon. However, many unanswered questions remain concerning the persistence of and degree to which context influences locomotor sensitization to alcohol (ethanol).

OBJECTIVES

The goal of the present work was to determine the duration of locomotor sensitization to ethanol and the degree to which context dependence positively influences the induction, expression, and persistence of the behavioral phenomenon in female DBA/2J mice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sensitized (with or without ethanol-paired exposure to the testing chamber) and non-sensitized saline control mice were left undisturbed in their home cages until subsequent ethanol challenge and testing in the locomotor activity testing chambers 7, 14, 21, 28, 42, 56, and/or 70 days after cessation of the ethanol sensitization procedure. Retro-orbital sinus bloods were sampled to determine whether the sensitization procedure had altered blood ethanol clearance rates.

RESULTS

Locomotor sensitization persisted through post-sensitization day 14, and repeated paring of the drug and testing context prolonged the expression of this phenomenon through at least post-sensitization day 28. Blood ethanol concentrations did not differ.

CONCLUSIONS

Locomotor sensitization to ethanol persists for some time after cessation of repeated ethanol exposure, and the association of contextual cues with the ethanol experience lengthens this persistence. The present data lay the groundwork for investigations into the neuroadaptive changes that underlie locomotor sensitization to ethanol in mice.

Long maternal separation accelerates behavioural sensitization to ethanol in female, but not in male mice

Early life stress is associated with dysfunction of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, and with aspects involved in drug abuse. In this study, we investigated the effects of brief (BMS) and long maternal separation (LMS) on the HPA axis response and behavioural sensitization to ethanol (EtOH) in male and female mice. From PND 2 to 14, pups were subjected to daily maternal separation for 15 min (BMS) or 180 min (LMS) or no separated, only handled during cage cleaning (animal facility rearing-AFR). As adults, animals were treated every other day with saline (SAL) or EtOH (2.2g/kg), i.p., for 10 days, and immediately after each administration, their locomotor response was evaluated for 15 min. Forty-eight hours after the 5th administration, all animals were challenged with saline, followed 48 h later, by an EtOH challenge. Corticosterone (CORT) plasma levels were determined 3 times: basal, after the 1st administration and after the EtOH challenge. LMS females showed higher CORT levels than BMS females at basal, but not in response to acute or chronic EtOH administration. The CORT response to EtOH was more robust in LMS and BMS male than AFR male mice. Repeated EtOH treatment induced behavioural sensitization in all groups of male mice. In females, LMS induced a faster sensitization, although BMS females also exhibited behavioural sensitization (4th day and 5th day of treatment, respectively). In conclusion, LMS and BMS produced gender-dependent effects. In females, LMS and BMS facilitated the development of behavioural sensitization, but in the LMS group this effect occurred faster, which may represent increased vulnerability to drug abuse. Moreover, LMS females showed higher basal CORT levels compared to BMS. In males, LMS and BMS increased the CORT response to EtOH but did not modify behavioural sensitization. Therefore, we postulate that LMS female mice exhibited a faster development of behavioural sensitization, but CORT levels were not involved with this effect.