1
|
Primary aeromedical retrieval crew composition: Do different teams impact clinical outcomes? A descriptive systematic review. CAN J EMERG MED 2020; 22:S89-S103. [PMID: 33084563 DOI: 10.1017/cem.2020.404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Military Forward Aeromedical Evacuation and civilian Helicopter Emergency Medical Services are widely used to conduct Primary Aeromedical Retrieval. Crew composition in Primary Aeromedical Retrieval missions varies considerably. The ideal composition is unknown. Thus, we conducted a descriptive systematic review on mortality and other outcomes for different Primary Aeromedical Retrieval crew compositions. METHODS Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were searched up to January 2020. Results were reported per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Studies of adult trauma air transported by different crews were included. Population, injury severity, crew composition, procedures, and outcomes, including mortality, were abstracted. Risk of bias was assessed using previously validated tools. A lack of reported effect measures precluded a quantitative analysis. RESULTS Sixteen studies met inclusion criteria (3 prospective studies, 1 case-control, and 12 retrospective). Overall, studies reported a mortality benefit associated with advanced health care providers. This was most apparent in patients with severe but survivable injuries. In this population, early rapid sequence induction, endotracheal intubation, mechanical ventilation, thoracostomies, blood products transfusion, and treatment of hemorrhagic shock are better performed by advanced providers and may improve outcomes. The quality of evidence reported a moderate risk of bias in the included studies. CONCLUSIONS Overall, findings were divergent but showed a trend to decreased mortality in patients treated by advanced providers with interventions beyond the basic paramedic level. This trend was most significant in patients with severe but survivable injuries. These results should be cautiously interpreted because most studies were observational, had small sample sizes, and had a high potential for confounding factors.
Collapse
|
2
|
Tønsager K, Krüger AJ, Ringdal KG, Rehn M. Data quality of Glasgow Coma Scale and Systolic Blood Pressure in scientific studies involving physician-staffed emergency medical services: Systematic review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2020; 64:888-909. [PMID: 32270473 DOI: 10.1111/aas.13596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2019] [Revised: 03/19/2020] [Accepted: 03/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Emergency physicians on-scene provide highly specialized care to severely sick or injured patients. High-quality research relies on the quality of data, but no commonly accepted definition of EMS data quality exits. Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) and Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) are core physiological variables, but little is known about the quality of these data when reported in p-EMS research. This systematic review aims to describe the quality of pre-hospital reporting of GCS and SBP data in studies where emergency physicians are present on-scene. METHODS A systematic literature search was performed using CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, Medline, Norart, Scopus, SweMed + and Web of Science, in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Reported data on accuracy of reporting, completeness and capture were extracted to describe the quality of documentation of GCS and SBP. External and internal validity assessment was performed by extracting a set of predefined variables. RESULTS We included 137 articles describing data collection for GCS, SBP or both. Most studies (81%) were conducted in Europe and 59% of studies reported trauma cases. Reporting of GCS and SBP data were not uniform and may be improved to enable comparisons. Of the predefined external and internal validity data items, 26%-45% of data were possible to extract from the included papers. CONCLUSIONS Reporting of GCS and SBP is variable in scientific papers. We recommend standardized reporting to enable comparisons of p-EMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin Tønsager
- Department of Research The Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation Oslo Norway
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Stavanger University Hospital Stavanger Norway
- Faculty of Health Sciences University of Stavanger Stavanger Norway
| | - Andreas J. Krüger
- Department of Research The Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation Oslo Norway
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Pre-Hospital Services St. Olavs Hospital Trondheim Norway
| | - Kjetil G. Ringdal
- Department of Anaesthesiology Vestfold Hospital Trust Tønsberg Norway
- Norwegian Trauma Registry Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway
| | - Marius Rehn
- Department of Research The Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation Oslo Norway
- Faculty of Health Sciences University of Stavanger Stavanger Norway
- Pre-hospital Division Air Ambulance DepartmentOslo University Hospital Oslo Norway
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Homma H, Niiyama Y, Sonoda H, Himuro N, Yamakage M. The Impact of Air Transport for Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients. Air Med J 2019; 38:73-77. [PMID: 30898287 DOI: 10.1016/j.amj.2018.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2018] [Revised: 10/09/2018] [Accepted: 11/16/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE For patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within 120 minutes from onset is recommended. A helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) is useful for transporting ACS patients. The purposes of this study were to investigate whether patients with ACS in the eastern part of Hokkaido could be transported to a PCI hospital by HEMS and undergo PCI within 120 minutes and to clarify the factors most related to delayed access to PCI. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study that analyzed 513 patients diagnosed with ACS at our institution, an HEMS base/PCI hospital. We investigated transport modes for each patient and identified the processes by which access to PCI was delayed. RESULTS HEMS reduced transport time compared with ground emergency medical services but did not contribute to access to PCI within 120 minutes. The most important factor was transport directly to a PCI hospital (P < .01). CONCLUSION HEMS did not achieve a total transport time of patients to a PCI hospital within 120 minutes from onset. Transport using HEMS is insufficient to access early PCI; patient condition must also be considered to determine whether to go through a non-PCI hospital.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hironori Homma
- Department of Anesthesiology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Yukitoshi Niiyama
- Department of Anesthesiology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Hokkaido, Japan.
| | - Hajime Sonoda
- Department of Anesthesiology, Kushiro City General Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Nobuaki Himuro
- Department of Public Health, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Michiaki Yamakage
- Department of Anesthesiology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Hokkaido, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Haugland H, Uleberg O, Klepstad P, Krüger A, Rehn M. Quality measurement in physician-staffed emergency medical services: a systematic literature review. Int J Qual Health Care 2019; 31:2-10. [PMID: 29767795 PMCID: PMC6387994 DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2017] [Revised: 02/14/2018] [Accepted: 04/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Quality measurement of physician-staffed emergency medical services (P-EMS) is necessary to improve service quality. Knowledge and consensus on this topic are scarce, making quality measurement of P-EMS a high-priority research area. The aim of this review was to identify, describe and evaluate studies of quality measurement in P-EMS. DATA SOURCES The databases of MEDLINE and Embase were searched initially, followed by a search for included article citations in Scopus. STUDY SELECTION The study eligibility criteria were: (1) articles describing the use of one quality indicator (QI) or more in P-EMS, (2) original manuscripts, (3) articles published from 1 January 1968 until 5 October 2016. The literature search identified 4699 records. 4543 were excluded after reviewing title and abstract. An additional 129 were excluded based on a full-text review. The remaining 27 papers were included in the analysis. Methodological quality was assessed using an adapted critical appraisal tool. DATA EXTRACTION The description of used QIs and methods of quality measurement was extracted. Variables describing the involved P-EMSs were extracted as well. RESULTS OF DATA SYNTHESIS In the included papers, a common understanding of which QIs to use in P-EMS did not exist. Fifteen papers used only a single QI. The most widely used QIs were 'Adherence to medical protocols', 'Provision of advanced interventions', 'Response time' and 'Adverse events'. CONCLUSION The review demonstrated a lack of shared understanding of which QIs to use in P-EMS. Moreover, papers using only one QI dominated the literature, thus increasing the risk of a narrow perspective in quality measurement. Future quality measurement in P-EMS should rely on a set of consensus-based QIs, ensuring a comprehensive approach to quality measurement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helge Haugland
- Department of Research and Development, Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, Drøbak, Norway
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Pre-Hospital Services, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Medical Faculty, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Oddvar Uleberg
- Department of Research and Development, Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, Drøbak, Norway
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Pre-Hospital Services, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Medical Faculty, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Pål Klepstad
- Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Medical Faculty, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, St. Olav University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Andreas Krüger
- Department of Research and Development, Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, Drøbak, Norway
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Pre-Hospital Services, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Medical Faculty, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Marius Rehn
- Department of Research and Development, Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, Drøbak, Norway
- Department of Health Studies, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
- Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Department of Anaesthesia, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Deeb JG, Walter N, Carrico C, Gašperin M, Deeb GR. Helicopter Mountain Rescue in Slovenia from 2011 to 2015. Wilderness Environ Med 2018; 29:5-10. [PMID: 29331295 DOI: 10.1016/j.wem.2017.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2016] [Revised: 08/16/2017] [Accepted: 08/17/2017] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The popularity of adventure recreation in wilderness areas across the world continues to increase. Nevertheless, the risk of injury and illness remains significant. The purpose of this study is to analyze the mountain rescue operations performed in Slovenia between 2011 and 2015. METHODS This retrospective study reports mountain rescue operations documented by the Slovenian National Mountain Rescue Association. The annual number of ground-based and helicopter-based rescues were identified and compared. For 2015, the indication for rescue and the severity of injury were also analyzed, specifically for interventions requiring the use of a helicopter. RESULTS From 2011 through 2015, the number of rescues remained consistent with an annual average of 413 (SD ±15; range, 393-434) rescues. However, the percentage of ground-based rescues varied significantly year by year (P=0.016), with highest rate in 2014 (68%) and the lowest in 2015 (56%). In 2015, 434 mountain rescue operations were reported in Slovenia. Injury accounted for 44%, illness for 10%, and fatality for 9% of the rescues. In 37%, no illness or injury was reported. Helicopter rescue was used in 190 (44%) of all interventions. Among the 190 helicopter rescues, 49% of patients had nonfatal injuries, 29% required no medical treatment, 15% had illness, and 7% had fatal injuries. CONCLUSIONS A significant number of mountain rescue operations were conducted in Slovenia from 2011 through 2015. Most of these were needed for injured, ill, or deceased persons. A notable number of rescues in 2015 required a helicopter.
Collapse
|
6
|
Monsieurs K, Nolan J, Bossaert L, Greif R, Maconochie I, Nikolaou N, Perkins G, Soar J, Truhlář A, Wyllie J, Zideman D. Kurzdarstellung. Notf Rett Med 2015. [DOI: 10.1007/s10049-015-0097-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
|
7
|
|
8
|
Monsieurs KG, Nolan JP, Bossaert LL, Greif R, Maconochie IK, Nikolaou NI, Perkins GD, Soar J, Truhlář A, Wyllie J, Zideman DA, Alfonzo A, Arntz HR, Askitopoulou H, Bellou A, Beygui F, Biarent D, Bingham R, Bierens JJ, Böttiger BW, Bossaert LL, Brattebø G, Brugger H, Bruinenberg J, Cariou A, Carli P, Cassan P, Castrén M, Chalkias AF, Conaghan P, Deakin CD, De Buck ED, Dunning J, De Vries W, Evans TR, Eich C, Gräsner JT, Greif R, Hafner CM, Handley AJ, Haywood KL, Hunyadi-Antičević S, Koster RW, Lippert A, Lockey DJ, Lockey AS, López-Herce J, Lott C, Maconochie IK, Mentzelopoulos SD, Meyran D, Monsieurs KG, Nikolaou NI, Nolan JP, Olasveengen T, Paal P, Pellis T, Perkins GD, Rajka T, Raffay VI, Ristagno G, Rodríguez-Núñez A, Roehr CC, Rüdiger M, Sandroni C, Schunder-Tatzber S, Singletary EM, Skrifvars MB, Smith GB, Smyth MA, Soar J, Thies KC, Trevisanuto D, Truhlář A, Vandekerckhove PG, de Voorde PV, Sunde K, Urlesberger B, Wenzel V, Wyllie J, Xanthos TT, Zideman DA. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: Section 1. Executive summary. Resuscitation 2015; 95:1-80. [PMID: 26477410 DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 568] [Impact Index Per Article: 63.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Koenraad G Monsieurs
- Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Jerry P Nolan
- Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Royal United Hospital, Bath, UK; School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Robert Greif
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland; University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Ian K Maconochie
- Paediatric Emergency Medicine Department, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust and BRC Imperial NIHR, Imperial College, London, UK
| | | | - Gavin D Perkins
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK; Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jasmeet Soar
- Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - Anatolij Truhlář
- Emergency Medical Services of the Hradec Králové Region, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic; Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
| | - Jonathan Wyllie
- Department of Neonatology, The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Truhlář A, Deakin CD, Soar J, Khalifa GEA, Alfonzo A, Bierens JJLM, Brattebø G, Brugger H, Dunning J, Hunyadi-Antičević S, Koster RW, Lockey DJ, Lott C, Paal P, Perkins GD, Sandroni C, Thies KC, Zideman DA, Nolan JP, Böttiger BW, Georgiou M, Handley AJ, Lindner T, Midwinter MJ, Monsieurs KG, Wetsch WA. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: Section 4. Cardiac arrest in special circumstances. Resuscitation 2015; 95:148-201. [PMID: 26477412 DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 532] [Impact Index Per Article: 59.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Anatolij Truhlář
- Emergency Medical Services of the Hradec Králové Region, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic; Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
| | - Charles D Deakin
- Cardiac Anaesthesia and Cardiac Intensive Care, NIHR Southampton Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit, Southampton University Hospital NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Jasmeet Soar
- Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Annette Alfonzo
- Departments of Renal and Internal Medicine, Victoria Hospital, Kirkcaldy, Fife, UK
| | | | - Guttorm Brattebø
- Bergen Emergency Medical Services, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Hermann Brugger
- EURAC Institute of Mountain Emergency Medicine, Bozen, Italy
| | - Joel Dunning
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK
| | | | - Rudolph W Koster
- Department of Cardiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - David J Lockey
- Intensive Care Medicine and Anaesthesia, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK; School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, UK
| | - Carsten Lott
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg-Universitaet, Mainz, Germany
| | - Peter Paal
- Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK; Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University Hospital Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Gavin D Perkins
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK; Critical Care Unit, Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Claudio Sandroni
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Catholic University School of Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | | | - David A Zideman
- Department of Anaesthetics, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Jerry P Nolan
- Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Royal United Hospital, Bath, UK; School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|