Safe Interfacility Transport of Pediatric Patients: Medical Control Training, an Interdisciplinary Approach

Pediatric Interfacility Transport Curriculum: Its Impact on the Pediatric Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine Fellows' Performance and Confidence

OBJECTIVE

Pediatric interfacility transports are frequent. Despite the absence of a formal pediatric transport curriculum in eastern Canada, directly managing patients during transport and medical direction of the referring center and transport team are part of the pediatric critical care medicine (PCCM) and pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) program requirements. The authors developed a pediatric interfacility transport curriculum and measured its impact on fellows' confidence and performance.

METHODS

This was a pilot interventional prospective study in Montreal, Canada. Postcurriculum surveys were used to measure confidence, and high-fidelity simulations were used to measure performance. A target threshold for confidence was defined before implementation, and pre- and post values were compared. The simulation scenario and assessment checklist were locally developed.

RESULTS

The participants were 11 PCCM and 3 PEM fellows. The content of the curriculum and educational methods were selected based on the literature and a needs assessment survey. All participants rated themselves as confident at the end of the curriculum. Eighty-three percent of the participants were deemed proficient with a perfect interrater agreement.

CONCLUSION

The pediatric transport curriculum had a positive impact on PEM and PCCM fellows' confidence and performance in transport. Further studies should look at the impact of such a curriculum on participants' real-life performance and patient care.

Transport Medical Control Education for Pediatric Critical Care Fellows: A National Needs Assessment Study

OBJECTIVES

Characterize transport medical control education in Pediatric Critical Care Medicine fellowship.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey study.

SETTING

Pediatric Critical Care Medicine fellowship programs in the United States.

SUBJECTS

Pediatric Critical Care Medicine fellowship program directors.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We achieved a 74% (53/72) response rate. A majority of programs (85%) require fellows to serve as transport medical control, usually while carrying out other clinical responsibilities and sometimes without supervision. Fellows at most programs (80%) also accompany the transport team on patient retrievals. Most respondents (72%) reported formalized transport medical control teaching, primarily in a didactic format (76%). Few programs (25%) use a standardized assessment tool. Transport medical control was identified as requiring all six Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education competencies, with emphasis on professionalism and interpersonal and communication skills.

CONCLUSIONS

Transport medical control responsibilities are common for Pediatric Critical Care Medicine fellows, but training is inconsistent, assessment is not standardized, and supervision may be lacking. Fellow performance in transport medical control may help inform assessment in multiple domains of competencies. Further study is needed to identify effective methods for transport medical control education.

Evaluation of Physicians' Attitudes Regarding Transport Modalities

OBJECTIVE

Hospital mergers have made interhospital transfers necessary in the consolidation of medical services. Physicians must make decisions on the level of interfacility transport modalities (ITMs). We sought to assess physician knowledge of and comfort with ITMs.

METHODS

A survey was e-mailed to 2,510 physicians in a health care system. Participation was voluntary and anonymous. The mean and median Likert values were calculated overall. Similar calculations were performed for emergency medicine physicians (EMPs) and critical care physicians (CCPs). These calculations were compared with those for noncritical care physicians (NCCPs) using the t-test and Mann-Whitney test.

RESULTS

Of the 181 physicians who responded, 169 physicians identified a specialty. Sixty-nine were EMPs/CCPs, whereas 100 were NCCPs. The mean and median Likert values were statistically significantly higher for EMPs/CCPs compared with NCCPs (P < .0001) in the areas of knowledge of ITMs, comfort in choosing ITMs, and knowledge in choosing ground versus air critical care transport (CCT). The most important factor for using ground or air CCT was patient stability. Sixty percent believed air CCT to be faster than ground.

CONCLUSION

EMPs/CCPs seem to be more comfortable with ITMs than NCCPs. Further research should evaluate whether educational interventions lead to a more appropriate use of ITMs.