A Service Evaluation of Prehospital Blood Transfusion by Critical Care Paramedics in British Columbia, Canada

Prehospital blood transfusion in Brazil: results of the first year of implementation in an emergency medical service

INTRODUCTION

Hemorrhagic shock is the main cause of death in the prehospital environment, which highlights the need to standardize measures aiming at bleeding control and volume replacement in this environment. In Brazil, the first prehospital packed red blood cell transfusion service started in September 2020, in Bragança Paulista, state of São Paulo.

OBJECTIVES

Describe the trends and characteristics of patients who received prehospital transfusions prior to hospital treatment during the first year of operation.

METHODS

A retrospective data review was made of all patients who received transfusions from the mobile intensive care unit in Bragança Paulista over one year.

RESULTS

In this period, 19 patients were transfused. Since activation, the average response time was 20 min. The mean shock indexes before and after blood transfusion were 2.16 and 1.1, respectively. During the course of the 1st year of prehospital transfusions, no blood was wasted and there were no adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

Introduction of the prehospital packed red blood cell transfusion service was successful, with significant improvement in hemodynamic parameters.

Development of a national out-of-hospital transfusion protocol: a modified RAND Delphi study

BACKGROUND

Early resuscitation with blood components or products is emerging as best practice in selected patients with trauma and medical patients; as a result, out-of-hospital transfusion (OHT) programs are being developed based on limited and often conflicting evidence. This study aimed to provide guidance to Canadian critical care transport organizations on the development of OHT protocols.

METHODS

The study period was July 2021 to June 2022. We used a modified RAND Delphi process to achieve consensus on statements created by the study team guiding various aspects of OHT in the context of critical care transport. Purposive sampling ensured representative distribution of participants in regard to geography and relevant clinical specialties. We conducted 2 written survey Delphi rounds, followed by a virtual panel discussion (round 3). Consensus was defined as a median score of at least 6 on a Likert scale ranging from 1 ("Definitely should not include") to 7 ("Definitely should include"). Statements that did not achieve consensus in the first 2 rounds were discussed and voted on during the panel discussion.

RESULTS

Seventeen subject experts participated in the study, all of whom completed the 3 Delphi rounds. After the study process was completed, a total of 39 statements were agreed on, covering the following domains: general oversight and clinical governance, storage and transport of blood components and products, initiation of OHT, types of blood components and products, delivery and monitoring of OHT, indications for and use of hemostatic adjuncts, and resuscitation targets of OHT.

INTERPRETATION

This expert consensus document provides guidance on OHT best practices. The consensus statements should support efficient and safe OHT in national and international critical care transport programs.

Prediction of massive transfusion with the Revised Assessment of Bleeding and Transfusion (RABT) score at Canadian level I trauma centers

BACKGROUND

Early damage control resuscitation and massive transfusion (MT) protocol activations improve outcomes in trauma patients with hemorrhagic shock, where scores to guide MT prediction are used including: the Assessment of Blood Consumption (ABC), Shock Index (SI), and Revised Assessment of Bleeding and Transfusion (RABT) scores. Our aim was to validate the RABT score in patients from two level I trauma centers in Canada.

METHODS

A retrospective review of adult patients meeting trauma team activation criteria receiving >1 unit of red blood cells (RBCs) within 24 h of admission, from 2015 to 2020, was conducted. A RABT score ≥ 2, ABC score ≥ 2, and Shock Index (SI) ≥ 1 was used to predict MT using both research (≥10 RBCs in 24 h) and clinical (≥3 RBCs in 3 h) definitions. Scores were assessed and compared using sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC).

RESULTS

We analyzed 514 patients with a mean age of 44.4 (19.2) years and a median injury severity score of 29 [18-38]. For both MT definitions, the RABT score trended towards higher sensitivity and lower specificity compared to ABC score and SI. For both research and clinical definitions of MT, the AUROC for the RABT score was not significantly higher (Research - RABT: 0.673 [0.610-0.735], ABC: 0.642 [0.551-0.734], SI 0.691 [0.625-0.757]; Clinical - RABT: 0.653 [0.608-0.698], ABC: 0.646 [0.600-0.691], SI 0.610 [0.559-0.660]).

CONCLUSION

The RABT score is a valid tool for predicting the need for MTPs, performing similarly with a trend towards higher sensitivity when compared to the ABC score and SI.