Effectiveness of sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for the treatment of coronary artery disease in octogenarians

Comparison of three age groups regarding safety and efficacy of drug-eluting stents (from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Dynamic Registry)

Limited data exist regarding drug-eluting stent (DES) versus bare metal stent (BMS) use in older patients. From the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Dynamic Registry, 5,089 percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-treated patients were studied (October 2001 to August 2006). The differences in 1-year safety (death, myocardial infarction, and their composite) and efficacy (target vessel revascularization [TVR] with PCI and repeat revascularization) outcomes were compared between the patients who received DESs versus BMSs within each age group: <65 years (n = 2,680); 65 to 79 years (n = 1,942); ≥80 years (n = 443). No differences were found in the safety outcomes by stent type in any age group at 1 year. Regarding the effectiveness, lower rates of TVR with PCI and repeat revascularization were observed in the DES patients across all age groups. After propensity-adjusted analysis, the risk of TVR with PCI and repeat revascularization favored DES versus BMS with patients <65 years old (7.4% vs 14.6%, hazard ratio [HR] 0.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32 to 0.60; 12.3% vs and 17.4%, HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.84, respectively), 65 to 79 years old (4.8% vs 9.5%, HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.80; and 7.6% vs 12.3%, HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.88, respectively), and ≥80 years old (4.5% vs 10.4%, HR 0.15, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.44; and 6.0% vs 14.5%, HR 0.18, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.40, respectively). In conclusion, significant reductions in TVR with PCI and repeat revascularization were noted in all 3 age groups without increases in death or myocardial infarction in this large multicenter PCI registry. Our data support the use of DES, regardless of age.

Safety and efficacy of coronary drug-eluting stents in octogenarians

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

The effectiveness of coronary drug-eluting stents has not been fully studied in very elderly patients who have clinical features that predispose them to side effects and long-term adverse events.

METHODS

The safety and efficacy of drug-eluting stents were studied in a historical cohort of consecutive octogenarian patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention.

RESULTS

Between 2002 and 2006, 176 octogenarian patients were treated using coronary stents: 90 with drug-eluting stents and 86 with bare-metal stents only. Patients treated using drug-eluting stents had a greater number of diseased vessels (2.28+/-0.85 vs. 1.87+/-0.87; P=.002), had more vessels treated (1.74+/-0.79 vs. 1.17+/-0.47; P< .0005), were more likely to have multivessel disease (79% vs. 59%; P=.005) and to undergo left main coronary artery treatment (20% vs. 1.0%; P< .0005), and had longer (26.6+/-6.7 mm vs. 16.6+/-4.9 mm; P< .0005) and smaller diameter (2.91+/-0.4 mm vs. 3.04+/-0.4 mm; P=.049) lesions. The median follow-up period was 26.3+/-12.9 months (in 98.3% of patients). After adjustment for other variables and for the likelihood of receiving a drug-eluting stent (i.e., the propensity score), there was no significant relationship between the type of coronary stent used and either mortality or the occurrence of adverse clinical events at 1 year of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

With careful clinical selection of patients, the use of drug-eluting stents in octogenarians with highly unfavorable angiographic characteristics can be as safe and effective as conventional stents for treating low-risk coronary lesions.

Drug-eluting stents in octogenarians: early and intermediate outcome

BACKGROUND

Large randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that percutaneous coronary intervention with the routine use of drug-eluting stents is safe and effective. However, octogenarians are usually excluded from these trials.

METHODS

We analyzed 2453 consecutive patients who underwent DES implantation at the Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN). The patients were classified in 2 age groups: patients > or = 80 years of age < or = 79 years of age.

RESULTS

Patients > or = 80 years old had significantly more adverse baseline characteristics including more comorbid conditions and more severe extensive coronary artery disease. Procedural success was high irrespective of the age group--97% in patients > or = 80 years of age versus 98% in the younger patients. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that age of > or = 80 years was significantly associated with inhospital major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) (P = .004). In addition, among inhospital survivors, octogenarians also had higher follow-up MACE rates (P < .001). At 12 months of follow-up, patients > or = 80 years of age had a mortality of 8.9% versus 3.0% for the younger patients (P < .001). The older patients also had more recurrent myocardial infarction (5.2% vs 2.6%, P = .019). However, there was no significant difference in 12-month target lesion revascularization (4.5% vs 4.9% [> or = 80 years of age vs < or = 79 years of age]) or coronary artery bypass grafting (1.8% vs 1.3% [> or = 80 years of age vs < or = 79 years of age]). After age-sex adjustment, life expectancy of octogenarians was similar to that of the general population (P = .78).

CONCLUSION

This study showed that drug-eluting stent implantation in octogenarians has high initial procedural success rates compared with the younger patients despite having more severe baseline risk characteristics. During follow-up, death and overall MACE rates remain higher in octogenarians but target lesion revascularization rates are similar.

Outcome in the elderly undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with sirolimus-eluting stents: results from the prospective multicenter German Cypher Stent Registry

BACKGROUND

Patients older than 75 years undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions are at increased risk for major adverse cardiac events strongly influenced by comorbidities. In various randomized trials, sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation has been shown to decrease the incidence of in-stent restenosis and to reduce repeat revascularization regardless of patient age.

METHODS

The present study evaluates the outcome after SES implantation in 954 patients older than 75 years compared with 5801 patients younger than 75 years enrolled in the German Cypher Registry in a routine clinical setting.

RESULTS

The elderly were at higher risk regarding renal failure, diabetes, hypertension, impaired left ventricular function, and 3-vessel disease. The SES implantation resulted in an impressive relief of angina. As expected, in-hospital and 6-month mortality rates were higher in the elderly. However, there was no difference with respect to the rate of major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization) at 6-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Nonfatal complications such as myocardial infarction or repeat target vessel revascularization did not increase with age, even taking patients older than 80 years into account.

Is there delayed restenosis in patients with coronary artery disease treated with sirolimus-eluting stent?

BACKGROUND

Although long-term follow-up after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation shows a sustained clinical benefit in several randomized and registered trials, little is known about the pattern of neointimal growth beyond the first 6 to 9 months. In this study, we therefore evaluated the possible delayed restenosis in patients with coronary artery disease treated with sirolimus-eluting stent.

METHODS

A total of consecutive 333 patients with 453 lesions were enrolled in this study (among 782 consecutive patients with 1023 lesions). Lesions were subjected to follow-up by quantitative coronary angiography, and patients were divided into two groups according to the time of follow-up by quantitative coronary angiography: early group (< or =270 days, n=270 with 369 lesions) and late group (>270 days, n=63 with 84 lesions). Binary restenosis was defined as stenosis of more than 50% of the lumen diameter in the target lesion.

RESULTS

Baseline clinical, demographic or angiographic characteristics were well balanced between the two groups. The in-stent restenosis rate was not significant between the early group and the late group (3.5 vs. 6.0%; P>0.05). The late loss and target lesion revascularization appeared higher in late group but there were no significant differences (0.15+/-0.38 mm vs. 0.24+/-0.44 mm; and 4.9 vs. 9.5%, P>0.05, respectively). Similarly, overall thrombosis rate was also same in both groups. In-segment restenosis was, however, higher in late group compared with that in early group (7.9 vs. 16.7%, P=0.013).

CONCLUSION

In this unrestricted population, the beneficial effects of sirolimus-eluting stent implantation extend out more than 1 year in real world practice, that has been confirmed by the results of the large randomized clinical trials. The late in-segment restenosis could, however, be found, suggesting that a prolonged clinical and angiographic surveillance in this subset of patients seems to be warranted.

Benefits on coronary restenosis from elective paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation in patients aged 75 years and older

OBJECTIVE

Elderly patients are increasingly referred for revascularisation yet have been underrepresented in some large clinical trials. Although the advent of drug-eluting stents has dramatically reduced clinical events related to restenosis, older age remains one of the most important correlates of adverse outcome, even after an elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We sought to evaluate the impact of paclitaxel-eluting stents on coronary restenosis in elderly patients undergoing elective PCI.

METHODS

Patients undergoing successful elective PCI with stenting of de novo coronary artery lesions were identified and screened for participation in this study. All patients included in our analysis were divided into two cohort groups: patients aged <75 years (younger cohort) and patients aged >or=75 years (elderly cohort). We evaluated the six-month incidence of target lesion revascularisation (TLR) and major adverse cardiac events, which included TLR, death and myocardial infarction.

RESULTS

A total of 171 (58 aged >or=75 years) consecutive patients were enrolled in the study. At six months, TLR rate was similar in both groups [1.77 vs. 1.72%, odds ratio (OR) 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08-10.9, P = 0.98, in the younger and elderly group, respectively]. Even the rate of major adverse cardiac events was comparable between the two groups (7.96 vs. 8.62%, OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.34-3.41, P = 0.88, in the younger and elderly group, respectively). Also the angiographic restenosis rates were comparable between patients <75 or >or=75 years (4.42 vs. 3.46%, P = 0.76).

CONCLUSIONS

After elective paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation, there is no difference in coronary restenosis in younger and elderly patients, suggesting an age-independent efficacy.

"Do Least Harm" Philosophy May Suffice for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Octogenarians

BACKGROUND

Octogenarians represent one of the most rapidly expanding segments of the population and an ever growing number are undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). A simplified approach with incomplete or "culprit-lesion" only PCI may be an option even in multivessel disease, to minimize periprocedural complications while still allowing a meaningful clinical recovery in patients with inherent functional limitations related to age itself. We tried to determine the effects of either complete or partial PCI on procedural and long-term outcome in a consecutive series of octogenarians.

METHODS

In-hospital and 1-year clinical outcomes were collected in elderly patients treated with PCI between January 1998 and March 2004 in our institution.

RESULTS

In a total of 165 octogenarians, 73 elderly patients (44%) underwent complete (COM) and 92 (56%) incomplete (INC) revascularization. Major in-hospital cardiac events were similar in the two subgroups. At 1-year follow-up 65% of patients in the COM and 68% in the INC group (P = ns) referred improvement in angina status and quality of life. Clinically driven repeat PCI was necessary in 16% of COM and 15% of INC patients. Recurrent PCI was mostly required to treat a restenotic index lesion in both groups, while only five patients in the INC group (5.4%) required PCI of a different lesion.

CONCLUSIONS

Current PCI coronary techniques are safe and effective in octogenarians. Restenosis remains the main cause for recurrent events after bare metal stents. Percutaneous revascularization limited to the culprit lesion may suffice in most patients, with favorable clinical outcome at 1 year.

Percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents in octogenarians: Characteristics, clinical presentation, and outcomes

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to compare clinical outcomes of octogenarians > or =80 years of age after coronary drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation.

BACKGROUND

Although octogenarians constitute a fast-growing portion of cardiovascular patients, they are not adequately represented in current clinical revascularization trials.

METHODS

We analyzed the data of 3,166 consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and DES implantation since March 2003. Periprocedural events, 1- and 6-month clinical outcomes were compared between octogenarians (n = 339) and patients <80 years of age (n = 2,827).

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics revealed a higher prevalence of females (P < 0.001), Caucasians (P = 0.004), chronic renal failure (P < 0.001), heart failure (P < 0.001), number of diseased vessels (P = 0.009), and lower ejection fraction (P = 0.03) in octogenarians. Patients <80 years showed more positive family history (P < 0.001), hyperlipidemia (P = 0.006), smoking (P < 0.001), and obesity (P < 0.001). Clinical presentation and procedural success were similar in both groups as were death, myocardial infarction (MI), and repeat revascularization in-hospital. At 6 months, restenosis rates were low and comparable. In the subgroup of octogenarians who presented with acute coronary syndrome, mortality (15% vs. 3%, P < 0.001) and Q-wave MI occurred more often. Multivariate analysis revealed age >80 (P = 0.008), cardiogenic shock (P < 0.001), Q-wave MI at presentation (P = 0.003), and length of hospital stay (P = 0.003) to be independent predictors of mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

PCI with DES in octogenarians results in a similar reduction of restenosis rates when compared to patients <80 years. Yet in octogenarians who presented with acute coronary syndrome, incidence of mortality and Q-wave MI at 6 months was higher as compared to younger patients.