Comparison of dobutamine stress echocardiography with and without real-time perfusion imaging for detection of coronary artery disease

Prospective randomized comparison of conventional stress echocardiography and real-time perfusion stress echocardiography in detecting significant coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

Although retrospective studies have suggested that myocardial perfusion and wall motion analysis with real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography (RTMCE) improves the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD) during dobutamine or exercise stress echocardiography, a prospective randomized comparison with conventional stress echocardiography that did not use RTMCE has not been performed.

METHODS

A total of 1,776 patients with preserved resting left ventricular wall motion undergoing dobutamine or exercise stress echocardiography for suspicion of CAD were randomized to either non-RTMCE, for which contrast was used only for the approved indication of enhancing left ventricular opacification, or RTMCE, for which contrast infusion was used in all cases to examine both wall motion and myocardial perfusion. Comparisons in test positivity, and positive predictive value in those subsequently referred for quantitative coronary angiography, were performed.

RESULTS

Patients randomized to RTMCE had significantly higher test positivity (22% for RTMCE vs 15% with non-RTMCE, P = .0002). The increased test positivity occurred without a difference in positive predictive value in predicting >50% diameter stenoses by quantitative coronary angiography (67% for non-RTMCE, 73% for RTMCE). The mechanism for increased detection of CAD with RTMCE was mostly due to the detection of subendocardial wall thickening abnormalities that would have gone undetected when examining transmural wall thickening.

CONCLUSIONS

RTMCE improves the detection of CAD during dobutamine and exercise stress echocardiography, mainly by the detection of subendocardial ischemia.

Rapid Detection of Coronary Artery Stenoses With Real-Time Perfusion Echocardiography During Regadenoson Stress

Background—

Real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography permits the detection of myocardial perfusion abnormalities during stress echocardiography, which may improve the accuracy of the test in detecting coronary artery stenoses. We hypothesized that this technique could be used after a bolus injection of the selective A2A receptor agonist regadenoson to rapidly and safely detect coronary artery stenoses.

Methods and Results—

In 100 patients referred for quantitative coronary angiography, real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography was performed during a continuous intravenous infusion of 3% Definity at baseline and at 2-minute intervals for up to 6 minutes after a regadenoson bolus injection (400 μg). Myocardial perfusion was assessed by examination of myocardial contrast replenishment after brief high mechanical index impulses. A perfusion defect was defined as a delay (>2 seconds) in myocardial contrast replenishment in 2 contiguous segments. Wall motion was also analyzed. The overall sensitivity/specificity/accuracy for myocardial perfusion analysis in detecting a >50% diameter stenosis was 80%/74%/78%, whereas for wall motion analysis it was 60%/72%/66% ( P <0.001 for differences in sensitivity). Sensitivity for myocardial perfusion analysis was highest on images obtained during the first 2 minutes after regadenoson bolus ( P <0.001 compared with wall motion), whereas wall motion sensitivity was highest at the 4-to-6–minute period after the bolus. No significant side effects occurred after regadenoson bolus injection.

Conclusions—

Regadenoson real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography appears to be a feasible, safe, and rapid noninvasive method for the detection of significant coronary artery stenoses.

Clinical Trial Registration—

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT0087369.

Personalized echocardiography: clinical applications of advanced echocardiography and future directions

Future cardiology practice will be increasingly individualized, and thus to maintain its central role, echocardiography must keep pushing to expand the boundaries of real-time data acquisition from tissue and fluid motion, and yet still provide efficient and timely data analysis that leads to succinct, clear clinical recommendations tailored to each person in our care. In this article, recent efforts to expand echocardiography techniques into an era of increasingly personalized cardiology, including advances in color-coded tissue Doppler, 3D echocardiography and complex exercise stress echocardiography are described. The common metric for success in each of these efforts is the development of robust and institutionally supportable echocardiography protocols for specific cardiology disease populations that currently may be underdiagnosed and/or undertreated. The common result in each case should be the creation of new guidelines that can supplement the current standard protocols advocated by professional echocardiography organizations.

Myocardial perfusion imaging with contrast ultrasound

This report reviews the development and clinical application of myocardial perfusion imaging with myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE). This includes the development of microbubble formulations that permit the detection of left ventricular contrast from venous injection and the imaging techniques that have been invented to detect the transit of these microbubbles through the microcirculation. The methods used to quantify myocardial perfusion during a continuous infusion of microbubbles are described. A review of the clinical studies that have examined the clinical utility of myocardial perfusion imaging with MCE during rest and stress echocardiography is then presented. The limitations of MCE are also discussed.

Factors affecting sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic testing: dobutamine stress echocardiography

BACKGROUND

Clinical characteristics of patients, angiographic referral bias, and several technical factors may all affect the reported diagnostic accuracy of tests. The aim of this study was to assess their influence on the diagnostic accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE).

METHODS

The medical literature from 1991 to 2006 was searched for diagnostic studies using DSE and meta-analysis was applied to the 62 studies thus retrieved, including 6881 patients. These studies were analyzed for patient characteristics, angiographic referral bias, and several technical factors.

RESULTS

The sensitivity of DSE was significantly related to the inclusion of patients with prior myocardial infarctions (0.834 vs 0.740, P < .01) and defining the results of DSE as already positive in case of resting wall motion abnormalities rather than obligatory myocardial ischemia (0.786 vs 0.864, P < .01). Specificity tended to be lower when patients with resting wall motion abnormalities were included in a study (0.812 vs 0.877, P < .10). The presence of referral bias adversely affected the specificity of DSE (0.771 vs 0.842, P < .01).

CONCLUSION

This analysis suggests that the reported sensitivity of DSE is likely higher and the specificity lower than expected in routine clinical practice because of the inappropriate inclusion of patients with prior myocardial infarctions, the definition of positive results on DSE, and the negative influence of referral bias. However, in the patient subset that will be sent to coronary angiography, the opposite results can be expected.

Effect on quality of life of different accelerated diagnostic protocols for management of patients presenting to the emergency department with acute chest pain

This study assessed the effects on quality of life (QoL) of dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography (DASE) and electrocardiogram exercise testing (EET) accelerated diagnostic protocols for early stratification of low-risk patients with acute chest pain (ACP). A total of 290 patients with ACP, a nondiagnostic electrocardiogram, and negative biomarkers were randomly assigned to an accelerated diagnostic protocol (DASE, n = 110, or EET, n = 89) or usual care (n = 91) and followed up for 2 months. QoL was assessed at discharge and 2-month follow-up using the Nottingham Health Profile questionnaire. Baseline and 2-month follow-up answers to the Nottingham Health Profile questionnaire were available for 207 patients (71%; 55 in the usual-care, 77 in the DASE, and 75 in the ETT arm). At predischarge, patients in the usual-care arm reported higher impairment in the physical mobility and pain dimensions compared with the DASE and EET arms (p = 0.019 and p = 0.023, respectively). At 2-month follow-up, QoL improved in all groups; however, patients in the usual-care arm had significantly worse scores than patients managed using accelerated diagnostic protocols in the physical mobility, pain, social isolation, emotional reactions, and energy level dimensions (p = 0.014, p = 0.002, p = 0.04, p = 0.01, and p = 0.003, respectively). In conclusion, low-risk patients with ACP had non-negligible impairment of QoL in the acute phase. Emergency department ADPs with early DASE and EET reduced QoL impairment at both baseline and 2-month follow-up.

Accelerated stress real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography for the detection of coronary artery disease: comparison with 99mTc single photon emission computed tomography

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this prospective study were to compare the diagnostic value of accelerated vasodilator stress real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) against coronary angiography and to evaluate whether the addition of MCE perfusion data improves the diagnostic accuracy of stress echocardiography.

METHODS

A total of 103 patients with suspected or known stable coronary artery disease (CAD) underwent SPECT and accelerated high-dose dipyridamole (0.84 mg/kg intravenously for 4 minutes) atropine (up to 1 mg intravenously) stress real-time qualitative MCE. The presence of CAD was detected by coronary angiography.

RESULTS

CAD defined as >or= 70% stenosis was detected in 77% of patients, whereas 86% of patients had CAD defined as >or= 50% stenosis. In a territory-by-territory analysis, the concordance between MCE and SPECT in detecting perfusion defects varied from 72.8% (kappa = 0.386) to 89.3% (kappa = 0.642). There were no significant differences between MCE and SPECT in sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy for identifying patients with CAD. Combining MCE and wall motion abnormality analysis significantly improved the sensitivity of the test compared with wall motion abnormality analysis alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Accelerated vasodilator stress real-time MCE yields a good concordance with SPECT in detection of perfusion defects and a similar diagnostic value for the detection of CAD. The addition of MCE perfusion data improves the diagnostic value of stress echocardiography.

Contrast echocardiography: evidence for clinical use

The failure of echocardiography to give diagnostically useful information in a significant proportion of patients has led to the development of specific contrast agents to enhance imaging. Suitable contrast media must have the ability to modify ultrasound characteristics, be capable of crossing the pulmonary capillary bed, show stability over the duration of a procedure, offer low blood solubility with low toxicity and be rapidly eliminated. The current generation of ultrasound contrast agents comprises microbubbles of a high molecular-weight gas encapsulated in a shell of phospholipid or protein. A review of the clinical evidence shows that these agents are clinically effective in enhancing echocardiographic imaging. They enable the rescue of failed procedures, often sparing patients from invasive tests, but appear not to add to the burden of side effects. Indeed, the benefits of using contrast agents in stress echocardiography have been recommended in recently published American Society of Echocardiography guidelines. Myocardial contrast echocardiography has now developed to the stage where assessment of myocardial perfusion for the detection of coronary artery disease is possible with the same diagnostic accuracy as radionuclide imaging. However, in comparison with the latter technique, it is less expensive, is more portable, and avoids the use of ionizing radiation. It is precisely the ability of myocardial contrast echocardiography to simultaneously assess function and perfusion at the bedside that has given it a unique role in clinical practice. This review provides an overview of the clinical evidence supporting the efficacy of contrast echocardiography in the assessment of myocardial structure, function, and perfusion.

Comparison of early dobutamine stress echocardiography and exercise electrocardiographic testing for management of patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain

This study compared the cost-effectiveness of dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography (DASE) and electrocardiographic exercise testing (EET) implemented in emergency department accelerated diagnostic protocols for the early stratification of low-risk patients presenting with acute chest pain (ACP). One hundred ninety-nine patients with ACP, nondiagnostic electrocardiographic results, and negative biomarker results were randomized to DASE (n = 110) or EET (n = 89) <6 hours after emergency department presentation. Patients with negative risk assessment results were immediately discharged and followed for 2 months. Ninety patients (82%) in the DASE arm and 78 (88%) in the EET arm were discharged after the diagnosis of nonischemic ACP. The mean lengths of stay in the hospital were 23 +/- 12 and 31 +/- 23 hours in the DASE and EET arms, respectively (p = 0.01). No 2-month follow-up events occurred in DASE patients, and the event rate was significantly higher in EET patients (0% vs 11%, p = 0.004). The DASE strategy showed lower costs compared with the EET strategy at 1-month ($1,026 +/- $250 vs $1,329 +/- $1,288, p = 0.03) and 2-month ($1,029 +/- 253 vs $1,684 +/- $2,149, p = 0.005) follow-up. In conclusion, early DASE in emergency department triage of low-risk patients with ACP is safe and reduces costs of care compared to EET.

Emerging cardiovascular imaging techniques to non-invasively detect coronary artery disease

The current reference standard for the non-invasive detection of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients who present with symptoms suggestive of CAD is either an exercise or pharmacologic stress radionuclide examination. Although useful, this test is limited by its relatively poor spatial resolution, high cost and need for ionizing radiation. Alternative non-invasive tests that are now clinically available include rest or pharmacologic stress echocardiography, pharmacologic stress during magnetic resonance perfusion imaging and multislice computed tomographic coronary angiography. This paper will present the advantages and disadvantages of stress techniques, and new developments that will further improve the accuracy of these tests.

Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography Evolving as a Clinically Feasible Technique for Accurate, Rapid, and Safe Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion

Intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) is a recently developed technique for assessment of myocardial perfusion. Up to now, many studies have demonstrated that the sensitivity and specificity of qualitative assessment of myocardial perfusion by MCE in patients with acute and chronic ischemic heart disease are comparable with other techniques such as cardiac scintigraphy and dobutamine stress echocardiography. Furthermore, quantitative parameters of myocardial perfusion derived from MCE correlate well with the current clinical standard for this purpose, positron emission tomography. Myocardial contrast echocardiography provides a promising and valuable tool for assessment of myocardial perfusion. Although MCE has been primarily performed for medical research, its implementation in routine clinical care is evolving. This article is intended to give an overview of the current status of MCE.

Assessment of myocardial perfusion with real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography: methodology and clinical applications

Real-time myocardial contrast perfusion imaging (RTMCI) with echocardiography is a promising technique for evaluation of patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. The technique is based on the utilization of small (<10 mum) microbubbles, which are capable of crossing the pulmonary circulation after intravenous injection. Unlike radioactive isotopes, which are taken actively or diffuse passively in the myocytes, myocardial contrast agents remain extracellularly in the capillaries and present a measure of the myocardial capillary blood volume and microvascular integrity. RTMCI has been shown to be a safe and feasible method for the assessment of myocardial perfusion at rest and with pharmacologic stress. Recent studies have shown the value of RTMCI with dobutamine stress in improving overall and regional detection of coronary artery disease and detecting of abnormalities at submaximal stress, therefore improving sensitivity in patients who are unable to achieve the target heart rate. The advantages of the technique include the ability to assess perfusion at bedside in one setting, simultaneous assessment of myocardial function, shorter imaging time, no need for ionizing irradiation, immediate availability of the results, and the ability to determine the ischemic threshold. Recent studies have shown that RTMCI improves the prognostic utility of standard dobutamine stress in addition to wall motion analysis. Patients with normal perfusion had a better outcome than those with normal wall motion. The combination of abnormal wall motion and perfusion identified patients at greatest risk of death and nonfatal myocardial infarction. Perfusion abnormalities were also shown to predict short-term cardiac events in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain and no ST-segment elevation. Refinement of imaging techniques is expected to improve the specificity of RTMCI, particularly in differentiating true perfusion defects from artifacts. This review will discuss the physiologic basis, methodology, clinical utility, and limitations of RTMCI in the assessment of patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.