Comparison of efficacy and safety of lower-dose to higher-dose oral prednisone after percutaneous coronary interventions (the IMPRESS-LD study)

Modulation of 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase as a strategy to reduce vascular inflammation

Atherosclerosis is a chronic inflammatory disease in which initial vascular damage leads to extensive macrophage and lymphocyte infiltration. Although acutely glucocorticoids suppress inflammation, chronic glucocorticoid excess worsens atherosclerosis, possibly by exacerbating systemic cardiovascular risk factors. However, glucocorticoid action within the lesion may reduce neointimal proliferation and inflammation. Glucocorticoid levels within cells do not necessarily reflect circulating levels due to pre-receptor metabolism by 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases (11β-HSDs). 11β-HSD2 converts active glucocorticoids into inert 11-keto forms. 11β-HSD1 catalyses the reverse reaction, regenerating active glucocorticoids. 11β-HSD2-deficiency/inhibition causes hypertension, whereas deficiency/inhibition of 11β-HSD1 generates a cardioprotective lipid profile and improves glycemic control. Importantly, 11β-HSD1-deficiency/inhibition is atheroprotective, whereas 11β-HSD2-deficiency accelerates atherosclerosis. These effects are largely independent of systemic risk factors, reflecting modulation of glucocorticoid action and inflammation within the vasculature. Here, we consider whether evidence linking the 11β-HSDs to vascular inflammation suggests these isozymes are potential therapeutic targets in vascular injury and atherosclerosis.

Prednisolone as preservation additive prevents from ischemia reperfusion injury in a rat model of orthotopic lung transplantation

The lung is, more than other solid organs, susceptible for ischemia reperfusion injury after orthotopic transplantation. Corticosteroids are known to potently suppress pro-inflammatory processes when given in the post-operative setting or during rejection episodes. Whereas their use has been approved for these clinical indications, there is no study investigating its potential as a preservation additive in preventing vascular damage already in the phase of ischemia. To investigate these effects we performed orthotopic lung transplantations (LTX) in the rat. Prednisolone was either added to the perfusion solution for lung preservation or omitted and rats were followed for 48 hours after LTX. Prednisolone preconditioning significantly increased survival and diminished reperfusion edema. Hypoxia induced vasoactive cytokines such as VEGF were reduced. Markers of leukocyte invasiveness like matrix metalloprotease (MMP)-2, or common pro-inflammatory molecules like the CXCR4 receptor or the chemokine (C-C motif) ligand (CCL)-2 were downregulated by prednisolone. Neutrophil recruitment to the grafts was only increased in Perfadex treated lungs. Together with this, prednisolone treated animals displayed significantly reduced lung protein levels of neutrophil chemoattractants like CINC-1, CINC-2α/β and LIX and upregulated tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase (TIMP)-1. Interestingly, lung macrophage invasion was increased in both, Perfadex and prednisolone treated grafts, as measured by MMP-12 or RM4. Markers of anti-inflammatory macrophage transdifferentiation like MRC-1, IL-13, IL-4 and CD163, significantly correlated with prednisolone treatment. These observations lead to the conclusion that prednisolone as an additive to the perfusion solution protects from hypoxia triggered danger signals already in the phase of ischemia and thus reduces graft edema in the phase of reperfusion. Additionally, prednisolone preconditioning might also lead to macrophage polarization as a beneficial long-term effect.

Immunosuppressive therapy with oral prednisone to prevent restenosis after PCI. A multicenter randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Prednisone at immunosuppressive doses after stenting has shown remarkable efficacy in reducing ischemic recurrences in nondiabetic patients with high post-procedural levels of C-reactive protein; the study aim was to compare the clinical outcome obtained in a control group of patients treated with bare metal stents versus 2 other study groups--bare metal stent plus oral prednisone or drug eluting stents--assuming similar optimal adjunctive medical treatment.

METHODS

Five tertiary Italian hospitals enrolled 375 nondiabetic patients with coronary artery disease and no contraindications to dual antiplatelet treatment or corticosteroid therapy in a randomized, controlled study performed between 2007 and 2009. Patients were allocated into 3 study groups: bare metal stents (controls), bare metal stents followed by a 40-day prednisone treatment, or drug-eluting stents. The primary endpoint was the event-free survival of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and recurrence of ischemia needing repeated target vessel revascularization at 1 year as adjudicated by an independent clinical events committee.

RESULTS

One-year follow-up was obtained in all patients. Patients receiving bare metal stents alone as compared to those treated with prednisone or drug-eluting stents had lower event-free survival; the primary endpoint was 80.8% in controls compared to 88.0% in the prednisone and 88.8% in the drug-eluting stent groups, respectively (P=.04 and .006).

CONCLUSION

Compared with bare metal stents alone, prednisone treatment after bare metal stents or drug-eluting stent implantation result in a better event-free survival at 1 year.

The evolving role of inflammatory biomarkers in risk assessment after stent implantation

The main adverse reactions to coronary stents are in-stent restenosis (ISR) and stent thrombosis. Along with procedural factors, individual susceptibility to these events plays an important role. In particular, inflammatory status, as assessed by C-reactive protein levels, predicts the risk of ISR after bare-metal stent implantation, although it does not predict the risk of stent thrombosis. Conversely, C-reactive protein levels fail to predict the risk of ISR after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation, although they appear to predict the risk of stent thrombosis. Of note, DES have abated ISR rates occurring in the classical 1-year window, but new concern is emerging regarding late restenosis and thrombosis. The pathogenesis of these late events seems to be related to delayed healing and allergic reactions to polymers, a process in which eosinophils seem to play an important role by enhancing restenosis and thrombosis. The identification of high-risk individuals based on biomarker assessment may be important for the management of patients receiving stent implantation. In this report, we review the evolving role of inflammatory biomarkers in predicting the risk of ISR and stent thrombosis.

Predictive value of C-reactive protein after drug-eluting stent implantation

During the last few decades, with the evolution of techniques and materials and the increasing experience of operators, percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) have become an equally efficient alternative to coronary artery bypass grafts for the treatment of most coronary stenoses. Bare-metal stent implantation represented a major step forward, compared with plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA), by improving the immediate angiographic success. However, the incidence of in-stent restenosis (ISR) remained unacceptably high. Development of the drug-eluting stent (DES) significantly improved the outcome of PCI by dramatically abating the rate of ISR and reducing the incidence of target lesion revascularization. However, ISR has not been eliminated and the persistence of metal vessel scaffolding also raises concern regarding the occurrence of late or very late stent thrombosis. POBA and stent implantation have been shown to induce a local and systemic inflammatory response, whose magnitude is associated with worse clinical outcome, and they increase the risk of ISR. C-reactive protein, a marker of systemic inflammation, has been demonstrated to predict clinical and angiographic outcome after POBA or bare-metal stent implantation. However, conflicting data regarding the prognostic value of C-reactive protein following DES implantation are available. In this paper, we review the literature regarding the clinical and pathophysiological association between inflammation and prognosis after DES implantation and suggest some possible therapeutic approaches to reduce inflammatory burden with the aim to improve clinical and angiographic outcome after PCI.

Therapeutic manipulation of glucocorticoid metabolism in cardiovascular disease

The therapeutic potential for manipulation of glucocorticoid metabolism in cardiovascular disease was revolutionized by the recognition that access of glucocorticoids to their receptors is regulated in a tissue-specific manner by the isozymes of 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase. Selective inhibitors of 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 have been shown recently to ameliorate cardiovascular risk factors and inhibit the development of atherosclerosis. This article addresses the possibility that inhibition of 11beta-hydroxsteroid dehydrogenase type 1 activity in cells of the cardiovascular system contributes to this beneficial action. The link between glucocorticoids and cardiovascular disease is complex as glucocorticoid excess is linked with increased cardiovascular events but glucocorticoid administration can reduce atherogenesis and restenosis in animal models. There is considerable evidence that glucocorticoids can interact directly with cells of the cardiovascular system to alter their function and structure and the inflammatory response to injury. These actions may be regulated by glucocorticoid and/or mineralocorticoid receptors but are also dependent on the 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases which may be expressed in cardiac, vascular (endothelial, smooth muscle) and inflammatory (macrophages, neutrophils) cells. The activity of 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases in these cells is dependent upon differentiation state, the action of pro-inflammaotory cytokines and the influence of endogenous inhibitors (oxysterols, bile acids). Further investigations are required to clarify the link between glucocorticoid excess and cardiovascular events and to determine the mechanism through which glucocorticoid treatment inhibits atherosclerosis/restenosis. This will provide greater insights into the potential benefit of selective 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase inhibitors in treatment of cardiovascular disease.

Avoiding restenosis: is there a role for glucocorticoids in the drug-eluting stent era?

Restenosis is an important limitation of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). In-stent restenosis is mainly due to neointimal hyperplasia, a proliferative process modulated by inflammatory mechanisms. Numerous technical and pharmacological means have been tested to reduce restenosis rates, with frequently disappointing clinical results. Drug-eluting stents (DES) have demonstrated a high efficacy in reducing restenosis, but there are some associated problems that limit its generalized utilization. Glucocorticoids (GC), as potent anti-inflammatory agents, may exert beneficial effects on neointimal proliferation. Clinical studies with oral and intracoronary GC therapy have demonstrated reduction in restenosis rates in selected patients. Although further investigations are warranted, GC might have a potential role for restenosis prevention in selected cases.

Glucocorticoids and cardiovascular disease

Chronic excessive activation of glucocorticoid receptors induces obesity, insulin resistance, glucose intolerance, dyslipidaemia and hypertension. Subtle abnormalities of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and/or of tissue sensitivity to glucocorticoids are also associated with these cardiovascular risk factors in patients with the metabolic syndrome. Furthermore, glucocorticoids have direct effects on the heart and blood vessels, mediated by both glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid receptors and modified by local metabolism of glucocorticoids by the 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase enzymes. These effects influence vascular function, atherogenesis and vascular remodelling following intra-vascular injury or ischaemia. This article reviews the systemic and cardiovascular effects of glucocorticoids, and the evidence that glucocorticoids not only promote the incidence and progression of atherogenesis but also modify the recovery from occlusive vascular events and intravascular injury. The conclusion is that manipulation of glucocorticoid action within metabolic and cardiovascular tissues may provide novel therapeutic avenues to combat cardiovascular disease.

Glucocorticoids in the prevention of restenosis after coronary angioplasty: therapeutic potential

Vessel luminal narrowing after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is characterised by platelet aggregation, release of growth factors, inflammatory cell infiltration, medial smooth muscle cell (SMC) proliferation, proteoglycan deposition and extracellular matrix remodelling. It is broadly accepted that the central mechanism at the basis of the whole pathophysiological process of restenosis is inflammation, triggered by vascular injury and activated through autocrine or paracrine mediators. Glucocorticosteroids exert beneficial effects on platelet function, on SMC proliferation and on collagen synthesis as well as inflammatory cell migration and activation, thus interfering with several steps of the cascade leading to neointima formation and subsequent late lumen loss. Initial experiences with systemic administration of glucocorticoids after PCI failed to confirm the expected benefits of this treatment, probably as a result of inadequate dosage and pharmacokinetic calculations. Recently a short-term, high-dose immunosuppressive treatment scheme with oral prednisone has demonstrated remarkable clinical and angiographic results when prednisone was given orally at a dose of 1 mg/kg for 10 days, 0.5 mg/kg for 20 days and 0.25 mg/kg for 15 days. This treatment has dramatically reduced the incidence of clinical vascular events at 1 year compared with controls (relative risk 0.34; 95% CI 0.12, 0.96; p = 0.006) and reduced the incidence of angiographic restenosis below 10% in different clinical and angiographic subsets. Secondary effects of a short course of glucocorticoids are generally minor, predictable and reversible: gastric pain, water and salt retention and worsened hypertension manifest in nearly 10% of patients. The addition of diuretics and acid suppressants before discharge, and the upgrading of antihypertensive medication thereafter, if needed, are useful preventive measures to control these temporary disorders. A routine blood cell count 4 weeks after PCI is advised in patients receiving thienopyridines (clopidogrel or ticlopidine) in addition to prednisone to rule out infrequent haematological dyscrasias. Emerging evidence supports this strategy as a convenient and well tolerated alternative to more expensive and complex revascularisation procedures such as drug eluting stent (DES) implantation or cardiac surgery, provided that the treatment is reserved for carefully selected candidates, i.e. after the exclusion of those with diabetes mellitus, a recent transmural myocardial infarction, or contraindications to the administration of a short-course of high-dose glucocorticosteroids. The recent concerns regarding the long-term safety of first-generation DES and the as yet undetermined duration of dual anti-platelet treatment, further supports the need for a simple pharmacological treatment that can be applied in a large percentage of patients currently treated with PCI. Multicentre randomised studies aimed at defining the efficacy and safety of oral prednisone treatment compared with metallic stents and DES are ongoing, and will become available in upcoming years.