1
|
Donisan T, Madanat L, Balanescu DV, Mertens A, Dixon S. Drug-Eluting Stent Restenosis: Modern Approach to a Classic Challenge. Curr Cardiol Rev 2023; 19:e030123212355. [PMID: 36597603 PMCID: PMC10280993 DOI: 10.2174/1573403x19666230103154638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Revised: 11/19/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
In-stent restenosis (ISR) is a recognized complication following percutaneous coronary intervention in which the luminal diameter is narrowed through neointimal hyperplasia and vessel remodeling. Although rates of ISR have decreased in most recent years owing to newer generation drug-eluting stents, thinner struts, and better intravascular imaging modalities, ISR remains a prevalent dilemma that proves to be challenging to manage. Several factors have been proposed to contribute to ISR formation, including mechanical stent characteristics, technical factors during the coronary intervention, and biological aspects of drug-eluting stents. Presentation of ISR can range from asymptomatic to late myocardial infarction and could be difficult to differentiate from acute thrombus formation. No definite guidelines are present on the management of ISR. In this review, we will discuss the mechanisms underlying ISR and provide insight into patient-related and procedural risk factors contributing to ISR, in addition to highlighting common treatment approaches utilized in the management of ISR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teodora Donisan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, 48073, USA
| | - Luai Madanat
- Department of Internal Medicine, Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, 48073, USA
| | - Dinu V. Balanescu
- Department of Internal Medicine, Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, 48073, USA
| | - Amy Mertens
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, 48073, USA
| | - Simon Dixon
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, 48073, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhu Y, Liu K, Kong X, Nan J, Gao A, Liu Y, Han H, Li H, Zhu H, Zhang J, Zhao Y. Comparison of Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty vs. Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for Drug-Eluting Stent Restenosis in the Routine Clinical Practice: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Front Cardiovasc Med 2021; 8:766088. [PMID: 34926617 PMCID: PMC8671700 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.766088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2021] [Accepted: 10/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: In-stent restenosis (ISR) remains a challenging issue despite the great advance of drug-eluting stents (DES). In addition, the consensus was lacking regarding the optimal strategy for DES-ISR. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate angiographic and clinical outcomes of the two most effective treatments DES vs. drug-eluting balloon (DCB) for patients with DES-ISR. Methods: This meta-analysis used the data from the randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which were identified by a systematic search in the databases of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Target lesion revascularization (TLR) was regarded as the primary endpoint. In addition, the late angiographic outcomes and other clinical outcomes, namely, cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization, stent thrombosis, and major adverse cardiac events, were also included for analysis. Results: Five RCTs with about 1,193 patients were included in this meta-analysis for the analysis. For the primary endpoint, the overall pooled outcomes suggested repeat DES implantation was associated with a significant reduction in the term of TLR compared with DCB angioplasty (risk ratio = 1.53, 95% CI 1.15-2.04, p = 0.003). But no significant difference in angiographic outcomes and other clinical endpoints were observed between DES and DCB. In the subgroup analysis, DCB was inferior to new-generation DES (NG-DES)/everolimus-eluting stent (EES) in the term of TLR. In addition, this non-significant trend was also noted in the subgroup of the paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) vs. DCB. For the angiographic endpoints, EES, not PES, was associated with larger minimum lumen diameter [mean difference (MD) = -0.25, 95% CI -0.38 to -0.11, p = 0.0003], lower percent diameter stenosis (MD = 7.29%, 95% CI 2.86-11.71%, p = 0.001), and less binary restenosis (OR = 2.20, 95% CI 1.18-4.11, p = 0.01). But NG-DES/EES was comparable to DCB in cardiac death, MI, and stent thrombosis. Conclusions: For the patients with DES-ISR, treatment with DES, especially NG-DES/EES could reduce the risk of TLR significantly compared to DCB at long-term follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Zhu
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Kesen Liu
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiangyun Kong
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Jing Nan
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Ang Gao
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yan Liu
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Hongya Han
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Hong Li
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Huagang Zhu
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Jianwei Zhang
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yingxin Zhao
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Impact of intravascular ultrasound on Outcomes following PErcutaneous coronary interventioN for In-stent Restenosis (iOPEN-ISR study). Int J Cardiol 2021; 340:17-21. [PMID: 34371029 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2020] [Revised: 07/30/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains common. Intravascular imaging allows for the determination of the mechanism of ISR, potentially guiding appropriate therapy. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided stent implantation is associated with a reduction in adverse events after PCI, but its impact on treatment of ISR is not clear. METHODS All patients with 1-year follow-up after ISR treatment from 2003 through 2016 were included and stratified by IVUS use. The primary endpoint was the rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 1 year, defined as the composite of all-cause mortality, Q-wave myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization (TVR). RESULTS The final analysis included 1522 ISR patients, 65.9% of whom were treated with IVUS guidance. The primary endpoint occurred in 18.0% of patients treated with IVUS guidance vs. 24.5% of patients treated with angiography guidance (p = 0.0014). Post-dilatation was used more often with IVUS (18.6% vs. 14.1%, p < 0.001), with a larger diameter of new stents (3.04 ± 0.35 mm vs. 2.94 ± 0.47 mm, p = 0.001). At 1 year, TVR occurred in 14.5% with IVUS guidance and 19.2% with angiography guidance (p = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS The use of IVUS is associated with decreased MACE at 1 year following PCI for ISR. These results support routine IVUS for the treatment of ISR lesions.
Collapse
|
4
|
Yang G, He H, Li H, Shen Z, Zhou S, Lu B, Li J, He Q, Zhang Z, Liu Y, Wang J, Chen H. Effects of Danlou tablet for the treatment of stable angina pectoris: A study protocol of a randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled clinical trial. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020; 99:e23416. [PMID: 33285733 PMCID: PMC7717752 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000023416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 10/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Stable angina pectoris has a high prevalence and causes serious harm. Revascularization therapy can relieve angina pectoris to some extent, but it is not widely accepted in China due to the cost and secondary events. The Chinese proprietary medicine Danlou tablet has been widely used to treat angina pectoris, but previous trials had inadequate methodologies. In this study, we aim to conduct a randomized controlled trial to evaluate its efficacy and safety on stable angina. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This study is a WeChat-based randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled clinical trial in China. Eligible participants are adults (aged 30-75 years) with CT-confirmed stable angina and traditional Chinese medicine-diagnosed intermingled phlegm and blood stasis syndrome. A total of 76 participants will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to the oral Danlou tablet group (1.5 mg a time, 3 times daily for 28 days) or the placebo group. Patients are permitted concomitant use of routine medications during these 28 days. The primary outcome is angina frequency per week. The secondary outcomes include angina severity, angina duration, traditional Chinese medicine efficacy, the withdrawal rate of emergency medications, blood lipids, and electrocardiograph efficacy. The WeChat app will be used to remind patients to take their medicines and fill out the forms. All data will be recorded in case report forms and analyzed by Statistical Analysis System software. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences in Beijing, China (No. 2019-225-KY). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: ChiCTR1900028068.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guang Yang
- Department of Cardiology, Guang’anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences
| | - Haoqiang He
- Department of Cardiology, Guang’anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences
- Graduate School, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Hongzheng Li
- Department of Cardiology, Guang’anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences
- Graduate School, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Zinuo Shen
- Department of Cardiology, Guang’anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences
- Graduate School, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Siyuan Zhou
- Department of Cardiology, Guang’anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences
| | - Bingxu Lu
- Department of Cardiology, Guang’anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences
- Graduate School, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Jun Li
- Department of Cardiology, Guang’anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences
| | - Qingyong He
- Department of Cardiology, Guang’anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences
| | - Zhenpeng Zhang
- Department of Cardiology, Guang’anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences
| | - Yongmei Liu
- Department of Cardiology, Guang’anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences
| | - Jie Wang
- Department of Cardiology, Guang’anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences
| | - Hengwen Chen
- Department of Cardiology, Guang’anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mitsutake Y, Konishi A, Shiba T, Ito T, Ho M, Shirato H. Differences in clinical outcomes between pre- and post-marketing clinical study following paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter treatment for coronary in-stent restenosis: from the Japanese regulatory viewpoint. Heart Vessels 2020; 36:155-162. [PMID: 32776235 DOI: 10.1007/s00380-020-01676-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 07/31/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
In 2013, a drug-coated balloon catheter (DCB) (SeQuent Please) for the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis (ISR) was approved in Japan. The pre-marketing Japan domestic NP001 study demonstrated better outcomes of the DCB (n = 138) compared to plain balloon angioplasty (n = 72). After the introduction to marketing, a post-marketing surveillance (PMS) (n = 396) was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the DCB in Japanese routine clinical practice. The aim of this paper was to assess differences between the pre-marketing NP001 study and the PMS. Compared to the NP001 study, more complex lesions were treated in the PMS (type B2/C: 69.0% vs 20.4%, total occlusion: 11.2% vs 0%, p < 0.001, respectively) and target lesion was more frequently ISR related to drug-eluting stent (DES) (79.5% vs 39.4%, p < 0.001). Regarding clinical outcomes, the rate of target lesion revascularization (TLR) was higher in the PMS than in the NP001 study (TLR: 12.9% at 7 months and 17.6% at 12 months vs 2.8% at 6 months, p = 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that DES-ISR was a risk factor of TLR after DCB treatment for ISR (odds ratio: 5.77, 95% CI 1.75-18.95, p = 0.004). Among representative published trials using DCB for ISR, clinical outcomes are often worse in DES-ISR trials than those in bare metal stent-ISR trials. The rates of TLR in previous DES-ISR trials are similar to that in the current PMS (TLR at 12 months: 22.1% for ISAR-DESIRE 3, 15.3% for PEPCAD-DES, and 13.0% for RIBS IV). The effectiveness and safety of DCB for coronary ISR have been confirmed in the Japanese real-world survey. PMS would be useful to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of medical products throughout their total life cycles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshiaki Mitsutake
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, 67 Asahi-machi, Kurume, 830-0011, Japan
| | - Akihide Konishi
- Clinical & Translational Research Center, Kobe University Hospital, 7-5-2 Kusunoki-machi, Chuo-ku, Kobe, 650-0017, Japan
| | - Takeshi Shiba
- Office of Medical Devices I, Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, 3-2-2 Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 100-0013, Japan.
| | - Takuya Ito
- Office of Medical Devices I, Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, 3-2-2 Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 100-0013, Japan
| | - Mami Ho
- Office of Medical Devices I, Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, 3-2-2 Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 100-0013, Japan
| | - Haruki Shirato
- Office of Medical Devices I, Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, 3-2-2 Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 100-0013, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Clinical Outcomes of Drug-Eluting versus Bare-Metal In-Stent Restenosis after the Treatment of Drug-Eluting Stent or Drug-Eluting Balloon: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Interv Cardiol 2020; 2020:8179849. [PMID: 32684867 PMCID: PMC7336236 DOI: 10.1155/2020/8179849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2019] [Accepted: 06/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Although drug-eluting stents (DES) have reduced the rates of in-stent restenosis (ISR) compared with bare-metal stents (BMS), DES related ISR (DES-ISR) still occurs and outcomes of DES-ISR remain unclear. The objective of this meta-analysis was to investigate the long-term clinical outcomes of patients with DES-ISR compared with patients with BMS related ISR (BMS-ISR) after the treatment of DES or drug-eluting balloon (DEB). Methods and results. We searched the literature in the main electronic databases including PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The primary endpoints were target lesion revascularization (TLR) and target vessel revascularization (TVR). The secondary endpoints included all cause death (ACD), cardiac death (CD), myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis or re-in-stent restenosis (ST/RE-ISR), and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). A total of 19 studies with 6256 participants were finally included in this meta-analysis. Results showed that the rates of TLR (P < 0.00001), TVR (P < 0.00001), CD (P=0.02), ST/RE-ISR (P < 0.00001), and MACEs (P < 0.00001) were significantly higher in the DES-ISR group than in the BMS-ISR group. No significant differences were found between the two groups in the rates of MI (P=0.05) and ACD (P=0.21). Conclusions Our study demonstrated that patients with DES-ISR had worse clinical outcomes at the long-term follow-up than patients with BMS-ISR after the treatment of DES or DEB, suggesting that DES and DEB may be more effective for BMS-ISR than that for DES-ISR. Positive prevention of DES-ISR is indispensable and further studies concentrating on detecting the predictors of outcomes of DES-ISR are required.
Collapse
|
7
|
Giacoppo D, Alfonso F, Xu B, Claessen BE, Adriaenssens T, Jensen C, Pérez-Vizcayno MJ, Kang DY, Degenhardt R, Pleva L, Baan J, Cuesta J, Park DW, Kukla P, Jiménez-Quevedo P, Unverdorben M, Gao R, Naber CK, Park SJ, Henriques JP, Kastrati A, Byrne RA. Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Versus Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation in Patients With Coronary Stent Restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020; 75:2664-2678. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2020] [Revised: 03/10/2020] [Accepted: 04/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
8
|
Combined Vascular Brachytherapy and Stenting for the Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis. Am J Cardiol 2020; 125:712-719. [PMID: 31889523 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.11.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2019] [Revised: 11/21/2019] [Accepted: 11/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
In-stent restenosis (ISR) remains a therapeutic challenge in the current drug-eluting stent (DES) era. Vascular brachytherapy (VBT) is a therapeutic option for ISR, but data about the outcomes of combination therapy with VBT and stenting for ISR lesions are sparse. We retrospectively analyzed patients who presented with ISR at our institution from 2003 through 2017. Three treatment arms were compared: VBT alone, VBT plus bare-metal stent (BMS), and VBT plus DES. Clinical, procedural, and 1-year outcome data were collected. Follow-up was obtained by phone calls and clinic visits. The patient cohort included 461 patients (764 ISR lesions). Of these, 333 patients (533 lesions) were treated with VBT alone, 89 patients (158 lesions) with VBT plus BMS, and 39 patients (73 lesions) with VBT plus DES. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics among the 3 groups except for more patients with a remote smoking history in the VBT plus BMS (43.8%) and VBT plus DES groups (56.4%), and more patients with history of peripheral vascular disease (39.5%) and congestive heart failure (27%) in the VBT plus DES group. The most common clinical presentation was unstable angina (64.6%). In the VBT plus DES group, 10.3% of patients presented with MI, versus 5.5% in the VBT alone group and 2.2% in the VBT plus BMS group. At 1-year follow-up, the VBT plus DES group had higher rates of target vessel revascularization-major adverse cardiovascular events (38.5%) than the VBT plus BMS (21.3%) and VBT alone (15.6%) groups (p = 0.002). In conclusion, in patients with ISR, combination therapy with VBT and stenting at the same setup is associated with worse outcomes at 12 months and, if possible, should be avoided.
Collapse
|
9
|
Megaly M, Glogoza M, Xenogiannis I, Vemmou E, Nikolakopoulos I, Willson L, Monyak DJ, Sullivan P, Stanberry L, Sorajja P, Chavez I, Mooney M, Traverse J, Wang Y, Garcia S, Poulose A, Burke MN, Brilakis ES. Outcomes of intravascular brachytherapy for recurrent drug-eluting in-stent restenosis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2020; 97:32-38. [PMID: 31943747 DOI: 10.1002/ccd.28716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2019] [Revised: 12/25/2019] [Accepted: 12/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine the outcomes of vascular brachytherapy (VBT) for recurrent drug-eluting stents (DES) in-stent restenosis (ISR). BACKGROUND Recurrent DES-ISR can be challenging to treat. VBT has been used with encouraging results. METHODS We report the long-term outcomes of patients with recurrent DES-ISR treated with VBT between January 2014 and September 2018 at a tertiary care institution. The main outcome was target lesion failure (TLF), defined as the composite of clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR), target lesion myocardial infarction (MI), and target lesion-related cardiac death. Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed to identify variables associated with recurrent TLF. RESULTS During the study period, 116 patients (143 lesions) underwent VBT. Median follow-up was 24.7 (14.5-35.4) months. The incidence of TLR, target-lesion MI, and TLF was 18.9%, 5.6%,and 20.1% at 1 year, and 29.4%, 10.5%, and 32.9% at 2 years.Initial presentation with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) was independently associated with TLF (hazard ratio = 1.975, 95% CI [1.120, 3.485], p = .019). Lesions treated with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance had a lower incidence of TLR (14.3% vs. 39.6%, log-rank p = .038), and a trend toward lower incidence of TLF (19% vs. 42.6%, log-rank p = .086). CONCLUSIONS VBT can improve the treatment of recurrent DES-ISR, but TLF occurs in approximately one in three patients at 2 years. Initial presentation with ACS was associated with higher TLF and the use of IVUS with a trend for lower incidence of TLF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Megaly
- Minneapolis Heart Institute, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota.,Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Hennepin Healthcare, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Matthew Glogoza
- Minneapolis Heart Institute, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Iosif Xenogiannis
- Minneapolis Heart Institute, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Evangelia Vemmou
- Minneapolis Heart Institute, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Ilias Nikolakopoulos
- Minneapolis Heart Institute, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Laura Willson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - David J Monyak
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Patsa Sullivan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Larissa Stanberry
- Minneapolis Heart Institute, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Paul Sorajja
- Minneapolis Heart Institute, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Ivan Chavez
- Minneapolis Heart Institute, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Michael Mooney
- Minneapolis Heart Institute, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Jay Traverse
- Minneapolis Heart Institute, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Yale Wang
- Minneapolis Heart Institute, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Santiago Garcia
- Minneapolis Heart Institute, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Anil Poulose
- Minneapolis Heart Institute, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | | | - Emmanouil S Brilakis
- Minneapolis Heart Institute, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
3-Year Clinical Follow-Up of the RIBS IV Clinical Trial: A Prospective Randomized Study of Drug-Eluting Balloons Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients With In-Stent Restenosis in Coronary Arteries Previously Treated With Drug-Eluting Stents. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2019; 11:981-991. [PMID: 29798776 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.02.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2018] [Revised: 02/20/2018] [Accepted: 02/28/2018] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study sought to compare the long-term safety and efficacy of drug-eluting balloons (DEB) and everolimus-eluting stents (EES) in patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) of drug-eluting stents (DES). BACKGROUND Treatment of patients with DES-ISR remains a challenge. METHODS The RIBS IV (Restenosis Intra-Stent of Drug-Eluting Stents: Drug-Eluting Balloons vs Everolimus-Eluting Stents) trial is a prospective multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing DEB and EES in patients with DES-ISR. The pre-specified comparison of the 3-year clinical outcomes obtained with these interventions is the main objective of the present study. RESULTS A total of 309 patients with DES-ISR were randomized to DEB (n = 154) or EES (n = 155). At angiographic follow-up, the in-segment minimal lumen diameter was larger in the EES arm (2.03 ± 0.7 mm vs. 1.80 ± 0.6 mm; p < 0.01). Three-year clinical follow-up was obtained in all enrolled patients (100%). The combined clinical outcome measure of cardiac death, myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularization was significantly reduced in the EES arm (19 [12.3%] vs. 31 [20.1%]; p = 0.04; hazard ratio: 0.57 [95% confidence interval: 0.34 to 0.96]), driven by a lower need for target lesion revascularization (11 [7.1%] vs. 24 [15.6%]; p = 0.015; hazard ratio: 0.43 [95% confidence interval: 0.21 to 0.87]). The need for "late" (>1 year) target lesion revascularization (2.6% vs. 4%) and target vessel revascularization (4% vs. 6.6%) was similar in the 2 arms. Rates of cardiac death (3.9% vs. 3.2%), myocardial infarction (2.6% vs. 4.5%), and stent thrombosis (1.3% vs. 2.6%) at 3 years were also similar in both arms. CONCLUSIONS The 3-year clinical follow-up of this randomized clinical trial demonstrates that in patients with DES-ISR, EES reduce the need for repeat interventions compared with DEB. (Restenosis Intra-Stent of Drug-Eluting Stents: Drug-Eluting Balloons vs Everolimus-Eluting Stents [RIBS IV]; NCT01239940).
Collapse
|
11
|
Varghese MJ, Bhatheja S, Baber U, Kezbor S, Chincholi A, Chamaria S, Buckstein M, Bakst R, Kini A, Sharma S. Intravascular Brachytherapy for the Management of Repeated Multimetal-Layered Drug-Eluting Coronary Stent Restenosis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2019; 11:e006832. [PMID: 30354630 DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.118.006832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Because of the widespread acceptance of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents as an effective treatment strategy for in-stent restenosis, it is common to encounter multimetal layer stent restenosis in the recent years. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of such patients treated with intravascular brachytherapy (IVBT) in comparison with other percutaneous options. METHODS AND RESULTS We enrolled patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention during the period between 2011 and 2015 for recurrent drug-eluting stents in-stent restenosis with at least 2 layers of stents at the lesion site. This analysis compared patients who underwent treatment with IVBT and those who did not (non-IVBT group). The primary end point measured was major adverse cardiac events defined as a composite of target lesion revascularization, myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality at 12 months. Adjusted associations were measured using propensity score matching. A total of 328 percutaneous coronary intervention patients met the eligibility criteria, of which 197 patients received IVBT, and 131 patients underwent routine percutaneous intervention. The primary end point was significantly lower in patients undergoing IVBT (13.2% and 28.2%; P=0.01). A propensity score matching for risk factors of in-stent restenosis identified 182 patients. The advantages of IVBT with regard to 1-year major adverse cardiac events were confirmed in this matched cohort (13.2% and 30.8%; adjusted hazard ratio [95% CI]: 0.37 [0.18-0.73]; P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS In this analysis, IVBT led to significantly lower major adverse cardiac events in patients with multilayered drug-eluting stents restenosis when compared with other percutaneous options at 1-year follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mithun J Varghese
- Division of Cardiology, Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory (M.J.V., S.B., U.B., S.K., A.C., S.C., A.K., S.S.), Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Samit Bhatheja
- Division of Cardiology, Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory (M.J.V., S.B., U.B., S.K., A.C., S.C., A.K., S.S.), Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Usman Baber
- Division of Cardiology, Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory (M.J.V., S.B., U.B., S.K., A.C., S.C., A.K., S.S.), Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Safwan Kezbor
- Division of Cardiology, Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory (M.J.V., S.B., U.B., S.K., A.C., S.C., A.K., S.S.), Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Aditi Chincholi
- Division of Cardiology, Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory (M.J.V., S.B., U.B., S.K., A.C., S.C., A.K., S.S.), Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Surbhi Chamaria
- Division of Cardiology, Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory (M.J.V., S.B., U.B., S.K., A.C., S.C., A.K., S.S.), Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Michael Buckstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology (M.B., R.B.), Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Richard Bakst
- Department of Radiation Oncology (M.B., R.B.), Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Annapoorna Kini
- Division of Cardiology, Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory (M.J.V., S.B., U.B., S.K., A.C., S.C., A.K., S.S.), Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Samin Sharma
- Division of Cardiology, Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory (M.J.V., S.B., U.B., S.K., A.C., S.C., A.K., S.S.), Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Post-intervention minimal stent area as a predictor of target lesion revascularization after everolimus-eluting stent implantation for in-stent restenosis. Coron Artery Dis 2019; 30:432-439. [DOI: 10.1097/mca.0000000000000731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
|
13
|
The effect of the debulking by excimer laser coronary angioplasty on long-term outcome compared with drug-coating balloon: insights from optical frequency domain imaging analysis. Lasers Med Sci 2019; 35:403-412. [PMID: 31264007 DOI: 10.1007/s10103-019-02833-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2019] [Accepted: 06/20/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
This study evaluated the 1-year efficacy of excimer laser coronary angioplasty (ELCA) before drug-coated balloon (DCB) dilatation for the treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR). Forty consecutive patients with ISR were treated by DCB with or without the use of ELCA (ELCA plus DCB, N = 20; DCB alone, N = 20). Debulking efficiency (DE) value was defined as the neointima area on optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI) debulked by ELCA. The patients in the ELCA plus DCB group were divided into two groups (greater DE (GDE), N = 10; smaller DE (SDE), N = 10) based on the median value of DE. Thereafter, the ISR segment was prepared with a scoring balloon, followed by DCB. At follow-up, binary restenosis and target lesion revascularization (TLR) were evaluated. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics such as age, comorbidity, and ISR type. Overall, the incidence of neoatherosclerosis in the ISR segment was 17.5%. Post-PCI, acute gain of minimum lumen diameter on quantitative coronary angiography and of minimum lumen area on OFDI was numerically higher in the GDE than in the SDE and the DCB alone group. At follow-up, the occurrences of binary restenosis and TLR in the ELCA plus DCB group were 20.0% and 10.0%; these values in the DCB alone group were 20.0% and 20.0%, respectively. Two patients from the SDE and none from the GDE developed TLR. DCB alone treatment was inferior to ELCA plus DCB treatment. However, greater ELCA debulking might be required to obtain optimal outcomes.
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
The treatment of coronary artery disease has seen rapid change following the invention of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Since its introduction and widespread adoption for the treatment of coronary artery disease, efforts have been underway to minimise both the acute and long-term complications associated with the procedures, resulting in varying degrees of success over the years. These measures have taken many forms, from the adjunctive drug treatment regimen that patients receive before, during and after procedures to the actual mechanical intervention to the vessels themselves. The current gold standard in the interventional field is second-generation drug-eluting stents. However, with ongoing research into new technologies and trials underway in absorbable and non-stent treatments, it may soon be possible to achieve the goal of leaving no long-term physical implant behind in the artery. This could overcome issues with inflammation associated with permanent foreign body implants and prove less limiting for future treatment if needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Ashman
- Cardiac Cath Lab Manager, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Völz S, Angerås O, Odenstedt J, Ioanes D, Haraldsson I, Dworeck C, Redfors B, Råmunddal T, Albertsson P, Petursson P, Omerovic E. Sustained risk of stent thrombosis and restenosis in first generation drug-eluting Stents after One Decade of Follow-up: A Report from the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry (SCAAR). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2018; 92:E403-E409. [DOI: 10.1002/ccd.27655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2018] [Revised: 03/23/2018] [Accepted: 04/15/2018] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Völz
- Department of Cardiology; Sahlgrenska University Hospital; Sweden
| | - Oskar Angerås
- Department of Cardiology; Sahlgrenska University Hospital; Sweden
| | - Jacob Odenstedt
- Department of Cardiology; Sahlgrenska University Hospital; Sweden
| | - Dan Ioanes
- Department of Cardiology; Sahlgrenska University Hospital; Sweden
| | - Inger Haraldsson
- Department of Cardiology; Sahlgrenska University Hospital; Sweden
| | | | - Björn Redfors
- Department of Cardiology; Sahlgrenska University Hospital; Sweden
| | - Truls Råmunddal
- Department of Cardiology; Aarhus University Hospital; Denmark
| | - Per Albertsson
- Department of Cardiology; Sahlgrenska University Hospital; Sweden
| | - Petur Petursson
- Department of Cardiology; Sahlgrenska University Hospital; Sweden
| | - Elmir Omerovic
- Department of Cardiology; Sahlgrenska University Hospital; Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kufner S, Joner M, Schneider S, Tölg R, Zrenner B, Repp J, Starkmann A, Xhepa E, Ibrahim T, Cassese S, Fusaro M, Ott I, Hengstenberg C, Schunkert H, Abdel-Wahab M, Laugwitz KL, Kastrati A, Byrne RA. Neointimal Modification With Scoring Balloon and Efficacy of Drug-Coated Balloon Therapy in Patients With Restenosis in Drug-Eluting Coronary Stents: A Randomized Controlled Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2018; 10:1332-1340. [PMID: 28683939 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.04.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2017] [Revised: 04/07/2017] [Accepted: 04/08/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to compare neointimal modification with scoring balloon pre-dilation before drug-coated balloon (DCB) versus DCB standard therapy in patients presenting with drug-eluting stent (DES) restenosis. BACKGROUND DCB angioplasty for the treatment of coronary drug-eluting stent restenosis has demonstrated encouraging results. The efficacy of DCB treatment relies on rapid initial drug transfer and tissue retention of the antiproliferative drug. Neointimal modification with scoring balloon pre-dilation may enhance the efficacy of DCB therapy. METHODS In this randomized, open-label, active-controlled trial, 252 patients with clinically significant DES restenosis were enrolled at 4 centers in Germany. Patients undergoing DCB angioplasty were randomly assigned to treatment with scoring balloon pre-dilation or standard therapy. The primary endpoint of the study was in-segment percentage diameter stenosis on 6- to 8-month follow-up angiography. The secondary endpoints included binary angiographic restenosis and late lumen loss on follow-up angiography, the combined incidence of death or myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, and target lesion thrombosis at 1 year. RESULTS Follow-up angiographic data at 6 to 8 months were available for 203 patients (80.6%). Scoring balloon pre-dilation compared with standard therapy showed significantly lower rates with respect to the primary endpoint (35.0 ± 16.8% vs. 40.4 ± 21.4%; p = 0.047) and binary angiographic restenosis (18.5% vs. 32.0%; p = 0.026). Late lumen loss was numerically lower after scoring balloon pre-dilation compared with standard therapy (0.31 ± 59 mm vs. 0.41 ± 0.74 mm; p = 0.27). There was no difference between the groups in the incidence of death or myocardial infarction (4.0% vs. 3.4%; p = 0.73). Scoring balloon versus standard therapy showed comparable rates of target lesion revascularization (16.2% vs. 21.8%; p = 0.26). No target lesion thrombosis occurred out to 1 year. CONCLUSIONS In patients presenting with drug-eluting stent restenosis, neointimal modification with scoring balloon improves the antirestenotic efficacy of DCB therapy. (Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results: Optimizing Treatment of Drug Eluting Stent In-Stent Restenosis 4 [ISAR-DESIRE 4]; NCT01632371).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Kufner
- Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Joner
- Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Simon Schneider
- I. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Ralph Tölg
- Herzzentrum der Segeberger Kliniken, Bad Segeberg, Germany
| | - Bernhard Zrenner
- Krankenhaus Landshut-Achdorf, Medizinische Klinik I, Landshut, Germany
| | - Janika Repp
- Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Alissa Starkmann
- Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Erion Xhepa
- Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Tareq Ibrahim
- I. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Salvatore Cassese
- Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Massimiliano Fusaro
- Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Ilka Ott
- Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Hengstenberg
- Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany; DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany
| | - Heribert Schunkert
- Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany; DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Karl-Ludwig Laugwitz
- I. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany; DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany
| | - Adnan Kastrati
- Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany; DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany
| | - Robert A Byrne
- Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany; DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany.
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Redfors B, Généreux P, Witzenbichler B, Maehara A, Weisz G, McAndrew T, Mehran R, Kirtane AJ, Stone GW. Percutaneous coronary intervention of lesions with in-stent restenosis: A report from the ADAPT-DES study. Am Heart J 2018; 197:142-149. [PMID: 29447774 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2017] [Accepted: 11/28/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a paucity of data from large contemporary cohorts of patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) treated with drug-eluting stents (DESs), and no studies have examined the impact of high platelet reactivity (HPR) on the occurrence of ischemic events after ISR percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with DESs. We sought to report outcomes after PCI of ISR lesions and its association with HPR. METHODS Patients in the prospective, multicenter ADAPT-DES study were stratified according to whether they had ISR versus non-ISR PCI. Two-year outcomes were compared between the groups using Cox proportional hazards models. HPR was defined as on-clopidogrel P2Y12 platelet reaction units >208 as measured by the VerifyNow assay; target vessel failure (TVF) was defined as the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization. RESULTS Among the 8,582 patients included in the ADAPT-DES study, 840 (9.8%) patients underwent successful ISR PCI. ISR PCI was independently associated with a higher 2-year risk of TVF (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.95; 95% CI 1.68-2.27; P<.001) and stent thrombosis (adjusted HR 1.95; 95% CI 1.08-3.51; P=.027) but not bleeding (adjusted HR 0.94; 95% CI 0.73-1.21; P=.64). There was no statistical interaction between HPR and ISR versus non-ISR PCI in regard to TVF (adjusted Pinteraction=.81). CONCLUSIONS ISR PCI is associated with a considerably higher risk of 2-year adverse ischemic events, with HPR conferring similar risk in ISR and non-ISR PCI. More effective therapeutic strategies for managing ISR lesions are necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Björn Redfors
- Clinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY
| | - Philippe Généreux
- Clinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY; Gagnon Cardiovascular Institute, Morristown Medical Center, Morristown, NJ; Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
| | | | - Akiko Maehara
- Clinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY; NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Giora Weisz
- Clinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY; Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY
| | - Thomas McAndrew
- Clinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY
| | - Roxana Mehran
- Clinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY; Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Ajay J Kirtane
- Clinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY; Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Gregg W Stone
- Clinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY; Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Moscarella E, Tanaka A, Ielasi A, Cortese B, Coscarelli S, De Angelis MC, Piraino D, Latib A, Grigis G, Bianchi R, Buccheri D, Calabrò P, Tespili M, Silva Orrego P, Colombo A, Varricchio A. Bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus everolimus-eluting stents or drug eluting balloon for the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis: 1-Year follow-up of a propensity score matching comparison (the BIORESOLVE-ISR Study). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2018; 92:668-677. [DOI: 10.1002/ccd.27473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2017] [Revised: 11/13/2017] [Accepted: 11/25/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabetta Moscarella
- Department of Cardio-Thoracic Science; Second University of Naples, Presidio Ospedaliero “Monaldi,” Azienda Ospedaliera Dei Colli; Napoli Italy
| | - Akihito Tanaka
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, EMO-GVM Centro Cuore Columbus ed Ospedale San Raffaele; Milano Italy
| | - Alfonso Ielasi
- Cardiology Division, Ospedale Bolognini Seriate, ASST Bergamo Est; Italy
| | - Bernardo Cortese
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco; Milano Italy
- Fondazione Monasterio CNR-Regione Toscana; Italy
| | | | | | - Davide Piraino
- Interventional Cardiology Unit, University of Palermo; Palermo Italy
| | - Azeem Latib
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, EMO-GVM Centro Cuore Columbus ed Ospedale San Raffaele; Milano Italy
| | - Giulietta Grigis
- Cardiology Division, Ospedale Bolognini Seriate, ASST Bergamo Est; Italy
| | - Renatomaria Bianchi
- Department of Cardio-Thoracic Science; Second University of Naples, Presidio Ospedaliero “Monaldi,” Azienda Ospedaliera Dei Colli; Napoli Italy
| | - Dario Buccheri
- Interventional Cardiology Unit, University of Palermo; Palermo Italy
| | - Paolo Calabrò
- Department of Cardio-Thoracic Science; Second University of Naples, Presidio Ospedaliero “Monaldi,” Azienda Ospedaliera Dei Colli; Napoli Italy
| | - Maurizio Tespili
- Cardiology Division, Ospedale Bolognini Seriate, ASST Bergamo Est; Italy
| | - Pedro Silva Orrego
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco; Milano Italy
| | - Antonio Colombo
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, EMO-GVM Centro Cuore Columbus ed Ospedale San Raffaele; Milano Italy
| | - Attilio Varricchio
- Department of Invasive Cardiology; Santa Maria della Pietà Hospital; Nola Napoli Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Alfonso F, Pérez-Vizcayno MJ, García Del Blanco B, García-Touchard A, López-Mínguez JR, Masotti M, Zueco J, Melgares R, Mainar V, Moreno R, Domínguez A, Sanchís J, Bethencourt A, Moreu J, Cequier A, Martí V, Otaegui I, Bastante T, Gonzalo N, Jiménez-Quevedo P, Cárdenas A, Fernández C. Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients With Bare-Metal and Drug-Eluting In-Stent Restenosis: Results From a Patient-Level Pooled Analysis of the RIBS IV and V Trials. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2017; 9:CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003479. [PMID: 27412868 DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.115.003479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2015] [Accepted: 05/31/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment of patients with drug-eluting stent (DES) in-stent restenosis (ISR) is more challenging than that of patients with bare-metal stent ISR. However, the results of everolimus-eluting stents (EES) in these distinct scenarios remain unsettled. METHODS AND RESULTS A pooled analysis of the RIBS IV (Restenosis Intra-Stent of Drug-Eluting Stents: Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon vs Everolimus-Eluting Stent) and RIBS V (Restenosis Intra-Stent of Bare Metal Stents: Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon vs Everolimus-Eluting Stent) randomized trials was performed using patient-level data to compare the efficacy of EES in bare-metal stent ISR and DES-ISR. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were identical in both trials. Results of 94 patients treated with EES for bare-metal stent ISR were compared with those of 155 patients treated with EES for DES-ISR. Baseline characteristics were more adverse in patients with DES-ISR, although they presented later and more frequently with a focal pattern. After intervention, minimal lumen diameter (2.22±0.5 versus 2.38±0.5 mm, P=0.01) was smaller in the DES-ISR group. Late angiographic findings (89.3% of eligible patients), including minimal lumen diameter (2.03±0.7 versus 2.36±0.6 mm, P<0.001) and diameter stenosis (23±22 versus 13±17%, P<0.001) were poorer in patients with DES-ISR. Results were consistent in the in-segment and in-lesion analyses. On multiple linear regression analysis, minimal lumen diameter at follow-up remained significantly smaller in patients with DES-ISR. Finally, at 1-year clinical follow-up (100% of patients), mortality (2.6 versus 0%, P<0.01) and need for target vessel revascularization (8 versus 2%, P=0.03) were higher in the DES-ISR group. CONCLUSIONS This patient-level pooled analysis of the RIBS IV and RIBS V randomized clinical trials suggests that EES provide favorable outcomes in patients with ISR. However, the results of EES are less satisfactory in patients with DES-ISR than in those with bare-metal stent ISR. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifiers: NCT01239953 and NCT01239940.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando Alfonso
- From the Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain (F.A., T.B.); Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain (M.J.P.-V., N.G., P.J.-Q., A. Cárdenas, C.F.); Fundación Interhospitalaria Investigación Cardiovascular, Madrid, Spain (M.J.P.-V.); Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain (B.G.d.B., I.O.); Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain (A.G.-T.); Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina, Badajoz, Spain (J.-R.L.-M.); Hospital Universitario Clinic de Barcelona, Spain (M.M.); Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain (J.Z.); Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain (R. Melgares); Hospital Universitario de Alicante, Spain (V. Mainar); Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain (R. Moreno); Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain (A.D.); Hospital Universitario Clínico de Valencia, Spain (J.S.); Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain (A.B.); Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Salud Toledo, Spain (J.M.); Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain (A. Cequier); and Hospital Universitario de San Pau, Barcelona, Spain (V. Martí).
| | - María José Pérez-Vizcayno
- From the Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain (F.A., T.B.); Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain (M.J.P.-V., N.G., P.J.-Q., A. Cárdenas, C.F.); Fundación Interhospitalaria Investigación Cardiovascular, Madrid, Spain (M.J.P.-V.); Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain (B.G.d.B., I.O.); Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain (A.G.-T.); Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina, Badajoz, Spain (J.-R.L.-M.); Hospital Universitario Clinic de Barcelona, Spain (M.M.); Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain (J.Z.); Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain (R. Melgares); Hospital Universitario de Alicante, Spain (V. Mainar); Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain (R. Moreno); Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain (A.D.); Hospital Universitario Clínico de Valencia, Spain (J.S.); Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain (A.B.); Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Salud Toledo, Spain (J.M.); Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain (A. Cequier); and Hospital Universitario de San Pau, Barcelona, Spain (V. Martí)
| | - Bruno García Del Blanco
- From the Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain (F.A., T.B.); Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain (M.J.P.-V., N.G., P.J.-Q., A. Cárdenas, C.F.); Fundación Interhospitalaria Investigación Cardiovascular, Madrid, Spain (M.J.P.-V.); Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain (B.G.d.B., I.O.); Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain (A.G.-T.); Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina, Badajoz, Spain (J.-R.L.-M.); Hospital Universitario Clinic de Barcelona, Spain (M.M.); Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain (J.Z.); Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain (R. Melgares); Hospital Universitario de Alicante, Spain (V. Mainar); Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain (R. Moreno); Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain (A.D.); Hospital Universitario Clínico de Valencia, Spain (J.S.); Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain (A.B.); Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Salud Toledo, Spain (J.M.); Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain (A. Cequier); and Hospital Universitario de San Pau, Barcelona, Spain (V. Martí)
| | - Arturo García-Touchard
- From the Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain (F.A., T.B.); Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain (M.J.P.-V., N.G., P.J.-Q., A. Cárdenas, C.F.); Fundación Interhospitalaria Investigación Cardiovascular, Madrid, Spain (M.J.P.-V.); Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain (B.G.d.B., I.O.); Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain (A.G.-T.); Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina, Badajoz, Spain (J.-R.L.-M.); Hospital Universitario Clinic de Barcelona, Spain (M.M.); Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain (J.Z.); Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain (R. Melgares); Hospital Universitario de Alicante, Spain (V. Mainar); Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain (R. Moreno); Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain (A.D.); Hospital Universitario Clínico de Valencia, Spain (J.S.); Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain (A.B.); Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Salud Toledo, Spain (J.M.); Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain (A. Cequier); and Hospital Universitario de San Pau, Barcelona, Spain (V. Martí)
| | - José-Ramón López-Mínguez
- From the Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain (F.A., T.B.); Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain (M.J.P.-V., N.G., P.J.-Q., A. Cárdenas, C.F.); Fundación Interhospitalaria Investigación Cardiovascular, Madrid, Spain (M.J.P.-V.); Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain (B.G.d.B., I.O.); Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain (A.G.-T.); Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina, Badajoz, Spain (J.-R.L.-M.); Hospital Universitario Clinic de Barcelona, Spain (M.M.); Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain (J.Z.); Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain (R. Melgares); Hospital Universitario de Alicante, Spain (V. Mainar); Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain (R. Moreno); Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain (A.D.); Hospital Universitario Clínico de Valencia, Spain (J.S.); Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain (A.B.); Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Salud Toledo, Spain (J.M.); Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain (A. Cequier); and Hospital Universitario de San Pau, Barcelona, Spain (V. Martí)
| | - Mónica Masotti
- From the Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain (F.A., T.B.); Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain (M.J.P.-V., N.G., P.J.-Q., A. Cárdenas, C.F.); Fundación Interhospitalaria Investigación Cardiovascular, Madrid, Spain (M.J.P.-V.); Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain (B.G.d.B., I.O.); Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain (A.G.-T.); Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina, Badajoz, Spain (J.-R.L.-M.); Hospital Universitario Clinic de Barcelona, Spain (M.M.); Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain (J.Z.); Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain (R. Melgares); Hospital Universitario de Alicante, Spain (V. Mainar); Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain (R. Moreno); Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain (A.D.); Hospital Universitario Clínico de Valencia, Spain (J.S.); Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain (A.B.); Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Salud Toledo, Spain (J.M.); Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain (A. Cequier); and Hospital Universitario de San Pau, Barcelona, Spain (V. Martí)
| | - Javier Zueco
- From the Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain (F.A., T.B.); Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain (M.J.P.-V., N.G., P.J.-Q., A. Cárdenas, C.F.); Fundación Interhospitalaria Investigación Cardiovascular, Madrid, Spain (M.J.P.-V.); Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain (B.G.d.B., I.O.); Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain (A.G.-T.); Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina, Badajoz, Spain (J.-R.L.-M.); Hospital Universitario Clinic de Barcelona, Spain (M.M.); Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain (J.Z.); Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain (R. Melgares); Hospital Universitario de Alicante, Spain (V. Mainar); Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain (R. Moreno); Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain (A.D.); Hospital Universitario Clínico de Valencia, Spain (J.S.); Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain (A.B.); Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Salud Toledo, Spain (J.M.); Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain (A. Cequier); and Hospital Universitario de San Pau, Barcelona, Spain (V. Martí)
| | - Rafael Melgares
- From the Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain (F.A., T.B.); Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain (M.J.P.-V., N.G., P.J.-Q., A. Cárdenas, C.F.); Fundación Interhospitalaria Investigación Cardiovascular, Madrid, Spain (M.J.P.-V.); Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain (B.G.d.B., I.O.); Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain (A.G.-T.); Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina, Badajoz, Spain (J.-R.L.-M.); Hospital Universitario Clinic de Barcelona, Spain (M.M.); Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain (J.Z.); Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain (R. Melgares); Hospital Universitario de Alicante, Spain (V. Mainar); Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain (R. Moreno); Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain (A.D.); Hospital Universitario Clínico de Valencia, Spain (J.S.); Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain (A.B.); Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Salud Toledo, Spain (J.M.); Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain (A. Cequier); and Hospital Universitario de San Pau, Barcelona, Spain (V. Martí)
| | - Vicente Mainar
- From the Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain (F.A., T.B.); Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain (M.J.P.-V., N.G., P.J.-Q., A. Cárdenas, C.F.); Fundación Interhospitalaria Investigación Cardiovascular, Madrid, Spain (M.J.P.-V.); Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain (B.G.d.B., I.O.); Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain (A.G.-T.); Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina, Badajoz, Spain (J.-R.L.-M.); Hospital Universitario Clinic de Barcelona, Spain (M.M.); Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain (J.Z.); Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain (R. Melgares); Hospital Universitario de Alicante, Spain (V. Mainar); Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain (R. Moreno); Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain (A.D.); Hospital Universitario Clínico de Valencia, Spain (J.S.); Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain (A.B.); Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Salud Toledo, Spain (J.M.); Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain (A. Cequier); and Hospital Universitario de San Pau, Barcelona, Spain (V. Martí)
| | - Raul Moreno
- From the Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain (F.A., T.B.); Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain (M.J.P.-V., N.G., P.J.-Q., A. Cárdenas, C.F.); Fundación Interhospitalaria Investigación Cardiovascular, Madrid, Spain (M.J.P.-V.); Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain (B.G.d.B., I.O.); Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain (A.G.-T.); Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina, Badajoz, Spain (J.-R.L.-M.); Hospital Universitario Clinic de Barcelona, Spain (M.M.); Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain (J.Z.); Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain (R. Melgares); Hospital Universitario de Alicante, Spain (V. Mainar); Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain (R. Moreno); Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain (A.D.); Hospital Universitario Clínico de Valencia, Spain (J.S.); Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain (A.B.); Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Salud Toledo, Spain (J.M.); Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain (A. Cequier); and Hospital Universitario de San Pau, Barcelona, Spain (V. Martí)
| | - Antonio Domínguez
- From the Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain (F.A., T.B.); Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain (M.J.P.-V., N.G., P.J.-Q., A. Cárdenas, C.F.); Fundación Interhospitalaria Investigación Cardiovascular, Madrid, Spain (M.J.P.-V.); Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain (B.G.d.B., I.O.); Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain (A.G.-T.); Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina, Badajoz, Spain (J.-R.L.-M.); Hospital Universitario Clinic de Barcelona, Spain (M.M.); Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain (J.Z.); Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain (R. Melgares); Hospital Universitario de Alicante, Spain (V. Mainar); Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain (R. Moreno); Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain (A.D.); Hospital Universitario Clínico de Valencia, Spain (J.S.); Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain (A.B.); Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Salud Toledo, Spain (J.M.); Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain (A. Cequier); and Hospital Universitario de San Pau, Barcelona, Spain (V. Martí)
| | - Juan Sanchís
- From the Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain (F.A., T.B.); Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain (M.J.P.-V., N.G., P.J.-Q., A. Cárdenas, C.F.); Fundación Interhospitalaria Investigación Cardiovascular, Madrid, Spain (M.J.P.-V.); Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain (B.G.d.B., I.O.); Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain (A.G.-T.); Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina, Badajoz, Spain (J.-R.L.-M.); Hospital Universitario Clinic de Barcelona, Spain (M.M.); Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain (J.Z.); Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain (R. Melgares); Hospital Universitario de Alicante, Spain (V. Mainar); Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain (R. Moreno); Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain (A.D.); Hospital Universitario Clínico de Valencia, Spain (J.S.); Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain (A.B.); Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Salud Toledo, Spain (J.M.); Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain (A. Cequier); and Hospital Universitario de San Pau, Barcelona, Spain (V. Martí)
| | - Armando Bethencourt
- From the Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain (F.A., T.B.); Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain (M.J.P.-V., N.G., P.J.-Q., A. Cárdenas, C.F.); Fundación Interhospitalaria Investigación Cardiovascular, Madrid, Spain (M.J.P.-V.); Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain (B.G.d.B., I.O.); Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain (A.G.-T.); Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina, Badajoz, Spain (J.-R.L.-M.); Hospital Universitario Clinic de Barcelona, Spain (M.M.); Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain (J.Z.); Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain (R. Melgares); Hospital Universitario de Alicante, Spain (V. Mainar); Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain (R. Moreno); Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain (A.D.); Hospital Universitario Clínico de Valencia, Spain (J.S.); Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain (A.B.); Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Salud Toledo, Spain (J.M.); Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain (A. Cequier); and Hospital Universitario de San Pau, Barcelona, Spain (V. Martí)
| | - José Moreu
- From the Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain (F.A., T.B.); Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain (M.J.P.-V., N.G., P.J.-Q., A. Cárdenas, C.F.); Fundación Interhospitalaria Investigación Cardiovascular, Madrid, Spain (M.J.P.-V.); Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain (B.G.d.B., I.O.); Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain (A.G.-T.); Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina, Badajoz, Spain (J.-R.L.-M.); Hospital Universitario Clinic de Barcelona, Spain (M.M.); Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain (J.Z.); Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain (R. Melgares); Hospital Universitario de Alicante, Spain (V. Mainar); Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain (R. Moreno); Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain (A.D.); Hospital Universitario Clínico de Valencia, Spain (J.S.); Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain (A.B.); Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Salud Toledo, Spain (J.M.); Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain (A. Cequier); and Hospital Universitario de San Pau, Barcelona, Spain (V. Martí)
| | - Angel Cequier
- From the Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain (F.A., T.B.); Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain (M.J.P.-V., N.G., P.J.-Q., A. Cárdenas, C.F.); Fundación Interhospitalaria Investigación Cardiovascular, Madrid, Spain (M.J.P.-V.); Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain (B.G.d.B., I.O.); Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain (A.G.-T.); Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina, Badajoz, Spain (J.-R.L.-M.); Hospital Universitario Clinic de Barcelona, Spain (M.M.); Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain (J.Z.); Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain (R. Melgares); Hospital Universitario de Alicante, Spain (V. Mainar); Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain (R. Moreno); Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain (A.D.); Hospital Universitario Clínico de Valencia, Spain (J.S.); Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain (A.B.); Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Salud Toledo, Spain (J.M.); Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain (A. Cequier); and Hospital Universitario de San Pau, Barcelona, Spain (V. Martí)
| | - Vicens Martí
- From the Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain (F.A., T.B.); Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain (M.J.P.-V., N.G., P.J.-Q., A. Cárdenas, C.F.); Fundación Interhospitalaria Investigación Cardiovascular, Madrid, Spain (M.J.P.-V.); Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain (B.G.d.B., I.O.); Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain (A.G.-T.); Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina, Badajoz, Spain (J.-R.L.-M.); Hospital Universitario Clinic de Barcelona, Spain (M.M.); Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain (J.Z.); Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain (R. Melgares); Hospital Universitario de Alicante, Spain (V. Mainar); Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain (R. Moreno); Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain (A.D.); Hospital Universitario Clínico de Valencia, Spain (J.S.); Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain (A.B.); Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Salud Toledo, Spain (J.M.); Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain (A. Cequier); and Hospital Universitario de San Pau, Barcelona, Spain (V. Martí)
| | - Imanol Otaegui
- From the Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain (F.A., T.B.); Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain (M.J.P.-V., N.G., P.J.-Q., A. Cárdenas, C.F.); Fundación Interhospitalaria Investigación Cardiovascular, Madrid, Spain (M.J.P.-V.); Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain (B.G.d.B., I.O.); Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain (A.G.-T.); Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina, Badajoz, Spain (J.-R.L.-M.); Hospital Universitario Clinic de Barcelona, Spain (M.M.); Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain (J.Z.); Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain (R. Melgares); Hospital Universitario de Alicante, Spain (V. Mainar); Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain (R. Moreno); Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain (A.D.); Hospital Universitario Clínico de Valencia, Spain (J.S.); Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain (A.B.); Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Salud Toledo, Spain (J.M.); Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain (A. Cequier); and Hospital Universitario de San Pau, Barcelona, Spain (V. Martí)
| | - Teresa Bastante
- From the Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain (F.A., T.B.); Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain (M.J.P.-V., N.G., P.J.-Q., A. Cárdenas, C.F.); Fundación Interhospitalaria Investigación Cardiovascular, Madrid, Spain (M.J.P.-V.); Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain (B.G.d.B., I.O.); Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain (A.G.-T.); Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina, Badajoz, Spain (J.-R.L.-M.); Hospital Universitario Clinic de Barcelona, Spain (M.M.); Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain (J.Z.); Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain (R. Melgares); Hospital Universitario de Alicante, Spain (V. Mainar); Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain (R. Moreno); Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain (A.D.); Hospital Universitario Clínico de Valencia, Spain (J.S.); Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain (A.B.); Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Salud Toledo, Spain (J.M.); Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain (A. Cequier); and Hospital Universitario de San Pau, Barcelona, Spain (V. Martí)
| | - Nieves Gonzalo
- From the Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain (F.A., T.B.); Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain (M.J.P.-V., N.G., P.J.-Q., A. Cárdenas, C.F.); Fundación Interhospitalaria Investigación Cardiovascular, Madrid, Spain (M.J.P.-V.); Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain (B.G.d.B., I.O.); Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain (A.G.-T.); Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina, Badajoz, Spain (J.-R.L.-M.); Hospital Universitario Clinic de Barcelona, Spain (M.M.); Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain (J.Z.); Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain (R. Melgares); Hospital Universitario de Alicante, Spain (V. Mainar); Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain (R. Moreno); Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain (A.D.); Hospital Universitario Clínico de Valencia, Spain (J.S.); Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain (A.B.); Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Salud Toledo, Spain (J.M.); Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain (A. Cequier); and Hospital Universitario de San Pau, Barcelona, Spain (V. Martí)
| | - Pilar Jiménez-Quevedo
- From the Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain (F.A., T.B.); Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain (M.J.P.-V., N.G., P.J.-Q., A. Cárdenas, C.F.); Fundación Interhospitalaria Investigación Cardiovascular, Madrid, Spain (M.J.P.-V.); Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain (B.G.d.B., I.O.); Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain (A.G.-T.); Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina, Badajoz, Spain (J.-R.L.-M.); Hospital Universitario Clinic de Barcelona, Spain (M.M.); Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain (J.Z.); Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain (R. Melgares); Hospital Universitario de Alicante, Spain (V. Mainar); Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain (R. Moreno); Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain (A.D.); Hospital Universitario Clínico de Valencia, Spain (J.S.); Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain (A.B.); Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Salud Toledo, Spain (J.M.); Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain (A. Cequier); and Hospital Universitario de San Pau, Barcelona, Spain (V. Martí)
| | - Alberto Cárdenas
- From the Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain (F.A., T.B.); Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain (M.J.P.-V., N.G., P.J.-Q., A. Cárdenas, C.F.); Fundación Interhospitalaria Investigación Cardiovascular, Madrid, Spain (M.J.P.-V.); Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain (B.G.d.B., I.O.); Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain (A.G.-T.); Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina, Badajoz, Spain (J.-R.L.-M.); Hospital Universitario Clinic de Barcelona, Spain (M.M.); Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain (J.Z.); Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain (R. Melgares); Hospital Universitario de Alicante, Spain (V. Mainar); Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain (R. Moreno); Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain (A.D.); Hospital Universitario Clínico de Valencia, Spain (J.S.); Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain (A.B.); Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Salud Toledo, Spain (J.M.); Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain (A. Cequier); and Hospital Universitario de San Pau, Barcelona, Spain (V. Martí)
| | - Cristina Fernández
- From the Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain (F.A., T.B.); Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain (M.J.P.-V., N.G., P.J.-Q., A. Cárdenas, C.F.); Fundación Interhospitalaria Investigación Cardiovascular, Madrid, Spain (M.J.P.-V.); Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain (B.G.d.B., I.O.); Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain (A.G.-T.); Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina, Badajoz, Spain (J.-R.L.-M.); Hospital Universitario Clinic de Barcelona, Spain (M.M.); Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain (J.Z.); Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain (R. Melgares); Hospital Universitario de Alicante, Spain (V. Mainar); Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain (R. Moreno); Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain (A.D.); Hospital Universitario Clínico de Valencia, Spain (J.S.); Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain (A.B.); Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Salud Toledo, Spain (J.M.); Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain (A. Cequier); and Hospital Universitario de San Pau, Barcelona, Spain (V. Martí)
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Battig MR, Fishbein I, Levy RJ, Alferiev IS, Guerrero D, Chorny M. Optimizing endothelial cell functionalization for cell therapy of vascular proliferative disease using a direct contact co-culture system. Drug Deliv Transl Res 2017; 8:954-963. [PMID: 28755158 DOI: 10.1007/s13346-017-0412-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Increased susceptibility to thrombosis, neoatherosclerosis, and restenosis due to incomplete regrowth of the protective endothelial layer remains a critical limitation of the interventional strategies currently used clinically to relieve atherosclerotic obstruction. Rapid recovery of endothelium holds promise for both preventing the thrombotic events and reducing post-angioplasty restenosis, providing the rationale for developing cell delivery strategies for accelerating arterial reendothelialization. The successful translation of experimental cell therapies into clinically viable treatment modalities for restoring vascular endothelium critically depends on identifying strategies for enhancing the functionality of endothelial cells (EC) derived from high cardiovascular risk patients, the target group for the majority of angioplasty procedures. Enhancing EC-associated nitric oxide (NO) synthesis by inducing overexpression of NO synthase (NOS) has shown promise as a way of increasing paracrine activity and restoring function of EC. In the present study, we developed a direct contact co-culture approach compatible with highly labile effectors, such as NO, and applied it for determining the effect of EC functionalization via NOS gene transfer on the growth of co-cultured arterial smooth muscle cells (A10 cell line) exhibiting the defining characteristics of neointimal cells. Bovine aortic endothelial cells magnetically transduced with inducible NOS-encoding adenovirus (Ad) formulated in zinc oleate-based magnetic nanoparticles (MNP[iNOSAd]) strongly suppressed growth of proliferating A10 and attenuated the stimulatory effect of a potent mitogen, platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF-BB), whereas EC functionalization with free iNOSAd or MNP formulated with a different isoform of the enzyme, endothelial NOS, was associated with lower levels of NO synthesis and less pronounced antiproliferative activity toward co-cultured A10 cells. These results show feasibility of applying magnetically facilitated gene transfer to potentiate therapeutically relevant effects of EC for targeted cell therapy of restenosis. The direct contact co-culture methodology provides a sensitive and reliable tool with potential utility for a variety of biomedical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark R Battig
- Division of Cardiology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, and Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Ilia Fishbein
- Division of Cardiology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, and Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Robert J Levy
- Division of Cardiology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, and Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Ivan S Alferiev
- Division of Cardiology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, and Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - David Guerrero
- Division of Cardiology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, and Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Michael Chorny
- Division of Cardiology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, and Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Alfonso F, Pérez-Vizcayno MJ, García del Blanco B, García-Touchard A, López-Mínguez JR, Sabaté M, Zueco J, Melgares R, Hernández R, Moreno R, Domínguez A, Sanchís J, Moris C, Moreu J, Cequier A, Romaguera R, Rivero F, Cuesta J, Gonzalo N, Jiménez-Quevedo P, Cárdenas A, Fernández C. Usefulness of Drug-Eluting Balloons for Bare-Metal and Drug-Eluting In-Stent Restenosis (from the RIBS IV and V Randomized Trials). Am J Cardiol 2017; 119:983-990. [PMID: 28139220 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2016] [Revised: 12/19/2016] [Accepted: 12/19/2016] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Treatment of patients with drug-eluting stent (DES) in-stent restenosis (ISR) is particularly challenging. We sought to compare results of drug-eluting balloons in patients with DES-ISR with those in patients with bare-metal stent (BMS) ISR. A pooled analysis of the Restenosis Intra-Stent: Drug-Eluting Balloon versus Everolimus-Eluting Stent IV and V randomized trials was performed. Both trials had identical inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results of drug-eluting balloons in 95 patients with BMS-ISR and 154 patients with DES-ISR were compared. Patients with DES-ISR were more frequently diabetics, presented more often as an acute coronary syndrome and had more severe lesions and more frequently a focal pattern, including edge-ISR. Late angiographic findings (92% of eligible patients), including minimal lumen diameter (1.80 ± 0.6 vs 2.01 ± 0.6 mm, p = 0.001; absolute mean difference 0.21 mm; 95% confidence interval 0.04 to 0.38; p = 0.014) and restenosis rate (19% vs 9.5%, p <0.05) were poorer in DES-ISR. Results were consistent across 10 prespecified subgroups. Moreover, on multiple linear regression analysis, minimal lumen diameter at follow-up remained significantly smaller in patients with DES-ISR after adjusting for potential confounders (adjusted absolute mean difference 0.17 mm; 95% confidence interval 0.04 to 0.41; p = 0.019). Finally, at 1-year clinical follow-up (100% of patients), rates of target vessel revascularization (16% vs 6%, p = 0.02) and of the main combined clinical end point (18% vs 8%, p = 0.03) were significantly higher in patients treated for DES-ISR. In conclusion, this study confirms the efficacy of DEB for patients with ISR. However, the long-term clinical and angiographic results of DEB are poorer in patients with DES-ISR than in those with BMS-ISR. (ClinicalTrials.govIdentifier:NCT01239953&NCT01239940).
Collapse
|
22
|
Kokkinidis DG, Waldo SW, Armstrong EJ. Treatment of coronary artery in-stent restenosis. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2017; 15:191-202. [DOI: 10.1080/14779072.2017.1284588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Damianos G. Kokkinidis
- Section of Cardiology, Denver VA Medical Center and University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Stephen W. Waldo
- Section of Cardiology, Denver VA Medical Center and University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Ehrin J. Armstrong
- Section of Cardiology, Denver VA Medical Center and University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Rathod KS, Jones DA, Van-Eijl TJA, Tsang H, Warren H, Hamshere SM, Kapil V, Jain AK, Deaner A, Poulter N, Caulfield MJ, Mathur A, Ahluwalia A. Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study investigating the effects of inorganic nitrate on vascular function, platelet reactivity and restenosis in stable angina: protocol of the NITRATE-OCT study. BMJ Open 2016; 6:e012728. [PMID: 27998900 PMCID: PMC5223652 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The mainstay treatment for reducing the symptoms of angina and long-term risk of heart attacks in patients with heart disease is stent implantation in the diseased coronary artery. While this procedure has revolutionised treatment, the incidence of secondary events remains a concern. These repeat events are thought to be due, in part, to continued enhanced platelet reactivity, endothelial dysfunction and ultimately restenosis of the stented artery. In this study, we will investigate whether a once a day inorganic nitrate administration might favourably modulate platelet reactivity and endothelial function leading to a decrease in restenosis. METHODS AND DESIGN NITRATE-OCT is a double-blind, randomised, single-centre, placebo-controlled phase II trial that will enrol 246 patients with stable angina due to have elective percutaneous coronary intervention procedure with stent implantation. Patients will be randomised to receive 6 months of a once a day dose of either nitrate-rich beetroot juice or nitrate-deplete beetroot juice (placebo) starting up to 1 week before their procedure. The primary outcome is reduction of in-stent late loss assessed by quantitative coronary angiography and optical coherence tomography at 6 months. The study is powered to detect a 0.22±0.55 mm reduction in late loss in the treatment group compared with the placebo group. Secondary end points include change from baseline assessment of endothelial function measured using flow-mediated dilation at 6 months, target vessel revascularisation (TVR), restenosis rate (diameter>50%) and in-segment late loss at 6 months, markers of inflammation and platelet reactivity and major adverse cardiac events (ie, myocardial infarction, death, cerebrovascular accident, TVR) at 12 and 24 months. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study was approved by the Local Ethics Committee (15/LO/0555). Trial results will be published according to the CONSORT statement and will be presented at conferences and reported in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS NCT02529189 and ISRCTN17373946, Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krishnaraj S Rathod
- Barts NIHR Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Centre of Clinical Pharmacology, William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University, London, UK
- Department of Cardiology, Barts Heart Centre,2 St. Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Daniel A Jones
- Barts NIHR Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Centre of Clinical Pharmacology, William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University, London, UK
- Department of Cardiology, Barts Heart Centre,2 St. Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - T J A Van-Eijl
- Department of Cardiology, Barts Heart Centre,2 St. Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Hilda Tsang
- Imperial Clinical Trials Unit, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Helen Warren
- Barts NIHR Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Centre of Clinical Pharmacology, William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University, London, UK
| | - Stephen M Hamshere
- Department of Cardiology, Barts Heart Centre,2 St. Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Vikas Kapil
- Barts NIHR Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Centre of Clinical Pharmacology, William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University, London, UK
| | - Ajay K Jain
- Department of Cardiology, Barts Heart Centre,2 St. Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
- King George Hospital, Barking and Havering NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Andrew Deaner
- Department of Cardiology, Barts Heart Centre,2 St. Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
- King George Hospital, Barking and Havering NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Neil Poulter
- Imperial Clinical Trials Unit, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Mark J Caulfield
- Barts NIHR Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Centre of Clinical Pharmacology, William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University, London, UK
| | - Anthony Mathur
- Barts NIHR Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Centre of Clinical Pharmacology, William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University, London, UK
- Department of Cardiology, Barts Heart Centre,2 St. Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Amrita Ahluwalia
- Barts NIHR Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Centre of Clinical Pharmacology, William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Moscarella E, Ielasi A, Granata F, Coscarelli S, Stabile E, Latib A, Cortese B, Tespili M, Tanaka A, Capozzolo C, Caliendo L, Colombo A, Varricchio A. Long-Term Clinical Outcomes After Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Implantation for the Treatment of Coronary In-Stent Restenosis: A Multicenter Italian Experience. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2016; 9:e003148. [PMID: 27059683 DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.115.003148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2015] [Accepted: 03/06/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) is still challenging. In this setting, the use of bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) seems attractive because it allows drug delivery combined with transient vessel scaffolding. We aimed to investigate the long-term results after BVS use in ISR lesions. METHODS AND RESULTS A prospective analysis was performed on all patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with BVS implantation for ISR at 7 Italian Centers. Primary end point was the device-oriented composite end point (cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization) at the longest follow-up available. From April 2012 to June 2014, 116 patients (127 lesions) underwent percutaneous coronary intervention for ISR with BVS implantation. Among the ISR lesions, the majority were drug-eluting stent ISR (78, 61.6%), de novo ISR (92, 72.4%), and diffuse ISR (81, 63.8%). Procedural success was achieved for all (100%) patients. No in-hospital death, myocardial infarction, or revascularization occurred. At 15 months of follow-up, the incidence of the device-oriented composite end point estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method was 9.1%. No significant differences were reported between drug-eluting stent and bare-metal stent ISR groups in terms of device-oriented composite end point (10.9% versus 6.4%; hazard ratio, 1.7; 95% confidence interval, 0.5-6.5; P=0.425) and its singular components (cardiac death: 2.8% versus 2.0%, hazard ratio, 1.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.1-14.1, P=0.843; target vessel myocardial infarction: 1.5% versus 0%, P=0.421; ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization: 9.6% versus 4.4%, hazard ratio, 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.5-10.8, P=0.309). CONCLUSIONS Our registry suggests that the use of BVS implantation for the treatment of complex drug-eluting stent and bare-metal stent ISR lesions might be associated with acceptable long-term clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabetta Moscarella
- From the Department of Cardio-Thoracic Science, Second University of Naples, Presidio Ospedaliero "Monaldi", Azienda Ospedaliera Dei Colli, Napoli, Italy (E.M.); Cardiology Division, Azienda Ospedaliera Bolognini Seriate, Bergamo, Italy (A.I., M.T.); Laboratory of Invasive Cardiology, Santa Maria della Pietà Hospital, Nola, Napoli, Italy (F.G., L.C., A.V.); Cardiovascular Intervention Unit, San Martino Hospital, Belluno, Italy (S.C.); Laboratory of Invasive Cardiology, Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche Avanzate, Università degli Studi "Federico II", Napoli, Italy (E.S.); Interventional Cardiology Unit, EMO-GVM Centro Cuore Columbus ed Ospedale San Raffaele, Milano, Italy (A.L., A.T., A.C.); Laboratory of Invasive Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliera Fatebenefratelli, Milano, Italy (B.C.); and Laboratory of Invasive Cardiology, Department of Cardiology, Presidio Ospedaliero "Monaldi", Azienda Ospedaliera Dei Colli, Napoli, Italy (C.C.).
| | - Alfonso Ielasi
- From the Department of Cardio-Thoracic Science, Second University of Naples, Presidio Ospedaliero "Monaldi", Azienda Ospedaliera Dei Colli, Napoli, Italy (E.M.); Cardiology Division, Azienda Ospedaliera Bolognini Seriate, Bergamo, Italy (A.I., M.T.); Laboratory of Invasive Cardiology, Santa Maria della Pietà Hospital, Nola, Napoli, Italy (F.G., L.C., A.V.); Cardiovascular Intervention Unit, San Martino Hospital, Belluno, Italy (S.C.); Laboratory of Invasive Cardiology, Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche Avanzate, Università degli Studi "Federico II", Napoli, Italy (E.S.); Interventional Cardiology Unit, EMO-GVM Centro Cuore Columbus ed Ospedale San Raffaele, Milano, Italy (A.L., A.T., A.C.); Laboratory of Invasive Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliera Fatebenefratelli, Milano, Italy (B.C.); and Laboratory of Invasive Cardiology, Department of Cardiology, Presidio Ospedaliero "Monaldi", Azienda Ospedaliera Dei Colli, Napoli, Italy (C.C.)
| | - Francesco Granata
- From the Department of Cardio-Thoracic Science, Second University of Naples, Presidio Ospedaliero "Monaldi", Azienda Ospedaliera Dei Colli, Napoli, Italy (E.M.); Cardiology Division, Azienda Ospedaliera Bolognini Seriate, Bergamo, Italy (A.I., M.T.); Laboratory of Invasive Cardiology, Santa Maria della Pietà Hospital, Nola, Napoli, Italy (F.G., L.C., A.V.); Cardiovascular Intervention Unit, San Martino Hospital, Belluno, Italy (S.C.); Laboratory of Invasive Cardiology, Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche Avanzate, Università degli Studi "Federico II", Napoli, Italy (E.S.); Interventional Cardiology Unit, EMO-GVM Centro Cuore Columbus ed Ospedale San Raffaele, Milano, Italy (A.L., A.T., A.C.); Laboratory of Invasive Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliera Fatebenefratelli, Milano, Italy (B.C.); and Laboratory of Invasive Cardiology, Department of Cardiology, Presidio Ospedaliero "Monaldi", Azienda Ospedaliera Dei Colli, Napoli, Italy (C.C.)
| | - Sebastian Coscarelli
- From the Department of Cardio-Thoracic Science, Second University of Naples, Presidio Ospedaliero "Monaldi", Azienda Ospedaliera Dei Colli, Napoli, Italy (E.M.); Cardiology Division, Azienda Ospedaliera Bolognini Seriate, Bergamo, Italy (A.I., M.T.); Laboratory of Invasive Cardiology, Santa Maria della Pietà Hospital, Nola, Napoli, Italy (F.G., L.C., A.V.); Cardiovascular Intervention Unit, San Martino Hospital, Belluno, Italy (S.C.); Laboratory of Invasive Cardiology, Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche Avanzate, Università degli Studi "Federico II", Napoli, Italy (E.S.); Interventional Cardiology Unit, EMO-GVM Centro Cuore Columbus ed Ospedale San Raffaele, Milano, Italy (A.L., A.T., A.C.); Laboratory of Invasive Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliera Fatebenefratelli, Milano, Italy (B.C.); and Laboratory of Invasive Cardiology, Department of Cardiology, Presidio Ospedaliero "Monaldi", Azienda Ospedaliera Dei Colli, Napoli, Italy (C.C.)
| | - Eugenio Stabile
- From the Department of Cardio-Thoracic Science, Second University of Naples, Presidio Ospedaliero "Monaldi", Azienda Ospedaliera Dei Colli, Napoli, Italy (E.M.); Cardiology Division, Azienda Ospedaliera Bolognini Seriate, Bergamo, Italy (A.I., M.T.); Laboratory of Invasive Cardiology, Santa Maria della Pietà Hospital, Nola, Napoli, Italy (F.G., L.C., A.V.); Cardiovascular Intervention Unit, San Martino Hospital, Belluno, Italy (S.C.); Laboratory of Invasive Cardiology, Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche Avanzate, Università degli Studi "Federico II", Napoli, Italy (E.S.); Interventional Cardiology Unit, EMO-GVM Centro Cuore Columbus ed Ospedale San Raffaele, Milano, Italy (A.L., A.T., A.C.); Laboratory of Invasive Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliera Fatebenefratelli, Milano, Italy (B.C.); and Laboratory of Invasive Cardiology, Department of Cardiology, Presidio Ospedaliero "Monaldi", Azienda Ospedaliera Dei Colli, Napoli, Italy (C.C.)
| | - Azeem Latib
- From the Department of Cardio-Thoracic Science, Second University of Naples, Presidio Ospedaliero "Monaldi", Azienda Ospedaliera Dei Colli, Napoli, Italy (E.M.); Cardiology Division, Azienda Ospedaliera Bolognini Seriate, Bergamo, Italy (A.I., M.T.); Laboratory of Invasive Cardiology, Santa Maria della Pietà Hospital, Nola, Napoli, Italy (F.G., L.C., A.V.); Cardiovascular Intervention Unit, San Martino Hospital, Belluno, Italy (S.C.); Laboratory of Invasive Cardiology, Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche Avanzate, Università degli Studi "Federico II", Napoli, Italy (E.S.); Interventional Cardiology Unit, EMO-GVM Centro Cuore Columbus ed Ospedale San Raffaele, Milano, Italy (A.L., A.T., A.C.); Laboratory of Invasive Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliera Fatebenefratelli, Milano, Italy (B.C.); and Laboratory of Invasive Cardiology, Department of Cardiology, Presidio Ospedaliero "Monaldi", Azienda Ospedaliera Dei Colli, Napoli, Italy (C.C.)
| | - Bernardo Cortese
- From the Department of Cardio-Thoracic Science, Second University of Naples, Presidio Ospedaliero "Monaldi", Azienda Ospedaliera Dei Colli, Napoli, Italy (E.M.); Cardiology Division, Azienda Ospedaliera Bolognini Seriate, Bergamo, Italy (A.I., M.T.); Laboratory of Invasive Cardiology, Santa Maria della Pietà Hospital, Nola, Napoli, Italy (F.G., L.C., A.V.); Cardiovascular Intervention Unit, San Martino Hospital, Belluno, Italy (S.C.); Laboratory of Invasive Cardiology, Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche Avanzate, Università degli Studi "Federico II", Napoli, Italy (E.S.); Interventional Cardiology Unit, EMO-GVM Centro Cuore Columbus ed Ospedale San Raffaele, Milano, Italy (A.L., A.T., A.C.); Laboratory of Invasive Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliera Fatebenefratelli, Milano, Italy (B.C.); and Laboratory of Invasive Cardiology, Department of Cardiology, Presidio Ospedaliero "Monaldi", Azienda Ospedaliera Dei Colli, Napoli, Italy (C.C.)
| | - Maurizio Tespili
- From the Department of Cardio-Thoracic Science, Second University of Naples, Presidio Ospedaliero "Monaldi", Azienda Ospedaliera Dei Colli, Napoli, Italy (E.M.); Cardiology Division, Azienda Ospedaliera Bolognini Seriate, Bergamo, Italy (A.I., M.T.); Laboratory of Invasive Cardiology, Santa Maria della Pietà Hospital, Nola, Napoli, Italy (F.G., L.C., A.V.); Cardiovascular Intervention Unit, San Martino Hospital, Belluno, Italy (S.C.); Laboratory of Invasive Cardiology, Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche Avanzate, Università degli Studi "Federico II", Napoli, Italy (E.S.); Interventional Cardiology Unit, EMO-GVM Centro Cuore Columbus ed Ospedale San Raffaele, Milano, Italy (A.L., A.T., A.C.); Laboratory of Invasive Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliera Fatebenefratelli, Milano, Italy (B.C.); and Laboratory of Invasive Cardiology, Department of Cardiology, Presidio Ospedaliero "Monaldi", Azienda Ospedaliera Dei Colli, Napoli, Italy (C.C.)
| | - Akihito Tanaka
- From the Department of Cardio-Thoracic Science, Second University of Naples, Presidio Ospedaliero "Monaldi", Azienda Ospedaliera Dei Colli, Napoli, Italy (E.M.); Cardiology Division, Azienda Ospedaliera Bolognini Seriate, Bergamo, Italy (A.I., M.T.); Laboratory of Invasive Cardiology, Santa Maria della Pietà Hospital, Nola, Napoli, Italy (F.G., L.C., A.V.); Cardiovascular Intervention Unit, San Martino Hospital, Belluno, Italy (S.C.); Laboratory of Invasive Cardiology, Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche Avanzate, Università degli Studi "Federico II", Napoli, Italy (E.S.); Interventional Cardiology Unit, EMO-GVM Centro Cuore Columbus ed Ospedale San Raffaele, Milano, Italy (A.L., A.T., A.C.); Laboratory of Invasive Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliera Fatebenefratelli, Milano, Italy (B.C.); and Laboratory of Invasive Cardiology, Department of Cardiology, Presidio Ospedaliero "Monaldi", Azienda Ospedaliera Dei Colli, Napoli, Italy (C.C.)
| | - Claudia Capozzolo
- From the Department of Cardio-Thoracic Science, Second University of Naples, Presidio Ospedaliero "Monaldi", Azienda Ospedaliera Dei Colli, Napoli, Italy (E.M.); Cardiology Division, Azienda Ospedaliera Bolognini Seriate, Bergamo, Italy (A.I., M.T.); Laboratory of Invasive Cardiology, Santa Maria della Pietà Hospital, Nola, Napoli, Italy (F.G., L.C., A.V.); Cardiovascular Intervention Unit, San Martino Hospital, Belluno, Italy (S.C.); Laboratory of Invasive Cardiology, Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche Avanzate, Università degli Studi "Federico II", Napoli, Italy (E.S.); Interventional Cardiology Unit, EMO-GVM Centro Cuore Columbus ed Ospedale San Raffaele, Milano, Italy (A.L., A.T., A.C.); Laboratory of Invasive Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliera Fatebenefratelli, Milano, Italy (B.C.); and Laboratory of Invasive Cardiology, Department of Cardiology, Presidio Ospedaliero "Monaldi", Azienda Ospedaliera Dei Colli, Napoli, Italy (C.C.)
| | - Luigi Caliendo
- From the Department of Cardio-Thoracic Science, Second University of Naples, Presidio Ospedaliero "Monaldi", Azienda Ospedaliera Dei Colli, Napoli, Italy (E.M.); Cardiology Division, Azienda Ospedaliera Bolognini Seriate, Bergamo, Italy (A.I., M.T.); Laboratory of Invasive Cardiology, Santa Maria della Pietà Hospital, Nola, Napoli, Italy (F.G., L.C., A.V.); Cardiovascular Intervention Unit, San Martino Hospital, Belluno, Italy (S.C.); Laboratory of Invasive Cardiology, Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche Avanzate, Università degli Studi "Federico II", Napoli, Italy (E.S.); Interventional Cardiology Unit, EMO-GVM Centro Cuore Columbus ed Ospedale San Raffaele, Milano, Italy (A.L., A.T., A.C.); Laboratory of Invasive Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliera Fatebenefratelli, Milano, Italy (B.C.); and Laboratory of Invasive Cardiology, Department of Cardiology, Presidio Ospedaliero "Monaldi", Azienda Ospedaliera Dei Colli, Napoli, Italy (C.C.)
| | - Antonio Colombo
- From the Department of Cardio-Thoracic Science, Second University of Naples, Presidio Ospedaliero "Monaldi", Azienda Ospedaliera Dei Colli, Napoli, Italy (E.M.); Cardiology Division, Azienda Ospedaliera Bolognini Seriate, Bergamo, Italy (A.I., M.T.); Laboratory of Invasive Cardiology, Santa Maria della Pietà Hospital, Nola, Napoli, Italy (F.G., L.C., A.V.); Cardiovascular Intervention Unit, San Martino Hospital, Belluno, Italy (S.C.); Laboratory of Invasive Cardiology, Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche Avanzate, Università degli Studi "Federico II", Napoli, Italy (E.S.); Interventional Cardiology Unit, EMO-GVM Centro Cuore Columbus ed Ospedale San Raffaele, Milano, Italy (A.L., A.T., A.C.); Laboratory of Invasive Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliera Fatebenefratelli, Milano, Italy (B.C.); and Laboratory of Invasive Cardiology, Department of Cardiology, Presidio Ospedaliero "Monaldi", Azienda Ospedaliera Dei Colli, Napoli, Italy (C.C.)
| | - Attilio Varricchio
- From the Department of Cardio-Thoracic Science, Second University of Naples, Presidio Ospedaliero "Monaldi", Azienda Ospedaliera Dei Colli, Napoli, Italy (E.M.); Cardiology Division, Azienda Ospedaliera Bolognini Seriate, Bergamo, Italy (A.I., M.T.); Laboratory of Invasive Cardiology, Santa Maria della Pietà Hospital, Nola, Napoli, Italy (F.G., L.C., A.V.); Cardiovascular Intervention Unit, San Martino Hospital, Belluno, Italy (S.C.); Laboratory of Invasive Cardiology, Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche Avanzate, Università degli Studi "Federico II", Napoli, Italy (E.S.); Interventional Cardiology Unit, EMO-GVM Centro Cuore Columbus ed Ospedale San Raffaele, Milano, Italy (A.L., A.T., A.C.); Laboratory of Invasive Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliera Fatebenefratelli, Milano, Italy (B.C.); and Laboratory of Invasive Cardiology, Department of Cardiology, Presidio Ospedaliero "Monaldi", Azienda Ospedaliera Dei Colli, Napoli, Italy (C.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Habara S, Kadota K, Kuwayama A, Shimada T, Ohya M, Miura K, Amano H, Kubo S, Hyodo Y, Otsuru S, Tada T, Tanaka H, Fuku Y, Goto T. Late Restenosis After Both First-Generation and Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent Implantations Occurs in Patients With Drug-Eluting Stent Restenosis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2016; 9:CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004449. [DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.116.004449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2016] [Accepted: 11/17/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background—
There are currently inadequate data about whether late restenosis occurs after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in patients with DES restenosis.
Methods and Results—
We collected data for 608 patients who received revascularization for DES restenosis between 2004 and 2012 and analyzed 688 lesions: 359 lesions treated with a first-generation DES (first DES) and 329 lesions treated with a second-generation DES (second DES). Two serial angiographic follow-ups were routinely planned for the patients (at 8 and 20 months after the procedure). Early follow-up angiography was performed for 620 lesions (90.1%), and recurrent restenosis occurred in 84 lesions (25.8%) in the first DES group and in 72 lesions (24.5%) in the second DES group (
P
=0.78). Target lesion revascularization was performed for 69 lesions (21.2%) in the first DES group and for 48 lesions (16.3%) in the second DES group (
P
=0.15). Late follow-up angiography was performed for 438 (87.1%) of the remaining 503 lesions (excluding target lesion revascularization lesions), and late restenosis was found in 35 lesions (15.8%) in the first DES group and in 28 lesions (14.7%) in the second DES group (
P
=0.79). Nonfocal-type restenosis, percentage diameter stenosis after the procedure, previous stent size ≤2.5 mm, and right coronary artery ostial lesion were independent predictors of early restenosis. Nonfocal-type restenosis, percentage diameter stenosis at early follow-up, and stent fracture were independent predictors of late restenosis.
Conclusions—
Late restenosis occurs after both first DES implantation and second DES implantation for DES restenosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seiji Habara
- From the Department of Cardiology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Japan
| | - Kazushige Kadota
- From the Department of Cardiology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Japan
| | - Akimune Kuwayama
- From the Department of Cardiology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Japan
| | - Takenobu Shimada
- From the Department of Cardiology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Japan
| | - Masanobu Ohya
- From the Department of Cardiology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Japan
| | - Katsuya Miura
- From the Department of Cardiology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Japan
| | - Hidewo Amano
- From the Department of Cardiology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Kubo
- From the Department of Cardiology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Japan
| | - Yusuke Hyodo
- From the Department of Cardiology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Japan
| | - Suguru Otsuru
- From the Department of Cardiology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Japan
| | - Takeshi Tada
- From the Department of Cardiology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Tanaka
- From the Department of Cardiology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Japan
| | - Yasushi Fuku
- From the Department of Cardiology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Goto
- From the Department of Cardiology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abdelmegid MAKF, Ahmed TAN, Kato M, Ando K, Domei T, Iwabuchi M, Nobuyoshi M. Drug-eluting stents or balloon angioplasty for drug-eluting stent-associated restenosis: An observational follow-up study of first-time versus repeated restenosis. J Saudi Heart Assoc 2016; 29:76-83. [PMID: 28373780 PMCID: PMC5366658 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsha.2016.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2016] [Revised: 09/29/2016] [Accepted: 10/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The treatment of patients with repeated drug-eluting stent-in stent restenosis (DES-ISR) remains a challenge and a burdensome clinical problem. METHODS Over a 3-year period, 130 lesions in 123 patients who underwent target lesion revascularization (TLR) for DES restenosis were included in the study. They were classified into two main groups: the first group having first-time DES-ISR (n = 84), and the second group having rerestenosis of DES-treated DES-ISR (n = 39). Further classification according to the treatment strategy yielded four subgroups: balloon angioplasty (BA) in first-time DES-ISR (n = 66), re-DES in the same group (n = 22), BA in rerestenosis of DES-treated DES-ISR (n = 30), and re-DES in the same group (n = 10). Angiographic follow-up was planned at 1 year, and clinical follow-up for re-TLR up to 2 years later. RESULTS The mean duration of clinical follow-up was 24.8 ± 9.7 months. The angiographic follow-up data were obtained for 108 patients (87.8%) at 1 year. Among patients treated for first-time DES-ISR, late lumen loss (0.65 ± 0.83 mm and 1.02 ± 0.52 mm, p = 0.02) and binary restenosis rates (25% and 49.1%, p = 0.05) were significantly less in those undergoing re-DES compared with BA. This benefit was not evident in patients having rerestenosis of DES-treated DES-ISR. Re-TLR at 2 years was significantly less in the re-DES group compared with BA (log rank p = 0.038) in first-time DES-ISR patients, while no significant difference (log rank p = 0.58) was observed in those having rerestenosis of DES-treated DES-ISR. CONCLUSION While a strategy of re-DES would be better than BA in first-time DES-ISR, this could not be extrapolated to rerestenosis cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Aboel-Kassem F Abdelmegid
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Asyut University Hospital, Asyut, aEgypt; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kitakyushu, bJapan
| | - Tarek A N Ahmed
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Asyut University Hospital, Asyut, aEgypt
| | - Masashi Kato
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kitakyushu, bJapan
| | - Kenji Ando
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kitakyushu, bJapan
| | - Takenori Domei
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kitakyushu, bJapan
| | - Masashi Iwabuchi
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kitakyushu, bJapan
| | - Masakiyo Nobuyoshi
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kitakyushu, bJapan
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Lee JM, Park J, Rhee TM, Kim HS. Treatment for in-stent restenosis: patient-specific decision rather than universal recommendation. J Thorac Dis 2016; 8:E847-9. [PMID: 27618871 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2016.07.57] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Joo Myung Lee
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Hirose S, Ashikaga T, Hatano Y, Yoshikawa S, Sasaoka T, Maejima Y, Isobe M. Treatment of in-stent restenosis with excimer laser coronary angioplasty: benefits over scoring balloon angioplasty alone. Lasers Med Sci 2016; 31:1691-1696. [DOI: 10.1007/s10103-016-2039-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2016] [Accepted: 07/25/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
29
|
Resch M, Ostheim P, Endemann DH, Debl K, Buchner S, Birner C, Maier LS, Kerber S, Luchner A, Griese DP. Drug Coated Balloon Is Less Effective for Treatment of DES In-Stent Restenosis Both in Native Coronary Arteries and Saphenous Vein Grafts: Results From a Bicenter Registry. J Interv Cardiol 2016; 29:461-468. [PMID: 27477024 DOI: 10.1111/joic.12324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The paclitaxel drug coated balloon (DCB) is an established treatment for bare metal stent (BMS) in-stent restenosis (ISR) in native coronary arteries. The evidence of DCB-application for drug eluting stent (DES) ISR both in native coronaries and saphenous vein grafts (SVG) is limited. Aim of our study was to compare the differential efficacy of DCB for treatment of BMS- and DES-ISR in native coronary vessels and SVGs. METHODS AND RESULTS N = 135 DCB-treated patients with available follow up (FU) angiography were included in this retrospective study. Patients received treatment between April 2009 and March 2013 at 2 tertiary care hospitals in Germany. DCB was applied in BMS-ISR (n = 65; 48%) and DES-ISR (n = 70; 52%). DCB-treated lesions were located in native coronary arteries (n = 110; 81%; BMS-ISR: n = 58; 53%; DES-ISR: n = 52; 47%) and SVGs (n = 25; 19%; BMS-ISR: n = 7, 28%; DES-ISR: n = 18, 72%). Median FU was 12 months. Endpoints were binary restenosis and target lesion revascularization (TLR). Binary restenosis (29% vs. 57%; P < 0.01) and TLR (18% vs. 46%; P < 0.01) were significantly more frequent in DES-ISR versus BMS-ISR. In SVGs, TLR was required in 72% (DES-ISR) versus 14% (BMS-ISR); P = 0.02. In the Kaplan-Meier-analysis freedom from both endpoints was significantly decreased in the DES-lesions both in the total population (binary restenosis P < 0.01; TLR P < 0.01) and native coronaries (binary restenosis P = 0.02; TLR P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS DCB treatment is less effective in DES-ISR than in BMS-ISR. The diminished efficacy of DCB treatment is even more pronounced in DES-ISR located within degenerated SVGs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Resch
- Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
| | - Patrick Ostheim
- Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Dierk H Endemann
- Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Kurt Debl
- Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Buchner
- Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Birner
- Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Lars S Maier
- Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Kerber
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center Bad Neustadt, Bad Neustadt, Germany
| | - Andreas Luchner
- Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.,Department of Internal Medicine I, Klinikum St. Marien, Amberg, Germany
| | - Daniel P Griese
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center Bad Neustadt, Bad Neustadt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Komura N, Tsujita K, Yamanaga K, Sakamoto K, Kaikita K, Hokimoto S, Iwashita S, Miyazaki T, Akasaka T, Arima Y, Yamamoto E, Izumiya Y, Yamamuro M, Kojima S, Tayama S, Sugiyama S, Matsui K, Nakamura S, Hibi K, Kimura K, Umemura S, Ogawa H. Impaired Peripheral Endothelial Function Assessed by Digital Reactive Hyperemia Peripheral Arterial Tonometry and Risk of In-Stent Restenosis. J Am Heart Assoc 2016; 5:JAHA.116.003202. [PMID: 27317348 PMCID: PMC4937265 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.116.003202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Background Drug‐eluting stents are replacing bare‐metal stents, but in‐stent restenosis (ISR) remains a problem. Reactive hyperemia index (RHI) assessed by peripheral arterial tonometry evaluates endothelial function noninvasively. We prospectively assessed the prognostic value of RHI in predicting ISR after percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods and Results RHI was measured before percutaneous coronary intervention and at follow‐up (F/U) angiography (F/U RHI; 6 and 9 months post bare‐metal stents– and drug‐eluting stents– percutaneous coronary intervention, respectively) in 249 consecutive patients. At F/U, ISR (stenosis >50% of diameter) was seen in 68 patients (27.3%). F/U natural logarithm (RHI) was significantly lower in patients with ISR than in those without (0.52±0.23 versus 0.65±0.27, P<0.01); no between‐group difference in initial natural logarithm (RHI) (0.60±0.26 versus 0.62±0.25, P=0.56) was seen. By multivariate logistic regression analysis, even after adjusting for other significant parameters in univariate analysis, F/U natural logarithm (RHI) independently predicted ISR (odds ratio: 0.13; 95% CI: 0.04–0.48; P=0.002). In receiver operating‐characteristic analysis, F/U RHI was the strongest predictor of ISR (area under the curve: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.60–0.75; P<0.01; RHI <1.73 had 67.6% sensitivity, 64.1% specificity); area under the curve significantly improved from 0.62 to 0.70 when RHI was added to traditional ISR risk factors (P=0.02). Net reclassification index was significant after addition of RHI (26.5%, P=0.002). Conclusions Impaired RHI at F/U angiography independently correlated with ISR, adding incremental prognostic value to the ISR‐risk stratification following percutaneous coronary intervention. Clinical Trial Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT02131935.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naohiro Komura
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Kenichi Tsujita
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Kenshi Yamanaga
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Kenji Sakamoto
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Koichi Kaikita
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Seiji Hokimoto
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Satomi Iwashita
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Takashi Miyazaki
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Tomonori Akasaka
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Arima
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Eiichiro Yamamoto
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Izumiya
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Megumi Yamamuro
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Sunao Kojima
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Shinji Tayama
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | | | - Kunihiko Matsui
- Department of Community Medicine, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | | | - Kiyoshi Hibi
- Division of Cardiology, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Kazuo Kimura
- Division of Cardiology, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Satoshi Umemura
- Department of Medical Science and Cardiorenal Medicine, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Hisao Ogawa
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Yabe T, Toda M, Nakanishi R, Saito D, Watanabe I, Okubo R, Amano H, Ikeda T. Same or Different Drug-Eluting Stent Re-Implantation for Drug-Eluting Stent Restenosis: An Assessment Including Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents. J Interv Cardiol 2016; 29:311-8. [PMID: 27245125 DOI: 10.1111/joic.12299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We examined the long-term outcomes of implanting a different type of drug-eluting stent (DES), including second-generation DES, for treatment of DES-in stent restenosis (ISR). BACKGROUND Treatment for DES-ISR has not been standardized. METHODS The subjects were 80 patients with 89 lesions underwent DES implantation for DES-ISR. The patients were divided into the group of patients receiving the same DES for DES-ISR (Homo-stent: 24 patients, 25 lesions) and a different DES for DES-ISR (Hetero-stent: 56 patients, 64 lesions). The primary endpoint was survival free of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization (TVR). The secondary endpoint was late loss at 8-12 months follow-up. In the subgroup of patients who were treated with second-generation DES for DES-ISR, we also assessed the survival free of MACE. RESULTS During a mean follow-up of 45.1 ± 21.2 months, 26 patients experienced MACE. There was no significant difference in the survival free of MACE (Log rank P = 0.17). In the sub-analysis of second generation DES, MACE was significantly higher in the Homo-stent group compared to the Hetero-stent group (Log rank P = 0.04). Late loss was significantly higher in the Homo-stent group than in the Hetero-stent group (0.86 ± 1.03 vs. 0.38 ± 0.74 mm, P = 0.03). This trend was prominent in the first-generation DES group. CONCLUSIONS Although there was no significant difference in MACE between the Hetero-stent and the Homo-stent groups including both first and second-generation DES, the sub-analysis demonstrated different DES implantation for DES-ISR significantly improved the MACE rate among patients treated with second-generation DES. (J Interven Cardiol 2016;29:311-318).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takayuki Yabe
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Toho University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mikihito Toda
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Toho University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Rine Nakanishi
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Toho University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Daiga Saito
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Toho University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ippei Watanabe
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Toho University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryo Okubo
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Toho University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideo Amano
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Toho University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takanori Ikeda
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Toho University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Miura K, Kadota K, Habara S, Miyawaki H, Shimada T, Ohya M, Amano H, Izawa Y, Hyodo Y, Otsuru S, Hasegawa D, Tada T, Tanaka H, Fuku Y, Goto T, Mitsudo K. Ten-year clinical outcomes after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: Impact of an in-stent restenosis target lesion. Am Heart J 2016; 175:47-55. [PMID: 27179723 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2015] [Accepted: 02/12/2016] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Little is known about the long-term outcomes after first-generation sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation. We aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes up to 10 years after SES implantation. METHODS The study population comprised 342 patients (504 lesions) who underwent SES implantation between January 2002 and December 2004. The median duration of follow-up was 3816 days (interquartile range [Q1-Q3], 3,705-3,883 days). RESULTS The cumulative event rate of definite stent thrombosis was 3.9%. The cumulative rate of target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 1, 5, and 10 years was 8.7%, 18.8%, and 31.1%, respectively, and the annual rate of TLR was 3.1%. Clinically driven TLR occurred at relatively constant rate during 10 years (2.0% per year). In a multivariate analysis, higher body mass index, hemodialysis, in-stent restenosis (ISR) target lesion, and total stent length >30 mm were independent risk factors of TLR within 5 years. An independent risk factor of TLR beyond 5 years was ISR target lesion. CONCLUSIONS Late TLR after SES implantation is a long-term hazard, lasting up to 10 years. The ISR target lesion is a risk factor of TLR during 10 years.
Collapse
|
33
|
Rittger H, Wöhrle J, Brachmann J, Hohenforst-Schmidt W, Schlundt C, Lonke S, von Cranach M, Markovic S, Achenbach S, Waliszewski M. Angiographic patterns of drug-eluting stent restenosis after treatment with drug-coated balloon versus balloon angioplasty: Late lumen loss subgroup analyses of the PEPCAD-DES study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2016; 88:529-534. [DOI: 10.1002/ccd.26451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2015] [Accepted: 01/17/2016] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jochen Wöhrle
- Klinik Für Innere Medizin II; Universitätsklinikum Ulm; Ulm Germany
| | | | | | | | - Sandra Lonke
- Medizinische Klinik I; Klinikum Fuerth; Fürth Germany
| | | | - Sinisa Markovic
- Klinik Für Innere Medizin II; Universitätsklinikum Ulm; Ulm Germany
| | - Stephan Achenbach
- Medizinische Klinik 2; Universitätsklinikum Erlangen; Erlangen Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Alfonso F, Pérez-Vizcayno MJ, García del Blanco B, García-Touchard A, Masotti M, López-Minguez JR, Iñiguez A, Zueco J, Velazquez M, Cequier A, Lázaro-García R, Martí V, Moris C, Urbano-Carrillo C, Bastante T, Rivero F, Cárdenas A, Gonzalo N, Jiménez-Quevedo P, Fernández C. Comparison of the Efficacy of Everolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Drug-Eluting Balloons in Patients With In-Stent Restenosis (from the RIBS IV and V Randomized Clinical Trials). Am J Cardiol 2016; 117:546-554. [PMID: 26725102 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.11.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2015] [Revised: 11/18/2015] [Accepted: 11/18/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Treatment of patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains a challenge. This study sought to compare the efficacy of everolimus-eluting stents (EESs) and drug-eluting balloons (DEBs) with paclitaxel in patients with ISR. A pooled analysis of the Restenosis Intra-Stent of Drug-Eluting Stents: Drug-Eluting Balloon vs Everolimus-Eluting Stent (RIBS IV) and Restenosis Intra-Stent of Bare-Metal Stents: Drug-Eluting Balloon vs Everolimus-Eluting Stent (RIBS V) randomized trials was performed using patient-level data. In both trials, EESs were compared with DEBs in patients with ISR (RIBS V included 189 patients with bare-metal ISR; RIBS IV included 309 patients with drug-eluting ISR). Inclusion and exclusion criteria were identical in both trials. A total of 249 patients were allocated to EES and 249 to DEB. Clinical follow-up at 1 year was obtained in all (100%) patients and late angiography (median 249 days) in 91% of eligible patients. Compared with patients treated with DEBs, patients treated with EESs obtained better short-term results (postprocedural minimal lumen diameter 2.28 ± 0.5 vs 2.12 ± 0.4 mm, p <0.0001). At follow-up, patients treated with EESs had larger in-segment minimal lumen diameter (primary end point 2.16 ± 0.7 vs 1.88 ± 0.6 mm, p <0.0001; absolute mean difference 0.28 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.16 to 0.40) and net lumen gain (1.33 ± 0.6 vs 1.00 ± 0.7 mm, p <0.0001) and had lower %diameter stenosis (19 ± 21% vs 28 ± 22%, p <0.0001) and binary restenosis rate (8.7% vs 15.7%, p = 0.02). Consistent results were observed in the in-lesion analysis. No interactions were found between the underlying stent type and treatment effects. At 1-year clinical follow-up, the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization was significantly reduced in the EES arm (8.8% vs 14.5%, p = 0.03; hazard ratio 0.59, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.94) mainly driven by a lower need for target vessel revascularization (6% vs 12.4%, p = 0.01, hazard ratio 0.46, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.86). This pooled analysis of the RIBS IV and RIBS V randomized trials demonstrates the superiority of EES over DEB in the treatment of patients with ISR.
Collapse
|
35
|
Basavarajaiah S, Naganuma T, Latib A, Sticchi A, Ciconte G, Panoulas V, Chieffo A, Montorfano M, Carlino M, Colombo A. Treatment of drug-eluting stent restenosis: Comparison between drug-eluting balloon versus second-generation drug-eluting stents from a retrospective observational study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2015; 88:522-528. [DOI: 10.1002/ccd.26368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2015] [Revised: 10/22/2015] [Accepted: 11/28/2015] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sandeep Basavarajaiah
- Heart of England NHS Trust; Birmingham United Kingdom
- EMO-GVM Centro Cuore Columbus; Milan Italy
- San Raffaele Scientific Institute; Milan Italy
| | - Toru Naganuma
- EMO-GVM Centro Cuore Columbus; Milan Italy
- San Raffaele Scientific Institute; Milan Italy
| | - Azeem Latib
- EMO-GVM Centro Cuore Columbus; Milan Italy
- San Raffaele Scientific Institute; Milan Italy
| | | | | | - Vasilis Panoulas
- EMO-GVM Centro Cuore Columbus; Milan Italy
- San Raffaele Scientific Institute; Milan Italy
| | | | | | | | - Antonio Colombo
- EMO-GVM Centro Cuore Columbus; Milan Italy
- San Raffaele Scientific Institute; Milan Italy
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Goel SS, Dilip Gajulapalli R, Athappan G, Philip F, Gupta S, Murat Tuzcu E, Ellis SG, Mishkel G, Kapadia SR. Management of drug eluting stent in-stent restenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2015; 87:1080-91. [PMID: 26613637 DOI: 10.1002/ccd.26151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2015] [Revised: 07/14/2015] [Accepted: 07/21/2015] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal management for coronary drug eluting stent in-stent restenosis (DES ISR) is unclear. We performed a meta-analysis of observational and randomized studies to compare the outcomes of management of DES ISR using DES, drug eluting balloon (DEB), or balloon angioplasty (BA). METHODS Eligible studies (25 single arm and 13 comparative, including 4 randomized studies with a total of 7,474 patients with DES ISR) were identified using MEDLINE search and proceedings of international meetings. Outcomes studied include major adverse cardiac events (MACE), target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel revascularization (TVR), myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis (ST), and mortality. Follow-up ranged from 0.5 to 3.5 years (mean 1.4 years). RESULTS The rate of TLR was significantly lower in the DES (odds ratio [OR] 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.36-0.69) and DEB (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.18-0.55) groups compared to BA. Similarly, TVR rate was significantly lower in the DES (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.39-0.77) and DEB (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.18-0.58) groups compared to BA. All other outcomes were similar between the DES/BA and DEB/BA comparisons. TLR was significantly lower in the DES group compared to BA for vessels < or > 2.75 mm. CONCLUSION Treatment of coronary DES ISR with DES or DEB is associated with a reduction in the risk of TLR and TVR compared to BA alone. The relative risk reduction for TLR with DES is similar to DEB. DEBs have a potential role in the treatment of DES ISR by avoiding placement of another layer of stent. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sachin S Goel
- Prairie Cardiovascular Consultants at St John's Hospital, Springfield, Illinois
| | | | | | - Femi Philip
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of California (Davis) Medical Center, Sacramento, California
| | - Supriya Gupta
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - E Murat Tuzcu
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Stephen G Ellis
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Gregory Mishkel
- Prairie Cardiovascular Consultants at St John's Hospital, Springfield, Illinois
| | - Samir R Kapadia
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Rittger H, Waliszewski M, Brachmann J, Hohenforst-Schmidt W, Ohlow M, Brugger A, Thiele H, Birkemeyer R, Kurowski V, Schlundt C, Zimmermann S, Lonke S, von Cranach M, Markovic S, Daniel WG, Achenbach S, Wöhrle J. Long-Term Outcomes After Treatment With a Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Versus Balloon Angioplasty. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2015; 8:1695-700. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.07.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2015] [Revised: 06/03/2015] [Accepted: 07/17/2015] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
38
|
Beresniak A, Caruba T, Sabatier B, Juillière Y, Dubourg O, Danchin N. Cost-effectiveness modelling of percutaneous coronary interventions in stable coronary artery disease. World J Cardiol 2015; 7:594-602. [PMID: 26516413 PMCID: PMC4620070 DOI: 10.4330/wjc.v7.i10.594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2015] [Revised: 03/06/2015] [Accepted: 09/30/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The objective of this study is to develop a cost-effectiveness model comparing drug eluting stents (DES) vs bare metal stent (BMS) in patients suffering of stable coronary artery disease. Using a 2-years time horizon, two simulation models have been developed: BMS first line strategy and DES first line strategy. Direct medical costs were estimated considering ambulatory and hospital costs. The effectiveness endpoint was defined as treatment success, which is the absence of major adverse cardiac events. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses were carried out using 10000 Monte-Carlo simulations. DES appeared slightly more efficacious over 2 years (60% of success) when compared to BMS (58% of success). Total costs over 2 years were estimated at 9303 € for the DES and at 8926 € for bare metal stent. Hence, corresponding mean cost-effectiveness ratios showed slightly lower costs (P < 0.05) per success for the BMS strategy (15520 €/success), as compared to the DES strategy (15588 €/success). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio is 18850 € for one additional percent of success. The sequential strategy including BMS as the first option appears to be slightly less efficacious but more cost-effective compared to the strategy including DES as first option. Future modelling approaches should confirm these results as further comparative data in stable coronary artery disease and long-term evidence become available.
Collapse
|
39
|
Kang IS, Shehata I, Shin DH, Kim JS, Kim BK, Ko YG, Choi D, Jang Y, Hong MK. Comparison between drug-coated balloon angioplasty and second-generation drug-eluting stent placement for the treatment of in-stent restenosis after drug-eluting stent implantation. Heart Vessels 2015; 31:1405-11. [DOI: 10.1007/s00380-015-0741-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2015] [Accepted: 08/28/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
40
|
Colombo A, Ruparelia N. Is a Drug-Eluting Stent the Default Treatment Strategy for Drug-Eluting Stent Restenosis? J Am Coll Cardiol 2015; 66:34-6. [PMID: 26139055 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.04.055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2015] [Accepted: 04/14/2015] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Colombo
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Department of Interventional Cardiology, EMO-GVM Centro Cuore Columbus, Milan, Italy.
| | - Neil Ruparelia
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Department of Interventional Cardiology, EMO-GVM Centro Cuore Columbus, Milan, Italy; Department of Cardiology, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Li J, Liu WL, Yi X, Feng GK, Lu Z, Jiang XJ, Li XY. Paclitaxel-coated balloons for the treatment of patients with in-stent restenosis: A meta-analysis of angiographic and clinical data. Exp Ther Med 2015; 9:2285-2292. [PMID: 26136975 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2015.2431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2014] [Accepted: 03/17/2015] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCBs) have become attractive alternative treatment options for patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR); however, the safety and efficacy of PCBs in comparison with those of conventional therapies are less well defined. The aim of this meta-analysis was to systematically review the efficacy and safety of PCBs for patients with ISR using comparisons with control groups. Electronic databases, such as MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, were searched, and eligible studies that compared PCBs with uncoated balloons (UCBs) or drug-eluting stents (DESs) in patients with ISR were considered. Subgroup analyses were performed with different control groups. Nine studies (1,488 patients, 1,608 lesions) were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with patients who underwent UCB angioplasty, those who underwent PCB angioplasty exhibited a clear superiority in late lumen loss (LLL) [weighted mean difference (WMD), -0.46; 95% confidence interval (CI), (-0.59)-(-0.34); P<0.00001] and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) [odds ratio (OR), 0.21; 95% CI, 0.13-0.33; P<0.00001]. The OR for myocardial infarction (MI) (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.15-1.47; P=0.19) did not reach statistical significance. PCBs were associated with similar outcomes when compared with DESs with regard to LLL (WMD, -0.04; 95% CI, -0.18-0.10; P=0.57), MACEs (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.36-1.53; P=0.42) and the ORs for all endpoints, including total mortality, target lesion revascularization, MI, stent thrombosis and binary restenosis, and no statistically significant differences were found. This meta-analysis showed that PCBs are associated with superior outcomes when compared with UCBs in the management of ISR, and are at least as efficacious and as well tolerated as DESs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Li
- Department of Cardiology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430060, P.R. China
| | - Wan-Li Liu
- Department of Cardiology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430060, P.R. China
| | - Xin Yi
- Department of Cardiology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430060, P.R. China
| | - Gao-Ke Feng
- Department of Cardiology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430060, P.R. China
| | - Zhao Lu
- Department of Cardiology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430060, P.R. China
| | - Xue-Jun Jiang
- Department of Cardiology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430060, P.R. China
| | - Xiao-Yan Li
- Department of Cardiology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430060, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Alfonso F, Pérez-Vizcayno MJ, Cárdenas A, García del Blanco B, García-Touchard A, López-Minguéz JR, Benedicto A, Masotti M, Zueco J, Iñiguez A, Velázquez M, Moreno R, Mainar V, Domínguez A, Pomar F, Melgares R, Rivero F, Jiménez-Quevedo P, Gonzalo N, Fernández C, Macaya C. A Prospective Randomized Trial of Drug-Eluting Balloons Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients With In-Stent Restenosis of Drug-Eluting Stents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015; 66:23-33. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.04.063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 212] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2015] [Revised: 04/17/2015] [Accepted: 04/20/2015] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
43
|
Alfonso F, Pérez-Vizcayno MJ, Cárdenas A, García del Blanco B, García-Touchard A, López-Minguéz JR, Rivero F, Masotti M, Zueco J, Cequier A, Morís C, Fernández-Ortíz A, Escaned J, Jiménez-Quevedo P, Gonzalo N, Fernández C, Macaya C. Rationale and design of the RIBS IV randomised clinical trial (drug-eluting balloons versus everolimus-eluting stents for patients with drug-eluting stent restenosis). EUROINTERVENTION 2015; 11:336-42. [DOI: 10.4244/eijy14m09_07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
44
|
Marino BCA, Nascimento GA, Rabelo W, Marino MA, Marino RL, Ribeiro ALP. Clinical Coronary In-Stent Restenosis Follow-Up after Treatment and Analyses of Clinical Outcomes. Arq Bras Cardiol 2015; 104:375-86. [PMID: 25651344 PMCID: PMC4495452 DOI: 10.5935/abc.20140216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2014] [Revised: 10/22/2014] [Accepted: 11/04/2014] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical in-stent restenosis (CISR) is the main limitation of coronary angioplasty with stent implantation. OBJECTIVE Describe the clinical and angiographic characteristics of CISR and the outcomes over a minimum follow-up of 12 months after its diagnosis and treatment. METHODS We analyzed in 110 consecutive patients with CISR the clinical presentation, angiographic characteristics, treatment and combined primary outcomes (cardiovascular death, nonfatal acute myocardial infarction [AMI]) and combined secondary (unstable angina with hospitalization, target vessel revascularization and target lesion revascularization) during a minimal follow-up of one year. RESULTS Mean age was 61 ± 11 years (68.2% males). Clinical presentations included acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in 62.7% and proliferative ISR in 34.5%. CISR was treated with implantation of drug-eluting stents (DES) in 36.4%, Bare Metal Stent (BMS) in 23.6%, myocardial revascularization surgery in 18.2%, balloon angioplasty in 15.5% and clinical treatment in 6.4%. During a median follow-up of 19.7 months, the primary outcome occurred in 18 patients, including 6 (5.5%) deaths and 13 (11.8%) AMI events. Twenty-four patients presented a secondary outcome. Predictors of the primary outcome were CISR with DES (HR = 4.36 [1.44-12.85]; p = 0.009) and clinical treatment for CISR (HR = 10.66 [2.53-44.87]; p = 0.001). Treatment of CISR with BMS (HR = 4.08 [1.75-9.48]; p = 0.001) and clinical therapy (HR = 6.29 [1.35-29.38]; p = 0.019) emerged as predictors of a secondary outcome. CONCLUSION Patients with CISR present in most cases with ACS and with a high frequency of adverse events during a medium-term follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Campos Abreu Marino
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em
Ciências da Saúde do Adulto. Faculdade de Medicina – Universidade Federal
de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil
- Departamento de Cardiologia do Hospital Madre Teresa, Belo
Horizonte, Minas Gerais – Brazil
| | - Guilherme Abreu Nascimento
- Departamento de Cardiologia Intervencionista do Hospital
Madre Teresa, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais – Brazil
| | - Walter Rabelo
- Departamento de Cardiologia do Hospital Madre Teresa, Belo
Horizonte, Minas Gerais – Brazil
| | - Marcos Antônio Marino
- Departamento de Cardiologia Intervencionista do Hospital
Madre Teresa, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais – Brazil
| | - Roberto Luiz Marino
- Departamento de Cardiologia do Hospital Madre Teresa, Belo
Horizonte, Minas Gerais – Brazil
| | - Antonio Luiz Pinho Ribeiro
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em
Ciências da Saúde do Adulto. Faculdade de Medicina – Universidade Federal
de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil
- Departamento de Clínica Médica, Faculdade de
Medicina – Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais,
Brasil
- Divisão de Cardiologia e Cirurgia Cardiovascular,
Hospital das Clínicas – Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG). Belo
Horizonte, Minas Gerais – Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Tada T, Kadota K, Hosogi S, Miyake K, Ohya M, Amano H, Izawa Y, Kanazawa T, Kubo S, Ichinohe T, Hyoudou Y, Hayakawa Y, Sabbah MMH, Otsuru S, Hasegawa D, Habara S, Tanaka H, Fuku Y, Katoh H, Goto T, Mitsudo K. Association between tissue characteristics assessed with optical coherence tomography and mid-term results after percutaneous coronary intervention for in-stent restenosis lesions: a comparison between balloon angioplasty, paclitaxel-coated balloon dilatation, and drug-eluting stent implantation. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2015; 16:1101-11. [DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jev031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2014] [Accepted: 02/04/2015] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
|
46
|
Histopathological heterogeneity of in-stent restenosis in four coronary endarterectomy specimens. Cardiovasc Pathol 2014; 24:194-7. [PMID: 25483741 DOI: 10.1016/j.carpath.2014.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2014] [Revised: 11/05/2014] [Accepted: 11/05/2014] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Here, we histopathologically compare four patients undergoing coronary artery bypass with coronary endarterectomy and onlay patch grafting for in-stent restenosis (ISR) after the implantation of a bare-metal stent (BMS), sirolimus-eluting stent (SES), or paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) in an everolimus-eluting stent (EES). Heterogeneity of ISR was noted histopathologically. In ISR for BMS, restenosis is likely caused by so-called neoatherosclerosis that occurred which altered the healing process of BMS implantation. Two ISR cases for SES showed a histopathological heterogeneity: one showed nodular calcified thrombus around stent strut protruding into the lumen, and the other showed concentric neointima composed of CD68-positive foam cell proliferation. In the ISR lesion for PES in EES, infiltrations with foam cells macrophages, particularly numerous eosinophilic cell infiltrations, suggest a peristent strut hypersensitivity reaction. We found a remarkable histopathological heterogeneity of ISR. The study using coronary endarterectomy specimens can give us pivotal information about the histopathological heterogeneity of ISR.
Collapse
|
47
|
Alfonso F, Sandoval J, Pérez-Vizcayno MJ, Cárdenas A, Gonzalo N, Jiménez-Quevedo P, Ibáñez B, Núñez-Gil I, Rivero F, Escaned J, Fernández-Ortíz A, Macaya C. Mechanisms of balloon angioplasty and repeat stenting in patients with drug-eluting in-stent restenosis. Int J Cardiol 2014; 178:213-20. [PMID: 25464257 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.10.139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2014] [Revised: 08/17/2014] [Accepted: 10/18/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mechanisms of lumen gain during reinterventions in patients with drug-eluting stent (DES) in-stent restenosis (ISR) remain unsettled. METHODS We sought to assess the mechanisms of acute lumen gain after balloon angioplasty (BA) and repeat drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in patients with DES-ISR. Following a prospective protocol 29 consecutive patients with DES-ISR were sequentially treated with BA and new DES implantation under a multimodality intracoronary imaging assessment including intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT). Imaging studies were systematically obtained, at baseline, after BA, and after DES. Results of interventions were compared using volumetric and morphometric (ISR pattern and injury score) analyses. RESULTS IVUS and OCT demonstrated that acute lumen gain after BA and DES equally results from a reduction in intra-stent neointimal volume and further DES expansion. As compared with BA, repeat DES implantation not only increased final lumen (baseline 39.6±18.5mm(3), post-BA 58.6±26.6mm(3), post-DES 84.2±30.8mm(3), all p<0.001) but also provided a smoother lumen (injury score 1.57±0.86 vs 0.22±0.26, p<0.001). At the 9th month of angiographic follow-up (86% patients) in-stent late loss was 0.44±0.5mm and 4 patients (16%) developed ISR. The ISR pattern on OCT was not associated with the injury score after interventions or late angiographic findings. Likewise, the injury score did not predict late angiographic outcome. CONCLUSIONS In patients with DES ISR, lumen gain equally results from a reduction in intra-stent neointimal volume and further DES expansion. As compared with BA, repeat DES implantation provides a larger and smoother coronary lumen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Borja Ibáñez
- Hospital Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Toelg R, Merkely B, Erglis A, Hoffman S, Bruno H, Kornowski R, Slagboom T, Naber C, Witzenbichler B, Graf K, Richardt G, Hehrlein C. Coronary artery treatment with paclitaxel-coated balloon using a BTHC excipient: clinical results of the international real-world DELUX registry. EUROINTERVENTION 2014; 10:591-9. [DOI: 10.4244/eijv10i5a102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
49
|
Byrne RA, Joner M, Alfonso F, Kastrati A. Drug-coated balloon therapy in coronary and peripheral artery disease. Nat Rev Cardiol 2013; 11:13-23. [DOI: 10.1038/nrcardio.2013.165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 144] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
|
50
|
Alfonso F, Scheller B. Management of recurrent in-stent restenosis: onion skin full metal jacket? EUROINTERVENTION 2013; 9:781-5. [DOI: 10.4244/eijv9i7a129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|