Comparison of gender-specific mortality in patients < 70 years versus ≥ 70 years old with acute myocardial infarction

Timely treatment for acute myocardial infarction and health outcomes: an integrative review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Coronary heart disease is the most common condition affecting Australians. The time sensitive nature of treating ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has been the subject of extensive research for several years. Despite important advances in strategies to reduce time to treatment, time continues to represent a major determinant of mortality and morbidity. Door to balloon time (DTBT) is a key indicator of quality of care for STEMI. Nurses play a pivotal role in streamlining the care processes to influence timely management of STEMI.

PURPOSE

The aim of this paper is to review the evidence on the time to treat STEMI, the associated factors impacting upon health outcomes and explore systems of care that reduce time to treatment, using an integrative review approach.

METHOD

Established databases were searched from 2000 to 2012. The search terms 'myocardial infarction', 'emergency medicine', 'angioplasty balloon', 'time factors', 'treatment outcome', 'mortality', 'prognosis', 'female', 'age factors', and 'readmission', were used in various combinations. Research studies that addressed the aims of this paper were examined.

FINDINGS

Twenty-nine papers were included in this integrative review. The literature demonstrates a strong relationship between shorter DTBT and reduced in-hospital mortality. Factors such as age, gender, time of presentation and co-morbid condition were associated with increased in-hospital mortality. There is sparse literature examining the effect timely reperfusion has on longer-term mortality and other longer-term outcomes such as readmission rates and occurrence of heart failure. Additionally, strategies that effectively reduced DTBT were identified, yet little has been reported on the impact reduced DTBT has had upon health outcomes and whether these improvements were sustained.

CONCLUSION

Whilst the importance of timely reperfusion is now well recognised, additional efforts to streamline the process of care and demonstrate sustained improvement for STEMI patients is required. Nurses in the areas of emergency medicine and cardiac care, play an essential role in facilitating this.

Sex-based differences in clinical features, management, and 28-day and 7-year prognosis of first acute myocardial infarction. RESCATE II study

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

To analyze sex-based differences in clinical characteristics, management, and 28-day and 7-year prognosis after a first myocardial infarction.

METHODS

Between 2001 and 2003, 2042 first myocardial infarction patients were consecutively registered in 6 Spanish hospitals. Clinical characteristics, management, and 28-day case-fatality were prospectively recorded. Seven-year vital status was also ascertained by data linkage with the National Mortality Index.

RESULTS

The registry included 449 women and 1593 men with a first myocardial infarction. Compared with men, women were older, had a higher prevalence of hypertension and diabetes, and were more likely to receive angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors but were less likely to receive beta-blockers or thrombolysis. No differences were observed in use of invasive procedures. More women had non-ST-segment elevation and unclassified myocardial infarction than men (37.9% vs 31.3% and 9.8% vs 6.1%, respectively; both P<.001). Case-fatality at 28 days was similar in women and men (5.57% vs 4.46%; P=.39). After multivariate adjustment, the odds ratio of 28-day mortality for men was 1.06 (95% confidence interval: 0.49-2.27; P=.883) compared with women. After multivariate adjustment, men had higher 7-year mortality than women, hazard ratio 1.93 (95% confidence interval: 1.46-2.56; P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

There are demographic and clinical differences between men and women with a first myocardial infarction. The short-term prognosis of a first myocardial infarction in this century is similar in both sexes. However, the long-term vital prognosis after a first myocardial infarction is worse in men than in women. These results are observed in both ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction events.

Comparison of hospital mortality during ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the era of reperfusion therapy in women versus men and in older versus younger patients

There is intense interest in examining hospital mortality in relation to gender in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. The aim of the present study was to determine whether gender influences outcomes in men and women treated with the same patency-oriented reperfusion strategy. The influence of gender on hospital mortality was tested using multivariate analysis and local regression. The influence of age was tested as a continuous and as a categorical variable. In the overall population of 2,600 consecutive patients, gender was not correlated with hospital mortality except in the subgroup of women aged ≥65 years. The risk for death increased linearly in logit scale for men. Up to the age of 65 years, the risk also increased linearly in women but thereafter increased faster than in men. Testing age as a categorical variable, hospital mortality was higher in women than in men aged ≥75 years but was similar between the genders in the younger age categories. In conclusion, despite following an equal patency-oriented management strategy in men and women with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions, the risk for hospital death increased linearly with age but with an interaction between age and gender such that older women had an independent increase in hospital mortality. Longer time to presentation and worse baseline characteristics probably contributed to determine a high-risk subset but reinforce the need to apply, as recommended in the international guidelines in the management of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions, the same strategy of acute reperfusion in men and women.

Age-related treatment strategy and long-term outcome in acute myocardial infarction patients in the PCI era

Background

Older age, as a factor we cannot affect, is consistently one of the main negative prognostic values in patients with acute myocardial infarction. One of the most powerful factors that improves outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes is the revascularization preferably performed by percutaneous coronary intervention. No data is currently available for the role of age in large groups of consecutive patients with PCI as the nearly sole method of revascularization in AMI patients. The aim of this study was to analyze age-related differences in treatment strategies, results of PCI procedures and both in-hospital and long-term outcomes of consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Methods

Retrospective multicenter analysis of 3814 consecutive acute myocardial infarction patients divided into two groups according to age (1800 patients ≤ 65 years and 2014 patients > 65 years). Significantly more older patients had a history of diabetes mellitus and previous myocardial infarctions.

Results

The older population had a significantly lower rate of coronary angiographies (1726; 95.9% vs. 1860; 92.4%, p < 0.0001), PCI (1541; 85.6% vs. 1505; 74.7%, p < 0.001), achievement of optimal final TIMI flow 3 (1434; 79.7% vs. 1343; 66.7%, p < 0.001) and higher rate of unsuccessful reperfusion with final TIMI flow 0-1 (46; 2.6% vs. 78; 3.9%, p = 0.022). A total of 217 patients (5.7%) died during hospitalization, significantly more often in the older population (46; 2.6% vs. 171; 8.5%, p < 0.001). The long-term mortality (data for 2847 patients from 2 centers) was higher in the older population as well (5 years survival: 86.1% vs. 59.8%). Though not significantly different and in contrast with PCI, the presence of diabetes mellitus, previous MI, final TIMI flow and LAD, as the infarct-related artery, had relatively lower impact on the older patients. Severe heart failure on admission (Killip III-IV) was associated with the worst prognosis in the whole group of patients, though its significance was higher in the youngers (HR 6.04 vs. 3.14, p = 0.051 for Killip III and 12.24 vs. 5.65, p = 0.030 for Killip IV). We clearly demonstrated age as a strong discriminator for the whole population of AMI patients.

Conclusions

In a consecutive AMI population, the older group (>65 years) was associated with a less pronounced impact of risk factors on long-term outcome. To ascertain the coronary anatomy by coronary angiography and proceed to PCI if suitable regardless of age is crucial in all patients, though the primary success rate of PCI in the older age is lower. Age, when viewed as a risk factor, was a dominant discriminating factor in all patients.