Characteristics and outcomes of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction excluded from the harmonizing outcomes with revascularization and stents in acute myocardial infarction (HORIZONS-AMI) trial

Comparison between patients included in randomized controlled trials of ischemic heart disease and real-world data. A nationwide study

BACKGROUND

The objective was to compare patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) who were included in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (trial participants) with patients who were not included (nonparticipants) on a trial-by-trial basis and according to indication for PCI.

METHODS

In this cohort study, we compared patients with IHD who were randomized in RCTs in relation to undergoing PCI in Denmark between 2011 and 2015 were considered as RCT-participants in this study. The RCT-participants were compared with contemporary nonparticipants with IHD undergoing PCI in the same period, and they were identified using unselected national registry data. The primary end point was all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 10,317 (30%) patients were included in 10 relevant RCTs (trial participants), and a total of 23,644 (70%) contemporary patients did not participate (nonparticipants). In all the included RCTs, nonparticipants had higher hazard ratios for mortality compared to trial participants (P < .001). Among all patients treated with PCI, the pooled estimates showed a significantly higher mortality rate for nonparticipants compared to trial participants (hazard ratio: 2.03, 95% CI: 1.88-2.19) (P < .001). When patients were stratified according to indication for PCI, the pooled estimates showed a significantly lower mortality rate for trial participants compared to nonparticipants in all strata (P for all < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Trial participants in recently performed RCTs including patients undergoing PCI were not representative of the general population of patients with IHD treated with PCI according to clinical characteristics and mortality. The difference in mortality was found irrespective of the indication for PCI. Thus, results from RCTs including patients undergoing PCI should be extrapolated with caution to the general patient population.

Aldosterone and renin in cardiac patients referred for catheterization

Little is known regarding alterations of the renin-angiotensin system in patients referred for cardiac catheterization. Here, we measured plasma levels of active renin and aldosterone in patients referred for cardiac catheterization in order to determine the prevalence of elevated renin, aldosterone, and the aldosterone-renin ratio.A chemiluminescence assay was used to measure plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) and active renin levels in 833 consecutive patients, after an overnight fasting and without any medication for least 12 hours. We evaluated associations of the hormonal elevations in relation to hypertension, atrial fibrillation (AF), hypertensive cardiomyopathy, coronary artery disease (CAD), valvular disease, impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF < 35%), and pulmonary hypertension (arterial pulmonary mean pressure >25 mm Hg).Hyperaldosteronism occurred in around one-third of all examined patients, without significant differences between patients with or without the named cardiac diseases. In a comparison between patients with or without any given cardiac disease condition, renin was significantly elevated in patients with either hypertension (36.4% vs 15.9%), CAD (33.9% vs 22.1%), or impaired LVEF (47.3% vs 24.8%). The angiotensin-renin ratio was elevated in AF patients and in patients with hypertensive cardiomyopathy. Patients with AF and coexisting hypertension had elevated renin more frequently than AF patients without coexisting hypertension (35.3% vs 16.5%; P  =  .005). Patients with persistent/permanent AF more frequently had elevated renin than patients with paroxysmal AF (34.1% vs 15.8%; P  =  .007).This prospective study of consecutive cardiac disease patients referred for cardiac catheterization has revealed distinct cardiac disease condition-associated differences in the frequencies of elevations in plasma renin, PAC, and the aldosterone-renin ratio.

Thrombus aspiration for reperfusion in myocardial infarction: Predictors and clinical impact of ineffectiveness

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

The benefit of manual thrombus aspiration (TA) in the reperfusion of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has been hotly debated. In most series, failure of TA has been largely unreported. Our objectives were to assess the rate, predictors, and impact on cumulative mortality of failed TA during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI).

METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective study of consecutive STEMI patients undergoing PPCI with TA. TA was considered ineffective if, before angioplasty, coronary flow was TIMI <2. Independent predictors of TA failure were assessed by logistic regression, and predictors of cumulative mortality were assessed by Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Of 574 patients, TA was used in 417 (72.6%), and was effective in 365 (87.5%) and ineffective in 52 (12.5%). On multivariate analysis, SYNTAX score (OR=1.049, 95% CI: 1.015-1.084, p=0.005) and total ischemic time (OR=1.001, 95% CI: 1.000-1.003, p=0.02) were independent predictors of TA failure. Moderate or severe left ventricular dysfunction (HR=6.256, 95% CI: 1.896-20.644, p=0.003), APPROACH score (HR=1.094, 95% CI: 1.016-1.177, p=0.017), Killip class III/IV (HR=2.953, 95% CI: 1.122-7.770, p=0.028) and creatinine clearance on admission (HR=0.973, 95% CI: 0.953-0.994, p=0.011) were independently related to cumulative mortality at 24 ± 0.82 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Total ischemic time and SYNTAX score were independent predictors of TA failure. However, in medium-term follow-up, ineffective manual TA was not independently related to cumulative mortality.

Rate-control versus rhythm-control strategies and outcomes in septuagenarians with atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of atrial fibrillation substantially increases after 70 years of age. However, the effect of rate-control versus rhythm-control strategies on outcomes in these patients remains unclear.

METHODS

In the randomized Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) trial, 4060 patients (mean age 70 years, range 49-80 years) with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation were randomized to rate-control versus rhythm-control strategies. Of these, 2248 were 70-80 years, of whom 1118 were in the rate-control group. Propensity scores for rate-control strategy were estimated for each of the 2248 patients and were used to assemble a cohort of 937 pairs of patients receiving rate-control versus rhythm-control strategies, balanced on 45 baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

Matched patients had a mean age of 75 years; 45% were women, 7% were nonwhite, and 47% had prior hospitalizations due to arrhythmias. During 3.4 years of mean follow-up, all-cause mortality occurred in 18% and 23% of matched patients in the rate-control and rhythm-control groups, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] associated with rate control, 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63-0.94; P = .010). HRs (95% CIs) for cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortality associated with rate control were 0.88 (0.65-1.18) and 0.62 (0.46-0.84), respectively. All-cause hospitalization occurred in 61% and 68% of rate-control and rhythm-control patients, respectively (HR 0.76; 95% CI, 0.68-0.86). HRs (95% CIs) for cardiovascular and noncardiovascular hospitalization were 0.66 (0.56-0.77) and 1.07 (0.91-1.27), respectively.

CONCLUSION

In septuagenarian patients with atrial fibrillation, compared with rhythm-control, a rate-control strategy was associated with significantly lower mortality and hospitalization.