Early trends in N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide values after left ventricular assist device implantation for chronic heart failure

Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms Activated by a Left Ventricular Assist Device

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) represent the final treatment for patients with end-stage heart failure (HF) not eligible for transplantation. Although LVAD design has been further improved in the last decade, their use is associated with different complications. Specifically, inflammation, fibrosis, bleeding events, right ventricular failure, and aortic valve regurgitation may occur. In addition, reverse remodeling is associated with substantial cellular and molecular changes of the failing myocardium during LVAD support with positive effects on patients' health. All these processes also lead to the identification of biomarkers identifying LVAD patients as having an augmented risk of developing associated adverse events, thus highlighting the possibility of identifying new therapeutic targets. Additionally, it has been reported that LVAD complications could cause or exacerbate a state of malnutrition, suggesting that, with an adjustment in nutrition, the general health of these patients could be improved.

An update on utilising brain natriuretic peptide for risk stratification, monitoring and guiding therapy in heart failure

INTRODUCTION

Heart failure (HF) is a dominant health problem with an overall poor prognosis. Natriuretic peptides (NPs) are upregulated in HF as a compensatory mechanism. They have extensively been used for diagnosis and risk stratification.

AREAS COVERED

This review addresses the history and physiology of NPs in order to understand their current role in clinical practice. It further provides a detailed and updated narrative review on the utility of those biomarkers for risk stratification, monitoring, and guiding therapy in HF.

EXPERT OPINION

NPs show excellent predictive ability in heart failure patients, both in acute and chronic settings. Understanding their pathophysiology and their modifications in specific situations is key for an adequate interpretation in specific clinical scenarios in which their prognostic value may be weaker or less well evaluated. To better promote risk stratification in HF, NPs should be integrated with other predictive tools to develop multiparametric risk models. Both inequalities of access to NPs and evidence caveats and limitations will need to be addressed by future research in the coming years.

Relationship Between Preoperative NT-proBNP and Postoperative Adverse Events in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Device

Background:

The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship of preoperative NT-proBNP values with postoperative adverse events in patient left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation.

Method:

Forty-six patients (35 males; mean age 49.4 ± 12.9 years) who underwent LVAD implantation between 2016 and 2018 were evaluated in this study. The analysis was made on the relationship between preoperative NT-proBNP and mortality, postoperative right ventricular failure (RVF), postoperative drainage, duration of intubation, and intensive care unit stay, was examined. The optimal NT-proBNP cut-off values for predicting mortality were determined using Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and the patients were divided into two groups according to the specified cut-off point.

Result:

Median NT-proBNP was higher in patients who died, had postoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and early RVF. The median NT-proBNP was 11,103 pg/ml in patients with IABP, and 2943 pg/ml in patients without IABP, and the difference was statistically significant ( p = 0.002). The cut-off point for NT-proBNP was found to be 1725.5 pg/ml (Sensitivity:0.929, Specificity:0.688). Accordingly, when the patients were divided into two groups and analyzed, no statistically significant difference was found between preoperative NT-proBNP below or above 1725.5 and postoperative adverse events. There was no statistically significant correlation between preoperative NT-proBNP and postoperative drainage, duration of intubation time, and duration of ICU stay ( p > 0.05).

Conclusion:

Routine monitoring of preoperative NT-proBNP and comparison with postoperative values are important in terms of patient selection, the timing of surgery, follow-up of postoperative adverse events, and improving outcomes in VAD patients.

Prognostic Implications of Ambulatory N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Changes in Patients with Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices

Data regarding the role of N-terminal Pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-pro BNP) in patients with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CFLVAD) is scarce. To evaluate the prognostic implications of measuring both absolute values and changes in NT-pro BNP concentrations in ambulatory patients with a CFLVAD, we performed a retrospective study of 168 consecutive patients who had an LVAD implantation at our institution and survived beyond their index hospitalization. Of these, 127 patients (56.2 ± 12.5 years, 21.2% female) had NT-pro BNP measured at 1 and 3 months postdischarge in ambulatory settings. Compared to the NT-pro BNP concentration at 1 month, 94 patients (74%) had a decline, and 33 patients (26%) had an increase in concentrations, from their 1 month baseline. After a median follow-up of 17 months, a total of 53 (41.7%) adverse events occurred. Of these, 37 (69.8%) were heart failure (HF) hospitalizations, and 16 (30.2%) were deaths. For each 1,000 unit increase in NT-pro BNP concentration at 3 months, there was a 17% increase in the risk of HF hospitalization or death (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.04-1.32, p = 0.007). Conversely, each 1000 unit decline during the same time, was associated with an 11% decrease in the risk of HF hospitalization or death (HR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.77-0.98, p = 0.04). In conclusion, in patients with a CFLAD, an increase in NT-pro BNP concentration from 1 to 3 months is associated with an increased risk of HF hospitalization and death. In contrast, a decline is associated with a reduction in the risk of HF hospitalization and death.

Prognostic Value of Natriuretic Peptides for All-Cause Mortality, Right Ventricular Failure, Major Adverse Events, and Myocardial Recovery in Advanced Heart Failure Patients Receiving a Left Ventricular Assist Device: A Systematic Review

Aims: Major adverse event (MAE) rates during left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy in advanced heart failure (HF) patients are high, and impair quality of life and survival. Prediction and risk stratification of MAEs in order to improve patient selection and thereby outcome during LVAD therapy is therefore warranted. Circulating natriuretic peptides (NPs) are strong predictors of MAEs and mortality in chronic HF patients. However, whether NPs can identify patients who are at risk of MAEs and mortality or tend toward myocardial recovery after LVAD implantation is unclear. The aim of this systematic review is to analyze the prognostic value of circulating NP levels before LVAD implantation for all-cause mortality, MAEs and myocardial recovery after LVAD implantation.

Methods and Results: Electronic databases were searched for studies analyzing circulating NP in adults with advanced HF before LVAD implantation in relation to mortality, MAEs, or myocardial recovery after LVAD implantation. Twenty-four studies published between 2008 and 2021 were included. Follow-up duration ranged from 48 hours to 5 years. Study sample size ranged from 14 to 15,138 patients. Natriuretic peptide levels were not predictive of all-cause mortality. However, NPs were predictive of right ventricular failure (RVF) and MAEs such as ventricular arrhythmias, moderate or severe aortic regurgitation, and all-cause rehospitalization. No relation between NPs and myocardial recovery was found.

Conclusion: This systematic review found that NP levels before LVAD implantation are not predictive of all-cause mortality after LVAD implantation. Thus, NP levels may be of limited value in patient selection for LVAD therapy. However, NPs help in risk stratification of MAEs and may be used to identify patients who are at risk for RVF, ventricular arrhythmias, moderate or severe aortic regurgitation, and all-cause rehospitalization after LVAD implantation.

The contribution of cardiac and extracardiac factors to NT-proBNP concentrations in patients with advanced heart failure before and after left ventricular assist device implantation

The clinical significance of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is not fully explored. NT-proBNP concentrations are influenced by body composition, renal function and intracardiac pressures; dynamic measures pre- and post-LVAD implantation. We sought to identify the individual contribution of cardiac and extracardiac factors to NT-proBNP concentrations in advanced heart failure patients before and after LVAD implantation. We retrospectively collected data from 63 patients implanted with a LVAD with NT -proBNP measurements (2006-2019). Hemodynamic measurements were obtained through right heart catheterization (RHC). Univariable linear regression and multivariable stepwise regression models were used to analyze variables associated with NT-proBNP concentrations in the pre- and post-LVAD setting. Paired t-test was performed on a subpopulation of 13 patients with complete data. We found significant differences in all extracardiac (BMI, creatinine, eGFR) and all invasive hemodynamic measurements pre-LVAD compared to post-LVAD. NT-proBNP decreased by 83 %, in the subpopulation of 13 patients: 736 pmol/L [IQR 498-1330] to 126 pmol/L [IQR 74.8-241.7]. In multivariable analysis, only creatinine remained significantly associated with NT-proBNP before LVAD implant (p = 0.016), whereas pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) was the only independent variable associated with NT-proBNP after LVAD implant (p < 0.0001). Creatinine and PCWP were the only independent factors associated with NT-proBNP concentrations before and after LVAD implantation, respectively. Invasive hemodynamic measurements were more closely associated with NT-proBNP concentration after LVAD than extracardiac factors and reversely pre-LVAD, suggesting that NT-proBNP serves as a useful biomarker of cardiac conditions post-LVAD implantation.

Dynamics and prognostic value of B-type natriuretic peptide in left ventricular assist device recipients

Background

The prognostic utility of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) in heart failure is well recognized. Previous studies demonstrated that BNP levels decrease after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. We sought to investigate the predictive value of baseline and changes in BNP levels in LVAD recipients.

Methods

BNP was measured in baseline and follow-up plasma samples from consecutive patients receiving a continuous-flow LVAD from 2010 through 2016. Absolute values and changes from baseline were related to clinical outcomes.

Results

Median BNP at baseline was 885 [interquartile range (IQR): 450-1,624] pg/mL, decreasing to 289 (IQR: 154-534) pg/mL at 90 days after LVAD implantation. Cox regression analysis revealed that higher baseline and follow-up BNP levels were not associated with increased risk of death at 180 days (P=0.12 and P=0.32, respectively). In the univariate analysis 90-day BNP, but not baseline BNP, was significantly associated with the combined death/hospitalization outcome 180 days after LVAD implantation [hazard ratio (HR) 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.06; P=0.006]. This significance was not preserved after adjusting for multiple covariates (HR 1.01, 95% CI: 0.98-1.04; P=0.62). At 90 days, there was no BNP lowering in 20.6% of subjects. This was not associated with higher risk for death or the composite of death/hospitalization (P=0.11 and P=0.06 respectively).

Conclusions

BNP absolute levels and changes from baseline are not independently associated with clinical outcomes after LVAD-implantation. These findings suggest an impaired prognostic performance of BNP after LVAD implantation.

Outcome of conservative management vs. assist device implantation in patients with advanced refractory heart failure

BACKGROUND

In patients with advanced refractory heart failure (HF) cardiac transplantation (HTX), conservative medical management and the implantation of a ventricular assist device (VAD) represent valuable options. The determination of the best therapeutic destination strategy for the individual patient remains a challenge. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical outcome in advanced refractory HF patients either managed conservatively receiving optimal contemporary medical therapy ('conservative'), or who who underwent pulsatile flow VAD ('pVAD') or continuous-flow VAD ('contVAD') implantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 118 patients with INTERMACS profile >1 at baseline, who died, or fully completed a 24-month follow-up free from HTX were included into this retrospective analysis. All-cause mortality at 24 months was assessed and compared between the three groups.

RESULTS

Fifty (42%) patients were managed conservatively, 25 (21%) received a pVAD and 43 (36%) a contVAD. NT-proBNP values were comparable between the three groups (median 4402 (IQR 2730-13390) pg/mL, 3580 (1602-6312) pg/mL and 3693 (2679-8065) pg/mL, P = 0·256). Mean survival was 18·6 (95% CI 16·2-21·0) months for patients managed conservatively, 7·0 (3·9-10·0) for pVAD and 20·5 (18·2-22·8) for contVAD (overall log-rank test P < 0·001). Conservatively managed patients spent a mean of 22·4 (95% CI 22·1-22·8), pVAD 17·7 (15·4-20·1) and contVAD 21·6 (21·2-22·1) months out of hospital (conservative vs. pVAD P < 0·001; conservative vs. contVAD P = 0·015; pVAD vs. contVAD P < 0·001).

CONCLUSIONS

In accordance with the literature, contVAD resulted in a significantly better clinical outcome than pVAD implantation. However, conservative management with current optimal medical therapy appears to remain a valuable option for patients with advanced HF.