Trends in Vascular Complications in High-Risk Patients Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in the United States

Prognostic benefits of early vascular surgical intervention in patients with major peripheral vascular complications following transcatheter aortic valve implantation

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to analyze the incidence, surgical management of major vascular complications, and outcomes in patients undergoing transfemoral (TF) transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) at our center after strict selection of the access route, carefully considering all known major predictors.

METHODS

Data of 494 consecutive patients with pre-interventional multi-slice computed tomography (CT) of the aorta who had undergone TF TAVR from 2009 to 2019 were analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 23/494 (4.7%) patients had major vascular and access-related complications of peripheral vessels and/or infrarenal aorta. These included hematomas that met the Valve Academic Research Consortium 3-criteria of major vascular complications (7/494, 1.4%), arterial dissections (3/494, 0.6%), pseudoaneurysm (6/494, 1.2%), thrombus of the external iliac artery leading to acute limb ischemia (1/494, 0.2%), fistula (1/494, 0.2%), and perforation (5/494, 1.0%). In total, 17/23 (73.9%) major vascular complications required immediate endovascular and/or open surgery. In 16/17 (94%) cases, only 1 surgical procedure was performed. The long-term survival of patients with and without major vascular complications of the peripheral vessels was determined after 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Early vascular surgery intervention reversed the mortality disadvantage in patients with major complications of the peripheral vessels after TAVR. This underscores the importance of immediate vascular surgery stand-by as an indispensable requirement.

Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Protamine in Reducing Bleeding Complications during TAVI: A Propensity-Matched Comparison

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of low-dose protamine in reducing access site-related complications during Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) as compared to full-dose protamine.

BACKGROUND

Access site-related complications represent an independent predictor of poor outcomes of TAVI. Data regarding heparin reversal with protamine and the dosage needed to prevent bleeding complications are scarce among patients undergoing TAVI.

METHODS

A total of 897 patients were retrospectively included in the study. Patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention within 4 weeks before or concomitantly with TAVI (n = 191) were given 0.5 mg protamine for each 100 units of unfractionated heparin. All other patients (n = 706) were considered as a control group and 1 mg protamine for each 100 units of heparin was administered.

RESULTS

The combined intra-hospital endpoint of death, life-threatening major bleeding, and major vascular complications were significantly more frequent in patients receiving low-dose protamine [29 (15.2%) vs. 50 (7.1%), p < 0.001]. After propensity matching (n = 130 for each group) for relevant clinical characteristics including anti-platelet therapy [19 (14.6%) vs. 6 (4.6%), p = 0.006], low-dose protamine predicted the combined endpoint (OR 3.54, 95%-CI 1.36-9.17, p = 0.009), and even in multivariable analysis, low-dose protamine continued to be a predictor of the combined endpoint in the matched model (OR 3.07, 95%-CI 1.17-8.08, p = 0.023) alongside baseline hemoglobin.

CONCLUSIONS

In this propensity-matched retrospective analysis, a low-dose protamine regime is associated with a higher rate of major adverse events compared to a full-dose protamine regime following transfemoral TAVI.

Advancements in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Focused Update

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become the leading technique for aortic valve replacement in symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis with conventional surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) now limited to patients younger than 65-75 years due to a combination of unsuitable anatomies (calcified raphae in bicuspid valves, coexistent aneurysm of the ascending aorta) and concerns on the absence of long-term data on TAVI durability. This incredible rise is linked to technological evolutions combined with increased operator experience, which led to procedural refinements and, accordingly, to better outcomes. The article describes the main and newest technical improvements, allowing an extension of the indications (valve-in-valve procedures, intravascular lithotripsy for severely calcified iliac vessels), and a reduction of complications (stroke, pacemaker implantation, aortic regurgitation).

Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: updated endpoint definitions for aortic valve clinical research

Aims 

The Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC), founded in 2010, was intended to (i) identify appropriate clinical endpoints and (ii) standardize definitions of these endpoints for transcatheter and surgical aortic valve clinical trials. Rapid evolution of the field, including the emergence of new complications, expanding clinical indications, and novel therapy strategies have mandated further refinement and expansion of these definitions to ensure clinical relevance. This document provides an update of the most appropriate clinical endpoint definitions to be used in the conduct of transcatheter and surgical aortic valve clinical research.

Methods and results 

Several years after the publication of the VARC-2 manuscript, an in-person meeting was held involving over 50 independent clinical experts representing several professional societies, academic research organizations, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and industry representatives to (i) evaluate utilization of VARC endpoint definitions in clinical research, (ii) discuss the scope of this focused update, and (iii) review and revise specific clinical endpoint definitions. A writing committee of independent experts was convened and subsequently met to further address outstanding issues. There were ongoing discussions with FDA and many experts to develop a new classification schema for bioprosthetic valve dysfunction and failure. Overall, this multi-disciplinary process has resulted in important recommendations for data reporting, clinical research methods, and updated endpoint definitions. New definitions or modifications of existing definitions are being proposed for repeat hospitalizations, access site-related complications, bleeding events, conduction disturbances, cardiac structural complications, and bioprosthetic valve dysfunction and failure (including valve leaflet thickening and thrombosis). A more granular 5-class grading scheme for paravalvular regurgitation (PVR) is being proposed to help refine the assessment of PVR. Finally, more specific recommendations on quality-of-life assessments have been included, which have been targeted to specific clinical study designs.

Conclusions 

Acknowledging the dynamic and evolving nature of less-invasive aortic valve therapies, further refinements of clinical research processes are required. The adoption of these updated and newly proposed VARC-3 endpoints and definitions will ensure homogenous event reporting, accurate adjudication, and appropriate comparisons of clinical research studies involving devices and new therapeutic strategies.

Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: Updated Endpoint Definitions for Aortic Valve Clinical Research

AIMS

The Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC), founded in 2010, was intended to (i) identify appropriate clinical endpoints and (ii) standardize definitions of these endpoints for transcatheter and surgical aortic valve clinical trials. Rapid evolution of the field, including the emergence of new complications, expanding clinical indications, and novel therapy strategies have mandated further refinement and expansion of these definitions to ensure clinical relevance. This document provides an update of the most appropriate clinical endpoint definitions to be used in the conduct of transcatheter and surgical aortic valve clinical research.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Several years after the publication of the VARC-2 manuscript, an in-person meeting was held involving over 50 independent clinical experts representing several professional societies, academic research organizations, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and industry representatives to (i) evaluate utilization of VARC endpoint definitions in clinical research, (ii) discuss the scope of this focused update, and (iii) review and revise specific clinical endpoint definitions. A writing committee of independent experts was convened and subsequently met to further address outstanding issues. There were ongoing discussions with FDA and many experts to develop a new classification schema for bioprosthetic valve dysfunction and failure. Overall, this multi-disciplinary process has resulted in important recommendations for data reporting, clinical research methods, and updated endpoint definitions. New definitions or modifications of existing definitions are being proposed for repeat hospitalizations, access site-related complications, bleeding events, conduction disturbances, cardiac structural complications, and bioprosthetic valve dysfunction and failure (including valve leaflet thickening and thrombosis). A more granular 5-class grading scheme for paravalvular regurgitation (PVR) is being proposed to help refine the assessment of PVR. Finally, more specific recommendations on quality-of-life assessments have been included, which have been targeted to specific clinical study designs.

CONCLUSIONS

Acknowledging the dynamic and evolving nature of less-invasive aortic valve therapies, further refinements of clinical research processes are required. The adoption of these updated and newly proposed VARC-3 endpoints and definitions will ensure homogenous event reporting, accurate adjudication, and appropriate comparisons of clinical research studies involving devices and new therapeutic strategies.

Covered Stents as a First-Line Treatment for Vascular Access Complications During Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Eight-Year Experience From a Single Center

We report 8-year experience with vascular access complications (VACs) after percutaneous transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). From January 2010 to January 2018, patients with iliofemoral VAC treated by an intervention following percutaneous transfemoral TAVI were included. Major VAC was defined according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium 2 classification. As first-line strategy, VACs were treated using covered nitinol stents (CS). Among 795 percutaneous transfemoral TAVI, 74 (9.3%) patients (female, 57%; 82 ± 8 years) with VAC treated by CS and/or open repair were included in this study: 59 CS cases and 15 open repair cases. Two CS patients were converted to open repair. Technical success for stent implantation was 97%. The main VAC was a persistent bleeding related to percutaneous closure device failure (72%). Thirty-day mortality in the study cohort was 5.4% (4/74), including 1 VAC-related death. One patient had postoperative lower limb ischemia successfully treated by open repair. No amputation, new-onset claudication or in-stent occlusion was recorded. Endovascular intervention using self-expandable nitinol covered stent is safe and effective as a first-line strategy for the treatment of VAC in percutaneous transfemoral TAVI. However, open repair is needed in case of unfeasibility or failure of endovascular therapy.

Safety outcomes of new versus old generation transcatheter aortic valves

OBJECTIVE

To compare procedural outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) patients who were implanted with older versus newer generation valves.

BACKGROUND

The current evidence base for improved safety of the newer commercially available TAVI valves is limited.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the Israeli multicenter TAVI registry was performed. Patients were stratified by valve generation of four commercially available devices: Edwards Sapien (ESX) Edwards Sapien S3 (ES3), Medtronic CoreValve (MCV), and Medtronic Evolut R (MER).

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 737 patients with new generation valves (NGVs; ES3 n = 223; MER n = 514) and 1,869 with old generation valves (OGVs; MCV n = 1,181; ESX n = 688). Device success rates were significantly higher in NGV (97.5 versus 95.4%), with less post-procedural paravalvular leak (3 versus 5.8%), and valve mal-positioning (1.2 versus 3.4%); all P-values<0.05. There were no differences in rates of permanent pacemaker implantation, stroke or acute kidney injury (AKI) of any stage between the groups, although stage ≥2 AKI was more prevalent in NGV. After adjustment to significant differences in baseline patient and procedural characteristics, device success was higher (OR 1.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09-3.18, P = 0.023) and the 1-month safety outcome was significantly lower (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.55-0.96, P = 0.025) for NGV. Device success was driven mainly by improved rates of PVL of ES3, while the safety outcome was mainly driven by improved rates of life-threatening bleeding and valve mal-positioning of MER.

CONCLUSION

As compared to OGV, use of NGV for TAVI was associated with higher rates of device success and lower rates of adverse events.

Comparison of Frequency of Late Gastrointestinal Bleeding With Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement

Improvements in technology and operator experience have led to exponential growth of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) programs. Late bleeding complications were recently highlighted after TAVI with a high impact on morbidity. The purpose of the present study was to assess the incidence and financial impact of late Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding after TAVI, and compare with the surgical cohort. Retrospective analysis of the National Readmissions Database was performed from January 2011 to December 2014, and patients who underwent TAVI or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) were identified. Incidence of readmission with a diagnosis of GI bleeding was utilized as the primary end point. Overall, 43,357 patients were identified who underwent TAVI, whereas 310,013 patients underwent SAVR. Compared with SAVR, TAVI patients were older (81 vs 68y, p < 0.001), more women (48% vs 36%, p < 0.001), and had higher Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (6 vs 5, p < 0.001). Hospital stay was shorter with TAVI (5 vs 8 days, p < 0.001), but raw in-hospital mortality rates were similar (4.2% vs 3.8%, p = 0.022). In the TAVI cohort, 3.3% of patients were rehospitalized for GI bleeding compared with 1.5% of the SAVR cohort (p < 0.001). Average time to bleeding readmission was similar between cohorts (92 vs 84 days, p = 0.049). After multivariable adjustment, TAVI remained significantly associated with readmissions for GI bleeding compared with SAVR Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR 1.54 [1.38 to 1.71], p < 0.001). In this national cohort study, TAVI was associated with more frequent readmissions for late GI bleeding compared with SAVR. In conclusion, strategies to reduce late GI bleeding may serve as important targets for improvement in overall quality of care.

Single versus dual anti-platelet therapy post transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the 30-days safety (bleeding and vascular events) and efficacy (reduction in major stroke, myocardial infarction and mortality) of single anti-platelet (SAPT) versus dual anti-platelet (DAPT) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We used a meta-analytic method with Mantel-Haenszel methods to calculate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Only randomized clinical trials that compared 30-days safety and efficacy based on Valve Academic Research Consortium criteria were included. Studies that included patients on anticoagulants were excluded. Our analysis included three studies with a total of 421 patients (210 SAPT and 211 DAPT). Life-threatening and major bleeding as well as major vascular complications was similar between SAPT and DAPT. Similarly, major stroke, myocardial infarction and mortality was also comparable between the two groups. The combined outcomes of 30-day mortality, life-threatening and major bleeding showed tendency toward lower event rates in SAPT compared to DAPT (9.5 vs. 15.6%, OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.31-1.03, p = 0.06). In conclusion, SAPT provided similar safety without adding incremental efficacy compared to DAPT but showed tendency of lower combined endpoints of 30-day mortality, life-threatening and major bleeding.

A 7-Year Single-Center Experience of Transfemoral TAVI: Evolution of Surgical Activity and Impact on Vascular Outcome

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become a well-established alternative to open surgery to treat aortic stenosis. We describe our 7-year TAVI experience using transfemoral access and identity changes in surgical activity and evaluate its impact on postoperative vascular outcomes. Consecutive patients (N = 340) who underwent TAVI with percutaneous transfemoral access were retrospectively included and divided into 4 quartiles according to the date of intervention. Vascular outcomes were classified according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium 2 classification. The number of patients who underwent transfemoral TAVI increased over time and their clinical characteristics evolved, with a lower Society of Thoracic Surgeons score and less comorbidities. The material used evolved and TAVI could be performed despite higher iliac calcification and tortuosity scores. With experience, the procedural time, the postoperative length of stay at hospital, and the 30-day postoperative mortality significantly decreased. No significant change was observed for vascular outcome, except for minor hematoma. We witnessed an increase in transfemoral TAVI procedure, with changes in clinical and procedural characteristics associated with an improvement in postoperative outcomes.