Comparison of Long-Term Mortality in Patients With Previous Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Who Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Versus Without Optimal Medical Therapy

Outcomes of patients with cerebral microbleeds undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and dual antiplatelet therapy

INTRODUCTION

Cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are predictive of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). However, the risk of ICH in patients with CMBs who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) while receiving dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a study on 329 consecutive patients with coronary artery disease who underwent PCI and were evaluated using a 3T MRI scanner. Based on T2*-weighted imaging, patients were classified into three groups: no CMBs, < 5 CMBs, or ≥ 5 CMBs. We determined the occurrence of ICH during follow-up.

RESULTS

At least 1 CMB was found in 109 (33%) patients. The mean number of CMBs per patient was 2.9 ± 3.6. Among the 109 patients with CMBs, 16 (15%) had ≥ 5 CMBs. Coronary stent implantation was performed in 321 patients (98%). DAPT was prescribed for 325 patients (99%). During a mean follow-up period of 2.3 years (interquartile range, 1.9-2.5 years), ICH occurred in one patient (1.1%) with four CMBs. There were no significant differences in the incidence of ICH (0% vs. 1.1% vs. 0%; p = 0.28). However, the rate of DAPT at 6 months of follow-up was significantly lower in patients with ≥ 5 CMBs than in patients with no CMBs or < 5 CMBs (89% vs. 91% vs. 66%, p = 0.026). Furthermore, there were no significant differences in systemic blood pressure during follow-up (123 ± 16 vs. 125 ± 16 vs. 118 ± 11 mmHg; p = 0.40).

CONCLUSION

Although a substantial number of patients who underwent PCI had cerebral microbleeds, at approximately two years of follow-up, intracerebral hemorrhage was very rare in our study population.

Comparing patient outcomes following minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting surgery vs. coronary artery bypass grafting: a single-center retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

This present research was designed for comparing coronary artery disease (CAD) patient outcomes following minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (MICS) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

METHODS

From 2014-2017, 679 CAD patients underwent MICS (n=281) or CABG (n=398) and were evaluated for the present study. Patient data were analyzed using 1:1 propensity score-matched assessment and a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model, and primary study achievements comprised major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), myocardial infarction (MI), cardiac death, heart failure (HF), revascularization, and stroke. The median follow-up period was 2.68 years.

RESULTS

CABG patients exhibited a trend towards higher cumulative overall rates of MACCEs at 2 years (CABG: 6.2% vs. MICS: 3.8%) and 4 years (CABG: 9.3% vs. MICS: 7.6%) [adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 1.33; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.33-5.39 for CABG vs. MICS; P=0.687], although this difference was not significant. No significant differences in 2- or 4-year cardiac death rates were observed between groups (CABG: 3.5%, 5.6% vs. MICS 2.8%, 2.8%; adjusted HR: 0.23; 95% CI: 0.03-1.81 for CABG vs. MICS; P=0.160). Further, there existed no discrepancies in rates of MI (P=1.000), HF (adjusted HR: 4.76; 95% CI: 0.01-6.40 for CABG vs. MICS; P=0.996), stroke (adjusted HR: 9.58; 95% CI: 0.11-25.24 for CABG vs. MICS; P=0.320), or repeated revascularization (adjusted HR: 1.71; 95% CI: 0.01-7.21 for CABG vs. MICS; P=0.631) when comparing these patient groups. In a multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, patients that were male (adjusted HR: 5.28; 95% CI: 1.48-18.83; P=0.010) and cases with a history of previous MI epsiodes (adjusted HR: 3.20; 95% CI: 1.09-9.37; P=0.034) were found to be at a higher risk of MACCEs.

CONCLUSIONS

Follow-up data indicated that the MICS and CABG treatments could achieve similar outcomes.

Percutaneous coronary intervention in diabetic versus non-diabetic patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting: a propensity score matching study

BACKGROUND

The target of this study was to explore the outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in diabetic versus non-diabetic patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery.

METHODS

Seven hundred and twenty four patients who had previously received CABG and had been treated using PCI combined with drug-eluting stents (DES) between 2009 and 2017 were selected for a retrospective study and allocated into either a diabetes mellitus (DM) or non-diabetes mellitus (No DM) group. A 1:1 propensity score-matched evaluation was conducted and risk adjusted for analysis. The primary outcomes were cardiac death, myocardial infarction, heart failure and revascularization, with a median follow-up duration of 5.13 years.

RESULTS

After matching, two-, 5- and 8-year event rate of overall major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) were found to be higher in the DM group (No DM vs DM:15.3, 30.9, 38.5% vs 19.8, 37.8, 52.2%, respectively), although no significant difference was found in the event rate of overall MACEs (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.35; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00 to 1.83 for DM vs No DM; P = 0.052), cardiac death (HR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.45 to 1.95; P = 0.871), MI (HR: 1.49; 95% CI: 0.95 to 2.32; P = 0.080), HF (HR: 1.54; 95% CI: 0.90 to 2.63 for; P = 0.120) or revascularization (HR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.72 to 1.59; P = 0.747). Subgroup analysis of PCI in only the NCA showed MACEs (adjusted HR: 1.13; 95% CI: 0.85 to 1.49 for DM vs No DM; P = 0.325), cardiac death (adjusted HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.41 to 1.78 for DM vs No DM; P = 0.781), MI (adjusted HR: 1.32; 95% CI: 0.84 to 2.01 for DM vs No DM; P = 0.069), HF (adjusted HR: 1.41; 95% CI: 0.87 to 2.27 for DM vs No DM; P = 0.211) or repeated revascularization (adjusted HR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.64 to 1.37 for DM vs No DM; P = 0.836).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with non-diabetic patients with prior CABG, subsequent implantation of DES in the native coronary artery of diabetic patients resulted in apparently similar outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was not registered in an open access database.

[Clinical Portrait of The Patient before the Planned Percutral Coronary Intervention in Conditions of Real Practice]

Aim To evaluate quality of treatment of patients with stable ischemic heart disease (IHD) prior to an elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).Material and methods The study included 250 patients with stable IHD admitted for an elective PCI. Blood pressure, heart rate, total cholesterol, and blood glucose were measured for patients upon admission.Results Only 50 % of patients admitted to the clinic for elective PCI received optimal medical therapy (OMT); only 5.2 % of all patients achieved goal values of studied risk factors.Conclusion The study detected low compliance of stable IHD patients scheduled for PCI with OMT and achie-ve-ment of goal values for several risk factors.

Coronary Angiography Characteristics of Symptomatic Patients with Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Graft: A Descriptive Study

OBJECTIVES

The target of this study was to explore the coronary angiography characteristics for symptomatic patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).

METHODS

Between 2009 and 2017, 993 patients who had undergone CABG but subsequently suffered recurrent symptoms in Beijing Anzhen Hospital were selected for this study and divided into either medical therapy (MT) group (n = 351) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) group (n = 642) based on the treatment. Clinical data were analyzed between two groups.

RESULTS

Patients in the MT group were older and more likely to have chronic lung disease (6.6% vs 3.4%, P=0.026) while patients in the PCI group were more likely to have prior MI (8.8% vs 17.0%, P < 0.001). In the MT group, 54.4% of patients had newly developed lesions both in the graft and native coronary artery while 58.1% in the PCI group (P=0.003), and in the MT group, 80.6% had type C coronary artery disease while 60.1% in the PCI group (P < 0.001). Patients in the MT group presented higher proportion of diffuse lesions (49.3% vs 15.0%, P < 0.001) in native coronary arteries.

CONCLUSION

Patients receiving MT (35.3%) likely had occluded grafts and type C coronary artery disease featuring as diffuse lesions.