Heart Failure Severity and Quality of Warfarin Anticoagulation Control (From the WARCEF Trial)

Clinical Impact of the Time in Therapeutic Range on Early Hospital Readmission in Patients with Acute Heart Failure Treated with Oral Anticoagulation in Internal Medicine

Background and objectives: Patients with heart failure (HF) often present with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and require oral anticoagulation with coumarin anticoagulants such as acenocoumarol. The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between time in therapeutic range (TTR) and the risk of early readmission. Materials and Methods: A retrospective descriptive study was carried out on hospitalized patients with a diagnosis of HF between 2014 and 2018 who had adverse effects due to oral anticoagulation with acenocoumarol (underdosing, overdosing, or hemorrhage). Clinical, analytical, therapeutic, and prognostic variables were collected. TTR is defined as the duration of time in which the patient’s International Normalized Ratio (INR) values were within a desired range. Early readmission was defined as readmission within 30 days after hospital discharge. Patients were divided into two groups depending on whether or not they had a TTR less than 60% (TTR < 60%) over the 6 months prior to the adverse event. Results: In the cohort of 304 patients, the mean age was 82 years, 59.9% of the patients were female, and 54.6% had a TTR < 60%. Patients with TTR < 60% had a higher HAS-BLED score (4.04 vs. 2.59; p < 0.001) and INR (6 vs. 5.31; p < 0.05) but lower hemoglobin (11.67 vs. 12.22 g/dL; p < 0.05). TTR < 60% was associated with early readmission after multivariate analysis (OR: 2.05 (CI 95%: 1.16–3.61)). They also had a higher percentage of hemorrhagic events and in-hospital mortality but without reaching statistical significance. Conclusions: Patients with HF and adverse events due to acenocoumarol often have poor INR control, which is independently associated with a higher risk of early readmission.

Neurological complications of heart failure

Heart failure (HF) is a major global cause of death with increasing absolute worldwide numbers of HF patients. HF results from the interaction between cardiovascular aging with specific risk factors, comorbidities, and disease modifiers. The failing heart and neuronal injury have a bidirectional interaction requiring specific management strategies. Decreased cardiac output has been associated with lower brain volumes. Cerebral blood flow (CBF) may normalize following heart transplantation among severe HF patients. Stroke and cognitive impairment remain the main neurologic conditions associated with HF. However, HF patients may also suffer from chronic cerebral hypoperfusion. It seems likely that HF-related ischemic strokes are primarily the result of cardiac embolism. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is present in half of stroke patient with HF. The increased risk of hemorrhagic strokes is less well characterized and likely multifactorial, but may in part reflect a higher use of long-term antithrombotic therapy. The steady improvement of neuroimaging techniques has demonstrated an increased prevalence of silent ischemic lesions among HF patients. The populations most likely to benefit from long-term anticoagulant therapy are HF patients with AF. Cognitive impairment in HF can have a variety of clinical manifestations from mild memory problems to dementia.

Anticoagulation in Patients with Heart Failure and Sinus Rhythm

The risk of thromboembolic events is significantly increased among patients with heart failure, even in those without atrial fibrillation. However, it is still unclear whether patients with heart failure and sinus rhythm can benefit from prophylactic anticoagulant therapy.This was a retrospective review of the pathophysiological mechanisms, epidemiological studies, and clinical trials on anticoagulation in patients with heart failure and sinus rhythm.Some subgroup analyses of clinical trials found that prophylactic anticoagulant therapy could reduce the incidence of stroke in patients with heart failure and sinus rhythm, and the risk of bleeding was significantly increased. Regarding the incidence of primary endpoint outcomes, all results from clinical trials were negative.Prophylactic anticoagulation did not improve the clinical outcome in patients with heart failure and sinus rhythm.