Cardiac Computed Tomography-Derived Left Atrial Volume Index as a Predictor of Long-Term Success of Cryo-Ablation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Left Atrial Volume Index Predicts Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence after Catheter Ablation Only in Obese Patients-Brief Report

BACKGROUND

It has been shown that obesity and a higher body mass index (BMI) are associated with a higher recurrence rate of atrial fibrillation (AF) after successful catheter ablation (CA). The same has been proven for the left atrial volume index (LAVI). It has also been shown that there is a correlation between LAVI and BMI. However, whether the LAVI's prognostic impact on AF recurrence is BMI-independent remains unclear.

METHODS

We prospectively included 62 patients with paroxysmal AF who were referred to our institution for CA. All patients underwent radiofrequency CA with standard pulmonary veins isolation. Transthoracic 2-D echocardiography was performed one day after CA to obtain standard measures of cardiac function and morphology. Recurrence was defined as documented AF within 6 months of the follow-up period. Patients were also instructed to visit our outpatient clinic earlier in case of symptoms suggesting AF recurrence.

RESULTS

We observed AF recurrence in 27% of patients after 6 months. The mean BMI in our cohort was 29.65 ± 5.08 kg/cm2 and the mean LAVI was 38.04 ± 11.38 mL/m2. We further divided patients into two groups according to BMI. Even though the LAVI was similar in both groups, we found it to be a significant predictor of AF recurrence only in obese patients (BMI ≥ 30) and not in the non-obese group (BMI < 30). There was also no significant difference in AF recurrence between both cohorts. The significance of the LAVI as an AF recurrence predictor in the obesity group was also confirmed in a multivariate model.

CONCLUSIONS

According to our results, the LAVI tends to be a significant predictor of AF recurrence after successful catheter ablation in obese patients, but not in normal-weight or overweight patients. This would suggest different mechanisms of AF in non-obese patients in comparison to obese patients. Further studies are needed in this regard.

Using machine learning to enhance prediction of atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation

Background

Traditional risk scores for recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) following catheter ablation utilize readily available clinical and echocardiographic variables and yet have limited discriminatory capacity. Use of data from cardiac imaging and deep learning may help improve accuracy and prediction of recurrent AF after ablation.

Methods

We evaluated patients with symptomatic, drug-refractory AF undergoing catheter ablation. All patients underwent pre-ablation cardiac computed tomography (cCT). LAVi was computed using a deep-learning algorithm. In a two-step analysis, random survival forest (RSF) was used to generate prognostic models with variables of highest importance, followed by Cox proportional hazard regression analysis of the selected variables. Events of interest included early and late recurrence.

Results

Among 653 patients undergoing AF ablation, the most important factors associated with late recurrence by RSF analysis at 24 (+/-18) months follow-up included LAVi and early recurrence. In total, 5 covariates were identified as independent predictors of late recurrence: LAVi (HR per mL/m2 1.01 [1.01-1.02]; p < .001), early recurrence (HR 2.42 [1.90-3.09]; p < .001), statin use (HR 1.38 [1.09-1.75]; p = .007), beta-blocker use (HR 1.29 [1.01-1.65]; p = .043), and adjunctive cavotricuspid isthmus ablation [HR 0.74 (0.57-0.96); p = .02]. Survival analysis demonstrated that patients with both LAVi >66.7 mL/m2 and early recurrence had the highest risk of late recurrence risk compared with those with LAVi <66.7 mL/m2 and no early recurrence (HR 4.52 [3.36-6.08], p < .001).

Conclusions

Machine learning-derived, full volumetric LAVi from cCT is the most important pre-procedural risk factor for late AF recurrence following catheter ablation. The combination of increased LAVi and early recurrence confers more than a four-fold increased risk of late recurrence.

Results of a 4-Year Follow Up of Patients with Paroxysmal and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation after Cryoablation

Background and Objectives: Cryoablation is an established treatment method for atrial fibrillation (AF). We present the long-term results of cryoablation in 94 patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF treated in our center. Materials and Methods: This was an observational, retrospective study of 94 patients who underwent a cryoablation procedure for paroxysmal or persistent AF from 2015 to 2017. The follow up was 51 ± 3 months. The absence of arrhythmia was checked at 6, 12, 24, and 48 months after the procedure with 24 h Holter monitoring. We evaluated echocardiography parameters before and 48 months after cryoablation. The quality of life was assessed by calculating EHRA scores at each visit. Results: The mean history of pre-procedural AF duration was 55.3 ± 8.6 months. Paroxysmal AF was present in 42% of patients and persistent AF in 58%. Comparing the EHRA classes, a statistically significant difference was observed between the score assessed before the procedure and the score after one year, as well as when comparing the rates before the procedure and four years after the procedure (p < 0.000). The recurrence of AF was observed in 22.3% of patients 1 year after the procedure, in 26.6% of patients 2 years after the procedure, and in 34% of patients 4 years after the procedure; 9.3% of them were left in permanent AF. During the observation period, 28% of patients underwent a repeated pulmonary vein isolation procedure, and 6% of patients had a permanent pacemaker implanted. Five hematomas (5%) and one instance of phrenic nerve palsy (1%) were observed during the procedure. Conclusions: The rate of arrhythmia recurrence increased every year after cryoablation. Quality of life improved after the procedure, despite the recurrence of AF. A quarter of patients had to undergo a repeat pulmonary vein isolation procedure.

Freedom from atrial arrhythmia and other clinical outcomes at 5 years and beyond after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) is now a mainstream procedure although long-term outcomes are uncertain. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of procedural outcomes at 5 years and beyond.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We searched PubMed and Embase and after the screening, identified 73 studies (67 159 patients) reporting freedom from atrial arrhythmia, all-cause death, stroke, and major bleeding at ≥5 years after AF ablation. The pooled mean age was 59.7y, 71.5% male, 62.2% paroxysmal AF, and radiofrequency was used in 78.1% of studies. Pooled incidence of freedom from atrial arrhythmia at 5 years was 50.6% (95%CI 45.5-55.7%) after a single ablation and 69.7% [95%CI (confidence interval) 63.8-75.3%) after multiple procedures. The incidence was higher among patients with paroxysmal compared with non-paroxysmal AF after single (59.7% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.002) and multiple (80.8% vs. 60.6%, p < 0.001) ablations but was comparable between radiofrequency and cryoablation. Pooled incidences of other outcomes were 6.0% (95%CI 3.2-9.7%) for death, 2.4% (95%CI 1.4-3.7%) for stroke, and 1.2% (95%CI 0.8-2.0%) for major bleeding at 5 years. Beyond 5 years, freedom from arrhythmia recurrence remained largely stable (52.3% and 64.7% after single and multiple procedures at 10 years), while the risk of stroke and bleeding increased over time.

CONCLUSION

Nearly 70% of patients having multiple ablations remained free from atrial arrhythmia at 5 years, with the incidence slightly decreasing beyond this period. Risk of death, stroke, and major bleeding at 5 years were low but increased over time, emphasizing the importance of long-term thromboembolism prevention and bleeding risk management.

Value of Left Atrial Strain in Predicting Recurrence after Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

This study tested the relationship between left atrial (LA) function parameters and the results of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Consecutive patients undergoing PVI for the first time between 2019 and 2021 were included. Patients underwent radiofrequency ablation using contact force catheters and an electroanatomical system. Follow-up consisted of ambulatory visits/televisits and 7-day Holter monitoring (at 6 and 12 months after ablation). On the day of ablation, all patients underwent transesophageal and transthoracic echocardiography with LA strain analysis. The primary endpoint was atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence during the follow-up period. Of 221 patients, 22 did not meet the echocardiographic quality criteria, leaving 199 patients. The median follow-up period was 12 months, and 12 patients were lost to follow-up. Recurrences were observed in 67 patients (35.8%) after a mean of 1.06 procedures per patient. The patients were divided into a sinus rhythm (SR, n = 109) group and an AF (n = 90) group based on their cardiac rhythm at the time of echocardiography. In the SR group, univariable analysis showed that LA reservoir strain, LA appendage emptying velocity (LAAV), and LA volume index predicted AF recurrence, with only LAAV being significant in the multivariable analysis. In AF patients, univariable analysis revealed no LA strain parameters predicting AF recurrence.

Left Atrial Cardiomyopathy - A Challenging Diagnosis

Left atrial cardiomyopathy (LACM) has been an ongoing focus of research for several years. There is evidence that LACM is responsible for atrial fibrillation and embolic strokes of undetermined sources. Therefore, the correct diagnosis of LACM is of clinical importance. Various techniques, including electrocardiography, echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, electroanatomic mapping, genetic testing, and biomarkers, can both identify and quantify structural, mechanical as well as electrical dysfunction in the atria. However, the question arises whether these techniques can reliably diagnose LACM. Because of its heterogeneity, clinical diagnosis is challenging. To date, there are no recommendations for standardized diagnosis of suspected LACM. However, standardization could help to classify LACM more precisely and derive therapeutic directions to improve individual patient management. In addition, uniform diagnostic criteria for LACM could be important for future studies. Combining several parameters and relating them seems beneficial to approach the diagnosis of LACM. This review provides an overview of the current evidence regarding the diagnosis of LACM, in which several potential parameters are discussed and, consequently, a proposal for a diagnostic algorithm is presented.

MiRNA21 and IL-18 levels in left atrial blood in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cryoablation and their predictive value for recurrence of atrial fibrillation

PURPOSE

The recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after cryoablation still needs to be prioritized, including discriminating predictive indicators.

METHODS

Eighty-seven patients aged 43-83 years who underwent cryo-balloon ablation were divided into paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) and non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (non-PAF) groups. Baseline data, intraoperative index, and miRNA21, IL-18, NLRP3, and visfatin levels in peripheral venous blood and left atrial blood were assessed. Follow-up was performed for 6 months to observe the recurrence of AF. A Cox risk ratio model was used to analyze indicators for predicting AF recurrence.

RESULTS

The non-PAF and PAF group recurrence rates of AF were statistically different (p < 0.05) at 9/22 (40.9%) and 11/65 (16.9%), respectively. Biomarker levels in the left atrial blood were higher in the non-PAF group than in the PAF group (p < 0.05). The effects of non-PAF and levels of miRNA21 and IL-18 in left atrial serum on the recurrence of AF after cryoablation statistically differed (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The levels of miRNA21 and IL-18 were higher in left atrial blood than in peripheral blood, which may be related to the severity of AF and recurrence of AF after cryoablation.