Impact of Contrast Echocardiography on Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients

Contrast Echocardiography in Heart Failure: Update 2023

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The application of ultrasound-enhancing agents (contrast agents) has improved the accuracy and reproducibility of echocardiography. The review focuses on the currently approved and evolving indications for contrast echocardiography in patients with heart failure, specifically examining clinical studies conducted after the publication of the guidelines in 2017 and 2018.

RECENT FINDINGS

The current ASE/EACVI recommendations for contrast echocardiography are based on its accuracy and reproducibility in comparison to non-enhanced echocardiography or other imaging modalities like cardiac MRI. However, tissue characterization remains limited with contrast echocardiography. During the last few years, several studies have demonstrated the clinical impact of using contrast agents on the management of patients with heart failure. There is growing evidence on the benefit of using contrast echocardiography in critically ill patients where echocardiography without contrast agents is often suboptimal and other imaging methods are less feasible. There is no risk of worsening renal function after the administration of ultrasound-enhancing agents, and these agents can be administered even in patients with end-stage renal disease. Contrast echocardiography has become a valuable tool for first-line imaging of patients with heart failure across the spectrum of patients with chronic heart failure to critically ill patients.

Current and Future Role of Ultrasonography in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit

The contemporary practice of ultrasonography in the cardiac intensive care unit integrates the principles of echocardiography with whole-body imaging to create a more expansive paradigm of critical care ultrasonography (CCUS). This article will review the use of CCUS for diagnostic assessment, monitoring, therapeutic guidance, and prognosis.

Ultrasound-Enhancing Agent Safely Enhances Left Ventricular Visualization by Transthoracic Echocardiography in Patients on ECMO Support

OBJECTIVE

The authors investigated if the use of ultrasound-enhancing agents (UEA) can safely improve left ventricular (LV) image quality by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).

DESIGN AND SETTING

This study was performed in a tertiary cardiothoracic and ECMO center in London, United Kingdom.

PARTICIPANTS

The authors included 18 prospectively identified consecutive patients requiring TEE supported on peripherally implanted ECMO.

INTERVENTION AND MEASUREMENTS

TTE was performed before and after the UEA administration. The authors assessed the LV image quality using the biplane (apical-4-chamber and apical-2-chamber views) endocardial border definition index (1 = good, 2 = suboptimal, 3 = poor, and 4 = unavailable), as well as the feasibility of LV ejection fraction (LVEF) measurement. The authors also gathered sequential clinical information for the next 24 hours.

MAIN RESULTS

The patients' median age was 47 years (35, 65), and 5 (28%) were women. The biplane endocardial border definition index improved from the suboptimal to the good range (2.167 [1.812, 3.042] v 1.500 [1.417, 1.792], p = 0.0004) after the use of UEA. The feasibility of LVEF tripled from 25% (n = 5) to 83% (n = 15) (p = 0.0008) with UEA use. The UEA did not set off the bubble alarm and did not impact clinical or ECMO parameters.

CONCLUSION

The use of UEA significantly improved the quality of LV biplane images by transthoracic echocardiography, transforming them from suboptimal to good in patients supported with peripherally implanted ECMO. UEA use tripled the feasibility of measuring LVEF by TTE without affecting clinical and ECMO parameters.

Safety of Lumason® (SonoVue®) in special populations and critically ill patients

Evidence for the safe use of Lumason® (SonoVue®), an ultrasound enhancing agent (UEA), in special patient populations is critical to enable healthcare professionals to make informed decisions concerning its use in such patients. Herein, we provide insight on the safety and tolerability of Lumason® in special patient populations. Findings are presented from clinical pharmacology studies conducted in patients with compromised cardiopulmonary conditions, from a retrospective study performed in critically ill patients, and from post-marketing surveillance data from over 20 years of market use of Lumason® (SonoVue®). No detrimental effects of Lumason® on cardiac electrophysiology were observed in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), and no significant effects on pulmonary hemodynamics were noted in patients with pulmonary hypertension or congestive heart failure. Similarly, no effects on several assessments of pulmonary function (e.g., FVC) were observed in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and no clinically meaningful changes in O2 saturation or other safety parameters were observed after administration of Lumason® to patients with diffuse interstitial pulmonary fibrosis (DIPF). The retrospective study of critically ill patients revealed no significant difference for in-hospital mortality between patients administered Lumason® for echocardiography versus those who had undergone echocardiography without contrast agent. Post-marketing surveillance revealed very low reporting rates (RR) for non-serious and serious adverse events and that serious hypersensitivity reactions were rare. These findings confirm that Lumason® is a safe and well tolerated UEA for use in special populations and critically ill patients.