Prevalence, Incidence and Prognostic Implications of Left Bundle Branch Block in Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndromes (From the CLARIFY Registry)

The effectiveness and feasibility of using multi-lead ECG monitoring combined with a programmed intracavitary ECG to complete left bundle branch area pacing

BACKGROUND

Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBaP) as an alternative method for delivering physiological pacing, is difficult for many primary hospitals that lack the electrophysiological multichannel recorder to carry out. We hope to find a simple and feasible method that combines the multi-lead surface electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring and the intracavity ECG of the pacing programmer to achieve LBBaP.

METHODS

A total of 50 patients with bradycardia indications who attempted permanent pacemaker implantation were included in this study. We referred to multi-lead surface ECG monitoring and pacing system analyzer (PSA), combined with the nine-zone pacing method of the LBBaP, to complete LBBaP. We assessed multiple parameters to verify whether the LBBaP was successfully achieved and used univariable analysis of variance for repeated measures to judge the feasibility and effectiveness of LBBaP without the electrophysiological multichannel recorder.

RESULTS

LBBaP was successfully archived without the electrophysiological multichannel recorder in 44 of 50 patients (88%). In the study, paced QRS duration and the stimulus to peak left ventricular activation time (Sti-LVAT) were 117.04 ± 10.34 ms and 71.10 ± 7.91 ms and had no significant changes in the 3-month follow-up. The unipolar pacing threshold and R-wave amplitudes were 0.85 ± 0.32 V and 10.36 ± 5.24 mV at baseline respectively, which also showed stability during the 1-month and 3-month follow-up. During the 3-month follow-up, no lead-related complication was recorded.

CONCLUSION

It is effective and feasible to achieve LBBaP combining the multi-lead ECG monitoring and the intracavitary ECG of PSA without the electrophysiological multichannel recorder, which could be an alternative to perform LBBaP.

Prevalence and incidence of intraventricular conduction disturbances among Chinese adults: Results from the Kailuan study

Objectives

Epidemiological data on intraventricular conduction disturbances (IVCDs) are limited in the Chinese population. We aimed to investigate the prevalence and incidence of different types of IVCDs among Chinese adults.

Methods

From June 2006 to October 2007, a total of 100,250 individuals from the Kailuan Study underwent electrocardiogram examinations. Follow-up visits were performed biennially. The prevalence and incidence of right bundle branch block (RBBB), incomplete RBBB (IRBBB), left bundle branch block (LBBB), incomplete LBBB, left anterior fascicular block (LAFB), left posterior fascicular block (LPFB) and non-specific IVCD (NIVCD) were calculated. Their association with risk factors and cardiovascular diseases was also investigated.

Results

The prevalence and incidence of all IVCDs were 3.19 and 1.70%, respectively. RBBB, IRBBB, and LAFB were the IVCD types that had the highest prevalence and incidence. The prevalence (3.67% vs. 1.29%; P < 0.001) and incidence (1.93% vs. 0.84%; P < 0.001) of IVCDs were higher among males than among females. The prevalence and incidence of most IVCD types increased with age. IRBBB, LBBB, and LAFB were significantly associated with hypertension. LBBB and NIVCD were associated with diabetes mellitus. In addition, LBBB and LAFB were related to prior myocardial infarction.

Conclusion

IVCDs differ in prevalence and incidence according to sex and age group. They also show disparate associations with other cardiovascular comorbidities. These differences need to be considered in daily clinical practice.