Atrial Fibrillation in Anaphylaxis

The Roles of Cardiovascular H2-Histamine Receptors Under Normal and Pathophysiological Conditions

This review addresses pharmacological, structural and functional relationships among H₂-histamine receptors and H₁-histamine receptors in the mammalian heart. The role of both receptors in the regulation of force and rhythm, including their electrophysiological effects on the mammalian heart, will then be discussed in context. The potential clinical role of cardiac H₂-histamine-receptors in cardiac diseases will be examined. The use of H₂-histamine receptor agonists to acutely increase the force of contraction will be discussed. Special attention will be paid to the potential role of cardiac H₂-histamine receptors in the genesis of cardiac arrhythmias. Moreover, novel findings on the putative role of H₂-histamine receptor antagonists in treating chronic heart failure in animal models and patients will be reviewed. Some limitations in our biochemical understanding of the cardiac role of H₂-histamine receptors will be discussed. Recommendations for further basic and translational research on cardiac H₂-histamine receptors will be offered. We will speculate whether new knowledge might lead to novel roles of H₂-histamine receptors in cardiac disease and whether cardiomyocyte specific H₂-histamine receptor agonists and antagonists should be developed.

Human histamine H2 receptors can initiate cardiac arrhythmias in a transgenic mouse

Histamine is known to lead to arrhythmias in the human heart. A mouse model to mimic these effects has hitherto not been available but might be useful to study the mechanism(s) of H₂-histamine receptor-induced arrhythmias and may support the search for new antiarrhythmic drugs. In order to establish such a model in mice, we studied here the incidence of cardiac arrhythmias under basal and under stimulated conditions in atrial and ventricular preparations from mice that overexpressed the human H₂-histamine receptors in a cardiac-specific way (H₂-TG) in comparison with their wild-type (WT) littermate controls. We had shown before that histamine exerted concentration and time-dependent positive inotropic and positive chronotropic effects only in cardiac preparations from H₂-TG and not from WT. We noted under basal conditions (no drug addition) that right atrial preparations from H₂-TG exhibited more spontaneous arrhythmias than right atrial preparations from WT. These arrhythmias in H₂-TG could be blocked by the H₂-histamine receptor antagonist cimetidine. In a similar fashion, histamine and dimaprit (an agonist at H₂ and not H₁-histamine receptors) more often induced arrhythmias in right atrial preparations from H₂-TG than from WT. To understand better the signal transduction mechanism(s) involved in these arrhythmias, we studied partially depolarized left atrial preparations. In these preparations, a positive inotropic effect of histamine was still present in the additional presence of 44 mM potassium ions (used to block sodium channels) in H₂-TG but not WT and this positive inotropic effect could be blocked by cimetidine and this is consistent with the involvement of calcium ion channels in the contractile and thus might mediate also the arrhythmogenic effects of histamine in H₂-TG. However, compounds reported to release histamine from cells and thereby leading to arrhythmias in humans, namely morphine, ketamine, and fentanyl, failed to induce a more pronounced positive inotropic effect in atrial preparations from H₂-TG compared to WT, arguing against an involvement of histamine release in their proarrhythmic side effects in patients. Measuring left ventricular contractility in isolated retrogradely perfused hearts (Langendorff mode), we detected under basal conditions (no drug application) more spontaneous arrhythmias in hearts from H₂-TG than from WT. In summary, we noted that overexpression of human H₂-histamine receptors in a novel transgenic animal model can lead to arrhythmias. We suggest that this model might be useful to understand the mechanism(s) of histamine-induced cardiac arrhythmias in humans better in a molecular way and may be of value to screen novel antiarrhythmic drugs.

Anaphylaxis-induced atrial fibrillation and anesthesia: Pathophysiologic and therapeutic considerations

Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmia in western society affecting more than 35 million individuals worldwide annually. It is a common postoperative complication and may also occur spontaneously during general and local anesthesia administration. Aging, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and cardiovascular diseases including cardiomyopathies, congenital cardiac anomalies, heart failure, myocardial ischemia, pericarditis, previous cardiac surgery, vascular disease, and valvular heart disease are some correlated factors. Beyond age, increased incidence of atrial fibrillation has been correlated to autoimmune system activation as it is the underlying mechanism of persistent atrial fibrillation development. Current research supports an association between the complement system activation and lymphocyte-pro-inflammatory cytokines release with the cardiac conduction system and atrial fibrosis. The loss of CD28 antigen from CD4+ CD28+ T lymphocytes seems to play a major role in atrial fibrillation development and prognosis. Except atrial fibrillation, a variety of additional electrocardiographic changes, resembling those with digitalis intoxication may accompany anaphylaxis and particularly Kounis syndrome. Histamine is one well-known mediator in allergic and inflammatory conditions as physiologically regulates several cardiovascular and endothelial functions with arrhythmogenic potential. The increased oxidative stress, measured by the redox potentials of glutathione, has been correlated with atrial fibrillation incidence and prevalence. The use of antazoline, a first-generation antihistamine agent used for rapid conversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with preserved left ventricular function and for rapid atrial fibrillation termination during accessory pathway ablation denotes that anaphylaxis-induced histamine production could be the cause of atrial fibrillation at least in some instances. The anaphylaxis diagnosis in anesthesia can be challenging owing to the absence of cutaneous manifestetions such as flushing, urticaria, or angioedema. Anticoagulation for stroke prevention, rate and rhythm control medications, invasive methods such as radiofrequency ablation or cryoablation of pulmonary veins as well surgical ablation constitute the treatment basis of atrial fibrillation. Understanding the underlying mechanisms of atrial fibrillation by cardiologists, anesthesiologists and surgeons, as well as potential treatments, to optimize care is of paramount importance.

Assessment of selected parameters of the circulatory system in patients undergoing oral aspirin challenge

INTRODUCTION

It is known that the administration of the drug during the oral aspirin challenge (OAC) can cause hypersensitivity symptoms not only from the respiratory system or skin, but also from the cardiovascular system.

AIM

To assess the occurrence and nature of cardiovascular adverse events during the OAC in patients suspected of hypersensitivity to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 52 patients with symptoms of hypersensitivity to aspirin (ASA) or other NSAIDs in the form of skin reactions or respiratory response in anamnesis. Patients were treated with OAC and simultaneously were subject to monitoring of clinical manifestations of hypersensitivity to ASA/NSAIDs, ventilation disorders and cardiovascular functions.

RESULTS

The most common reaction of the cardiovascular system during OAC was tachycardia or supraventricular and ventricular extrasystoles, regardless of the day of the study and the result of OAC. Supraventricular and ventricular tachycardia was recorded incidentally. Atrial or ventricular fibrillation or flutter was not observed. There was no evidence of any ischemic heart disease. In 2 patients, hypotension was registered, but only 1 of them required typical treatment of anaphylaxis.

CONCLUSIONS

No clinically significant cardiac arrhythmias were recorded during OAC. The changes observed in the records of blood pressure and ECG monitoring show that OAC performed in accordance with the current guidelines does not pose a high risk to the patient's health and life as a result of cardiovascular reactions.