Time to Antibiotics and the Outcome of Patients with Septic Shock: A Propensity Score Analysis

Effect of delayed antibiotic use on mortality outcomes in patients with sepsis or septic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The use of antibiotics is essential in the treatment of sepsis and septic shock, and delaying their administration may impact patient mortality outcomes. However, there is currently a controversial debate surrounding this issue. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to explore the association between delayed antibiotic use and mortality in patients with sepsis and septic shock.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library to identify relevant studies published from 2013 to 2023. These studies focused on patients with sepsis or septic shock and provided information on various antibiotic administration times and mortality rates. Two independent reviewers screened and extracted the data. The quality of each study was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and the collected data were analyzed using STATA 15.1 software.

RESULTS

A total of 29 studies were included, consisting of 17 prospective cohort studies and 12 retrospective cohort studies. The meta-analysis showed that compared to administration of antibiotics within 1 h, each hour of delay in antibiotic administration increased the in-hospital mortality (IHM) (OR = 1.041, 95 % CI: 1.021-1.062), and ministration of antibiotics after 1 h increased the IHM (OR = 1.205, 95 % CI: 1.123-1.293). There was no significant change in the 28-day mortality (OR = 1.297, 95 % CI: 0.882-1.906), 90-day mortality (OR = 1.172, 95 % CI: 0.846-1.622), and 1-year mortality (OR = 0.986, 95 % CI: 0.422-2.303). Administration of antibiotics within 3 h may reduce the IHM (OR = 1.297, 95 % CI: 1.011-1.664, p = 0.041), while administration of antibiotics within 6 h showed no significant association with the IHM.

CONCLUSION

The administration of antibiotics beyond 1 h after emergency triage or disease identification is strongly associated with an increased IHM in patients with sepsis or septic shock, and each hour of delay in antibiotic administration may be associated with an increase in the IHM. Furthermore, the use of antibiotics identification beyond 3 h after emergency triage / sepsis or septic shock may also increase the IHM.

Impact of the empirical therapy timing on the clinical progress of septic shock patients

AIM

To evaluate the effect of timing of antimicrobial therapy on clinical progress of patients with septic shock.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

We included 204 adult patients diagnosed with septic shock according to Sepsis-3 criteria between March 2016 and April 2021. One-month survival was evaluated using univariate and logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Antibiotic treatment was initiated within 1 h of the vasopressors in 26.4 % of patients. One-month mortality did not differ significantly between patients with and without empirical therapy coverage on etiological agents. Univariate factors that significantly affected one-month survival were starting antibiotics at the first hour, the unit where the case was diagnosed with septic shock, SOFA scores, qSOFA scores, and lactate level. In multivariate analysis, diagnosis of septic shock in the Emergency Service, SOFA score ≥11, qSOFA score of three and lactate level ≥4 were significantly associated with one-month mortality.

CONCLUSION

Training programs should be designed to increase the awareness of septic shock diagnosis and treatment in the Emergency Service and other hospital units. Additionally, electronic patient files should have warning systems for earlier diagnosis and consultation.

Impact of Time-to-Antibiotic Delivery in Pediatric Patients With Cancer Presenting With Febrile Neutropenia

PURPOSE

Febrile neutropenia (FN) in pediatric patients with cancer can cause severe infections, and prompt antibiotics are warranted. Extrapolated from other populations, a time-to-antibiotic (TTA) metric of <60 minutes after medical center presentation was established, with compliance data factoring into pediatric oncology program national rankings.

METHODS

All FN episodes occurring at Vanderbilt Children's Hospital (2007-February 2022) and a sample of episodes from Colorado Children's Hospital (2012-2019) were abstracted, capturing TTA and clinical outcomes including major complications (intensive care unit [ICU] admission, vasopressors, intubation, or infection-related mortality). Odds ratios (ORs) were adjusted for age, treatment center, absolute neutrophil count, hypotension presence, stem-cell transplant status, and central line type.

RESULTS

A total of 2,349 episodes were identified from Vanderbilt (1,920) and Colorado (429). Only 0.6% (n = 14) episodes required immediate ICU management, with a median TTA of 28 minutes (IQR, 20-37). For the remaining patients, the median TTA was 56 minutes (IQR, 37-90), and 54.3% received antibiotics in <60 minutes. There were no significant associations between TTA (<60 or ≥60 minutes) and major complications (adjusted OR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.62 to 1.59]; P = .98), and a TTA ≥60 minutes was not associated with any type of complication. Similarly, TTA, when evaluated as a continuous variable, was not associated with a major (OR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.94 to 1.04]; P = .69) nor any other complication in adjusted analysis.

CONCLUSION

There is no clear evidence that a reduced TTA improves clinical outcomes in pediatric oncology FN and thus it should not be used as a primary quality measure.

Risk of Misleading Conclusions in Observational Studies of Time-to-Antibiotics and Mortality in Suspected Sepsis

BACKGROUND

Influential studies conclude that each hour until antibiotics increases mortality in sepsis. However, these analyses often (1) adjusted for limited covariates, (2) included patients with long delays until antibiotics, (3) combined sepsis and septic shock, and (4) used linear models presuming each hour delay has equal impact. We evaluated the effect of these analytic choices on associations between time-to-antibiotics and mortality.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 104 248 adults admitted to 5 hospitals from 2015-2022 with suspected infection (blood culture collection and intravenous antibiotics ≤24 h of arrival), including 25 990 with suspected septic shock and 23 619 with sepsis without shock. We used multivariable regression to calculate associations between time-to-antibiotics and in-hospital mortality under successively broader confounding-adjustment, shorter maximum time-to-antibiotic intervals, stratification by illness severity, and removing assumptions of linear hourly associations.

RESULTS

Changing covariates, maximum time-to-antibiotics, and severity stratification altered the magnitude, direction, and significance of observed associations between time-to-antibiotics and mortality. In a fully adjusted model of patients treated ≤6 hours, each hour was associated with higher mortality for septic shock (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.07; 95% CI: 1.04-1.11) but not sepsis without shock (aOR: 1.03; .98-1.09) or suspected infection alone (aOR: .99; .94-1.05). Modeling each hour separately confirmed that every hour of delay was associated with increased mortality for septic shock, but only delays >6 hours were associated with higher mortality for sepsis without shock.

CONCLUSIONS

Associations between time-to-antibiotics and mortality in sepsis are highly sensitive to analytic choices. Failure to adequately address these issues can generate misleading conclusions.

2023 Update on Sepsis and Septic Shock in Adult Patients: Management in the Emergency Department

BACKGROUND

Sepsis/septic shock is a life-threatening and time-dependent condition that requires timely management to reduce mortality. This review aims to update physicians with regard to the main pillars of treatment for this insidious condition.

METHODS

PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE were searched from inception with special attention paid to November 2021-January 2023.

RESULTS

The management of sepsis/septic shock is challenging and involves different pathophysiological aspects, encompassing empirical antimicrobial treatment (which is promptly administered after microbial tests), fluid (crystalloids) replacement (to be established according to fluid tolerance and fluid responsiveness), and vasoactive agents (e.g., norepinephrine (NE)), which are employed to maintain mean arterial pressure above 65 mmHg and reduce the risk of fluid overload. In cases of refractory shock, vasopressin (rather than epinephrine) should be combined with NE to reach an acceptable level of pressure control. If mechanical ventilation is indicated, the tidal volume should be reduced from 10 to 6 mL/kg. Heparin is administered to prevent venous thromboembolism, and glycemic control is recommended. The efficacy of other treatments (e.g., proton-pump inhibitors, sodium bicarbonate, etc.) is largely debated, and such treatments might be used on a case-to-case basis.

CONCLUSIONS

The management of sepsis/septic shock has significantly progressed in the last few years. Improving knowledge of the main therapeutic cornerstones of this challenging condition is crucial to achieve better patient outcomes.

Impact of renal replacement therapy strategy on beta-lactam plasma concentrations: the BETAKIKI study-an ancillary study of a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Sepsis prognosis correlates with antibiotic adequacy at the early phase. This adequacy is dependent on antibacterial spectrum, bacterial resistance profile and antibiotic dosage. Optimal efficacy of beta-lactams mandates concentrations above the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the targeted bacteria for the longest time possible over the day. Septic acute kidney injury (AKI) is the most common AKI syndrome in ICU and often mandates renal replacement therapy (RRT) initiation. Both severe AKI and RRT may increase outside target antibiotic concentrations and ultimately alter patient's prognosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial that compared an early RRT initiation strategy with a delayed one in 620 critically ill patients undergoing severe AKI (defined by KDIGO 3). We compared beta-lactam trough concentrations between the two RRT initiation strategies. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with sufficient trough plasma concentration of beta-lactams defined by trough concentration above 4 times the MIC. We hypothesized that early initiation of RRT could be associated with an insufficient antibiotic plasma trough concentration compared to patients allocated to the delayed strategy.

RESULTS

One hundred and twelve patients were included: 53 in the early group and 59 in the delayed group. Eighty-three patients (74%) had septic shock on inclusion. Trough beta-lactam plasma concentration was above 4 times the MIC breakpoint in 80.4% (n = 90) of patients of the whole population, without differences between the early and the delayed groups (79.2% vs. 81.4%, respectively, p = 0.78). On multivariate analysis, the presence of septic shock and a higher mean arterial pressure were significantly associated with a greater probability of adequate antibiotic trough concentration [OR 3.95 (1.14;13.64), p = 0.029 and OR 1.05 (1.01;1.10), p = 0.013, respectively). Evolution of procalcitonin level and catecholamine-free days as well as mortality did not differ whether beta-lactam trough concentration was above 4 times the MIC or not.

CONCLUSIONS

In this secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial, renal replacement therapy initiation strategy did not significantly influence plasma trough concentrations of beta-lactams in ICU patients with severe AKI. Presence of septic shock on inclusion was the main variable associated with a sufficient beta-lactam concentration.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The AKIKI trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT01932190) before the inclusion of the first patient.

Systematic Review on the Effects of Prompt Antibiotic Treatment on Survival in Septic Shock and Sepsis Patients in Different Hospital Settings

This study aims to determine the impact of prompt administration of antibiotics in evaluating the prognosis of patients with septic shock or sepsis. On January 1, 2022, we searched the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and MEDLINE databases for English-language articles regarding when antibiotics should be administered to patients with septic shock or sepsis. These articles were required to be published between 2010 and 2021. The primary objective was sudden or expected death from any cause at a specified time. In the study, 154,330 patients from 35 sepsis trials were included. In 19 trials, the effectiveness of antibiotics administered to 20,062 patients was evaluated. Of those, 16,652 received the correct medications. In 24 studies, the length of time it took to administer antibiotics was associated with an increased mortality rate. In fourteen studies, the time limits associated with patient outcomes ranged from 1 to 125 minutes to three to six hours. In eight studies, there were hourly delays, and in two, the time it took to receive an antibiotic played a role. Separately analyzed, the outcomes for septic shock (12,756 patients in 11 trials) and sepsis (24,282 patients in six studies) were identical. Two-thirds of sepsis studies discovered a correlation between early antibiotic treatment and the patient's prognosis. However, antimicrobial timing metrics varied significantly between studies, and there were no clear time limits.

From "More is Better" to "Less is More": A Commentary on Antimicrobial Use in Pediatric Oncology

Reducing avoidable antimicrobial exposure to pediatric patients with cancer is achievable and necessary to promote optimal short- and long-term outcomes. Multiple evidence-based practices are already well established but should be more consistently implemented. Important opportunities exist to further improve the evidence to guide selective antimicrobial use in pediatric oncology.

The Ramathibodi early warning score as a sepsis screening tool does not reduce the timing of antibiotic administration

Background

Administration of antibiotics to septic patients within 1 h was recommended in 2018 by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) as a strategy to improve survival outcomes. The use of sepsis screening tools in emergency departments (EDs) is important for early diagnosis and initiation of sepsis care. This study aimed to assess the impact of the Ramathibodi early warning score (REWs) on the administration of antibiotics within 1 h of presentation.

Methods

This was an observational retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching between the sepsis-3 criteria (pre-period) and the REWs (post-period) as screening tools in adult patients with sepsis in EDs. The primary outcome was the proportion of receiving antibiotics within 1 h of presentation in the pre- and post-periods.

Results

A total of 476 patients were analyzed without propensity matching. The proportion of antibiotic administration within 1 h was higher in patients screened using the REWs compared with standard of care in the total study population (79.5% vs. 61.4%, p < 0.001). After propensity score matching, 153 patients were included in both groups. The proportion of antibiotic administration within 1 h was similar in patients screened using the REWs and those receiving standard of care (79.7% vs. 80.4%, p = 0.886). However, time to intensive care unit (ICU) admission was faster in patients screened using the REWs. Delays in receiving antibiotics of longer than 3 h were associated with increased mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 7.04, 95% confidence interval 1.45 to 34.11, p = 0.015).

Conclusions

Implementing the REWs as a tool in sepsis screening protocols in EDs did not improve rates of antibiotic administration within 1 h as recommended by the SSC. However, time to ICU admission was improved after implementation of the REWs.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12245-022-00420-w.

Prognostic factors for late death in septic shock survivors: a multi-center, prospective, registry-based observational study

Septic shock patients who survive past the acute period are associated with an increased risk of long-term mortality. However, factors for predicting late death remain unclear. We aimed to investigate the prognostic factors associated with late mortality in septic shock patients with 28-day survival after admission. This retrospective observational study used a prospective, multi-center registry of septic shock patients between October 2015 and December 2019 involving 12 emergency departments (EDs) from the Korean Shock Society. Adult septic shock patients visiting the ED with 28-day survival after admission were included. Among 4624 septic shock patients, 3588 (77.6%) who survived past day 28 were analyzed. The 90-day mortality rate was 14.2%. Non-survivors were older (66.8 vs. 68.9 years; p = 0.032) and had higher lactate levels (3.7 vs. 4.0 mmol/L; p = 0.028) than survivors. Pulmonary and hepatobiliary infections and a history of malignancy (27.7 vs. 57.5%; p < 0.001) were more frequent in the non-survivor group than in the survivor group. Independent risk factors for late death on multivariate regression analysis were age; malignancy; and hemoglobin, blood urea nitrogen, and albumin levels. The length of intensive care unit stay and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score were independently associated with late death. Approximately, one-seventh of septic shock patients who survived past day 28 of admission died by day 90. Physicians must pay attention to survivors with these risk factors during the post-acute period as they have an increased mortality risk.

Relationship between time of emergency department admission and adherence to the Surviving Sepsis Campaign bundle in patients with septic shock

BACKGROUND

Nighttime hospital admission is often associated with increased mortality risk in various diseases. This study investigated compliance rates with the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) 3-h bundle for daytime and nighttime emergency department (ED) admissions and the clinical impact of compliance on mortality in patients with septic shock.

METHODS

We conducted an observational study using data from a prospective, multicenter registry for septic shock provided by the Korean Shock Society from 11 institutions from November 2015 to December 2017. The outcome was the compliance rate with the SSC 3-h bundle according to the time of arrival in the ED.

RESULTS

A total of 2049 patients were enrolled. Compared with daytime admission, nighttime admission was associated with higher compliance with the administration of antibiotics within 3 h (adjusted odds ratio (adjOR), 1.326; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.088-1.617, p = 0.005) and with the complete SSC bundle (adjOR, 1.368; 95% CI, 1.115-1.678; p = 0.003), likely to result from the increased volume of all patients and sepsis patients admitted during daytime hours. The hazard ratios of the completion of SSC bundle for 28-day mortality and in-hospital mortality were 0.750 (95% CI 0.590-0.952, p = 0.018) and 0.714 (95% CI 0.564-0.904, p = 0.005), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Septic shock patients admitted to the ED during the daytime exhibited lower sepsis bundle compliance than those admitted at night. Both the higher number of admitted patients and the higher patients to medical staff ratio during daytime may be factors that are responsible for lowering the compliance.

Timeliness of administration of amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and meropenem in a large tertiary care centre

Background For amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and meropenem to be effective, concentrations must exceed the minimum inhibitory concentration of infecting pathogens. Objective To retrospectively evaluate time windows between both scheduled prescription and administration and reconstitution-preparation and end of administration of intravenous amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and meropenem prescriptions. Setting 37 hospital wards at a tertiary hospital, Belgium. Method All adult hospital stays with at least one amoxicillin-clavulanic acid or meropenem administration in 2018 were reviewed. Time windows were deemed acceptable if < 30 min between prescription and administration and < 90 or < 150 min between reconstitution-preparation and end of administration for amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and meropenem, respectively. Main outcome measure Time windows between prescription and administration and between reconstitution-preparation and administration. Results For 50 273 administered prescriptions, both time windows were acceptable in 53.7% of first dose and 56.4% of follow-up dose administrations. 43.7% of first doses did not respect the time window between reconstitution-preparation and administration (2.8%) or between prescription and administration (40.9%). These discrepancies equalled 11.1% and 26.3% for follow-up doses, respectively. Large variation across hospital wards was observed. After the first five consecutive administrations, 93.1% of patients had not received their antibiotics within the time windows allowed. The most striking predictor of timely administration with respect to both prescription and reconstitution-preparation time was prescription synchronisation with nursing administration rounds. Conclusion For amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and meropenem, timeliness of reconstitution-preparation and administration was appropriate in approximately half of administrations. Evaluating and safeguarding the timeliness of antibiotic administration should be considered an important aspect of antibiotic stewardship.

Infectious Diseases Society of America Position Paper: Recommended Revisions to the National Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Early Management Bundle (SEP-1) Sepsis Quality Measure

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Early Management Bundle (SEP-1) measure has appropriately established sepsis as a national priority. However, the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA and five additional endorsing societies) is concerned about SEP-1's potential to drive antibiotic overuse because it does not account for the high rate of sepsis overdiagnosis and encourages aggressive antibiotics for all patients with possible sepsis, regardless of the certainty of diagnosis or severity of illness. IDSA is also concerned that SEP-1's complex "time zero" definition is not evidence-based and is prone to inter-observer variation. In this position paper, IDSA outlines several recommendations aimed at reducing the risk of unintended consequences of SEP-1 while maintaining focus on its evidence-based elements. IDSA's core recommendation is to limit SEP-1 to septic shock, for which the evidence supporting the benefit of immediate antibiotics is greatest. Prompt empiric antibiotics are often appropriate for suspected sepsis without shock, but IDSA believes there is too much heterogeneity and difficulty defining this population, uncertainty about the presence of infection, and insufficient data on the necessity of immediate antibiotics to support a mandatory treatment standard for all patients in this category. IDSA believes guidance on managing possible sepsis without shock is more appropriate for guidelines that can delineate the strengths and limitations of supporting evidence and allow clinicians discretion in applying specific recommendations to individual patients. Removing sepsis without shock from SEP-1 will mitigate the risk of unnecessary antibiotic prescribing for noninfectious syndromes, simplify data abstraction, increase measure reliability, and focus attention on the population most likely to benefit from immediate empiric broad-spectrum antibiotics.

A narrative review on antimicrobial therapy in septic shock: updates and controversies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Antibiotics are an essential treatment for septic shock. This review provides an overview of the key issues in antimicrobial therapy for septic shock. We include a summary of available evidence with an emphasis on data published in the last few years.

RECENT FINDINGS

We examine apparently contradictory data supporting the importance of minimizing time to antimicrobial therapy in sepsis, discuss approaches to choosing appropriate antibiotics, and review the importance and challenges presented by antimicrobial dosing. Lastly, we evaluate the evolving concepts of de-escalation, and optimization of the duration of antimicrobials.

SUMMARY

The topics discussed in this review provide background to key clinical decisions in antimicrobial therapy for septic shock: timing, antibiotic choice, dosage, de-escalation, and duration. Although acknowledging some controversy, antimicrobial therapy in septic shock should be delivered early, be of the adequate spectrum, appropriately and individually dosed, rationalized when possible, and of minimal effective duration.

Impact of the timeliness of antibiotic therapy on the outcome of patients with sepsis and septic shock

OBJECTIVES

To review the impact of the timeliness of antibiotic therapy on the outcome of patients with sepsis or septic shock.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Open-SIGLE databases, ClinicalTrials.gov and the metaRegister of Controlled Trials on July 27, 2020 for relevant studies on the timing of antibiotic therapy in adult patients with sepsis or septic shock. The primary outcome measure was all-cause crude or adjusted mortality at reported time points.

RESULTS

We included 35 sepsis studies involving 154,330 patients. Nineteen studies (54%) provided information on the appropriateness of antibiotic therapy in 20,062 patients of whom 16,652 patients (83%) received appropriate antibiotics. Twenty-four studies (68.6%) reported an association between time-to-antibiotics and mortality. Time thresholds associated with patient's outcome varied considerably between studies consisting of a wide range of time cutoffs (1 h, 125 min, 3 h or 6 h) in 14 studies, hourly delays (derived from the analyses of time intervals ranging from to 1 to 24 h) in 8 studies or time-to-antibiotic in 2 studies. Analyses of subsets of studies that focused on patients with septic shock (11 studies, 12,756 patients) or with sepsis (6 studies, 24,281 patients) yielded similar results.

CONCLUSIONS

While two-thirds of sepsis studies reported an association between early administration of antibiotic therapy and patient outcome, the time-to-antibitiocs metrics varied significantly across studies and no robust time thresholds emerged.

Antibiotische Therapie bei kritisch kranken Kindern – Ist weniger mehr?

Die antibiotische Therapie stellt eine wichtige und in vielen Fällen unverzichtbare Maßnahme zum Erreichen einer Restitutio ad integrum bei bakteriellen Infektionen dar. Hierdurch können auch schwere Infektionen bei immungeschwächten Patienten geheilt werden. Wir wissen heute aber auch, dass insbesondere kritisch kranke Kinder häufig inadäquat antibiotisch behandelt werden – mit ebenfalls potenziell schädlichen Nebenwirkungen. In diesem Spannungsfeld aus kritisch krankem Kind, der Angst, etwas zu verpassen, und potenzieller Übertherapie ist es oft nicht einfach, eine rationale Therapieentscheidung zu fällen. Im vorliegenden Review werden aktuelle Studien zu wichtigen Aspekten der antibiotischen Therapie bei kritisch kranken Kindern beleuchtet und im Hinblick auf klinische Umsetzbarkeit interpretiert. Folgende Teilaspekte werden besprochen: 1) Zeitpunkt der antibiotischen Therapie und Möglichkeiten eines abwartenden Verhaltens, 2) die Auswahl der Antibiotika in der empirischen Therapie, 3) Deeskalationsstrategien und 4) die Dauer der antibiotischen Therapie. Antibiotic-Stewardship-Programme, unter Einbeziehung von pädiatrischen Infektiologen, klinischen Pharmazeuten und Mikrobiologen, spielen bei den häufig schwierigen klinischen Entscheidungen eine entscheidende Rolle.