Retrospective evaluation of medication appropriateness and clinical pharmacist drug therapy recommendations for home-based primary care veterans

Case Report: Performing a Medication Safety Review Assisted by Pharmacogenomics to Explain a Prescribing Cascade Resulting in a Patient Fall

Pharmacotherapy for major depressive disorder (MDD) typically consists of trial-and-error and clinician preference approaches, where patients often fail one or more antidepressants before finding an optimal regimen. Pharmacogenomics (PGx) can assist in prescribing appropriate antidepressants, thereby reducing the time to MDD remission and occurrence of adverse drug events. Since many antidepressants are metabolized by and/or inhibit cytochrome P450 enzymes (e.g., CYP2C19 or CYP2D6), drug-induced phenoconversion is common in patients on antidepressant combinations. This condition influences the interpretation of a patient's PGx results, overall risk of ineffective/adverse medication response due to multi-drug interactions, and the recommendations. This complex case describes a patient with MDD, generalized anxiety disorder, and chronic pain who experienced a fall due to excessive sedation following a prescribing cascade of fluoxetine, bupropion, and doxepin. These antidepressants delivered a significant additive sedative effect and interacted with the patient's hydrocodone, potentially contributing to uncontrolled pain, upward dose titration of hydrocodone, and a higher overall sedative burden. The PGx results and drug-induced phenoconversion described in this case report explain the patient's excessive sedation and possibly ineffective/toxic antidepressant and opioid treatment. This case report also illustrates how a more timely multi-drug interaction assessment (preferably in conjunction with preemptive PGx testing) may have informed a different prescribing pattern, reduced/avoided a prescribing cascade, and potentially prevented a drug-related fall.

Pharmacist medication review: An integrated team approach to serve home-based primary care patients

Background

Comprehensive medication review is a patient-centered approach to optimize medication use and improve patient outcomes. This study outlines a pilot model of care in which a remote corporate-based clinical pharmacist implemented comprehensive medication reviews for a cohort of medically complex home-based primary care (HBPC) patients.

Method

Ninety-six medically complex patients were assessed for medication-related problems. Data collected on these patients were: number of chronic conditions, number of medications, appropriate indication for each medication, dose appropriateness, drug interactions, recommendations for medication optimization and deprescribing. The number of accepted recommendations by the HBPC practice was analyzed.

Results

On average, the patients were 82 years old and had 13 chronic conditions. They were taking a median of 17 medications. Over a four-month pilot period, 175 medication recommendations were made, and 53 (30.3%) of them were accepted, with most common being medication discontinuation, deprescribing, and dose adjustments. Sixty-four (66.7%) patients were on a medication listed as potentially inappropriate for use in older adults. The most common potentially inappropriate medication was a proton-pump inhibitor (38.5%), followed by aspirin (24%), tramadol (15.6%), a benzodiazepine (13.5%) or an opioid (8.3%). Eighty-one medications were recommended for deprescribing and 27 medications were discontinued (33.3%). There were 24 recommended dose adjustments and 11 medications were dose adjusted (45.8%). Thirty-four medications were suggested as an addition to the current patient regimen, 2 medications were added (5.9%).

Conclusion

Pharmacist comprehensive medication review is a necessary component of the HBPC healthcare continuum. Additional research is needed to examine whether aligning pharmacists to deliver support to HBPC improves clinical outcomes, reduces healthcare expenditures and improves the patient’s experience.

Psychotropic medication use patterns in home-based primary care: A scoping review

Introduction

Up to a third of patients seen by home-based primary care (HBPC) providers suffer from mental health problems. These conditions tend to be underrecognized and undertreated for patients receiving HBPC. The purpose of this scoping review is to evaluate current psychotropic use patterns for patients receiving HBPC services.

Methods

The following databases were searched for articles reporting on studies conducted in HBPC settings that identified patterns of psychotropic medication prescription and use: Ovid/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsycInfo. Studies that only reported on patients in hospice, rehabilitation, or long-term care facilities were excluded as were drug trials, opinion pieces, case studies, case series, meeting abstracts, and other reviews.

Results

Of 4542 articles initially identified, 74 were selected for full text screening. Of these, only 2 met full criteria and were included in the data extraction and analysis. In 1 study, 41.7% patients enrolled were prescribed an antidepressant, 21.5% were prescribed an antipsychotic (12.7% prescribed both), and 5% to 7% of patients were prescribed benzodiazepines/hypnotics. In the other study, 9% of patients were prescribed an antipsychotic, and 7% were prescribed a benzodiazepine.

Discussion

There are extremely limited data on psychotropic prescribing patterns in HBPC in published studies. Because a significant number of HBPC patients suffer from mental health conditions in addition to other chronic illnesses, treatment can be complex. More studies are needed on current psychotropic prescribing trends to help determine what type of interventions are needed to promote patient safety in this setting.

Consultant Pharmacist⁻Provider Collaboration in U.S. Assisted Living Facilities: A Pilot Study

The purpose of this pilot study was to explore the impact of pharmacist-provided recommendations to general practitioners (GPs) of patients living in assisted living facilities (ALFs). A secondary objective of this study was to explore prescriber and ALF staff perceptions. This was a mixed-method, quasi experimental 1-group pre/post-test study with an explanatory qualitative arm using in-depth semi-structured interviews at five regional ALFs and one independent community pharmacy in East Tennessee. Residents older than 65 years of age, with confirmed diagnosis of Type II diabetes in the pharmacy’s medical record, taking anti-diabetic medication for at least 14 days and resident of affiliated ALF for at least past 30 days were enrolled. Phase 1 demonstrated a 35.1% (13/37 recommendations) acceptance rate of pharmacist recommendations. Phase 2 demonstrated a similar 31.3% acceptance rate of pharmacist recommendations (5/16 recommendations). The mean pre–post difference in average 30-day FBG was greater in the accepted group than the rejected recommendation group (−9.1 vs. −2.3 mg/dL). Pharmacist–GP collaboration in the ALF population was feasible and may improve the quality of patient care of these residents.

Interventions to improve the appropriate use of polypharmacy for older people

BACKGROUND

Inappropriate polypharmacy is a particular concern in older people and is associated with negative health outcomes. Choosing the best interventions to improve appropriate polypharmacy is a priority, hence interest in appropriate polypharmacy, where many medicines may be used to achieve better clinical outcomes for patients, is growing. This is the second update of this Cochrane Review.

OBJECTIVES

To determine which interventions, alone or in combination, are effective in improving the appropriate use of polypharmacy and reducing medication-related problems in older people.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and two trials registers up until 7 February 2018, together with handsearching of reference lists to identify additional studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised trials, non-randomised trials, controlled before-after studies, and interrupted time series. Eligible studies described interventions affecting prescribing aimed at improving appropriate polypharmacy in people aged 65 years and older, prescribed polypharmacy (four or more medicines), which used a validated tool to assess prescribing appropriateness. These tools can be classified as either implicit tools (judgement-based/based on expert professional judgement) or explicit tools (criterion-based, comprising lists of drugs to be avoided in older people).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently reviewed abstracts of eligible studies, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies. We pooled study-specific estimates, and used a random-effects model to yield summary estimates of effect and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We assessed the overall certainty of evidence for each outcome using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 32 studies, 20 from this update. Included studies consisted of 18 randomised trials, 10 cluster randomised trials (one of which was a stepped-wedge design), two non-randomised trials and two controlled before-after studies. One intervention consisted of computerised decision support (CDS); and 31 were complex, multi-faceted pharmaceutical-care based approaches (i.e. the responsible provision of medicines to improve patient's outcomes), one of which incorporated a CDS component as part of their multi-faceted intervention. Interventions were provided in a variety of settings. Interventions were delivered by healthcare professionals such as general physicians, pharmacists and geriatricians, and all were conducted in high-income countries. Assessments using the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool, found that there was a high and/or unclear risk of bias across a number of domains. Based on the GRADE approach, the overall certainty of evidence for each pooled outcome ranged from low to very low.It is uncertain whether pharmaceutical care improves medication appropriateness (as measured by an implicit tool), mean difference (MD) -4.76, 95% CI -9.20 to -0.33; 5 studies, N = 517; very low-certainty evidence). It is uncertain whether pharmaceutical care reduces the number of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs), (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.22, 95% CI -0.38 to -0.05; 7 studies; N = 1832; very low-certainty evidence). It is uncertain whether pharmaceutical care reduces the proportion of patients with one or more PIMs, (risk ratio (RR) 0.79, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.02; 11 studies; N = 3079; very low-certainty evidence). Pharmaceutical care may slightly reduce the number of potential prescribing omissions (PPOs) (SMD -0.81, 95% CI -0.98 to -0.64; 2 studies; N = 569; low-certainty evidence), however it must be noted that this effect estimate is based on only two studies, which had serious limitations in terms of risk bias. Likewise, it is uncertain whether pharmaceutical care reduces the proportion of patients with one or more PPOs (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.85; 5 studies; N = 1310; very low-certainty evidence). Pharmaceutical care may make little or no difference in hospital admissions (data not pooled; 12 studies; N = 4052; low-certainty evidence). Pharmaceutical care may make little or no difference in quality of life (data not pooled; 12 studies; N = 3211; low-certainty evidence). Medication-related problems were reported in eight studies (N = 10,087) using different terms (e.g. adverse drug reactions, drug-drug interactions). No consistent intervention effect on medication-related problems was noted across studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

It is unclear whether interventions to improve appropriate polypharmacy, such as reviews of patients' prescriptions, resulted in clinically significant improvement; however, they may be slightly beneficial in terms of reducing potential prescribing omissions (PPOs); but this effect estimate is based on only two studies, which had serious limitations in terms of risk bias.

Impact of pharmacist identification of medication-related problems in a nontraditional long-term care pharmacy

OBJECTIVES

To characterize the most common medication-related problems and interventions and to evaluate the acceptance rates of pharmacist identification of medication-related problems through percent acceptance rates of interventions in a nontraditional long-term care pharmacy.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of long-term care pharmacy patients 18 years of age or older was used to evaluate pharmacist interventions from January 2014 to August 2016. Data collection included the date and type of intervention, patient demographic information (age, sex), drug class involved, physician provider type (primary care or specialist), intervention outcome, and resolution type. Accepted and rejected interventions were reviewed and classified based on Hepler and Strand's 8 medication-related problems: untreated indications, improper drug selection, subtherapeutic dosage, failure to receive medication, overdosage, adverse drug reactions, drug interactions, and medication use without indication. Data were analyzed with the use of descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Four hundred seventeen interventions were documented over 18 months, approximately 13 interventions per month. Prescribers accepted 47% of interventions and rejected 29%. The remaining 24% of interventions did not have a response from the prescriber. Of the medication-related problems, "untreated indication" and "overdosage" were the most commonly intervened with and accepted interventions. Regarding drug class, pharmacists made the most interventions regarding immunizations (41%), diabetes medications (11%), cholesterol medications (10%), and hypertension medications (7%).

CONCLUSION

Pharmacists are improving the care of patients living in small group homes through various types of recommendations regarding complex disease states, such as diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension, further complicated by mental illness. With almost one-half of all recommendations accepted by prescribers, pharmacists consistently provided recommendations to improve care.

Impact of medication reviews on inappropriate prescribing in aged care

BACKGROUND

Inappropriate prescribing (IP) is prevalent among elderly people in aged care facilities. Little has been published on the effect of pharmacists performing residential medication management reviews (RMMRs) in aged care on the appropriateness of prescribing. RMMRs represents a key strategy for achieving quality use of medicines, by assisting residents in aged care facilities and their carers to better manage their medicines. However, the structure of RMMR has moved from annual to every two years for each resident.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this study was to investigate the impact of pharmacists performing RMMRs on medication use appropriateness, as measured by the Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI).

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of RMMRs pertaining to 223 aged care residents aged ≥65 years in Sydney, Australia. The MAI was applied on two RMMR cohorts; newer cohort (n = 111, 2015) i.e. following the recent changes to the RMMR funding and older cohort (n = 112, 2012) at baseline, after pharmacists' recommendations (assuming all pharmacists' recommendations were accepted by the General Practitioner [GP]), and after the actual uptake of pharmacists' recommendations by the GP. Differences in inappropriate prescribing were measured using the Wilcoxon sign rank test.

RESULTS

Overall, all patients in the study (n = 223) had at least one inappropriate rating at baseline (median MAI score of 26 for the old cohort and 27 for the newer cohort). The median cumulative MAI scores were significantly lower after the RMMRs by pharmacists (15.5 and 20 for the old and new cohort respectively, p < .001) and following the uptake of recommendations by the GP, indicating an increased appropriateness of drug regimen after the medication review (20 and 22 for the old and new cohort respectively, p < .001).

CONCLUSION

This study shows that pharmacist-led medication reviews are effective in reducing inappropriate prescribing among aged care residents, as demonstrated by the reduction in MAI scores. Future studies should focus on the impact of such a decrease on patient outcomes.

Clinic-Level Population Health Intervention by PGY2 Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Residents to Optimize Medication Management in a Self-Insured Employer Health Plan Population

BACKGROUND

Postgraduate year 2 ambulatory care pharmacy residents (PGY2 residents) may be able to improve healthcare quality by providing clinical pharmacy services provided to self-insured employer health plan patients. The objectives of this study are to describe this care delivery in a family medicine clinic, and to identify patients most likely to benefit from the service.

METHODS

From October 1, 2014 till June 30, 2015, comprehensive medication review was completed by PGY2 residents for patients insured by CU Anthem at the University of Colorado Westminster Family Medicine. For patients with medication-related problems (MRPs), a note was sent to the provider before the patient visit. Patient characteristics were compared in those who received a clinical pharmacy note with those who did not.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight MRPs were identified in 39 notes; 40 (58.8%) recommendations were implemented. The following Clinical Pharmacy Priority (CP2) score criteria were identified more frequently in patients with MRPs: age ≥65 years, diagnosis of diabetes, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cardiovascular disease, blood pressure ≥140/90, hemoglobin A_1c >7.9%, and ≥6 items on the medication list.

CONCLUSION

PGY2 residents identified and resolved numerous clinically relevant MRPs. Patient-specific criteria can be utilized to target self-insured employer health plan patients who are likely to have clinically relevant MRPs.

The degree of integration of non-dispensing pharmacists in primary care practice and the impact on health outcomes: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

A non-dispensing pharmacist conducts clinical pharmacy services aimed at optimizing patients individual pharmacotherapy. Embedding a non-dispensing pharmacist in primary care practice enables collaboration, probably enhancing patient care. The degree of integration of non-dispensing pharmacists into multidisciplinary health care teams varies strongly between settings. The degree of integration may be a determinant for its success.

OBJECTIVES

This study investigates how the degree of integration of a non-dispensing pharmacist impacts medication related health outcomes in primary care.

METHODS

In this literature review we searched two electronic databases and the reference list of published literature reviews for studies about clinical pharmacy services performed by non-dispensing pharmacists physically co-located in primary care practice. We assessed the degree of integration via key dimensions of integration based on the conceptual framework of Walshe and Smith. We included English language studies of any design that had a control group or baseline comparison published from 1966 to June 2016. Descriptive statistics were used to correlate the degree of integration to health outcomes. The analysis was stratified for disease-specific and patient-centered clinical pharmacy services.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine health outcomes in 60 comparative studies contributed to the analysis. The accumulated evidence from these studies shows no impact of the degree of integration of non-dispensing pharmacists on health outcomes. For disease specific clinical pharmacy services the percentage of improved health outcomes for none, partial and fully integrated NDPs is respectively 75%, 63% and 59%. For patient-centered clinical pharmacy services the percentage of improved health outcomes for none, partial and fully integrated NDPs is respectively 55%, 57% and 70%.

CONCLUSIONS

Full integration adds value to patient-centered clinical pharmacy services, but not to disease-specific clinical pharmacy services. To obtain maximum benefits of clinical pharmacy services for patients with multiple medications and comorbidities, full integration of non-dispensing pharmacists should be promoted.

Impact of joint consultation by a clinical pharmacist and a clinical geriatrician to improve inappropriate prescribing for elderly patients

Objective

Appropriate prescribing is a key quality element in medication safety. It is unclear if therapeutic interventions resulting from medication review lead to clinically relevant improvements. The effect of medication review on prescribing appropriateness was evaluated in the setting of an outpatient consultation team, consisting of a clinical pharmacist and a clinical geriatrician, in a large non-academic teaching hospital in the Netherlands.

Method

A group of 49 elderly patients with polypharmacy was included after referral by their general practitioner for drug related problems. After a regular assessment by a clinical geriatrician and medication record review by a clinical pharmacist, a treatment plan was implemented based on the recommended interventions. The main outcome measure was the change in the Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI) before and 3 months after primary consultation.

Results

Overall 82% of the recommended interventions of the pharmacist were implemented by the geriatrician of which 63% persisted up to the last visit. Per patient an average of 6.6 interventions were carried out. The interventions showed a reduction of the MAI per patient of 50%. The number of drugs per patient was reduced from 12.1 to 11.0. The number of medications listed on the Beers list decreased from 2.3 to 1.5 and the number of drugs listed on the Hospital Admissions Related to Medication (HARM) Trigger list decreased from 2.1 to 1.5.

Conclusions

Interventions from a multidisciplinary outpatient consultation team were effective in improving appropriate prescribing in elderly outpatients with polypharmacy.

Gastrointestinal Dysmotility in the Elderly

The number of persons 60 years and older has increased 3-fold between 1950 and 2000. Aging alone does not greatly impact the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Digestive dysfunction, including esophageal reflux, achalasia, dysphagia, dyspepsia, delayed gastric emptying, constipation, fecal incontinence, and fecal impaction, is a result of the highly prevalent comorbid conditions and the medications with which those conditions are treated. A multidisciplinary approach with the expertise of a geriatrician, gastroenterologist, neurologist, speech pathologist, and physical therapist ensures a comprehensive functional and neurological assessment of the older patient. Radiographic and endoscopic evaluation may be warranted in the evaluation of the symptomatic older patient with consideration given to the risks and benefits of the test being used. Treatment of the digestive dysfunction is aimed at improving health-related quality of life if cure cannot be achieved. Promotion of healthy aging, treatment of comorbid conditions, and avoidance of polypharmacy may prevent some of these digestive disorders. The age-related changes in GI motility, clinical presentation of GI dysmotility, and therapeutic principles in the symptomatic older patient are reviewed here.

Prevalence and predictors of potentially inappropriate medications among home care elderly patients in Qatar

BACKGROUND

Older patients receiving home health care are particularly at risk of receiving potentially inappropriate medications compared to community-dwelling population. Data on appropriateness of prescribing in these patients is limited.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the prevalence, patterns and determinants of potentially inappropriate medications among elderly patients receiving Home Health Care Services in Qatar.

SETTING

Home Health Care Services department in Hamad Medical Corporation-Qatar.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study, conducted over a 3 months period. Patients 65 years and older, taking at least one medication and receiving home care services were included. Potentially inappropriate medications were identified and classified in accordance with the American Geriatrics Society 2012 Beers Criteria.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications using updated Beers criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 191 patients (38.2%) had at least one potentially inappropriate medication. As per Beers criteria, 35% of medications were classified as medications to be avoided in older adults regardless of conditions and 9% as potentially inappropriate medications when used with certain diseases or syndromes. The majority of potentially inappropriate medications (56%) were classified as medications to be used with caution. The two leading classes of potentially inappropriate medications were antipsychotics (27.4%) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (16%). Significant predictors of inappropriate prescribing were hypertension [adjusted OR 1.7; 95% CI (1.0, 2.8)], dementia [adjusted OR 2.0; 95% CI (1.2, 3.1)], depression [adjusted OR 21.6; 95% CI (2.8, 168.4)], and taking more than ten prescribed medications [adjusted OR 1.9; 95% CI (1.3, 2.8)].

CONCLUSION

Prescribing potentially inappropriate medications is common among older adults receiving home health care services in Qatar, a finding that warrants further attention. Polypharmacy, hypertension, depression and dementia were significantly associated with potentially inappropriate prescribing.

Conceptualizing and measuring potentially inappropriate drug therapy

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Elderly people are the principal consumers of prescription drugs. The more the medication used by the patient, the greater the likelihood there is of the patient being subjected to potentially inappropriate drug therapy (PIDT). PIDT has been measured in the literature with both implicit and explicit tools. The purpose of this review was to assess the use of tools to detect PIDT in various studies and to determine which terms are used to refer to PIDT in practice.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted according to the following steps: the first was identification. In this step, studies were selected from different combinations of the descriptors 'aged', 'elderly', 'inappropriate prescribing' and 'drug utilization' in three different languages, using the Embase, Medline, Scielo, Scopus and Web of Science databases. Second, the papers that satisfied the inclusion criteria for data extraction were carefully examined by three evaluators to determine the tools used and terms that referred to PIDT.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

From the combinations of keywords, 8610 articles were found. At the end of the selection process, 119 of the articles complied with the specified criteria. The degree of agreement among evaluators was moderate for the study titles (κ1  = 0·479) and substantial for abstracts (κ2  = 0·647). With respect to the PIDT evaluation criteria used by the studies, 27·7% used two criteria. Of the 27 evaluation criteria identified, the Beers criteria were used by 82·3% of the studies. More than 50 different terms to identify PIDT were found in the literature.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

This review is the first study to conceptualize and discuss terms that refer to PIDT. At present, there is no consensus regarding terms used to refer to PIDT, with over 50 different terms currently in use. This review shows an increase in the number of articles aimed at evaluating PIDT using implicit and explicit tools.

Tapentadol extended release in the management of peripheral diabetic neuropathic pain

Tapentadol, a μ-opioid agonist and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, has been found to be an effective medication for a wide variety of chronic pain conditions, including back pain, cancer-related pain, and arthritic pain. It has also been found to have fewer gastrointestinal side effects than more traditional opioid-based therapies. More recently, tapentadol extended release has been demonstrated to be effective in the management of painful diabetic neuropathy, an often debilitating condition affecting approximately one-third of all patients with diabetes. This review highlights the most up-to-date basic and clinical studies by focusing on the mechanisms of action of tapentadol and its clinical efficacy, especially with regard to painful diabetic neuropathy.

Interventions to improve the appropriate use of polypharmacy for older people

BACKGROUND

Inappropriate polypharmacy is a particular concern in older people and is associated with negative health outcomes. Choosing the best interventions to improve appropriate polypharmacy is a priority, hence interest in appropriate polypharmacy, where many medicines may be used to achieve better clinical outcomes for patients, is growing.

OBJECTIVES

This review sought to determine which interventions, alone or in combination, are effective in improving the appropriate use of polypharmacy and reducing medication-related problems in older people.

SEARCH METHODS

In November 2013, for this first update, a range of literature databases including MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched, and handsearching of reference lists was performed. Search terms included 'polypharmacy', 'medication appropriateness' and 'inappropriate prescribing'.

SELECTION CRITERIA

A range of study designs were eligible. Eligible studies described interventions affecting prescribing aimed at improving appropriate polypharmacy in people 65 years of age and older in which a validated measure of appropriateness was used (e.g. Beers criteria, Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI)).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently reviewed abstracts of eligible studies, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies. Study-specific estimates were pooled, and a random-effects model was used to yield summary estimates of effect and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach was used to assess the overall quality of evidence for each pooled outcome.

MAIN RESULTS

Two studies were added to this review to bring the total number of included studies to 12. One intervention consisted of computerised decision support; 11 complex, multi-faceted pharmaceutical approaches to interventions were provided in a variety of settings. Interventions were delivered by healthcare professionals, such as prescribers and pharmacists. Appropriateness of prescribing was measured using validated tools, including the MAI score post intervention (eight studies), Beers criteria (four studies), STOPP criteria (two studies) and START criteria (one study). Interventions included in this review resulted in a reduction in inappropriate medication usage. Based on the GRADE approach, the overall quality of evidence for all pooled outcomes ranged from very low to low. A greater reduction in MAI scores between baseline and follow-up was seen in the intervention group when compared with the control group (four studies; mean difference -6.78, 95% CI -12.34 to -1.22). Postintervention pooled data showed a lower summated MAI score (five studies; mean difference -3.88, 95% CI -5.40 to -2.35) and fewer Beers drugs per participant (two studies; mean difference -0.1, 95% CI -0.28 to 0.09) in the intervention group compared with the control group. Evidence of the effects of interventions on hospital admissions (five studies) and of medication-related problems (six studies) was conflicting.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

It is unclear whether interventions to improve appropriate polypharmacy, such as pharmaceutical care, resulted in clinically significant improvement; however, they appear beneficial in terms of reducing inappropriate prescribing.

Descrição da atuação do farmacêutico em equipe multiprofissional com ênfase no cuidado ao idoso hospitalizado

OBJETIVOS: Descrever a atuação do farmacêutico numa equipe multiprofissional, com ênfase no cuidado ao idoso hospitalizado, e intervenções farmacêuticas realizadas durante o seguimento farmacoterapêutico dos indivíduos atendidos. MÉTODOS: Estudo descritivo, exploratório, retrospectivo. A amostra englobou 24 pacientes com idade >60anos, atendidos pelo farmacêutico da equipe multiprofissional de cuidado ao idoso do Hospital Risoleta Tolentino Neves, Belo Horizonte, MG. A farmacoterapia foi analisada em relação ao número de medicamentos; indicação; dose; posologia; aspectos biofarmacêuticos relacionados à via de administração oral ou enteral; estabilidade; incompatibilidade e via de medicamentos parenterais; interações medicamentosas; efetividade e segurança. Verificou-se também a adequação dos medicamentos para idosos, segundo os critérios de Beers. Os medicamentos com atividade anticolinérgica foram identificados segundo Rudolph et al. e Chew et al. As informações foram registradas em instrumento de coleta de dados e a análise estatística descritiva foi realizada em SPSS 10.0. RESULTADOS: Houve diminuição na utilização de medicamentos potencialmente inapropriados para idosos, sendo que na prescrição de alta nenhum idoso estava em uso destes; oito (30%) utilizaram esses medicamentos na admissão; e cinco (20,8%), durante a internação hospitalar. O número de pacientes com prescrição de medicamentos anticolinérgicos reduziu-se de 19 (79,2%) durante a internação para quatro (16,6%) no momento da alta. Vinte e um (87,5%) pacientes demandaram intervenções farmacêuticas, sendo que 20 (83,3%) demandaram intervenções farmacêuticas junto ao médico. Realizou-se um total de 163 intervenções farmacêuticas, com uma média de 6,79 intervenções/paciente e aceitação de 82,2%. CONCLUSÕES: A atuação farmacêutica no cuidado ao idoso, integrada com ações multidisciplinares, otimiza a farmacoterapia, refletindo na segurança e efetividade da assistência prestada ao idoso.

Studies to reduce unnecessary medication use in frail older adults: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Overuse of unnecessary medications in frail older adults with limited life expectancy remains an understudied challenge.

OBJECTIVE

To identify intervention studies that reduced use of unnecessary medications in frail older adults. A secondary goal was to identify and review studies focusing on patients approaching end of life. We examined criteria for identifying unnecessary medications, intervention processes for medication reduction, and intervention effectiveness.

METHODS

A systematic review of English articles using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts from January 1966 to September 2012. Additional studies were identified by searching bibliographies. Search terms included prescription drugs, drug utilization, hospice or palliative care, and appropriate or inappropriate. A manual review of 971 identified abstracts for the inclusion criteria (study included an intervention to reduce chronic medication use; at least 5 participants; population included patients aged at least 65 years, hospice enrollment, or indication of frailty or risk of functional decline-including assisted living or nursing home residence, inpatient hospitalization) yielded 60 articles for full review by 3 investigators. After exclusion of review articles, interventions targeting acute medications, or studies exclusively in the intensive care unit, 36 articles were retained (including 13 identified by bibliography review). Articles were extracted for study design, study setting, intervention description, criteria for identifying unnecessary medication use, and intervention outcomes.

RESULTS

The studies included 15 randomized controlled trials, 4 non-randomized trials, 6 pre-post studies, and 11 case series. Control groups were used in over half of the studies (n = 20). Study populations varied and included residents of nursing homes and assisted living facilities (n = 16), hospitalized patients (n = 14), hospice/palliative care patients (n = 3), home care patients (n = 2), and frail or disabled community-dwelling patients (n = 1). The majority of studies (n = 21) used implicit criteria to identify unnecessary medications (including drugs without indication, unnecessary duplication, and lack of effectiveness); only one study incorporated patient preference into prescribing criteria. Most (25) interventions were led by or involved pharmacists, 4 used academic detailing, 2 used audit and feedback reports targeting prescribers, and 5 involved physician-led medication reviews. Overall intervention effect sizes could not be determined due to heterogeneity of study designs, samples, and measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Very little rigorous research has been conducted on reducing unnecessary medications in frail older adults or patients approaching end of life.

Medication pain management in the elderly: unique and underutilized analgesic treatment options

BACKGROUND

By 2030, the US population of adults aged ≥65 years will increase by >80%, and these adults will account for nearly 20% of the US population. In this population, the decline of multiple physiologic processes and diseases collectively influence treatment options. Physiologic changes, drug-drug interactions resulting from polypharmacy, and drug-disease interactions combine to make elderly patients more sensitive to the adverse events (AEs) associated with medications, all of which must be considered in drug selection.

OBJECTIVE

This article focuses on select underutilized medication options for analgesia that may provide significant advantages in the elderly population above and beyond commonly prescribed conventional choices.

METHODS

We performed a complete review of the literature using the search terms pain management, elderly, opioids, NSAIDs, topical NSAIDs, levorphanol, buprenorphine transdermal, and tapentadol. Databases searched included PubMed, Google Scholar, Ovid, and Athens. Package inserts were utilized for approval dates, indications, and formulations available. We looked at reviews of agents to identify important studies for consideration that searches may have missed. Pharmacology and pharmacokinetic data were taken from randomized trials focusing in this area. Pivotal Phase III trials were utilized for discussion of clinical trial experience and to summarize efficacy and AEs. For purposes of validity, only peer-reviewed literature was included.

RESULTS

There were limited data that specifically outlined analgesic drug selection and highlighted safer alternatives for the elderly patient based on polypharmacy risks, end-organ deterioration, and/or drug choices that presented less risk. We focused on unique opioid alternatives: levorphanol, which offers several therapeutic advantages similar to methadone but without the pharmacokinetic and drug-interaction pitfalls associated with methadone; tapentadol, associated with significantly less gastrointestinal distress and constipation; and transdermal buprenorphine, an agonist/antagonist with less risk for the toxicities associated with conventional opioids and with compliance benefits. Topical NSAIDs are discussed as a viable therapeutic option. Specific attention to a more desirable tolerability profile, including avoidance of drug interactions, end-organ dysfunction, and gastrointestinal bleed with topical NSAID agents versus their oral counterparts is discussed, including the ability to achieve superior tissue levels for appropriately selected inflammatory conditions.

CONCLUSION

It is incumbent that providers consider these options as part of an analgesic armamentarium in an effort to maximize therapeutic benefit and minimize risks in the increasing elderly patient population.

Reliability of a questionnaire for pharmacological treatment appropriateness in patients with multiple chronic conditions

BACKGROUND

The original Medication Appropriateness Index was validated for elderly and polymedicated patients, both in hospital and outpatient contexts. However, no studies have applied this questionnaire in patients with multiple chronic conditions. The objective of this study is to assess the reliability of a modified Medication Appropriateness Index questionnaire in a population of patients with multiple chronic conditions.

METHODS

We selected patients with multiple chronic conditions who were included in an integrated care project conducted at the Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío. To determine inter-observer reliability, each professional (internist or hospital pharmacy specialist) applied the questionnaire under the same conditions and with the same resources. To determine intra-observer reliability, each physician applied the tool at baseline and two months later. We measured inter- and intra-observer reliability using the kappa coefficient. The proportion of overall agreement was also determined.

RESULTS

We obtained a weak overall kappa (k=0.38) for inter-observer reliability and moderate (k=0.52) and very good (k=0.84) values for intra-observer reliability of the internist and specialist in hospital pharmacy, respectively. The proportion of overall agreement is very high in all three situations: 96%, 98%, and 99%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite its limitations, the Medication Appropriateness Index questionnaire modified by our group can be used, as a reliable method, to assess the appropriateness of pharmacotherapy in patients with multiple chronic conditions.

Medication reviews by clinical pharmacists at hospitals lead to improved patient outcomes: a systematic review

Suboptimal medication use may lead to morbidity, mortality and increased costs. To reduce unnecessary patient harm, medicines management including medication reviews can be provided by clinical pharmacists. Some recent studies have indicated a positive effect of this service, but the quality and outcomes vary among studies. Hence, there is a need for compiling the evidence within this area. The aim of this systematic MiniReview was to identify, assess and summarize the literature investigating the effect of pharmacist-led medication reviews in hospitalized patients. Five databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library) were searched from their inception to 2011 in addition to citation tracking and hand search. Only original research papers published in English describing pharmacist-led medication reviews in a hospital setting including minimum 100 patients or 100 interventions were included in the final assessment. A total of 836 research papers were identified, and 31 publications were included in the study: 21 descriptive studies and 10 controlled studies, of which 6 were randomized controlled trials. The pharmacist interventions were well implemented with acceptance rates from 39% to 100%. The 10 controlled studies generally show a positive effect on medication use and costs, satisfaction with the service and positive as well as insignificant effects on health service use. Several outcomes were statistically insignificant, but these were predominantly associated with low sample sizes or low acceptance rates. Therefore, future research within this area should be designed using rigorous design, large sample sizes and includes comparable outcome measures for patient health outcomes.

[Suitability of pharmacological treatment in patients with multiple chronic conditions]

OBJECTIVE

To identify tools for measuring the appropriateness of drug therapy useful in patients with multiple chronic conditions.

DESIGN

We performed a literature review.

DATA SOURCES

The following database were consulted (December 2009): Pubmed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Spanish Medical Index (IME) to detect tools for measuring the appropriateness of treatment in patients with multiple chronic conditions, or otherwise elderly or polypharmacy.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies were identified both qualitative and quantitative methodology, both theoretical and field work, both original and revised work and included work from all areas of the health system. 108 articles were retrieved, of which we selected 59. The consultation of their references include 20 jobs allowed, resulting in a total of 59 articles.

DATA EXTRACTION

Of all the tools identified, the researchers performed a selection of those with possible utility for classified PP. The articles were classified into implicit and explicit methods and the characteristics of the field works were tabulated.

RESULTS

We identified two implicit methods (MAI and Hamdy) and 6 explicit methods (Beers criteria, IPET, STOPP/START, ACOVE, CRIME and NORGEP). None was specific to patients with multiple chronic conditions. The questionnaire MAI, the Beers criteria and its modifications are most often used in literature. The advantages of explicit criteria means that many of them have been developed recently.

CONCLUSION

There are several tools to measure the appropriateness and none of them has been designed for a population of patients with multiple chronic conditions yet, which by its nature requires a specific approach spreads.

Interventions to improve the appropriate use of polypharmacy for older people

BACKGROUND

Inappropriate polypharmacy is a particular concern in older people and is associated with negative health outcomes. Choosing the best interventions to improve appropriate polypharmacy is a priority, hence there is growing interest in appropriate polypharmacy, where many medicines may be used to achieve better clinical outcomes for patients.

OBJECTIVES

This review sought to determine which interventions alone, or in combination, are effective in improving the appropriate use of polypharmacy and reducing medication-related problems in older people.

SEARCH METHODS

A range of literature databases including MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched in addition to handsearching reference lists. Search terms included polypharmacy, Beers criteria, medication appropriateness and inappropriate prescribing.

SELECTION CRITERIA

A range of study designs were eligible. Eligible studies described interventions affecting prescribing aimed at improving appropriate polypharmacy in people aged 65 years and older where a validated measure of appropriateness was used (e.g. Beers criteria or Medication Appropriateness Index - MAI).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three authors independently reviewed abstracts of eligible studies, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies. Study specific estimates were pooled, using a random-effects model to yield summary estimates of effect and 95% confidence intervals.

MAIN RESULTS

Electronic searches identified 2200 potentially relevant citations, of which 139 were examined in detail. Following assessment, 10 studies were included. One intervention was computerised decision support and nine were complex, multifaceted pharmaceutical care provided in a variety of settings. Appropriateness of prescribing was measured using the MAI score postintervention (seven studies) and/or Beers criteria (four studies). The interventions included in this review demonstrated a reduction in inappropriate medication use. A mean difference of -6.78 (95% CI -12.34 to -1.22) in the change in MAI score in favour of the intervention group (four studies). Postintervention pooled data (five studies) showed a mean reduction of -3.88 (95% CI -5.40 to -2.35) in the summated MAI score and a mean reduction of -0.06 (95% CI -0.16 to 0.04) in the number of Beers drugs per patient (three studies). Evidence of the effect of the interventions on hospital admissions (four studies) was conflicting. Medication-related problems, reported as the number of adverse drug events (three studies), reduced significantly (35%) postintervention.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

It is unclear if interventions to improve appropriate polypharmacy, such as pharmaceutical care, resulted in a clinically significant improvement; however, they appear beneficial in terms of reducing inappropriate prescribing and medication-related problems.

A review of pharmacist recommendations in an aged care facility

The aim of this study was to analyse the types of and rationale for the clinical recommendations made by the pharmacist in a rural aged care facility to improve patient safety. The classes of drugs associated with the pharmacist's recommendations were also identified. A related aim was to determine their degree of acceptance by medical practitioners. A retrospective, cross-sectional study design was used to review 56 aged care residents' case notes over a 12-month period. The main outcome measures included: the types of and reasons for recommendations made by the pharmacist; classes of drugs associated with the pharmacist's recommendations; and the implementation rate of the pharmacist's recommendations by the medical practitioner. A total of 196 recommendations were made by the pharmacist to the residents' existing medications. The main types of recommendations were alteration to residents' monitoring (49%), discontinuation of drug treatment (19%) followed by initiation of drug treatment (17%). The main reasons for the recommendations were to reduce potential side-effects (45%), symptom control (32%) and to increase drug efficacy (19%). Analysis of medical practitioners' case notes estimated that 70% of the pharmacist's recommendations were being implemented by the residents' medical practitioner. This case notes analysis reinforces the importance of doctor-pharmacist collaboration in the management of residents' medications in aged care facilities.

Retrospective Evaluation of Home Medicines Review by Pharmacists in Older Australian Patients Using the Medication Appropriateness Index

Background:

Home Medicines Review (HMR), a community-based collaborative service provided by general practitioners (GPs) and accredited pharmacists in Australia, has demonstrated effectiveness in preventing, detecting, and resolving medication-related problems. The Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI) has been found to be a reliable, valid, standardized instrument for assessment of multiple elements of drug therapy prescribing.

Objective:

To retrospectively evaluate the impact of HMRs on the appropriateness of prescribing, using the MAI as a tool to categorize pharmacists' recommendations.

Methods:

A retrospective analysis was performed on a sample of 270 HMR cases pertaining to community-dwelling older people (≥65 years) in New South Wales, Australia. The HMRs were collected from 7 accredited pharmacists using purposive sampling. All HMRs were conducted between February 2006 and October 2009. MAI scores were retrospectively calculated at baseline, after the HMR service based on the pharmacist's recommendations to the GP, and following uptake of the pharmacist's recommendations by the GP.

Results:

The mean ± SD age of the patients was 75.3 ± 7.4 years and 55% were female. Overall, almost all (99%; n = 267) patients had at least 1 inappropriate rating at baseline and more than 50% (n = 154) of the patients had a cumulative MAI score >15. The mean MAI score at baseline was 18.6 ± 11.3, which decreased to 9.3 ± 7.5 after HMR. The number of patients with a cumulative MAI score ≥15 increased to 216 after the HMR service, compared to 116 at baseline. Pharmacists' recommendations documented in the HMR reports and uptake of these recommendations by the GP resulted in a statistically significant decrease in the MAI scores (both p < 0.001).

Conclusions:

The study demonstrates that the provision of medication reviews by accredited pharmacists can improve the appropriateness of prescribing as demonstrated by the change in MAI score and, hence, has the potential to improve patient outcomes. Pharmacists who perform medication reviews could also consider including the systematic approach of applying the MAI to assist in optimizing prescribing in older people.

Effects of medication assessment as part of a comprehensive geriatric assessment on drug use over a 1-year period: a population-based intervention study

High drug consumption among the elderly and inappropriate prescribing practices increase the risk of adverse drug effects in this population. This risk may be decreased by conducting, for example, a medication review alone or as part of a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA); however, little is known about the fate of the changes in medication made as a result of the CGA or medication review. To study the performance of the CGA with regards to medication changes and to determine the persistence of these changes over a 1-year period. This study was a population-based intervention study. A random sample of 1000 elderly (age > or =75 years) was randomized either to a CGA group or to a control group. Home-dwelling patients from these groups (n = 331 and n = 313 for intervention and control groups, respectively) were analysed in this study. Study nurses collected information on medication at study entry and 1 year later in both groups; in the intervention group, study physicians assessed, and changed when appropriate, the medication at study entry. The medication changes and their persistence over 1 year were then evaluated. Medication changes were more frequent in the intervention group than in the control group. Regular medication was changed during follow-up in 277 (83.7%) and in 228 (72.8%) [odds ratio (OR) 1.9; 95% CI 1.3, 2.8] patients in the intervention and control groups, respectively. In the intervention group, study physicians were responsible for 35.4% of all new prescriptions and for 15.6% of all drug terminations. Changes took place particularly in the prescription of CNS drugs. About 58% of the drugs initiated by study physicians were still in use 1 year later, and 25.5% of those terminated by study physicians had been reintroduced. Drug intervention as part of a CGA can be used to rationalize the drug therapy of a patient. However, its effectiveness is subsequently partly counteracted by other physicians working in the healthcare system.

Polypharmacy in older adults with cancer

The definition of "polypharmacy" ranges from the use of a large number of medications; the use of potentially inappropriate medications, which can increase the risk for adverse drug events; medication underuse despite instructions to the contrary; and medication duplication. Older adults are particularly at risk because they often present with several medical conditions requiring pharmacotherapy. Cancer-related therapy adds to this risk in older adults, but few studies have been conducted in this patient population. In this review, we outline the adverse outcomes associated with polypharmacy and present polypharmacy definitions offered by the geriatrics literature. We also examine the strengths and weaknesses of these definitions and explore the relationships among these definitions and what is known about the prevalence and impact of polypharmacy.