Argon plasma coagulation tonsillectomy versus coblation tonsillectomy: a comparison of efficacy and safety.
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology 2019;
133:520-525. [PMID:
31172898 DOI:
10.1017/s0022215119001191]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Tonsillectomy is one of the most common otolaryngological procedures. Nonetheless, there is still no universally approved 'gold standard' technique.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the safety and efficacy of argon plasma coagulation and coblation techniques in tonsillectomy.
METHODS
A multi-institutional, retrospective cohort study was conducted, comprising 283 patients who underwent bilateral tonsillectomies performed by a single surgeon between 2014 and 2017. The outcome measures included: operative time, intra-operative blood loss, post-operative pain and post-operative haemorrhage.
RESULTS
In the argon plasma coagulation group, mean operative time and post-operative haemorrhage rate were significantly reduced, p = 0.0006 and p = 0.003 respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of post-operative pain and intra-operative blood loss.
CONCLUSION
The argon plasma coagulation technique is easy, safe and efficacious. Argon plasma coagulation tonsillectomy seems cost-effective compared to coblation tonsillectomy: the single-use disposable electrode tip and wand used in this study cost AUD$76.50 and AUD$380 respectively. Argon plasma coagulation appears to be a favourable alternative to current modalities such as coblation.
Collapse