Extended use of perioperative antibiotics in head and neck microvascular reconstruction

Effect of Clindamycin compared with Ampicillin-Sulbactam as prophylactic antibiotics for wound infections following major surgery for head and neck cancer: A meta-analysis

A meta-analysis examination was implemented to review the effect of Clindamycin compared with Ampicillin-Sulbactam as prophylactic antibiotics (PAs) management for surgical site wound infections (SSWIs) following major surgery (MS) for head and neck cancer (H&NC). A comprehensive literature examination till May 2023 was done and 1296 interrelated examinations were reviewed. The six elected examinations, enclosed 4293 personals with MS for H&NC were in the utilized examinations' starting point, 1722 of them were utilizing Clindamycin, and 2571 were utilizing Ampicillin-Sulbactam. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were utilized to appraise the consequence of Clindamycin compared with Ampicillin-Sulbactam as PAs management for SSWIs following MS for H&NC by the dichotomous approach and a fixed or random model. Clindamycin had significantly higher SSWI compared with Ampicillin-Sulbactam (OR, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.40-5.02, p = 0.003) in personals with MS for H&NC. Clindamycin had significantly higher SSWI compared with Ampicillin-Sulbactam in personals with MS for H&NC. However, caution needs to be taken when interacting with its values because there was a low sample size of some of the chosen examinations and a low number of examinations found for the comparisons in the meta-analysis.

Clinical applications of the chimeric anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap in head and neck reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infection (SSI) is a common complication following head and neck surgery. Dead space at the excision site can increase the risk of infection, abscess formation, and mortality. Herein, we evaluated the performance of the chimeric anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap in addressing these concerns.

METHODS

Patients who underwent oncologic head and neck reconstruction between October 2016 and November 2021 were divided in two groups: a normal ALT flap and a chimeric dead space filling (DSF) ALT-vastus lateralis flap group. We evaluated the postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients treated with normal ALT flaps (34.7%) and 47 with DSF ALT flap group (65.2%) were included. Only one ALT per case was necessary. Most of the cases involved tongue (31.9%) and lower gingival reconstruction (27.8%). The time to harvest the DSF ALT flap was 134.3 min when compared to the normal ALT flap (116.2 min, p < .001). Vascular occlusion, flap loss, partial necrosis, and fat necrosis were not observed among the different groups.

CONCLUSION

The DSF process can be used as a preventive measure for SSI or vessel exposure due to radiation-induced skin damage. This flap allows same-site reconstruction if the primary tumor recurs by using the pedicle of the chimeric flap for reattachment of another free flap.

Restarting Therapeutic Antibiotics Following Postoperative Prophylaxis in Head and Neck Microvascular Free Tissue Transfer

OBJECTIVE

To determine factors associated with restarting therapeutic antibiotics within 30 days of head and neck microvascular free tissue transfer (HN-MFTT).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study of consecutive HN-MFTTs performed from January 2015 to July 2020.

SETTING

Tertiary academic medical center.

METHODS

Thirty-day postoperative antibiotic use and post-HN-MFTT surgical and medical complications were assessed. Univariable analyses and multivariable logistic regression were used to evaluate risk factors associated with restarting antibiotics.

RESULTS

overall 482 patients with 501 HN-MFTTs were stratified by duration of prophylaxis: ≤24 hours (n = 136, 27.1%), 25-72 hours (n = 54, 10.8%), and >72 hours (n = 311, 62.1%). Antibiotics were restarted in 199 patients (209 procedures, 42%). The most common indications for antibiotic reinitiation were flap recipient site infection (n = 59, 28%); hospital-acquired pneumonia (n = 44, 21%); and wound dehiscence, fluctuance, or change in quality of drain output (n = 44, 21%). Shorter antibiotic prophylaxis (≤24 hours) (odds ratio [OR], 1.95; 95% CI, 1.2-3.0; P = .003), osteocutaneous flaps (OR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.3-3.4; P = .001), and prior immunotherapy/chemotherapy (OR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.2-4.3; P = .01) were associated with reinitiation of antibiotics for surgical infections. Restarting antimicrobials for nosocomial infections was associated with aerodigestive defects (OR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.1-5.2; P = .019), cardiovascular disease (OR, 3.00; 95% CI, 1.5-5.9; P = .001), and medical comorbidities approximated by American Society of Anesthesiologists class 3 or 4 (OR, 2.83; 95% CI, 1.5-5.4; P = .002).

CONCLUSION

Aerodigestive reconstruction, 24-hour postoperative antimicrobial prophylaxis, American Society of Anesthesiologists class 3 and 4, prior chemotherapy/immunotherapy, cardiovascular disease, and osteocutaneous flaps are associated with reinitiation of antibiotics within 30 days of HN-MFTT.

Economic Viability of Penicillin Allergy Testing to Avoid Improper Clindamycin Surgical Prophylaxis

OBJECTIVE

Patients mislabeled with a penicillin allergy are often unnecessarily given prophylactic clindamycin. Thus, otolaryngologists may cause harm due to clindamycin's associated risk of Clostridioides difficile infections (CDI) and surgical site infections (SSI). The objective of this study was to determine the economic feasibility of penicillin allergy testing in preventing unnecessary clindamycin use among patients with an unconfirmed penicillin allergy prior to otolaryngologic surgery.

METHODS

A break-even analysis was performed using the average cost of penicillin allergy testing and a CDI/SSI to calculate the absolute risk reduction (ARR) in baseline CDI/SSI rate due to clindamycin required for penicillin testing to be economically sustainable. The binomial distribution was used to calculate the probability that current penicillin testing can achieve this study's ARR.

RESULTS

Preoperative penicillin testing was found to be economically sustainable if it could decrease the baseline CDI rate by an ARR of 1.06% or decrease the baseline SSI rate by an ARR of 1.34%. The probability of penicillin testing achieving these ARRs depended on the baseline CDI and SSI rates. When the CDI rate was at least 5% or the SSI rate was at least 7%, penicillin allergy testing was guaranteed to achieve economic sustainability.

CONCLUSION

In patients mislabeled with a penicillin allergy, preoperative penicillin allergy testing may be an economically sustainable option to prevent the unnecessary use of prophylactic clindamycin during otolaryngologic surgery. Current practice guidelines should be modified to recommend penicillin allergy testing in patients with an unconfirmed allergy prior to surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N/A Laryngoscope, 2022.

Association of antibiotic allergy labels with hospital length of stay

BACKGROUND

Many antibiotic allergy labels (AAL) are invalid. Excluding true allergy in people with AAL ("delabeling") could improve health outcomes and decrease costs. Several studies with limited covariate adjustment have associated AAL with a prolonged hospital length of stay (LOS).

OBJECTIVE

This study determined whether AAL's association with LOS persisted after extensive adjustment for potential confounders and covariates.

METHODS

All nonpsychiatric admissions to a tertiary care teaching hospital from 2012 to 2015 were included. Generalized estimating equation methods were used to model the daily discharge likelihood as a function of AAL and other important factors (death risk score, daily discharge score, daily severity of illness score, antibiotic use, hospital day and location, weekend-holiday status, and service).

RESULTS

A total of 111,611 admissions (76,460 patients) were studied, in which 16,489 (14.8%) had recorded AAL. Patients with an AAL had a notably greater disease burden: they were older and had more comorbidities, greater health system utilization, and higher death risk. In the univariate analysis, AAL was associated with a significantly decreased daily discharge likelihood (odds ratio [OR], 0.93; [95% confidence interval, 0.90-0.95]). After adjustment for potential confounders and covariates, AAL was not associated with daily discharge likelihood (adjusted OR [aOR] without antibiotics: 1.00 [0.98-1.03]; aOR with antibiotics: 1.02 [0.99-1.04]). Similar results were also seen with penicillin AAL (aOR without antibiotics: 0.99 [0.95-1.02]; aOR with antibiotics: 1.00 [0.96-1.03]).

CONCLUSION

Antibiotic allergy label was strongly associated with a greater disease burden. After adjusting for important covariates, our analysis found no significant association between AAL and hospital LOS.

Antibiotic prophylaxis in head and neck cancer surgery: Systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

Postoperative surgical site infections (SSI) are worrisome complications after head and neck cancer surgery. Due to the lack of direct comparisons, it is difficult to indicate the best antibiotic in the setting of SSI prophylaxis for patients with head and neck cancer. For this reason, we decided to conduct a Bayesian network meta-analysis of clinical studies evaluating various antibiotic classes for SSI prophylaxis; thus, we directly and indirectly compared all the available antibiotics in the setting of head and neck oncological surgery. We performed a systematic review and a network meta-analysis according to the PRISMA-NMA checklist. Regarding inclusion criteria, we included articles with retrospective or prospective design recruiting adult participants with head and neck neoplasm of any subsite that compared different antibiotics or that compared different antibiotic treatment duration with sample sizes of more than 10 patients. Overall, 310 citations were identified by the search on all databases. Of these, 250 were excluded based on title and abstract, leaving 60 publications for full text examination. Finally, 20 papers were included for data extraction and analysis. In total, 8627 patients were evaluated across the included studies. Results of the Bayesian network meta-analysis showed that when compared to clindamycin short course, the antibiotics effective in preventing SSI were ampicillin/sulbactam or other penicillin short course (OR: 0.37, 95%CrI: 0.19-0.72), cefazolin/metronidazole short course (OR: 0.26, 95%CrI: 0.06-0.93), cefazolin (OR: 0.36, 95%CrI: 0.17-0.79), ampicillin/sulbactam long course (OR: 0.20, 95%CrI: 0.04-0.91), cefazolin/metronidazole long course (OR: 0.27, 95%CrI: 0.09-0.64), cefoperazone (OR: 0.05, 95%CrI: 0.002-0.89), cefotaxime (OR: 0.04, 95%CrI: 0.002-0.85). There was no significant difference between clindamycin and no antibiotic (OR: 2.3, 95%CrI: 0.59-9.9). Clindamycin plus aminoglycoside seemed to give a slight protection from SSI compared to clindamycin alone (OR: 0.30, 95%CrI: 0.09-0.99) or no antibiotic (OR: 0.13, 95%CrI: 0.02-067). Antibiotic prophylaxis is important in preventing SSI in head and neck cancer setting. Current evidence suggests that penicillins and cephalosporins are the best choice. Moreover, long duration course does not give any advantage compared to short course prophylaxis. Finally, it is important to implement appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis in patients that are labeled as penicillin allergic, in this regard clindamycin seems to be ineffective and, for this reason, further research is needed to provide a better care for this subset of patients.

Risk factors for surgical site infection in free-flap reconstructive surgery for head and neck cancer: Retrospective Australian cohort study

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infections (SSI) are common complications of free-flap reconstruction for head and neck cancer defects. This study aimed to identify risk factors for SSI following a significant change in local antibiotic prophylaxis practice.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted of 325 patients receiving free-flap reconstruction for head and neck cancer defects at a tertiary hospital in Melbourne, Australia between 2013 and 2019. Charts were queried for recipient SSI (primary outcome), donor SSI, other infections, antibiotic use, hospital length of stay, and mortality.

RESULTS

Risk factors for SSI included female sex, T-classification, hardware insertion, clindamycin prophylaxis, and operative duration. There was a trend toward increased SSI with shorter ≤24 h prophylaxis (OR: 0.43).

CONCLUSION

Antibiotic duration and type were associated with SSI. Complexity of surgery, T-classification, hardware use, and operative duration were also independently associated with SSI. A prospective trial is indicated to elicit optimal prophylactic antibiotic duration.

The Impact of Healthcare-Associated Infections in Patients Undergoing Oncological Microvascular Head and Neck Reconstruction: A Prospective Multicentre Study

Simple Summary

Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) result in an increased morbidity and a delay in adjuvant therapy—thus increasing the cancer recurrence rates—in patients undergoing oncological microvascular head and neck reconstruction. HAIs also result in a cost increase for the Health System. We prospectively analysed the incidence, clinical characteristics, risk factors and impacts of these infections in 65 patients undergoing head and neck free-flap reconstruction in three third-level university hospitals in Madrid (Spain). The three of them implemented the same antibiotic prophylactic regimen for surgical interventions. The rate of HAIs was 61.54%. The following complications were significantly more frequent in patients with HAIs: need to reoperate (p = 0.009), duration of hospital admission (p < 0.001) and delay in starting radiotherapy (p = 0.009). This manuscript aims to point out the importance of preventing HAIs in head and neck cancer patients, as they have shown a higher risk of postoperative complications.

Abstract

(1) Background: Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) after head and neck free-flap reconstruction are a common postoperative complication. Risk factors for HAIs in this context and their consequences have not been adequately described. (2) Methods: Ongoing prospective multicentre study between 02/2019 and 12/2020. Demographic characteristics and outcomes were analysed, focusing on infections. (3) Results: Forty out of 65 patients (61.54%) suffered HAIs (surgical site infection: 52.18%, nosocomial pneumonia: 23.20%, bloodstream infection: 13% and urinary tract infection: 5.80%). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Enterobacter cloacae were the most frequently implicated. The significant risk factors for infection were: previous radiotherapy (Odds ratio (OR): 5.42; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.39–21.10), anaemia (OR: 8.00; 95% CI, 0.96–66.95), salvage surgery (eight out of eight patients), tracheostomy (OR: 2.86; 95% CI, 1.01–8.14), surgery duration (OR: 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00–1.02), microvascular reoperation <72 h (eight/eight) and flap loss (eight/eight). The major surgical complications were: a need to reoperate (OR: 6.89; 95% CI, 1.42–33.51), prolonged hospital admission (OR: 1.16; 95% CI, 1.06–1.27) and delay in the initiation of postoperative radiotherapy (OR: 9.07; 95% CI, 1.72–47.67). The sixth month mortality rate in patients with HAIs was 7.69% vs. 0% in patients without HAIs (p = 0.50). (4) Conclusions: HAIs were common after this type of surgery, many of them caused by resistant microorganisms. Some modifiable risk factors were identified. Infections played a role in cancer prognosis by delaying adjuvant therapy.

Prevalence of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms in Patients Undergoing Free Flap Reconstruction

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the relationship between antibiotic prophylaxis and prevalence of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) in patients undergoing head and neck cancer reconstruction.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective Chart Review.

METHODS

Retrospective review of patients who underwent head and neck free flap reconstruction at our institution between 2009 to 2016.

RESULTS

Of the 145 patients that underwent head and neck tumor removal surgery using free tissue flaps to cover the defect and therafter received antibiotic prophylaxis, 30 (20.7%) developed postoperative surgical site (n = 17, 55.7%) or distant (n = 13, 43.4%) infections. Seven had a multidrug-resistant infection, the most common with Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). There was no significant relationship between antibiotic spectrum or duration to the development of postoperative infections or MDRO. Pseudomonas and MRSA infections were low overall with only one multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas infection.

CONCLUSIONS

The choice of antibiotic prophylaxis should cover organisms these patients are at highest risk for including anaerobes and Gram-negative organisms. A shorter duration of antibiotic prophylaxis should be considered given no increased risk of postoperative infection nor MDRO. Finally, one must be aware of the potential threat of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas and MRSA amongst this vulnerable population and identity these with culture driven treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 131:E1881-E1887, 2021.

The impact of antibiotic allergy labels on antibiotic exposure, clinical outcomes, and healthcare costs: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

A growing body of evidence suggests that antibiotic allergy labels as documented in medical records are a risk factor for poor clinical outcomes. In this systematic review, we aimed to determine how antibiotic allergy labels influence 3 domains: antibiotic use and exposure, clinical outcomes, and healthcare-related costs.

DESIGN

We performed a systematic review to identify studies reporting outcomes in patients with antibiotic allergy labels compared to nonallergic counterparts. The search included PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, EBSCO, Cochrane Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects and Web of Science. Two reviewers independently screened studies for inclusion and abstracted data. Studies were graded using the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale. Study outcomes included antibiotic use, clinical outcomes, and economic outcomes.

RESULTS

In total, 41 studies met our criteria for inclusion. These studies varied in medical specialty, patient population, healthcare delivery system, and design, but most were conducted among adults age >18 years (85%) in the inpatient setting (82.5%). Among 34 studies examining antibiotic exposure, 32 (94%) found that patients with antibiotic allergy labels received more broad-spectrum antibiotics. Moreover, 31 studies examined clinical outcomes such as length of hospitalization, ICU admission, hospital readmission, multidrug-resistant or opportunistic infection, or mortality, and 27 (87%) found that allergy-labeled patients had at least 1 negative outcome. Of 9 studies examining healthcare costs, 7 (78%) found that allergy-labeled patients incurred significantly higher drug or hospital-related costs.

CONCLUSIONS

Antibiotic allergy labels have negative effects on antibiotic use, clinical outcomes, and economic outcomes in a variety of clinical settings and populations.

Perioperative Antibiotics in Clean-Contaminated Head and Neck Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal evidence-based prophylactic antibiotic regimen for surgical site infections following major head and neck surgery remains a matter of debate.

METHODS

Medline, Cochrane, and Embase were searched for the current best evidence. Retrieved manuscripts were screened according to the PRISMA guidelines. Included studies dealt with patients over 18 years of age that underwent clean-contaminated head and neck surgery (P) and compared the effect of an intervention, perioperative administration of different antibiotic regimens for a variable duration (I), with control groups receiving placebo, another antibiotic regimen, or the same antibiotic for a different postoperative duration (C), on surgical site infection rate as primary outcome (O) (PICO model). A systematic review was performed, and a selected group of trials investigating a similar research question was subjected to a random-effects model meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine studies were included in the systematic review. Compared with placebo, cefazolin, ampicillin-sulbactam, and amoxicillin-clavulanate were the most efficient agents. Benzylpenicillin and clindamycin were clearly less effective. Fifteen studies compared short- to long-term prophylaxis; treatment for more than 48 h did not further reduce wound infections. Meta-analysis of five clinical trials including 4336 patients, where clindamycin was compared with ampicillin-sulbactam, implied an increased infection rate for clindamycin-treated patients (OR = 2.73, 95% CI 1.50-4.97, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In clean-contaminated head and neck surgery, cefazolin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, and ampicillin-sulbactam for 24-48 h after surgery were associated with the highest prevention rate of surgical site infection.

Perioperative Antibiotics in Clean-Contaminated Head and Neck Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal evidence-based prophylactic antibiotic regimen for surgical site infections following major head and neck surgery remains a matter of debate.

METHODS

Medline, Cochrane, and Embase were searched for the current best evidence. Retrieved manuscripts were screened according to the PRISMA guidelines. Included studies dealt with patients over 18 years of age that underwent clean-contaminated head and neck surgery (P) and compared the effect of an intervention, perioperative administration of different antibiotic regimens for a variable duration (I), with control groups receiving placebo, another antibiotic regimen, or the same antibiotic for a different postoperative duration (C), on surgical site infection rate as primary outcome (O) (PICO model). A systematic review was performed, and a selected group of trials investigating a similar research question was subjected to a random-effects model meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine studies were included in the systematic review. Compared with placebo, cefazolin, ampicillin-sulbactam, and amoxicillin-clavulanate were the most efficient agents. Benzylpenicillin and clindamycin were clearly less effective. Fifteen studies compared short- to long-term prophylaxis; treatment for more than 48 h did not further reduce wound infections. Meta-analysis of five clinical trials including 4336 patients, where clindamycin was compared with ampicillin-sulbactam, implied an increased infection rate for clindamycin-treated patients (OR = 2.73, 95% CI 1.50-4.97, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In clean-contaminated head and neck surgery, cefazolin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, and ampicillin-sulbactam for 24-48 h after surgery were associated with the highest prevention rate of surgical site infection.

Oral and maxillofacial surgery in patients undergoing dialysis for advanced renal disease: report of five cases

BACKGROUND

Perioperativemanagement of hemodialysis patients involves many difficulties. High mortality rate and circulatory or respiratory complications in these patients were reported. However, in such reports, there is no concrete information of perioperative management in hemodialysis patients to prevent surgical complications and successful outcomes.

CASE PRESENTATION

We retrospectively reviewed the cases of 5 hemodialysis patients who underwent oral surgery under general anesthesia between January 2005 and December 2017. Primary disease was oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in 4 patients and mandibular ameloblastoma in 1 patient. Partial resection was performed in 2 cases, neck dissection in 1 case. Two cases underwent surgery including vascularized reconstruction. The patients were dialyzed the day before and after surgery for the control of fluid and electrolyte status. Patients received intraoperative and postoperative intravenous infusion of potassium-free solution at 20-40 mL/h. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) were used on the day of hemodialysis during hospitalization. Nafamostat mesilate as an anticoagulant during hemodialysis were used from postoperative day (POD)1 to 7. From POD 1 to 10, cephalosporin as prophylactic antibiotics is adjusted to quarter from half the initial dose. The resuming time of oral intake was similar to that of other oral surgery patients without kidney disease. The daily intake limits of protein, salt and liquid were managed during hospitalization and no cases suffered from malnutrition. No cardiorespiratory complications occurred during the perioperative period. In a case of vascularized osteocutaneous scapular flap reconstruction, grafted scapular bone survived and scapular cutaneous flap necrotized. Necrotic tissue was debrided and split thickness skin was successfully used to cover the grafted scapular bone.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative better result could be achieved if adequate perioperative management specific to hemodialysis patients is carried out. Vascularized flap reconstruction at oral and maxillofacial region in hemodialysis patients is beneficial treatment. Even if the first flap has wound complication secondary flap reconstruction is success and aesthetically better results could be achieved by the strict wound management and debridement.

Current practices in microvascular reconstruction in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Despite major advances in the field of head and neck microvascular free tissue transfer (MFTT) over the past several decades, there are no standardized perioperative regimens for the care of patients undergoing free flap reconstructive surgery, and continued variation in practice exists. This study aimed to report current trends in the field of MFTT performed by otolaryngologists, including surgeon training, institutional operative practices, and perioperative management.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey.

METHODS

A survey of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited residency programs and American Head and Neck Society fellowship sites was conducted.

RESULTS

Seventy-one (62.8%) programs responded, with 67 (94.4%) routinely performing MFTT and 23 (32.4%) having a dedicated microvascular fellowship program. Of institutions performing MFTT, 66 (98.5%) reported the use of a two-surgeon team, most commonly both otolaryngologists (76.3%). Institutional MFTT volumes and donor site frequency are reported. Postoperative care includes routine admission to the intensive care unit (75.2%), step-down unit (15.0%), or general care floor (8.1%). Postoperative flap monitoring practices, including modalities, personnel, and timing/frequency show institutional variation. Despite differences in postoperative monitoring regimen and management (sedation, anticoagulation, antibiotic use), surgeon-reported measures of flap success rate (95.7%, standard deviation [SD] 4.7%) and complication rate (6.8%, SD 2.4%) show little difference across institutions.

CONCLUSIONS

Many elements of MFTT perioperative care show continued variation at an institutional level. There is a notable shift toward the two-team approach within otolaryngology. Self-reported flap complication and success rates showed no significant differences based on perioperative care and monitoring regimen. Further study of perioperative practices should focus on standardization of care to improve overall outcomes in this complex patient population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA Laryngoscope, 129:138-145, 2019.

Literature Review of Criteria for Defining Recipient-Site Infection after Oral Oncologic Surgery with Simultaneous Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

The lack of uniformity of criteria for defining recipient-site infection after oral oncologic surgery with simultaneous reconstruction is problematic despite numerous studies on this issue. This study aimed to investigate the difference in the criteria for defining recipient-site infection after oral oncologic surgery with reconstruction.

METHODS

A Medline search was performed via PUBMED using the following combinations of key terms that were tagged in the title, abstract, or both: "surgical site infection-head neck," "surgical site infection-oral cancer," "antibiotic prophylaxis-head neck," and "surgical site infection-oral carcinoma." Search results were filtered between 2005 and 2017. Articles in which there was no mention of the criteria for definition of surgical-site infection were excluded.

RESULTS

The number of articles that met the inclusion criteria was 24. The lack of uniformity in the criteria for defining recipient-site infection in each article appeared to be attributable mainly to differences in whether an orocutaneous fistula and superficial incisional infection were regarded as recipient-site infection.

CONCLUSION

Reconsideration of the categorization of orocutaneous fistula as infection, regardless of the etiology, and differentiation of superficial and deep incisional infections are necessary for correct assessment of recipient-site infection in oral oncologic surgery.