Adjuvant radiation and survival following surgical resection of sinonasal melanoma

Outcomes of Immunotherapy in Sinonasal Mucosal Melanoma Patients With Recurrent and Metastatic Disease

Sinonasal mucosal melanoma (SNMM) is a rare malignancy with poor prognosis and high recurrence rate. In those with recurrence, survival is dismal. Immunotherapy is an emerging area of investigation; however, there is a scarcity of data on immunotherapy outcomes in SNMM patients with recurrence. We report outcomes of immunotherapy in recurrent SNMM patients with distant versus nondistant recurrence. Fifty-four patients with recurrent SNMM were identified, and 31 (57.4%) had distant recurrence. One-year overall survival (OS) following recurrence was 47.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 34.0%-60.9%), with a median survival of 2.8 years (95% CI: 2.0-5.3). In those with distant recurrence, receipt of immunotherapy was associated with better OS compared to those without immunotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.29 [95% CI: 0.12-0.68], P = .004). While patients with nondistant recurrence (n = 23), who received immunotherapy (n = 6) had worse OS compared to those who did not receive immunotherapy (HR = 4.76 [95% CI: 1.36, 15.89], P = .02). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Efficacy and Safety of Postoperative Adjuvant Radiation Therapy in Resected Nasal Cavity and Paranasal Sinus Mucosal Melanoma: A Combined Analysis

PURPOSE

Mucosal melanoma of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses (NPMM) is a highly aggressive disease. The role of postoperative adjuvant radiation therapy is controversial.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 300 patients with NPMM treated between March 2009 and January 2020 were divided into surgery alone (SA; 158 patients) and surgery plus radiation therapy (SR; 142 patients) groups. Postoperative radiation therapy was recommended, with a total dose of 65 to 70 Gy/30 to 35 fractions to the gross tumor volume and 60 Gy/30 fractions to the clinical target volume. The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival. Secondary endpoints included local recurrence-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and overall survival.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 50.0 months, relapse-free survival in the SA and SR groups was 9.8 and 15.2 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.714; 95% CI, 0.546-0.933; P = .014). Distant metastasis-free survival in the SA and SR groups was 23.8 and 21.3 months (HR, 0.896; 95% CI, 15.7-31.9 vs 13.3-29.3; P = .457). Overall survival in the SA and SR groups was 31.0 and 35.1 months (HR, 0.816; 95% CI, 25.7-36.3 vs 27.1-43.2; P = .178). For patients with stage IVA NPMM, radiation therapy reduced the incidence of relapse by 0.43-fold.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative radiation therapy played a crucial role in the local control of resected NPMM, especially in patients with stage T4a or IVA disease.

A nomogram for predicting overall survival of patients with sinonasal melanoma: A population-based study

Objective

Sinonasal melanoma (SMM) is a rare but aggressive malignancy with 5-year overall survival (OS) rates below 40% in published studies. However, the clinicopathological predictors of the prognosis of SMM remain undefined. We aimed to establish a model to predict the survival outcomes of SMM.

Methods

We searched the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for patients diagnosed with SMM between 1975 and 2016. Data on patient demographics, treatment modalities, and survival outcomes were retrieved. Risk factors for OS were evaluated by survival and Cox regression analyses. We also developed and validated a nomogram for OS, and compared its performance with that of conventional staging systems.

Results

Overall, 305 SMM patients were included in this population-based study. Multivariate Cox regression showed that primary site, American Joint Committee on Cancer stage, radiotherapy, and surgery were significant risk factors for survival. A nomogram was established using the regression model. The C-indices, areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis demonstrated reliable performance of the nomogram.

Conclusion

The nomogram predicting survival outcomes of SMM patients based on clinical information showed good discriminative ability and prognostic accuracy compared with conventional stage classifications. Our nomogram could be used to predict the survival probabilities for SMM patients at different timepoints.

Level of Evidence

2b.

International Multicenter Study of Clinical Outcomes of Sinonasal Melanoma Shows Survival Benefit for Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Potential Improvements to the Current TNM Staging System

Objectives Sinonasal mucosal melanoma (SNMM) is an extremely rare and challenging sinonasal malignancy with a poor prognosis. Standard treatment involves complete surgical resection, but the role of adjuvant therapy remains unclear. Crucially, our understanding of its clinical presentation, course, and optimal treatment remains limited, and few advancements in improving its management have been made in the recent past.

Methods We conducted an international multicenter retrospective analysis of 505 SNMM cases from 11 institutions across the United States, United Kingdom, Ireland, and continental Europe. Data on clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and clinical outcomes were assessed.

Results One-, three-, and five-year recurrence-free and overall survival were 61.4, 30.6, and 22.0%, and 77.6, 49.2, and 38.3%, respectively. Compared with disease confined to the nasal cavity, sinus involvement confers significantly worse survival; based on this, further stratifying the T3 stage was highly prognostic (p < 0.001) with implications for a potential modification to the current TNM staging system. There was a statistically significant survival benefit for patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy, compared with those who underwent surgery alone (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.57–0.96, p = 0.021). Immune checkpoint blockade for the management of recurrent or persistent disease, with or without distant metastasis, conferred longer survival (HR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.25–1.00, p = 0.036).

Conclusions We present findings from the largest cohort of SNMM reported to date. We demonstrate the potential utility of further stratifying the T3 stage by sinus involvement and present promising data on the benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitors for recurrent, persistent, or metastatic disease with implications for future clinical trials in this field.

Sinonasal mucosal melanoma: treatment strategies and survival rates for a rare disease entity : A single center experience and review of literature

Background

Sinonasal mucosal melanoma (SNMM) is a rare disease entity comprising 0.4–1.3% of all melanomas. Surgery with free margins has been the primary treatment over decades. Neither the addition of radiotherapy nor chemotherapy could significantly improve outcome rates of this devastating malignancy. This study presents our clinical experience with SNMM over a 19-year period and summarizes the current body of literature on SNMM.

Methods

This retrospective analysis included 12 patients with SNMM treated from 2001 to 2019 at an academic center. Additionally, a literature review of the last 29 years on treatment and survival data of SNMM was conducted.

Results

Main initial symptoms were epistaxis and nasal obstruction. Of the patients 9 underwent endoscopic surgery, 6 received adjuvant therapy. 3 patients who did not undergo surgery, received chemoradiotherapy, radiotherapy alone, and chemotherapy alone, respectively. At the time of diagnosis 2 patients had distant metastases and 4 patients developed distant metastases during the course of the disease. Mean overall survival (OS) was 30.6 months, 3‑year and 5‑year OS were 25%, and 18.2%, respectively.

Conclusion

Unspecific symptoms and hidden anatomic locations lead to delayed diagnosis and increased rates of metastatic dissemination. Distant metastasis is the main treatment failure in SNMM. Surgery with free margins remains the primary treatment for SNMM. Adjuvant radiotherapy might improve local control in individual cases but efficient systemic therapy is needed to improve outcome rates. To evaluate and define more effective targeted treatment options and improve outcome rates, homogeneous data and prospective multicentric analysis are needed.

Combination of cyclophosphamide and shengbai decoction has synergistic effect against melanoma

Shengbai decoction (SBD), a famous Chinese herbal prescription, has been used for treatment of leukopenia for decades in China. In this study, its synergistic antitumor effect in combination with cyclophosphamide (CTX) on melanoma-bearing mice was investigated. A total of forty C57BL/6 male mice successfully modeled (6-8 weeks old, 18-22 g) were randomly divided into 4 groups (n = 10): 1) the model group, 2) the CTX group, 3) the low dose of SBD (10.66 g/kg/d, raw medicine) and CTX group, and 4) the high dose of SBD (31.98 g/kg/d, raw medicine) and CTX group. Melanoma mice models were established by injection of 0.1 mL of melanoma cell suspension under the midline of the back of each C57BL/6 mouse. Treatment started five days after modeling. The results showed that SBD significantly alleviated histopathological damage, and reduced tumor growth and the concentrations of IL-6, IFN-γ and TNF-α in serum. Furthermore, the combined therapy increased the positive expression of NF-κB and promoted apoptosis compared with CTX alone. These results indicated that SBD could improve the antitumor effect of CTX on melanoma in vivo. And this combination treatment may be an ideal therapy against melanoma.

Impact of adjuvant therapy on survival for sinonasal mucosal melanoma

Background: The optimal treatment modality for sinonasal mucosal melanoma (SNMM) remains controversial.Objectives: To investigate the impact of adjuvant therapy on SNMM.Material and methods: Ninety-two patients were retrospectively analyzed and were grouped into surgery alone (SA), surgery plus radiotherapy (SR), surgery plus chemotherapy (SC) and surgery plus radiochemotherapy (SRC) groups. Survival outcomes among different treatment modalities were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test.Results: Twenty-nine patients (31.5%) developed local recurrence, 10 patients (10.9%) had nodal metastasis, and 41 patients (44.6%) had distant metastasis. The overall survival time (OS) for SA, SR and SRC were 16, 29 and 27 months, respectively, and the disease-free survival time (DFS) were 10, 16 and 16 months, respectively. Significant differences were found between SA and SR (OS: p = .003; DFS: p = .016) and SA and SRC (OS: p = .002; DFS: p = .008). Superior outcomes were also found in SRC group compared to that in SA group for both OS (15 vs. 27 months, p = .012) and DFS (10 vs. 20 months, p = .017) in endoscopic approach.Conclusions and significance: SNMM had poor prognosis with high rates of local recurrence and metastasis. Adjuvant therapy improved survival outcomes for SNMM.

Immortal Time Bias in National Cancer Database Studies

PURPOSE

In studies evaluating the benefit of adjuvant therapies, immortal time bias (ITB) can affect the results by incorrectly reporting a survival advantage. It does so by including all deceased patients who may have been planned to receive adjuvant therapy within the observation cohort. Given the increase in National Cancer Database (NCDB) analyses evaluating postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) as an adjuvant therapy, we sought to examine how often such studies accounted and adjusted for ITB.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A systematic review was undertaken to search MEDLINE and EMBASE from January 2014 until May 2019 for NCDB studies evaluating PORT. After appropriate exclusion criteria were applied, 60 peer-reviewed manuscripts in which PORT was compared with postoperative observation or maintenance therapy were reviewed. The manuscripts were reviewed to evaluate whether ITB was accounted for, the method with which it was adjusted for, impact factor, year of publication, and whether PORT was beneficial.

RESULTS

Of the 60 publications reviewed, 23 studies (38.3%) did not include an adjustment for ITB. Most studies that did adjust for ITB employed a single landmark (LM) time (n = 31), 4 used a sequential landmark analyses, and 2 used a time-dependent Cox model. In 23 of 31 studies (74.2%) that did adjust for ITB via a single LM time, the rationale behind why the specified LM time was chosen was not clearly explained. There was no relationship between adjusting for ITB and year of publication (P = .074) or whether the study was published in a high-impact journal (P = .55).

CONCLUSIONS

Studies assessing adjuvant radiation therapy by analyzing the NCDB are susceptible to ITB, which overestimates the effect size of adjuvant therapies and can provide misleading results. Adjusting for this bias is essential for accurate data representation and to better quantify the impact of adjuvant therapies such as PORT.

An updated review of mucosal melanoma: Survival meta-analysis

Mucosal melanoma (MM) is a highly lethal variant of melanoma that carries a poor prognosis. Extremely low incidence and survival rates have led to few clinical trials, and a lack of protocols and guidelines. The present study performed a survival meta-analysis for the quantitative synthesis of available evidence to search for key patterns that would help clinicians tailor optimal therapeutic strategies in MM. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, MEDLINE, Google Scholar and other databases were searched. Hazard ratios, in disease-specific and overall survival, were calculated for each of the survival-determining variables. MM was 2.25 times more lethal than cutaneous melanoma (CM). The most significant threats to survival were advanced Tumor-Node-Metastasis stage, sino-nasal location, and old age. Chemotherapy was the most effective form of adjuvant therapy. Disease-specific survival, the primary measure of the effect sizes, can fluctuate depending on the accuracy of the reported cause of mortality. In conclusion, MM is a peculiar type of melanoma, with clinical and molecular profile vastly different from the much-familiar CM. In the wake of the era of precision oncology, further studies on driver mutations and oncogenic pathways would likely lead to improved patient survival.

An update on head and neck cancer: new entities and their histopathology, molecular background, treatment, and outcome

The head and neck region harbor numerous specialized tissues of all lineages giving rise to a plethora of different malignancies. In recent years, new types and subtypes of cancer has been described here due to the recognition of their histological and molecular characteristics. Some have been formally accepted in the most recent classifications from the World Health Organization (WHO) and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) as distinct diseases due to characteristics in clinical presentation, outcome, and treatment. In particular, this applies to malignancies of the salivary gland, sinonasal tract, and oropharynx. In this overview, we present the most recent developments in the classification, histopathological characteristics, and molecular features of head and neck cancer. The clinical and radiological characteristics, outcome, and treatment options including perspectives for targeted therapies, are discussed.

Recurrence in a patient with a 10-year history of sinonasal mucosal melanoma manifesting as facial swelling

Sinonasal mucosal melanoma is a rare tumor that develops slowly and may manifest with non specific signs and symptoms, causing significant delay in diagnosis. Local recurrence is common and usually occurs within the first two years after the initial treatment. Prognosis of recurrent lesions is poor and 5-year survival ranges between 10-47%. We report the clinical, radiographic, histopathological and immunohistochemical findings of a recurrent sinonasal mucosal melanoma which was diagnosed 10 years after the initial treatment, in a patient who presented with unilateral facial swelling and one-sided difficulty in breathing of two years duration. We discuss the causes of late diagnosis and review the negative predictive factors for recurrence and survival. As early diagnosis is of paramount importance for prognosis, we emphasize the signs and symptoms of patients with a history of sinonasal mucosal melanoma which should raise the suspicion for recurrence, in spite of a long time interval since diagnosis. Key words: Mucosal melanoma, nasal cavity, sinus, recurrence.