Endoscopic versus microscopic approach in attic cholesteatoma surgery

Exploring trends and developments in cholesteatoma research: a bibliometric analysis

PURPOSE

Examination of the scientific literature on cholesteatoma from past to present using bibliometric methods.

METHODS

A total of 2353 articles on cholesteatoma between 1980 and 2023 were obtained from the Web of Science database and statistically analysed using bibliometric techniques.

RESULTS

The journals with the highest number of contributions to the literature were Otology & Neurotology (n = 192), Acta Oto-Laryngologica (156) and Laryngoscope (149). The most impactful journals based on h-index and total citation (TC) counts were Laryngoscope (h:36, TC: 4241), Otology & Neurotology (29, 3141), and American Journal of Otology (26, 2071) respectively. The most prolific author was Kojima H. (n = 49). According to the findings of the Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy (RPYS) analysis, there has been a significant increase in academic interest in Cholesteatoma since its first description in 1959, particularly following the expansion of its definition in 1977. Subsequently, the trend of increased interest has risen rapidly in later years, with notable peaks in research intensity observed in 1989, 2006, and 2011. The highest academic trend occurred in 2006. In recent years, trending topics have included innovative approaches such as diagnostic and imaging methods particularly alongside technological developments, endoscopic surgery, recurrence and complications, prognosis and quality of life, artificial intelligence, and obliteration.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the evolution of cholesteatoma and its research priorities reveal temporal shifts and emerging areas of interest over time. Primarily, diagnosis, treatment, and surgical approaches remain central. Additionally, research has expanded to encompass developments in surgical techniques, imaging modalities, cellular biology, pathology, and molecular mechanisms.

Management of Cholesteatoma: Surgical Options for Disease Limited to Middle Ear/Mastoid

Surgery remains the mainstay of cholesteatoma management. Through advancement in technique and technology, the available surgical approaches have expanded to include not only the traditional procedures, but also endoscopic procedures, canal wall reconstruction procedures, mastoid obliteration, and retrograde mastoidotomy. Selection of management technique will depend on disease characteristics, patient factors, and surgeon preference.

Comparison of Endoscopic and Microscopic Surgery for the Treatment of Acquired Cholesteatoma by EAONO/JOS Staging

Cholesteatoma is a benign tumor of the middle ear. Tympanoplasty is performed to remove cholesteatoma, prevent recurrence, and avoid complications. Previously, microscopy was used for tympanoplasty; however, endoscopy has become increasingly popular for this procedure. The effectiveness of endoscopy and the appropriate candidacy for endoscopic ear surgery remain controversial. In this retrospective chart review study, we enrolled 107 patients with cholesteatoma who underwent tympanoplasty and compared the microscopic approach (71 patients) and the endoscopic approach (36 patients) at different stages to clarify the benefits of using endoscopy and to determine candidacy for endoscopic ear surgery. Approach selection, complication rate, recurrence rate, and postoperative hearing threshold were compared between microscopic and endoscopic approaches in stages I, II, and III. Endoscopy was used more often than microscopy for early-stage (stage I) cholesteatoma (p = 0.005) and less frequently for advanced-stage (stage II) cholesteatoma (p = 0.02). Endoscopy surgery resulted in chorda tympani injury less often than microscopic surgery (p = 0.049); however, there were no significant differences between these two groups in terms of recurrence rate or postoperative hearing outcome. Endoscopy is particularly useful for early-stage cholesteatoma, and both approaches show no difference in hearing outcome in stage I and II; nevertheless, further research is required to determine an appropriate approach for more advanced stages (stage III).

Endoscopic ear surgery in the treatment of chronic otitis media with atelectasis

PURPOSE

Atelectasis otitis media (AtOM) is a chronic condition where the tympanic membrane (TM) becomes retracted towards the middle ear and the ossicular chain. Surgical treatment for this condition could be indicated based on stage of atelectasis, patient's clinical condition and hearing loss. Over the years, AtOM has been treated with various types of tympanoplasty under microscopic view. The aim of this study is to present the results of endoscopic ear surgery in AtOM.

METHODS

Forty-five patients who underwent endoscopic trans-canal tympanoplasty were included in the study. Preoperative features, intraoperative findings and postoperative outcomes were collected.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, none of the study's patients were classified with a Sadè Grade I, whereas grades II, III and IV were 3 (6.6%), 23 (32.1%) and 19 (67.8%) respectively. The 3 patients with Sadè grade II showed a conductive hearing loss higher than 20 dB and a continuous ear fullness, therefore they were surgically treated. The postoperative graft success rate was estimated at 95.5%. During follow-up, 2 patients showed a TM perforation (at 6 and 12 months after surgery) whereas 1 patient experienced a recurrence of atelectasis in the TM (16 months after surgery). The overall success rate at the final follow-up was calculated at 88.8%. The average preoperative air-conduction threshold was 51.1 ± 21.5, which reduced to 34.6 ± 22.1 (p = 0.04) at follow-up. The preoperative air-bone gap decreased from 28 ± 7.2 to 11.8 ± 10 (p = 0.002) after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Atelectasis otitis media might be suitable for exclusive endoscopic surgical treatment, as it appears to exhibit a low recurrence rate and promising audiological outcomes.

Petrous Bone Cholesteatoma: Facial and Hearing Preservation

Objectives: Petrous bone cholesteatoma (PBC) is a rare condition of the petrous portion of the temporal bone. Treatment of choice consists of radical surgical removal, paying attention to protect the facial nerve and inner ear as far as possible. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of modified translabyrinthine techniques in preserving hearing function and the use of the adjuvant endoscopic techniques in a group of PBC patients. Methods: This study comprised 16 cases of PBCs surgically treated in our Department. Pre- and post-operative hearing status was assessed with pure tone audiometry and speech discrimination and graded according to the Gardner- Robertson classification system. Facial function was based on the House Brackman (HB) classification. PBCs were grouped using Sanna's classification. The choice of surgical technique was based on the above findings together with preoperative evidence. Post-operative follow-up ranged from 1 to 10 years and also included Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging assessment. Results: PBCs were classified as follows: 37.5% infralabyrinthine; 43.75% supralabyrinthine; and 18.75% massive. Preservation of the bone conduction threshold was feasible in 62.5% of patients. For supralabyrinthine PBCs a subtotal petrosetomy was performed in all cases and hearing preservation was possible in 57% of them: an adjuvant endoscopic approach was performed in 43%. Infralabyrinthine PBCs were treated using a modified translabyrinthine approach with preservation of bone conduction in 83% of patients; an adjuvant endoscopic approach was performed in 50% cases. One patient with a massive cholesteatoma was treated by modified translabyrinthine approach, preserving a serviceable level of hearing. In all massive cases, an adjuvant endoscopic approach was performed. In 2 patients with preoperative palsy, facial nerve function showed an improvement. The follow-up period revealed evidence of limited recurrence at CT imaging in 2 patients. Conclusions: The introduction of modified surgical approaches, able to preserve the anatomical-functional structures, have shown an improvement of post-operative hearing outcomes.

Prognostic Factors of Hearing Improvement for EES and MES in Attic Cholesteatoma

OBJECTIVE

The surgical strategy of cholesteatomas is still controversial. This study aimed to compare the hearing improvement and determine the prognostic factors between endoscopic and microscopic ear surgery for attic cholesteatoma via a multicenter retrospective study.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 169 patients with attic cholesteatoma who received endoscopic ear surgery (EES) or microscopic ear surgery (MES) from 12 otorhinolaryngology centers. Hearing improvement between EES and MES was evaluated, including the postoperative pure tone average (PTA) and air-bone gap (A-B Gap), as well as the hearing threshold across the low-, mid-, and high-frequency. The success rate of grafts was collected. Linear regression was performed to access the prognostic value of preoperative PTA and A-B Gap. Patients were followed up for at least 3 years.

RESULTS

The graft success rate of EES was 89.66% (78/87) versus 80.49% (66/82) for MES. The postoperative PTA and A-B Gap demonstrated significant improvement in EES compared to MES (Post-PTA: t = 3.281, P = .001; Post-A-B Gap: t = 2.197, P = .029). In the EES group, there were 59 ears (67.82%) with a postoperative A-B Gap ≤20 dB HL, which revealed a higher rate of successful hearing outcomes in EES as opposed to MES (χ2 = 9.904, P = .019). There were significantly better hearing improvement, shorter surgical times, and lower hospital stays in EES for epitympanic cholesteatoma without stapes superstructure involvement. The preoperative AC ≤79 dB and/or preoperative A-B Gap ≤52 dB was associated with a better prognosis in EES for epitympanic cholesteatoma with stapes superstructure involvement.

CONCLUSIONS

EES showed higher graft success rate, better hearing improvement, shorter surgical times and hospital stays for attic cholesteatoma, particularly without stapes superstructure involvement. The range of preoperative PTA and A-B Gap have shown the prognostic value, which maybe a favorable surgical indication for EES or MES.

Training in Endoscopic Ear Surgery: A Scoping Review

OBJECTIVE

Despite the increasing popularity of Endoscopic Ear Surgery (EES), there is a lack of evidence to guide trainees as they introduce EES into practice. This review aims to evaluate training in EES including the optimal introductory procedures, methods of training, the learning curve, and the determination of competency in EES. In addition, this review seeks to identify any areas falling within these themes requiring further clarification.

DATA SOURCES

A database search of Pubmed, Embase and the Cochrane Library was conducted in June 2022. Original articles, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses reporting on training in EES, introduction into practice, learning curves, and competency assessment were included.

REVIEW METHODS

A scoping review was carried out in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines and reported according to PRISMA guidelines for scoping reviews. A qualitative assessment of results grouped thematically was performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria, with 24 rating as "fair" or "good" on quality assessment. Surgical simulation was the most frequently described method of training as utilized in 11 studies. The most suggested introductory procedure was tympanoplasty which was advocated for in five studies. Heterogeneity existed in the outcomes and methodologies used to measure EES learning curves, with an overreliance on surgical times. No robust definition of competency in EES procedures exists at present.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical simulation appears to be a beneficial training methodology for EES. However, there is a marked lack of objective data to describe the optimal introductory procedures or assessment of competency in EES. Laryngoscope, 133:3269-3278, 2023.

Comparison of the outcomes of endoscopic versus microscopic approach in cholesteatoma surgery: a randomized clinical study

Background

Endoscopic ear surgery is a new, less invasive otologic procedure. Since 1990s, it has been grown in prominence because of anatomical and physiological theories. It offers a view of hidden places, avoids mastoidectomies and endaural vertical and postauricular incisions, and has many other benefits over microscopic surgery. The purpose of this study was to distinguish the difference between the outcomes of microscopic and endoscopic cholesteatoma surgery.

Methods

Eighty individuals who were diagnosed with cholesteatoma participated in this randomized clinical research. Patients were randomly allocated into two equivalent treatment groups. One group submitted to tympanoplasty via microscopic ear surgery and the other group had exclusive trans-canal endoscopic ear surgery. All patients had preoperative otomicroscopic and radiologic assessment to ensure cholesteatoma diagnosis. Audiological evaluations were also obtained.

Results

There was no discernible difference in the tested groups’ operational times, air-bone gaps, or air conduction. The endoscopic surgery group healed significantly more quickly than the microscopic surgery group (5.4 0.5 vs 7.7 0.5 weeks, p > 0.001). The frequency of residual lesions (5.0% vs 22.5%, p = 0.023) and recurrence (7.5% vs 27.5%, p = 0.019) was significantly lower in the endoscopic group of patients.

Conclusions

When comparing healing times, rates of residual disease and rates of recurrence, endoscopic surgery clearly outperforms microscopic surgery. The endoscope encourages visualization and magnification of anatomy while being less invasive thanks to its improved picture quality, lighting, and capacity to “see around the corner.” Additionally, a significant portion of viable mastoid tissues and healthy mucosa were preserved.

Endaural microscopic approach versus endoscopic transcanal approach in treatment of attic cholesteatomas

PURPOSE

Compare the audiological results and postoperative outcomes of the endoscopic approach versus the endaural microscopic approach for treatment of attic cholesteatomas, using a randomized prospective model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty patients were consecutively enrolled in the study and randomized into two groups of treatment of 40 patients: Group A -tympanoplasty with a microscopic endaural approach; Group B -tympanoplasty with an exclusive trans-meatal endoscopic approach. Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were evaluated. Hearing was assessed preoperatively and at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after surgery in both groups.

RESULTS

There were no differences in the parameters analyzed (CT findings, patient age, disease duration, intraoperative cholesteatoma characteristics,) between the group A and B patients. No statistical difference between the two groups regarding hearing improvement, abnormal taste sensation, dizziness, post-operative pain and healing times emerged. Graft success rate was 94.5 % and 92.1 % for MES and ESS respectively.

CONCLUSION

Both microscopic and exclusively endoscopic endaural approaches offer similar and excellent results in the surgical treatment of attic cholesteatomas.

Outcomes of Totally Endoscopic Versus Microscopic Techniques in Middle Ear Cholesteatoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Endoscopes have revolutionized the field of otology for the past two decades due to its minimally invasive technique and improved visualization. The advantage of endoscope during surgery for middle ear cholesteatoma both for diagnosing and aiding in removal of residual disease from the hidden areas and the resulting lower recurrence rates have been proven in the past by many authors. But the feasibility of totally endoscopic ear surgery and its surgical and patient related outcomes are yet to be explored in detail. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the surgical and patient related outcomes between totally endoscopic and microscopic technique in cases of acquired middle ear cholesteatoma. This meta-analysis has been conducted as per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines. Search engines used to identify the eligible articles were Pubmed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Virtual Health Library databases. The studies that compared the outcomes of microscopic and endoscopic techniques in case of acquired middle ear cholesteatoma and with more than 10 patients were included. Outcomes like recurrence, residual disease, graft uptake rate, audiological outcome, conversion rate, pain score, surgery duration, complications and quality of life outcomes were compared.The quality of the included studies was assessed by Methodological Index for Non-randomized studies criteria in case of non-randomized studies and by means of Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool in case of randomized controlled studies. A random effects model was used to calculate pooled estimates. The ODDS ratio and 95% confidence interval were calculated. The heterogeneity among the studies was represented by the Q statistic and Higgins I2 statistic. The test for overall effect was calculated by Z test and a p value of < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. 11 studies were included in this meta-analysis. Out of 11 included studies, 4 were prospectively designed and 7 were retrospective studies. The overall effect showed recurrence rate (Z:2.69, P:0.007) was lower among endoscopic technique. Post-operative pain was less among the endoscopic technique and there was no difference between the groups with respect to surgical duration. Although endoscopic technique showed lower residual rate and post-operative vertigo with better graft success rate among the individual studies, the overall analysis showed that the difference was not statistically significant. Endoscope has been an invaluable tool in the cholesteatoma surgery over the past 20 years due to its excellent optics and minimally invasive technique. Evaluation of the present data available in the literature reveals that both the techniques have similar outcomes except for a definite advantage of endoscopic technique in reducing the recurrence and post-operative discomfort.

A New Robotic Endoscope Holder for Ear and Sinus Surgery with an Integrated Safety Device

In the field of sinus and ear surgery, and more generally in microsurgery, the surgeon is faced with several challenges. The operations are traditionally carried out under binocular loupes, which allows for the surgeon to use both hands for a microinstrument and an aspiration tool. More recently, the development of endoscopic otological surgery allowed for seeing areas that are difficult to access. However, the need to handle the endoscope reduces the surgeon’s ability to use only one instrument at a time. Thus, despite anaesthesia, patient motions during surgery can be very risky and are not that rare. Because the insertion zone in the middle ear or in the sinus cavity is very small, the mobility of the endoscope is limited to a rotation around a virtual point and a translation for the insertion of the camera. A mechanism with remote center motion (RCM) is a good candidate to achieve this movement and allow for the surgeon to access the ear or sinus. Since only the translational motion along the main insertion axis is enabled, the ejection motion along the same axis is safe for the patient. A specific mechanism allows for inserting and ejecting the endoscope. In a sense, the position is controlled, and the velocity is limited. In the opposite sense, the energy stored in the spring allows for very quick ejection if the patient moves. A prototype robot is presented using these new concepts. Commercially available components are used to enable initial tests to be carried out on synthetic bones to validate the mobility of the robot and its safety functions.

Comparison of endoscopic and microscopic management of attic cholesteatoma: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Attic cholesteatoma is a common disease encountered by otologists.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the endoscopic approach to attic cholesteatoma with conventional microscopic technique.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 190 patients (192 ears) diagnosed with attic cholesteatoma extending to the antrum area (stages Ib and II) were randomly assigned into two groups undergoing endoscopic approach and the other microscopic technique. The outcomes were preoperative and intraoperative findings, access to hidden areas expressed in MESVI, mean operative time from first incision to ear-packing, and postoperative findings. Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS version 24.0, and P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The median Middle Ear Structural Visibility Index of the endoscopic group was better than the microscopic group (P < 0.05). The mean operating time by the endoscopic approach was less than the microscopic approach (P < 0.05). The median postoperative pain score in the endoscopic group was lower than the microscopic group (P < 0.05). In addition, there were no statistically significant differences in taste, hearing, vertigo, healing time and long term outcomes between the two groups.

CONCLUSION AND SIGNIFICANCE

Endoscopic management of limited attic cholesteatoma showed definite advantages over the conventional microscopic approach, such as providing better visualization, requiring less postoperative time, subjecting the patients to less pain, and decreasing the incidence of complications.

Postoperative pain after transcanal endoscopic ear surgery: A systematic literature review

OBJECTIVE

Transcanal endoscopic ear surgery is hypothesized to result in less postoperative pain when compared to nonendoscopic techniques due to its minimally invasive nature. In this systematic literature review, we aim to summarize and evaluate the evidence surrounding postoperative pain control and analgesic utilization after transcanal endoscopic ear surgery.

DATABASES REVIEWED

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed using standardized methodology. Computerized and manual searches were performed to identify studies that evaluated postoperative pain outcomes following endoscopic ear surgery. Only studies that met predetermined criteria were selected and evaluated for quality and bias. Extracted data included demographics, pain scores, analgesic administered as well as the diagnosis and type of surgery undertaken. Exclusion criteria included letters/commentaries and reviews, lack of pain outcome data and studies not concerning endoscopic ear surgery.

RESULTS

The systematic literature review included 24 studies. Seven were RCTs, 10 were prospective and 7 were retrospective observational studies. A total of 1859 patients were evaluated for surgical approach and postoperative pain levels and analgesic use. Due to the lack of sufficient reporting of the data, a meta-analysis was not applicable. In the qualitative synthesis for the primary outcome, weighted pooled analysis showed that there was a slight reduction in postoperative pain after transcanal endoscopic ear surgery. Based on the Cochrane risk of bias tool, the quality for the finding is low.

CONCLUSION

There is a small reduction in postoperative pain after transcanal endoscopic ear surgery when compared to nonendoscopic approaches, however, the clinical significance of this reduction is unclear. The evidence was from studies of only low to moderate quality.

Endoscopic transcanal attico-antrostomy versus endoscopic-assisted canal wall up mastoidectomy in management of localized cholesteatoma: a randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to compare results of endoscopic transcanal tympanoplasty with attico-antrostomy with endoscopic-assisted canal wall up mastoidectomy in treatment of cases of limited attic cholesteatoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective randomized single-blinded study involving 40 patients with limited attic cholesteatoma was conducted. Randomization of the patients into two groups was done; 20 patients are managed by endoscopic transcanal tympanoplasty with attico-antrostomy, while the other 20 patients are managed by endoscopic-assisted canal wall up mastoidectomy. Primary outcome is recidivism, while secondary outcomes include hearing results, operative time, pain score and associated complications.

RESULTS

Comparable recidivism rate was found in the two groups. The endoscopic-assisted canal wall up mastoidectomy group was associated with significantly longer duration of surgery and higher postoperative pain score. There was no significant difference between both the groups regarding hearing results and associated complications.

CONCLUSION

In localized attic cholesteatoma cases, endoscopic transcanal tympanoplasty with attico-antrostomy is a time-saving less-invasive reliable technique with good eradication results.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04959539) "retrospectively registered" at 12/7/2021.

Literature Review on Endoscopic Robotic Systems in Ear and Sinus Surgery

In otolaryngologic surgery, endoscopy is increasingly used to provide a better view of hard-to-reach areas and to promote minimally invasive surgery. However, the need to manipulate the endoscope limits the surgeon's ability to operate with only one instrument at a time. Currently, several robotic systems are being developed, demonstrating the value of robotic assistance in microsurgery. The aim of this literature review is to present and classify current robotic systems that are used for otological and endonasal applications. For these solutions, an analysis of the functionalities in relation to the surgeon's needs will be carried out to produce a set of specifications for the creation of new robots.

Postoperative Pain After Endoscopic vs Microscopic Otologic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Equivalent outcomes, such as procedural safety and audiometry, have been reported between endoscopic ear surgery (EES) and microscopic ear surgery (MES). This study aims to determine if EES leads to decreased postoperative pain when compared with MES.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, OVID MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central from 2000 to 2020.

REVIEW METHODS

A systematic review in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines and standardized bias assessment was performed. Studies containing original data on postoperative pain following EES and MES were included.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies fulfilled eligibility: 7 retrospective studies, 6 randomized controlled trials, and 1 case series. Studies included surgery for cholesteatoma (n = 3), tympanoplasty/myringoplasty (n = 6), and stapedotomy (n = 5), pooling data from 974 patients. Postoperative pain was quantitatively described through a variety of numeric pain scores. Meta-analysis was performed on 11 studies. Among the 7 studies utilizing the numeric rating scale or visual analog scale, postoperative pain in the EES cohort was significantly lower than that of the MES cohort (standardized mean difference = -1.45 [95% CI, -2.05 to -0.85], P < .001). Similarly, pain scores were lower in the EES cohort among the 4 studies utilizing the Three Grades Pain Scale (odds ratio = 0.2 [95% CI, 0.09-0.45], P < .001). Additional qualitative strengths identified in EES included significant improvements in visualization, operative time, postoperative complications, and decreased need for canalplasty. Quality assessment indicated low to moderate risk of bias for all studies.

CONCLUSION

Meta-analysis confirms that EES results in significantly less postoperative pain when compared with MES. This surgical approach should be considered in the armamentarium of otologic surgeons, allowing for improved outcomes.

Shifting from postauricular to transcanal microscopic tympanoplasty may have similar frequency-specific improvements with better air-bone-gap closure at low frequencies and a minimal learning-curve effect

The shift from postauricular to transcanal microscopic tympanoplasty brings potential advantages of minimal morbidity, less postoperative pain, patient comfort, and surgical ease and speed, but also uncertainties of unfamiliar grafting material, an inadequate operation view, and an uncertain learning curve. These challenges might affect the successful repair rate and the frequency-specific hearing outcome, which is important for hearing perception. Rare studies reported frequency-specific hearing outcome with the learning curve for shifting from postauricular to transcanal microscopic tympanoplasty. Here, from Jul. 2013 to Nov. 2018, we compared patients in a shift from postauricular approach (35 ears) to transcanal approach (35 ears) of microscopic type-1 tympanoplasty. The results show that both of postauricular and transcanal microscopic tympanoplasties reduced the mean air-bone gap, 0.5k Hz gap, and 1k Hz gap after the surgery. The further analyses on gap change as a function of frequency (0.5, 1, 2, and 4k Hz) show that both of postauricular and transcanal tympanoplasties improved postoperative air-bone gap among the levels of frequency. The post hoc comparisons display a common gap reduction difference between 0.5k and 4k Hz. The successful repair rate did not differ between the 2 groups. There was no correlation between the postoperative mean gap change and the surgery date, suggesting a minimal learning-curve effect. The results of similar frequency-specific improvements and a minimal learning-curve effect may help to ease the concerns of those uncertainties before the shift.

A volumetric three-dimensional evaluation of invasiveness of an endoscopic and microscopic approach for transmeatal visualisation of the middle ear

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the necessary scutum defect for transmeatal visualisation of middle-ear landmarks between an endoscopic and microscopic approach.

METHOD

Human cadaveric heads were used. In group 1, middle-ear landmarks were visualised by endoscope (group 1 endoscopic approach) and subsequently by microscope (group 1 microscopic approach following endoscopy). In group 2, landmarks were visualised solely microscopically (group 2 microscopic approach). The amount of resected bone was evaluated via computed tomography scans.

RESULTS

In the group 1 endoscopic approach, a median of 6.84 mm3 bone was resected. No statistically significant difference (Mann-Whitney U test, p = 0.163, U = 49.000) was found between the group 1 microscopic approach following endoscopy (median 17.84 mm3) and the group 2 microscopic approach (median 20.08 mm3), so these were combined. The difference between the group 1 endoscopic approach and the group 1 microscopic approach following endoscopy plus group 2 microscopic approach (median 18.16 mm3) was statistically significant (Mann-Whitney U test, p < 0.001, U = 18.000).

CONCLUSION

This study showed that endoscopic transmeatal visualisation of middle-ear landmarks preserves more of the bony scutum than a microscopic transmeatal approach.

The outcomes of endoscopic approach for attic cholesteatoma: underwater continuous drilling versus traditional intermittent drilling

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to analyse the differences between underwater continuous drilling and traditional intermittent drilling for attic cholesteatoma.

METHODS

The clinical data of 61 patients with attic cholesteatoma who underwent an endoscopic approach procedure were analysed. Forty patients underwent underwater continuous drilling (group A), and 21 patients underwent traditional intermittent drilling (group B).

RESULTS

The operation time was 64.61 ± 12.90 minutes in group A and 79.60 ± 16.81 minutes in group B (p < 0.05). The anaesthesia time was 102.69 ± 17.93 minutes in group A and 119.82 ± 19.28 minutes in group B (p < 0.05). The dry ear time, the hearing improvement rate and the post-operative complications were no different in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Group A and group B had no differences in surgical outcome or hearing recovery. However, treatment in the former group resulted in a significantly shortened operation and anaesthesia time.

Endoscopic versus microscopic surgery for treatment of middle ear cholesteatoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Endoscopic ear surgery (EES) is minimally invasive and increasingly used to treat middle ear disease. In this meta-analysis, we compared the efficacies of EES and microscopic ear surgery (MES) in patients with middle ear cholesteatoma.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched for studies that reported the comparative surgical outcomes of EES and MES in patients with middle ear cholesteatoma. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis statement. All included studies involved ≥1 of the following outcomes: recurrence of or residual disease, graft intake success rate, audiological performance, and operation time. We calculated the pooled relative risk (RR) or weighted mean difference with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) by using STATA software.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies were included in the quantitative meta-analysis. The pooled recurrence and residual rates of cholesteatoma were significantly lower in the EES group than in the MES group [RR: 0.51, 95%CI: 0.31-0.84, heterogeneity (I²) = 4.7%; P = .394; RR: 0.68; 95%CI: 0.47-0.99; I² = 0.0%; P = .878; respectively]. There were no significant differences in other parameters, such as graft intake success rates, audiological performance, and operation times, between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

The pooled results showed that EES reduced the residual lesion rate and postoperative recurrence risk in patients with middle ear cholesteatoma. However, there was insufficient evidence to prove that EES was advantageous in graft intake success rate auditory performance, and operation time.

Patency of Anterior Epitympanic Space and Surgical Outcomes After Endoscopic Ear Surgery for the Attic Cholesteatoma

OBJECTIVE

To reveal the patency of the anterior epitympanic space (AES) and the surgical outcomes after transcanal endoscopic ear surgery (TEES) for attic cholesteatoma with a classification of anatomical variation of the AES.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case review.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Seventy-four ears (72 patients with early-stage (I or II) attic cholesteatoma) aged between 16 and 85 years (mean: 48.9 yr) who underwent TEES between 2015 and 2017 were analyzed.

INTERVENTION

Tympanoplasty with atticoantrotomy was performed with TEES. TEES was performed using a rigid endoscope with an outer diameter of 2.7 mm.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The tensor fold in the AES anatomical classification, the postoperative patency of the AES evaluated by computer tomography images, and hearing outcomes based on the American Academy of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery criteria were evaluated after TEES for early-stage attic cholesteatoma.

RESULTS

There were 14 (18.9%) ears with a vertical tensor fold orientation, 29 (39.2%) ears with an oblique orientation, and 29 (39.2%) ears with a horizontal orientation. The total postoperative patency rate in the AES was 81.0%, without any significant difference in the anatomical variation in the AES, whereas the rate of preoperative complete tensor fold was 90.5%. Cholesteatoma recurrence was observed in three cases (4.1%), and all recurrent cases had obstructed AES. No significant difference was found in the postoperative air-bone gap regardless of the patency of the AES.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that TEES is useful in restoring ventilation in the AES, resulting in favorable management of cholesteatoma.

Risk stratification in endoscopic type I. tympanoplasty

PURPOSE

Several risk factors were studied in endoscopic type I. tympanoplasty, however, an easy-to-use risk stratification model is still missing.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review, focusing on individual risk factors and middle ear risk index (MERI). Patients who underwent endoscopic type I. tympanoplasty were included.

RESULTS

Closed tympanic cavity was succesfully created in 88.1% of the 42 cases, the overall 21,5 dB air-bone gap (ABG) was reduced by 9,8 dB. The average MERI score of the patients was 2.1 ± 1.5. 78.6% of the patients were categorised into the mild, while 21.4% into the moderate risk group. The perforation was considered small in 81.0% of the cases, while large in 19.0%. The size of the perforation and the preoperative ABG, but not the MERI status were the only single predictors of success. Using a risk stratification model that is based on the size of the perforation, the preoperative ABG and MERI status, patients could be referred into two distinct groups of risk: the majority expecting excellent outcomes with maximum one risk factor present, and patients with deteriorated rate of success when having two or three risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic type I. tympanoplasty with underlay perichondrium graft can be performed with good chance of success. However, if more than one risk factors are present, the chance of residual perforation becomes great. In addition to the established risk factors, our results point out that despite its strong correlation with perforation size, ABG may have a predictive role.

Assessment of Pain and Analgesic Use in Children Following Otologic Surgery

OBJECTIVE

To compare postoperative pain and analgesic use in children following transcanal endoscopic ear surgery (TEES) vs non-transcanal endoscopic ear surgery (non-TEES).

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective case series.

SETTING

Tertiary care center.

METHODS

Surveys using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale and recording the frequency and dosage of consumed analgesics were administered prospectively to caregivers of children undergoing otologic surgery between May 2018 to February 2020. Pain intensity and medication use were recorded twice daily for 6 days, starting on postoperative day 0. Mean pain scores and mean number of consumed analgesic doses were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Survey response rate was 57.9%. Among 53 patients who completed the survey, 35 (66.0%) underwent TEES and 18 (34.0%) underwent non-TEES. Mean pain ratings on postoperative days 0 and 1 were significantly lower among children undergoing TEES (2.2 and 2.1) vs non-TEES (4.0 and 4.1), P = .045 and P = .008, respectively (Mann-Whitney U test). The mean pain ratings across the 6 days were similar in TEES (1.7) and non-TEES (2.6) (P = .140, Mann-Whitney U test). The mean number of analgesic doses consumed per half-day over the 6 days was significantly lower among children undergoing TEES (0.3) vs non-TEES (0.6; P = .049, Mann-Whitney U test).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative pain following TEES and non-TEES in children was overall low. Children undergoing TEES had a small but statistically significant decrease in pain on postoperative days 0 and 1 and decreased use of pain medications compared to non-TEES.

Endoscopic Management of Primary Acquired Cholesteatoma

Endoscopic ear surgery is increasingly accepted as a primary modality for cholesteatoma surgery. A major advantage is the enhanced visualization of the middle ear in traditionally poorly accessible locations by the microscope. We discuss novel techniques for selective mastoid obliteration when a canal wall down mastoidectomy is necessary. Postoperatively, indications for non-echo planar diffusion-weighted imaging MRI versus second-look surgery are discussed. Finally, outcome data for endoscopic versus microscopic ear surgery are reviewed, which show equivalent outcomes regarding residual and recurrent disease, similar rates of complications, decreased pain, and shorter healing time.

The learning curve for endoscopic tympanoplasties: a single-institution experience, in Birmingham, UK

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess whether increasing operative experience results in better surgical outcomes in endoscopic middle-ear surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective single-institution cohort study was performed. Patients underwent endoscopic tympanoplasty between May 2013 and April 2019 performed by the senior surgeon or a trainee surgeon under direct supervision from the senior surgeon. Following data collection, statistical analysis compared success rates between early (learning curve) surgical procedures and later (experienced) tympanoplasties.

RESULTS

In total, 157 patients (86 male, 71 female), with a mean age of 41.6 years, were included. The patients were followed up for an average of 43.2 weeks. The overall primary closure rate was 90.0 per cent.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates an early learning curve for endoscopic ear surgery that improves with surgical experience. Adoption of the endoscopic technique did not impair the success rates of tympanoplasty.

Can endoscopic ear surgery replace microscopic surgery in the treatment of acquired cholesteatoma? A contemporary review

Acquired cholesteatoma leads to significant morbidities while current surgical options remain a challenge. The principles of surgery include complete removal of disease, prevention of recurrence, and restoration of hearing function when possible. Traditionally, this has been performed using microscopes; however, a novel technique using endoscopes offers a new perspective on our understanding of anatomy, pathogenesis and surgical approaches. In recent years, various studies have demonstrated good outcomes with transcanal endoscopic ear surgery (EES) in cholesteatoma surgery. Nevertheless, the use of EES is not universal and remains controversial due to the efficacy of microscopes, specific limitations of endoscopes and the need to learn new skills. This review focuses on recent advances in EES for the treatment of acquired cholesteatoma, benefits, current challenges, and a discussion on the indications and contraindications of EES.

The first Malaysian experience on totally endoscopic ear surgery

Introduction:

Totally endoscopic ear surgery (TEES) is defined as exclusive application of endoscope transcanally in otologic surgery. This study is aimed to highlight indications and ear pathologies for TEES. In addition, intraoperative, early postoperative and delayed postoperative complications of TEES will be also described in this study.

Methodology:

This is a retrospective study of TEES performed by a single experienced and trained otologist in endoscopic ear surgery in a single institution between 1 July 2014 and 31 June 2018. A total of 43 patients were recruited in this study. Sociodemographic information, indications for TEES, ear pathologies, type of surgery performed and complications of TEES were analyzed.

Results:

The indications for TEES comprised middle ear lesion (65.1%), followed by second look surgery (14.0%), external auditory canal lesion (11.6%) and internal acoustic meatus lesion and surgery for conductive hearing loss which were 4.7%. Various external auditory canal pathologies encountered for TEES were ear canal osteoma (4.7%), acquired ear canal stenosis (2.3%) and tumor (4.7%). Regarding middle ear pathologies, limited atticoantral cholesteatoma accounted for most of the cases, 46.5%. Other middle ear lesions included adhesive otitis media (14.0%), recurrent cholesteatoma (14.0%), tumor (4.7%), otosclerosis (2.3%) and ossicular discontinuity (2.3%). Internal acoustic meatus lesion constituted 4.7% of cases. Some 4.7% of cases developed intraoperative complications, while early and delayed complications were 7.0%.

Conclusion:

TEES is a feasible surgical technique for diverse ear pathologies in the otologic specialty. It is also proven to be safe with good surgical outcomes.

Endoscopic approach in second stage ossicular chain reconstruction

PURPOSE

Today limited studies regarding surgical and hearing outcomes in patients undergoing the totally endoscopic ossicular chain reconstruction has been published. The aim of this study is to show the different materials and endoscopic technique used in our experience to perform a second stage endoscopic ossiculoplasty.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients underwent to second stage endoscopic ossiculoplasty has been enrolled in the study. According to the ossicular defect the endoscopic surgical procedures of ossicular chain reconstruction used in our clinical practice were: ossicular chain reconstruction using PORP (13 cases); ossicular chain reconstruction using TORP (11 cases); incus interposition ossiculoplasty (6 cases); cartilage ossiculoplasty (10 cases). Intraoperative and postoperative complications were analyzed. Final hearing recovery at 6 months follow-up was used to evaluate audiological outcomes.

RESULTS

None of the patients developed intraoperative complications. Postoperative TM complications emerged in 5% of cases: one patient (2.5%) presented TM perforation and prosthesis extrusion (TORP) after 3 months follow up. A significative difference between preoperative and postoperative values of AC-PTA, ABG and WRS (p < 0.05 in each case) emerged.

CONCLUSIONS

Different materials and methods can be used for performing an endoscopic ossicular chain reconstruction in order to obtain optimal clinical-audiological outcomes. Endoscopic surgery can be considered a valid alternative technique to traditional microscopic surgery for ossiculoplasty surgery.

Comparison of the Clinical Results of Attic Cholesteatoma Treatment: Endoscopic Versus Microscopic Ear Surgery

Objectives

We aimed to compare clinical outcomes including hearing improvement and cholesteatoma recurrence between endoscopic and conventional microscopic surgeries in patients with attic cholesteatoma.

Methods

We collected data from patients with attic cholesteatoma who were treated using endoscopic (10 patients) and microscopic (10 patients) approaches by a single surgeon. The data were retrospectively reviewed for patient characteristics, intraoperative findings, hearing levels, and follow-up clinical status. Recurrence of the cholesteatoma, improvement of hearing, and operation time were evaluated.

Results

Ossiculoplasty was performed in four patients in the endoscopic group and two patients in the microscopic group. Lempert endaural incision II was used in all the patients in the microscopic group, whereas Lempert I incision was used in all the patients in the endoscopic approach group. There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding hearing improvement and operating time. And, there were no recurrences during the follow-up period in both groups.

Conclusion

The endoscopic approach for the management of attic cholesteatoma is as useful as the microscopic approach.

Endoscopic visualization to the anterior surface of the malleus and tensor tympani tendon in congenital cholesteatoma

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the feasibility of endoscopy in exposing the anterior surface of the malleus and tensor tympani tendon (ASMT) in children with congenital cholesteatoma (CC), and investigated the outcomes of hearing, postoperative complications, and residual or recurrent disease in endoscopic surgical approach cases.

METHODS

A retrospective case review was performed in one tertiary referral center. Twelve children with CC involving the ASMT were recruited, and their medical records were reviewed. All patients underwent either total endoscopic surgery (n = 3) or endoscope-assisted surgery (n = 9), and Potsic staging was adopted to classify CC according to its severity: stage I (n = 8), stage II (n = 2), and stage III (n = 2). The mean follow-up period was 15.5 ± 2.8 months. The visibility of the ASMT by endoscope assistance, audiological results, surgical and postoperative complications, and recidivism of CC were analyzed.

RESULTS

The ASMT was well visualized by endoscope assistance in all cases. No patient showed hearing deterioration at 3 months after surgery, and none experienced residual or recurrent disease during the follow-up period. Postoperative complications were not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Total endoscopic or endoscope-assisted surgery could help surgeons directly visualize the ASMT in children, with negligible risks of hearing deterioration, postoperative complications, and recurrent disease. Our study might suggest that endoscopic ear surgery should be considered in patients with CC in the ASMT.