Otolaryngology resident experience with supraclavicular, submental and other regional flaps in the United States

Clinical Implications of the Submental and Sublingual Arteries in Relation to the Mylohyoid Boutonnière

OBJECTIVE

Mylohyoid musculature may be included in the submental artery flap to protect perforators. However, blood vessels may pass through the mylohyoid muscle and therefore cause bleeding and risk to pedicle or perforator injury when a mylohyoid-containing flap is lifted. The objectives of this study were to identify the prevalence of the submental and sublingual arteries that traverse the mylohyoid and to assess relationships between vasculature transmitted through mylohyoid muscles and mylohyoid boutonnières.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional human cadaveric study.

SETTING

The West Virginia University School of Medicine human gross anatomic laboratories.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A total of 43 intact mylohyoid muscles from 22 cadavers were dissected. The prevalence of submental vasculature perforating the mylohyoid was recorded in addition to the prevalence and contents of mylohyoid boutonnières.

RESULTS

Of 43 mylohyoid muscles, 21 (48.8%) transmitted the submental or sublingual arteries, and 30 (69.1%) possessed boutonnières. One muscle had 2 boutonnières. Of 31 mylohyoid boutonnières, 21 transmitted blood vessels (67.7%). Specifically, 9 transmitted an artery and a vein (29.0%), and 12 transmitted an artery (38.7%). Ten boutonnières (32.3%) were exclusively occupied by fascia.

CONCLUSION

This report identifies the importance of identifying and carefully ligating branches of the submental artery that pierce the mylohyoid during elevation of the submental island flap. This report also identifies that a boutonnière is often present where a submental or sublingual artery is traversing the mylohyoid to supply sublingual glands, tongue, and anterior mandible.

Submental flap practice patterns and perceived outcomes: A survey of 212 AHNS surgeons

OBJECTIVES

To describe American Head and Neck Society (AHNS) surgeon submental flap (SMF) practice patterns and to evaluate variables associated with SMF complications.

METHODS

The design is a cross-sectional study. An online survey was distributed to 782 AHNS surgeons between 11/11/16 and 12/31/16. Surgeon demographics, training, practice patterns and techniques were characterized and evaluated for associations with frequency of SMF complications.

RESULTS

Among 212 AHNS surgeons, 108 (50.9%) reported performing SMFs, of whom 86 provided complete responses. Most surgeons who performed the SMF routinely reconstructed oral cavity defects with the flap (86.1%, n = 74). Thirty-seven surgeons (43.0%) experienced "very few" complications with the SMF. Surgeons who practiced in the United States versus internationally (p = 0.003), performed more total career SMFs (p = 0.02), and routinely reconstructed parotid and oropharyngeal defects (p = 0.04 and p < 0.001) with SMFs were more frequently perceived to have "very few" complications. SMF surgeons reported more perceived complications with the SMF compared to pectoralis major (p = 0.001) and radial forearm free flaps (p = 0.01). However, similar perceived complications were reported between all three flaps when surgeons performed >30 SMF. Among 94 surgeons not performing SMFs, 71.3% had interest in a SMF training course.

CONCLUSIONS

Practice patterns of surgeons performing SMFs are diverse, although most use the flap for oral cavity reconstruction. While 43% of surgeons performing the SMF reported "very few" complications, overall complication rates with the SMF were higher compared to other flaps, potentially due to limited experience with the SMF. Increased training opportunities in SMF harvest and inset are indicated.