Novel treatment for mild and moderate velopharyngeal insufficiency using implantable AlloDerm for posterior pharyngeal wall augmentation and review of surgical repair techniques

Diagnosing and Managing Velopharyngeal Insufficiency in Patients With Cleft Palate After Primary Palatoplasty

Velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) after palatoplasty is caused by improper anatomy preventing velopharyngeal closure and manifests as a hypernasal resonance, audible nasal emissions, weak pressure consonants, compensatory articulation, reduced speech loudness, and nostril or facial grimacing. A multidisciplinary team using multimodal instruments (speech analysis, nasoendoscopy, videofluoroscopy, nasometry, and magnetic resonance imaging) to evaluate velopharyngeal function should manage these patients. Careful monitoring of velopharyngeal function by a speech pathologist remains paramount for early identification of VPI and the perceptual assessment should follow a standardized protocol. The greatest methodology problem in CLP studies has been the use of highly variable speech samples making comparison of published results impossible. It is hoped that ongoing international collaborative efforts to standardize procedures for collection and analysis of perceptual data will help this issue. Speech therapy is the mainstay treatment for velopharyngeal mislearning and compensatory articulation, but it cannot improve hypernasality, nasal emissions, or weak pressure consonants, and surgery is the definitive treatment for VPI. Although many surgical methods are available, there is no conclusive data to guide procedure choice. The goal of this review article is to present a review of established diagnostic and management techniques of VPI.

Metanalysis of alloplastic materials versus autologous fat for injection augmentation pharyngoplasty treatment of velopharyngeal insufficiency

BACKGROUND

Velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) can cause resonance, speech and feeding problems. While reconstructive palatoplasty and surgical pharyngoplasty techniques are the mainstay of treatment for severe VPI, injection augmentation pharyngoplasty offers a minimally invasive approach in patients with mild-to-moderate VPI.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of the literature available on PubMed and Embase from 1990 to 2019 including studies that addressed VPI, incompetence, or dysfunction managed with injection augmentation. Patient demographics, etiology of VPI, injection material, volume of injection, number of injections, complications and both subjective and objective outcomes were recorded.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine studies met our inclusion criteria encompassing 587 patients, ages 3-75 years (mean = 16) who underwent injection pharyngoplasty. Injection materials included glutaraldehyde cross-linked (GAX) collagen (n = 5), calcium hydroxyapatite (n = 36), dextranomer and hyaluronic acid (n = 72) and autologous fat (n = 471). Follow-up averaged 15.4 months (range = 2-60 months). Functional improvements in nasality were recorded in a large proportion of patients (0.79, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.82). However, a greater proportion of patients in the synthetic materials group demonstrated either reduced or resolved hypernasality compared with those receiving autologous fat injections (χ2 = 7.035, n = 91/103 vs. 255/338, p = 0.008). Complete velopharyngeal gap closure post-injection was achieved at a higher frequency with injection of synthetic materials compared with autologous fat (χ2 = 11.270, n = 61/69 vs. 58/91 p = 0.001).r CONCLUSION: Injection pharyngoplasty offers a minimally invasive alternative intervention for treatment of VPI secondary to small velopharyngeal gaps. Patients treated with synthetic materials experienced a greater improvement in velopharyngeal closure and a corresponding improvement in resonance balance.