Impact of cochlear abnormalities on hearing outcomes for children with cochlear implants

[Surgical tactic of cochlear implantation in patients with intraoperative CSF leakage]

Cochlear implantation (CI) is currently the recognized and most promising method of rehabilitation of patients suffering from profound hearing loss and deafness. During the surgical stage of CI, one of the most unpleasant intraoperative features is CSF leakage from the cochlea opening. Most often it occurs in patients with malformations of the inner ear, with temporal bone fractures and with cochlear otosclerosis. The difficulty of choosing the tactics of surgical intervention in these patients is caused by the large variability of the anatomical structures of the inner ear. In the period from 2017 to 2021, 1954 patients underwent CI, of which 83 were patients with cochlea malformations (65 intraoperative CSF leakages), 14 with the temporal bones fractures (2 intraoperative CSF leakage), 12 with cochlear otosclerosis (1 CSF leakage), while 3 spontaneous intraoperative CSF leakages were noted in patients with normal cochlea anatomy and hyperpnumotized temporal bone pyramid and enlarged vestibular aqueduct. The highest risk of intraoperative CSF leakage was observed in patients with inner ear malformations (common cavity - 10, incomplete partition type III - 15) and anomalies of the internal auditory canal - 5 (dilated IAC - more than 8.5 mm in diameter). Moderate risk of intraoperative CSF leakage was typical for patients with incomplete partition type I (15 patients) and type II (25 patients).

A 3-Year Follow-Up and Radiological Analysis of Cochlear Implantation Patients with Cochlear Nerve Deficiency and Modiolar Deficiency-Type Malformations

OBJECTIVE

Cochlear nerve deficiency (CND) is often combined with modiolar deficiency-type inner ear malformations, which cause variable cochlear implantation (CI) outcomes. We aimed to assess the postoperative development of auditory and speech perception in CND patients with modiolar deficiency-type malformations after 3 years of follow-up to determine the factors correlated with CI outcomes.

METHODS

Sixty-seven CND patients with modiolar deficiency-type malformations who underwent CI surgery were retrospectively reviewed. Modiolar deficiency-type malformations included common cavity (CC), cochlear hypoplasia (CH) (including CH-I and CH-II) and incomplete partition-I (IP-I). Categorical auditory performance (CAP) and the infant-toddler meaningful auditory integration scale (MAIS) were used to assess auditory ability. The speech intelligibility rating (SIR) and meaningful use of speech scale (MUSS) were used to assess the speech intelligibility of these CI patients. The CI outcomes were evaluated at 0, 12, 24 and 36 months after implant activation.

RESULTS

All patients demonstrated improvements in auditory ability and speech intelligibility after CI. There were no significant differences in CI outcomes at any time point according to the malformation type. The number of nerve bundles within the internal auditory canal (IAC) showed significant differences at 12, 24 and 36 months after CI ( p < 0.05). Patients with one nerve bundle had relatively poor CI outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

CND patients with modiolar deficiency-type malformations showed continuous improvement in auditory and speech abilities after CI. Compared with malformations, the number of nerve bundles should be given more attention when selecting the side for CI.

Systematic review of cochlear implantation in patients with inner ear malformations

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the outcomes of cochlear implantation in patients with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss due to inner ear malformations (IEMs) when compared to patients without IEMs. We discussed audiological outcomes such as open-set testing, closed-set testing, CAP score, and SIR score as well as postoperative outcomes such as cerebrospinal fluid gusher and incomplete insertion rate associated with cochlear implantation in individuals with IEMs.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Science Direct, Web of Science, Scopus, and EMBASE databases.

REVIEW METHODS

After screening a total of 222 studies, twelve eligible original articles were included in the review to analyze the speech and hearing outcomes of implanted patients with IEMs. Five reviewers independently screened, selected, and extracted data. The "Tool to Assess Risk of Bias in Cohort Studies" published by the CLARITY group was used to perform quality assessment on eligible studies. Systematic review registration number: CRD42021237489.

RESULTS

IEMs are more likely to be associated with abnormal position of the facial nerve, raising the risk of intraoperative complications. These patients may benefit from cochlear implantation, but audiological outcomes may also be less favorable than in individuals without IEMs. Furthermore, due to the risk of cerebrospinal fluid gusher, incomplete insertion of electrodes, and postoperative facial nerve stimulation, surgeons can employ precautionary measures such as preoperative imaging and proper counseling. Postoperative imaging is suggested to be beneficial in ensuring proper electrode placement.

CONCLUSIONS

Cochlear implants (CIs) have the potential to provide auditory rehabilitation to individuals with IEMs. Precise classification of the malformation, preoperative imaging and anatomical mapping, appropriate electrode selection, intra-operative techniques, and postoperative imaging are recommended in this population.

Cochlear Implantation in Pediatric Patients With Enlarged Vestibular Aqueduct: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE(S)

To describe cochlear implantation (CI) outcomes, with speech perception, auditory, language, and parent-reported auditory and speech behaviors, in children with an enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA) and incomplete partition type 2 (IP-II) and compare to control children without inner ear malformations (IEMs) and to determine cerebrospinal fluid gusher rates and effect on outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and CINAHL databases were searched from inception to February 2020. Studies reporting relevant outcomes in children with EVA or EVA + IP-II and controls without IEMs undergoing CI were included. Mean differences in speech perception, auditory, and language scores between cases and controls were meta-analyzed. Gusher rates were determined by proportion meta-analyses.

RESULTS

Of 214 identified articles, 42 met inclusion criteria, evaluating 775 cases and 2,191 controls. Of -cases, 578 (74.6%) had EVA and 197 (25.4%) had EVA + IP-II. Cases showed a significant improvement in speech perception, auditory and language performance, comparable to controls. Parent-reported auditory and speech production behaviors outcomes were positive among cases and comparable to controls. Pooled gusher proportions in EVA and EVA + IP-II cases were 27.7% (95% CI: 17.6-39.1) and 48.6% (95% CI: 28.6-69.0), respectively, with a proportion difference of 20.9% (95% CI: 11.0-30.1). Gusher occurrence did not impact speech perception or language outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Outcomes in children with EVA or EVA + IP-II undergoing CI are favorable and largely comparable to outcomes in children with hearing loss undergoing CI without IEMs. Intraoperative gusher is more prevalent among children with EVA + IP-II as compared to iEVA. Gusher does not influence speech perception and language development outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA Laryngoscope, 2021.