Cost and clinical outcomes of postoperative intensive care unit versus general floor management in head and neck free flap reconstructive surgery patients

Comparative Outcomes for Microvascular Free Flap Monitoring Outside the Intensive Care Unit

OBJECTIVE

There is a trend towards nonintensive care unit (ICU) or specialty ward management of select patients. Here, we examine postoperative outcomes for patients transferred to a general ward following microvascular free flap (FF) reconstruction of the head and neck.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective quality control study.

SETTING

Single tertiary care center.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent FF of the head and neck before and after a change in protocol from immediate postoperative monitoring in the ICU ("Pre-protocol") to the general ward setting ("Post-protocol"). Outcomes included overall length of stay (LOS), ICU LOS, FF compromise, and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

A total of 150 patients were included, 70 in the pre-protocol group and 80 in the post-protocol group. There were no significant differences in age, sex, comorbidities, tumor stage, or type of FF. Mean LOS decreased from 8.18 to 7.68 days (P = .4), and mean ICU LOS decreased significantly from 5.2 to 1.7 days (P < .01). There were no significant differences in postoperative or airway-related complications (P = .6) or FF failure rate (2.9% vs 2.6%, P > .9). There was a non-significant increase in ancillary consults in the post-protocol group (45% vs 33%, P = .13) and a significant increase in rapid response team calls, a nurse-driven safety net for abnormal vitals or mental status (19% vs 3%, P = .003).

CONCLUSION

We show the successful implementation of a protocol shifting care of FF patients from the ICU to a general ward postoperatively, suggesting management on the floor with less frequent flap monitoring is safe and conserves ICU beds. Additional teaching and familiarity with these patients may over time reduce the rapid response calls.