Secondary overtriage of isolated facial trauma

Retrospective Optimization of the Hawkeye Orbital Fracture Prioritization and Evaluation Algorithms for Triaging Ophthalmic Care

Objectives

Many orbital fracture patients are transferred to tertiary care centers for immediate ophthalmology consultation, though few require urgent ophthalmic evaluation or intervention. This overutilizes limited resources and overburdens patients and the health care system with travel and emergency department (ED) expenses. A simple, easy-to-use, clinical decision-making tool is needed to aid local EDs and triage services in effectively identifying orbital fracture patients who need urgent ophthalmic evaluation.

Design

Single center, retrospective cohort study.

Subjects

Orbital fracture patients aged ≥ 18 years who presented to the study institution's emergency department and received an ophthalmology consultation.

Methods

Ocular injuries that required close monitoring or an intervention within the first few hours after presentation were termed urgent. Two Hawkeye Orbital Fracture Prioritization and Evaluation (HOPE) algorithms were developed to identify orbital fracture patients needing urgent evaluation; including 1 algorithm incorporating computerized tomography (CT) scans interpreted by ophthalmology (HOPE+CT). Algorithms were compared with 3 previously published protocols: the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTH), the South Texas Orbital Fracture Protocol (STOP), and Massachusetts Eye and Ear (MEE) algorithms.

Main Outcome Measures

Correct triage of patients with orbital fractures who have urgent ocular or orbital conditions.

Results

In the study institution's ED, 134 adult patients (145 orbits) were seen with orbital fractures in 2019. Eighteen (13.4%) had ocular or orbital conditions categorized as urgent. The HOPE tool resulted in 100% sensitivity and 78.4% specificity. The HOPE+CT tool resulted in 100.0% sensitivity and 94.0% specificity. The UTH algorithm was 91.7% sensitive and 76.5% specific. South Texas Orbital Fracture Protocol and MEE were both 100% sensitive but only 35.1% and 32.8% specific, respectively.

Conclusions

The HOPE and HOPE+CT algorithms were superior or equal to the UTH, STOP, and MEE algorithms in terms of specificity while detecting all urgent cases. Implementation of a triage protocol that uses the HOPE or HOPE+CT algorithms could improve resource utilization and reduce health care costs through identification of orbital fracture patients needing urgent evaluation. An online tool that deploys the HOPE+CT algorithm in a user-friendly interface has been developed and is undergoing prospective validation before public dissemination.

Financial Disclosures

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Interfacility Emergency Department Transfer for Midface Fractures in the United States

PURPOSE

Interfacility hospital transfer for isolated midfacial fractures is common but rarely clinically necessary. The purpose of this study was to generate nationally representative estimates regarding the incidence, risk factors, and cost of transfer for isolated midface fractures.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study using the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample 2018 to identify patients with isolated midface fractures. The primary predictor variable was hospital trauma center designation (Level I, Level II, Level III, and nontrauma center). The primary outcome variable was hospital transfer. Total emergency department (ED) charges were also assessed. Covariates were demographic, medical, injury-related, and hospital characteristics. Descriptive, bivariate, and multiple logistic regression statistics were used to evaluate the incidence and predictors of interfacility transfer.

RESULTS

During the study period, there were 161,022 ED encounters with a midface fracture as primary diagnosis, of which 5,680 were transferred (3.53%). In an unadjusted analysis, evaluation at a nontrauma center, level III trauma center, nonteaching hospital, and numerous demographic, medical, and injury-related variables were associated with transfer (P ≤ .001). In the adjusted model, the strongest independent predictors for hospital transfer were evaluation at a nontrauma center (odds ratio [OR] = 16.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 13.6-19.4), level III trauma center (OR = 13.4, 95% CI = 11.1-16.1) or level II trauma center (OR = 3.25, 95% CI = 2.66-3.98), any Le Fort fracture (OR = 12.0, 95% CI = 10.4-14.0), orbital floor fracture (OR = 3.73, 95% CI = 3.48-4.00), history of cerebrovascular event (OR = 2.74, 95% CI = 2.18-3.45), and cervical spine injury (OR = 5.87, 95% CI = 4.79-7.20) (P ≤ .001). The average ED charge per encounter was $7,206 ± 9,294 for a total nationwide charge of approximately 1.16 billion dollars. Transferred subjects had total ED charges of $97 million, not including additional charges at the recipient hospital.

CONCLUSION

Isolated midface fractures are transferred infrequently, but given the high incidence have substantial healthcare costs. Predictors of transfer were mixed rather than clustered within one variable type, although it is likely that transfers are driven in part by lack of access to maxillofacial specialists given the predominance of hospital covariates. Programs evaluating necessity of transfer and facilitating specialist evaluation in the outpatient setting may reduce healthcare expenditures for these injuries.