In-continuity hepatic resection for advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma

Morbidity and mortality after major liver resection in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Morbidity and mortality after hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma are known to be high. However, reported postoperative outcomes vary, with notable differences between Western and Asian series. We aimed to determine morbidity and mortality rates after major hepatectomy in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and assess differences in outcome regarding geographic location and hospital volume.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed by searching the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases through November 20, 2017. Risk of bias was assessed and meta-analysis and metaregression were performed using a random effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 51 studies were included, representing 4,634 patients. Pooled 30-day and 90-day mortality were 5% (95% CI 3%-6%) and 9% (95% CI 6%-12%), respectively. Pooled overall morbidity and severe morbidity were 57% (95% CI 50%-64%) and 40% (95% CI 34%-47%), respectively. Western studies compared with Asian studies had a significantly higher 30-day mortality, 90-day mortality, and overall morbidity: 8% versus 2% (P < .001), 12% versus 3% (P < .001), and 63% versus 54% (P = .048), respectively. This effect on mortality remained significant after correcting for hospital volume. Univariate metaregression analysis showed no influence of hospital volume on mortality or morbidity, but when corrected for geographic location, higher hospital volume was associated with higher severe morbidity (P = .039).

CONCLUSION

Morbidity and mortality rates after major hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma are high. The Western series showed a higher mortality compared with the Asian series, even when corrected for hospital volume. Standardized reporting of outcomes is necessary. Underlying causes for differences in outcomes between Asian and Western centers, such as differences in treatment strategies, should be further analyzed.

Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: controversies on the extent of surgical resection aiming at cure

BACKGROUND

Hilar cholangiocarcinoma is the most common malignant tumor affecting the extrahepatic bile duct. Surgical treatment offers the only possibility of cure, and it requires removal of all tumoral tissues with adequate resection margins. The aims of this review are to summarize the findings and to discuss the controversies on the extent of surgical resection aiming at cure for hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

The English medical literatures on hilar cholangiocarcinoma were studied to review on the relevance of adequate resection margins, routine caudate lobe resection, extent of liver resection, and combined vascular resection on perioperative and long-term survival outcomes of patients with resectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

RESULTS

Complete resection of tumor represents the most important prognostic factor of long-term survival for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. The primary aim of surgery is to achieve R0 resection. When R1 resection is shown intraoperatively, further resection is recommended. Combined hepatic resection is now generally accepted as a standard procedure even for Bismuth type I/II tumors. Routine caudate lobe resection is also advocated for cure. The extent of hepatic resection remains controversial. Most surgeons recommend major hepatic resection. However, minor hepatic resection has also been advocated in most patients. The decision to carry out right- or left-sided hepatectomy is made according to the predominant site of the lesion. Portal vein resection should be considered when its involvement by tumor is suspected.

CONCLUSION

The curative treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma remains challenging. Advances in hepatobiliary techniques have improved the perioperative and long-term survival outcomes of this tumor.

Surgical strategy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma of the left-side predominance: current role of left trisectionectomy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate recent surgical strategy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) of the left-side predominance.

BACKGROUND

When employing left hemihepatectomy (LH) for HC, vasculobiliary anatomy of the right liver often makes it difficult to achieve a tumor-free margin of the right posterior sectional bile duct (RPSBD). Because left trisectionectomy (LTS) can produce a longer resection margin for the RPSBD, we have expanded the indications for LTS over the last 5 years.

METHODS

Sixty-one consecutive patients underwent left-sided hepatectomy for HC, divided into 2 groups according to the operative periods: period 1 (2001-2007; n = 29) and period 2 (2008-2012; n = 32). Clinicopathological outcomes of the groups were compared. The difference in the length of the resectable RPSBD between LH and LTS was radiologically investigated using multidetector-row computed tomography.

RESULTS

The proportion of LTS increased from 10.3% (3/29) in period 1 to 46.9% (15/32) in period 2. R0 resection rates were also improved in period 2. The most common margin positive site in period 1 was the stump of the proximal bile duct; high rates of positive RPSBD stump were noted after LH. The positive proximal ductal margin ratio decreased significantly in period 2. The difference in the length of resectable RPSBD between LH and LTS was 9.0 ± 1.3 mm. There was no mortality in period 2, even after LTS.

CONCLUSIONS

LTS for HC of the left-side predominance improved R0 resection rates without affecting postoperative mortality. LTS should be aggressively performed in patients with appropriate hepatic function, even if tumors are possibly resectable by LH.

Overall survival peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma: R1 resection with curative intent compared to primary endoscopic therapy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Patients with peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma who undergo R1 resection with curative intent will have an improved survival compared to patients who were not resected.

METHODS

Review of a prospective hepatobiliary database identified 130 patients. Survival was compared using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine patients (61%) were resected while 51 (49%) patients were not. Forty-two patients (54%) had an R0 resection. There was no difference in mean age (69 vs. 67; P = 0.8), BMI (27.8 vs. 27.9; P = 1.0), gender (73% vs. 43% male; P = 0.1), presence of jaundice (77% vs. 64%; P = 0.5), vascular involvement on pre operative imaging (77% vs. 64%; P = 0.5), stent (73.1% vs. 64.3%; P = 0.72), and lobar atrophy (27% vs. 7%, P = 0.2) in the resected versus non-resected patients. All patients underwent chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. After a median follow up of 35.6 months the median OSl for all peri-hilar patients was 16.2 months (95% CI = 11.2-23.4). The median OS for resected patients was 18.9 months (95% CI = 12.5-24.7) versus 5.0 months (95% CI = 0-6.9) for patients not resected (P < 0.001). The only pre-operative predictor of OS was resection (P = 0.041). Vascular invasion, lobar atrophy, and stent placement were not statistically significant predictors.

CONCLUSION

Overall survival is improved in patients undergoing R1 resection and multi-modality therapy compared to patients not resected.

Is adjuvant radiotherapy needed after curative resection of extrahepatic biliary tract cancers? A systematic review with a meta-analysis of observational studies

BACKGROUND

The role for adjuvant radiotherapy (ART) after curative resection in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma remains unclear. Due to the lack of randomized trials, available data comes from single center experiences or data-based population studies with inconclusive results.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of radiotherapy (with or without concurrent chemotherapy) on toxicity and survival of radically resected patients with extrahepatic bile duct cancer (extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder cancer and pure ampullary cancer).

DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION

Eligible studies with data on survival, recurrence and toxicity were retrieved from the MEDLINE, ISI web of science, EMBASE and Cochrane databases from January 1995 to December 2008, to ensure that all ART treatments were performed with conventional 3D techniques. In the absence of randomized controlled-studies, all observational cohort studies (longitudinal and historical) were initially considered. Ten retrospective cohort studies (where the use of concurrent CT was reported only in 2), met all inclusion criteria and were enrolled for final meta-analysis. Hazard ratio (HR) had to be extracted from survival curves using the Tierney et al. methods. MIX 1.7 statistical software was used for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

All studies on ART used conventional 3D-techniques. Patients in the ART cohorts were more likely to have involved surgical margins and positive lymph nodes. For extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma location, ART significantly improved overall survival (HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.48 to 0.78, p<0.001). Meta-analysis was not feasible for gallbladder cancer and ampullary cancer locations. Late radiation-induced toxicity was low (2-9% late obstruction or GI bleeding).

CONCLUSION

In the absence of randomized controlled studies, we found in the present systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies that, patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma treated with adjuvant RT have a significant lower risk of dying compared to patients treated with surgery alone.

Aggressive surgical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma of the left-side predominance: radicality and safety of left-sided hepatectomy

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the clinicopathologic outcomes in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) after left-sided hepatectomy (L-H).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

L-H is indicated as radical surgery for HC, predominantly involving left hepatic duct. However, several reports have demonstrated that L-H often results in tumor-positive margin and unfavorable prognosis compared with right-sided hepatectomy (R-H).

METHODS

A total of 224 patients with HC underwent surgical resection with curative intent at our institution: L-H for Bismuth-Corlette (B-C) type IIIb tumors in 88 patients (39.3%) including 75 left hemihepatectomies and 13 left trisectionectomies, and R-H mainly for B-C type IIIa and IV tumors in 84 patients (37.5%). In this study, clinicopathologic outcomes and perioperative morbidity and mortality rates after L-H were investigated and compared with those after R-H.

RESULTS

Histologically negative margin (R0) resection was achieved in 56 cases (63.6%) with L-H, similar to the results for R-H (58/84, 69.1%). However, the R0 resection rate in L-H cases with portal vein (PV) resection was lower (11/25, 44.0%), and various types of PV reconstruction were required. Proximal ductal stumps and excisional surface at periductal structures were the most common sites of positive margins. However, when curative resection was achieved, 5-year survival was comparable to that in R-H cases. Furthermore, lower mortality was noted in L-H cases, even with left trisectionectomy. Multivariate analysis indicated curability and hepatic artery resection as independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Since L-H is a safe procedure and represents the only curative resectional option for type IIIb tumor, aggressive surgical resection should be performed even in cases with PV involvement, if R0 resection is possible.

Clinical significance of biliary vascular anatomy of the right liver for hilar cholangiocarcinoma applied to left hemihepatectomy

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the influence of confluence pattern of the right posterior sectional bile duct (RPSBD) on clinocopathological outcome in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma who underwent left hemihepatectomy (LH).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Biliary vascular anatomy may affect the cutting line of proximal bile ducts, especially in case of LH, because of the shorter distance from the sectional ramification to the ductal confluence. However, there were few studies as to the relationship between anatomic variation and clinocopathological outcome.

METHODS

A total of 209 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma underwent surgical resection. We retrospectively investigated confluence patterns of the RPSBD in relation to the right portal vein (RPV) by preoperative imaging studies in 63 patients who underwent LH, and classified them into 3 groups (supraportal type: the RPSBD runs cranially around the RPV; infraportal type: the RPSBD runs caudally to the RPV; combined type: one segmental duct runs infraraportally and the other supraportally to the RPV). Furthermore, the effects of these variations on clinocopathological outcome were evaluated.

RESULTS

The supraportal type was observed in 53 cases (84.1%), the infraportal type in 8 cases (12.7%), and the combined type in 2 cases (3.2%). Although most of the clinocopathological features were similar between the groups, positive margin of proximal bile duct was significantly lower in the infraportal group, as compared with the supraportal group. Furthermore, it was noted that there was no incidence of bilioenteric anastomotic leakage in the infraportal group.

CONCLUSIONS

Negative proximal margin and secure reconstruction were more easily achieved in the infraportal group than in the supraportal group. Preoperative evaluation of confluence pattern of RPSBD may be clinically useful for the management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma when applied to left-sided hepatectomy.

Outcome of surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma

To evaluate surgical results and the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy in cases of hilar cholangiocarcinoma, we retrospectively analyzed 27 consecutive patients who underwent surgical resection (eight bile duct resections, 18 bile duct resections plus hepatectomy, one hepatopancreaticoduodenectomy). There was no operative mortality, and the morbidity was 37%. Curative resection (R0 resection) was achieved in 20 (74%) patients. Overall survival at 3 and 5 years was 44% and 27%, significantly higher than that of 47 patients who did not undergo resection (3.5% and 0% at 3 and 5 years, p < 0.0001). Survival of patients with positive margins (R1/2 resection) was poor; there were no 5-year survivors. However, survival was better than that of patients who did not undergo resection (median survival: 22 vs 9 months, p = 0.0007). Univariate analysis identified lymph node metastasis as a negative prognostic factor (p = 0.043). Median survival of patients who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy was significantly longer than that of patients who did not (42 vs. 22 months, p = 0.0428). Resection should be considered as the first option for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. There appears to be a survival advantage even in patients with cancer-positive margins. Adjuvant chemotherapy may increase long-term survival.

Preoperative evaluation with T-staging system for hilar cholangiocarcinoma

AIM: To investigate the clinical value of T-staging system in the preoperative assessment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS: From March 1993 to January 2006, 85 patients who had cholangiocarcinoma diagnosed by operative tissue-biopsy were placed into one of three stages based on the new T-staging system, and it was evaluated the resectability and survival correlated with T-staging.

RESULTS: The likelihood of resection and achieving tumor-free margin decreased progressively with increasing T stage (P < 0.05). The cumulative 1-year survival rates of T1, T2 and T3 patients were 71.8%, 50.8% and 12.9% respectively, and the cumulative 3-year survival rate was 34.4%, 18.2% and 0% respectively; the survival of different stage patients differed markedly (P < 0.001). Median survival in the hepatic resection group was greater than in the group that did not undergo hepatic resection (28 mo vs 18 mo; P < 0.05). The overall accuracy for combined MRCP and color Doppler Ultrasonagraphy detecting disease was higher than that of combined using CT and color Doppler Ultrasonagraphy (91.4% vs 68%; P < 0.05 ). And it was also higher in detecting port vein involvement (90% vs 54.5%; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION: The proposed staging system for hilar cholangiocarcinoma can accurately predict resectability, the likelihood of metastatic disease, and survival. A concomitant partial hepatectomy would help to attain curative resection and the possibility of long-term survival. MRCP/MRA coupled with color Doppler Ultrasonagraphy was necessary for preoperative evaluation of hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Long-term outcome and prognostic factors of patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma

AIM: To evaluate the long-term outcome and prognostic factors of patients with hilar cholangiocarinoma.

METHODS: Ninety-six consecutive patients underwent treatment for malignant hilar bile duct tumors during 1995–2005. Of the 96 patients, 20 were initially treated with surgery (n = 2 R0 / n = 18 R1). In non-operated patients, data analysis was performed retrospectively.

RESULTS: Among the 96 patients, 76 were treated with endoscopic transpapillary (ERC, n = 45) and/or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD, n = 31). The mean survival time of these 76 patients undergoing palliative endoscopic and/or percutaneous drainage was 359 ± 296 d. The mean survival time of patients with initial bilirubin levels > 10 mg/dL was significantly lower (P < 0.001) than patients with bilirubin levels < 10 mg/dL. The mean survival time of patients with Bismuth stage II (n = 8), III (n = 28) and IV (n = 40) was 496 ± 300 d, 441 ± 385 d and 274 ± 218 d, respectively. Thus, patients with advanced Bismuth stage showed a reduced mean survival time, but the difference was not significant. The type of biliary drainage had no significant beneficial effect on the mean survival time (ERC vs PTBD, P = 0.806).

CONCLUSION: Initial bilirubin level is a significant prognostic factor for survival of patients. In contrast, age, tumor stage according to the Bismuth-Corlette classification, and types of intervention are not significant prognostic parameters for survival. Palliative treatment with endoscopic or percutaneous biliary drainage is still suboptimal, new diagnostic and therapeutic tools need to be evaluated.

Could a high resectability rate improve the long-term survival of patients with proximal bile duct cancer?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

This retrospective study was undertaken to evaluate if high resectability rate could improve the long-term outcome of patients with proximal bile duct cancer.

METHODS

Between 1985 and 2001, 50 patients (34 male and 16 female) with proximal bile duct cancer were treated. Thirty-six patients (72%) were considered suitable for surgery, while 14 underwent nonsurgical palliative procedures. Twenty patients had bile duct resection only. Ten patients had Roux-en-Y cholangiojejunostomy with two or three divided segmental hepatic ducts; in 10 patients, the cholangiojejunostomy was performed with four or five divided segmental hepatic ducts. Three patients were treated by palliative transtumoral intubation with Kehr tube. Thirteen patients had bile duct resection plus hepatectomy. Despite the curative intention of the operation, only in 19 (52.7%) patients did the histopathological examination reveal tumor-free margins.

RESULTS

There was no operative mortality. Postoperative morbidity was 25%. Overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival of the entire surgical group was 61%, 22.5%, and 9%, respectively. In the 19 patients treated with curative intent the survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 63.1%, 31.5%, and 15.8%, respectively, while in the group that had palliative treatment it was 45%, 15%, and 0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Only margins free from tumor can guarantee an improvement in long-term outcome. Increasing resectability improves survival and could offer a chance of better long-term survival.

Aggressive surgical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma remains a great challenge to surgeons because of its low resectability, poor survival, and high operative mortality and morbidity.

METHODS

The medical and pathological records of 36 patients with a preoperative diagnosis of 'resectable' hilar cholangiocarcinoma operated on by us between January 1998 and December 2002 were studied. The clinical presentations, operative records, and pathology results were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients (72%) underwent resection with curative intent. Apart from resection of the extrahepatic biliary tree and porta hepatis lymph node dissection, 85% received concomitant en-bloc liver resection and 4% received ex situ liver resection and auto-transplantation. The margin of resection was negative (R0 resection) in 73% of patients, and microscopically positive (R1 resection) in the remaining 27%. The 30-day hospital mortality was 7.6%. Of the patients, 42% had major postoperative complications. The median survival was 20 months, with the longest survival 75 months. The 1-, 3- and 5-year actuarial overall survival rate after resection with curative intent was 77%, 31%, and 12%, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year actuarial overall survival after R0 resection was 84%, 42%, and 16%, respectively. Tumour recurrence occurred in 58% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Aggressive surgery increases the resectability of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. R0 resection provides the only chance of long-term survival of these patients.

Stage does not predict survival after resection of hilar cholangiocarcinomas promoting an aggressive operative approach

INTRODUCTION

Staging systems have been developed to predict survival after resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Notably, they have not been validated nor compared for relative predictive ability.

METHODS

Forty-two patients underwent resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma and have been followed through a prospectively collected database. The tumors were staged using the Bismuth-Corlette, Blumgart, and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) systems, and a significant relationship with survival was sought.

RESULTS

Eleven patients were treated by extrahepatic biliary resection alone, while 31 required extrahepatic biliary resections with in-continuity hepatic resections. All patients underwent adjuvant therapy. To date, 30 patients have died with a mean survival time of 30 months +/- 35.0 (SD). Twelve patients are alive with a mean survival of 90 months +/- 61.8. By regression analysis, none of the staging systems had a significant relationship with survival (Bismuth: P = .64; Blumgart: P = .66; AJCC: P = .31).

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma require in-continuity hepatic resections. Survival after resection promotes an aggressive approach, with cure in as many as 30%. Staging systems should not impact the decision to operate or postoperative management, as all tumors should be aggressively resected and all patients should receive adjuvant treatment.

Diagnosis and treatment for advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma: an analysis of 15 cases

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of the surgical treatment for advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma in order to enhance the resection rate and the curative effect.

METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on the data of 15 patients underwent surgical treatment for advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma, including 7 mid-term cases (4 for Bismuth type IIIa, 3 for IIIb) and 8 late-term cases (Bismuth type IV).

RESULTS: Ten patients underwent successful resection, and 5 received non-surgical internal biliary stent drainage, of which 14 patients were followed-up (93.3%, 14/15), including all the 10 cases in the surgical resection group with the median survival time of 14.2 mo (16 d-32.3 mo). The median survival time for the patients received internal biliary stent drainage was 3.8 mo (1.3-7.2 mo), which was significantly different from that for the patients received surgical resection (t = 2.802, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION: Palliative resection combined with hepatectomy can significantly prolong the survival time of the patients with advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Internal drainage through hepatico-jejunal bridge can enhance the surgical resection rate and decrease the occurrence rate of postoperative biliary fistula.