Resident continuity of care experience: a casualty of ambulatory surgery and current patient admission practices

Integration of Veterans Affairs Medical Centers Into Neurosurgical Residency Programs

Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers serve as a unique training environment for US residency programs. In this study, we aim to explore the scope and details of VA integration into neurosurgery resident training. We used data from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education database to provide an overview of neurosurgery training programs with an active VA affiliation and developed a multi-institutional survey to gather information related to rotation design, operative volume, expectations, and core training values. Of the 116 neurosurgery residency programs, 40 have an active affiliation with a VA medical center (34%). Residents most frequently rotated at the VA during their third postgraduate year, with an average rotation length of 7.5 months (range 2-21). Nearly all programs reported a weekly mix of clinic and operative days (96%), with residents longitudinally following patients throughout their rotations. Attending neurosurgeons from VA-affiliated programs reported operative experience (100%), independent decision-making (89%), and continuity of care (81%) as core values of VA neurosurgery rotations. Surgical volume varied between programs with an average of 13.4 ± 6.4 (SD) cases per month per rotating resident. A significant portion of neurosurgery residency programs in the United States incorporate VA rotations into resident training. Although rotation details vary from program-to-program, shared values include a strong operative experience, independent decision-making, and continuity of care. This analysis provides a comprehensive assessment of VA rotation structure across the country, which is valuable for programs considering implementing a VA rotation into their training program or modifying an existing rotation.

"You Have to Know the End of the Story": Motivations to Follow Up After Transitions of Clinical Responsibility

PURPOSE

Physicians routinely transition responsibility for patient care to other physicians. When transitions of responsibility occur before the clinical outcome is known, physicians may lose opportunities to learn from the consequences of their decision making. Sometimes curiosity about patients does not end with the transition and physicians continue to follow them. This study explores physicians' motivations to follow up after transitioning responsibilities.

METHOD

Using a constructivist grounded theory approach, the authors conducted 18 semistructured interviews in 2016 with internal medicine hospitalist and resident physicians at a single tertiary care academic medical center. Constant comparative methods guided the qualitative analysis, using motivation theories as sensitizing constructs.

RESULTS

The authors identified themes that characterized participants' motivations to follow up. Curiosity about patients' outcomes determined whether or not follow-up occurred. Insufficient curiosity about predictable clinical problems resulted in the choice to forgo follow-up. Sufficient curiosity due to clinical uncertainty, personal attachment to patients, and/or concern for patient vulnerability motivated follow-up to fulfill goals of knowledge building and professionalism. The authors interpret these findings through the lenses of expectancy-value (EVT) and self-determination (SDT) theories of motivation.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants' curiosity about what happened to their patients motivated them to follow up. EVT may explain how participants made choices in time-pressured work settings. SDT may help interpret how follow-up fulfills needs of relatedness. These findings add to a growing body of literature endorsing learning environments that consider task-value trade-offs and support basic psychological needs of autonomy, competency, and relatedness to motivate learning.

Medical Trainee Continuity of Care Following Emergency Department Consultations in a Pediatric Hospital

BACKGROUND

The importance of continuity of care in training is widely recognized; however, a broad-spectrum assessment across all specialties has not been performed.

OBJECTIVE

We assessed the continuity of care provided by trainees, following patient consultations in the emergency department (ED) across all specialties at a large pediatric tertiary care center.

METHODS

Medical records were reviewed to identify patients seen in consultation by a resident or fellow trainee in the ED over a 1-year period, and to determine if the patient followed up with the same trainee for the same condition during the next 6 months.

RESULTS

Resident and fellow trainees from 33 specialties participated in 3400 ED consultations. Approximately 50% (1718 of 3400) of the patients seen in consultation by a trainee in the ED followed up with the same specialty within 6 months, but only 4.1% (70 of 1718) followed up with the same trainee for the same condition. Trainee continuity of care ranged from 0% to 21% among specialties, where specialties with resident clinics (14.4%) have a greater continuity of care than specialties without resident clinics (2.7%, P < .001). Continuity of care did not differ between fellows (4.2%) and residents (4.0%, P = .87), but did differ between postgraduate years for residents (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Trainee continuity of care for ED consultations was low across all specialties and levels of training. If continuity of care is important for patient well-being and trainee education, efforts to improve continuity for trainees must be undertaken.

Use of the Electronic Health Record to Track Continuity of Care in Neurological Surgery Residency

BACKGROUND

Continuity of care in neurological surgery includes preoperative planning, technical and cognitive operative experience, and postoperative follow-up. Determining the extent of continuity of care with duty hour limits is problematic.

OBJECTIVE

We used electronic health record data to track continuity of care in a neurological surgery program and to assess changes in rotation requirements.

METHODS

The electronic health record was surveyed for all dictated resident-neurological surgery patient encounters (excluding progress notes), discharge summaries, and bedside procedures (July 2009-November 2011). Encounters were designated as preoperative, operative, or postoperative and were grouped by postgraduate year (PGY)-1 through PGY-6.

RESULTS

A total of 6382 dictations were reviewed, with 5231 (82.0%) pertinent to neurological surgery. Of the 1469 operative notes, 303 (20.6%) had a record of an encounter with the operating resident in either a postoperative or preoperative setting. Preoperative encounters totaled 10.1% (148 of 1469); postoperative, 5.1% (75 of 1469); and encounters with both were 5.4% (80 of 1469). Continuity of care was as follows: PGY-1, 13.8% (4 of 29); PGY-2, 17.4% (26 of 149); PGY-3, 29.0% (36 of 124); PGY-4, 24.8% (73 of 294); PGY-5, 28.8% (109 of 379); and PGY-6, 11.1% (55 of 494). One of the highest continuity rates was observed in a rotation specifically constructed to enhance continuity of care.

CONCLUSIONS

The electronic health record can be used to track resident continuity of care in neurological surgery. The primary operating resident saw the patient in nonoperative settings, such as general admission, clinic visitation, or consultation in 20.6% (303 of 1469) of cases.