Treatment and prognosis of gastric stump carcinoma in comparison with primary proximal gastric cancer

Epstein-Barr Virus and Clinico-Endoscopic Characteristics of Gastric Remnant Cancers Compared to Proximal Non-Remnant Cancers: A Population-Based Study

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is associated with 5-10% of gastric cancers and is recognized as a distinct molecular subtype. EBV positivity is particularly high in gastric remnant cancer (GRC), which may inform the mode of clinical presentation and findings at endoscopy. Most data are from the East, and the question remains how this applies to a Western cohort. We conducted a population-based study in Central Norway, 2001-2016. Patients with GRC (n = 78) and patients with non-GRC proximally located cancer and available tissue for EBV status (n = 116, control group) were identified from the Norwegian Cancer Registry. Relevant data were collected from the individual patient journals. EBV status was assessed using in situ hybridization. The median latency time from the distal gastrectomy to GRC was 37.6 (range 15.7-68.0) years. GRC more often presented with GI bleeding, 31.0% vs. 16.1%, p = 0.017, and at endoscopy more seldom with an ulcer, 19.7% vs. 38.2%, p = 0.012, or a tumour, 40.8% vs. 66.4%, p < 0.001. For GRC, 18.7% were EBV-positive compared to 6.0% among the controls, p = 0.006. EBV status was not associated with patient age, sex, or Lauren histological type. No difference in long-term survival rates between GRC and controls was found or between EBV-positive vs. -negative GRCs. In conclusion, a higher proportion of GRC cases, compared to controls, are EBV positive, indicating different causative factors. The mode of clinical presentation and findings at endoscopy were more subtle in the patients with GRC.

Identification of prognostic signatures in remnant gastric cancer through an interpretable risk model based on machine learning: a multicenter cohort study

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to develop an individual survival prediction model based on multiple machine learning (ML) algorithms to predict survival probability for remnant gastric cancer (RGC).

METHODS

Clinicopathologic data of 286 patients with RGC undergoing operation (radical resection and palliative resection) from a multi-institution database were enrolled and analyzed retrospectively. These individuals were split into training (80%) and test cohort (20%) by using random allocation. Nine commonly used ML methods were employed to construct survival prediction models. Algorithm performance was estimated by analyzing accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), confusion matrices, five-fold cross-validation, decision curve analysis (DCA), and calibration curve. The best model was selected through appropriate verification and validation and was suitably explained by the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) approach.

RESULTS

Compared with the traditional methods, the RGC survival prediction models employing ML exhibited good performance. Except for the decision tree model, all other models performed well, with a mean ROC AUC above 0.7. The DCA findings suggest that the developed models have the potential to enhance clinical decision-making processes, thereby improving patient outcomes. The calibration curve reveals that all models except the decision tree model displayed commendable predictive performance. Through CatBoost-based modeling and SHAP analysis, the five-year survival probability is significantly influenced by several factors: the lymph node ratio (LNR), T stage, tumor size, resection margins, perineural invasion, and distant metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

This study established predictive models for survival probability at five years in RGC patients based on ML algorithms which showed high accuracy and applicative value.

Gastric remnant cancer and long-term survival in Central Norway 2001 to 2016 - A population-based study

INTRODUCTION

Gastric remnant cancer (GRC) has been defined as a distinct clinical entity and is reported to account for 1-8% of all gastric cancers. We aimed to characterize GRC patients and assess survival in a Western population.

METHODS

Retrospective population-based cohort study including 1217 patients diagnosed with gastric adenocarcinoma in Central Norway 2001-2016. GRCs (n = 78) defined as adenocarcinomas arising in the residual stomach after distal gastrectomy were compared to non-GRC (n = 1139) and to proximal non-GRC (n = 595).

RESULTS

78 (6.4 %) gastric cancers were GRC. The annual number and proportion of GRC declined during the study period (p = 0.003). Median latency from distal gastrectomy to GRC diagnosis was 37.6 years (15.7-68.0) and previous Billroth II reconstruction was most common (87.7%). Compared to controls, GRC patients were more frequently males (83.3%), diagnosed in earlier TNM stages and were older at diagnosis. A smaller proportion of GRC patients received perioperative or palliative chemotherapy, but the R0/R1resection rate of 41.0% was no different from non-GRC patients. Overall median survival for GRC patients irrespective of treatment was 7.0 months, which did not differ from non-GRCs or proximal non-GRC. In multivariate analyses TNM stage and age were independently associated with mortality, whereas GRC per se was not.

CONCLUSIONS

Numbers of GRCs declined during the study period, but the latency between distal gastrectomy and GRC diagnosis was long. GRC patients were more frequently male and older than other gastric cancer patients. GRC was not independently associated with survival after adjusting for TNM stage and tumor location.

Appraisal of gastric stump carcinoma and current state of affairs

Gastric stump carcinoma, also known as remnant gastric carcinoma, is a malignancy arising in the remnant stomach following gastrectomy for a benign or malignant condition. Enterogastric reflux and preexisting risk factors in a patient with gastric cancer are the major contributors to the development of gastric stump carcinoma. The occurrence of gastric stump carcinoma is time-dependent and seen earlier in patients operated on for malignant rather than benign diseases. The tumor location is predominantly at the anastomotic site towards the stomach. However, it can occur anywhere in the remnant stomach. The pattern of lymph node involvement and the type of surgery required is distinctly different compared to primary gastric cancer. Gastric stump carcinoma is traditionally considered a malignancy with a dismal outcome. However, recent advances in diagnostic and therapeutic strategies have improved outcomes. Recent advances in molecular profiling of gastric stump carcinoma have identified distinct molecular subtypes, thereby providing novel therapeutic targets. Also, reports of gastric stump carcinoma following pancreatoduodenectomy and bariatric surgery highlight the need for more research to standardize the diagnosis, staging, and treatment of these tumors. The present review aims to provide an overview of gastric stump carcinoma highlighting the differences in clinicopathological profile and management compared to primary gastric carcinoma.

Surgery for Gastric Remnant Cancer Results in Similar Overall Survival Rates Compared with Primary Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Background

The purpose of this study was to investigate clinical features, prognostic factors, and overall survival (OS) in surgical patients with gastric remnant cancer (GRC).

Methods

A retrospective analysis of patients with gastrectomy for pT1–4 gastric cancer between October 1972 and February 2014 at our institution was performed. Clinical characteristics were compared between patients with GRC and those with primary gastric cancer (PGC). Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to determine the prognostic factors for OS in patients with GRC. A propensity score-matched cohort was used to investigate OS between the GRC and PGC groups.

Results

Of a baseline cohort of 1440 patients, 95 patients with GRC were identified. Patients with GRC underwent more multivisceral resections (p < 0.001) than patients with PGC despite lower tumor stages (p = 0.018); however, R0 resection rates were not significantly different (p = 0.211). The postoperative overall (p = 0.032) and major surgical (p = 0.021) complication rates and the 30-day (p = 0.003) and in-hospital (p = 0.008) mortality rates were higher in patients with GRC. In multivariable analysis, the only prognostic factors for worse OS in GRC were higher tumor stage (p < 0.001) and the occurrence of postoperative complications (p < 0.001). OS between propensity score-matched GRC and PGC groups was not significantly different (p = 0.772).

Conclusions

GRC required more invasive surgery than PGC; however, the feasibility of R0 resection was similar. The prognostic factors of GRC were similar to those of PGC, and OS was not significantly different between both groups. Patients with GRC benefit from extensive surgery when performed with low morbidity and mortality.

Prognosis and clinicopathologic features in patients with gastric stump cancer after curative surgery

Background

Gastric stump ("remnant") cancer is the development of a malignancy related to previous gastric surgery. Prognosis in gastric stump cancer, compared with that in primary gastric cancer, is still controversial.

Methods

From January 1988 to December 2012 at a single medical centre in Taiwan, 105 patients with gastric stump cancer, including 85 with previous peptic ulcer disease and 20 with previous gastric cancer, were analyzed for clinicopathologic characteristics and overall survival (os).

Results

The 5-year os rates for patients with gastric stump cancer and with primary gastric cancer were 51.2% and 54.5% respectively (p = 0.035). Analysis of clinicopathologic characteristics indicated that, compared with patients having primary gastric cancer, those with gastric stump cancer had more lymph node metastasis (p < 0.001) and had been diagnosed at a more advanced stage (p = 0.047). Multivariate analysis with os as an endpoint showed that age [p = 0.015; hazard ratio (hr): 2.300; 95% confidence interval (ci): 1.173 to 4.509], tumour size (p = 0.037; hr: 1.700; 95% ci: 1.031 to 2.801), stromal reaction (p = 0.021; hr: 1.802; 95% ci: 1.094 to 2.969), and pathologic N category (p = 0.001; hr: 1.449; 95% ci: 1.161 to 1.807) were independent predictors in gastric stump cancer. The os rates for patients with gastric stump cancer who previously had gastric cancer or peptic ulcer disease were 72.9% and 50.0% respectively (p = 0.019). The Borrmann classification was more superficial (p = 0.005), lymph node metastases were fewer (p = 0.004), and staging was less advanced (p = 0.025) in patients with gastric stump cancer who previously had gastric cancer than in their counterparts who previously had peptic ulcer disease.

Conclusions

Survival is poorer in patients with gastric stump cancer who previously had peptic ulcer disease than in those who previously had primary gastric cancer. Patients with gastric stump cancer who previously had gastric cancer and could receive curative gastrectomy tended to have a better prognosis because of a more superficial Borrmann classification. Regular follow-up in patients who have undergone gastric surgery is recommended for the early detection of gastric stump cancer.

Conditional survival and recurrence of remnant gastric cancer after surgical resection: A multi-institutional study

The present study was designed to evaluate the dynamic survival and recurrence of remnant gastric cancer (RGC) after radical resection and to provide a reference for the development of personalized follow-up strategies. A total of 298 patients were analyzed for their 3-year conditional overall survival (COS3), 3-year conditional disease-specific survival (CDSS3), corresponding recurrence and pattern changes, and associated risk factors. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and the 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) of the entire cohort were 41.2% and 45.8%, respectively. The COS3 and CDDS3 of RGC patients who survived for 5 years were 84.0% and 89.8%, respectively. The conditional survival in patients with unfavorable prognostic characteristics showed greater growth over time than in those with favorable prognostic characteristics (eg, COS3, ≥T3: 46.4%-83.0%, Δ36.6% vs ≤T2: 82.4%-85.7%, Δ3.3%; P < 0.001). Most recurrences (93.5%) occurred in the first 3 years after surgery. The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage was the only factor that affected recurrence. Time-dependent Cox regression showed that for both OS and DSS, after 4 years of survival, the common prognostic factors that were initially judged lost their ability to predict survival (P > 0.05). Time-dependent logistic regression analysis showed that the AJCC stage independently affected recurrence within 2 years after surgery (P < 0.05). A postoperative follow-up model was developed for RGC patients. In conclusion, patients with RGC usually have a high likelihood of death or recurrence within 3 years after radical surgery. We developed a postoperative follow-up model for RGC patients of different stages, which may affect the design of future clinical trials.

Cryptic Early Gastric Carcinoma in Gastric Stump: Challenges in Diagnostic Evaluation

Partial gastrectomy, performed for any indication, is a well-recognized risk factor for carcinoma developing in the gastric remnant (so-called “gastric stump carcinoma”). In symptomatic patients with gastro-enteric anastomosis, it is a common practice to endoscopically evaluate the patency and the status of the anastomosis and procure biopsy samples when endoscopic abnormalities are noted. We describe a case with Billroth I gastroduodenal anastomosis with oozing and friability at the anastomosis site which was biopsied. The biopsies showed invasive intestinal-type adenocarcinoma. Subsequent completion gastrectomy showed no grossly visible tumor and required extensive initial and additional sampling of the anastomosis and the surrounding stomach to locate a small focus of invasive adenocarcinoma limited to the mucosa (“early gastric carcinoma”). This case illustrates a known complication of partial gastrectomy and highlights challenges in diagnostic evaluation of early gastric carcinoma after gastrectomy.

Outcomes after completion total gastrectomy for gastric remnant cancer: experience from a Canadian tertiary centre

BACKGROUND

There is controversy about the safety and outcomes of completion total gastrectomy (CTG) for gastric adenocarcinoma. We compared a cohort of patients who underwent CTG for gastric remnant cancer (GRC) after partial gastrectomy for benign disease with patients who underwent primary total gastrectomy (PTG) for sporadic gastric cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed a single-institution, prospectively maintained clinical database of patients who had undergone gastrectomy from 2005 to 2016 for demographic, surgical, clinical and tumour pathology data, as well as postoperative, pathologic and oncologic outcomes including complications, length of stay, disease-free survival and overall survival. We used the χ² and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests to compare groups and performed the Mantel-Cox log-rank test for Kaplan-Meier survival estimates. We compared the CTG group to all patients in the PTG group and to a 5:1 propensity-matched PTG cohort.

RESULTS

We analyzed data for 64 patients (9 CTG, 55 PTG). The groups were equivalent at baseline and had similar operative, perioperative treatment and pathologic characteristics. After propensity matching, the reoperation rate for complications was higher after CTG than PTG (22% v. 0%, p = 0.03), but there was no significant difference in the overall complication rate or length of stay. At 5 years, there was no difference in disease-free survival (28% v. 58%, p = 0.4) or overall survival (33% v. 44%, p = 0.7).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that CTG for gastric adenocarcinoma can be undertaken safely a priori with no additional risk of recurrence or death compared to PTG for sporadic gastric cancer.

[Gastric stump carcinoma: frequency, treatment, complications and prognosis]

BACKGROUND

Gastric stump carcinoma develops in the gastric remnant after partial gastrectomy. While the frequency of gastric cancer is declining, the incidence of gastric stump carcinoma has remained stable due to the long latency period. As the surgical treatment of gastric ulcers by partial gastrectomy has become much less important, more and more gastric stump carcinomas develop after oncological resection.

AIM

This study compared the surgical therapy of gastric stump carcinoma with the therapy of primary gastric cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From 2001 to 2014 a total of 24 patients were surgically treated for gastric stump carcinoma in the University Hospital of Heidelberg. In the same time 428 patients underwent resection due to primary gastric cancer. Both groups were analyzed and compared with a focus on preoperative therapy, intraoperative differences, complications and overall survival.

RESULTS

Patients with gastric stump carcinoma were older at disease onset (68 years vs. 62 years, p = 0.003). Compared with primary gastric cancer, patients with gastric stump carcinoma were more often suspected of having lymph node (cN+) involvement (51.4 % vs. 41.7 %, p < 0.001) but neoadjuvant therapy was applied less often (48.7 % vs. 14.3 %, p < 0.01). For resection of gastric stump carcinoma, extended resections were more often necessary (54.5 % vs. 28.2 %, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in mean overall survival between the two patient groups (64.4 months vs. 45.8 months, p = 0.34) CONCLUSION: Despite the differences described, the treatment of gastric stump carcinoma does not essentially differ from that of primary gastric cancer. Carcinomas of the gastric stump are more often locally advanced and in our opinion a neoadjuvant therapy should be applied analogue to gastric cancer even if evidence-based data on this point are limited.

Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of remnant gastric cancer: A single-center retrospective analysis of 90 patients

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of remnant gastric cancer (RGC) is significantly poor. However, the mechanism and some clinical features of RGC have not been fully understood and are still under debate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2000 to January 2014, 90 RGC patients were enrolled in this retrospective study. Patients were divided into two groups according to primary disease. Clinicopathological features and survival outcomes were compared between two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 34 (37.8%) patients were diagnosed with remnant gastric cancer following benign disease (RGCB) and 56 (62.2%) were diagnosed with remnant gastric cancer following malignant disease (RGCM). The mean time interval from the primary operation to the development of RGC was 12.5 ± 13.3 years in all RGC patients. The mean time interval in RGCB was significantly longer than that in RGCM (P < 0.01). The 1-, 2-, and 3- year overall survival rates of all patients were 56.1%, 38.2% and 33.2%, respectively. Univariate analysis indicated that tumor size, curability, histology type, serosa invasion, nodal involvement and distant metastasis were prognostic factors for RGC. The multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that distant metastasis was an independent prognostic factor for RGC.

CONCLUSION

RGC occurred earlier in patients with gastrectomy for primary malignant disease than for primary benign disease, even though the primary disease made no difference to the survival of RGC. Nonetheless, RGC patients experienced dismal overall survival. Therefore, early diagnosis plays a significant role in successfully carrying out curative resection and improving the prognosis for RGC.

[Tubular gastric elongation surgery for high esophageal-gastric anastomosis after resection of esophageal cancer: analysis of 5 cases]

OBJECTIVE

To summarize our experience with tubular gastric elongation surgery for management of insufficient gastric length for high esophageal-gastric anastomosis following esophageal carcinoma resection.

METHODS

From September, 2015 to October 2016, 5 patients with esophageal cancer were treated in our department, including two with cervical esophageal cancer and 3 with thoracic esophageal cancer. The patients with cervical esophageal cancer underwent pharyngeal resection, total laryngectomy, esophageal varus extubation and gastric oropharyngeal anastomosis, and the patients with thoracic esophageal cancer underwent esophageal cancer resection with incisions on the left neck, the right chest and the median abdomen. During the surgery, the length of the stomach was found insufficient to allow routine oropharyngeal anastomosis, and tubular gastric elongation was conducted to extend the tubular stomach to enable successful completion of the surgery.

RESULTS

All the patients recovered smoothly after the surgery and were discharged after 2-3 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Tubular gastric elongation surgery can be a good choice for high esophageal-gastric anastomosis after resection of esophageal cancer in cases of insufficient tubular stomach length or high tension at the anastomosis.

Gastric remnant cancer patients had a better prognosis than upper-third gastric cancer patients in a case-control study after surgical treatment

Background

The aim was to compare the clinicopathological features and prognostic outcomes of gastric remnant carcinoma patients with those of patients with upper-third gastric cancer.

Methods

Clinical data extracted from 112 gastric remnant carcinomas and 367 upper-third gastric cancer patients were analyzed to explore the clinicopathologic differences between two groups. After radical resection, prognostic difference between them was evaluated through a 1:2 matched case-control study.

Results

The pattern of gastric remnant carcinomas showed a male predominance. Undifferentiated type histology, depth at T4 stage and distant metastases were more frequent in gastric remnant carcinomas than in upper-third gastric cancers (P <0.05). The radical resectability of gastric remnant carcinomas was lower and the multi-visceral resectabilitiy was relatively higher than the other group (P = 0.00). Gastric remnant carcinomas trended to have a higher incidence of metastases to either mesojejunum or lower mediastinal lymph nodes than upper-third gastric cancers, but patient survival was not significantly different. In the case-control study, gastric remnant carcinomas had a better prognosis than upper-third gastric cancers after radical resection when the clinicopathologic features and surgical treatment were matched.

Conclusions

Although there was no significant prognostic distinction between gastric remnant carcinomas and upper-third gastric cancer, after radical surgical treatment, patients with the former had an even better prognosis.

Does remnant gastric cancer really differ from primary gastric cancer? A systematic review of the literature by the Task Force of Japanese Gastric Cancer Association

Remnant gastric cancer, most frequently defined as cancer detected in the remnant stomach after distal gastrectomy for benign disease and those cases after surgery of gastric cancer at least 5 years after the primary surgery, is often reported as a tumor with poor prognosis. The Task Force of Japanese Gastric Cancer Association for Research Promotion evaluated the clinical impact of remnant gastric cancer by systematically reviewing publications focusing on molecular carcinogenesis, lymph node status, patient survival, and surgical complications. A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed/MEDLINE with the keywords "remnant," "stomach," and "cancer," revealing 1154 relevant reports published up to the end of December 2014. The mean interval between the initial surgery and the diagnosis of remnant gastric cancer ranged from 10 to 30 years. The incidence of lymph node metastases at the splenic hilum for remnant gastric cancer is not significantly higher than that for primary proximal gastric cancer. Lymph node involvement in the jejunal mesentery is a phenomenon peculiar to remnant gastric cancer after Billroth II reconstruction. Prognosis and postoperative morbidity and mortality rates seem to be comparable to those for primary proximal gastric cancer. The crude 5-year mortality for remnant gastric cancer was 1.08 times higher than that for primary proximal gastric cancer, but this difference was not statistically significant. In conclusion, although no prospective cohort study has yet evaluated the clinical significance of remnant gastric cancer, our literature review suggests that remnant gastric cancer does not adversely affect patient prognosis and postoperative course.

Surgical Resection of Remnant Gastric Cancer Following Distal Gastrectomy: A Retrospective Clinicopathological Study

BACKGROUND

Remnant gastric cancer (RGC) is one of the less prevalent gastric cancers. The purpose of this study was to explore the clinicopathological characteristics and results of the operation of RGC following distal gastrectomy. In particular, we examined factors related to prognosis.

METHODS

Between January 1970 and December 2012, 122 patients with RGC following distal gastrectomy underwent further surgery and were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Initial gastric diseases included benign (49 patients, 40.2 %) and malignant diseases (73 patients, 59.8 %). Reconstructions by initial surgery included Billroth I (80 patients, 65.6 %) and Billroth II (42 patients, 34.4 %). Tumors were located at anastomotic (44 patients, 36.1 %) and nonanastomotic sites (78 patients, 63.9 %). There were 59 patients (48.4 %) classified with pathological (p) stage I, 19 as p stage II (15.6 %), 22 as p stage III (18.0 %), and 22 (18.0 %) as p stage IV. A total of 100 patients (82.0 %) underwent curative resection, and 22 underwent noncurative resection. The number of cases of postoperative morbidity, 90-day mortality, and adjuvant chemotherapy were 23 (18.9 %), 3 (2.5 %), and 20 (16.4 %), respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the prognostic factors of RGC. Multivariate analysis revealed historical periods, pathological venous invasion, curative resection, and postoperative morbidity to be independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

The prognosis of patients with RGC can be improved by aggressively performing curative resection without causing complications.

Prognostic factors and survival in patients with gastric stump cancer

AIM: To elucidate the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of gastric stump cancer (GSC).

METHODS: The clinical data for 92 patients with GSC were collected at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center. The prognostic factors were analyzed with Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS: GSC tended to occur within 25 years following the primary surgery, when the initial disease is benign, whereas it primarily occurred within the first 15 years post-operation for gastric cancer. Patients with regular follow-up after primary surgery had a better survival rate. The multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that Borrmann type I/II (HR = 3.165, 95%CI: 1.055-9.500, P = 0.040) and radical resection (HR = 1.780, 95%CI: 1.061-2.987, P = 0.029) were independent prognostic factors for GSC. The overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of the 92 patients were 78.3%, 45.6% and 27.6%, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of those undergoing radical resection were 79.3%, 52.2%, and 37.8%, respectively. The 5-year survival rates for stages I, II, III, and IV were 85.7%, 47.4%, 16.0%, and 13.3%, respectively (P = 0.005).

CONCLUSION: The appearance of GSC occurs sooner in patients with primary malignant cancer than in patients with a primary benign disease. Therefore, close follow-up is necessary. The overall survival of patients with GSC is poor, and curative resection can improve their prognosis.

Prognostic value of tumor size in patients with remnant gastric cancer: is the seventh UICC stage sufficient for predicting prognosis?

BACKGROUND

The 7th UICC N stage may be unsuitable for remnant gastric cancer (RGC) because the original disease and previous operation usually cause abnormal lymphatic drainage. However, the prognostic significance of the current TNM staging system in RGC has not been studied.

METHODS

Prospective data from 153 RGC patients who underwent curative gastrectomy from Jan 1995 to Aug 2009 were reviewed. All patients were classified according to tumor size (<3 cm as N0;>3&≤5 cm as N1;>5&≤7 cm as N2; and>7 cm as N3). The overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using the Cox proportional hazard model.

RESULTS

Tumor sizes ranged from 1.0 to 15.0 cm (median 5.0 cm). Tumor size, depth of invasion and lymph node (LN) metastasis were significant prognostic factors based on both the univariate and multivariate analyses (P<0.05). In the survival analysis, the seventh edition UICC-TNM classification provided a detailed classification; however, some subgroups of the UICC-TNM classification did not have significantly different survival rates. The combination of the seventh edition T classification and the suggested N classification, with ideal relative risk (RR) results and P value, was distinctive for subgrouping the survival rates except for the IA versus IB and II A versus IIB. A modified staging system based on tumor size, predicted survival more accurately than the conventional TNM staging system.

CONCLUSIONS

In RGCs, tumor size is an independent prognostic factor and a modified TNM system based on tumor size accurately predicts survival.

Gastric stump cancer after distal gastrectomy for benign disease: clinicopathological features and surgical outcomes

PURPOSE

The purpose of the present study was to analyze clinicopathologic features and long-term prognosis of gastric stump cancer (GSC) arising in the remnant stomach 5 years or later after partial gastrectomy for benign disease.

METHODS

We reviewed the results of 176 patients resected with curative intent for GSC at 8 Italian centers belonging to the Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer (GIRCG). The median (range) follow-up time for surviving patients was 71.2 (6-207) months.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-six patients were men, the mean age at the time of diagnosis was 69.2 years, and the great majority (167 cases) underwent Billroth II reconstruction. R0 resection was achieved in 158 (90 %) patients, and in 94 (53 %) lymph node dissection was ≥D2. Postoperative mortality and complication rates were 6.2 and 43.2 %, respectively. T1 tumor was diagnosed in 45 (25 %) cases. Lymph node metastases were evident in 86 patients (49 %). Thirteen patients had involvement of the jejunal mesentery nodes (pJN+); five cases were T2-T3 and eight cases were T4. Overall 5-year survival rate was 53.1 %. Five-year survival rates were 68.1, 37.8, and 33.1 % for pT1, pT2-3, and pT4 tumors, respectively (P = 0.001). Five-year survival rate was 56.5 % for node-negative tumors (pN0), 32.3 % for tumors with nodal metastases without involvement of jejunal mesentery nodes (pN+), and 17.1 % for tumors with involvement of jejunal mesentery nodes (pJN+) (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that an aggressive surgical approach can achieve a satisfactory outcome in GSC.

Survival and surgical outcomes of cardiac cancer of the remnant stomach in comparison with primary cardiac cancer

Background

Although cardiac cancer of the remnant stomach and primary cardiac cancer both occur in the same position, their clinical characteristics and outcomes have not been compared previously. The objective of this study was designed to evaluate the prognosis of cardiac cancer of the remnant stomach in comparison with primary cardiac cancer.

Methods

In this retrospective comparative study, clinical data and prognosis were compared in 48 patients with cardiac cancer of the remnant stomach and 96 patients with primary cardiac cancer who underwent radical resection from January 1995 to June 2007. Clinicopathologic characteristics, survival times, mortality, and complications were analyzed.

Results

The 5-year survival rate was significantly higher in patients with primary cardiac cancer than in those with cardiac cancer of the remnant stomach (28.4% vs. 16.7%, P = 0.035). Serosal invasion, lymph node metastasis and tumor location were independent prognostic factors for survival. Subgroup analysis, however, showed similar survival rates in patients with primary cardiac cancer and cardiac cancer of the remnant stomach without serosal invasion (25.0% vs. 43.8%, P = 0.214) and without lymph node metastasis (25.0% vs. 38.8%, P = 0.255), as well as similar complication rates (20.8% vs. 11.5%, P = 0.138).

Conclusion

Although the survival rates after radical resection in patients with cardiac cancer of the remnant stomach were poorer than in those with primary cardiac cancer, they were similar in survival rates when patients without serosal invasion or lymph node metastasis. Therefore, early detection is an important way to improve overall survival in cardiac cancer of the remnant stomach.

Gastric stump cancer: more than just another proximal gastric cancer and demanding a more suitable TNM staging system

Background. Considerable controversy persists about the biological behavior of gastric stump cancer (GSC). The aim of this study is to clarify if this cancer is just another proximal gastric cancer or if it emerges as a distinctive clinicopathologic entity. Methods. This review of a prospectively collected gastric cancer database identified 73 patients with GSC in a single institution between January 1980 and June 2012 and compared them with 328 patients with proximal gastric cancer (PGC) and 291 patients with esophagogastric junction cancer (EGJC). Results. Patients with GSC were predominantly males. Eighty-three percent of GSC penetrated the subserosal or the serosal layers. The median number of lymph nodes retrieved in GSC patients was significantly lower than in PGC patients or in EGJC patients. Cumulative survival curves were not different between GSC, PGC, or EGJC patients. Unlike that observed in PGC and in EGJC, no significant differences in cumulative survival according to the TNM staging system were observed in GSC cases. Conclusions. The outcome of patients with GSC displayed significant differences when compared to those with other proximal gastric cancers concerning the lack of survival association with the TNM staging system. Therefore a more suitable staging system should be designed for these unique cancers.

A retrospective clinicopathologic study of remnant gastric cancer after distal gastrectomy

INTRODUCTION

Remnant gastric cancer (RGC) is a unique clinical entity with relatively less frequency in gastric cancer series and often reported to be detected at advanced stages and had poor prognosis.

METHODS

A total of 112 patients with RGCs from July 1991 to July 2008 were enrolled in this retrospective analysis.

RESULTS

A total number of 112 cases were composed of 20 (17.8%) differentiated carcinomas and 92 (82.2%) undifferentiated carcinomas. There are 64 (57.1%) patients with tumor at anastomotic site and 48 (42.9%) tumor at nonanastomotic site. The diameter of tumors was ≥4 cm in 83 (74.1%) patients. Borrmann III, IV accounted for 70.5% and 17.8% respectively. Three (2.6%) patients were classified as stage I, 16 as stage II (14.2%), 62 as stage III (55.3%), and 31 (27.6%) as stage IV. Percentage of T4 stage was 57.1%. Distant metastasis rate and lymph node metastasis rate were 27.6% and 58.9%, respectively. There were numerous clinicopathologic differences according to different original disease, initial reconstruction, and tumor location. The median overall survival time was 27.9 months. TNM stage and option of treatments were independent prognostic factors in multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The lifelong annual follow-up endoscopic examinations after the initial gastrectomy and radical resection may help to improve the prognosis of RGCs.

Clinicopathological characteristics and survival difference between gastric stump carcinoma and primary upper third gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

The increased incidence of early gastric cancer in several Asian countries has been associated with an increase in gastric stump carcinoma (GSC) following gastric cancer surgery. The clinicopathological characteristics of GSC remain unclear because of the limited number of patients with GSC.

METHODS

The clinicopathological characteristics, including the 5-year survival rate of patients with GSC following distal gastrectomy (167 patients), were compared with those of patients with primary upper third gastric cancer (PGC; 755 patients). The clinicopathological characteristics of patients with GSC were also compared between those who had initial surgery for gastric cancer (GSC-M group, 78 patients) and for benign lesions (GSC-B group, 89 patients).

RESULTS

The GSC-B group has a greater male/female ratio (13.8 vs. 3.1) and a longer interval between initial gastrectomy and surgery for GSC (31.0 vs. 9.4 years) than the GSC-M group. The 5-year survival rate was not significantly different between the GSC-B group (49.0 %) and the GSC-M group (59.3 %, P = 0.359). A comparison between the GSC group and the PGC group revealed a poorer 5-year survival rate for the GSC group (53.6 %) than the PGC group (78.3 %, P < 0.001), and the same trend was observed even after stratification by the pathological stage.

CONCLUSIONS

Stump carcinoma arises earlier following gastrectomy for malignant disease than for benign disease. The prognosis was poor in patients with GSC compared to those with PGC. Early detection of GSC is necessary and an appropriate follow-up program should be established.

Differences of the lymphatic distribution and surgical outcomes between remnant gastric cancers and primary proximal gastric cancers

BACKGROUND

Although remnant gastric cancer (RGC) following distal gastrectomy is located in the proximal stomach, little is known about the differences of the lymphatic distribution and surgical outcomes between RGC and primary proximal gastric cancer (PGC).

METHODS

Between 1997 and 2008, 1,149 patients underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Of these, 33 (2.9%) RGC patients and 207 (18.5%) PGC patients were treated at our department. We reviewed their hospital records retrospectively.

RESULTS

Compared with the PGC patients, those with RGC had a slightly higher age at onset (p=0.09), higher incidence of undifferentiated cancer (p=0.06), higher incidence of vascular invasion (p=0.09), and higher incidence of T4 (p=0.07). Gastrectomy for RGC involved greater blood loss (p<0.005), longer surgical duration (p=0.01), combined resection, and high incidence of complications. However, the survival rate for RGC patients was similar to that for PGC patients (p=0.67). 2) Patients with RGC had a different pattern of lymph node metastasis compared with that in PGC. Particularly in advanced RGC with pT2-T4 tumors, RGC frequently demonstrated jejunal mesentery lymph node metastases (RGC vs. PGC, 35% vs. 0%) and splenic hilar lymph node metastases (RGC vs. PGC, 17% vs. 10%). The jejunal mesentery lymph node metastases were detected only following Billroth II reconstruction (Billroth I vs. Billroth II, 0% vs. 67%).

CONCLUSION

Although the clinical behaviors of the two gastric cancers were different, the survival rates were similar. The pattern of metastasis indicates that the jejunal mesentery and splenic hilar lymph nodes should be specifically targeted for en bloc resection during complete gastrectomy in RGC.

The pattern of lymph node metastasis and the suitability of 7th UICC N stage in predicting prognosis of remnant gastric cancer

BACKGROUNDS

The original disease and previous operation usually cause abnormal lymphatic drainage of remnant gastric cancer (RGC). We analyzed metastatic lymph nodes (MLNs) of RGCs to explore the pattern of lymphatic metastasis and rational surgical treatment for RGC.

METHODS

Eighty-three RGC patients who underwent radical gastrectomy from July 1991 to July 2008 enrolled in this retrospective analysis.

RESULTS

Original disease, tumor size, Borrmann type, depth of invasion, and histological type were related to an increased risk of lymph node (LN) metastasis (P < 0.05). Multivariate logistic analysis revealed that tumor size and depth of invasion were independent predictive factors of LN metastasis (P < 0.05). In comparison with upper one-third gastric cancer, patients with RGC tended to have a lower incidence of perigastric LN metastasis and higher incidence of metastasis to the mesojejunum and lower mediastinal LNs. A high incidence of MLNs in the No. 14 and mesojejunum was found from the patients who had previously undergone Billroth II reconstruction, while patients after Billroth I reconstruction had higher No. 12 and No. 13 LN metastasis rates. Cut-point survival analysis demonstrated that the most appropriate cutoffs of MLNs were set at 0, 2, 6, and 9. Patients of 0, 1-2, 3-6, 7-9, or ≥10 MLNs presented with median survival time of 37, 35, 24, 13, and 9 month, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative diagnosis of depth of invasion and tumor size can help surgeons to evaluate LN metastasis. The 7th UICC N stage may be unsuitable and should be evaluated and improved in order to help surgeons rationally to estimate N stage of RGC.

Tumors arising at previous anastomotic site may have poor prognosis in patients with gastric stump cancer following gastrectomy

INTRODUCTION

We analyzed the clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes of patients with gastric stump cancer (GSC) to identify important prognostic factors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed clinical reports of 34 patients with GSC treated at Kochi Medical School from 1982 to 2008 to analyze the clinical and pathological factors that influenced patient survival.

RESULTS

The median interval between initial and second operation was 15.8 years; this interval was significantly longer in patients diagnosed originally with benign disease than in those with previous malignant disease. Histologically, the incidence of diffuse-type cancer was significantly prominent in patients with previous benign gastric disease than in those with previous malignant gastric disease. The overall 5-year survival rate was 53.3%, with presence of lymph node metastasis and pathological serosal invasion of the tumor associated with poor survival. The final analysis revealed tumor located at anastomosis, tumor size greater than 5 cm, serosal invasion, the presence of lymph node metastasis, and stage III or higher to be significantly associated with poor survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Follow-up programs after gastrectomy should account for long latency periods of disease. Early detection, attentive observation of anastomotic site, and sufficient surgical resection were important influences on outcome for patients with GSC after Billroth I or Billroth II reconstruction.

Treatment and outcome of patients with gastric remnant cancer after resection for peptic ulcer disease

BACKGROUND

To study the pathology, treatment, and outcome of patients with gastric remnant cancer (GRC) after resection for peptic ulcer disease (PUD).

METHODS

Review of a prospective gastric cancer database identified patients with GRC after gastrectomy for PUD. Clinicopathologic and treatment-related variables were obtained. Multivariate analysis was performed for factors associated with disease-specific survival (DSS).

RESULTS

From January 1985 to April 2010, 4402 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma were treated at our institution and 105 patients (2.4%) had prior gastrectomy for PUD. Prior resections were most often Billroth II (N = 97, 92%). The median time from initial resection to development of GRC was 32 years (3-60 years), and the majority of tumors were located at the gastrointestinal anastomosis (N = 72, 69%). Median DSS was 1.3 years (0.6-2.1 years). Patients who had resection had a significantly better outcome than patients who did not have resection (median DSS 5 vs 0.35 years, P < .0001). Factors associated with DSS on multivariate analysis included advanced T-stage (HR 16.5 (CI 2.2-123.4), P = .0006) and lymph node metastasis (HR 1.1 (CI 1.0-1.2), P < .0001). Stage-specific survival following R0 resection was similar to patients with conventional gastric cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients have a lifetime risk for the development of GRC following resection for PUD. As with conventional gastric cancer, determinants of survival of patients with GRC include advanced T stage and nodal metastasis. Patients with GRC amenable to curative resection exhibit the best DSS and have stage-specific outcomes similar to patients with conventional gastric cancer.

Progression and prognosis of gastric stump cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The incidence of gastric stump cancer (GSC) is increasing. The aim of this study is to determine the clinicopathologic feature and the differences of surgical outcome between GSC after partial gastrectomy for benign diseases (GSC-B) and GSC after partial gastrectomy for malignant tumors (GSC-M).

METHODS

Medical records of 42 patients with GSC-B and 47 patients with GSC-M who underwent surgical treatment were studied and analyzed retrospectively. Clinicopathologic parameters, the 5-year survival rate after operation and prognostic factors, were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

GSC was frequently detected in anastomotic site. Poorly differentiated cancer was common. No difference was found between patients with GSC-B and patients with GSC-M in terms of histologic type, tumor location, and distribution of tumor stage. GSC-B patients had a higher incidence in No. 7, 8, 9 lymph nodes than GSC-M patients. In contrast, the patients with GSC-M had higher incidence of metastasis to jejunal mesentery lymph nodes and No. 10, 11 lymph nodes. The overall 5-year survival rates were 38.1% for GSC-B and 10.4% for GSC-M, with significant difference (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

GSC has a particular pattern in lymph node metastasis and organs invasion. Surgical resection is considered an effective therapeutic strategy for GSC.

Gastric remnant cancer: an old problem with novel concerns

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The patients with cancers in the remnant stomachs after previous partial resections for benign diseases constitute a peculiar subset of the patients with gastric cancer. They are generally at advanced stages on admissions due to disregarding the symptoms related to cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty six patients with cancer arising from the remnant stomach were analyzed. Clinicopathologic features such as age, gender, time interval between the initial operation and diagnosis of gastric remnant cancer, preoperative symptoms, surgical management, and tumor characteristics like size, location, histopathology, depth of invasion, lymph node involvement, presence of distant metastasis, and stages were documented.

RESULTS

None of the cancers were diagnosed by routine surveillance and all the patients were symptomatic at the time of diagnosis. Twenty five patients were qualified for surgery. The resectability rate was 61% (n = 16). The ability to perform a curative resection and tumor location at the anastomotic site were determined as the factors significantly influencing survival (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Curative resection has to be the goal of surgical management in patients with gastric remnant cancer. Concerning clinician should be sceptical about a newly developing cancer in order to detect it in an early stage and enhance resectability.