Robotic-assisted adrenalectomy: what advantages compared to lateral transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy?

[Robotic adrenalectomy-current evidence]

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is worldwide currently considered the gold standard technique for patients suffering from benign lesions. There has been an increasing number of robotic-assisted adrenalectomies in the last decade due to the systematic further development of minimally invasive surgery resulting in the implementation of robot-assisted surgery. Interestingly, the available studies show some perioperative advantages for robotic surgery but overall the current evidence is weak and there are economic aspects that are not negligible. Therefore, further high-quality studies about robotic-assisted adrenalectomy are mandatory to strengthen the current evidence.

Safety and surgical outcomes of robotic adrenalectomy from a 15-year experience at a single institution

Robotic adrenalectomy (RA) has gained significant popularity in the management of adrenal gland diseases. We report our experience at a single tertiary institution and evaluate the safety and surgical outcomes of RA. The data of 122 consecutive patients who underwent RA from October 2009 to December 2022 at Korea University Anam Hospital (Seoul, Korea) were reviewed. There were no perioperative complications. Clinicopathological features and surgical outcomes were retrospectively analyzed through complete chart reviews. Noteworthy findings include the influence of sex, tumor size, and body mass index on operation time, with the female and small tumor groups exhibiting shorter operation times (P = 0.018 and P = 0.009, respectively). Pheochromocytoma was identified as a significant independent risk factor for a longer operation time in the multivariate analysis [odds ratio (OR), 3.709; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.127-12.205; P = 0.031]. A temporal analysis revealed a decreasing trend in mean operation times across consecutive groups, reflecting a learning curve associated with RA adoption. RA is a safe and effective operative technique alternative to laparoscopic adrenalectomy that has favorable surgical outcomes and enhances the convenience of the operation.

How long do we need to reach sufficient expertise with the avatera® robotic system?

PURPOSE

To investigate the learning curve in four basic surgical skills in laparoscopic and robotic surgeries, and evaluate the approximate time needed to reach sufficient expertise in performing these tasks with the avatera® system.

METHODS

Twenty urology residents with no previous experience in dry-lab and robotic surgery were asked to complete four basic laparoscopic tasks (peg transfer, circle cutting, needle guidance, and suturing) laparoscopically and robotically. All participants were asked to complete the tasks first after watching the Uroweb educational material and, second, after undertaking a 2-hour training in robotic and laparoscopic dry-lab. Thereafter, all trainees continued to undertake 2-hour training programs until being able to complete the tasks with the avatera® robot at the desired time. Paired t test and one-way ANOVA test were used to analyze time differences between the groups.

RESULTS

Time needed to complete all tasks either robotically or laparoscopically was significantly less in the second compared to the first attempt for all Groups in each Task. In the robotic dry-lab, time needed to complete the tasks was significantly less than in the laparoscopic dry-lab. A significant effect of previous laparoscopic experience of the participants on the training time needed to achieve most of the goal times was detected.

CONCLUSION

The results of the study highlight the role of previous laparoscopic experience in the training time needed to achieve the performance time goals and demonstrate that the learning curve of basic surgical skills using the avatera® system is steeper than the laparoscopic one.

Comparison of perioperative outcomes between robot-assisted adrenalectomy and laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a propensity score matching analysis

This study aimed to evaluate and compare the perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted adrenalectomy (RAA) and laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) using propensity score matching. This retrospective study included 395 patients who underwent minimally invasive adrenalectomy: 354 who underwent LA and 41 who underwent RAA between February 2015 and March 2023. To mitigate potential confounding factors, 2:1 propensity score matching was conducted based on age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, tumor laterality, and tumor size. Perioperative outcomes and complications were compared between the two groups, and prognostic factors for complications were analyzed. Propensity score matching analysis identified 123 patients, with 82 and 41 in the LA and RAA groups, respectively. Operative time (81.4 ± 26.6 min vs. 83.5 ± 25.9 min, P = 0.675), estimated blood loss (77.7 ± 68.3 mL vs. 83.2 ± 73.9 mL, P = 0.683), and post-operative stay (3.8 ± 1.0 days vs. 4.0 ± 0.9 days, P = 0.211) showed no significant differences between two groups. Intraoperative complications occurred in 8 patients (9.8%) in the LA group, while no patients (0%) experienced intraoperative complications in the RAA group (P = 0.051). In both groups, post-operative complications occurred in 2.4% (P = 1). The only factor contributing to complications after adrenalectomy was tumor size (OR 1.026, 95% CI 1.001-1.051, P = 0.042). RAA exhibited comparable perioperative outcomes and presented an improved intraoperative complication rate compared with LA. Tumor size was the only factor that contributed to complications after adrenalectomy.

Laparoscopic versus robotic lateral transabdominal adrenalectomy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Despite an increased adaptation of robotic adrenalectomy, its advantages over laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) have not been defined. The aim of the study was to compare perioperative outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic lateral transabdominal adrenalectomy using a large single-center experience.

METHODS

This was a retrospective single center study. Within 22 years, patients who underwent laparoscopic and robotic transabdominal lateral adrenalectomy were identified from a prospective institutional review board-approved database. Clinical and perioperative outcomes were compared using Mann-Whitney U and χ2  tests.

RESULTS

There were 190 patients who underwent laparoscopic and 281 patients who underwent robotic transabdominal lateral adrenalectomy. The groups were comparable except for a higher percentage of female patients in the robotic group. For robotic versus LA, operative time and hospital stay were shorter, in addition to less blood loss, conversion to open and margin positivity, for pheochromocytoma and malignant tumors. Morbidity rates were similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the limitations of a retrospective design, this large study demonstrates significant advantages of robotic versus laparoscopic transabdominal lateral adrenalectomy in terms of perioperative outcomes and margin clearance.

Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Adrenalectomy for Large Adrenal Masses: A Multi-Centre Experience in Saudi Arabia

Introduction Advancements in radiological imaging technology have increased the discovery of adrenal incidentalomas. Large adrenal tumors (LATs) are not common, and the likelihood of malignancy increases with tumor size. LATs were defined as tumors larger than four centimeters (cm) with various pathologic diagnoses. Traditionally, open adrenalectomy was considered the gold standard for LATs, but with recent advancements in minimally invasive surgery (MIS), optimum perioperative and long-term outcomes are achievable by the MIS approach. The findings presented in this paper show that even large adrenal masses measuring up to 21 centimeters can be safely removed using a minimally invasive approach. Methodology After Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, we reviewed medical records of adult patients who had adrenalectomies at two Saudi Arabian centers from January 2013 to February 2023. Inclusion criteria were laparoscopic or robotic adrenalectomy and adrenal lesions ≥5cm. Pediatric patients and those with open adrenalectomies were excluded. Pre-surgery, patients had imaging studies to assess mass characteristics. Pheochromocytoma patients received a 2-week adrenergic blocker treatment. Perioperative data including demographics, comorbidities, mass characteristics, surgery details, and follow-up were analyzed using SPSS-23. Patients provided informed consent and had follow-up appointments and imaging. Results Our experience involved 35 patients, 29 of whom received laparoscopic treatment and six of whom underwent robotic surgery. Of the 35 patients, more than half were females (57.1%), with a mean age of 41.7±14.9 years, the youngest and oldest participants being 16 and 73 years of age, respectively. The mean body mass index (BMI) of the participants was in the overweight range (26±6.0 kg/m2). The most common mode of presentation was incidental (42.9%), followed by hypertension (17.1%). Most patients had right-sided adrenal gland involvement (48.6%), with only four patients showing bilateral involvement. Most of the patients were classified as American Society of Anesthesiology score (ASA) 2 (40.0%) or ASA 3 (40.0%). Most of the patients were diagnosed with myelolipoma or adenoma (22.9% each) followed by pheochromocytoma (17.1%). The average estimated blood loss (EBL) was 189.3±354.6 ml for patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery and 80.0 ±34.6 ml for patients who underwent robotic surgery. The average operative room time (ORT) was 220.1±98.7 minutes (min) for laparoscopic surgery and 188.3±10.3 min for robotic surgery. One patient had to be converted from laparoscopic to open surgery due to aortic injury. The average length of stay (LOS) was 9.5±6.7 days for laparoscopic treatment and 5.5±1.9 days for robotic surgery. The mean tumor size in the greatest dimension was 8.0±4.4 cm. Only one patient who underwent unilateral laparoscopy experienced perioperative complications and converted to open surgery; nine patients who underwent unilateral laparoscopy required blood transfusion, and none of the patients who underwent robotic surgery required transfusion. None of the 35 patients experienced a recurrence of their adrenal disease during the mean follow-up period which lasted around 58 months. Conclusion MIS in Saudi Arabia is growing and is a safe method for LATs, with satisfactory surgical results compared to the traditional open surgery approach. It offers advantages in terms of EBL, complications, and disease recurrence.

Exploring the Benefits of a Reduced-Port Approach in Robotic Posterior Retroperitoneoscopic Adrenalectomy: A Comparative Study of the Two-Port and Three-Port Techniques

Background: Robotic adrenalectomy has become a surgical treatment option for benign and selected malignant adrenal diseases. We aimed to evaluate the eligibility of two-port robotic posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (PRA) as an alternative to the conventional three-port technique by comparing their surgical outcomes. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study compared the clinicopathological factors and surgical outcomes among 197 patients who underwent two-port or three-port robotic adrenalectomy between 2016 and 2020 in a single tertiary center. For further evaluation, propensity score matching was performed to reduce the selection bias in population characteristics. Results: Patients were categorized by the number of ports (two-port group, 87; and three-port group, 110). The two-port group compared with the three-port group was significantly older (P = .006) and had a smaller mean tumor size (P = .003) and shorter mean operation time (P = .001). Upon comparing clinicopathologic characteristics according to adrenal disorders, for pheochromocytoma, the three-port group had a larger tumor size and a longer operation time. For Cushing's syndrome, the operation time was short and numeric rating scale pain score was significantly low in the two-port group. After propensity score matching, the two-port group had a short operation time and a significantly low postoperative pain score (P < .05). Predictive factors associated with prolonged operation time included male gender, an increased number of ports, and large tumor size. Conclusions: The two-port technique resulted in a shorter operation time and lower pain score compared with the three-port technique. The two-port technique may be a safe alternative to the conventional three-port technique for robotic PRA.

Robotic posterior retroperitoneal adrenalectomy versus laparoscopic posterior retroperitoneal adrenalectomy: outcomes from a pooled analysis

Background

The comparative advantages of robotic posterior retroperitoneal adrenalectomy (RPRA) over laparoscopic posterior retroperitoneal adrenalectomy (LPRA) remain a topic of ongoing debate within the medical community. This systematic literature review and meta-analysis aim to assess the safety and efficacy of RPRA compared to LPRA, with the ultimate goal of determining which procedure yields superior clinical outcomes.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted on databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library database to identify relevant studies, encompassing both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs, that compare the outcomes of RPRA and LPRA. The primary focus of this study was to evaluate perioperative surgical outcomes and complications. Review Manager 5.4 was used for this analysis. The study was registered with PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023453816).

Results

A total of seven non-RCTs were identified and included in this study, encompassing a cohort of 675 patients. The findings indicate that RPRA exhibited superior performance compared to LPRA in terms of hospital stay (weighted mean difference [WMD] -0.78 days, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.46 to -0.10; p = 0.02). However, there were no statistically significant differences observed between the two techniques in terms of operative time, blood loss, transfusion rates, conversion rates, major complications, and overall complications.

Conclusion

RPRA is associated with a significantly shorter hospital stay compared to LPRA, while demonstrating comparable operative time, blood loss, conversion rate, and complication rate. However, it is important to note that further research of a more comprehensive and rigorous nature is necessary to validate these findings.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=453816, identifier CRD42023453816.

Posterior retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy in adults: results from the EUROCRINE® surgical registry

PURPOSE

This study aims to compare posterior retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy (PRLA) and laparoscopic transperitoneal adrenalectomy (LTA) in adults using pan-European data as conflicting results have been published regarding length of hospital stay, institutional volume, and morbidity.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from the surgical registry EUROCRINE®. All patients undergoing PRLA and TLA for adrenal tumours and registered between 2015 and 2020 were included and compared for morbidity, length of hospital stay, and conversion to open surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 2660 patients from 11 different countries and 69 different hospitals were analyzed and 1696 LTA were compared to 964 PRLA. Length of hospital stay was shorter after RPLA, with less patients (N = 434, 45.5%, vs N = 1094, 65.0%, p < 0.001) staying more than 2 days. In total, 96 patients (3.6%) developed a complication Clavien-Dindo grade 2 or higher. No statistical difference was found between both study groups. After propensity score matching, length of hospital stay was shorter after PRLA (> 2 days 45.2% vs 63.0%, p < 0.001). After multivariable logistic regression, factors associated with morbidity were age (OR 1.03), male sex (OR 1.52), and conversion to open surgery (OR 5.73).

CONCLUSION

This study presents the largest retrospective observational analysis comparing LTA and PRLA. Our findings confirm the shorter length of hospital stay after PRLA. Both techniques are safe leading to comparable morbidity and conversion rates.

Adoption of Robotic Adrenalectomy: A Two-Institution Study of Surgeon Learning Curve

BACKGROUND

Robotic adrenalectomy is feasible and safe, yet concerns over increased operative times and the learning curve (LC) for proficiency have limited its adoption. This study aimed to assess the LC for robotic adrenalectomy.

METHODS

This is a two-institution retrospective review of consecutive unilateral minimally invasive adrenalectomies performed by four high-volume adrenal surgeons between 2007 and 2022. Two surgeons transitioned from laparoscopic to robotic adrenalectomy, and two surgeons adopted the approach, with proctoring, after completion of fellowship training without robotic experience. Operative time and complications were analyzed. Multivariable regression was used to identify factors associated with operative time. The number of cases required to overcome the LC was determined using the LC-cumulative-sum (LC-CUSUM) analysis.

RESULTS

Of 457 adrenalectomies, 182 (40%) were laparoscopic and 275 (60%) robotic. The robotic approach was associated with shorter median operative time (106 vs 119 min; p = 0.002), fewer complications (6% vs 13%; p = 0.018), and fewer conversions to open adrenalectomy (1% vs 4%; p = 0.030), with no difference between the senior and junior surgeons. On adjusted analysis, factors associated with increased operative time were male sex (p < 0.001), BMI > 30 kg/m² (p < 0.001), and higher gland weight (p < 0.001). The LC-CUSUM analysis showed proficiency after 8-29 procedures. Compared with the first 10 cases, there was a mean reduction in operative time of 14 min after 10-20 cases, 28 min after 20-30 cases, and 29 min after > 30 cases, regardless of surgeon experience.

DISCUSSION

With dedicated teams and proctoring, robotic adrenalectomy can be safely adopted at high-volume centers with a minimal LC.

Robotic surgery for malignant and large adrenal masses: A doable and safe option

Background

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is currently considered the gold standard method for adrenal surgery. Open surgery is the most frequent technique preferred amongst surgeons who are faced with tumours of larger sizes or challenging lesions. Despite the increasing interest in laparoscopy, most centres still utilise open surgery for challenging adrenal cases.

Patients

and Methods

We retrospectively evaluated our successive 30 robotic adrenalectomies performed in the past 10 years and assigned the patients into 'difficult' and 'easy' groups. Patients with malignant tumours or tumour size of over 8 cm were assigned to the 'difficult group' and others to the 'easy group'. Groups were evaluated according to the demographic features of the patients, side of the operation, the body mass index (BMI) and laparotomy history. The duration of anaesthesia, amount of bleeding during surgery and the hospitalisation periods were also evaluated.

Results

There is no statistically significant difference between the two groups considering age, gender, BMI value, operation side, presence or absence of a laparotomy history, the amount of bleeding during the operation and hospitalisation duration (P > 0.05). The anaesthesia duration was found to be higher in the 'difficult' patient group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Our results present robust evidence to support the idea that robotic adrenalectomy is not only a doable but also a safe option for malignant and large adrenal masses.

Laparoscopic versus robotic adrenalectomy in severely obese patients

BACKGROUND

Over the last 20 years, the prevalence of severe obesity (body mass index ≥ 35 kg/m²) has almost doubled. This condition increases the challenge of laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) by creating problems with instrument reach, adequate exposure, and visualization. The aim was to compare perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus robotic adrenalectomy (RA) in severely obese patients.

METHODS

This was an institutional review board-approved retrospective study. Prospectively collected clinical parameters of patients who underwent LA versus RA between 2000 and 2021 at a single center were compared using Mann-Whitney U, ANOVA, Chi-square, and multivariate regression analysis. Continuous data are expressed as median (interquartile range).

RESULTS

For lateral transabdominal (LT) adrenalectomies, skin-to-skin operative time (OT) [164.5 (71.0) vs 198.8 (117.0) minutes, p = 0.006] and estimated blood loss [26.2 (15.0) vs 72.6 (50.0) ml, p = 0.010] were less in RA versus LA group, respectively. Positive margin rate, hospital stay and 90-day morbidity were similar between the groups (p = NS). For posterior retroperitoneal (PR) approach, operative time and perioperative outcomes were similar between LA and RA groups. Multivariate analysis demonstrated robotic versus laparoscopic technique (p = 0.006) to be an independent predictor of a shorter OT.

CONCLUSION

There was a benefit of robotic over the laparoscopic LT adrenalectomy regarding OT and estimated blood loss. Although limited by the small sample size, there was no difference regarding perioperative outcomes between RA and LA performed through a PR approach.

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy (RARLA): What advantages and disadvantages compared to retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy (RLA)?

OBJECTIVE

To explore the advantages and disadvantages of robot-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy compared with retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy.

METHODS

A total of 101 patients with adrenal tumors who received retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy (RLA) (n=75) or robot-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy (RARLA) (n=26) in our hospital from January 2021 to December 2021 were retrospectively collected. Patients' demographics, tumor characteristics, and perioperative indicators were compared. Statistical analysis was performed using t-test for continuous variables and Pearson chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables.

RESULTS

We found that blood loss in the RARLA group was significantly less than that in the RLA group (66.9 ± 35.5 ml vs 91.5 ± 66.1 ml, p = 0.020). Gastrointestinal function recovery time in RARLA group was significantly less than that in RLA group (19.9 ± 6.9 hours vs 32.0 ± 9.0 hours, p < 0.001). However, the operation time, drainage tube placement time, post-operative hospital stay in the RARLA group were significantly longer compared with the RLA group (149.6 ± 53.4 mins vs 118.7 ± 41.2 mins, p = 0.003; 4.9 ± 2.0 days vs 3.6 ± 1.1 days, p = 0.004; 6.4 ± 1.8 days vs 4.6 ± 1.6 days, p < 0.001). The hospitalization expense in the RARLA group is significantly higher than that in the RLA group (59284 ± 8724 RMB¥ vs 39785 ± 10126 RMB¥, p < 0.001). We found that there was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups. However, the pathological types of the two groups were significantly different. Patients in the RLA group had a higher proportion of adrenocortical adenoma, while patients in the RARLA group had a higher proportion of pheochromocytoma.

CONCLUSION

Compared with traditional laparoscopic adrenalectomy, robot-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy can significantly reduce intraoperative blood loss and accelerate postoperative gastrointestinal recovery. It is committed to studying how to reduce the hospitalization time and hospitalization cost of RARLA, which can make RARLA more widely used.

The new robotic platform Hugo™ RAS for lateral transabdominal adrenalectomy: a first world report of a series of five cases

Robotic assisted surgery is the most rapidly developing field of minimally invasive surgery. Its wide diffusion has led to the development and standardization of robotic-assisted approaches also for adrenalectomy. In this study, we present the first five robotic-assisted lateral transabdominal adrenalectomies performed with the new Hugo RAS™ system (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA). After an official training course of the surgical team, five consecutive patients scheduled for unilateral adrenalectomy, underwent robotic-assisted operations in our institution. Patients that were candidates for partial adrenalectomy were excluded. A description of the operating theatre, robotic arms and docking setup is provided. Four female and one male patient underwent lateral transabdominal adrenalectomy, three for lesions on the left side and two on the right. Median lesion size was 3.9 cm (range: 30-90) and preoperative diagnosis was Cushing's syndrome in three patients, an adrenal cystic lesion and a pheochromocytoma. The median docking time was 5 min (range: 5-8) and the median console time was 55 min (range: 29-108). Procedures were performed without intraoperative complications and no conversions or additional ports were needed. System's function and docking were uneventful. Based on our initial experience, adrenalectomy with the Hugo™ system is feasible. This study provides technical notes for other centres that wish to perform robotic-assisted adrenalectomies with the Hugo™ RAS as well as general information and our preliminary insights on this new platform.

Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of robotic-assisted and laparoscopic in adrenalectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted adrenalectomy (RA) and laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA).

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis of the primary outcomes of interest according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) and AMSTAR (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews) Guidelines. Five databases, including Medline, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science, were systematically searched. The search timeframe was set from the creation of the database to December 2021.

RESULTS

There were 26 studies including 2985 patients. Our study found that the robotic technique was superior to conventional laparoscopy for estimated blood loss (WMD = -18.25, 95% CI [-27.85, -8.65], P < 0.01), length of stay (WMD = -0.45, 95% CI [-0.57, -0.33], P < 0.01), and conversion to open (OR = 0.31, 95% CI [0.12, 0.78], P = 0.01), while complications and readmissions were comparable. Interestingly, there was no difference in operative time between the two surgical modalities, but subgroup analysis found that the retroperitoneal route robotic technique took longer (WMD = 14.64, 95% CI [0.04, 29.24], P < 0.05), whereas the study of the mixed surgical modality (RA versus LA with mixed transabdominal and retroperitoneal surgical routes) found that the robot required less time (WMD = -12.29, 95% CI [-22.86, -1.72], P < 0.05). For pheochromocytoma, RA was superior to LA in terms of length of stay (WMD = -0.49, 95% CI [-0.83, -0.15], P < 0.01), with no difference in other indicators.

CONCLUSION

robotic-assisted adrenalectomy is a superior technique to conventional laparoscopy in managing adrenal tumors, even in the case of a specific adrenal tumor - pheochromocytoma.

[Minimally invasive techniques in adrenal gland surgery]

Today, adrenalectomy can be performed by a variety of laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic approaches. Of particular importance are the lateral transperitoneal and the posterior retroperitoneoscopic access routes. Comparative studies of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal procedures still demonstrate heterogeneous results. Nevertheless, retroperitoneal access techniques seem to enable less postoperative pain and a faster recovery. Robotic procedures are gaining in popularity but the final importance cannot yet be determined. All minimally invasive techniques are considered to be so safe and reliable that open approaches are only justified in exceptional cases.

Robotic Adrenalectomy: An Initial Experience in a Turkish Regional Hospital

Background

Due to the technical advantages and the convenience it provides to surgeons, “robotic adrenalectomy” is a widely used procedure for adrenal surgeries. In this study, we aim to evaluate our robotic adrenalectomy experience and delineate the factors that have a substantial impact on surgical outcomes.

Methods

Successive 0 transperitoneal robotic operations using the daVinci SI® platform were grouped according to the surgery side, malignant or benign pathologies, for adenoma or non-adenoma lesions, tumor size of less than 4 cm or above, body mass index below or above 30 kg/m2, and with or without laparotomy history. Groups were compared in terms of duration of the operations, amount of bleeding, and the duration of hospitalization.

Results

Morbidity developed in 5 patients (16.6%), and no mortality was observed. We had only one conversion to perform open surgery (3.3%). Operations performed for adenoma significantly last longer when compared with the non-adenoma group (p &lt; 0.05). In the malignant group, the amount of bleeding during surgery was found to be significantly higher (p &lt; 0.05). The blood loss during the surgery was also found to be higher in the adenoma group than in the non-adenoma match (p &lt; 0.05). Phenomenally, operative blood loss was found to be lesser in the bigger tumor size group (&gt;4 cm) than in the smaller size group (p &lt; 0.05).

Conclusion

Our results corroborate that robotic adrenalectomy may be more challenging for malignant pathologies and adenomas, but we can claim that it is an effective and safe option for all adrenal gland pathologies.

Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic adrenalectomy: Results from the EUROCRINE Surgical Registry

BACKGROUND

Adrenalectomy is routinely performed via the minimally invasive approach. Safety of adrenalectomy using the robot-assisted technique has been widely demonstrated by several series, but the literature is scarce regarding the comparison of conventional laparoscopic versus robot-assisted approach. We decided to carry out a multicenter study to compare clinical and surgical outcomes between laparoscopic and robotic adrenalectomy.

METHODS

This is a retrospective case-control study, including data from centers affiliated to the Surgical Registry EUROCRINE. Patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for adrenal tumors and registered between 2015 and 2018 were included. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy was compared. All comparisons were carried out in terms of complication rate, conversion rate and duration of stay.

RESULTS

A total of 1,005 patients from 46 clinics underwent robotic or conventional laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Median age was 55 (interquartile range: 45-65) years. Robotic adrenalectomy was performed in 189 (18.8%) patients. According to Clavien-Dindo classification, complication rate was lower in the robotic surgery group (1.6% vs 16.5%, P < .001). Laparoscopic surgery and active hormonal status were significantly correlated with complications, both in univariate and multivariate analysis. There was no significant difference between laparoscopic and robotic surgery groups, in terms of conversion rate (2.1% vs 0.5%, respectively, P = .147). Duration of stay was shorter in the robotic adrenalectomy group (82.1% vs 28.8%, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Analysis of the EUROCRINE database supports that robotic adrenalectomy resulted in a lower complication rate and shorter duration of stay, compared with laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Granular data to support this is warranted.

Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy: Pluriannual Experience in a High-Volume Center Evaluating Indications and Results

Background: Robotic adrenalectomy offers several clinical benefits if compared with laparoscopic adrenalectomy; however, its superiority is still under debate. The aim of this study was the investigation of differences between the two techniques, and a comparison when approaching right or left side adrenal lesions was further conducted. Materials and Methods: All patients undergoing laparoscopic and robotic unilateral adrenalectomy at our institution from January 2006 to December 2019 were collected and retrospectively analyzed. Statistical analysis was conducted; differences between the two cohorts were reported. Results: A total of 160 cases were included (84 patients in laparoscopic adrenalectomy-group [LA-g] 76 cases in robotic adrenalectomy-group [RA-g]). The groups were homogeneous for demographic data. No intraoperative complications were reported; mean amount of intraoperative blood loss was comparable. No cases of conversion to open surgery were required. RA-g presented a longer operative time than LA-g for right adrenalectomy (P = .05), no differences were noted for left side (P = .187). Overall morbidity was 21% for LA-g and 10.5% for RA-g (P = .087), with an inferior rate of surgical complications for RA-g (P = .024), and for robotic left adrenalectomy than robotic right procedure (P = .03). Length of hospital stay was shorter for RA-g (P = .005). Conclusions: Robotic adrenalectomy presents similar outcomes as laparoscopic approach with some benefits for selected cases. Left adrenal lesions seem to receive greater advantages from robotic technique. Large randomized controlled trials are required to determine the role of robotic adrenal surgery and if the indication can be standardized based on the laterality of adrenal procedure.

Robotic renal and adrenal oncologic surgery: A contemporary review

Robot-assisted surgery has evolved over time. Radical nephrectomy with inferior vena cava thrombectomy is feasible and safe for level I, II and III thrombus in high volume centers. Though it is feasible for level IV thrombus, this procedure needs a multi-departmental co-operation. However, the safety of robot-assisted procedures in this subset is still unknown. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy has been universally approved and found oncologically safe. Robotic adrenalectomy has been increasingly utilized for select cases, especially in bilateral tumors and for retroperitoneal adrenalectomy.

An intra-operative video comparison of laparoscopic versus robotic transabdominal lateral adrenalectomy

BACKGROUND

The aim was to compare intraoperative conduct of adrenalectomy between laparoscopic and robotic approaches.

METHODS

Intraoperative video-recordings of patients who underwent robotic (n = 30) and laparoscopic adrenalectomy (n = 30) were analysed using Mann-Whitney U, chi-square and multivariate regression analyses.

RESULTS

Demographics, indications and outcomes were similar between groups. For all tumour sizes, camera was more engaged to surgical task and exhibited less vision problems in robotic versus laparoscopic group. There was less instrument exchange and restriction of exposure with robotic approach. For dissection, robotic approach allowed for a wider range of instrument reach around adrenal. Robotically, there was an increased ability to do fine dissection, rather than en bloc division with rigid laparoscopic vessel sealers. Bleeding problems were less robotically.

CONCLUSION

Despite similarities in post-operative morbidity and hospital stay, there was a superiority in quality of procedure performed with robotic versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy for both small and large adrenal tumours.

Robot-assisted adrenalectomy: state of the art

Currently, laparoscopic adrenalectomy is worldwide considered the gold standard technique. Both transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches have proved their efficacy with excellent outcomes. Since the introduction of da Vinci System (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA), robotic surgery has made many steps forward gaining progressively more diffusion in the field of general and endocrine surgery. The robotic technique offers advantages to overcome some laparoscopic shortcomings (rigid instruments, loss of 3D vision, unstable camera). Indeed, the robotic system is provided of stereoscopic 3D-magnified vision, additional degree of freedom, tremor-filtering technology and a stable camera. Recently, several case series have demonstrated the feasibility and the safety of robot-assisted adrenalectomy in high-volume centers with outcomes comparable to laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Notwithstanding, the technical advantages of the robotic system have not yet demonstrated significant improvements in terms of outcomes to undermine laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Moreover, robotic adrenalectomy harbor inherits drawbacks, such as longer operative time and elevated costs, that limit its use. In particular, the high cost associated with the use of the robotic system is primarily related to the purchase and the maintenance of the unit, the high instruments cost and the longer operative time. Notably, these aspects make robotic adrenalectomy up to 2.3 times more costly than laparoscopic adrenalectomy. This literature review summarizes the current available studies and provides an overview about the robotic scenario including applicability, technical details and surgical outcomes.

Robotic and Laparoscopic Approaches for Adrenal Surgery in Obese Patients

OBJECTIVE

Minimally invasive adrenalectomy is a challenging procedure in obese patients. Few recent studies have advocated against robot-assisted adrenalectomy, particularly in obese patients. This study aims to compare operative outcomes between the robotic and laparoscopic adrenalectomy, particularly in obese patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on all consecutive patients undergoing adrenalectomy for benign disease by a single surgeon using either a laparoscopic or robotic approach. Adrenal surgeries for adrenal cancer were excluded. Demographics, operative time, length of hospital stays, estimated blood loss (EBL), and intraoperative and postoperative complications were evaluated. Patients were divided into 2 groups; obese and nonobese. A sub-analysis was performed comparing robotic and laparoscopic approaches in obese and nonobese patients.

RESULTS

Out of 120, 55 (45.83%) were obese (body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m²). 14 (25.45%) of the obese patients underwent a laparoscopic approach, and 41 (74.55%) underwent a robotic approach. Operative times were longer in the obese vs. nonobese groups (173.30 ± 72.90 minutes and 148.20 ± 61.68 minutes, P = .04) and were associated with less EBL (53.77 ± 82.48 vs. 101.30 ± 122, P = .01). The robotic approach required a longer operative time when compared to the laparoscopic approach (187 ± 72.42 minutes vs. 126.60 ± 54.55 minutes, P = .0102) in the obese but was associated with less blood loss (29.02 ± 51.05 mL vs. 138.30 ± 112.20 mL, P < .01) and shorter hospital stay (1.73 ± 1.23 days vs. 3.17 ± 1.27 days, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Robot-assisted adrenal surgery is safe in obese patients and appears to be longer; however, it provides improvements in postoperative outcomes, including EBL and shorter hospital stay.

Safety and feasibility of reduced-port site surgery for robotic posterior retroperitoneal adrenalectomy

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive surgery, such as laparoscopic adrenalectomy and robotic adrenalectomy, has become a treatment of choice for benign adrenal tumors. Efforts are ongoing to minimize the invasiveness of the procedure and to reduce the number of port sites. The primary endpoint of this study was the safety and feasibility of a reduced-port site technique for robotic posterior retroperitoneal adrenalectomy (RPRA).

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed 74 RPRAs performed by a single surgeon, including 30 conventional three-port site early-phase RPRAs, 30 three-port site late-phase RPRAs, and 14 reduced-port site RPRAs. Reduced-port site RRPA was defined as using two port sites: one for a multi-glove port and one for an additional side port. The clinicopathological features and surgical outcomes were compared in these three groups.

RESULTS

No major complications were observed following RPRA in the three groups of patients. Operation time, pain score, and hospital stay did not differ significantly among these three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

RPRA using a reduced-port site system was safe and feasible and may be a good alternative to conventional three-port site RPRA for benign adrenal tumors in certain situations.

Indocyanine green fluorescence imaging for robotic adrenalectomy

Despite the novel and innovative developments in minimal invasive platforms and the expanding indications regarding adrenal surgery, surgeons are still confronted with some obstacles. The use of intraoperative indocyanine green aims to overcome these problems, but there is still limited data and ongoing debates in terms of robot-assisted adrenal surgery. The aim of this article is to discuss the benefit of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging for robot-assisted adrenalectomy and provide up-to date data.

Single-incision robotic adrenalectomy (SIRA): the future of adrenal surgery?

In compliance with the trend toward less invasive techniques, single incision robotic surgeries have become more common and they have been increasingly used for several surgeries including adrenalectomy. Single incision robotic adrenalectomy (SIRA) aims to combine the merits of robotic surgery with previously defined single incision laparoscopic techniques. It has been shown to be safe and feasible, however, there are only few studies on this new technique. Due to scant data on SIRA in the current literature, it remains to be a current challenge in adrenal surgery. In this review, our goal is to present current literature on SIRA and discuss the data regarding perioperative outcomes, patient selection, learning curve, and its limitations.

Robotic transperitoneal adrenalectomy from inception to ingenuity: the perspective on two high volume endocrine surgery centers

Background

With increased utilization of robotic technology, robotic adrenalectomy (RA) became popular in certain high-volume centers as an alternative to conventional laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA). The aim of the present study was to evaluate clinical and surgical outcomes of RA in two high-volume centers in Turkey.

Methods

Between 2012 and 2019, consecutive patients who underwent robotic transperitoneal adrenalectomy in two referral centers for surgical endocrine diseases in Turkey were analyzed retrospectively.

Results

A total of 111 patients were analyzed. Mean diameter of the tumor in preoperative imaging was 38.6±2.0 mm. Total operation time was 135.4±47.9 min. The analysis of the learning curve period and the post-learning curve period in both centers demonstrated that the total surgery time decreased from 152.68±48.6 to 118.8±37.1 min, and the console time decreased from 113.2±38.9 to 81.6±35.1 min (P<0.0001). In 8 patients, complications arose during the surgery and postoperative complications were observed in 10 patients. Intraoperative complication rate was 28% in patients with a tumor diameter of greater than 50 mm (P<0.0001). There was no mortality.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrated that RA is a safe and effective procedure with low-morbidity and without mortality in high number of cases.

Robotic adrenalectomy in patients with pheochromocytoma: a systematic review

Pheochromocytomas (PHEOs) are neural crest cell tumors producing catecholamines. PHEOS need to be early diagnosed and adequately managed. Adrenalectomy is the gold standard treatment of these type of tumors. There has been major improvement of surgical technologies with the development of laparoscopic and robotic systems these past several years. We conducted a review of the literature to evaluate the robotic approach for adrenalectomy for patients with PHEO.

Robotic-Assisted Retroperitoneoscopic Adrenalectomy: Making a Good Procedure Even Better

Posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (PRA) is a minimally invasive procedure offering several advantages over a transabdominal laparoscopic operation. The three-dimensional optics and articulating instrumentation offered by current robotic surgical technology potentially improve this procedure. Robotic-assisted PRA (RA-PRA) was performed in patients meeting standard criteria for minimally invasive adrenalectomy. We prospectively collected demographic, clinical, perioperative, and pathologic data on patients undergoing RA-PRA. Thirty consecutive RA-PRAs were performed in 28 patients (26 unilateral and 2 bilateral). Indications for adrenalectomy included pheochromocytoma (8), hyperaldosteronism (3), hypercortisolism (8), oligometastases (5), and nonfunctional tumors (6). Mean tumor size was 3.8 ± 1.6 cm. Mean body mass index was 30.7 ± 6.5 kg/m2. Mean operative time was 154 ± 43 minutes for unilateral total adrenalectomy. Four patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia Type 2A-associated pheochromocytomas underwent cortical-preserving procedures. Three patients experienced perioperative complications (one pneumothorax, one urinary retention, one required postoperative blood transfusion). No patient required conversion to an open procedure. Robotic surgical technology is an excellent complement to retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy. The three-dimensional view and ergonomic advantages of a robotic procedure promote better visualization and a more flexible approach to dissection. We believe these features may optimize the ability to maintain a vascularized remnant during minimally invasive cortical-sparing adrenalectomy.

Large Adrenal Lesion Series in a Tertiary Care Center in Northern India: Diagnostic and Operative Challenges

Large adrenal tumors pose varied challenges to surgeons in terms of diagnosis, planning surgical approach, and also intra-operative difficulties in resection. The aim of this study is to discuss challenges in the management of large and difficult adrenal lesions. A retrospective analysis was done on data of all patients with large adrenal lesions/paragangliomas managed from 1 June 2016 to 30 August 2018. Forty-eight patients with adrenal lesions underwent treatment in 2 years duration. Pain in the abdomen was the most common presentation. Mean age was 34.4 years (range 2-60), female to male (23:25) and right to left side to bilateral tumor 30:16:2. Thirty-one (64.6%) patients had large adrenal masses (size > 6 cm). Surgical approaches included open transperitoneal adrenalectomy (n = 20) and laparoscopic transperitoneal (n = 9 and 2 others had conversion to open procedure). Challenges faced are described in the table below: [Table: see text] There were no major peri-operative morbidities, but two patients died in perioperative period. Large adrenal tumors pose a challenge in surgical planning, approach, and resection and need careful planning and multidisciplinary team approach to have the best outcomes.

Retrospective comparison of three minimally invasive approaches for adrenal tumors: perioperative outcomes of transperitoneal laparoscopic, retroperitoneal laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy

Background

To compare the perioperative outcomes of transperitoneal laparoscopic (TLA), retroperitoneal laparoscopic (RLA), and robot-assisted transperitoneal laparoscopic (RATLA) adrenalectomy for adrenal tumors in our center.

Methods

Between April 2012 and February 2018, 241 minimally invasive adrenalectomies were performed. Cases were categorized based on the minimally invasive adrenalectomy technique. Demographic characteristics, perioperative information and pathological data were retrospectively collected and analyzed.

Results

This study included 37 TLA, 117 RLA, and 87 RATLA procedures. Any two groups had comparable age, ASA score, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and preoperative hemoglobin. The tumor size for RLA patients was 2.7 ± 1.1 cm, which was significantly smaller compared to patients who underwent TLA/RATLA (p = 0.000/0.000). Operative time was similar in any two groups, while estimated blood loss was lower for RATLA group (75.6 ± 95.6 ml) compared with the TLA group (131.1 ± 204.5 ml) (p = 0.041). Conversion to an open procedure occurred in only one (2.7%) patient in the TLA group for significant adhesion and hemorrhage. There were no significant differences between groups in terms of transfusion rate and complication rate. Length of stay was shorter for the RATLA group versus the TLA/RLA group (p = 0.000/0.029). In all groups, adrenocortical adenoma and pheochromocytoma were the most frequent histotypes.

Conclusions

Minimally invasive adrenalectomy is associated with expected excellent outcomes. In our study, the RATLA approach appears to provide the benefits of decreased estimated blood loss and length of stay. Robotic adrenalectomy appears to be a safe and effective alternative to conventional laparoscopic adrenalectomy.

Risk factors for complications after robotic adrenalectomy: a review

The application of adrenal surgery has been spreading steadily in recent years. With the increased use of robotics in surgery, robotic adrenalectomy (RA), especially for the posterior retroperitoneoscopic approach, has been taken on by many high-volume institutions as a good option over the standard laparoscopic approach (LA). This paper reviews the recent literature from May 2010 up to November 2019 with the aim of analyzing RA complications in order to identify risk factors for complications after RA. We analyzed 7 principal risk factors for complication: body mass index (BMI), age, tumor size, tumor side, pathology, previous surgery, and surgeon experience. In the review, some studies identified tumor size, malignancy type, completion of learning curve and, and less clearly, previous ipsilateral upper mesocolic or retroperitoneal surgery, as risk factors for postoperative complications and failure of robotic surgery. Whether RA is meaningfully superior to the standard minimally invasive approach is still a subject of discussion. RA appears safer by virtue of its reduction in hospital stay, lower blood loss, and equivalent complication rates, and surgeons should prefer adrenalectomy over the LA. Despite these advantages, the operative time and the overall cost of the robotic procedure are higher than the LA. Further high-quality trials, especially those analyzing the specific risk factors for complications in robotic surgery, should be conducted in order to optimize the stratification of patients eligible for robotic surgery.

Robotic adrenalectomy: evaluation of cost-effectiveness

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) is the preferred treatment option for adrenal lesions, considering the improved patients outcomes, due to the reduced postoperative morbidity and postoperative pain, the faster recovery and the shorter length of hospital stay. The widespread diffusion of robotic technology led to the development and standardization of robot-assisted approach to adrenalectomy. However, to date, no clear benefit from the use of the robot-assisted approach has been found. The higher costs remain an important drawback and limit the implementation of robot-assisted adrenalectomy (RA) programs. This review summarizes the current available data regarding RA including its operative outcomes, advantages and drawbacks in comparison with conventional LA, evaluating its cost-effectiveness.

Nonobstetrical Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery in Pregnancy: A Systematic Literature Review

Urologic and gynecologic surgeons are the top utilizers of robotic surgery; however, nonobstetrical robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) in pregnant patients is infrequent. A systematic literature review was performed to ascertain the frequency, indication and complications of RALS in pregnancy. Results showed 38 pregnancies from eleven publications between 2008 and 2020. Five cases were for urologic indication and 33 for gynecologic indication. Minimal surgical alterations were required. Although no adverse maternal-fetal outcomes were reported, there are not enough cases published to determine safety. This review demonstrates the feasibility of RALS for the pregnant population in the hands of competent robotic surgeons.

Surgery for adrenocortical carcinoma: When and how?

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare malignancy that is frequently asymptomatic at presentation, yet has a high rate of metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis. Prognosis is overall poor, particularly with cortisol-producing tumors. While the treatment of ACC is guided by stage of disease, complete surgical resection is the most important step in the management of patients with primary, recurrent, or metastatic ACC. Triphasic chest, abdomen, and pelvis computer tomography (CT) scans and 18F flourodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography CT scanning are essential for accurate staging; moreover, MRI may be helpful to identify liver metastasis and evaluate the involvement of adjacent organs for operative planning. Surgical resection with negative margins is the single most important prognostic factor for survival in patients with ACC. To achieve the highest rate of R0 resection, open adrenalectomy is the gold standard surgical approach for confirmed or highly suspected ACC. It is extremely important that the tumor capsule is not ruptured, regardless of the surgical approach used. The best post-operative outcomes (complications and oncologic) are achieved by high-volume surgeons practicing at high-volume centers.

Comparing the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic and robotic adrenalectomy: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

PURPOSE

A systematic literature review and a meta-analysis were designed and conducted, in order to provide an up-to-date comparison of the robotic (RA) and laparoscopic (LA) adrenalectomy in terms of perioperative efficacy and safety.

METHODS

The present meta-analysis was completed in accordance with the guidelines provided by the PRISMA study group and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The electronic scholar databases (Medline, Web of Science, Scopus) were screened. For the reduction of type I errors, a trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed.

RESULTS

Overall, 21 studies and 2997 patients were included in this study. RA was associated with a significantly lower open conversion rate (OR: 1.79; 95%CI: 1.10, 2.92) and length of hospitalization (LOS WMD: 0.52; 95%CI: 0.2, 0.84). Marginal results regarding blood loss were recorded (WMD: 2.02; 95%CI: 0.0, 4.03). TSA could not validate the superiority of RA in open conversion rate and blood loss. LA and RA were similar in terms of operative duration (P = 0.18) and positive margin (P = 0.81), complications (P = 0.94) and mortality rate (P = 0.45).

CONCLUSIONS

Even though RA and LA were equivalent regarding perioperative safety, RA was associated with a favorable LOS.

Volume-outcome correlation in adrenal surgery-an ESES consensus statement

BACKGROUND

Published data in the last decade showed that a majority of adrenal operations are done by surgeons performing only one such case per year and based on the distribution of personal workloads 'high-volume' surgeons are defined as those doing 4 or more cases/year.

PURPOSE

This paper summarises literature data identified by a working group established by the European Society of Endocrine Surgeons (ESES). The findings were discussed during ESES-2019 conference and members agreed on a consensus statement.

RESULTS

The annual of adrenal operations performed yearly in individual countries was reported to be 800/year in UK and over 1600/year in France. The learning curve of an individual surgeon undertaking laparoscopic, retroperitoneoscopic or robotic adrenalectomy is estimated to be 20-40 cases. Preoperative morbidity and length of stay are more favourable in high-volume centres.

CONCLUSION

The main recommendations are that adrenal surgery should continue only in centres performing at least 6 cases per year, surgery for adrenocortical cancer should be restricted to centres performing at least 12 adrenal operations per year, and an integrated multidisciplinary team should be established in all such centres. Clinical information regarding adrenalectomies should be recorded prospectively and contribution to the established EUROCRINE and ENSAT databases is strongly encouraged. Surgeons wishing to develop expertise in this field should seek mentorship and further training from established adrenal surgeons.

Therapies targeting the signal pathways of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma

Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PCC/PGL) are rare tumors that originate from adrenal or extra-adrenal chromaffin cells. A significant clinical manifestation of PCC/PGL is that the tumors release a large number of catecholamines continuously or intermittently, causing persistent or paroxysmal hypertension and multiple organ functions and metabolic disorders. Though majority of the tumors are non-metastatic, about 10% are metastatic tumors. Others even have estimated that the rate of metastasis may be as high as 26%. The disease is most common in individuals ranging from 20 to 50 years old and the age of onset strongly depends on the genetic background: patients with germline mutations in susceptible genes have an earlier presentation. Besides, there are no significant differences in the incidence between men and women. At present, traditional treatments, such as surgical treatment, radionuclide therapy, and chemotherapy are still prior choices. However, they all have several deficiencies so that the effects are not extremely significant. Contemporary studies have shown that hypoxia-associated signal pathway, associated with the cluster 1 genes of PCC/PGL, and increased kinase signal pathways, associated with the cluster 2 genes of PCC/PGL, are the two major pathways involving the molecular pathogenesis of PCC/PGL, indicating that PCC/PGL can be treated with targeted therapies in emerging trends. This article reviews the progress of molecular-targeted therapies for PCC/PGL.

The Impact of Body Mass Index on Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic Adrenalectomy: An Update

Background. Robotic surgery has gained increasing popularity over the past 2 decades. However, factors including patient comorbidities and tumor characteristics are still crucial factors for outcomes of surgery. In this study, we evaluated the impact of body mass index (BMI) on perioperative outcomes in patients who underwent robotic adrenal surgery. Methods. Between May 2012 and November 2017, 66 consecutive patients who underwent robotic adrenalectomy were included in this study. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on their BMI: nonobese (<30 kg/m²) and obese (≥30 kg/m²). Additionally, patient demographics, tumor size, total operative time, docking time, console time, estimated blood loss, conversion to open, complications, additional analgesia requirement, length of hospital stay, and rough costs were evaluated. Results. Of the 66 patients, a total of 26 patients were obese (30%). Between study groups, the median BMI was calculated as 26 (18-29) and 33 (30-57). The groups were similar in terms of age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists scores, and previous history of abdominal surgery. Likewise, there were no significant differences between groups regarding total operative time (P = .085), docking time (P = .196), console time (P = .211), estimated blood loss (P = .180), complications (P = .991), length of hospital stay (P = .598), and rough costs (P = .468). Five cases were converted to open surgery. Nonobese cases required additional analgesia (P = .007). We had no unexpected hospitalizations in either group. Conclusion. Guidelines express the advantages of robotic surgery in obese patients. No statistically significant differences were detected between the 2 groups except for the additional analgesia required in nonobese patients.

Robot-assisted urological surgery in the Middle East: Where are we and how far can we go?

Objectives: To evaluate robot-assisted surgery (RAS) in Urology in the Middle East, and its status and future perspectives.

Methods: A Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE) search was performed using the following keywords: ‘robotics’, ‘robot-assisted surgery’, ‘laparoscopy’, at first with each specific procedure name, such as radical cystectomy, followed by ‘Middle East’ and country names. All abstracts and articles in English that adhered to the scope of the current issue were selected, giving special consideration to relevant landmark articles and those describing trends and the future of RAS in Urology.

Results: Only a few index case reports characterised RAS in the Middle East. The Middle East possess only 1% of the da Vinci® Surgical Systems (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) installed worldwide, including 19 in Saudi Arabia; six in Qatar; two in each of Kuwait and Lebanon; three in the United Arab Emirates; and only one in Egypt. The total number of RAS performed in the Middle East is low compared to Europe and the USA. Many countries in the Middle East still lack surgical robots despite having the expertise and appropriate caseload, whilst others seem not to utilise the surgical robot at a suitable rate, as reflected by the sparse number of operated cases and outgoing publications. There are major differences in RAS availability, usage, and perception according to the geographical place of practice and acceptance of robots by surgeons and patients.

Conclusion: RAS in Urology continues to grow in the Middle East, with increasing caseloads and diversity of operated cases. Acceptance of robots by Middle East surgeons is significantly increasing.

Abbreviations: 3D: three-dimensional; KSA: Kingdom Saudi Arabia;MIS: minimally invasive surgery; RAA: robot-assisted adrenalectomy; RAP: robot-assisted pyeloplasty; (O)(RA)PN: (open) (robot-assisted) partial nephrectomy; RAS: robot-assisted surgery; (O)(RA)RC: (open) (robot-assisted) radical cystectomy; (RA)RP: (robot-assisted) radical prostatectomy; SAUC: Sabah Al-Ahmad Urology Center

Comparison of Robotic Posterior Retroperitoneal Adrenalectomy over Laparoscopic Posterior Retroperitoneal Adrenalectomy: A Single Tertiary Center Experience

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of laparoscopic posterior retroperitoneal adrenalectomy (LPRA) and robotic posterior retroperitoneal adrenalectomy (RPRA) and determine the differences that could affect the outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 230 adrenalectomy cases from 2014 to 2017. There were 169 LPRA and 61 RPRA cases, and their clinicopathological features and surgical outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

In LPRA, there was a positive relationship between operation time and male gender, early period of experience, adrenal tumor size, and pheochromocytoma. In RPRA, adrenal tumor size and pheochromocytoma were the factors affecting the operation time. When the adrenal tumor size was ≤5.5 cm, the operation time of LPRA was shorter than that of RPRA (p=0.001). When the tumor size was >5.5 cm, there was no significant difference in the operation times of LPRA and RPRA (p=0.102).

CONCLUSIONS

RPRA is a feasible and technically safe approach for benign adrenal diseases. The use of RPRA could benefit patients and provide comfort by overcoming the factors contributing to a longer operation time in the laparoscopic technique, such as male gender and high BMI.

Robotic Adrenalectomy: Are We Expanding the Indications of Minimally Invasive Surgery?

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) is accepted as the gold standard treatment for most adrenal pathologies. Open surgery is still considered the standard of care for large tumors and malignancies. In the past decade, robotic adrenalectomy (RA) has become an alternative to the laparoscopic and open approaches. The aim of this study was to analyze perioperative and postoperative outcomes in a series of consecutive nonselected patients undergoing a RA, to determine whether factors that negatively affect outcomes in LA (body mass index [BMI], size, and side of the tumor) have the same impact in RA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a single-center single-surgeon retrospective study with 43 patients who underwent a RA. Patients were divided into different groups according to tumor size (cutoff values of 5 or 8 cm), tumor side (left/right), and BMI (cutoff value of kg/m²). Perioperative and postoperative outcomes included operative time, length of hospital stay, blood loss, readmissions, complications, and conversions to open.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the groups with tumors <5 cm versus ≥5 cm regarding gender, age, race, BMI, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, history of previous abdominal surgery, tumor side, and histopathological diagnosis (all P values ≥.06). There were no significant differences in any of the outcomes analyzed with respect to the tumor size (all P values ≥.14) except for a higher occurrence of complications in patients with tumors ≥8 cm versus <8 cm (P = .03). There were no significant differences in any outcomes related to side (left versus right) of the tumor nor BMI (<30 versus ≥30 kg/m²). The overall readmission and conversion rates were both 2.3% and no mortalities were registered.

CONCLUSION

Patient's BMI, tumor side, and size did not demonstrate a negative impact on perioperative and postoperative outcomes of RA. This approach could potentially expand the indications of minimally invasive surgery.