Management of T2 gallbladder cancer: are practice patterns consistent with national recommendations?

Factors that Minimize Curative Resection for Gallbladder Adenocarcinoma: an Analysis of Clinical Decision-Making and Survival

BACKGROUND

Gallbladder adenocarcinoma has a poor prognosis as it is often diagnosed incidentally, and patients have a high risk for residual and occult metastatic disease. Expert guidelines recommend definitive surgery for ≥T1b tumors; however, surgical management is inconsistent. This study evaluates the factors that affect the completion of radical resection with portal lymphadenectomy and its impact on survival.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients who underwent surgery for gallbladder cancer from 2008 to 2017 at an academic institution was performed. Patients were analyzed based on whether they underwent definitive surgical resection. Patient factors and clinical decision-making were analyzed; overall survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

Seventy-five patients with ≥T1b tumors were identified, of who 32 (42.7%) underwent definitive resection. Fifty-four (72%) patients had gallbladder cancer identified as an incidental diagnosis following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Among patients who did not undergo definitive resection, the underlying factors were varied. Only 24 (55.8%) patients in the non-definitive resection group were seen by surgical oncology. Among patients who underwent re-operation for definitive resection, 12 (38.7%) were upstaged on final pathology. Of the 43 patients who did not undergo definitive resection, 4 (9.3%) had metastatic disease identified during attempted re-resection. Patients who underwent definitive resection had a significantly longer median overall survival compared to those who did not (4.3 v. 1.9 years, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing definitive resection have a significantly improved survival, including as part of a re-operative strategy. Universal referral to a surgical specialist is a modifiable factor resulting in increased definitive resection rates.

The optimal extent of surgery in T2 gallbladder cancer and the need for hepatectomy: A meta-analysis

Extensive surgery is the mainstay treatment for gallbladder cancer and offers a long-term survival benefits to the patients. However, the optimal extent of surgery remains debatable. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis of hepatectomy and no hepatectomy approaches in patients with T2 gallbladder cancer. We searched the following electronic databases for systematic literature: PubMed, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library. We selected studies that compared patients with T2 gallbladder cancer who underwent hepatectomy with those who did not. While the long-term overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were the primary outcomes, perioperative morbidity and mortality were the secondary outcome. We analysed over 18 studies with 4,587 patients. Of the total patients, 1,683 and 1,303 patients underwent hepatectomy and no hepatectomy, respectively. The meta-analysis revealed no significant difference between the hepatectomy and no hepatectomy groups, in terms of the overall morbidity (risk ratio [RR] = 1.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.66-5.20) and 30-day mortality (RR = 0.9, 95% CI = 0.1-8.2). The results were comparable in terms of the OS (RR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.57-1.01), (HR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.49-1.12), and DFS (RR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.88-1.11). In conclusion, the perioperative and long-term outcomes of hepatectomy and no hepatectomy approaches were comparable. Hepatectomy may not be required in T2 gall bladder cancer if the preoperative evaluation confirms the depth of the tumour in the perimuscular connective tissue and the intraoperative frozen sections confirm microscopic negative margins. Likewise, for those whom gall bladder cancer was diagnosed from the pathological report after simple cholecystectomy, further hepatectomy may not necessary.

T2 gallbladder cancer shows substantial survival variation between continents and this is not due to histopathologic criteria or pathologic sampling differences

Published data on survival of T2 gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) from different countries show a wide range of 5-year survival rates from 30-> 70%. Recently, studies have demonstrated substantial variation between countries in terms of their approach to sampling gallbladders, and furthermore, that pathologists from different continents apply highly variable criteria in determining stage of invasion in this organ. These findings raised the question of whether these variations in pathologic evaluation could account for the vastly different survival rates of T2 GBC reported in the literature. In this study, survival of 316 GBCs from three countries (Chile n = 137, South Korea n = 105, USA n = 74), all adequately sampled (with a minimum of five tumor sections examined) and histopathologically verified as pT2 (after consensus examination by expert pathologists from three continents), was analyzed. Chilean patients had a significantly worse prognosis based on 5-year all-cause mortality (HR: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.27-2.83, p = 0.002) and disease-specific mortality (HR: 2.41, 95% CI: 1.51-3.84, p < 0.001), compared to their South Korean counterparts, even when controlled for age and sex. Comparing the USA to South Korea, the survival differences in all-cause mortality (HR: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.12-2.75, p = 0.015) and disease-specific mortality (HR: 1.94, 95% CI: 1.14-3.31, p = 0.015) were also pronounced. The 3-year disease-specific survival rates in South Korea, the USA, and Chile were 75%, 65%, and 55%, respectively, the 5-year disease-specific survival rates were 60%, 50%, and 50%, respectively, and the overall 5-year survival rates were 55%, 45%, and 35%, respectively. In conclusion, the survival of true T2 GBC in properly classified cases is neither as good nor as bad as previously documented in the literature and shows notable geographic differences even in well-sampled cases with consensus histopathologic criteria. Future studies should focus on other potential reasons including biologic, etiopathogenetic, management-related, populational, or healthcare practice-related factors that may influence the survival differences of T2 GBC in different regions.

Characteristics and survival prognosis of patients with pure squamous cell carcinoma of the gallbladder

BACKGROUND

Pure squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the gallbladder is rare and often confused with the adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) subtype in previous studies. The present study was attempted to differentiate SCC from ASC by resolving their characteristics and prognosis.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was queried for SCC and ASC of gallbladder cases from 1988 to 2015. Patients' clinicopathological characteristics and survival were analysed between the groups.

RESULTS

Of the 709 patients with primary gallbladder cancer included in this study, 249 (35.1%) had pure SCC and the remaining 460 (64.9%) had ASC. It was found that pure SCC was associated with a larger median tumour size (58.0 versus 41.0 mm, P < 0.001), while ASC presented with a worse histological grade (47.4% versus 37.8% for grades III-IV, P = 0.019) and more lymph node invasion (27.4% versus 18.9%, P = 0.041). The 3-year overall survival and disease-specific survival rates in pure SCC were lower than those in ASC (7.5% versus 11.5% for overall survival, P < 0.001; 6.2% versus 10.9% for disease-specific survival, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that early Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results historic stage, treatment with surgery and chemotherapy were significant favourable prognostic factors for pure SCC, while tumour size, late study period, treatment with surgery and radiotherapy were significant predictors for ASC.

CONCLUSION

There were significant differences in the clinicopathological characteristics and survival prognosis between pure SCC and ASC. Surgery combined with chemotherapy is the preferred treatment option for pure SCC.

Impact of surgical strategies on the survival of gallbladder cancer patients: analysis of 715 cases

Objective

The aim of the study is to evaluate the impact of application of surgical strategies at different cancer stages on the survival of gallbladder cancer (GBC) patients.

Methods

The patients with GBC were divided into 3 groups according to their received surgical strategies: simple resection (full-thickness cholecystectomy for removal of primary tumor site), radical resection (gallbladder bed removal combined with partial hepatectomy), and palliative surgery (treatment at advanced stages). The overall survival (OS) of GBC patients who were received different surgical strategies was compared.

Results

Survival analysis showed that radical resection had a best OS at clinical stage II, and simple resection had a best OS at tumor clinical stage IV. Cox hazard proportional regression analysis showed that more advanced tumor stages, tumor location of gallbladder body or neck, and CA199 ≥ 27 U/mL were the major risk factors for the OS of GBC.

Conclusions

At tumor stage II, radical resection should be the most effective surgical therapy for GBC. However, the effect of radical resection at advanced stages could be restricted. The utilization of radical resection should be increased at tumor stage II for a better long-term survival outcome.

Development and Validation of a Nomogram for Early Detection of Malignant Gallbladder Lesions

OBJECTIVES

Preoperative decision-making for differentiating malignant from benign lesions in the gallbladder remains challenging. We aimed to create a diagnostic nomogram to identify gallbladder cancer (GBC), especially for incidental GBC (IGBC), before surgical resection.

METHODS

A total of 587 consecutive patients with pathologically confirmed gallbladder lesions from a hospital were randomly assigned to a training cohort (70%) and an internal validation cohort (30%), with 287 patients from other centers as an external validation cohort. Radiological features were developed by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression model. Significant radiological features and independent clinical factors, identified by multivariate analyses, were used to construct a nomogram.

RESULTS

A diagnostic nomogram was established by age, CA19.9, and 6 radiological features. The values of area under the curve in the internal and external validation cohorts were up to 0.91 and 0.89, respectively. The calibration curves for probability of GBC showed optimal agreement between nomogram prediction and actual observation. Compared with previous methods, it demonstrated superior sensitivity (91.5%) and accuracy (85.1%) in the diagnosis of GBC. The accuracy using the nomogram was significantly higher in GBC groups compared with that by radiologists in the training cohort (P < 0.001) and similarly in each cohort. Notably, most of the IGBC, which were misdiagnosed as benign lesions, were successfully identified using this nomogram.

DISCUSSION

A novel nomogram provides a powerful tool for detecting the presence of cancer in gallbladder masses, with an increase in accuracy and sensitivity. It demonstrates an unprecedented potential for IGBC identification.

High rate of positive lymph nodes in T1a gallbladder cancer does not translate to decreased survival: a population-based, propensity score adjusted analysis

BACKGROUND

Current consensus guidelines suggest that gallbladder cancer (GBC) patients with resected T1a disease can be observed while patients with T1b or greater lesions should undergo lymphadenectomy (LNE). The primary aim of this study was to critically explore the impact of LNE in early-stage GBC on overall survival (OS) on a population-based level.

METHOD

The 2004-2014 National Cancer Database was reviewed to identify non-metastatic GBC patients with T1a, T1b, or T2 disease and grouped whether a dedicated LNE was performed. OS and relative survival were assessed using Cox proportional hazard regression analyses before and after propensity score adjustments.

RESULTS

4015 patients were included, 246 (6%) had T1a, 654 (16%) T1b, and 3115 (78%) T2 GBC. The rate of positive lymph nodes was 13%, 12%, and 40% for T1a, T1b, and T2 tumors, respectively. Even after propensity score adjustment, no OS benefit was found if LNE was performed for T1a disease (HR:0.63, 95%CI:0.35-1.13) while OS was improved for T1b (HR:0.65, 95%CI:0.49-0.87) and T2 tumors (HR:0.65, 95%CI:0.57-0.73).

CONCLUSION

Despite a higher rate of nodal positivity among patients with T1a disease compared to previous reports, there was no impact on survival and current treatment guidelines appear appropriate for the management of T1a disease.

To Resect or Not to Resect Extrahepatic Bile Duct in Gallbladder Cancer?

The indications for and limitations of extrahepatic bile duct resection (EHBDR) in the context of gallbladder (GB) cancer are unclear. The purpose of this review was to examine the current literature to determine the impact of EHBDR on loco-regional recurrence and survival in GB cancer. The EMBASE and Medline databases were searched up to February 2016 using the terms: extrahepatic bile duct resection and gallbladder cancer. Studies published in the last 20 years were eligible for inclusion. Given the heterogeneity of the population and the study methodologies employed, qualitative data synthesis in the form of meta-analysis was deemed implausible. Twenty-four studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The selected studies include 6,722 (55%) EHBDRs in a total of 12,251 GB cancer operations. The 25 studies were categorized into seven groups: 1) cancer survival all stages; 2) hepatoduodenal ligament invasion; 3) outcome in EHBDR and EHBDNR; 4) pT1b tumors; 5) pT2 tumors; 6) pT3/T4 tumors; and 7) incidental GB cancer. Radical cholecystectomy with EHBDR should be used as a standard operation for tumors involving the neck or the cystic duct of the GB (either macroscopically or microscopically). In all other cases, operative strategy should be individualized to the patient.

Effects of Surgical Methods and Tumor Location on Survival and Recurrence Patterns after Curative Resection in Patients with T2 Gallbladder Cancer

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Extended cholecystectomy is generally recommended for patients with T2 gallbladder cancer. However, few studies have assessed the extent of resection relative to T2 gallbladder tumor location. This study analyzed the effects of surgical methods and tumor location on survival outcomes and tumor recurrence in patients with T2 gallbladder cancer.

METHODS

Clinicopathological characteristics, extent of resection, survival rates, and recurrence patterns were retrospectively analyzed in 88 patients with pathologically confirmed T2 gallbladder cancer.

RESULTS

The 5-year disease-free survival rate was 65.0%. Multivariate analysis showed that lymph node metastasis was the only independent risk factor for poor 5-year disease-free survival rate. Survival outcomes were not associated with tumor location. Survival tended to be better in patients who underwent extended cholecystectomy than in those who underwent simple cholecystectomy. Recurrence rate was not affected by surgical method or tumor location. Systemic recurrence was more frequent than local recurrence without distant recurrence. Gallbladder bed recurrence and liver recurrence were relatively rare, occurring only in patients with liver side tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Extended cholecystectomy is the most appropriate treatment for T2 gallbladder cancer. However, simple cholecystectomy with regional lymph node dissection may be appropriate for patients with serosal side tumors.

Surgical treatment of incidental gallbladder cancer discovered during or following laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND

The optimal surgical management of patients with incidental gallbladder cancer (IGBC) and their long-term survival remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to examine the long-term prognosis of patients with IGBC diagnosed during or after LC.

METHODS

Between January 2002 and January 2012, a total of 7,582 consecutive patients underwent LC for presumed gallbladder benign disease in the Chinese PLA General Hospital, China. Among them, 69 patients (0.91%) were diagnosed to have IGBC. Their medical records, imaging data, surgery records, pathological findings, and survival data were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Median age was 61 years (range: 34-83). After a median follow-up period of 61 months, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of patients were 89.9, 78.3, and 76.8%, respectively. The 5-year survival rates of patients with T1a, T1b, T2, and T3 stages were 95.5, 93.8, 69.2, and 44.4%, respectively. The 5-year survival rates in simple LC (n = 45), converted to open extended cholecystectomy (n = 16), and radical second resection (n = 8) groups were 91.1, 37.5, and 75.0%, respectively. Local port-site tumor recurrence was identified in one patient. Prognostic factors including depth of invasion, lymph node status, vascular or neural invasion, tumor differentiation, extent of resection, bile spillage, and type of surgery were statistically significant (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Simple LC is appropriate for T1a patients with clear margin and unbroken gallbladder, whereas extended radical resection is recommended for patients with T1b or more advanced IGBC. An intact surgical specimen and the use of plastic retrieval bags are important to reduce the risk of port-site recurrences and disease relapse. Early diagnosis, meticulous perioperative assessment, and precise surgery are essential factors to obtain good results in IGBC treatment.

Is Laparoscopy Contraindicated for Gallbladder Cancer? A 10-Year Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic treatment for gallbladder cancer (GBC) has long been contraindicated, but few studies have demonstrated the oncologic outcomes of this treatment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate long-term survival after intended laparoscopic surgery for early-stage GBC based on our 10 years of experience.

STUDY DESIGN

Between May 2004 and April 2014, eighty-three patients suspected of having early-stage GBC with no evidence of liver invasion were enrolled in the prospective protocol for laparoscopic surgery. Data for 45 of these patients with pathologically proven GBC were analyzed to determine the safety and oncologic outcomes of a laparoscopic approach to GBC. Twenty-six patients whose postoperative follow-up exceeded 5 years were investigated to determine the 5-year actual survival outcomes.

RESULTS

Extended cholecystectomy, including laparoscopic lymphadenectomy, was performed in 32 patients and simple cholecystectomy in 13 patients. The T stages based on final pathologic results were Tis (n = 2), T1a (n = 10), T1b (n = 8), and T2 (n = 25). After a median follow-up of 60 months after surgery, recurrence was detected in 4 patients as distant metastases. There was no local recurrence around the gallbladder bed or lymphadenectomy. Disease-specific 5-year survival rate of the 45 patients was 94.2%. Disease-specific actual survival rate of 26 patients whose postoperative follow-up period exceeded 5 years was 92.3% at 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The favorable long-term oncologic results shown in this study confirm the oncologic safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, including laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in selected patients with GBC.

Tumor location is a strong predictor of tumor progression and survival in T2 gallbladder cancer: an international multicenter study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prognostic impact of tumor location in gallbladder cancer.

BACKGROUND

Depth of tumor is a strong predictor of survival after curative resection of gallbladder cancer. However, the gallbladder has a unique anatomical relationship with the liver, and the clinical significance of tumor location remains unclear.

METHODS

For 437 patients with gallbladder cancer who underwent resection at 4 international institutions, clinicopathologic characteristics and their association with survival were analyzed. Tumor location was defined as "hepatic side" or "peritoneal side," and the prognostic significance of tumor location was evaluated.

RESULTS

Among the 252 patients with T2 disease, patients with tumors on the hepatic side (T2h, n = 99) had higher rates of vascular invasion, neural invasion, and nodal metastasis than patients with tumors on the peritoneal side (T2p, n = 153) (51% vs 19%, 33% vs 8%, and 40% vs 17%, respectively; P < 0.01 for all). After a median follow-up of 58.9 months, 3-year and 5-year survival rates were 52.1% and 42.6%, respectively, for T2h tumors and 73.7% and 64.7%, respectively, for T2p tumors (P = 0.0006). No such differences were observed in T1 or T3 tumors. Multivariate analysis confirmed the independent association of hepatic-side location with survival in T2 tumors (hazard ratio, 2.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-4.2; P < 0.001). This subclassification of T2 tumors predicted recurrence in the liver (23% vs 3%; P = 0.003) and distant lymph nodes (16% vs 3%; P = 0.019) even after radical resection.

CONCLUSIONS

After curative resection of T2 gallbladder cancer, tumor location predicts the pattern of recurrence and survival.

Influence of high- and low-volume liver surgery in gallbladder carcinoma

AIM: To clarify whether the performance of liver resections (LR) for incidental gallbladder carcinoma (IGBC)’s depends more on the experience of the hospitals in liver surgery than on complying with the guidelines in Germany.

METHODS: For data analysis, we used the Surgical Association of Endoscopy and Ultrasound and Minimally Invasive Surgery Central Registry of “IGBC” of the German Society of Surgery (the German Registry). In 2010, we started a second form by requesting the frequency of LR at the various hospitals in Germany. The indication for LR was irrelevant. The aim was to determine the overall frequency of liver resections at the hospitals. We divided the hospitals according to their experience in liver surgery into high- (HV), mid- (MV), and low-volume (LV) LR hospitals.

RESULTS: This study includes 487 IGBC’s from 167 centers. There were 36 high-volume, 32 mid-volume, and 99 low-volume centers. In the high-volume centers, the mean (range) number of liver resections was 101 (40-300). In the mid-volume centers, the mean (range) number of liver resections was 26 (20-39). In the low-volume centers, the mean (range) number of liver resections was 6.5 (0-19) (P < 0.001). LV’s perform LR for T2-3 gallbladder carcinomas significantly less often than high-volume or mid-volume centers (χ² = 13.78, P = 0.001). In HV’s and MV’s, 61% of the patients with an indication for liver resection underwent LR, but in LV centers, only 41% with an indication for LR underwent LR (P < 0.001). In cases of T1b carcinomas, LR was performed significantly more often in HV’s (P = 0.009).

CONCLUSION: The central problem is that the performance of the required liver resection in IGBC in Germany depends on the hospital experience in liver surgery and not on the recommendations of the German guidelines.

Gallbladder cancer

Gallbladder cancer remains a relatively rare malignancy with a highly variable presentation. Gallbladder cancer is the most common biliary tract malignancy with the worst overall prognosis. With the advent of the laparoscope, in comparison with historical controls, this disease is now more commonly diagnosed incidentally and at an earlier stage. However, when symptoms of jaundice and pain are present, the prognosis remains dismal. From a surgical perspective, gallbladder cancer can be suspected preoperatively, identified intraoperatively, or discovered incidentally on final surgical pathology.

Bile duct carcinoma: diagnosis and treatment based on AJCC staging

Bile duct carcinoma includes gallbladder carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma derived from bile duct epithelial cells. According to tumor location, bile duct carcinoma can be divided into intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and the latter can be further divided into hilar cholangiocarcinoma and distal cholangiocarcinoma. Most patients have lost the opportunities for surgical resection because of difficult early diagnosis, rapid progression and complex anatomical site. The overall 5-year survival rate is less than 5%. In this paper, we describe the changes in surgical treatments and treatment concept for bile duct carcinoma in recent years.

The prognostic impact of positive lymph nodes in stages T1 to T3 incidental gallbladder carcinoma: results of the German Registry

BACKGROUND

In the literature, the 5 year survival rates for incidental gallbladder carcinoma (IGBC) show large variations in the different T-stages because the lymph node status often is not addressed. Most early-stage carcinomas are identified by laparoscopy as IGBC, and radical re-resection is needed. Staging is impossible without lymph node dissection, so comparison between various survival rates is impossible. This study aimed to determine the influence of lymph node status on the survival of patients with stages T1 to T3 IGBC.

METHODS

For data analysis, the German Registry was used.

RESULTS

In this study, 709 patients with IGBC were analyzed. The re-resected nodal-negative patients had a significant survival advantage over the re-resected nodal-positive patients. The 5 year survival rate for the patients with nodal-negative re-resected T1 carcinomas was 75%. The re-resected T2 and T3 nodal-negative patients had significantly better survival than the corresponding nodal-positive patients. The influence that the radicalness of the different liver resection techniques had on these results was excluded. 53 patients without radical resection had a known nodal-positive status. Nodal-positive patients with radical re-resection always show a better survival rate than nodal-positive patients without radical re-resection, stage for stage.

CONCLUSIONS

Nodal-positive status is a significant negative prognostic factor in T1 to T3 IGBC. Patients with radical re-resection show a better survival rate than those without it. Lymph node dissection is to be highly recommended up to stage T1b. In the case of T2 carcinomas, lymph node dissection of the hepatoduodenal ligament seems to be the minimum volume of lymph node dissection required, but more radical procedures could be beneficial for tumors infiltrating the serosa or beyond.

National trends in the management and survival of surgically managed gallbladder adenocarcinoma over 15 years: a population-based analysis

INTRODUCTION

National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend hepatic resection and lymphadenectomy (LND) for gallbladder adenocarcinoma (GBA). We sought to evaluate compliance with these recommendations and to assess trends in the management and survival of patients with GBA.

METHODS

Using Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare-linked data, we identified 2,955 patients with GBA who underwent cancer-directed surgery from 1991 to 2005. We assessed clinicopathologic data, trends in surgical management, and survival.

RESULTS

From 1991 to 2005, preoperative evaluation included CT (62%), MRI (6%), and PET (2%). Only 383 (13%) patients underwent radical resection/hepatectomy with a temporal increase over the study period (1991-1995, 12%; 1996-1999, 10%; 2000-2002, 12.0%; 2003-2005, 16%; P < 0.001). For patients undergoing radical resection/hepatectomy, LND ≥ 3 nodes was performed in 96 (3%) patients. Among patients who had LND, 47% had nodal metastasis. The overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival was 56%, 30%, and 21%. On multivariate analysis, radical resection/hepatectomy (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.71) and LND ≥ 3 nodes (HR = 0.56) were independently associated with increased survival. There was no significant improvement in survival over time (P = 0.60).

CONCLUSIONS

Compliance with NCCN guidelines for GBA remains poor. Survival of patients with surgically managed GBA has not improved over time.

Lymph node evaluation is associated with improved survival after surgery for early stage gallbladder cancer

BACKGROUND

Guidelines for the current National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommend radical cholecystectomy, including hepatic resection and portal lymph node (LN) dissection, for patients with early stage gallbladder (GB) cancer. We sought to determine the survival benefit conferred by adequate LN evaluation.

METHODS

We used the surveillance, epidemiology and end results (SEER) neoplasm registry to identify patients who had an operation for GB cancer between 1988 and 2004. Patients were classified by stage of disease, operative procedure performed (cholecystectomy alone or radical resection), number of LNs evaluated (0, 1, >1), and receipt of radiation (RT). We included patients with T1B, T2, and T3 neoplasms who were LN positive or negative. Patients with T4 neoplasms and those with metastatic disease were excluded. Multivariate analysis included adjustment for age, race, sex, neoplasm grade, stage, operation performed, receipt of RT, and neoplasm registry.

RESULTS

We identified 4,614 patients who underwent operative treatment for stage 1-2B GB (including T1B-T3 and LN positive or negative) cancer between 1988 and 2004. Of 4,614 patients, 9.6% (442) had radical resection, whereas 90.4% (4,172) had cholecystectomy alone. Among patients undergoing radical resection, 56% had LNs evaluated as compared with 28% of patients after cholecystectomy. For patients with T1B and T2 neoplasms who underwent radical resection, pathologic evaluation of at least 1 LN was associated with a significant improvement in median overall survival (OS) compared with those who had no LN evaluated (123 months vs 22 months; P < .0001). Radical resection with no LN evaluation provided similar OS compared with cholecystectomy alone (22 months vs 23 months; P = NS). For patients with T3 neoplasms, radical resection, including pathologic evaluation of at least 1 LN, was also associated with improved OS compared with radical resection with no LN evaluation (12 months vs 7 months; P = .0014). Again, individuals who had radical resection without LN evaluation had similar OS compared with those who had cholecystectomy alone (7 months vs 6 months; P = NS). Individuals who had radical resection with LN evaluation were more likely to receive RT than those who had radical resection without LN evaluation (33.1% vs 19.1%; P = .002). In multivariate analysis (including adjustment for RT), however, LN evaluation was still associated with a decrease in mortality compared with no LN evaluated (HR = 0.611; 95% CI = 0.484, 0.770). The pathologic evaluation of additional LN (>1) did not provide any additional benefit compared with the evaluation of a single node (HR = 0.795; 95% CI = 0.571, 1.107). Radical resection alone (without LN evaluation) did not provide any benefit over cholecystectomy alone (HR = 1.098; 95% CI = 0.971, 1.241).

CONCLUSION

LN evaluation is a critical component of radical resection for GB cancer. In the absence of LN evaluation, radical resection provides no benefit over cholecystectomy alone.

[Gallbladder cancer in a regional hospital]

OBJECTIVES

To assess the management of gallbladder cancer (GBC) in our region.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data on 372 patients who underwent cholecystectomy were identified from our database (January 2003 to February 2008) and 6 patients were found to have GBC.

RESULTS

Four patients had incidental carcinoma, one case was preoperatively suspected, and one patient presented with jaundice and locally advanced neoplasia. The incidence was 2 per 100,000 inhabitants per year; incidental carcinoma in 1.1% of cholecystecomies. The ultrasonography showed multilithiasis in 2 patients, sludge and neoplasia in 1, gallstones more than 3cm in 2, and tumor mass only in 1 case. T stage: 1 case of T0 (in situ), 1 of T1, 2 of T2 and one T4. Incidental carcinomas were reoperated on when a T2 was established: 2 underwent lymphadenectomy and cystic stump resection, 1 segmentectomy IVb-V and lymphadenectomy. In the preoperative suspected neoplasia a cholecystectomy, lymphadenectomy, and partial hepatic gallbladder bed resection was initially performed.

CONCLUSIONS

GBC has a low incidence but it will be found in 1% of cholecystectomies. There is no adjuvant treatment and T-based surgical treatment is the is the only opportunity to reach cure in those patients. A national GBC database would be helpful in the publication of national guidelines for this disease.

A critical analysis of the surgical management of early-stage gallbladder cancer in the United States

BACKGROUND

Radical resection is recommended for selected patients with gallbladder (GB) cancer. We sought to determine whether radical resection improves survival for patients with early-stage cancer and to evaluate surgeon compliance with current treatment recommendations.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with stage 0, I, or II GB cancer who underwent surgical resection were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) tumor registry from 1988 through 2004. Patients were classified by surgical procedure performed (simple vs. radical resection) and adjuvant treatment given (radiation therapy [RT] vs. no RT). Unadjusted and adjusted overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were compared.

RESULTS

Of the 4,631 patients who underwent surgery for early-stage GB cancer from 1988 through 2004, 4,188 (90.4%) underwent cholecystectomy alone and 443 (9.6%) underwent radical surgery including hepatic resection. The proportion of patients having radical surgery for T1b, T2, and T3 cancers was 4.5%, 5.6%, and 16.3%, respectively. For patients with T1b/T2 cancer, radical resection was associated with significant improvement in adjusted CSS (p = 0.01) and OS (p = 0.03). For patients with T3 cancers, we noted no improvement in CSS or OS. Survival for patients with node-positive disease (stage 2b) was universally poor and not improved by radical resection. For all patients who underwent radical resection, node negativity, female sex, age <70, low grade, and RT predicted improved CSS and OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a significant survival advantage for patients with T1b/T2 GB cancer who undergo radical resection, this treatment is significantly underutilized. Ensuring delivery of recommended surgical treatment is vital to improving outcomes for patients with this disease.

Consideration of anatomical structures relevant to the surgical strategy for managing gallbladder carcinoma

AIMS

Gallbladder carcinoma usually presents late with advanced disease. It develops in an anatomically complex area. Consideration is given to resection of relevant local structures with respect to outcome.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature review was performed, searching Medline for articles published since 2000, using the MeSH heading of 'gallbladder cancer' and 'surgery'. Abstracts were reviewed and articles retrieved if the main focus of the article centred on the surgical management of gallbladder carcinoma.

OBSERVATIONS

Hepatic resection is advocated and tailored to pathological T stage. Lymph node dissection and bile duct resection, as well as en bloc resection of other viscera, remain areas of controversy.

CONCLUSIONS

Eastern and Western practice standards of care differ, but hepatic resection with some lymph node dissection is present in both approaches. Philosophy regarding aggression with respect to en bloc resection of adjacent organs and actual extent of lymphatic resection remains disparate.

Gallbladder cancer: a morphological and molecular update

Gallbladder cancer (GBC) shows a marked geographical variation in its incidence, with the highest figures being seen in India and Chile and relatively low levels in many Western countries. Risk factors for its development include the presence of gallstones, infection and the presence of an anomalous pancreatobiliary ductal junction. It can arise from either a pathway involving metaplasia or dysplasia or one in which there is a pre-existing adenoma. The former is the more common and, because it is often not associated with a macroscopically recognizable lesion, leads to the recommendation that all gallbladders need to be examined microscopically. Accurate staging of invasive cancers is essential to determine prognosis and treatment, and this requires extensive tumour sampling. A number of genetic alterations have been identified in the preinvasive and invasive stages of GBC and they support the morphological evidence of there being two pathways by which tumours develop. Some of these genetic changes are associated with particular risk factors. For example, cases with anomalous pancreatobiliary ductal junction show a higher frequency of K-ras mutations. Some changes are associated with differences in prognosis. For example, cancers without expression of p21 but with expression for p27 have a better prognosis, whereas those that express c-erb-B2 have a worse one. Work has also been done on identifying clinical, imaging and other factors that indicate that patients have a higher risk of having GBC. This is particularly important in high-incidence areas in which GBC is a significant public health problem.

A review of the surgical strategies for the management of gallbladder carcinoma based on T stage and growth type of the tumour

AIMS

Surgery for gallbladder carcinoma is a technically challenging exercise. The extent of resection varies based on a number of factors, and controversy exists regarding what constitutes an acceptable resection. A review of current recommendations and practice was undertaken.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature review was performed, searching Medline for articles published since 2000, using the MeSH heading of 'gallbladder cancer' and 'surgery'. Abstracts were reviewed and articles retrieved if the main focus of the article centred on the surgical management of gallbladder carcinoma.

OBSERVATIONS

The extent of hepatic resection and lymph node dissection required varies in particular with T stage. Growth pattern and anatomical location of the tumour within the gallbladder also influence surgical management.

CONCLUSIONS

Discrepancy exists between the Eastern and Western literature in terms of what constitutes an acceptable limit of resection, and these issues are discussed.

Prognostic factors for gallbladder cancer in Japan

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate prognostic predictors for patients with gallbladder cancer (GBC) in a Japanese nationwide data base.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

GBC is the most common cancer of the biliary tract in Japan. Differences in the survival rates between Japan and other countries have been noted.

METHODS

The authors analyzed 4424 patients with GBC in Japan between 1988 and 1997. Staging was determined in accordance with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage.

RESULTS

Survival is related closely to the surgical stage. Five-year survival rates for stage I, II, III, IVA, and IVB (5th edition) were 83%, 70%, 45%, 23%, and 9%, respectively. These differences were significant (P < 0.0001). The survival rate for patients aged <60 years was significantly better (P < 0.05). The survival rate for patients aged >69 years was significantly worse (P < 0.01). The cholecystectomy plus combined resection of bile duct and/or liver bed resection had an effect on prolonging the survival in stage II or III disease, but extended resection did not. The patients with anomalous pancreaticobiliary ductal junction had a survival advantage over those with cholelithiasis by univariate analysis. However, multivariate analyses indicated that only age, sex, stage, operative procedures were independent prognostic factors. Stage was the strongest covariate; patients diagnosed with stage II, III, IVA, or IVB disease were 2.2, 4.2, 8.1, and 13.6 times, respectively, were more likely to die.

CONCLUSIONS

Staging is the strongest prognostic factor for GBC, but patient outcomes were also affected by age, sex, and operative procedures. The data do not support any advantage for extended resection. Neither gallstones nor anomalous pancreaticobiliary ductal junction influenced the GBC patient outcome.