The Hill antireflux repair at 5 institutions over 25 years

Impedance planimetry (EndoFLIPTM) and surgical outcomes after Hill compared to Toupet fundoplication

INTRODUCTION

Endoluminal functional lumen imaging probe (EndoFLIP) provides a real-time assessment of gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) compliance during fundoplication. Given the limited data on EndoFLIP measurements during the Hill procedure, we investigated the impact of the Hill procedure on GEJ compliance compared to Toupet fundoplication.

METHODS

Patients who underwent robotic Hill or Toupet fundoplication with intraoperative EndoFLIP between 2017 and 2022 were included. EndoFLIP measurements of the GEJ included cross sectional surface area (CSA), intra-balloon pressure, high pressure zone length (HPZ), distensibility index (DI), and compliance. Subjective reflux symptoms, gastroesophageal reflux disease-health related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) score, and dysphagia score were assessed pre-operatively as well as at short- and longer-term follow-up.

RESULTS

One-hundred and fifty-four patients (71.9%) had a Toupet fundoplication while sixty (28%) patients underwent the Hill procedure. The CSA [27.7 ± 10.9 mm2 vs 42.2 ± 17.8 mm2, p < 0.0001], pressure [29.5 ± 6.2 mmHg vs 33.9 ± 8.5 mmHg, p = 0.0009], DI [0.9 ± 0.4 mm2/mmHg vs 1.3 ± 0.6 mm2/mmHg, p = 0.001], and compliance [25.9 ± 12.8 mm3/mmHg vs 35.4 ± 13.4 mm3/mmHg, p = 0.01] were lower after the Hill procedure compared to Toupet. However, there was no difference in post-fundoplication HPZ between procedures [Hill: 2.9 ± 0.4 cm, Toupet: 3.1 ± 0.6 cm, p = 0.15]. Follow-up showed no significant differences in GERD-HRQL scores, overall dysphagia scores or atypical symptoms between groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The Hill procedure is as effective to the Toupet fundoplication in surgically treating gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) despite the lower CSA, DI, and compliance after the Hill procedure. Both procedures led to DI < 2 mm2/mmHg with no significant differences in dysphagia reporting (12-24) months after the procedure. Further studies to elucidate a cutoff value for DI for postoperative dysphagia development are still warranted.

Gastroesophageal reflux after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: Is it just related to technical details?

Although it is uncommon, gastroesophageal reflux disease can present after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and it is usually related to technical errors. Hiatal hernia, a narrow calibrated gastrojejunostomy and a long gastric pouch are all factors associated with the development of pathologic gastroesophageal reflux. Techniques are available to treat this condition, such as fundoplications with the gastric remnant, gastropexy to the arcuate ligament, teres ligament repair, or sphincter augmentation with the LINX device. Despite the growing number of reports of gastroesophageal reflux after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, it should be still considered the best surgical option for patients with obesity and a large hiatal hernia or complications secondary to gastroesophageal reflux disease.

The Nissen-Hill Hybrid Repair: Experience with the First 500

INTRODUCTION

A new repair for gastroesophageal reflux and hiatal hernia, the Nissen-Hill hybrid repair (HYB), was developed to combine the relative strengths of its component repairs with the aim of improved durability. In several small series' it has been shown to be safe, effective and durable for paraesophageal hernia (PEH) , Barrett's esophagus (BE) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). This study represents our experience with the first 500 consecutive repairs for all indications .

METHODS

Retrospective study of prospectively collected data for the first 500 consecutive HYB repairs from March 2006 to December 2016 including all indications for surgery. Three quality of life metrics, manometry, radiographic imaging, and pH testing were administered before and at defined intervals after repair.

RESULTS

500 patients with median follow up of 6.1 years. Indications for surgery were GERD in 231 (46.2%), PEH in 202 (40.4%), and re-operative repair in 67 (13.4%). The mean age was 59, with BMI of 30 and 63% female. A minimally invasive approach was used in 492 (98%). Thirty-day operative mortality was 1 (0.2%), with a 4% major complication rate and a median length of stay of 2 days. Preoperative to postoperative pH testing was available for 390 patients at a median follow-up of 7.3 months, with median DeMeester score improving from 45.9 to 2.7. At long-term follow-up (229 responses) all median quality of life scores improved: QOLRAD 4 to 6.9, GERD-HRQL 22 to 3 and Swallowing 37.5 to 45 and proton pump inhibitor use dropped from 460 (92%) to 50 (10%) Fourteen (2.8%) underwent re-operation for failure.

CONCLUSION

The combined Nissen-Hill hybrid repair is safe and effective in achieving excellent symptomatic and objective outcomes and low recurrence rates beyond 5 years.

The role of laparoscopic Nissen, Hill, and Nissen-Hill hybrid repairs for uncomplicated gastroesophageal reflux disease

There are several elements that constitute the lower esophageal barrier against reflux. What characterizes the abnormality seen in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is the loss of an effective barrier combined with refluxed gastric contents. Several techniques including those described by Nissen, Toupet, and Hill have become options for reconstructing the physiologic barrier. In this paper, we describe our technique of performing laparoscopic Nissen, Hill, and a combined Nissen-Hill hybrid repair for the management of uncomplicated GERD. In a randomized study comparing 46 laparoscopic Nissen to 56 laparoscopic Hill repairs, subjective and objective short term and long term (13 months) outcomes including use of antisecretory agents were equivalent. The number of failures requiring reoperation were also the same but the difference in failure types prompted us to examine the two techniques and fuse them into one to maximize the integrity of the lower esophageal barrier. A comparative study of the Nissen, Hill, and hybrid repairs with 15-month follow-up showed similar subjective and objective outcomes and specifically no increase in dysphagia for the combined repair. There was also a trend towards less recurrence the hybrid group. More recently, we studied our Nissen repairs and compared them to hybrid repairs over a 22-month median follow-up period. Quality of life outcomes were superior for the hybrid group in all domains. For the subset of patients with a mean follow-up of 60 months the anatomic recurrence rate was 5% in the hybrid group compared to 45% in the Nissen group. These data strongly suggest that the anchoring of gastroesophageal junction with Hill sutures reduces the axial stresses on the Nissen wrap to maintain its integrity. The laparoscopic Nissen, and laparoscopic Hill procedures have been proven to have excellent results for the treatment of GERD. Larger studies are underway to demonstrate the long-term durability of the hybrid Nissen-Hill procedure in the management of GERD.

Sleeve Gastrectomy Combined with the Simplified Hill Repair in the Treatment of Morbid Obesity and Gastro-esophageal Reflux Disease: Preliminary Results in 14 Patients

BACKGROUND

Our aim is to report our initial experience with a novel technique which addresses morbid obesity and gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) simultaneously by combination of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and simplified laparoscopic Hill repair (sLHR).

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of LSG+sLHR patients >5 months postoperatively includes demographics, GERD status, proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) use, body mass index (BMI), excess BMI loss (EBMIL), complications and GERD-Health Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) questionnaire. LSG+sLHR surgical technique: posterior cruroplasty,  standard LSG, fixation of the esophagogastric junction to the median arcuate ligament.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients underwent LSG+sLHR [12 women and 2 men, mean (range) age 47 years (27-57), BMI 41 kg/m² (35-65)]. Five patients had previous gastric banding (GB). All had symptomatic GERD confirmed by gastroscopy and/or upper-gastrointestinal contrast study, two with chronic cough, 10 took PPI daily. Twelve had hiatus hernia and two patulous cardia at surgical exploration. Associated interventions were three GB removals and one cholecystectomy. Postoperative complication was one surgical site infection. Follow-up of all patients at median 12.5 months (5-17) is as follows: symptomatic GERD 3/14 patients, chronic cough 0/14, daily PPI use in 1/14, mean EBMIL 68% (17-120), satisfaction 93%, mean GERD-HRQL score 3,28/50 (0-15), with 4 patients 0/50, occasional bloatedness in 2 patients and dysphagia not reported.

CONCLUSION

The novel technique which combines LSG with sLHR is feasible, safe and can be associated with GB removal. Preliminary results showed patient satisfaction, high remission rate of preexisting GERD, decrease in PPI use and unimpaired weight loss. Further evaluation is necessary in a controlled and staged manner to establish the technique's real effectiveness.

A randomized multiinstitution comparison of the laparoscopic Nissen and Hill repairs

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic Hill repair (LHR) and laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) are established surgical antireflux procedures but have never been compared in a prospective trial. This trial was designed to compare the effectiveness of LHR against the gold-standard LNF.

METHODS

Patients with uncomplicated gastroesophageal reflux from two esophageal centers were randomly assigned and blinded from 2003 to 2007. Preoperative and postoperative evaluation included two quality of life metrics--Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia, and Dysphagia--as well as endoscopy, video esophogram, manometry, and pH testing.

RESULTS

Of 121 patients who consented to the trial, 102 underwent surgery; 46 LNF and 56 LHR were performed, with a mean follow-up of 12 months. Postoperatively, the DeMeester score normalized for both repairs, with no difference between them (LNF 6.8, LHR 11.1, p=0.26). Postoperative medication use was 4%, and the groups were equivalent. Lower esophageal sphincter pressure increased significantly for LNF (14.93 to 24.10, p=0.001) but not for LHR (19.91 to 20.25, p=0.87). Quality of life scores improved significantly for both repairs (LNF 3.77 to 6.65; LHR 3.84 to 6.54, p<0.001), and postoperative results were equivalent (p=0.99). Dysphagia scores preoperative/postoperative were LNF 33.88 to 38.33 and LHR 35.44 to 38.72, and were equivalent postoperatively (p=0.94). Two LNF and two LHR required reoperation for failed repair.

CONCLUSIONS

The LHR and the LNF both yield excellent and equivalent results for uncomplicated gastroesophageal reflux at 12 months. Their mechanisms of action may be different.