1
|
Adam MA, Zhou H, Byrd J, Greenberg AL, Kelly YM, Hall L, Jones HL, Pingpank JF, Lipton ZC, Bartlett DL, Choudry HM. Predicting Severe Complications from Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: A Data-Driven, Machine Learning Approach to Augment Clinical Judgment. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:5433-5442. [PMID: 37266808 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13657-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CRS-HIPEC provides oncologic benefit in well-selected patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis; however, it is a morbid procedure. Decision tools for preoperative patient selection are limited. We developed a risk score to predict severity of 90 day complications for cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Adults who underwent CRS-HIPEC at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (March 2001-April 2020) were analyzed as part of this study. Primary endpoint was severe complications within 90 days following CRS-HIPEC, defined using Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) scores as a dichotomous (determined using restricted cubic splines) and continuous variable. Data were divided into training and test sets. Several machine learning and traditional algorithms were considered. RESULTS For the 1959 CRS-HIPEC procedures included, CCI ranged from 0 to 100 (median 32.0). Adjusted restricted cubic splines model defined severe complications as CCI > 61. A minimum of 20 variables achieved optimal performance of any of the models. Linear regression achieved the highest area under the receiving operator characteristic curve (AUC, 0.74) and outperformed the NSQIP Surgical Risk calculator (AUC 0.80 vs. 0.66). Factors most positively associated with severe complications included peritoneal carcinomatosis index score, symptomatic status, and undergoing pancreatectomy, while American Society of Anesthesiologists 2 class, appendiceal diagnosis, and preoperative albumin were most negatively associated with severe complications. CONCLUSIONS This study refines our ability to predict severe complications within 90 days of discharge from a hospitalization in which CRS-HIPEC was performed. This advancement is timely and relevant given the growing interest in this procedure and may have implications for patient selection, patient and referring provider comfort, and survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Helen Zhou
- Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Lauren Hall
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Heather L Jones
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Somashekhar SP, Ramya Y, Ashwin KR, Fernandes AM, Ahuja V, Namachivayam AK, Kumar CR. Cytoreductive Surgery with HIPEC as Primary Treatment for Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma: Upfront or Interval-ISPSM Collaborative Study. Indian J Surg Oncol 2023; 14:226-232. [PMID: 37359935 PMCID: PMC10284758 DOI: 10.1007/s13193-023-01747-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC has shown promising results in the interval setting of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Its role in upfront setting has not yet been established. All eligible patients underwent CRS-HIPEC as per institution protocol. Relevant data was collected prospectively in institutional HIPEC registry and analyzed retrospectively for the study period from February 2014 to February 2020. Out of 190 patients, 80 underwent CRS-HIPEC in upfront setting and 110 in interval setting. The median age was 54 ± 7.45 years, upfront group had higher PCI (14.1 ± 8.75 vs. 9.6 ± 5.2. 2), and required longer duration of surgery (10.6 ± 1.73 vs. 8.4 ± 1.71 h) had more blood loss (1025 ± 668.76 vs. 680 ± 302.23 ml). The upfront group required more diaphragmatic resections, bowel resections, and multivisceral resections. The overall G3-G4 morbidity was comparable (25.4% vs. 27.3%), upfront group had more surgical morbidity (20% vs. 9.1%) whereas interval group had more medical morbidity, i.e., electrolyte imbalance and hematological. After a median follow-up of 43 months, median DFS was 33 months in the upfront vs. 30 months in the interval group, p = 0.75, median OS was 46 months interval group and was not yet achieved in upfront group.(p = 0.13). Four-year OS was 85% vs. 60%. In patients of advanced EOC upfront CRS HIPEC showed promising outcomes and trend towards better survival with similar morbidity and mortality. The upfront group had more surgical morbidity whereas interval group had more medical morbidity. Multiinstitutional randomized studies are needed to define patient selection and study morbidity patterns and compare the outcomes between CRS-HIPEC in the upfront and interval setting for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. P. Somashekhar
- Department of Surgical & Gynecological Oncology, Aster International Institute of Oncology, Aster Hospital, Bangalore, India
| | - Y. Ramya
- Apollo BGS Hospital, Mysore, India
| | - K. R. Ashwin
- Department of Surgical & Gynecological Oncology, Aster International Institute of Oncology, Aster Hospital, Bangalore, India
| | - Aaron Marian Fernandes
- Department of Surgical & Gynecological Oncology, Aster International Institute of Oncology, Aster Hospital, Bangalore, India
| | - Vijay Ahuja
- Department of Surgical & Gynecological Oncology, Aster International Institute of Oncology, Aster Hospital, Bangalore, India
| | | | - C. Rohit Kumar
- Department of Surgical & Gynecological Oncology, Aster International Institute of Oncology, Aster Hospital, Bangalore, India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Paquette B, Kalbacher E, Mercier F, Lakkis Z, Doussot A, Turco C, Caputo E, Pili-Floury S, Royer B, Mansi L, Delroeux D, Demarchi M, Pivot X, Chauffert B, Clement E, Heyd B. Cytoreductive Surgery and Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Advanced Serous Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A 14-Year French Retrospective Single-Center Study of 124 Patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:3322-3334. [PMID: 34994906 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-11211-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Ovarian cancer (OC) is the most lethal gynecological cancer. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy appears to increase survival, and normothermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC) could improve overall survival (OS). Furthermore, intraperitoneal epinephrine could decrease the toxicity of chemotherapy by decreasing the systemic absorption of chemotherapy. The goal of this study was to assess the effects of CRS and IPC with intraperitoneal epinephrine, as first-line therapy, on the survival of patients with serous epithelial OC (EOC) with peritoneal metastases. METHODS A prospective monocentric database was retrospectively searched for all patients with advanced serous EOC treated by interval or consolidative CRS plus IPC with intraperitoneal epinephrine after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. OS and disease-free survival (DFS), postoperative complications, and prognostic factors were analyzed. RESULTS From January 2003 to December 2017, 124 patients with serous EOC were treated with interval (n = 58) or consolidative (n = 66) complete CRS plus IPC with intraperitoneal epinephrine. The median follow-up was 77.8 months, the median OS was 60.8 months, and the median DFS was 21.2 months. In our multivariate analysis, a higher Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) and positive lymph node status resulted in worse OS, while higher World Health Organization score, higher PCI score, and positive lymph node status were risk factors for worse DFS. Grade 3 or higher surgical morbidity occurred in 27.42% of cases; only 3.2% had grade 3 renal toxicity and mortality was 0.8%. CONCLUSION CRS and IPC with intraperitoneal epinephrine in stage III EOC offer good OS and DFS with acceptable morbidity and mortality rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brice Paquette
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital, Besançon, France.
| | - Elsa Kalbacher
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital, Besançon, France
| | | | - Zaher Lakkis
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital, Besançon, France
| | | | - Célia Turco
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital, Besançon, France
| | - Edda Caputo
- Dracénie Hospital Center, Draguignan, France
| | | | - Bernard Royer
- Medical Biology Laboratory, University Hospital, Besançon, France
| | - Laura Mansi
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital, Besançon, France
| | | | - Martin Demarchi
- Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, Strasbourg, France
| | - Xavier Pivot
- Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, Strasbourg, France
| | - Bruno Chauffert
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital, Amiens Cedex 1, France
| | - Elise Clement
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital, Besançon, France
| | - Bruno Heyd
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital, Besançon, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ha HI, Lim MC. How do we perform hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in ovarian cancer? -a narrative review. Gland Surg 2021; 10:1235-1243. [PMID: 33842270 DOI: 10.21037/gs-20-425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Ovarian malignancy is a leading cause of death caused by gynecologic cancer worldwide because it is mainly found in the advanced stage and recurs in most patients even after cytoreductive surgery and intravenous (IV) chemotherapy. Prevention of recurrence of primary disease and treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer are still remained as major interest and lots of researchers investigate novel treatment to find optimal method. Even though intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy turns out to increase the overall survival, it is not widely used because of adverse event. As an alternative treatment for IP chemotherapy, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is emerging a new way. Thanks to much research and use in other cancer species, such as the colorectal cancer cytoreductive surgery followed by HIPEC is becoming a promising treatment. However, randomized controlled trials and unbiased data in ovarian cancer patients are still needed for the establishment of therapy. Moreover, among the current situation in which treatments such as bevacizumab or PARP inhibitor have been found to be effective and have been widely used, it may be necessary to establish the role in the combination of HIPEC. This article is a comprehensive review of the HIPEC in ovarian cancer to introduce techniques, treatment results, and clinical trials of HIPEC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyeong In Ha
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Myong Cheol Lim
- Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yasukawa M, Matsuo K, Matsuzaki S, Dainty LA, Sugarbaker PH. Management of recurrent granulosa cell tumor of the ovary: Contemporary literature review and a proposal of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy as novel therapeutic option. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2020; 47:44-51. [PMID: 33103312 DOI: 10.1111/jog.14494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2020] [Revised: 08/25/2020] [Accepted: 09/05/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Granulosa cell tumors of the ovary (GCT) are the most common type of sex cord stromal tumors. Although most of patients are diagnosed at early stage and has favorable 5-year overall survival rate, 16-23% of GCT ultimately develop recurrent disease. Recurrences are characterized by disseminated peritoneal metastasis. The treatment options include systemic chemotherapy, secondary CRS or palliative localized radiation therapy have not yet standardized due to the rarity of disease. Aggressive CRS followed up by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been shown to provide benefit in other peritoneal disease but limited data available for recurrent GCT. We have a case of recurrent Adult-type GCT (AGCT) who was treated with CRS followed by HIPEC with mitomycin C and doxorubicin. The patient has no evidence of recurrence for approximately 11 years. An electronic search of the PubMed database with the following search terms: GCT, HIPEC showed that there were total 21 patients with recurrent GCT treated in seven different studies and 13 of 21 (61.9%) patients had no evidence of disease during follow-up ranging from 6 to 100 months. Three patients (14.2%) died of the disease. Six studies used cisplatin for HIPEC. At least 76.2% (16 of 21, data not available for five patients) had complete cytoreduction with total 16 cases of perioperative complications but no perioperative mortality was observed. Although further investigation is needed, we propose that CRS and HIPEC can be an effective therapeutic option for recurrent GCT at experienced institutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maya Yasukawa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Koji Matsuo
- Division of Gynecology Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.,Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Shinya Matsuzaki
- Division of Gynecology Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Louis A Dainty
- Regional Director of Gynecologic Oncology at Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chief of Gynecologic Oncology Department at MedStar Washington Cancer, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Paul H Sugarbaker
- Chief of Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Program and Director of the Center for Gastrointestinal Malignancies, MedStar Washington Cancer Institute, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bouchard-Fortier G, Cusimano MC, Fazelzad R, Sajewycz K, Lu L, Espin-Garcia O, May T, Bouchard-Fortier A, Ferguson SE. Oncologic outcomes and morbidity following heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy at cytoreductive surgery for primary epithelial ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 158:218-228. [PMID: 32387131 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.03.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2020] [Accepted: 03/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has not been universally adopted at the time of interval cytoreductive surgery for primary epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) despite evidence of a 12-month overall survival (OS) benefit in a recent landmark randomized trial. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess oncologic outcomes and perioperative morbidity following HIPEC among primary EOC patients. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, from inception to August 2019, for observational and randomized studies of primary EOC patients undergoing HIPEC. We assessed risk of bias using the Institute of Health Economics Quality Appraisal Checklist for single-arm cohort studies, Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for comparative cohort studies, and Cochrane Collaboration's Tool for randomized trials. We qualitatively summarized survival outcomes and calculated the pooled proportion of 30-day grade III-IV morbidity and postoperative death. RESULTS We identified 35 articles including 2252 primary EOC patients; one study was a randomized trial, and only six studies included a comparator group of surgery alone. The timing, temperature, and chemotherapeutic agents used for HIPEC differed across studies. Reported OS was highly variable (3-year OS range: 46-77%); three comparative cohort studies and the sole randomized trial reported statistically significant survival benefits for HIPEC over surgery alone, while two comparative cohort studies did not. The pooled proportions for grade III-IV morbidity and postoperative death at 30 days were 34% (95% CI 20-52) and 0% (95% CI 0-5) respectively. CONCLUSION One randomized trial suggests that HIPEC at time of interval cytoreductive surgery should be considered in patients with primary EOC. However, there is significant heterogeneity in literature with respect to an appropriate HIPEC regimen, short- and long-term outcomes. High-quality prospective randomized trials are urgently needed to clarify the role of HIPEC in the first-line treatment of primary EOC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Genevieve Bouchard-Fortier
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Maria C Cusimano
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Rouhi Fazelzad
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network Library and Information Services, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Katrina Sajewycz
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lin Lu
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Osvaldo Espin-Garcia
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Taymaa May
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Sarah E Ferguson
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ba M, Long H, Zhang X, Yan Z, Wang S, Wu Y, Gong Y, Cui S. Ascites do not affect the rate of complete cytoreductive surgery and prognosis in patients with primary ovarian cancer with ascites treated with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Oncol Lett 2019; 18:2025-2033. [PMID: 31423274 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2019.10493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2016] [Accepted: 08/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) is the current standard therapy procedure for patients with advanced ovarian cancer (OC), but numerous patients with OC are complicated with ascites. The aim of the present study was to assess whether massive ascites affect the rate of complete CRS and prognosis for patients with primary OC treated with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Between December 2006 and December 2015, 1,293 patients with primary OC from the Intracelom Hyperthermic Perfusion Therapy Center of the Cancer Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University prospective database were treated with CRS combined with HIPEC. A total of 1,225 patients were without malignant ascites or small amounts of ascites and 68 had massive malignant ascites. The rate of complete CRS, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and resolution of ascites for patients with massive ascites were analyzed between patients without/small ascites, and with massive ascites. Complete CRS was successful in 86.8% (1,063/1,225) of patients without/small ascites, and 85.3% (58/68) of patients with massive ascites. No statistical differences were identified in complete CRS success between patients with ascites and patients without/small ascites (P=0.080). For patients with massive ascites, all symptoms exhibited regression; the total objective remission rate was 100% (68/68), even for patients with incomplete CRS (10/68) (P=0.100). The mean OS was 58 months and the mean DFS was 26 months in patients without/small ascite, vs. 57 months and 28 months in patients with massive ascites. No significant differences were noted in median DFS and median OS between patients with ascites, and patients without/small ascites (All P>0.05). In conclusion, the results of the present study suggest that ascites does not affect the rate of complete CRS and the prognosis of patients with massive ascites following HIPEC. CRS is suitable for the majority of patients with primary OC and massive ascites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mingchen Ba
- Intracelom Hyperthermic Perfusion Therapy Center, Cancer Hospital and Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510095, P.R. China
| | - Hui Long
- Guangzhou Dermatology Institute, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510095, P.R. China
| | - Xiangliang Zhang
- Intracelom Hyperthermic Perfusion Therapy Center, Cancer Hospital and Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510095, P.R. China
| | - Zhaofei Yan
- Intracelom Hyperthermic Perfusion Therapy Center, Cancer Hospital and Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510095, P.R. China
| | - Shuai Wang
- Intracelom Hyperthermic Perfusion Therapy Center, Cancer Hospital and Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510095, P.R. China
| | - Yinbing Wu
- Intracelom Hyperthermic Perfusion Therapy Center, Cancer Hospital and Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510095, P.R. China
| | - Yuanfeng Gong
- Intracelom Hyperthermic Perfusion Therapy Center, Cancer Hospital and Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510095, P.R. China
| | - Shuzhong Cui
- Guangzhou Baorui Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Guangzhou, Guangdong 510540, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Han X, An L, Yan D, Hiroshi M, Ding W, Zhang M, Xu G, Sun Y, Yuan G, Wang M, Zhao N, Sun J, Zhu X, Du P. Combined antitumor effects of P-5m octapeptide and 5-fluorouracil on a murine model of H22 hepatoma ascites. Exp Ther Med 2018; 16:1586-1592. [PMID: 30186375 PMCID: PMC6122418 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2018.6422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2016] [Accepted: 02/10/2017] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
The present study has demonstrated that P-5m octapeptide (P-5m) has therapeutic potential in metastatic human hepatocarcinoma, possibly through the modulation of matrix metalloproteinase-2 expression. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the antitumor effect of P-5m combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-Fu) on the treatment of hepatoma 22 (H22) hepatocarcinoma malignant ascites in a mouse model. The inhibitory effect on the growth of mouse ascites tumors was monitored by measuring body weight gain, survival time, ascites volume, numbers of tumor cells, DNA synthesis and peritoneal capillary permeability analysis. The present data revealed a significant reduction in ascites volume and cell count in mice that were treated with P-5m plus 5-Fu. Furthermore, the median survival time in mice in the combination group was prolonged compared with the disease control group. Moreover, a significant reduction in the total H22 ascites cell count in mice from the combination group was observed when compared with the disease control group. P-5m plus 5-Fu was able to induce the cell cycle arrest and inhibit the peritoneal capillary permeability of the mice. To conclude, the present study indicated that P-5m may have therapeutic potential in ascites caused by hepatocellular carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao Han
- Department of Microbial and Biochemical Pharmacy, College of Pharmaceutical Science, Beihua University, Changchun, Jilin 132013, P.R. China
| | - Liping An
- Department of Microbial and Biochemical Pharmacy, College of Pharmaceutical Science, Beihua University, Changchun, Jilin 132013, P.R. China
| | - Dongmei Yan
- Department of Immunology, Norman Bethune College of Medicine, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130021, P.R. China
| | - Matsuura Hiroshi
- Department of Cardiovascular and Respiratory Medicine, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Shiga 5202192, Japan
| | - Weiguang Ding
- Department of Cardiovascular and Respiratory Medicine, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Shiga 5202192, Japan
| | - Mengchuan Zhang
- Department of Microbial and Biochemical Pharmacy, College of Pharmaceutical Science, Beihua University, Changchun, Jilin 132013, P.R. China
| | - Guangyu Xu
- Department of Microbial and Biochemical Pharmacy, College of Pharmaceutical Science, Beihua University, Changchun, Jilin 132013, P.R. China
| | - Ying Sun
- Department of Microbial and Biochemical Pharmacy, College of Pharmaceutical Science, Beihua University, Changchun, Jilin 132013, P.R. China
| | - Guangxin Yuan
- Department of Microbial and Biochemical Pharmacy, College of Pharmaceutical Science, Beihua University, Changchun, Jilin 132013, P.R. China
| | - Manli Wang
- Department of Microbial and Biochemical Pharmacy, College of Pharmaceutical Science, Beihua University, Changchun, Jilin 132013, P.R. China
| | - Nanxi Zhao
- Department of Microbial and Biochemical Pharmacy, College of Pharmaceutical Science, Beihua University, Changchun, Jilin 132013, P.R. China
| | - Jingbo Sun
- Department of Microbial and Biochemical Pharmacy, College of Pharmaceutical Science, Beihua University, Changchun, Jilin 132013, P.R. China
| | - Xun Zhu
- Department of Immunology, Norman Bethune College of Medicine, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130021, P.R. China
| | - Peige Du
- Department of Microbial and Biochemical Pharmacy, College of Pharmaceutical Science, Beihua University, Changchun, Jilin 132013, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kireeva GS, Gafton GI, Guseynov KD, Senchik KY, Belyaeva OA, Bespalov VG, Panchenko AV, Maydin MA, Belyaev AM. HIPEC in patients with primary advanced ovarian cancer: Is there a role? A systematic review of short- and long-term outcomes. Surg Oncol 2018; 27:251-258. [PMID: 29937179 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2018.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2017] [Revised: 02/13/2018] [Accepted: 05/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
A systematic review of the studies where HIPEC combined with cytoreductive surgery was used in patients with primary advanced ovarian cancer was performed to understand is there a role for this treatment modality not only in recurrent but in primary advanced ovarian cancer. The results are controversial but there is a strong trend for improvement of the long-term outcomes of patients with primary advanced ovarian cancer after HIPEC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G S Kireeva
- N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health, 68, Leningradskaya Str., Pesochny, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 197758.
| | - G I Gafton
- N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health, 68, Leningradskaya Str., Pesochny, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 197758
| | - K D Guseynov
- N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health, 68, Leningradskaya Str., Pesochny, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 197758
| | - K Y Senchik
- N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health, 68, Leningradskaya Str., Pesochny, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 197758
| | - O A Belyaeva
- N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health, 68, Leningradskaya Str., Pesochny, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 197758
| | - V G Bespalov
- N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health, 68, Leningradskaya Str., Pesochny, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 197758
| | - A V Panchenko
- N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health, 68, Leningradskaya Str., Pesochny, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 197758
| | - M A Maydin
- N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health, 68, Leningradskaya Str., Pesochny, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 197758
| | - A M Belyaev
- N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health, 68, Leningradskaya Str., Pesochny, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 197758
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Leijte GP, Custers H, Gerretsen J, Heijne A, Roth J, Vogl T, Scheffer GJ, Pickkers P, Kox M. Increased Plasma Levels of Danger-Associated Molecular Patterns Are Associated With Immune Suppression and Postoperative Infections in Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy. Front Immunol 2018; 9:663. [PMID: 29675023 PMCID: PMC5895648 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00663] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2017] [Accepted: 03/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) can elicit immune responses and may subsequently induce an immune-suppressed state. Previous work showed that increased plasma levels of DAMPs are associated with immune suppression and increased susceptibility toward infections in trauma patients. Like trauma, major surgical procedures, such as cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), are also thought to cause profound DAMP release. Furthermore, the incidence of postoperative infections in these patients, ranging from 10 to 36%, is very high compared to that observed in patients undergoing other major surgical procedures. We hypothesized that the double hit of surgical trauma (CRS) in combination with HIPEC causes excessive DAMP release, which in turn contributes to the development of immune suppression. To investigate this, we assessed DAMP release in patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC, and investigated its relationship with immune suppression and postoperative infections. Methods In 20 patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC, blood was obtained at five time points: just before surgery (baseline), after CRS, after HIPEC, at ICU admission, and 1 day after surgery. Circulating levels of DAMPs [heat shock protein (HSP)70, high mobility group box (HMGB)1, S100A12, S100A8/S100A9, nuclear (n)DNA, mitochondrial (mt)DNA, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), a marker of unscheduled cell death], and cytokines [tumor necrosis factor (TNF)α, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1α, MIP-1β, and MCP-1] were measured. The extent of immune suppression was determined by measuring HLA-DR gene expression and ex vivo leukocytic cytokine production capacity. Results Plasma levels of DAMPs (maximum fold increases of HSP70: 2.1 [1.5–2.8], HMGB1: 5.9 [3.2–9.8], S100A8/S100A9: 3.6 [1.8–5.6], S100A12: 2.6 [1.8–4.3], nDNA 3.9 [1.0–10.8], LDH 1.7 [1.2–2.5]), and all measured cytokines increased profoundly following CRS-HIPEC. Evidence of immune suppression was already apparent during the procedure, illustrated by a decrease of HLA-DR expression compared with baseline (0.5-fold [0.3–0.9]) and diminished ex vivo pro-inflammatory cytokine production capacity. The increase in HMGB1 levels correlated with the decrease in HLA-DR expression (r = −0.46, p = 0.04), and peak HMGB1 concentrations were significantly higher in the five patients who went on to develop a postoperative infection (p = 0.04). Conclusion CRS-HIPEC is associated with profound DAMP release and immune suppression, and plasma HMGB1 levels are related with the occurrence of postoperative infections in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guus P Leijte
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.,Radboud Center for Infectious Diseases, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Hettie Custers
- Department of Anesthesiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Jelle Gerretsen
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.,Radboud Center for Infectious Diseases, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Amon Heijne
- Department of Anesthesiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Johannes Roth
- Institute of Immunology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Thomas Vogl
- Institute of Immunology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Gert J Scheffer
- Department of Anesthesiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Peter Pickkers
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.,Radboud Center for Infectious Diseases, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Matthijs Kox
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.,Radboud Center for Infectious Diseases, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Perfusion Chemotherapy and Cytoreductive Surgery for Controlling Malignant Ascites From Ovarian Cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2018; 26:1571-1579. [PMID: 27779544 DOI: 10.1097/igc.0000000000000809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Malignant ascites, a complication often seen in patients with ovarian cancer (OC), is difficult to treat, but hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has a good efficacy. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with HIPEC for controlling malignant ascites from OC. MATERIALS AND METHODS From December 2009 until December 2014, 53 patients with OC and malignant ascites were treated with CRS and HIPEC. Patients in good health condition were treated with CRS followed by HIPEC (CRS + HIPEC), and patients in poor health condition were treated initially with B-mode ultrasound-guided HIPEC followed by delayed CRS upon improvement of their health condition (HIPEC + delayed CRS). Resolution of ascites, complete CRS, overall survival, and disease-free survival were analyzed. RESULTS All patients showed ascites regression. The total objective remission rate was 100%, even for patients in the poor condition group before CRS. Complete CRS was successful in 30 (88.23%) of 34 patients in the good condition group, and 17 (89.47%) of 19 patients in the poor condition group (P > 0.05). Median disease-free survival and median overall survival were 21 and 39 months in the good condition group, and 22 and 38 months in the poor condition group, respectively (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy is effective at controlling ascites in patients with OC, even for patients in poor condition before CRS, or when complete CRS is not feasible. Furthermore, the regression of ascites appears not to be dependent on complete resection.
Collapse
|
12
|
Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC in the First-Line and Interval Time Points of Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. INDIAN JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/s40944-017-0148-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
13
|
Owusu-Agyemang P, Zavala AM, Williams UU, Van Meter A, Soliz J, Kapoor R, Shah A, Hernandez M, Gottumukkala V, Cata JP. Assessing the impact of perioperative blood transfusions on the survival of adults undergoing cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for appendiceal carcinomatosis. Vox Sang 2017; 112:567-577. [DOI: 10.1111/vox.12546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2016] [Revised: 05/08/2017] [Accepted: 05/10/2017] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- P. Owusu-Agyemang
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston TX USA
- Anesthesiology and Surgical Oncology Research Group; Houston TX USA
| | - A. M. Zavala
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston TX USA
| | - U. U. Williams
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston TX USA
| | - A. Van Meter
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston TX USA
| | - J. Soliz
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston TX USA
| | - R. Kapoor
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston TX USA
| | - A. Shah
- The University of Texas Medical School; Houston TX USA
| | - M. Hernandez
- Department of Biostatistics; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston TX USA
| | - V. Gottumukkala
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston TX USA
| | - J. P. Cata
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston TX USA
- Anesthesiology and Surgical Oncology Research Group; Houston TX USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
1st Evidence-based Italian consensus conference on cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal carcinosis from ovarian cancer. TUMORI JOURNAL 2017; 103:525-536. [PMID: 28430350 DOI: 10.5301/tj.5000623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/09/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Ovarian cancer (OC) remains relatively rare, although it is among the top 4 causes of cancer death for women younger than 50. The aggressive nature of the disease and its often late diagnosis with peritoneal involvement have an impact on prognosis. The current scientific literature presents ambiguous or uncertain indications for management of peritoneal carcinosis (PC) from OC, both owing to the lack of sufficient scientific data and their heterogeneity or lack of consistency. Therefore, the Italian Society of Surgical Oncology (SICO), the Italian Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, the Italian Association of Hospital Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, and the Italian Association of Medical Oncology conducted a multidisciplinary consensus conference (CC) on management of advanced OC presenting with PC during the SICO annual meeting in Naples, Italy, on September 10-11, 2015. An expert committee developed questions on diagnosis and staging work-up, indications, and procedural aspects for peritonectomy, systemic chemotherapy, and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for PC from OC. These questions were provided to 6 invited speakers who answered with an evidence-based report. Each report was submitted to a jury panel, representative of Italian experts in the fields of surgical oncology, gynecology, and medical oncology. The jury panel revised the reports before and after the open discussion during the CC. This article is the final document containing the clinical evidence reports and statements, revised and approved by all the authors before submission.
Collapse
|
15
|
Sun JH, Ji ZH, Yu Y, Wu HT, Huang CQ, Zhang Q, Yang XJ, Yonemura Y, Li Y. Cytoreductive Surgery plus Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy to Treat Advanced/Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Results from a Retrospective Study on Prospectively Established Database. Transl Oncol 2016; 9:130-138. [PMID: 27084429 PMCID: PMC4833965 DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2016.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2015] [Revised: 02/14/2016] [Accepted: 02/24/2016] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the best standard treatment, optimal cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and platinum/taxane-based chemotherapy, prognosis of advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) remains poor. Recently, CRS plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been developed to treat peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). This study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CRS+HIPEC to treat PC from advanced/recurrent EOC. METHODS Forty-six PC patients from advanced EOC (group A) or recurrent EOC (group B) were treated by 50 CRS+HIPEC procedures. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS); the secondary endpoints were safety profiles. RESULTS The median OS was 74.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 8.5-139.5] for group A versus 57.5 months (95% CI 29.8-85.2) for group B (P = .68). The median PFS was not reached for group A versus 8.5 months (95% CI 0-17.5) for group B (P = .034). Better median OS correlated with peritoneal cancer index (PCI) < 20 (76.6 months for PCI ≤ 20 group vs 38.5 months for PCI > 20 group, P = .01), complete cyroreduction (residual disease ≤ 2.5 mm) [79.5 months for completeness of cytoreduction (CC) score 0-1 vs 24.3 months for CC 2-3, P = .00], and sensitivity to platinum (65.3 months for platinum-sensitive group vs 20.0 for platinum-resistant group, P = .05). Serious adverse events occurred in five patients (10.0%). Multivariate analysis identified CC score as the only independent factor for better survival. CONCLUSION For advanced/recurrent EOC, CRS+HIPEC could improve OS with acceptable safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian-Hua Sun
- Department of Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors & Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center, Wuhan, 430071, P. R. China; Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Enshi Autonomous Prefecture Hospital, Enshi, Hubei, 445000, P. R. China
| | - Zhong-He Ji
- Department of Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors & Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center, Wuhan, 430071, P. R. China
| | - Yang Yu
- Department of Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors & Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center, Wuhan, 430071, P. R. China
| | - Hai-Tao Wu
- Department of Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors & Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center, Wuhan, 430071, P. R. China
| | - Chao-Qun Huang
- Department of Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors & Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center, Wuhan, 430071, P. R. China
| | - Qian Zhang
- Department of Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors & Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center, Wuhan, 430071, P. R. China
| | - Xiao-Jun Yang
- Department of Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors & Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center, Wuhan, 430071, P. R. China
| | - Yutaka Yonemura
- NPO Organization to Support Peritoneal Dissemination Treatment, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yan Li
- Department of Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors & Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center, Wuhan, 430071, P. R. China; Department of Peritoneal Cancer Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital Affiliated to the Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100038, P. R. China.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zhang T, Pan Q, Xiao S, Li L, Xue M. Docetaxel combined with intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion chemotherapy and hyperthermia in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer. Oncol Lett 2016; 11:3287-3292. [PMID: 27123104 PMCID: PMC4840847 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2016.4414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2016] [Accepted: 04/04/2016] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is a clinical type of gynecological malignant tumor with poor prognosis and a high mortality rate. At present, the primary treatment method used is surgery, with chemotherapy as an ajdunctive therapy. Thus, new short-term treatments should be identified. The aim of the present study was to investigate the short-term curative effects and safety of docetaxel combined with intraperitoneal cisplatin chemotherapy and hyperthermia treatment of advanced ovarian cancer. A total of 112 cases of advanced (stage III–IV) ovarian cancer patients confirmed by clinical diagnosis between October 2014 and December 2015 were included in the study. The patients were randomly divided into the study and control groups (n=56 cases). The control group was treated with docetaxel and intraperitoneal cisplatin hyperthermic perfusion chemotherapy, while the study group was treated with docetaxel venous chemotherapy and intraperitoneal cisplatin cyclical hyperthermic perfusion chemotherapy with BR-TRG-1 body cavity hyperthermic perfusion treatment system. Clinical treatment results for short-term curative effects and adverse reactions were compared and analyzed 8 weeks after treatment. The total effective rate of the study and control groups were 87.5 and 62.5%, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The controlled rate of ascites, remission rate of tumor and descent rate of CA125 of patients in the study group were better than patients in the control group (P<0.05). The rate of adverse reactions of patients in the study group was 39.3%, and the grade of toxicity was from I to II, while the rate of adverse reactions of patients in the control group was 55.4%, and the grade of toxicity was from II to III. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). In conclusion, applying the combination of docetaxel, intraperitoneal cisplatin hyperthermic perfusion chemotherapy and hyperthermia to treat advanced ovarian cancer can improve the curative effects with little toxicity; thus, it is worthy of promotion and application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ting Zhang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410013, P.R. China
| | - Qiong Pan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410013, P.R. China
| | - Songshu Xiao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410013, P.R. China
| | - Lijie Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410013, P.R. China
| | - Min Xue
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410013, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Vassos N, Förtsch T, Aladashvili A, Hohenberger W, Croner RS. Repeated cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in patients with recurrent peritoneal carcinomatosis. World J Surg Oncol 2016; 14:42. [PMID: 26912149 PMCID: PMC4765140 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-016-0804-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2015] [Accepted: 02/17/2016] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has become the treatment of choice for resectable peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) and improved the survival of these patients. The situation changes if PC recurs and repeated CRS with HIPEC is considered. The patient selection and outcome of the repeated approach has not been well described. We analyzed our cohort and share the experiences. Methods Ninety-three CRS/HIPEC procedures, performed in 85 patients during the period 2001–2013, were examined in a retrospective analysis. Type of primary, ECOG status, peritoneal cancer index (PCI), completeness of cytoreduction (CC), duration of hospitalization, postoperative morbidity, mortality, and disease-free/overall survival were reviewed. Results Six patients (7 %) underwent a second CRS/HIPEC (median interval between the two procedures: 26 months, range 8–61) including two patients with mesotheliomas, one patient with ovarian adenocarcinoma, one patient with leiomyosarcoma of uterus, one patient with colon adenocarcinoma, and one patient with appendiceal adenocarcinoma. The last two patients underwent a third CRS/HIPEC, 25 and 36 months, after the second procedure. The median PCI was 14 (range, 4–26) during the first and 20 (range, 7–39) during the second CRS/HIPEC of these patients. Completeness of cytoreduction score of 0 (CC-0) was achieved in all first procedures and in 67 % of second procedures (CC-0; n = 4 and CC-1; n = 2). A CC-0 score was possible in both of the third procedures. The mean operating time was 444 min (range, 198–642) and 427 min (range, 239–617) during the first and the second procedure. Median intensive care unit (ICU) was 2 days, and hospital stay after second CRS/HIPEC was 17 days (range, 7–50). The 30-day morbidity after repeated CRS/HIPEC was 33 % (16 % for grade III–IV complications), and there was no 30-day mortality neither after the second nor after the third CRS/HIPEC. Median disease-free interval between first CRS/HIPEC and peritoneal recurrence was 17 months (range, 8–30). Median disease-free survival of 18 months (range, 4–33) was achieved after the second CRS/HIPEC. After a median follow-up of 74 months (range, 39–151), all patients are alive with disease (n = 5) or disease free (n = 1) under chemotherapy. Conclusions In experienced centers, repeated CRS/HIPEC can be performed with safety. Patient selection and correct timing is of particular importance in achieving control of the disease. Repeated CRS/HIPEC should be considered as treatment option for selected patients with recurrent PC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolaos Vassos
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Krankenhausstrasse 12, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Thomas Förtsch
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Krankenhausstrasse 12, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Werner Hohenberger
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Krankenhausstrasse 12, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Roland S Croner
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Krankenhausstrasse 12, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bhatt A, Glehen O. The role of Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) in Ovarian Cancer: A Review. Indian J Surg Oncol 2016; 7:188-97. [PMID: 27065709 DOI: 10.1007/s13193-016-0501-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2016] [Accepted: 01/28/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer related deaths in women worldwide. It is usually diagnosed in an advanced stage (Stages III and IV) when peritoneal cancer spread has already occurred. The standard treatment comprises of surgery to remove all macroscopic disease followed by systemic chemotherapy. Despite all efforts, it recurs in over 75 % of the cases, most of these recurrences being confined to the peritoneal cavity. Recurrent ovarian cancer has a poor long term outcome and is generally treated with multiple lines of systemic chemotherapy and targeted therapy. The propensity of ovarian cancer to remain confined to the peritoneal cavity warrants an aggressive locoregional approach. The combined treatment comprising of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) that removes all macroscopic disease and HIPEC (Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy) has been effective in providing long term survival in selected patients with peritoneal metastases of gastrointestinal origin. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy used as adjuvant therapy has shown a survival benefit in ovarian cancer. This has prompted the use of CRS and HIPEC in the management of ovarian cancer as a part of first line therapy and second line therapy for recurrent disease. This article reviews the current literature and evidence for the use of HIPEC in ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aditi Bhatt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Fortis Hospital, Bangalore, India
| | - Olivier Glehen
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, 69495 Pierre-Bénite, Cedex France ; Université Lyon 1, EMR 3738, 69600 Oullins, France
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Baiocchi G, Ferreira FO, Mantoan H, da Costa AABA, Faloppa CC, Kumagai LY, de Mello CAL, Takahashi RM, Nakagawa WT, Aguiar S, Lopes A. Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy after Secondary Cytoreduction in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Single-center Comparative Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2015; 23:1294-301. [PMID: 26628430 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-4991-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although the standard of care after recurrence of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is chemotherapy, increasing data suggest that combining cytoreductive surgery with intraoperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a promising option for patients with recurrent EOC. Our aim was to determine the prognostic value of the addition of HIPEC to secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCR) in recurrent EOC. METHODS We analyzed a series of 79 patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent EOC who were treated from May 2000 to January 2014. Fifty patients who underwent SCR were compared to 29 who had SCR in combination with HIPEC. RESULTS The SCR group had a higher median age (58.4 years) compared to the SCR + HIPEC group (51.6 years) (p = 0.006). The median hospital stay length was longer for SCR + HIPEC versus SCR patients (11 and 8 days, respectively; p = 0.009). More subjects experienced National Cancer Institute grade III-IV morbidity in the SCR + HIPEC group (34.5 %) compared to the SCR group (10.6 %) (p = 0.015). Conversely, there were no deaths in the SCR + HIPEC group and 2 (4.0 %) deaths the SCR group. The median disease-free survival did not differ between SCR and SCR + HIPEC patients (18.6 and 15.8 months, respectively; p = 0.82); nor did median overall survival (59.3 and 58.3 months, respectively; p = 0.95). The presence of carcinomatosis was the only variable that remained linked to a higher risk of recurrence and death in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS Our data suggest that the addition of HIPEC to cytoreduction in patients with recurrent platinum-sensitive EOC does not improve survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Glauco Baiocchi
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.
| | | | - Henrique Mantoan
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Samuel Aguiar
- Department of Pelvic Surgery, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Ademar Lopes
- Department of Pelvic Surgery, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Cascales-Campos P, Gil J, Feliciangeli E, Parrilla P. HIPEC in ovarian cancer: Treatment of a new era or is it the end of the pipeline? Gynecol Oncol 2015; 139:363-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.06.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2015] [Revised: 05/15/2015] [Accepted: 06/08/2015] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
|
21
|
Topgül K, Çetinkaya MB, Çiğdem Arslan N, Gül MK, Çan M, Gürsel MF, Erdem D, Malazgirt Z. Cytoreductive surgery (SRC) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis: Our initial experience and technical details. Turk J Surg 2015; 31:138-47. [PMID: 26504417 PMCID: PMC4605109 DOI: 10.5152/ucd.2015.2990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2014] [Accepted: 01/22/2015] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to present our initial experience in peritoneal carcinomatosis treatment and the technical details of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the light of current literature. MATERIAL AND METHODS Data of 27 consecutive patients who were treated with CRS and HIPEC for peritoneal carcinomatosis in Medical Park Samsun Hospital, between November 2012 and September 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Treatment indication and management were evaluated at the multidisciplinary oncology council. All patients underwent CRS and HIPEC with the aim of complete cytoreduction. Patients with unresectable disease and/or palliative surgery were excluded from analysis. Perioperative complications were classified according to Clavien-Dindo classification, and HIPEC-related side effects were identified using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) criteria. Demographic, clinical and histopathological data of the patients were analyzed. RESULTS The mean age was 54 (32-72). Nineteen patients were female. The origin of peritoneal carcinomatosis was colorectal cancer in 12 patients, ovarian cancer in 12 patients, gastric cancer in 2 patients and pseudomyxoma peritonei in 1 patient. The mean Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index was 12 (3-32), with a mean operative time of 420 (300-660) minutes. Perioperative morbidity, HIPEC-related toxicity and perioperative mortality were observed in eight (30%), one (3.7%) and four patients (14.8%), respectively. During a mean follow up of 13 (1-22) months, overall and disease-free survival rates were 95.8% and 82.6%, respectively. Two patients with colorectal cancer (after 9 and 12 months) and one patient with ovarian cancer (after 11 months) had intra-abdominal recurrence. One patient with ovarian cancer had liver metastases 13 months after surgery, and underwent resection of segments 6-7. The remaining patients are being followed-up without any recurrence. CONCLUSION Cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC have favorable results in the treatment of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. Compatible with the literature, surgical outcomes of the presented series are encouraging for this treatment modality that have been recently popularized in our country. Careful perioperative evaluation, proper patient selection and multidisciplinary approach are essential for success in curative treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koray Topgül
- Department of General Surgery, İstanbul Kemerburgaz University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Bilge Çetinkaya
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ondokuz Mayıs University Faculty of Medicine, Samsun, Turkey
| | - N. Çiğdem Arslan
- Clinic of General Surgery, Tatvan State Hospital, Bitlis, Turkey
| | - Mustafa Kemal Gül
- Clinic of Medical Oncology, Medical Park Samsun Hospital, Samsun, Turkey
| | - Murat Çan
- Clinic of General Surgery, Medical Park Samsun Hospital, Samsun, Turkey
| | | | - Dilek Erdem
- Clinic of Medical Oncology, Medical Park Samsun Hospital, Samsun, Turkey
| | - Zafer Malazgirt
- Clinic of General Surgery, Medical Park Samsun Hospital, Samsun, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Randle RW, Votanopoulos KI, Shen P, Levine EA, Stewart JH. Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy. Surg Oncol 2015. [DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-1423-4_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
23
|
A critical appraisal of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the treatment of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2014; 136:130-5. [PMID: 25434634 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.11.072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2014] [Revised: 11/13/2014] [Accepted: 11/20/2014] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Our objective was to review the published experiences of the use of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the treatment of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer with a focus on survival outcomes. METHODS A search of the PubMed database (2008-2014) for articles specifically addressing the topic "HIPEC and ovarian cancer" was performed. We found a total of 22 publications that included 1450 patients. A final group of eleven studies (248 patients with advanced ovarian cancer) and eight publications (499 patients with recurrent sensitive ovarian cancer) that included information about survival were reviewed. RESULTS Among patients with primary ovarian cancer who were treated with primary debulking and HIPEC, the weighted median overall survival was 37.3 months (range 27-78), the median disease-free survival was 14.4 months (range 12-30), and the 5-yr-survival rate was 40% (range 28-72). In the recurrent cohort, the overall survival after HIPEC was 36.5 months (range 23-62), and the median disease-free survival was 20.2 months (range 11-29). The rates of severe morbidity were 25 and 19% in the primary and recurrent groups, respectively. CONCLUSION Although randomized trials are ongoing, the recently published retrospective data regarding the use of HIPEC for primary advanced and for recurrent ovarian cancer do not indicate any apparent advantage of this treatment in terms of the survival outcomes in these patients. Therefore, HIPEC cannot be considered a standard treatment and should not be offered outside of clinical trials.
Collapse
|
24
|
Intraperitoneal chemotherapy from Armstrong to HIPEC: challenges and promise. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2014; 15:27-40. [PMID: 24338278 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-013-0264-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OPINION The treatment of advanced stage ovarian, primary peritoneal and fallopian tube cancer represents a therapeutic challenge as evidenced by the 70 %-80 % recurrence rate. Our understanding of the synergy between surgical cytoreduction and effective systemic chemotherapy continues to evolve, with research supporting maximal cytoreductive effort followed by intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Specifically, analysis of phase III clinical trials has shown a median survival of 110 months in those treated with intraperitoneal chemotherapy, when surgery results in no visible residual disease. Additionally, incorporation of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy at the time of surgical resection has gained attention as an alternate therapeutic option, in an attempt to obviate toxicities encountered with repetitive cycles of intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Currently, surgical cytoreduction in the hands of an experienced gynecologic oncologist, followed by intraperitoneal chemotherapy is thought to portend the greatest survival benefit in patients with advanced stage ovarian cancer spectrum cancers. Additional investigation regarding the oncologic outcomes and morbidity of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy is warranted.
Collapse
|
25
|
Ahmed S, Stewart JH, Shen P, Votanopoulos KI, Levine EA. Outcomes with cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC for peritoneal metastasis. J Surg Oncol 2014; 110:575-84. [DOI: 10.1002/jso.23749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2014] [Accepted: 07/16/2014] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Shuja Ahmed
- Surgical Oncology Service; Department of General Surgery; Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center; Winston Salem North Carolina
| | - John H. Stewart
- Surgical Oncology Service; Department of General Surgery; Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center; Winston Salem North Carolina
| | - Perry Shen
- Surgical Oncology Service; Department of General Surgery; Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center; Winston Salem North Carolina
| | - Konstantinos I. Votanopoulos
- Surgical Oncology Service; Department of General Surgery; Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center; Winston Salem North Carolina
| | - Edward A. Levine
- Surgical Oncology Service; Department of General Surgery; Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center; Winston Salem North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Ba M, Long H, Zhang X, Tang Y, Wu Y, Yu F, Wang S, Cui S. Different sequential approaches of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in treating ovarian cancer with malignant ascites. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2014; 140:1497-506. [DOI: 10.1007/s00432-014-1692-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2014] [Accepted: 04/19/2014] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
27
|
Lotti M, Busci LM, Campanati L, Catena F, Coccolini F, Bakrin N, Iaco PD, Ercolani G, Grosso G, Pisano M, Poiasina E, Rossetti D, Rossi M, Zamagni C, Bertoli P, Pinna AD, Frigerio L, Ansaloni L. Cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. World J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 2:167-175. [DOI: 10.5317/wjog.v2.i4.167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2013] [Revised: 04/23/2013] [Accepted: 07/11/2013] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM: To reduce postoperative complications and to make possible an optimal cytoreduction, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by interval debulking surgery has been applied with encouraging results.
METHODS: Between December 2009 and February 2012, patients with stage IIIC-IV epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) underwent diagnostic laparoscopy, to assess the feasibility of optimal debulking surgery. The modified Fagotti score was applied to assess the feasibility of resection with zero residual tumor. Patients who were not candidate for upfront debulking surgery were submitted to NACT, then reassessed according to the RECIST 1.1 criteria and submitted to cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) if they showed clinical response or stable disease. The remaining cycles of adjuvant systemic chemotherapy (ASCT) were administered postoperatively, to complete 6 cycles of systemic chemotherapy.
RESULTS: Nine patients were included. Clinical response to NACT was complete in 3 patients and partial in 5 patients; one patient had stable disease. All patients underwent CRS resulting in CC0 disease prior to HIPEC. Average operative time was 510 min. Average intensive care unit stay was 2 d. Average postoperative hospital stay was 25 d. No postoperative mortality was observed. One patient experienced pelvic abscess. One patient refused ASCT. The remaining 8 patients started ASCT. Average time to chemotherapy was 36 d. All patients are alive, with an average follow up of 11 mo. Eight patients are disease-free at follow up.
CONCLUSION: HIPEC after CRS for advanced EOC is feasible with acceptable morbidity and mortality. NACT may increase the chance for achieving complete cytoreduction. Phase 3 studies are needed to determine the effects of HIPEC on survival.
Collapse
|
28
|
Eskander RN, Ansaloni L, Bristow RE, Coccolini F. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in epithelial ovarian cancer: State of the art. World J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 2:94-100. [DOI: 10.5317/wjog.v2.i4.94] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2012] [Accepted: 08/06/2013] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is difficult to treat with low overall cure rates. A new strategy combining maximal cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with intra-operative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been proposed to treat advanced stage EOC in the primary setting. Numerous small, heterogeneous studies have been conducted exploring outcomes in patients with predominantly advanced, recurrent or refractory disease treated with CRS + HIPEC. Although morbidity rates approaching 35% have been reported, oncologic outcomes are promising. Incorporation of HIPEC for the treatment of primary EOC has continued to gain interest. Several prospective phase 2 clinical trials were recently completed evaluating the impact of CRS + HIPEC in the primary setting. This article will briefly discuss the benefits of optimal surgical cytoreduction and the theoretical basis of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with advanced stage EOC, and will then review existing literature describing oncologic outcomes in EOC patients treated with HIPEC in the primary setting.
Collapse
|
29
|
Wong J, Koch AL, Deneve JL, Fulp W, Tanvetyanon T, Dessureault S. Repeat cytoreductive surgery and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy may offer survival benefit for intraperitoneal mesothelioma: a single institution experience. Ann Surg Oncol 2013; 21:1480-6. [PMID: 24158467 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-013-3341-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2013] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cytoreduction with heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has demonstrated improved overall survival (OS) in malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM). The role of repeated HIPEC for MPM is less clear. METHODS An institutional review board-approved database of MPM patients was analyzed for clinical factors and outcomes. RESULTS From June 2004 to March 2012, 29 patients underwent surgical treatment for mesothelioma. HIPEC was aborted in 3 and completed in 26; 8 underwent additional repeat HIPEC. The majority was male (62 %), median age 66 years. There was no significant difference in surgery duration, blood loss, or hospital-stay-duration between initial and repeat HIPEC. Cisplatin was the chemotherapy used. Complications occurred in 17 (65 %) initial and 6 (50 %) repeat HIPEC, with wound complications being most common. Reoperation was less common (4 % initial and 25 % repeat), and perioperative death was rare (4 % initial, 0 % repeat). Fourteen (54 %) initial and seven (58 %) repeat HIPEC patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. Median time from HIPEC to initiation of chemotherapy was not different between initial and repeat HIPEC (8.8 and 4.6 months, respectively, p = 0.68). Median treatment-free time (time from initial to repeat HIPEC or chemotherapy) also was not different between initial and repeat HIPEC (8.8 and 6.3 months, respectively, p = 0.92). Median OS for the cohort was 41.2 months. Patients who underwent repeat HIPEC had improved median OS (80 months) versus single HIPEC (27.2 months; p = 0.007). A lower peritoneal carcinoma index and complete cytoreduction were associated positively with OS. CONCLUSIONS Cytoreduction and HIPEC for MPM are associated with longer OS. Patients who are candidates for repeat HIPEC may derive an even greater OS advantage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joyce Wong
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA,
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the incidence of bowel injury in operations requiring adhesiolysis and to assess the impact of adhesiolysis on the incidence of surgical complications, postoperative morbidity, and costs. BACKGROUND Morbidity of adhesiolysis during abdominal surgery seems an important health care problem, but the direct impact of adhesiolysis on inadvertent organ damage, morbidity, and costs is unknown. METHODS In a prospective cohort study, detailed data on adhesiolysis were gathered by direct observation during elective abdominal surgery. Comparison was made between surgical procedures with and without adhesiolysis on the incidence of inadvertent bowel defects. Secondary outcomes were the effect of adhesiolysis and bowel injury on surgical complications, other morbidity, and costs. RESULTS A total of 755 (out of 844) surgeries in 715 patients were included. Adhesiolysis was required in 475 (62.9%) of operations. Median adhesiolysis time was 20 minutes (range: 1-177). Fifty patients (10.5%) undergoing adhesiolysis inadvertently incurred bowel defect, compared with 0 (0%) without adhesiolysis (P < 0.001). In univariate and multivariate analyses, adhesiolysis was associated with an increase of sepsis incidence [odds ratio (OR): 5.12; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.06-24.71], intra-abdominal complications (OR: 3.46; 95% CI: 1.49-8.05) and wound infection (OR: 2.45; 95% CI: 1.01-5.94), longer hospital stay (2.06 ± 1.06 days), and higher hospital costs [$18,579 (15,204-21,954) vs $14,063 (12,471-15,655)]. Mortality after adhesiolysis complicated by a bowel defect was 4 out of 50 (8%), compared with 7 out of 425 (1.6%) after uncomplicated adhesiolysis (OR: 5.19; 95% CI: 1.47-18.41). CONCLUSIONS Adhesiolysis and inadvertent bowel injury have a large negative effect on the convalescence after abdominal surgery. The awareness of adhesion-related morbidity during reoperation and the prevention of postsurgical adhesion deserve priority in research and clinical practice.
Collapse
|
31
|
Preclinical antitumor activity of a nanoparticulate SN38. Invest New Drugs 2013; 31:871-80. [DOI: 10.1007/s10637-012-9919-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2012] [Accepted: 12/19/2012] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
|
32
|
Chan DL, Morris DL, Rao A, Chua TC. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy in ovarian cancer: a review of tolerance and efficacy. Cancer Manag Res 2012; 4:413-22. [PMID: 23226073 PMCID: PMC3514065 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s31070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE TO REVIEW THE TWO MAIN APPROACHES OF INTRAPERITONEAL (IP) CHEMOTHERAPY DELIVERY IN OVARIAN CANCER: postoperative adjuvant IP chemotherapy after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and intraoperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). METHODS A literature search was conducted to identify studies that employed postoperative adjuvant IP chemotherapy after CRS or combined CRS and intraoperative HIPEC in patients with ovarian cancer. Data of interest included chemotherapy protocol, morbidity and mortality, and survival data. RESULTS Three large randomized controlled trials comprising 707 patients with advanced ovarian cancer who received postoperative adjuvant IP chemotherapy were reviewed. Morbidity rate ranged from 56% to 94% in IP chemotherapy, and mortality rate ranged from 1% to 2%. Median disease-free survival ranged from 24 to 28 months, and overall survival ranged from 49 to 66 months. Planned chemotherapy completion rates ranged from 42% to 71%. Twenty-four nonrandomized studies that reported HIPEC comprised 1167 patients with both advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer. In patients with advanced ovarian cancer, mortality ranged from 0% to 5%, minor morbidity ranged from 16% to 90%, and major morbidity ranged from 0% to 40%. Median disease-free survival ranged from 13 to 56 months, and overall survival ranged from 14 to 64 months. Survival at 5 years ranged from 35% to 70%. In patients with recurrent ovarian cancer, the mortality rate ranged from 0% to 10%, minor morbidity ranged from 7% to 90%, and major morbidity ranged from 0% to 49%. Median disease-free survival ranged from 13 to 24 months and overall survival from 23 to 49 months. Survival at 5 years ranged from 12% to 54%. CONCLUSION There is level-one evidence suggesting the benefit of postoperative adjuvant intraperitoneal chemotherapy for patients with advanced ovarian cancer after cytoreductive surgery, albeit catheter-related complications resulted after treatment discontinuation. Studies report the use of HIPEC predominantly in the setting of recurrent disease and have demonstrated encouraging results, which merits further investigation in future clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel L Chan
- Hepatobiliary and Surgical Oncology Unit, UNSW Department of Surgery, and the St George Clinical School, University of New South Wales, St George Hospital, Kogarah, NSW, Australia
| | - David L Morris
- Hepatobiliary and Surgical Oncology Unit, UNSW Department of Surgery, and the St George Clinical School, University of New South Wales, St George Hospital, Kogarah, NSW, Australia
| | - Archana Rao
- Hepatobiliary and Surgical Oncology Unit, UNSW Department of Surgery, and the St George Clinical School, University of New South Wales, St George Hospital, Kogarah, NSW, Australia
| | - Terence C Chua
- Hepatobiliary and Surgical Oncology Unit, UNSW Department of Surgery, and the St George Clinical School, University of New South Wales, St George Hospital, Kogarah, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|