The impact of biopsy technique on upstaging, residual disease, and outcome in cutaneous melanoma

Deep Margins Melanoma: How Deep Is Deep Enough?

BACKGROUND

Wide excision (WE) to muscular fascia for invasive melanoma is common practice but excision to subcutaneous tissue may be adequate. We evaluated practice patterns regarding depth of biopsy and excision as well as risks for recurrence.

METHODS

Retrospective review of patients with pT1-4 melanoma (cN0) treated with WE at a single institution was performed. Patient factors were evaluated. Biopsy and excision techniques were compared to pathology and reviewed for recurrence.

RESULTS

385 patients from 2006 to 2020 were included. Lesions were on the extremity (n = 189), head/neck (n = 48), trunk (n = 148). Biopsy techniques included shave (n = 330), excisional (n = 36), punch (n = 10), incisional (n = 9). Deep biopsy margins were positive for IM/melanoma in situ in 139 patients. WE specimens were taken to muscular fascia (n = 218) or mid/deep fat (n = 144). 51 patients had recurrent disease or a new primary lesion: locoregional (n = 31), distant (3), or new lesions (n = 17).

DISCUSSION

Patient characteristics associated with recurrence include older age and female gender. Tumor characteristics associated with recurrence include lesions located on the trunk, superficial spreading melanoma, ulceration, perineural invasion, and clinical T and P stage. Patients that recurred were more likely to have WE taken to or including muscular fascia. Biopsy type, deep margin on biopsy, and depth of dissection was not associated with recurrence.

To Evaluate the Efficacy of Diagnostic Periocular Punch Biopsy: Using a 4-mm Dermatology Punch

PURPOSE

The dermatological punch biopsy is a minimally invasive procedure that provides conclusive diagnosis when managing periocular lesions. It aids with establishing histological diagnosis and subtype thereby facilitating management planning and eliminates the risk of unnecessary tissue sacrifice. The present literature provides limited evidence evaluating the value of punch biopsy in diagnosing periocular lesions.

METHODS

A retrospective case note analysis of 400 consecutive 4-mm periocular punch biopsies performed between 2005 and 2016, from 353 patients was undertaken at a single institution. Three hundred fifty-nine lesions had an initial definite clinical diagnosis of malignancy (group A) and the remaining 41 lesions had an uncertain clinical diagnosis with enough suspicion to merit a biopsy (group B).

RESULTS

In group A, 75.5% (n = 271) of the biopsies verified the clinical diagnosis of malignancy and 24.5% (n = 88) were benign. In group B, 70.7% (n = 29) of the lesions were benign and 29.3% (n = 12) were malignant and were subsequently treated as group A. Only 4, group A biopsies, which underwent formal excision, did not initially diagnose a malignancy (punch biopsy was repeated) providing a sensitivity of 98.6% and a specificity of 100%. One hundred seventeen were found to be benign avoiding unnecessary tissue sacrifice in 29.25% of cases.

CONCLUSION

Our study provides the largest sample size in the literature that evaluates a 4-mm diagnostic periocular punch biopsy in managing eyelid lesions. In 29.5% of punch biopsies, unnecessary tissue sacrifice was avoided as they were histologically benign. The authors found that punch biopsies for lesions <7 mm carry a risk of inadvertent excision of lesion.

Factors Associated With Upstaging of Melanoma Thickness on Final Excision

INTRODUCTION

The incidence and risk factors associated with upstaging from initial biopsy to definitive excision in cutaneous melanoma have not been established. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of tumor stage upstaging and associated risk factors using the National Cancer Database.

METHODS

A retrospective study of the National Cancer Database between 2012 and 2016 was performed. The cohort of patients undergoing excision of melanoma with available data comprised 133,592 patients. Differences in characteristics for upstaging were determined using Wilcox rank-sum, chi-square, or Fisher's exact tests. Multivariable analysis was performed using logistic regression to determine factors associated with upstaging.

RESULTS

Incidence of upstaging was 5.2%. Upstaged patients were older, male, of non-White race, and of lower education level (P < 0.001). Lesions of the head/neck and lower extremity had increased incidence of upstaging compared to the trunk (P < 0.001). Nodular and acral lentiginous melanoma was associated with higher incidence of upstaging compared to superficial spreading melanoma (P < 0.001). Patients with lymphovascular invasion had increased risk of upstaging (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Upstaging of melanoma is infrequent but is significantly more prevalent in non-White patients and those with lower educational status. Provider and patient education should include the higher risk of upstaging in these groups and the possible need for further surgical intervention, such as re-excision of margins and sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Does Residual Invasive Disease in Wide Local Excision after Diagnosis with Partial Biopsy Technique Influence Survival in Melanoma? Matched-Pair Analysis of Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial I and II

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines recommend excisional/complete biopsy for melanoma diagnosis, owing to high rates of residual disease found at wide local excision (WLE) after partial biopsy techniques. We sought to determine any survival disadvantage associated with the presence of residual invasive melanoma in the WLE after diagnosis with a partial biopsy technique.

STUDY DESIGN

Data were examined from Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trials I and II (MSLT-I and -II), 2 large melanoma trials. Patients diagnosed with excisional/complete biopsy were excluded. Clinicopathologic characteristics, melanoma-specific survival (MSS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and disease-free survival (DFS) of those with residual invasive melanoma in the definitive WLE and those with no residual melanoma were compared. Matched pairing was used to reduce variability between groups.

RESULTS

From 1994 through 2014, 3,939 patients were enrolled in these trials and 874 (22%) were diagnosed using partial biopsy techniques. Of these, 399 (46%) had residual tumor in the WLE. Only 6 patients had residual tumor in their WLE resulting in T-upstaging of their tumor. Match-pairing formed two cohorts (1:1) of patients with and without residual invasive tumor after WLE. A total of 514 patients were paired; 288 (56%) males, 148 (28.8%) aged 60 or older, 192 (37.4%) with truncal melanomas, 214 (41.6%) had Breslow thickness 2 mm or greater, and 376 (73.2%) had positive sentinel nodes. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no statistical difference in 10-year MSS (73.6% ± 3.3% vs 73.9% ± 3.7%, p = 0.891), DDFS (68.7% ± 3.4% vs 65.3% ± 4.0%, p = 0.548), or DFS (59.6% ± 3.7% vs 59.4% ± 3.9%, p = 0.783).

CONCLUSIONS

Survival in patients with primary melanoma does not appear to be worse in patients who undergo a partial biopsy technique and are later found to have residual invasive tumor in the WLE specimen.

Incisional Biopsy Technique Is Associated With Decreased Overall Survival for Cutaneous Melanoma

BACKGROUND

Previous studies examining melanoma biopsy technique have not demonstrated an effect on overall survival.

OBJECTIVE

To examine overall survival of patients with cutaneous melanoma diagnosed by shave, punch, incisional, or excisional techniques from the National Cancer Database (NCDB).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Melanoma data from the 2004 to 2016 NCDB data set were analyzed. A Cox proportional hazards model was constructed to assess the risk of 5-year all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

In total, 42,272 cases of melanoma were reviewed, with 27,899 (66%) diagnosed by shave biopsy, 8,823 (20.9%) by punch biopsy, and 5,550 (13.1%) by incisional biopsy. Both the univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that tumors diagnosed by incisional biopsy had significantly (p = .001) lower overall 5-year survival compared with shave techniques (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.140, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.055 to 1.231). We found no difference (p = .109) between shave and punch biopsy techniques (HR 1.062, 95% CI 0.987-1.142) or between punch and incisional techniques (HR 1.074, 95% CI 0.979-1.177, p = .131).

CONCLUSION

Incisional biopsies were associated with decreased overall 5-year survival in the NCDB. No difference was observed between shave and punch biopsy techniques. These findings support current melanoma management guidelines.

Management of Transected Invasive Melanoma: A Single Institution Retrospective Review

BACKGROUND

Deep transection of invasive melanoma precludes accurate measurement of Breslow depth, which may affect tumor staging.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the frequency of upstaging of transected invasive melanomas after excision, characterize the impact on National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCNN)-recommended treatment, and determine predictors of subsequent upstaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of invasive melanomas between January 2017 and December 2019 at a single institution. Deeply transected biopsy reports were compared with subsequent excisions to calculate the frequency of upstaging.

RESULTS

Three hundred sixty (49.6%) of 726 invasive melanomas identified were transected. Forty-nine (13.6%) transected tumors had upstaging that would have altered NCCN-recommended management. "Broadly" transected tumors had upstaging that would have resulted in a change in the management in 5/23 cases (21.7%) versus 2/41 cases (4.9%) for "focally" transected tumors (p = .038). Breslow depth increased by 0.59 mm on average for "broad" transection versus 0.06 mm for "focal" transection (p =< .01). Of the 89 transected pT1a melanomas, specimens with gross residual tumor or pigment after biopsy were upstaged in 8/17 (47.1%) of cases versus 5/72 (6.9%) of specimens without (p =< .01).

CONCLUSION

Upstaging of deeply transected invasive melanomas that would alter NCCN-recommended management occurred in 13.6% of cases. Broad transection and gross residual tumor or pigment after biopsy predicted higher likelihood of upstaging.

Rates of Upstaging, Between Diagnosis and Surgery, and Clinical Management of Metastatic Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Case-Control Study

BACKGROUND

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (cSCC) have upstage rates of approximately 10.3% to 11.1%. Data are currently limited on the rate of upstaging for metastatic cSCC.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the rates of upstaging, between diagnosis and surgery, and differences in management for metastatic and non-metastatic high-risk cSCC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective, case-control, single institution, multi-center study. Univariate analysis was used.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight subjects (34 metastatic & 34 non-metastatic) with 69 tumors were included. The overall rate of upstaging was 46.4%. The most common reasons for upstage were undocumented tumor size and under-diagnosis of poor differentiation. There were no differences in rates of upstaging. Preoperative imaging was performed in 43.6% of wide local excisions (WLE) versus 3.3% of Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS; p < .001). The median days from surgery to sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), or nodal dissection was shorter for WLE versus MMS (0 vs 221 days, p < .001).

CONCLUSION

Improved clinical documentation, including documenting tumor size, and the identification of pathologic risk factors, including poor differentiation and depth of invasion, are needed for proper staging. Preoperative imaging and discussion of SLNB may be beneficial for high-risk T2b and T3 tumors.

[Pitfalls in dermatohistology : Stumbling blocks and problems in routine dermatopathology]

Excisions and biopsies are firmly anchored in everyday dermatology. The biopsy, excision or diagnostic-therapeutic confirmation of the clinical diagnosis of neoplasms or inflammatory diseases is decisive for the dermatopathological diagnosis of tissue samples. Dermatopathology, however, is not a magic box into which a tissue sample can be placed without comment or information and receive-within 24 h at the latest-a complete, high-quality diagnosis. The present article describes problems, hurdles, and challenges in everyday dermatopathology that occur on the way to the microscope, even before the actual dermatopathological diagnosis takes place.

The impact of incomplete clinical information and initial biopsy technique on the histopathological diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Increased rates of histopathological misdiagnosis of melanoma have been associated with incisional punch more so than shave biopsy when compared with complete excisional biopsy. It is unknown how the increasing utilisation of shave biopsy may impact melanoma diagnosis. The extent to which the provision of clinical information to the pathologist may improve diagnostic accuracy remains unclear. This study assessed the impact of both initial biopsy technique and provision of adequate clinical information to pathologists on the accuracy of histopathological diagnosis of melanoma and disease progression.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort with nested case-control study of all histopathological false-negative and false-positive melanoma diagnoses from January 2014 to May 2019 from the Victorian Melanoma Service electronic database. Cases were assessed for the initial biopsy type, provision of clinical information on pathology request forms and disease progression associated with false-negative diagnosis.

RESULTS

Partial shave biopsy had higher odds of false-negative (OR 5.19, 95% CI 2.89-9.32; P < 0.001) and false-positive diagnoses (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.45-2.63; P < 0.001) of melanoma when compared with elliptical excisional biopsy. These odds ratios were comparable with those found with incisional punch biopsy. Providing the suspected clinical diagnosis to pathologists also reduced the odds of false-negative diagnosis with melanoma progression by 3.8-fold (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

The choice of initial biopsy technique and providing the suspected clinical diagnosis to pathologists are important for correct histopathological diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma and prevention of further disease progression.

Impact of Shave Biopsy on Diagnosis and Management of Cutaneous Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Melanoma is the most lethal skin cancer. Excision biopsy is generally recommended for clinically suspicious pigmented lesions; however, a proportion of cutaneous melanomas are diagnosed by shave biopsy. A systematic review was undertaken to investigate the impact of shave biopsy on tumor staging, treatment recommendations, and prognosis.

METHODOLOGY

The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant articles. Data on deep margin status on shave biopsy, tumor upstaging, and additional treatments on wide local excision (WLE), disease recurrence, and survival effect were analyzed across studies.

RESULTS

Fourteen articles from 2010 to 2020 were included. In total, 3713 patients had melanoma diagnosed on shave biopsy. Meta-analysis revealed a positive deep margin in 42.9% of shave biopsies. Following WLE, change in tumor stage was reported in 7.7% of patients. Additional treatment was recommended for 2.3% of patients in the form of either further WLE and/or sentinel lymph node biopsy. There was high heterogeneity across studies in all outcomes. Four studies reported survival, while no studies found any significant difference in disease-free or overall survival between shave biopsy and other biopsy modalities.

CONCLUSIONS

Just over 40% of melanomas diagnosed on shave biopsy report a positive deep margin; however, this translated into a change in tumor stage or treatment recommendations in relatively few patients (7.7% and 2.3%, respectively), with no impact on local recurrence or survival among the studies analyzed.

Non-radical primary diagnostic biopsies affect survival in cutaneous head and neck melanoma

BACKGROUND

It is unclear if a non-radical diagnostic biopsy entails a higher risk for metastasis and poorer survival for patients with cutaneous head and neck melanoma (cHNM).

AIMS/OBJECTIVES

To assess whether or not initial diagnostic biopsy modality and radicality (clear, positive, or narrow histopathological margins) influence recurrence and survival in patients with cHNM.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Histopathological radicality of initial diagnostic biopsies and outcome for 368 consecutive cHNM patients, clinically asymptomatic of metastatic disease and referred to a tertiary care academic center for sentinel lymph node staging from 2004 through 2018, were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Patients with positive (n = 133) or narrow (0.1-0.5 mm) (n = 34) histopathological margins had significantly worse loco-regional (p=.004) and distant control (p=.004) as well as lower overall (p=.017) and melanoma specific (p=.0002) survival than 201 patients with clear margins. Multivariate analysis indicated positive or narrow histopathological margins as independent negative prognostic factors for melanoma specific survival (HR 2.16, p=.015), together with deeper Breslow (HR 1.17, p=.00001) and ulceration (HR 2.49, p=.003).

CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE

Non-radical primary diagnostic biopsies increase the risk for metastatic disease and impair survival in cHNM. Accordingly, radical melanoma diagnostic procedures should be encouraged in the head and neck region when possible.

Think before you shave: Factors influencing choice of biopsy technique for invasive melanoma and effect on definitive management

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Partial biopsies are sometimes used for melanoma diagnosis with anticipated time and cost savings compared to excisional biopsy. However, their impact on subsequent melanoma management is unknown. Determine factors related to choice of partial over excisional biopsy to diagnose invasive melanoma and examine the effect of partial biopsies on definitive melanoma management.

METHOD

Retrospective repeated cross-sectional population-based study through the Victorian Cancer Registry of diagnosed melanomas in 2005, 2010 and 2015. A random sample of 400 patients per year, stratified by tumour thickness, was selected.

RESULTS

A total of 1200 patients had 833 excisional and 337 partial biopsies. Omission of suspected diagnosis on pathology requests affected 46% (532/1151) of all diagnostic biopsies. Diagnostic suspicion did not influence preference for partial over excisional biopsy [Odds Ratio (OR) 1.2, 95%CI 0.8-1.7; P = 0.40]. The partial:excisional biopsy usage ratio was higher in patients aged > 50 years than patients aged <50 years [relative risk ratios (RRR) 1.5; 95%CI 1.0 to 2.2; P = 0.03]. In 34% and 17% of tumours diagnosed with punch and shave, respectively, three procedures were required for definitive excision instead of two, compared with 5% of excisional biopsies When partial biopsy was used, patients were at greater risk of requiring three-staged excisions when controlled for age, anatomical site, melanoma subtype and thickness (RRR 6.7; 95%CI 4.4-10.1; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Diagnostic suspicion does not appear to be a major factor influencing choice of biopsy technique. Using partial biopsy to diagnose melanoma often leads to an extra procedure for definitive treatment compared with excisional biopsy.

Surgical Management of Lymph Nodes in Melanoma

This article provides a comprehensive evaluation of surgical management of the lymph node basin in melanoma, with historical, anatomic, and evidence-based recommendations for practice.

Economic Analysis of a Noninvasive Molecular Pathologic Assay for Pigmented Skin Lesions

Importance

A recently described noninvasive gene expression test (the pigmented lesion assay [PLA]) with adhesive patch-based sampling has the potential to rule out melanoma and the need for surgical biopsy of pigmented lesions suggestive of melanoma with a negative predictive value of 99% compared with 83% for the histopathologic standard of care. The cost implications of using this molecular test vs visual assessment followed by biopsy and histopathologic assessment (VAH) have not been evaluated.

Objective

To determine potential cost savings of PLA use vs the VAH pathway.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This health economic analysis performed from a US payer perspective was based on consensus treatment guidelines and fee schedules from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Data for model input were derived from routine use of the test in US dermatology practices and literature. Participants included patients with primary cutaneous pigmented lesions suggestive of melanoma. Data were analyzed from February 8 to December 1, 2017.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary analysis consisted of the relative reduction in costs of diagnostic surgical procedures for PLA vs VAH management. Additional analyses included stage-related treatment costs associated with delays in diagnosis.

Results

In the cost analysis for this economic model, the relative reduction in surgical procedure costs (biopsy and subsequent excision), assuming $0 for the PLA to facilitate multiple comparison scenarios, was -$395 compared with VAH. The relative reduction in stage-related treatment costs associated with the PLA was -$433 compared with VAH, primarily associated with avoidance of delays due to false-negative diagnoses. Surveillance costs were reduced by -$119 with the PLA. The total cost of fully adjudicating a lesion suggestive of melanoma by VAH was $947. At a mean selling price reference point for PLA of $500, cost savings of $447 (47%) per lesion tested could be realized.

Conclusions and Relevance

The results of this analysis suggest that the PLA reduces cost and may improve the care of patients with primary pigmented skin lesions suggestive of melanoma.

A meta-analysis on the influence of partial biopsy of primary melanoma on disease recurrence and patient survival

BACKGROUND

Complete surgical excision is the preferred biopsy type for suspicious melanocytic lesions. However, partial biopsy is sometimes used in special situations. Previous studies have explored the effect of partial biopsy of a primary melanoma on patient outcome with controversial results.

OBJECTIVE

We performed a meta-analysis on the influence of the type of biopsy of a primary melanoma on recurrence-free survival (RFS) and melanoma-related survival (MRS).

METHODS

Clinical trials, observational cohort studies and case-control studies reporting absolute number of recurrences and/or melanoma-related deaths in patients undergoing a partial or excisional biopsy of melanoma were included in the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

In all, the five included studies reported 3249 patients, 1121 (34.5%) of them in the partial biopsy group and 2128 (65.5%) in the excisional biopsy group. Despite a trend in favour of excisional biopsy in reducing the risk for recurrences, the forest plot related to RFS failed to demonstrate significant differences among groups (RR: 1.27; 95% CI 0.97-1.67; P: 0.09; random effects; I² : 55%). The forest plot showed no difference in the risk of dying for melanoma-related causes for patients undergoing partial biopsy vs. excisions biopsy (RR: 1.50; 95% CI 0.98-2.30; P: 0.06; random effects; I² : 60%).

LIMITATIONS

The majority of the studies were retrospective, and follow-up time was not uniform among studies and not always reported.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, a partial biopsy can be performed in special situations, such as large primary tumours located in surgically sensitive areas, without altering MRS and RFS.

Re-biopsy of partially sampled thin melanoma impacts sentinel lymph node sampling as well as surgical margins

AIM

To assess the impact of re-biopsy on partially sampled melanoma in situ (MIS), atypical melanocytic proliferation (AMP) and thin invasive melanoma.

MATERIALS & METHODS

We retrospectively identified cases of re-biopsied partially sampled neoplasms initially diagnosed as melanoma in situ, AMP or thin melanoma (Breslow depth ≤0.75 mm).

RESULTS & CONCLUSION

Re-biopsy led to sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in 18.3% of cases. No patients upstaged from AMP or MIS had a positive SLNB. One out of nine (11.1%) initially diagnosed as a thin melanoma ≤0.75 mm, upstaged with a re-biopsy, had a positive SLNB. After re-biopsy 8.5% underwent an increased surgical margin. Selective re-biopsy of partially sampled melanoma with gross residual disease can increase the accuracy of microstaging and optimize treatment regarding surgical margins and SLNB.

Current controversies in early-stage melanoma: Questions on management and surveillance

There are a number of controversies and uncertainties relating to the management and surveillance of patients with early-stage, localized (ie, stage 0, I, and II) cutaneous melanoma. While tumor stage is a critical predictor of clinical outcome and guides treatment, accurate determination of stage may be affected by the biopsy technique used and the method of sectioning before histologic review. A new molecular prognostic test is available but has not been formally incorporated into staging or treatment guidelines. There are no randomized controlled clinical trials to support guidelines for surveillance following the treatment of early-stage melanoma. In the second article in this continuing medical education series, we review the controversies and uncertainties relating to these issues. The questions we address are controversial because they speak to clinical scenarios for which there are no evidence-based guidelines or randomized clinical trials with the consequence of considerable variability in clinical practice. Our goal is to provide the clinician with up-to-date contextual knowledge to appreciate the multiple sides of each controversy and to suggest pathways to resolution.

Postbiopsy Pigmentation is Prognostic in Head and Neck Melanoma

PURPOSE

To assess postbiopsy pigmentation (PBP) as a prognostic feature in patients with cutaneous head and neck (H&N) melanoma.

METHODS

Retrospective review of patients undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for H&N melanoma (1998-2018). PBP was defined as visible remaining pigment at the scar or biopsy site that was documented on physical exam by both a medical oncologist and a surgeon at initial consultation. Variables associated with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Among 300 patients, 34.3% (n = 103) had PBP and 44.7% (n = 134) had microscopic residual disease on final pathology after wide local excision. Prognostic factors associated with DFS included advanced age, tumor depth, ulceration, PBP, and positive SLNB (p < 0.05). Patients with PBP fared worse than their counterparts without PBP in 5-year DFS [44.1% (31.1-56.3%) vs. 73.0% (64.1-80.0%); p < 0.001] and 5-year OS [65.0% (50.0-76.6%) vs. 83.6% (75.7-89.2%); p = 0.005]. After multivariable adjustment, PBP remained associated with shorter DFS [hazard ratio (HR) 1.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-2.93; p = 0.047], but was not prognostic of OS.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with H&N melanoma, PBP is associated with significantly shorter DFS. Patients with PBP may warrant greater consideration for SLNB and closer postoperative surveillance.

Current management of regional lymph nodes in patients with melanoma

The publication of recent randomized trials has prompted a significant shift in both our understanding and the management of patients with melanoma. Here, the current management of the regional lymph nodes in patients with melanoma is discussed. This review focuses on selection for sentinel lymph node biopsy, management of the positive sentinel node, management of the clinically positive node, and the controversy over the therapeutic value of early nodal intervention.

Guidelines of care for the management of primary cutaneous melanoma

The incidence of primary cutaneous melanoma continues to increase each year. Melanoma accounts for the majority of skin cancer-related deaths, but treatment is usually curative following early detection of disease. In this American Academy of Dermatology clinical practice guideline, updated treatment recommendations are provided for patients with primary cutaneous melanoma (American Joint Committee on Cancer stages 0-IIC and pathologic stage III by virtue of a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy). Biopsy techniques for a lesion that is clinically suggestive of melanoma are reviewed, as are recommendations for the histopathologic interpretation of cutaneous melanoma. The use of laboratory, molecular, and imaging tests is examined in the initial work-up of patients with newly diagnosed melanoma and for follow-up of asymptomatic patients. With regard to treatment of primary cutaneous melanoma, recommendations for surgical margins and the concepts of staged excision (including Mohs micrographic surgery) and nonsurgical treatments for melanoma in situ, lentigo maligna type (including topical imiquimod and radiation therapy), are updated. The role of sentinel lymph node biopsy as a staging technique for cutaneous melanoma is described, with recommendations for its use in clinical practice. Finally, current data regarding pregnancy and melanoma, genetic testing for familial melanoma, and management of dermatologic toxicities related to novel targeted agents and immunotherapies for patients with advanced disease are summarized.

Transected thin melanoma: Implications for sentinel lymph node staging

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Indications for sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in patients with thin melanoma (≤1 mm thick) are controversial. We asked whether deep margin (DM) positivity at initial biopsy of thin melanoma is associated with SLN positivity.

METHODS

Cases were identified using prospectively maintained databases at two melanoma centers. Patients who had undergone SLN biopsy for melanoma ≤1 mm were included. DM status was assessed for association with SLN metastasis in univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

1413 cases were identified, but only 1129 with known DM status were included. 39% of patients had a positive DM on original biopsy. DM-positive and DM-negative patients did not differ significantly in primary thickness, ulceration, or mitotic activity. DM-positive and DM-negative patients had similar incidence of SLN metastasis (5.7% vs 3.5%; P = 0.07). Positive DM was not associated with SLN metastasis on univariate analysis (OR 1.69, 95% CI: 0.95-3.00, P = 0.07) or on multivariate analysis adjusted for Breslow depth, Clark level, mitotic rate, and ulceration (OR = 1.59, 95% CI: 0.89-2.85; P = 0.12).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with thin melanoma, a positive DM on initial biopsy is not associated with risk of SLN metastasis, so DM positivity should not be considered an indication for SLN staging in an otherwise low-risk patient.

Impact of Biopsy Modality on the Management of Cutaneous Melanoma of the Head and Neck

Objective

The purpose of this study was to examine how biopsy modality affects the treatment course and outcomes of patients with cutaneous melanoma of the head and neck. Specifically, we investigated if partial biopsy techniques are associated with positive margins on definitive wide local excision (DWLE), the need for early reoperation to obtain adequate margins or sentinel lymph node biopsy, and survival.

Study Design

Retrospective case series.

Setting

Tertiary care academic center.

Subjects and Methods

Subjects (N = 170) included all patients who were surgically treated for primary cutaneous melanoma of the head and neck at the University of Missouri–Columbia between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2015. For analysis, patients were divided into 4 groups based on biopsy modality: shave (n = 61), excisional (n = 62), punch (n = 33), and incisional (n = 14).

Results

The shave biopsy group ( P = .0324) and the punch biopsy group ( P = .0479) were significantly more likely to have positive margins on DWLE. The shave biopsy group ( P = .0042) and the punch biopsy group ( P = .0479) were also significantly more likely to need early reoperation. The mean number of sentinel nodes and incidence of positive sentinel nodes detected on pathologic examination did not differ significantly across biopsy modality ( P = .3600). Overall survival ( P = .4605) and disease-free survival ( P = .5011) did not differ significantly among the groups.

Conclusions

Patients diagnosed with shave and punch biopsy techniques are significantly more likely to have positive margins after DWLE and more frequently require early reoperation. Biopsy modality does not appear to influence the number of sentinel nodes detected, the incidence of detecting regional metastases in sentinel nodes, the overall survival, or the disease-free survival.

Risk Factors Predicting Positive Margins at Primary Wide Local Excision of Cutaneous Melanoma

BACKGROUND

A small percentage of patients will have positive histological margins after primary wide local excision (WLE) of cutaneous melanoma (CM). Risk factors that predict marginal involvement at WLE remain unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To identify risk factors associated with positive margins after WLE of CM.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of patients treated at a single institution for CM with sentinel lymph node biopsy from 1997 to 2011 was conducted.

RESULTS

Positive margins occurred in 6% of patients. Patients with positive margins were older (72.4 vs 60.7, p < .001), had thicker tumors (3.6 vs 1.9 mm, p < .001), and often involved the head and neck region (p < .001). Patients with positive margins at WLE had positive margins on initial biopsy (p = .012) and a higher rate of a melanoma in situ component on initial biopsy (24% vs 11%, p = .02). The 5-year local recurrence rate was significantly different between those with positive and negative margins at WLE (16.0% vs 6.9%; p = .047).

CONCLUSION

Positive margins after WLE are uncommon. When a patient has multiple risk factors for positive margins at WLE, histologically clear margins should be obtained through mapped serial excision or Mohs micrographic surgery.

Malignant Melanoma: Beyond the Basics

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After reading this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Discuss the initial management of cutaneous malignant melanoma with regard to diagnostic biopsy and currently accepted resection margins. 2. Be familiar with the management options for melanoma in specific situations such as subungual melanoma, auricular melanoma, and melanoma in the pregnant patient. 3. Discuss the differentiating characteristics of desmoplastic melanoma and its treatment options. 4. List the indications for sentinel lymph node biopsy and be aware of the ongoing trials and current literature. 5. Discuss the medical therapies available to patients with metastatic melanoma.

SUMMARY

Management of the melanoma patient is a complex and evolving subject. Plastic surgeons should be aware of the recent changes in the field. Excisional biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosis, although there is no evidence that use of other biopsy types alters survival or recurrence. Wide local excisions should be carried out with margins as recommended by National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines according to lesion Breslow depth, with sentinel lymph node biopsy being offered to all medically suitable candidates with intermediate thickness melanomas (1.0 to 4.0 mm), and with sentinel lymph node biopsy being considered for high-risk lesions (ulceration and/or high mitotic figures) with melanomas of 0.75 to 1.0 mm. Melanomas diagnosed during pregnancy can be treated with preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and wide local excision under local anesthesia, with sentinel lymph node biopsy under general anesthesia delayed until after delivery. Management of desmoplastic melanoma is currently controversial with regard to the indications for sentinel lymph node biopsy and the efficacy of postoperative radiation therapy. Subungual and auricular melanoma have evolved from being treated by amputation of the involved appendage to less radical procedures-ear reconstruction is now attempted in the absence of gross invasion into the perichondrium, and subungual melanomas may be treated with wide local excision down to and including the periosteum, with immediate full-thickness skin grafting over bone. Although surgical treatment remains the current gold standard, recent advances in immunotherapy and targeted molecular therapy for metastatic melanoma show great promise for the development of medical therapies for melanoma.

Melanoma in situ: Part II. Histopathology, treatment, and clinical management

Melanoma in situ (MIS) poses special challenges with regard to histopathology, treatment, and clinical management. The negligible mortality and normal life expectancy associated with patients with MIS should guide treatment for this tumor. Similarly, the approach to treatment should take into account the potential for MIS to transform into invasive melanoma, which has a significant impact on morbidity and mortality. Part II of this continuing medical education article reviews the histologic features, treatment, and management of MIS.

Effect of biopsy type on outcomes in the treatment of primary cutaneous melanoma

BACKGROUND

Surgical excision remains the primary and only potentially curative treatment for melanoma. Although current guidelines recommend excisional biopsy as the technique of choice for evaluating lesions suspected of being primary melanomas, other biopsy types are commonly used. We sought to determine the impact of biopsy type (excisional, shave, or punch) on outcomes in melanoma.

METHODS

A prospectively collected, institutional review board-approved database of primary clinically node-negative melanomas (stages cT1-4N0) was reviewed to determine the impact of biopsy type on T-staging accuracy, wide local excision (WLE) area (cm(2)), sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) identification rates and results, tumor recurrence, and patient survival.

RESULTS

Seven hundred nine patients were diagnosed by punch biopsy (23%), shave biopsy (34%), and excisional biopsy (43%). Shave biopsy results showed significantly more positive deep margins (P < .001). Both shave and punch biopsy results showed more positive peripheral margins (P < .001) and a higher risk of finding residual tumor (with resulting tumor upstaging) in the WLE (P < .001), compared with excisional biopsy. Punch biopsy resulted in a larger mean WLE area compared with shave and excisional biopsies (P = .030), and this result was sustained on multivariate analysis. SLNB accuracy was 98.5% and was not affected by biopsy type. Similarly, biopsy type did not confer survival advantage or impact tumor recurrence; the finding of residual tumor in the WLE impacted survival on univariate but not multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Both shave and punch biopsies demonstrated a significant risk of finding residual tumor in the WLE, with pathologic upstaging of the WLE. Punch biopsy also led to a larger mean WLE area compared with other biopsy types. However, biopsy type did not impact SLNB accuracy or results, tumor recurrence, or disease-specific survival (DSS). Punch and shave biopsies, when used appropriately, should not be discouraged for the diagnosis of melanoma.

Prognosis of patients with transected melanomas

BACKGROUND

The management of melanoma is directly related to Breslow's depth. Biopsying melanomas in a fashion that transects the deep margin precludes an accurate measurement of the true depth.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the prognosis of melanomas transected along the deep margins, as well as cases where no residual melanoma was seen on re-excision after transection.

METHODS

Records from a cohort of patients at one institution were examined from 1996 through 2007. Patients were considered to have "transected" melanomas if tumor cells were present on the deep margin of the biopsy. Overall survival was determined.

RESULTS

Seven hundred fourteen patients were examined. 171 (24%) of all melanomas were transected. 101(59%) of those lacked tumor cells on re-excision. Patients with transected melanomas were older (OR = 1.03, p < .001), and had higher Breslow's depths (OR = 1.21, p < .001) than those without transected tumors. Those with no residual melanoma after transection were younger (OR = 0.98, p = .010) and more likely to have no lymph node involvement (OR = 2.23, p = .037). Neither transection (p = .760), nor lack of residual melanoma on re-excision after transection (p = .793) influenced survival.

CONCLUSION

A high number of melanomas are transected at diagnosis, many of which lack visible tumor. The original Breslow's depth of transected melanomas without residual tumor on re-excision accurately predicts survival and prognosis.