The perioperative management of patients with coronary artery stents: surveying the clinical stakeholders and arriving at a consensus regarding optimal care

Risk comparison of bleeding and ischemic perioperative complications after acute and elective orthopedic surgery in patients with cardiovascular disease

INTRODUCTION

The study objective was to ascertain the incidence of bleeding and ischemic complications related to acute and planned orthopedic surgery in patients with known cardiovascular diseases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study conducted between 2010 and 2013 enrolled 477 patients (289 women, 188 men) with a diagnosed cardiovascular disease or a history of thromboembolic event. Aside from gender, age, height and weight, the study observed other anamnestic data and perioperative laboratory test results that may impact on a bleeding or ischemic event.

RESULTS

Two hundred seventy-two (57 %) patients had acute surgery, and 205 (43 %) patients had elective surgery. Complications arose in 55 (11.6 %) patients, 32 (6.9 %) had bleeding complications, 19 (4.0 %) ischemic complications, and both complications were experienced by 4 (0.8 %) patients. Bleeding developed in 14 (5.1 %) patients who had acute surgery, and in 22 (10.7 %) who had elective surgery. Twenty-two (8.1 %) patients having acute surgery and one (0.1 %) undergoing elective surgery suffered from ischemic complications. The incidence of bleeding complications was significantly higher in elective surgery (p = 0.026, OR 2.22), and when adjusted (general anaesthesia, gender, and use of warfarin), the difference was even higher (p = 0.015, OR 2.44), whereas the occurrence of ischemic complications was significantly higher in acute surgery (p = 0.005, OR 18.0), and when adjusted (age), the difference remained significant (p = 0.044, OR 8.3).

CONCLUSIONS

The study noted a significantly higher incidence of bleeding complications in elective orthopedic surgery when compared with acute surgery. Conversely, the incidence of ischemic complications was significantly higher in patients having acute orthopedic surgery when compared with those operated on electively.

Perioperative cardiovascular complications versus perioperative bleeding in consecutive patients with known cardiac disease undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Focus on antithrombotic medication. The PRAGUE-14 registry

Background

Interruption of antithrombotic treatment before surgery may prevent bleeding, but at the price of increasing cardiovascular complications. This prospective study analysed the impact of antithrombotic therapy interruption on outcomes in non-selected surgical patients with known cardiovascular disease (CVD).

Methods

All 1200 consecutive patients (age 74.2 ± 10.2 years) undergoing major non-cardiac surgery (37.4 % acute, 61.4 % elective) during a period of 2.5 years while having at least one CVD were enrolled. Details on medication, bleeding, cardiovascular complications and cause of death were registered.

Results

In-hospital mortality was 3.9 % (versus 0.9 % mortality among 17,740 patients without CVD). Cardiovascular complications occurred in 91 (7.6 %) patients (with 37.4 % case fatality). Perioperative bleeding occurred in 160 (13.3 %) patients and was fatal in 2 (1.2 % case fatality). Multivariate analysis revealed age, preoperative anaemia, history of chronic heart failure, acute surgery and general anaesthesia predictive of cardiovascular complications. For bleeding complications multivariate analysis found warfarin use in the last 3 days, history of hypertension and general anaesthesia as independent predictive factors. Aspirin interruption before surgery was not predictive for either cardiovascular or for bleeding complications.

Conclusions

Perioperative cardiovascular complications in these high-risk elderly all-comer surgical patients with known cardiovascular disease are relatively rare, but once they occur, the case fatality is high. Perioperative bleeding complications are more frequent, but their case fatality is extremely low. Patterns of interruption of chronic aspirin therapy before major non-cardiac surgery are not predictive for perioperative complications (neither cardiovascular, nor bleeding). Simple baseline clinical factors are better predictors of outcomes than antithrombotic drug interruption patterns.

[Thromboprophylaxis and platelet aggregation inhibitors in spinal surgery: perioperative management]

BACKGROUND

The perioperative use of anticoagulants (AC) and platelet aggregation inhibitors (PAI) in the field of spinal surgery suggests an increased rate of epidural bleeding. However, evidence is lacking and these medications are most often indispensable in the prevention of thromboembolic complications. Comprehensive recommendations for the correct use of AC and PAI are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was an analysis of the current situation with regards to the use of AC and PAI in spinal surgery and development of new recommendations.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Two independent surveys on the perioperative use of AC and PAI were obtained from centers for spinal surgery in Germany. The study obtained information on the perioperative use of AC and PAI, risk assessment of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events as well as on the type and extent of the substance groups used.

RESULTS

Almost the entire patient collective (98%) received perioperative low molecular weight heparin. In 64% the medical prophylaxis was started before surgery and in 36% after surgery. The period of prophylaxis was determined arbitrarily. Approximately 40% of interviewees employed paravertebral infiltration and 19% injected into the epidural space in patients on PAI medication. Open spinal canal surgery was performed in 30% of PAI medicated patients and closed spinal canal surgery was executed in 40%. The risk assessment of PAI differed significantly between aspirin and receptor blocker medication as well as dual administration of PAI.

DISCUSSION

The use of AC and PAI in spinal surgery in Germany is very heterogeneous and large deviations from the guidelines frequently occurred. Therefore, there is a strong need for further studies to accurately assess the perioperative use of AC and PAI and to formulate precise recommendations.

Perioperative evaluation and management of cardiac disease in the ambulatory surgery setting

Preoperative cardiac evaluation focuses on risk assessment and reduction. Diagnostic testing and interventions are used only when the risk of adverse outcomes is high and intervention will lower the risk. The evaluation is performed in a stepwise fashion according to guidelines in the literature.