Incidence, risk factors, and management options for portal vein thrombosis after hepatectomy: a 14-year, single-center experience

Rescue liver transplantation for post-hepatectomy liver failure- single center retrospective analysis

INTRODUCTION

Liver transplantation (LT) is a well-established method applied for the treatment of various liver diseases, including primary and secondary malignancies, as well as acute liver failure triggered by different mechanisms. In turn, liver failure (PHLF) is the most severe complication observed after liver resection (LR). PHLF is an extremely rare indication for LT. The aim of the present study was to assess the results of LT in patients with PHLF.

METHODS

Relevant cases were extracted from the prospectively collected database of all LTs performed in our center. All clinical variables, details of the perioperative course of each patient and long-term follow-up data were thoroughly assessed.

RESULTS

Between January 2000 and August 2023, 2703 LTs were carried out. Among them, six patients underwent LT for PHLF, which accounted for 0.2% of all patients. The median age of the patients was 38 years (range 24-66 years). All patients underwent major liver resection before listing for LT. The 90-day mortality after LT was 66.7% (4 out of 6 patients), and all patients experienced complications in the posttransplant course. One patient required early retransplantation due to primary non-function (PNF). The last two transplanted patients are alive at 7 years and 12 months after LT, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In an unselected population of patients with PHLF, LT is a very morbid procedure associated with high mortality but should be considered the only life-saving option in this group.

Platelet Activation is Upregulated in Cirrhotic Patients with Portal Vein Thrombosis

OBJECTIVE

 Platelet plays a key role in thrombosis formation, especially that the alteration of platelet function may influence the thrombosis development. This study aimed to investigate platelet function alterations in the formation of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in cirrhosis.

METHODS

 Cirrhotic patients admitted to The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University between October 2021 and April 2023 were recruited and divided into PVT and non-PVT groups according to radiological results. Clinical parameters and prognosis were also collected and assessed to identify potential risk factors. Flow cytometry was used to detect the expression of CD62p, CD63, monocyte-platelet aggregates (MPAs), neutrophil-platelet aggregates (NPAs), and von Willebrand factor antigen (vWF-Ag) to evaluate platelet activation and adhesion function.

RESULTS

 A total of 145 subjects were enrolled in our study including 60 cirrhotic PVT patients, 60 cirrhotic non-PVT patients, and 25 healthy volunteers. Multivariate analysis suggested that esophageal gastric varices, splenectomy, and D-dimer were independent risk factors for PVT pathogenesis in cirrhosis. The vWF-Ag expression level was reduced in the PVT group compared with the non-PVT group (p = 0.046) but was not an independent risk factor for PVT formation pathogenesis. The expression of CD41+CD62p+ and CD41+CD63+ platelets in the PVT group was significantly elevated compared with that in the non-PVT group (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in MPAs and NPAs between the two cirrhotic groups. Subgroup analysis showed that the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of CD62p and CD63 was associated with portal hypertension-related complications (p = 0.008, p < 0.001), and CD63 MFI was significantly associated with thrombosis burden (p = 0.019). CD41+CD62p+ and CD41+CD63+ platelets as well as MPAs and NPAs were highly expressed in the splenectomy group compared with those in the nonsplenectomy group in cirrhotic patients (p < 0.05). Positive correlations were found between CD62p MFI and CD63 MFI, MPAs and NPAs (r = 0.642, p < 0.001; r = 0.378, p = 0.003; r = 0.430, p < 0.001). In addition, platelet counts were also correlated with MPAs (r = 0.556, p < 0.001) and NPAs (r = 0.467, p < 0.001). Cirrhotic patients with PVT had higher mortality and were more likely to experience portal hypertension-related complications in the prognostic analysis (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

 Highly activated platelet function exists in patients with cirrhosis, and platelet activation was elevated during PVT formation, suggesting that activated platelets may participate in the formation of PVT in patients with cirrhosis.

Early portal vein thrombosis after hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: Incidence, risk factors, and management

AIM

To study the incidence, risk factors and management of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) after hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC).

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Single-center retrospective analysis of 86 consecutive patients who underwent major hepatectomy for PHCC, between 2012 and 2019, with comparison of the characteristics of the groups with (PVT+) and without (PVT-) postoperative portal vein thrombosis.

RESULTS

Seven patients (8%) presented with PVT diagnosed during the first postoperative week. Preoperative portal embolization had been performed in 71% of patients in the PVT+ group versus 34% in the PVT- group (P=0.1). Portal reconstruction was performed in 100% and 38% of PVT+ and PVT- patients, respectively (P=0.002). In view of the gravity of the clinical and/or biochemical picture, five (71%) patients underwent urgent re-operation with portal thrombectomy, one of whom died early (hemorrhagic shock after surgical treatment of PVT). Two patients had exclusively medical treatment. Complete recanalization of the portal vein was achieved in the short and medium term in the six survivors. After a mean follow-up of 21 months, there was no statistically significant difference in overall survival between the two groups.

FINDINGS

Post-hepatectomy PVT for PHCC is a not-infrequent and potentially lethal event. Rapid management, adapted to the extension of the thrombus and the severity of the thrombosis (hepatic function, signs of portal hypertension) makes it possible to limit the impact on postoperative mortality. We did not identify any modifiable risk factor. However, when it is oncologically and anatomically feasible, left±extended hepatectomy (without portal embolization) may be less risky than extended right hepatectomy, and portal vein resection should only be performed if there is strong suspicion of tumor invasion.

Portal vein thrombosis in a noncirrhotic patient after hemihepatectomy: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a condition caused by hemodynamic disorders. It may be noted in the portal vein system when there is an inflammatory stimulus in the abdominal cavity. However, PVT is rarely reported after hepatectomy. At present, related guidelines and major expert opinions tend to consider vitamin K antagonists or low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) as the standard treatment. But based on research, direct oral anticoagulants may be more effective and safe for noncirrhotic PVT and are also beneficial by reducing the recurrence rate of PVT.

CASE SUMMARY

A 51-year-old woman without any history of disease felt discomfort in her right upper abdomen for 20 d, with worsening for 7 d. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) of the upper abdomen showed right liver intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with multiple intrahepatic metastases but not to the left liver. Therefore, she underwent right hepatic and caudate lobectomy. One week after surgery, the patient underwent a CECT scan, due to nausea, vomiting, and abdominal distension. Thrombosis in the left branch and main trunk of the portal vein and near the confluence of the splenic vein was found. After using LMWH for 22 d, CECT showed no filling defect in the portal vein system.

CONCLUSION

Although PVT after hepatectomy is rare, it needs to be prevented during the perioperative period.

Portal vein thrombosis after right hepatectomy: impact of portal vein resection and morphological changes of the portal vein

BACKGROUND

Right hepatectomy occasionally requires portal vein resection (PVR) and causes postoperative portal vein thrombosis (PVT).

METHODS

A total of 247 patients who underwent right hepatectomy were evaluated using a three-dimensional analyzer to identify the morphologic changes in the portal vein (PV). The patients' characteristics were compared between the PVR group (n = 73) and non-PVR group (n = 174), and risk factors for PVT were investigated. The PVR group were subdivided into the wedge resection (WR) group (n = 38) and segmental resection (SR) group (n= 35).

RESULTS

Postoperative PVT occurred in 20 patients (8.1%). Multivariate analyses in all patients revealed that postoperative left PV diameter/main PV diameter (L/M ratio) <0.56 (odds ratio [OR] 4.00, p = 0.009) and PVR (OR 3.31, p = 0.031) were significant risk factors for PVT. In 73 patients who underwent PVR, PVT occurred in 14 (19%) and WR (OR 11.5, p = 0.005) and L/M ratio <0.56 (OR 5.51, p = 0.016) were significant risk factors for PVT.

CONCLUSION

PVR was one of the significant risk factors for PVT after right hepatectomy. SR rather than WR may be recommended for preventing PVT.

Prospective validation to prevent symptomatic portal vein thrombosis after liver resection

BACKGROUND

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) after liver resection is rare but can lead to life-threatening liver failure. This prospective study evaluated patients using contrast-enhanced computed tomography (E-CT) on the first day after liver resection for early PVT detection and management.

AIM

To evaluate patients by E-CT on the first day after liver resection for early PVT detection and immediate management.

METHODS

Patients who underwent liver resection for primary liver cancer from January 2015 were enrolled. E-CT was performed on the first day after surgery in patients undergoing anatomical resection, multiple resections, or with postoperative bile leakage in the high-risk group for PVT. When PVT was detected, anticoagulant therapy including heparin, warfarin, and edoxaban was administered. E-CT was performed monthly until PVT resolved.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of PVT was 1.57% (8/508). E-CT was performed on the first day after surgery in 235 consecutive high-risk patients (165 anatomical resections, 74 multiple resections, and 28 bile leakages), with a PVT incidence of 3.4% (8/235). Symptomatic PVT was not observed in the excluded cohort. Multivariate analyses revealed that sectionectomy was the only independent predictor of PVT [odds ratio (OR) = 12.20; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.22-115.97; P = 0.003]. PVT was found in the umbilical portion of 75.0% (6/8) of patients, and sectionectomy on the left side showed the highest risk of PVT (OR = 14.10; 95%CI: 3.17-62.71; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Sectionectomy on the left side should be chosen with caution as it showed the highest risk of PVT. E-CT followed by anticoagulant therapy was effective in managing early-phase PVT for 2 mo without adverse events.

Liver Surgery: Important Considerations for Pre- and Postoperative Imaging

Liver surgery may be a curative treatment option not only for primary liver neoplasms but also for liver metastases in selected patients. The number of liver surgeries performed worldwide has increased, but surgical morbidity associated with these surgeries remains significant. Therefore, radiologists need to understand the terminology, surgical techniques, resectability and unresectability criteria, and possible postoperative complications as these are part of the decision-making process. Because vascular and biliary variations are common, an adequate preoperative anatomic evaluation determines the best surgical technique, helps identify patients in whom additional surgical steps will be required, and reduces the risk of inadvertent injury. The surgeon must ensure that the future liver remnant is sufficient to maintain adequate function, aided by the radiologist who can provide valuable information such as the presence of steatosis, biliary dilatation, signs of cirrhosis, and portal hypertension, in addition to the volume of the future liver remnant. Postoperative complications must also be understood and evaluated. The most common postoperative complications are vascular (bleeding, thrombosis, and ischemia), biliary (fistulas, bilomas, and strictures), infectious (incisional or deep), those related to liver failure, and even tumor recurrence. An invited commentary by Winslow is available online. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2022.

Recurrent acute portal vein thrombosis with severe abdominal infection after right hemihepatectomy in a patient with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: A case report and literature review

Introduction and importance

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a serious complication after hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgery. There have been few studies on recurrent PVT after hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Case presentation

We report the case of a 66-year-old woman who was diagnosed with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and treated with right hemihepatectomy. On the sixth day, the patient developed acute portal vein thrombosis, and emergency portal vein incision and surgical thrombectomy were performed. On the seventh day after thrombectomy, the patient developed acute portal vein thrombosis again, and portal vein thrombectomy+portal vein bridging was performed again. There was still thrombosis after the operation. The patient was then treated with superior mesenteric arteriography + indirect portal vein catheterization thrombolysis and local thrombolysis + anticoagulation and systemic anticoagulation therapy. The patient had a complicated abdominal infection. The total hospital stay was 84 days. There was no thrombosis in the portal vein at discharge.

Clinical discussion

Although the procedure was carefully performed with a preoperative plan and fine intraoperative vascular anastomosis, postoperative PVT occurred. There are many factors of portal vein thrombosis, and there are many treatment methods.

Conclusion

PVT often develops in patients with liver cirrhosis postoperatively and after liver transplantation. Recurrent PVT after hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma is a rare complication.

•

Recurrent PVT after hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma is rare.

•

Artificial blood vessels can avoid portal vein angulation.

•

Surgery combined with interventional therapy and drug therapy are available.

•

The final outcome of the patient is usually good.

Asymptomatic Venous Thromboembolism After Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery: Early Detection Using D-dimer and Soluble Fibrin Monomer Complex Levels

AIM

The aim was to investigate the usefulness of a preemptive management strategy that includes monitoring serum D-dimer (DD) and soluble fibrin monomer complex (SFMC) levels for early detection and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after hepatobiliary-pancreatic (HBP) surgery.

METHODS

Overall, 678 patients who underwent HBP surgery between January 2010 and March 2020 were enrolled. Patients with increased postoperative serum DD or SFMC levels underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography, and those with VTE received anticoagulant agents. The VTE risk factors were investigated using multivariable analysis. Postoperative changes in DD and SFMC levels were verified, and their ability to identify VTE was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

RESULTS

VTE developed in 83 patients (12.2%), and no symptomatic VTE or death due to VTE was observed. Multivariable analysis identified female sex (odds ratio [OR] 2.26; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.41-3.60; P < .001) and surgery duration of ≥401 min (OR 2.07; 95% CI 1.27-3.35; P < .001) as independent risk factors for VTE. Maximum serum DD and SFMC levels in patients who developed VTE were significantly higher than those in patients without VTE (DD, 15.1 vs 8.9 μg/mL, P < .001; SFMC, 18.0 vs 10.2 μg/mL, P < .001, respectively). Both DD (n = 678) and the combination of DD and SFMC levels (n = 230) showed a good ability to detect VTE (area under the ROC curve, 0.804 and 0.761, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Our preemptive strategy of monitoring serum DD and SFMC levels enables early detection and treatment intervention of VTE after HBP surgery.

Robotic Right Hepatectomy with Portal Vein Thrombectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastasis (with Video)

BACKGROUND

Hepatectomy is the standard treatment for colorectal liver metastases. However, the high recurrence rate is a persistent problem that occurs in up to 65% of patients. Repeat hepatectomy is a feasible treatment and may offer favorable surviva but is technically demanding so minimally invasive repeat hepatectomy has been used in a few patients. Colorectal liver metastases are different from hepatocellular carcinoma and rarely present with macroscopic portal vein tumoral thrombus. To the best of our knowledge, minimally invasive approaches for this rare condition have not yet been reported.

METHOD

We present here a video of a robotic right hepatectomy in a patient with single colorectal liver metastasis and macroscopic tumor thrombi in the right portal vein. A 61-year-old woman underwent open resection of a transverse colon cancer (T3N0M0) in December 2015. In March 2019, she underwent nonanatomical resection of a liver metastases located in segment 6 also via an open approach. She then underwent adjuvant chemotherapy. However, in September 2020, she presented with a local recurrence and a tumor thrombus in the right portal vein. She was then referred to us for treatment and a multidisciplinary team decided on upfront liver resection due to the risk of left portal vein progression. Liver volumetry showed future liver remnant of 52.5%. Right hepatectomy with portal vein thrombectomy was indicated. A robotic approach was proposed, and consent was obtained.

RESULTS

The Da Vinci system was used. The operation began with the division of adhesions from previous laparotomies. Intraoperative ultrasound was performed to locate the tumor and to confirm the portal vein invasion. Hepatic hilum was carefully dissected. The replaced right hepatic artery from the superior mesenteric artery was ligated and divided. The common bile duct was dissected and encircled with a vessel loop. The portal vein was dissected, and an enlarged right portal vein with a protruding tumoral thrombus was seen. The left portal vein and portal vein trunk were then temporarily clamped. The right portal vein was carefully transected with robotic scissors being careful not to displace the thrombus. A minimum stump was left to safely suture the portal vein. The portal vein was then closed with a running 5-0 prolene suture. The portal vein clamping was then released, and a patent anastomosis with no leakage was observed. Right liver ischemic discoloration was seen and confirmed with fluorescence imaging after indocyanine green injection. A future line of transection was marked along ischemic area. The liver was divided using bipolar forceps under saline irrigation until it was detached from the retrohepatic vena cava. A right hepatic vein was divided with a stapler to complete the right hepatectomy. The surgical specimen was removed through a suprapubic incision, and the abdominal cavity was drained with a closed-suction drain. The total operative time was 270 min with no transfusion. Pathology conformed the diagnosis with free surgical margins.

CONCLUSION

Robotic right hepatectomy with tumor thrombectomy is feasible and safe even in the presence of lobar portal vein invasion. This video may help HPB surgeons perform this complex procedure.

Prediction of portal vein thrombosis after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) following hepatectomy is potentially life-threatening. We aimed to evaluate the incidence of PVT after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma and identify coagulation and fibrinolytic factors that could predict early-stage postoperative PVT.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 65 hepatocellular carcinoma patients who underwent radical hepatectomy. The risk factors for postoperative PVT were identified based on univariate and multivariate analyses, and the levels of coagulation and fibrinolytic factors were measured during the perioperative period.

RESULTS

The incidence of PVT after hepatectomy was 20.0%. The patients were divided into two groups: those with PVT (n=13; PVT group) and those without PVT (n=52; no-PVT group). The frequency of the use of the Pringle maneuver during surgery was higher in the PVT group than in the no-PVT group, and the postoperative/preoperative ratios of thrombin-antithrombin III complex (TAT) and of D-dimer were significantly higher in the PVT group.

CONCLUSION

A high incidence of PVT was found in hepatocellular carcinoma patients after hepatectomy. The frequency of the Pringle maneuver is a potential risk factor for postoperative PVT, and the postoperative/preoperative TAT and D-dimer ratios may be used as early predictors of PVT after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Massage of the Hepatoduodenal Ligament Recovers Portal Vein Flow Immediately After the Pringle Maneuver in Hepatectomy

BACKGROUND

The Pringle maneuver is often used in liver surgery to minimize bleeding during liver transection. Many authors have demonstrated that intermittent use of the Pringle maneuver is safe and effective when performed appropriately. However, some studies have reported that the Pringle maneuver is a significant risk factor for portal vein thrombosis. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of portal vein flow after the Pringle maneuver and the impact that massaging the hepatoduodenal ligament after the Pringle maneuver has on portal vein flow.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients treated with the Pringle maneuver for hepatectomies performed to treat hepatic disease at our hospital between August 2014 and March 2019 were included in the study (N = 101). We divided these patients into two groups, a massage group and nonmassage group. We measured portal vein blood flow with ultrasonography before and after clamping of the hepatoduodenal ligament. We also evaluated laboratory data after the hepatectomy.

RESULTS

Portal vein flow was significantly lower after the Pringle maneuver than before clamping of the hepatoduodenal ligament. The portal vein flow after the Pringle maneuver was improved following massage of the hepatoduodenal ligament. After hepatectomy, serum prothrombin time was significantly higher and serum C-reactive protein was significantly lower in the massage group than in the nonmassage group.

CONCLUSION

Massaging the hepatoduodenal ligament after the Pringle maneuver is recommended in order to quickly recover portal vein flow during hepatectomy and to improve coagulability.

Risk Factors and Outcome of Portal Vein Thrombosis After Laparoscopic and Open Hepatectomy for Primary Liver Cancer: A Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Post-hepatectomy portal vein thrombosis (PH-PVT) is a severe complication. The risk factors of PH-PVT after laparoscopic and open hepatectomy have not been clarified yet. We aimed to retrospectively investigate the risk factors and outcome of PH-PVT in patients with primary liver cancer.

METHODS

We enrolled 622 consecutive patients who underwent hepatectomy in our hospital between January 2006 and August 2016.

RESULTS

Of 21 patients (3.4%) with PH-PVT, 7 had grade I; 13, grade II; and 1, grade III. The patients with PH-PVT were significantly older than those without PH-PVT. Of the 413 patients who underwent open hepatectomy, those who underwent a major right hepatectomy (4.1%) had a slightly higher incidence of PH-PVT. Of the 209 patients who underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy, those who underwent a left lateral sectionectomy (21.2%) and major right hepatectomy (16.7%) had high incidence rates of PH-PVT. The treatment was only observation in five patients, medication with an antithrombotic drug in 15 patients, and reoperation in one patient. PH-PVT diminished in 17 patients. Cavernous transformation and/or stenosis of the portal vein developed in three patients. The patient with grade III PH-PVT after open right hemihepatectomy underwent reoperation but died of hepatic failure.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that patient age, left lateral sectionectomy were risk factors of PH-PVT. Laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy and major right hepatectomy might bring about relatively higher risk of PH-PVT. Major right hepatectomy tends to lead to severe PH-PVT. Careful handling of the PV during hepatectomy and early treatment of PH-PVT are necessary.

Narrowing of the remnant portal vein diameter and decreased portal vein angle are risk factors for portal vein thrombosis after perihilar cholangiocarcinoma surgery

PURPOSE

To evaluate the incidence, risk factors, management options, and outcomes of portal vein thrombosis following major hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

A total of 177 perihilar cholangiocarcinoma patients who (1) underwent major hepatectomy and (2) underwent investigating the portal vein morphology, which was measured by rotating the reconstructed three-dimensional images after facilitating bone removal using Aquarius iNtuition workstation between 2002 and 2018, were included. Risk factors were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

Six patients developed portal vein thrombosis (3.4%) within a median time of 6.5 (range 0-22) days. Portal vein and hepatic artery resection were performed in 30% and 6% patients, respectively. A significant difference in the probability of the occurrence of portal vein thrombosis (PV) within 30 days was found among patients with portal vein resection, a postoperative portal vein angle < 100°, remnant portal vein diameter < 5.77 mm, main portal vein diameter > 13.4 mm, and blood loss (log-rank test, p = 0.003, p = 0.06, p < 0.0001, p = 0.01, and p = 0.03, respectively). Decreasing the portal vein angle and narrowing of the remnant PV diameter remained significant predictors on multivariate analysis (p = 0.027 and 0.002, respectively). Reoperation with thrombectomy was performed in four patients, and the other two patients were successfully treated with anticoagulants. All six patients subsequently recovered and were discharged between 25 and 70 days postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Narrowing of the remnant portal vein diameter and a decreased portal vein angle after major hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma are significant independent risk factors for postoperative portal vein thrombosis.

New classification-oriented treatment strategy for portal vein thrombosis after hepatectomy

AIM

This study sought to evaluate the incidence, risk factors, and clinical outcomes of portal vein thrombosis after hepatectomy. Furthermore, we proposed a novel classification and treatment strategy for portal vein thrombosis after hepatectomy.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 398 patients who underwent hepatectomy and enhanced computed tomography imaging within 14 days after surgery in our hospital from 2009 to 2019. Portal vein thrombosis was classified into three categories according to the location of the thrombus - main, hilar, and peripheral - with main portal vein thrombosis further subclassified into three grades. Each patient's treatment strategy was determined based on their portal vein thrombosis classification and grading. From 2015, enhanced computed tomography imaging was performed routinely on patients who underwent anatomical hepatectomy on postoperative day 7.

RESULTS

Portal vein thrombosis was diagnosed in 57 patients (14.3%) during the study period. Multivariate analysis revealed that a Pringle maneuver time of 75 minutes or longer was a significant predictor of portal vein thrombosis (P = .012). In total, 52 patients (91%) with portal vein thrombosis recovered by surgery, anticoagulant therapy, or without specific treatment. There was no instance of mortality recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who undergo hepatectomy are at high risk for portal vein thrombosis, especially when the Pringle maneuver time is long. The proposed classification and treatment strategy may be useful for clinical management of patients with portal vein thrombosis after hepatectomy.

Liver resection in Cirrhotic liver: Are there any limits?

Liver resection remains one of the most technically challenging surgical procedure in abdominal surgery due to the complex anatomical arrangement in the liver and its rich blood supply that constitutes about 20% of the cardiac output per cycle. The challenge for resection in cirrhotic livers is even higher because of the impact of surgical stress and trauma imposed on borderline liver function and the impaired ability for liver regeneration in cirrhotic livers. Nonetheless, evolution and advancement in surgical techniques as well as knowledge in perioperative management of liver resection has led to a substantial improvement in surgical outcome in recent decade. The objective of this article was to provide updated information on the recent developments in liver surgery, from preoperative evaluation, to technicality of resection, future liver remnant augmentation and finally, postoperative management of complications.

Platelet's Rule of Change and Clinical Significance before and after Splenectomy

Portal vein system thrombosis (PVST) is a form of venous thrombosis, which behaves as a common and potentially life-threatening complication after splenectomy. Numerous studies have been made to investigate the mechanism and the risk factors of PVST. However, the research on the prevention and treatment of PVST associated with platelet's (PLT) rule of change is rare. This work mainly investigates the PLT's rule of change and its correlativity with the formation of PVST after splenectomy. The retrospective study included 117 patients who underwent splenectomy from August 2014 to June 2018 and monitored by blood routine, D-dimer (D-D), and portal vein system ultrasound routinely after splenectomy. The changes of PLT and D-D were recorded and compared before and after each operation. We analyzed the changes of PLTand D-D as well as the incidence of PVST postoperatively. Most of the patients’ PLT increased significantly after splenectomy. On the first day after operation, there were 80 patients’ (68.38%) PLTrecovered to normal or above normal. The proportion of patients with abnormally high PLT value on the seventh and fourteenth day were 60.68 per cent and 81.20 per cent, respectively. Thereinto, there were 67 patients’ (57.26%) PLT beyond 500 x 109/L on the 14th day. The D-D of all patients exceeded the normal range on the first, seventh, and fourteenth day after operation, and the difference was statistically significant ( P < 0.05), which behaved similar like PLT. Meanwhile, our color Doppler ultrasonography showed that the incidence of PVST was 70.79 per cent. Among the patients with PVST, 82 (100%) patients’ PLT was increased after operation. The PLT of patients increased obviously after splenectomy. The increased blood viscosity caused by the consecutive elevation of PLT may result in a higher PVST incidence. Early intervention and treatment are needed clinically for PVST after splenectomy.

Portal Cavernoma Complicating a Persistent Postoperative Bile Leak after Liver Hydatid Cyst Surgery: -a Report Case-

INTRODUCTION: Hydatid cyst is a parasitic infection caused by the larval form of Echinococcus granulosis. Portal hypertension is an unusual postoperative complication after a liver hydatid cyst surgery. CASE PRESENTATION: To illustrate this rare condition, we present the case of a 32-year-old patient operated for a liver hydatid cyst with late-onset postoperative complications. The patient suffered from secondary digestive bleeding because of portal hypertension and was therefore treated with a distal splenorenal shunt (Warren). CONCLUSION: Surgery of hydatid cyst may cause severe complications like portal hypertension and in certain cases, distal splenorenal anastomosis might represent an important treatment option that needs to be performed in specialised centres. Keywords: Liver cyst, Portal hypertension, Splenorenal shunt.

Incidence of Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis After Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Abdominal surgery may increase the risk of splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT). We determined the incidence of SVT after abdominal surgery and identified groups at highest risk.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MEDLINE and Embase were searched for clinical studies evaluating the incidence of postoperative SVT after abdominopelvic surgery. Study selection, data abstraction, and risk of bias assessment were carried out independently by two reviewers. Clinical heterogeneity was explored by subgroup analyses (i.e., type of intra-abdominal procedure and organ group).

RESULTS

Of 5549 abstracts screened, 48 were analyzed. Pooled incidence of SVT (n = 50,267) was 2.68% [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.24 to 3.11] (1347 events), I² = 96%. Pooled incidence of SVT in high-risk procedures were splenectomy with devascularization (24%), hepatectomy in patients with cirrhosis (9%), and pancreatectomy with venous resection (5%). Pooled incidence of symptomatic and asymptomatic SVT was 1.02% (95% CI: 0.97% to 1.07%) and 0.98% (95% CI 0.88% to 1.07%), respectively. Most common causes of SVT-related mortality were irreversible thrombosis, bowel ischemia, liver failure, and gastrointestinal bleed. Most studies included were at a high risk of bias due to lack of prospective data collection and lack of SVT screening for all participants.

CONCLUSIONS

Incidence of SVT after abdominal surgery is low but remains a relevant complication. Patients undergoing procedures involving surgical manipulation of the venous system and splenectomy are at the highest risk. Given the life-threatening risks associated with SVT, there is a need for larger prospective studies on the incidence and impact of SVT after abdominal surgery.

Analysis of risk factors for portal vein thrombosis after liver resection

Purpose

We evaluated the risk factors for posthepatectomy thrombosis including portal vein thrombosis (PVT) and clinical outcomes.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 563 patients who had undergone hepatectomy from February 2009 to December 2014. Twenty-nine patients with preoperatively confirmed thrombosis and tumor recurrence-related thrombosis were excluded. We identified the location of the thrombosis as main portal vein (MPV), peripheral portal vein (PPV) and other site such as hepatic vein or inferior vena cava. Patients with MPV thrombosis and PPV thrombosis with main portal flow disturbance were treated with anticoagulation therapy. We performed operative thrombectomy before anticoagulation therapy who did combined portal vein (PV) segmental resection.

Results

Of the 534 patients, 22 (4.1%) developed posthepatectomy thrombosis after hepatectomy. Among them, 19 (86.4%) had PVT. The mean duration of Pringle's maneuver was significant longer in the PVT group than the no-thrombosis group (P = 0.020). Patients who underwent combined PV segmental resection during hepatectomy were more likely to develop posthepatectomy PVT (P = 0.001). Thirteen patients who had MPV thrombosis and PPV thrombosis with main portal flow disturbance received anticoagulation therapy immediately after diagnosis and all of them were improved. Among them, 2 patients who developed PVT at the PV anastomosis site after PV segmental resection, underwent operative thrombectomy before anticoagulation therapy and both were improved. There were no patients who developed complications related to anticoagulation therapy.

Conclusion

Long duration of Pringle's maneuver and PV segmental resection were risk factors. Anticoagulation therapy or operative thrombectomy should be considered for PVT without contraindications.

Acute portal vein thrombosis after hepatectomy in a patient with hepatolithiasis: A case report and review of the literature

RATIONALE

Portal vein thrombosis is defined as any thrombosis that develops in the portal vein system. It is considered a very rare and extremely lethal complication of hepatopancreatobiliary surgery.

PATIENT CONCERNS

Acute portal vein thrombosis after hepatectomy in patients with hepatolithiasisis very rare. Acute portal vein thrombosis is considered as a dangerous complication after hepatectomy. It is easy to ignore the symptom of acute portal vein thrombosis. Once the appropriate time of treatment is past, it would lead to patients' death.

DIAGNOSE

Acute portal vein thrombosis after hepatectomy in a patient with hepatolithiasis INTERVENTIONS:: We consider anticoagulation therapy and percutaneous transhepatic portal vein puncture and thrombectomy once the diagnosis of acute portal vein thrombosis is confirmed.

OUTCOMES

The patient's liver function continued to deteriorate, eventually resulting in death.

LESSONS

Acute portal vein thrombosis after hepatectomy is difficult to diagnose. The management of acute portal vein thrombosis remains controversial according to its severity, location or time of discovering.

Successful recanalization of acute extensive portal vein thrombosis by aspiration thrombectomy and thrombolysis via an operatively placed mesenteric catheter: a case report

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) after hepatobiliary surgery is rare but can cause lethal and severe complications. If early diagnosis and recanalization can be achieved, the PVT is expected to be eliminated. A 70-year-old male was diagnosed as having hepatocellular carcinoma occupying the right lobe of the liver. As oligometastatic lung tumors were simultaneously detected on contrast-enhanced CT (CECT), hepatectomy was not indicated. However, the primary tumor was very large, and as large tumor size can be associated with an unfavorable prognosis, and owing to the strong desire of the patient, he underwent right lobe hepatectomy. Jaundice appeared on post-operative Day (POD) 2 and CECT displayed slight intraheptatic bile duct dilation. However, a PVT did not exist at this time. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage was performed and Doppler echo displayed intrahepatic and extrahepatic PVT on post-operative Day 5. Emergent thrombectomy was performed using a Vasplyser Plus^TM thrombus aspiration catheter (Johnson & Johnson K.K. Medical Company, Tokyo, Japan) via the ileocolic vein under laparotomy. The mesenteric catheter was placed at the distal point of the residual PVT. Thrombolysis and anticoagulant therapy were performed using heparin and urokinase. In the CECT performed 16 days after the additional operation, the PVT had disappeared and the portal vein was completely recanalized. The mesenteric catheter was removed on the same day and oral anticoagulant therapy was continued. At the time of writing, 14 months have passed with no recurrence of PVT. Early diagnosis of PVT enables treatment with emergent thrombectomy, thrombolysis, and anticoagulant therapy. These treatments result in the improvement of portal vein flow and the complete disappearance of PVT.

Platelet Activation Assessed by Glycoprotein VI/Platelet Ratio Is Associated With Portal Vein Thrombosis After Hepatectomy and Splenectomy in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a serious complication after hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgery. Portal vein thrombosis often develops in patients with liver cirrhosis (LC) postoperatively, although they have low platelet counts. Platelet activation is one of the causes of thrombosis formation, and soluble form of glycoprotein VI (sGPVI) has received attention as a platelet activation marker. We had prospectively enrolled the 81 consecutive patients who underwent splenectomy (Sx) and/or hepatectomy: these patients were divided as Sx (n = 38) and hepatectomy (Hx, n = 46) groups. The 3 patients who underwent both procedures were added to both groups. Each group was subdivided into patients with non-LC and LC: non-LC-Sx (n = 22) and LC-Sx (n = 16), non-LC-Hx (n = 40) and LC-Hx (n = 6). The presence of PVT was diagnosed by using enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan. Platelet counts were significantly lower in LC-Sx than in non-LC-Sx, and incidence of PVT was significantly higher in LC-Sx than in non-LC-Sx (68.8% vs 31.8%, P = .024). Soluble form of glycoprotein VI /platelet ratios on preoperative day and postoperative day 1 were significantly higher in LC-Sx than in non-LC-Sx. Incidence of PVT was significantly higher in LC-Hx than in non-LC-Hx (50.0% vs 7.5%, P < .01). Soluble form of glycoprotein VI /platelet ratios were significantly higher in LC-Hx before and after Hx, compared to non-LC-Hx. Patients with LC stay in hypercoagulable state together with platelet activation before and after surgery. Under this circumstance, alteration of portal venous blood flow after Sx or Hx is likely to cause PVT in patients with LC.

Surgical Treatment of Portal Vein Thrombosis With the Use of Cadaveric Venous Patch After Donor Hepatectomy: A Case Report

Live donors should be the priority of transplant professionals to prevent surgery-related morbidity and mortality during living-donor liver transplantation. Portal vein thrombosis after donor hepatectomy is an important complication which can be prevented by careful preoperative as well as perioperative evaluation. If portal vein thrombus occurs after donor hepatectomy, anticoagulation and surgical thrombectomy and even portal vein reconstruction should be kept in mind. Cadaveric venous patches can be used for the reconstruction of narrowed and angulated portal veins. Here we report the surgical treatment of a donor with a cadaveric venous patch who developed portal vein thrombosis after donor hepatectomy.

IMMEDIATE COMPLICATIONS AFTER 88 HEPATECTOMIES - BRAZILIAN CONSECUTIVE SERIES

Background:

Hepatectomies have been increasingly recommended and performed in Brazil; they present great differences related to immediate complications.

Aim:

Assessing the immediate postoperative complications in a series of 88 open liver resections.

Method:

Prospective database of patients subjected to consecutive hepatectomies over nine years. The post-hepatectomy complications were categorized according to the Clavien-Dindo classification; complications presenting grade equal to or greater than 3 were considered major complications. Hepatic resections involving three or more resected liver segments were considered major hepatectomies.

Results:

Eighty-four patients were subjected to 88 hepatectomies, mostly were minor liver resections (50 cases, 56.8%). Most patients had malignant diseases (63 cases; 71.6%). The mean hospitalization time was 10.9 days (4-43). Overall morbidity and mortality rates were 37.5% and 6.8%, respectively. The two most common immediate general complications were intra-peritoneal collections (12.5%) and pleural effusion (12.5%). Bleeding, biliary fistula and liver failure were identified in 6.8%, 4.5% and 1.1% of the cases, respectively, among the hepatectomy-specific complications.

Conclusion:

The patients operated in the second half of the series showed better results, which were apparently influenced by the increased surgical expertise, by the modification of the hepatic parenchyma section method and by the increased organ preservation.

Successful resection of a solitary metastatic liver tumor from prostate cancer 15 years after radical prostatectomy: a case report

Background

A solitary metastatic liver tumor of prostate cancer is extremely rare because liver metastasis occurs as a part of systemic dissemination of prostate cancer. We herein report a successfully resected case of a solitary metastatic liver tumor from prostate cancer almost 15 years after radical prostatectomy.

Case presentation

A 70-year-old male who had undergone radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer 15 years previously presented to our hospital for treatment of a liver tumor. Serum prostate-specific antigen was elevated at 13.77 ng/ml. Abdominal computed tomography revealed a solitary tumor with a diameter of 54 mm in segment 4 of the liver. No metastatic lesions were found in other organs. The patient was given a diagnosis of a metastatic liver tumor from prostate cancer, and he underwent medial segmentectomy. Microscopically, the resected specimen was composed of eosinophilic tumor cells with oval nuclei and prominent nucleoli, which exhibited a cribriform pattern and a fused glands pattern with positive prostate-specific antigen and prostatic acid phosphatase staining; these findings were compatible with metastatic prostate cancer. Other than portal thrombosis that required anticoagulation, the patient made a satisfactory recovery and was discharged on postoperative day 15.

Conclusion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report describing successful resection of a solitary metastatic liver tumor from prostate cancer in the medical literature. In such a rare circumstance, hepatic resection for liver metastasis of prostate cancer seems justified.

Portal vein thrombosis after reconstruction in 270 consecutive patients with portal vein resections in hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) surgery

BACKGROUNDS

This study was aimed to evaluate the occurrence of portal vein thrombosis after portal vein reconstruction.

METHODS

The portal veins were repaired with venorrhaphy, end-to-end, patch graft, and segmental graft in consecutive 270 patients undergoing hepato-pancreto-biliary (HPB) surgery.

RESULTS

Portal vein thrombosis was encountered in 20 of 163 of end-to-end, 2 of 56 of venorrhaphy, and 2 of 5 of patch graft groups, as compared with 0 of 46 of segmental graft group (p < 0.05, N.S., p < 0001, respectively). Portal vein thrombosis occurred more frequently after hepatectomy than after pancreatectomy (p < 0.0001). The restoration of portal vein blood flow was more sufficiently achieved in the early re-operation within 3 days after surgery than in the late re-operation over 5 days after surgery (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The segmental graft might have to be more preferred in the portal vein reconstruction. The revision surgery for portal vein thrombosis should be performed within 3 days after surgery.